new mexico regulatory differences summary - stp...
TRANSCRIPT
NEW MEXICO
Regulatory Differences Summary
1. Introduction
Applicability
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-1 - 2/18
.
This summary provides a brief review of New Mexico’s occupational health and safety regulations forthe following topics:
• Posting and Recordkeeping, 29 CFR 1903 and 29 CFR 1904;
• Walking and Working Surfaces, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart D;
• Exit Routes, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E;
• Powered Platforms, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart F;
• Occupational Health, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart G;
• Hazardous Materials, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart H (including HAZWOPER);
• Personal Protective Equipment, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart I;
• General Environmental Controls, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart J (including confined spaces andlockout/tagout);
• Medical and First Aid, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart K;
• Fire Protection, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart L;
• Compressed Air Receivers, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart M;
• Materials Handling and Storage, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N;
• Machinery and Machine Guarding, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart O;
• Handheld Tools, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart P;
• Welding, Cutting, and Brazing, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart Q;
• Electrical Safety, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart S;
• Toxic and Hazardous Substances, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart Z (including chemical exposures andhazard communication); and
• Special Industries, 29 CFR 1910 Subpart R.
The purpose of this summary is twofold: to identify key state regulatory requirements in New Mexicothat are more stringent than the federal regulations, and to identify any additional state programs orrequirements that may apply to industrial operations in these topic areas but that have no federalequivalent.
This summary is designed to serve as a supplement to OSHA Auditing Facilities: Federal ComplianceGuide, prepared by Specialty Technical Consultants (STC), and OSHA Compliance: A Simplified Guide,prepared by Touchstone Environmental, both published by Specialty Technical Publishers (STP). Thesummary should be used in conjunction with either of those documents when performing an audit ormanaging compliance at a facility in New Mexico.
Overall Regulatory Structure
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-2 - 2/18
New Mexico is a state-plan state, having been delegated authority by OSHA to administer its ownoccupational health and safety program. The state program is regulated by New Mexico’s EnvironmentDepartment (NMED), Occupational Health and Safety Bureau (OHSB). New Mexico has adopted thefederal OSHA standards at 29 CFR 1910 into NMAC 11.5.2.9.
2. Agency Contact Information
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Region 6
New Mexico Department of Health
New Mexico Environment Department
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-3 - 2/18
This reference section provides contact information for all federal and state agencies mentioned in thisNew Mexico Regulatory Differences Summary. The first contact information is for the regional federalOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) office. Contact information for state agencies,in alphabetical order, follows the OSHA information.
New Mexico falls within federal OSHA Region 6, which has headquarters in Dallas. Region 6’sAlbuquerque office has been closed, so the El Paso (Texas) area office offers assistance to facilities inNew Mexico.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Region 6(972) 850-4145El Paso Area Office: (915) 534-6251www.osha.gov
The New Mexico Department of Health oversees the state program for automated external defibrillators(AEDs).
New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Emergency Medical Systems(505) 476-8200https://nmhealth.org/about/erd/emsb/AEDs: http://nmhealth.org/about/erd/emsb/aed/
The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), Occupational Health and Safety Bureau (OHSB),oversees the state occupational safety and health program. OHSB also offers an OSHA consultationservice that employers can use to obtain information and reviews of their facility against the federalOSHA standard. NMED's Air Quality Bureau administers regulations for asbestos abatement and itsRadiation Control Bureau oversees ionizing radiation.
New Mexico Environment Department(800) 219-6157https://www.env.nm.gov/
Occupational Health and Safety Bureau(505) 476-8700https://www.env.nm.gov/Ohsb_Website/index.htmConsultation: https://www.env.nm.gov/Ohsb_Website/Cooperative/index.htm
Asbestos(800) 224-7009https://www.env.nm.gov/aqb/asbestos/index.html
Radiation(505) 476-8600https://www.env.nm.gov/nmrcb/home.html
New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department
State Fire Marshal
City of Albuquerque, Air Quality Division
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-4 - 2/18
The New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department, Construction Industries and ManufacturedHousing Division, administers the state’s liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) standard and oversees boilersand pressure vessels.
New Mexico Regulation and Licensing DepartmentConstruction Industries and Manufactured Housing Division(505) 476-4700http://www.rld.state.nm.us/construction/
The State Fire Marshal (within the Public Regulation Commission) oversees state fire protectionregulations.
Public Regulation CommissionState Fire Marshal DivisionToll Free: (800) 244-6702 (in New Mexico only)http://www.nmprc.state.nm.us/state-firemarshal/index.html
The City of Albuquerque's Air Quality Division (AQD) regulates asbestos in Bernalillo County.
City of Albuquerque, Environmental Health DepartmentAir Quality Division(505) 768-1972http://www.cabq.gov/airquality
3. Posting and Recordkeeping
Posting
Recordkeeping
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-5 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
New Mexico’s posting requirements are found at NMAC 11.5.1.17 and NMAC 11.5.1.24of the statecode; they are identical to the federal requirements at 29 CFR 1903.
