new global modeling and assimilation office overview and status … · 2009. 1. 9. · validation,...

31
Validation, Water and Energy Validation, Water and Energy Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Overview and Status Overview and Status Some early results Some early results Monitoring (time permitting) Monitoring (time permitting) Presented by Michael Bosilovich, GSFC, January 5, 2009

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Validation, Water and EnergyValidation, Water and EnergyGlobal Modeling and Assimilation OfficeGlobal Modeling and Assimilation Office

    ►►Overview and StatusOverview and Status►►Some early resultsSome early results►►Monitoring (time permitting)Monitoring (time permitting)

    Presented by Michael Bosilovich, GSFC, January 5, 2009

  • NASANASA’’s Modern Era Retrospectives Modern Era Retrospective--analysis for analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA)Research and Applications (MERRA)

    ►► RetrospectiveRetrospective--analyses use a fixed Global Atmospheric analyses use a fixed Global Atmospheric Model and Data Assimilation System to analyze the Model and Data Assimilation System to analyze the historical satellite and conventional data records into a historical satellite and conventional data records into a continuous global gridded data set including a multitude continuous global gridded data set including a multitude of ancillary weather and climate diagnosticsof ancillary weather and climate diagnostics

    ►► MERRA uses the latest release of the GMAO Global Earth MERRA uses the latest release of the GMAO Global Earth Observing System Data Assimilation System (GEOSObserving System Data Assimilation System (GEOS--5) 5) and will analyze the period from 1979 and will analyze the period from 1979 –– present, present, assimilating satellite radiances and conventional assimilating satellite radiances and conventional observationsobservations

    ►► A NASA contribution to CCSP Synthesis and Assessment A NASA contribution to CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.3: ReProduct 1.3: Re--analyses of historical climate data for analyses of historical climate data for key atmospheric features. Implications for attribution of key atmospheric features. Implications for attribution of causes of observed change.causes of observed change.

  • 3

    Years inStream

    MERRA 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08Stream 1 10Stream 2 10Stream 3 9ROSB 21G5-AMIP 26EOS

    NovNOAA-18

    EOS AquaOct

    F08

    F15

    SSM/IJul Dec

    F10Nov

    DecF11

    Dec

    DecF13

    MayF14

    May

    Dec Aug

    Apr Jul

    Apr Jun

    Jul

    GOES-08

    GOES-10

    GOES-12

    TIROS-NDec Feb

    Jul Apr OctNovNOAA-6

    FebSep NOAA-7

    May Jun Jul OctNOAA-8

    Jan NovNOAA-9

    NOAA-10Dec Sep

    Nov Jan Sep Sep NOAA-11

    JunSep NOAA-12

    Satellite Radiance Data Streams

    JanNOAA-14

    SepNOAA-15NovNOAA-16

    JulNOAA-17

    Dec

    TOVS

    ATOVS

    EOS Aqua

    GOESSounders

    MERRA will analyze radiances from these satellites, and also several satellite retrieved data products as well as conventional observations (e.g. sondes)

  • The Changing Observing SystemThe Changing Observing System

    1973 – 77K Obs every 6hrs

    1979 – 325K Obs every 6hrs

    1987 – 550K Obs every 6hrs

    2006 – 4.2M Obs every 6hrs

  • NASANASA’’s Modern Era Retrospectives Modern Era Retrospective--analysis for analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA)Research and Applications (MERRA)

    ►► Objective: To improve the water cycle representation Objective: To improve the water cycle representation in reanalyses, and support NASA Earth science and in reanalyses, and support NASA Earth science and application activitiesapplication activities

    ►► 19791979--present (continuing as it is feasible)present (continuing as it is feasible)►► ½½°° horizontal resolution (horizontal resolution (7272 model levels, model levels, sfcsfc--stratstrat))►► 1 hourly1 hourly surface and 2D diagnostic datasurface and 2D diagnostic data►► 6 hourly 36 hourly 3--Dimensional atmospheric analysisDimensional atmospheric analysis►► >150 >150 TbsTbs online storage, many portalsonline storage, many portals►► Production Began May 2008 (complete FallProduction Began May 2008 (complete Fall--2009)2009)►► Home Home -- http://http://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/merragmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/merra//►► Data Data -- http://http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.govdisc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/MDISC//MDISC/►► Discussion Discussion -- http://merrahttp://merra--reanalysis.blogspot.comreanalysis.blogspot.com//