New Mexico’s recordkeeping requirements are found at NMAC 11.5.1.16 of the state code; they areidentical to the federal requirements at 29 CFR 1904 with the following exception:
• Fatalities and multiple hospitalization accidents must be reported to the New MexicoEnvironment Department, Occupational Health and Safety Bureau by telephone, telegraph, or fax(NMAC 11.5.1.16).
4. Walking and Working Surfaces
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-6 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for walking and working surfaces at 29 CFR 1910.21 – 1910.30 apply in NewMexico. There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss stairs, ladders,scaffolding, and guarding floor and wall openings and holes.)
5. Exit Routes
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-7 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for exit routes at 29 CFR 1910.36 and 29 CFR 1910.37 apply in New Mexico.There are no additional state requirements.
6. Powered Platforms, Manlifts, and Vehicle-Mounted Work
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-8 - 2/18
Platforms
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for powered platforms, manlifts, and vehicle-mounted work platforms at 29 CFR1910 Subpart F (29 CFR 1910.66 – 1910.68) apply in New Mexico. There are no additional staterequirements.
7. Occupational Health
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-9 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for occupational health at 29 CFR 1910.94 – 1910.97 apply in New Mexico.There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss ventilation, noise exposure,and non-ionizing radiation.)
8. Hazardous Materials
Flammable Liquids
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-10 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for hazardous materials at 29 CFR 1910.101 – 1910.111 and 29 CFR1910.120 – 1910.126 apply in New Mexico. There are no additional state requirements, except forflammable liquids and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). (The federal regulations discuss compressed gas,acetylene, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrous oxide, flammable liquids, spray finishing, dip tanks, explosives,liquefied petroleum gas, anhydrous ammonia, and hazardous waste operations and emergency response[HAZWOPER].)
New Mexico has adopted requirements for registration, installation, modification, repair, and closure orremoval of many petroleum ASTs, as well as requirements for release detection, recordkeeping, andfinancial responsibility. These requirements are found within the state’s regulations at New MexicoAdministrative Code (NMAC) at Title 20, Chapter 5.
• For detailed information on petroleum AST requirements in New Mexico at NMAC 20.5.1.7, seethe New Mexico Environmental State Differences Summary, Section 8 (Oil Spill Prevention andAboveground Storage Tanks).
The federal regulations for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) at 29 CFR 1910.110 apply in New Mexico.The New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department’s LP Gas Bureau enforces additionalregulations at NMAC 19.15.40. Key requirements include the following:
• The New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Deparment’s LP Gas Bureau (the Bureau) has alsoadopted the most current version of the following NFPA standards (NMAC 19.15.40):
– NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code; and
– NFPA 58 (2002), Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases.
• Written approval must be received before equipment for the transfer of LPG is installed (NMAC19.15.40.11(A)).
• Each bulk storage plant facility, dispensing station, vehicle fuel dispenser, and cargo container,as well as safety equipment on each vehicular unit used for transportation of LPG in bulkquantities, is subject to annual inspection by the Bureau. All such equipment must display thecurrent inspection decal (NMAC 19.15.40.10(A)).
• Any accident/incident where LPG in any form or any application may have been a factor orcould become a contributing factor must be reported immediately to the Bureau (NMAC19.15.40.13(A)).
• In all cases where a disconnection is made, notice must be given to the consumer by theinspector. It is unlawful for any person other than a licensed installer to reconnect or use anysegment of the installation (NMAC 19.15.40.13(B)).
9. Personal Protective Equipment
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-11 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for personal protective equipment at 29 CFR 1910.132 – 1910.138 apply in NewMexico. There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss generalrequirements, eye and face protection, respirators, head protection, foot protection, electrical protectiveequipment, and hand protection.)
10. General Environmental Controls
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-12 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for general environmental controls at 29 CFR 1910.141 – 1910.147 apply inNew Mexico. There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss sanitation,temporary labor camps, nonwater carriage disposal systems, marking of physical hazards, signs andtags, confined spaces, and lockout/tagout.)
11. Medical and First Aid
Automated External Defibrillators
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-13 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal medical and first aid regulations at 29 CFR 1910.151 apply in New Mexico with noadditional state requirements. State requirements for automated external defibrillators are describedbelow.
• Any workplace in New Mexico that acquires an automated external defibrillator (AED) mustensure that all of the following requirements are met (NMSA 24-10C-4):
– A physician or medical director must oversee all aspects of the AED program (includingtraining, emergency medical services coordination, protocol approval, and defibrillatordeployment strategies). This person must also provide overall quality assurance and revieweach case in which the AED is used.
– Trained targeted responders must receive training in CPR and AED use from a nationallyrecognized course (or other course) approved by the Department of Health.
– The defibrillator must be maintained and tested according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
– Any person who renders emergency care or treatment of a person in cardiac arrest by usingan AED must activate the emergency medical services system as soon as possible and reportany clinical use of the AED to the physician or medical director.
– The AED program must be registered with the Department of Health.
– The local emergency medical services and local 911 agencies must be notified of the AEDprogram.
12. Fire Protection
Fire Code
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-14 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for fire protection at 29 CFR 1910 Subpart L (29 CFR 1910.155 – 1910.165)apply in New Mexico. See below for a discussion of state and local fire codes that have been adopted.
The New Mexico State Fire Marshal has adopted IFC (2003), with state revisions, as the state fire codefor new construction and has adopted NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 (1997) for existing facilities (NMAC10.25.5.8 and http://www.nmprc.state.nm.us/state-firemarshal/code-enforcement/index.html).
Individual jurisdictions may adopt fire protection requirements that are more stringent or comprehensivethan NMAC 10.25.5, as long as the requirements do not conflict with the state rules. Therefore, theauditor or facility compliance assurance manager should check with the local jurisdiction to determine ifany local additions to the state fire code have been adopted and are being enforced locally.
13. Compressed Air Receivers, Boilers and Pressure Vessels
Compressed Air Receivers
Boilers and Pressure Vessels
Code Adoption
Exemptions
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-15 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for compressed air receivers at 29 CFR 1910.169 apply in New Mexico. Thereare no additional state requirements.
The New Mexico Regulation & Licensing Department regulates boilers in New Mexico. The NewMexico Code applies only to boilers. The full requirements are found at NMAC 14.9.4.
• The state has adopted the 1991 editions of the Uniform Plumbing Code and the UniformMechanical Code for boilers already existing prior to January 1, 1998 (NMAC 14.9.4.8(A) –14.9.4.8(B)).
• The state has adopted the following sections of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers'Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, with addenda and interpretations, for boilers installed afterJanuary 1, 1998 (NMAC 14.9.4.12(A)).
– Section I, Rules for Construction of Power Boilers;
– Section IV, Rules for Construction of Heating Boilers; and
– Section IX, Welding and Brazing Qualifications.
• The state has adopted the National Boiler Inspection Code (NBIC) for boilers installed afterJanuary 1, 1998 (NMAC 14.9.4.12(A)).
• Cities that have adopted a boiler code in substantial compliance with the State Boiler Code mayenforce the provisions of the city code within their jurisdictions (NMAC 14.9.4.15).
• Certain equipment is exempt from all requirements. Exempted equipment includes the following:
– listed and approved potable water heaters that are ≤ 120 gallons, 200,000 BTU, 160 psig, and250°F (NMAC 14.9.4.14(A));
– tanks connected to sprinkler(s) (NMAC 14.9.4.14(B));
– portable unfired pressure vessels that are constructed to DOT and ICC regulations and areused in such service (NMAC 14.9.4.14(C));
– containers for liquefied petroleum gases, bulk oxygen, and medical gas (NMAC14.9.4.14(D));
– unfired pressure vessels that are ≤ 5 cubic feet and 250 psig (NMAC 14.9.4.14(E)); and
– pressure vessels used in refrigeration systems (NMAC 14.9.4.14(F)).
Installation Requirements
Inspection Requirements
Registration Requirements
Miscellaneous General Requirements
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-16 - 2/18
• A permit must be obtained before any boiler is installed or reinstalled (NMAC 14.9.4.9(A)).
• Owner/user inspectors are not required to have permits issued for repairs, alterations, orinstallations (NMAC 14.9.4.9(B)).
• Emergency boiler installation may be performed during non-business hours provided a permit isrequested on the next regular business day (NMAC 14.9.4.9(E)).
• All boilers that are relocated, with or without a change of ownership, must be installed incompliance with ASME as a new installation (NMAC 14.9.4.13(B)).
• Used boilers from within New Mexico, another state, or another country must be approved bythe Construction Industries and Manufactured Housing Division (CID) of the New MexicoRegulation and Licensing Department. Such boilers must bear the standard stamping of ASMEand the national board registration number (NMAC 14.9.4.13(C)).
• High-pressure boilers and steam generators must be inspected internally annually. A certificateinspection may be issued with an external inspection; however, an internal inspection must bemade within six months of the external inspection. When the construction does not permit aninternal inspection, one external inspection annually is required (NMAC 14.9.4.25(A)).
• Direct-fire steam jacketed kettles, low-pressure steam boilers, and low-pressure hot water heatingboilers must be inspected internally and externally every 24 months (NMAC 14.9.4.25(B)).
• If a hydrostatic test is deemed necessary, the test must be performed by the owner/user of theboiler and witnessed by the special inspector (NMAC 14.9.4.25(E)).
• The owner/user must prepare the boiler for inspection in accordance with certain requirements(NMAC 14.9.4.27 and NMAC 14.9.4.28).
• All boilers, except cast iron boilers, must be registered with the National Board and assigned anational board registration number (NMAC 14.9.4.12(B)).
• All repairs must be made by authorized organizations (NMAC 14.9.4.16(A) and 14.9.4.16(C)).
• No repair/alteration by welding may be made without the approval of CID or a national boardcommissioned inspector (NMAC 14.9.4.16(D)).