  • MERRA ValidationMERRA Validation

    ►►Experiment Review, Nov 2007Experiment Review, Nov 2007►►Included Short Experiments at native Included Short Experiments at native

    resolution (9 months was the longest)resolution (9 months was the longest)Long experiment with coarse resolution (Scout)Long experiment with coarse resolution (Scout)

    ►►Radiation, clouds, precipitation, surface Radiation, clouds, precipitation, surface temperature, UTH, general circulationtemperature, UTH, general circulation

    ►►Data sources: SRB, CERES, MODIS, GPCP Data sources: SRB, CERES, MODIS, GPCP existing reanalysesexisting reanalyses

    ►►Increments (e.g. PIncrements (e.g. P--E), Indian MonsoonE), Indian Monsoon

  • MERRA Production StatusMERRA Production Status

    ►► This figure is updated regularly at: This figure is updated regularly at: http://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/merra/progresshttp://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/merra/progress--events.phpevents.php

    Nearly 17 years complete

    shipping to DISC

  • Effect of Water Vapor AnalysisEffect of Water Vapor Analysis

  • MERRA MERRA PrecipPrecip Taylor DiagramsTaylor Diagrams

    ►► See also: Bosilovich et al (2008, JAMC)See also: Bosilovich et al (2008, JAMC)

  • Zonal Mean Specific HumidityZonal Mean Specific Humidity

    ERA 40 JRA25

  • BasinBasin--scale Precipitationscale Precipitation

    ►► CPC US CPC US ¼¼ gridded gauge datagridded gauge data►► Daily, Jan 1 Daily, Jan 1 –– Sep 30 2004Sep 30 2004►► Consider all of the Mississippi River Basin domainConsider all of the Mississippi River Basin domain►► Comparison with CEOP MultiComparison with CEOP Multi--Models in Poster sessionModels in Poster session

    GEOS5

  • Analysis

    JanJan--Sep 2004 Sep 2004 Daily MRB Daily MRB

    PrecipitationPrecipitation►►MRB is in the heart of MRB is in the heart of a data rich region for a data rich region for analysesanalyses►►Precipitation is Precipitation is independent (not independent (not assimilated)assimilated)►►In general, Models In general, Models have different have different characterscharacters►►Most overestimate Most overestimate high rain eventshigh rain events►►BMRC excessively dry BMRC excessively dry summersummer►►GEOS5 slight under GEOS5 slight under estimate, but otherwise estimate, but otherwise comparable with the comparable with the bestbest

    NCEP CPTEC

    BMRC

    JMA

    ECPC-SFMMSC

    UKMO ECPC-RII

    Mississippi River Basin PrecipitationG

    auge

    Obse

    rvat

    ions

    GEOS5

  • MERRA: Missouri and Ohio LCL, MERRA: Missouri and Ohio LCL, Wetness and Wetness and PrecipPrecip

    Following A. Betts et al. compare soil wetness with LCL and precipitation to estimate land/atm coupling

    The LCL is not sensitive to soil wetness over the Ohio, and a bit more over the Missouri

  • Cloud Albedo, a SW cloud forcing diagnostic (Betts et al)

    MERRA underestimates the maximum range of both ISSCP observations and ERA40 over the Missouri

  • 0-6Z 6-12Z 12-18Z 18-0Z

    GEOS5GEOS5

    JRAJRA

    NCEP R1NCEP R1

    NCEP R2NCEP R2

    EC-OPSEC-OPS

    TRMMTRMM

    Diurnal Cycle of PrecipitationDiurnal Cycle of Precipitation

  • 14.44.114.44.6NCEP2 - CERES

    11.5-0.911.4-0.5NCEP1 - CERES

    10.315.89.016.2JRA25 - CERES

    6.87.67.38.9ECOPS - CERES

    12.82.59.15.4MERRA - CERES

    2.5-0.72.4-0.8CERES Terra -Aqua

    STDAveSTDAve

    Jul, 2004Jan, 2004TOA LW difference

    (W/m2)

    •All reanalyses get similar patterns as observation.•The difference between observations can be a reference for the uncertainty in reanalyses.•For all reanalyses, strongest error happens over tropical convective regions.•MERRA TOA LW flux bias mean and standard deviation are moderate among reanalyses.

    TOA LW comparison

    of reanalyses

    TOA LW TOA LW comparison comparison

    of of reanalysesreanalyses

    From Junye Chen

  • •LW-SW Joint Frequency Distribution (JFD) shows the relationship of LW and SW under different atmospheric states.•The shape and location of MERRA LW-SW JFD is closer to CERES observation, while the MERRA pattern is a little stretched.