• In case of boiler accident (fire or waterside) or other serious damage to a boiler, CID and theinsurance company must be notified immediately by the owner/user. No equipment may beremoved or their positions changed unless necessary for the protection of life or limb until thestate- or a national-board-commissioned inspector has made an investigation (NMAC 14.9.4.17).
• The certificate of compliance operating permit or a copy must be conspicuously placed so it canbe readily identified with the boiler and must be posted in the boiler or mechanical room. Thecertificate of compliance operating permit for a portable boiler must be attached to the boiler andaccessible at all times (NMAC 14.9.4.18(D)).
• Constant attendance of a boiler with automatic controls is not required. However, there must bea properly licensed individual responsible for the safe operation of the equipment. The boileroperator must perform certain duties (NMAC 14.9.4.20(A)).
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-17 - 2/18
• Any boiler that is not considered an automatic boiler and is located in a publicly owned place ofpublic assembly must have a full-time, licensed operator (NMAC 14.9.4.20(B)).
• Boilers must be located and equipped so that an exit is available to permit safe and quick escapeof any person in case of emergency. The means of egress must include permanent stairs orladders from boiler tops and elevated devices located more than 8 feet above the floor, walkway,or platform (NMAC 14.9.4.33(A)).
• Water columns or gauge glasses located over 10 feet above the floor or a walkway must beprovided with a suitable platform beneath them; the platforms do not need a permanent means ofegress (NMAC 14.9.4.33(B)).
• No person may attempt to remove or do any work on any safety appliance while the appliance issubject to pressure (NMAC 14.9.4.38(A)).
• Should any safety appliance be removed for repair during an outage of a boiler, it must bereinstalled and in proper working order before the boiler is again placed in service (NMAC14.9.4.38(B)).
14. Materials Handling and Storage
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-18 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for materials handling and storage at 29 CFR 1910.176 – 1910.184 apply inNew Mexico. There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss generalrequirements; rim wheels; industrial trucks; overhead and gantry cranes; crawler, locomotive, and wheelcranes; derricks; helicopter cranes; and slings.)
15. Machinery and Machine Guarding
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-19 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal machinery and machine guarding regulations at 29 CFR 1910.211 – 1910.219 apply in NewMexico. There are no additional state requirements. (The federal regulations discuss woodworkingmachinery, abrasive wheel machinery, mills and calendars, mechanical power presses, forging machines,and mechanical power-transmission apparatus.)
16. Handheld Tools
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-20 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for hand and portable powered tools at 29 CFR 1910 Subpart P (29 CFR1910.241 – 1910.244) apply in New Mexico. There are no additional state requirements.
17. Welding, Cutting, and Brazing
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-21 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for welding, cutting, and brazing at 29 CFR 1910 Subpart Q (29 CFR1910.252 – 1910.255) apply in New Mexico. There are no additional state requirements.
18. Electrical Safety
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-22 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for electrical safety at 29 CFR 1910 Subpart S (29 CFR 1910.301 – 1910.399)apply in New Mexico. There are no additional state requirements.
19. Toxic and Hazardous Substances
Asbestos
Lead-Based Paint
Ionizing Radiation
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-23 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations for toxic and hazardous substances at 29 CFR 1910.1000 – 1910.1450 apply inNew Mexico. No further requirements apply, except for asbestos, lead-based paint, radiation, and hazardcommunication. (The federal regulations discuss toxic and hazardous substances, hazardcommunication, and laboratory chemical hygiene.)
The federal OSHA rules at 29 CFR 1910.1001 apply in New Mexico. In addition, New Mexico hasincorporated the U.S. EPA regulations for Hazardous Air Pollutants (including asbestos) at 40 CFR 61(NMAC 20.2.78.9). The New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau (AQB) administersregulations for asbestos abatement. The City of Albuquerque's Air Quality Division oversees asbestosregulation in Bernalillo County. Key provisions include the following:
• Notification to AQB is required for all demolition and for renovation involving the federallyregulated quantities of RACM (http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/asbestos/index.html).
• In Bernalillo County, a person who demolishes or renovates any commercial building, residentialbuilding containing five or more dwellings, or residential structure that will be demolished tobuild a nonresidential structure or building must file an asbestos notification with theAlbuquerque Air Quality Division. The notification must certify the presence or lack thereof ofasbestos (NMAC 20.11.20.22).
New Mexico has not developed any state-specific regulations for lead-based paint. The state followsapplicable federal OSHA and EPA regulations.
The federal regulations at 29 CFR 1910.1096 apply in New Mexico. The state has an agreement withNRC to regulate source material (uranium and thorium), reactor fission byproducts, and quantities ofspecial nuclear materials not sufficient to form a critical mass. These requirements, along with otherregulations relating to ionizing radiation, are administered by the New Mexico Environment Department(NMED) at NMAC 20.3. The regulations are substantially the same as those of NRC. Key differencesinclude the following:
• Licenses must be obtained from NMED (NMAC 20.3.3).
• Radiation machines must be registered with NMED (NMAC 20.3.2).
• Radiation Safety Officers (RSOs) for industrial radiography operations may meet alternaterequirements that are acceptable to the Environment Department (NMAC 20.3.5.11(C)(2)).
Hazard Communication
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-24 - 2/18
The federal regulations for hazard communication apply in New Mexico, with the following exceptions:
• The text at 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(9) is amended to read: “Where employees must travel betweenworkplaces during a workshift, (i.e., their work is carried out at more than one geographicallocation), the material safety data sheets may be kept at a central location at the primaryworkplace facility. In this situation, the employer shall ensure that employees can immediatelyobtain the required information in an emergency. The information shall be readily accessible bytelephone, two-way communication, computer or actual copies of the material safety datasheets.” (NMAC 11.5.2.9)
• The introductory paragraph to 29 CFR 1910.1200(h) is amended to read: “Employers shallprovide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their workarea at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard theemployees have not been trained about is introduced to their work area, with the exception that anew employee shall be deemed to have been trained provided the employer can demonstrate theemployee has received training regarding the same hazards within the past twelve months.Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g. flammability,carcinogenicity or specific chemicals). Chemical-specific information must always be availablethrough labels and material safety data sheets.” (NMAC 11.5.2.9)
20. Special Industries
SDO NEW MEXICO Summary S-25 - 2/18
***The Agency Contact Information section of this New Mexico summary containsphone numbers and web sites of all organizations identified below.***
The federal regulations that cover work practices for special industries such as telecommunications andelectric power at 29 CFR 1910 Subpart R (29 CFR 1910.261 – 1910.272) apply in New Mexico(NMAC 11.5.2.9).
In addition to incorporating these federal standards, New Mexico has also promulgated health and safetystandards that apply specifically to convenience stores (NMAC 11.5.6). These health and safetystandards are not included in the scope of this guide.
Regulatory Differences Checklist
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-1 - 2/18
NEW MEXICO
.
NEW MEXICO Recordkeeping
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-2 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Recordkeeping rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 2-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-3 - 2/18
1. Posting Requirements
2. Recordkeeping Requirements
# FedRef State Difference
2.16 Fatalities and multiple hospitalizationaccidents must be reported to the NewMexico Environment Department,Occupational Health and Safety Bureau bytelephone, telegraph, or fax (NMAC11.5.1.16).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
3. Limited Recordkeeping Requirements for Certain Employers
4. Recording Criteria
5. State and Local Requirements
NEW MEXICO Walking and Working Surfaces
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-4 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Walking and Working Surfacesrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-5 - 2/18
1. General Requirements
2. Ladders
3. Step Bolts and Manhole Steps
4. Stairways
5. Dockboards
6. Scaffolds and Rope Descent Systems
7. Duty to Have Fall Protection and Falling Object Protection
8. Fall Protection Systems and Falling Object Protection – Criteria and Practices
9. Training Requirements
10. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Exit Routes
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-6 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Exit Routes rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-7 - 2/18
1. NFPA 101-2009 (Life Safety Code)
2. Exit Routes
3. Maintenance, Safeguards, and Operational Features for Exit Routes
4. Emergency Action Plans (EAPs)
5. Fire Prevention Plans (FPPs)
6. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Powered Platforms
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-8 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Powered Platforms rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-9 - 2/18
1. Powered Platforms: General
2. New Powered Platforms: Affected Parts of Buildings
3. New Powered Platforms: Equipment
4. Powered Platforms: Inspections and Tests
5. Powered Platforms: Maintenance
6. Powered Platforms: Operations
7. Powered Platforms: Personal Fall Protection
8. Powered Platforms: Existing Installations
9. Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work Platforms
10. Manlifts
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-10 - 2/18
11. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Occupational Health
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-11 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Occupational Health rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-12 - 2/18
1. Ventilation – Abrasive Blasting
2. Ventilation – Grinding, Polishing, and Buffing Operations
3. Ventilation – Spray Finishing Operations
4. Ventilation – Open Surface Tanks
5. Occupational Noise – General
6. Nonionizing Radiation – General
7. State and Local Requirements
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-13 - 2/18
.
Compressed Gases
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Compressed Gases rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-14 - 2/18
1. General
2. Compressed Gases
3. Acetylene
4. Hydrogen
5. Oxygen
6. Nitrous Oxide
7. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-15 - 2/18
Flammable Liquids
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Flammable Liquids rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 3-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-16 - 2/18
1. Containers and Portable Tanks – General
2. Piping, Valves, and Fittings – General
3. Tanks
# FedRef State Difference
S3 For detailed information on petroleum ASTrequirements in New Mexico at NMAC20.5.1.7, see the SPCC Rulebook.