    •From Junye Chen

    TOA LWTOA LW--SW Joint Freq. DistributionSW Joint Freq. Distribution

  • Trends in the Water and Energy CyclesTrends in the Water and Energy Cycles

    ►► Global P trend mostly Global P trend mostly over Ocean, and over Ocean, and corresponds to corresponds to QvQvIncrementsIncrements

    ►► AtmAtm Latent heating Latent heating variations antivariations anti--correlated correlated to heating incrementsto heating increments

    Precipitation

    2.00

    2.20

    2.40

    2.60

    2.80

    3.00

    3.20

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    mm

    day

    -1 GlobalLandOcean

    Water Vapor Increments

    -0.30

    -0.20

    -0.10

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    mm

    day

    -1 GlobalLandOcean

    Global Heating Rates (W m-2)

    60.0

    65.0

    70.0

    75.0

    80.0

    85.0

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    MST

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    AN

    A MoistProcessesAnalysis

  • Net Surface and TOA ImbalanceNet Surface and TOA Imbalance

    ►► Global surface net imbalance is improving in time, Global surface net imbalance is improving in time, mostly changing over Oceanmostly changing over Ocean

    ►► The Ocean net imbalance is decreasing in The Ocean net imbalance is decreasing in incoming SW radiation and increasing LEincoming SW radiation and increasing LE

    Ocean Sfc Anomalies (W m-2)

    -8.0

    -6.0

    -4.0

    -2.0

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    LEHsSWdnLWdn

    Net Heating Sfc and TOA

    -15.0

    -10.0

    -5.0

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    W m

    -2 SfcTOASFC LTOA LSFC OTOA O

  • ►► Complete budgets Complete budgets are available are available including all including all tendencies and tendencies and analysis incrementsanalysis increments

    ►► Water (all phases), Water (all phases), Ozone, KE, Enthalpy, Ozone, KE, Enthalpy, IncludedIncluded

    ►► Also, landAlso, land--only only budgetsbudgets

    ►► Tremendous effort Tremendous effort by Max Suarez, by Max Suarez, Larry Larry TakacsTakacs and and Randy Randy KosterKoster

    Vertically-Integrated Water Vapor Budget for July 1993Vertically-Integrated Water Vapor Budget for July 1993

    ANAtqvqvPE

    tqv

    ∂∂

    +⋅∇−−=∂∂

  • Presidents Day Snow Feb 19, 1979Presidents Day Snow Feb 19, 1979

    ►►Much fewer observations early in the Much fewer observations early in the record, still weather can be reasonablerecord, still weather can be reasonable

    GOES IR 17:30Z19FEB1979

    (Barbs every other grid space)

  • Andrew Aug 24, 1992Andrew Aug 24, 1992

    ►► MERRA analyzed center is south of observed MERRA analyzed center is south of observed

  • Andrew Aug 24, 1992Andrew Aug 24, 1992

    ►►Contaminated ERS1 data is usedContaminated ERS1 data is used►►Resolution still too coarse for small Resolution still too coarse for small TCsTCs

  • Scout SBUV Assimilation Statistics, Mar 1992

  • Ozone response to questionable data Ozone response to questionable data Increments OzoneIncrements Ozone

  • Flawed sounding: Flawed sounding: AzoresAzores

    ►►19791979--1980: A 1980: A persistent sounding persistent sounding west of Portugal is west of Portugal is very different from very different from others nearbyothers nearby

    ►►The result is a The result is a persistent counterpersistent counter--increment that affects increment that affects energeticsenergetics and and moisture budgets moisture budgets

  • MERRA MERRA OnOn--Line Line

    AtlasAtlas►► Updated regularly Updated regularly

    with monthly with monthly comparisons versus comparisons versus existing reanalyses existing reanalyses and some global and some global observed data setsobserved data sets

    ►► More comparisons More comparisons being added and will being added and will be redone at the be redone at the completion of MERRAcompletion of MERRA

    ►► Beta Version: Beta Version: Comments WelcomeComments Welcome

    http://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/merra/prequel/view.php

  • Example figures from the AtlasExample figures from the Atlas500mb Eddy Height vs JRA25

    Precipitation Taylor Diagram, All Reanalyses using GPCP as the reference

  • MERRA_Validation_Water-Energy-1MERRA_Validation_Water-Energy