4. Flammable Liquids – Industrial Plants
5. Bulk Plants – General
6. Processing Plants
7. Refineries, Chemical Plants, and Distilleries
8. Wharves at Bulk Plants, Chemical Plants, Refineries, and Distilleries
9. Service Stations
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-17 - 2/18
10. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-18 - 2/18
Spray Finishing Using Flammable and Combustible Materials
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Spray Finishing UsingFlammable and Combustible Materials rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has beendesigned for use with the corresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differencespresented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that linksthem to the specific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note thatsection titles in this checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-19 - 2/18
1. General
2. Electrostatic Hand Spraying
3. Fixed Electrostatic Apparatus
4. Powder Coating
5. Drying, Curing, or Fusion
6. Spray Peroxides
7. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-20 - 2/18
Dip Tanks
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Dip Tanks rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-21 - 2/18
1. General
2. Flammable Liquids
3. Additional Criteria
4. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-22 - 2/18
Explosives
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Explosives rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-23 - 2/18
1. Storage of Explosives
2. Use of Explosives
3. Transport of Explosives
4. Ammonium Nitrate
5. Blasting Agents
6. Water Gel
7. Small Arms
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-24 - 2/18
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Liquefied Petroleum Gasrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
NM 1-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-25 - 2/18
1. General
# FedRef State Difference
S1 The New Mexico Regulation and LicensingDeparment’s LP Gas Bureau (the Bureau)has also adopted the most current version ofthe following NFPA standards (NMAC19.15.40):
– NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code; and
– NFPA 58 (2002), Standard for theStorage and Handling of LiquefiedPetroleum Gases.
NM 1-2 1.11 Written approval must be received beforeequipment for the transfer of LPG isinstalled (NMAC 19.15.40.11(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
2. DOT Cylinder Systems
3. Non–DOT Cylinder Systems
4. Storage of LPG Containers Awaiting Use or Resale
5. Use of LPG as a Motor Fuel
6. Service Stations
NM 7-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-26 - 2/18
7. No Similar Federal Regulation
# FedRef State Difference
S7 Each bulk storage plant facility, dispensingstation, vehicle fuel dispenser, and cargocontainer, as well as safety equipment oneach vehicular unit used for transportationof LPG in bulk quantities, is subject toannual inspection by the Bureau. All suchequipment must display the currentinspection decal (NMAC 19.15.40.10(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 7-2 S7 Any accident/incident where LPG in anyform or any application may have been afactor or could become a contributing factormust be reported immediately to the Bureau(NMAC 19.15.40.13(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 7-3 S7 In all cases where a disconnection is made,notice must be given to the consumer by theinspector. It is unlawful for any person otherthan a licensed installer to reconnect or useany segment of the installation (NMAC19.15.40.13(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NEW MEXICO Hazardous Materials
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-27 - 2/18
Anhydrous Ammonia
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Anhydrous Ammonia rulebookto its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-28 - 2/18
1. General Ammonia Systems
2. Stationary Refrigerated Storage Systems
3. Stationary Nonrefrigerated Storage Systems
4. Systems Using Portable DOT Containers
5. Non–farm Tank Motor Vehicles Carrying Ammonia
6. Ammonia Farm Tank Vehicles (soil)
7. Ammonia Farm Tank Vehicles (non-soil)
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Process Safety
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-29 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Process Safety rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-30 - 2/18
1. Employee Participation
2. Process Safety Information
3. Process Hazard Analysis
4. Operating Procedures
5. Training
6. Contractors
7. Pre-startup Safety Review
8. Mechanical Integrity
9. Hot Work Permit
10. Management of Change (MOC)
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-31 - 2/18
11. Incident Investigation
12. Emergency Planning and Response
13. Compliance Audits
14. Trade Secrets
15. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO HAZWOPER
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-32 - 2/18
.
Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Hazardous Waste CleanupOperations rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-33 - 2/18
1. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Safety and Health Program
2. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Site Characterization and Analysis
3. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Site Control Program
4. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Training
5. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Medical Surveillance
6. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Engineering Controls, Work Practices, and PPE
7. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Monitoring
8. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Informational Programs
9. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Handling Drums and Containers
10. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Decontamination
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-34 - 2/18
11. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Emergency Response by Employees atUncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
12. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Illumination
13. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – Sanitation at Temporary Workplaces
14. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Operations – New Technology Programs
15. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO HAZWOPER
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-35 - 2/18
Emergency Response and Cleanup Operations at TSD Facilities
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Emergency Response andCleanup Operations at TSD Facilities rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has beendesigned for use with the corresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differencespresented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that linksthem to the specific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note thatsection titles in this checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-36 - 2/18
1. Hazardous Waste Emergency Response and Cleanup at TSD Facilities
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO HAZWOPER
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-37 - 2/18
Other Emergency Response Operations
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Other Emergency ResponseOperations rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-38 - 2/18
1. Other Emergency Response Operations
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Personal Protective Equipment
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-39 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Personal Protective Equipmentrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-40 - 2/18
1. Personal Protective Equipment: General Requirements
2. Eye and Face Protection
3. Head Protection
4. Foot Protection
5. Electrical Protective Equipment
6. Hand Protection
7. Respiratory Protection
8. Personal Fall Protection Systems
9. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Confined Space
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-41 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Confined Space rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-42 - 2/18
1. General Requirements
2. Contractors
3. Permit–Required Confined Space Program
4. Permits
5. Training and Duties
6. Rescue Operations and Equipment
7. Program Review
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Lockout and Tagout
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-43 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Lockout and Tagout rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-44 - 2/18
1. General Requirements
2. Application and Release of Energy Controls
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO General Environmental Controls
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-45 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the General Environmental Controlsrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-46 - 2/18
1. Sanitation
2. Temporary Labor Camps
3. Safety Color Code For Marking Physical Hazards
4. Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags
5. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Medical and First Aid
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-47 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Medical and First Aid rulebookto its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 3-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-48 - 2/18
1. Medical Services and First Aid
2. ANSI Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment Standards
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
# FedRef State Difference
S3 Any workplace in New Mexico that acquiresan automated external defibrillator (AED)must ensure that all of the followingrequirements are met (NMSA 24-10C-4):
– A physician or medical director mustoversee all aspects of the AED program(including training, emergency medicalservices coordination, protocol approval,and defibrillator deployment strategies).This person must also provide overallquality assurance and review each casein which the AED is used.
– Trained targeted responders must receivetraining in CPR and AED use from anationally recognized course (or othercourse) approved by the Department ofHealth.
– The defibrillator must be maintained andtested according to the manufacturer'sguidelines.
– Any person who renders emergency careor treatment of a person in cardiac arrestby using an AED must activate theemergency medical services system assoon as possible and report any clinicaluse of the AED to the physician ormedical director.
– The AED program must be registeredwith the Department of Health.
– The local emergency medical servicesand local 911 agencies must be notifiedof the AED program.
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NEW MEXICO Fire Protection
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-49 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Fire Protection rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-50 - 2/18
1. Fire Brigades
2. Fire Extinguishers
3. Standpipe Systems
4. Automatic Sprinkler Systems
5. Fixed Fire Extinguishing Systems
6. Total Flooding Systems
7. Dry Chemical Systems
8. Gas Extinguishing Agent Systems
9. Fixed Systems with Water or Foam
10. Fire Detection Systems
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 12-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-51 - 2/18
11. Employee Alarm Systems
12. State and Local Requirements
# FedRef State Difference
12.1 The New Mexico State Fire Marshal hasadopted IFC (2003), with state revisions, asthe state fire code for new construction andhas adopted NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 (1997)for existing facilities (NMAC 10.25.5.8 andhttp://www.nmprc.state.nm.us/state-firemarshal/code-enforcement/index.html).
NEW MEXICO Compressed Gases
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-52 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Compressed Gases rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 2-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-53 - 2/18
1. Compressed Air Receivers
2. State Requirements for Fired and Unfired Pressure Vessels
# FedRef State Difference
S2 Certain equipment is exempt from allrequirements. Exempted equipment includesthe following (NMAC 14.9.4.14):
– listed and approved potable waterheaters that are ≤ 120 gallons, 200,000BTU, 160 psig, and 250°F (NMAC14.9.4.14(A));
– tanks connected to sprinkler(s) (NMAC14.9.4.14(B));
– portable unfired pressure vessels that areconstructed to DOT and ICC regulationsand are used in such service (NMAC14.9.4.14(C));
– containers for liquefied petroleum gases,bulk oxygen, and medical gas (NMAC14.9.4.14(D));
– unfired pressure vessels that are ≤ 5cubic feet and 250 psig (NMAC14.9.4.14(E)); and
– pressure vessels used in refrigerationsystems (NMAC 14.9.4.14(F)).
NM 2-2 2.1 The state has adopted the 1991 editions ofthe Uniform Plumbing Code and theUniform Mechanical Code for boilersalready existing prior to January 1, 1998(NMAC 14.9.4.8(A) – 14.9.4.8(B)).
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-54 - 2/18
2. State Requirements for Fired and Unfired Pressure Vessels
# FedRef State Difference
NM 2-3 2.1 The state has adopted the following sectionsof the American Society of MechanicalEngineers' Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,with addenda and interpretations, for boilersinstalled after January 1, 1998 (NMAC14.9.4.12(A)).
– Section I, Rules for Construction ofPower Boilers;
– Section IV, Rules for Construction ofHeating Boilers; and
– Section IX, Welding and BrazingQualifications.
NM 2-4 2.1 The state has adopted the National BoilerInspection Code (NBIC) for boilers installedafter January 1, 1998 (NMAC 14.9.4.12(A)).
NM 2-5 2.1 Cities that have adopted a boiler code insubstantial compliance with the State BoilerCode may enforce the provisions of the citycode within their jurisdictions (NMAC14.9.4.15).
NM 2-6 2.1 Emergency boiler installation may beperformed during non-business hoursprovided a permit is requested on the nextregular business day (NMAC 14.9.4.9(E)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-7 2.1 All boilers that are relocated, with orwithout a change of ownership, must beinstalled in compliance with ASME as anew installation (NMAC 14.9.4.13(B)).
NM 2-8 2.1 Used boilers from within New Mexico,another state, or another country must beapproved by the Construction Industries andManufactured Housing Division (CID) ofthe New Mexico Regulation and LicensingDepartment. Such boilers must bear thestandard stamping of ASME and thenational board registration number (NMAC14.9.4.13(C)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-55 - 2/18
2. State Requirements for Fired and Unfired Pressure Vessels
# FedRef State Difference
NM 2-9 2.1 Constant attendance of a boiler withautomatic controls is not required. However,there must be a properly licensed individualresponsible for the safe operation of theequipment. The boiler operator mustperform certain duties (NMAC14.9.4.20(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-10 2.1 Any boiler that is not considered anautomatic boiler and is located in a publiclyowned place of public assembly must have afull-time, licensed operator (NMAC14.9.4.20(B)).
NM 2-11 2.1 Boilers must be located and equipped so thatan exit is available to permit safe and quickescape of any person in case of emergency.The means of egress must includepermanent stairs or ladders from boiler topsand elevated devices located more than 8feet above the floor, walkway, or platform(NMAC 14.9.4.33(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-12 2.1 Water columns or gauge glasses locatedover 10 feet above the floor or a walkwaymust be provided with a suitable platformbeneath them; the platforms do not need apermanent means of egress (NMAC14.9.4.33(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-13 2.2 A permit must be obtained before any boileris installed or reinstalled (NMAC14.9.4.9(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□NM 2-14 2.2 Owner/user inspectors are not required to
have permits issued for repairs, alterations,or installations (NMAC 14.9.4.9(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□NM 2-15 2.2 All boilers, except cast iron boilers, must be
registered with the National Board andassigned a national board registrationnumber (NMAC 14.9.4.12(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-56 - 2/18
2. State Requirements for Fired and Unfired Pressure Vessels
# FedRef State Difference
NM 2-16 2.2 The certificate of compliance operatingpermit or a copy must be conspicuouslyplaced so it can be readily identified withthe boiler and must be posted in the boileror mechanical room. The certificate ofcompliance operating permit for a portableboiler must be attached to the boiler andaccessible at all times (NMAC14.9.4.18(D)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-17 2.3 High-pressure boilers and steam generatorsmust be inspected internally annually. Acertificate inspection may be issued with anexternal inspection; however, an internalinspection must be made within six monthsof the external inspection. When theconstruction does not permit an internalinspection, one external inspection annuallyis required (NMAC 14.9.4.25(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-18 2.3 Direct-fire steam jacketed kettles, low-pressure steam boilers, and low-pressure hotwater heating boilers must be inspectedinternally and externally every 24 months(NMAC 14.9.4.25(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-19 2.3 If a hydrostatic test is deemed necessary, thetest must be performed by the owner/user ofthe boiler and witnessed by the specialinspector (NMAC 14.9.4.25(E)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-20 2.3 The owner/user must prepare the boiler forinspection in accordance with certainrequirements (NMAC 14.9.4.27 and NMAC14.9.4.28).
NM 2-21 2.4 All repairs must be made by authorizedorganizations (NMAC 14.9.4.16(A) and14.9.4.16(C)).
NM 2-22 2.4 No repair/alteration by welding may bemade without the approval of CID or anational board commissioned inspector(NMAC 14.9.4.16(D)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-57 - 2/18
2. State Requirements for Fired and Unfired Pressure Vessels
# FedRef State Difference
NM 2-23 2.4 In case of boiler accident (fire or waterside)or other serious damage to a boiler, CID andthe insurance company must be notifiedimmediately by the owner/user. Noequipment may be removed or theirpositions changed unless necessary for theprotection of life or limb until the state- or anational-board-commissioned inspector hasmade an investigation (NMAC 14.9.4.17).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-24 2.4 No person may attempt to remove or do anywork on any safety appliance while theappliance is subject to pressure (NMAC14.9.4.38(A)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-25 2.4 Should any safety appliance be removed forrepair during an outage of a boiler, it mustbe reinstalled and in proper working orderbefore the boiler is again placed in service(NMAC 14.9.4.38(B)).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Materials Handling
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-58 - 2/18
.
General Requirements and Split Rim Wheels
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the General Requirements and SplitRim Wheels rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-59 - 2/18
1. Materials Handling: General Requirements
2. Rim Wheels
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Materials Handling
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-60 - 2/18
Powered Industrial Trucks
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Powered Industrial Trucksrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-61 - 2/18
1. Powered Industrial Trucks Design and Designations
2. Operating Requirements
3. Maintenance
4. Operator Training
5. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Materials Handling
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-62 - 2/18
Hoisting and Lifting Equipment
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Hoisting and Lifting Equipmentrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-63 - 2/18
1. Overhead and Gantry Cranes
2. Crawler, Locomotive, and Wheel Cranes
3. Derricks
4. Helicopters
5. Slings
6. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Machinery and Machine Guarding
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-64 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Machinery and MachineGuarding rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-65 - 2/18
1. General Requirements for All Machines
2. Woodworking Machinery Requirements
3. Abrasive Wheel Machinery
4. Mills and Calenders in the Rubber and Plastics Industries
5. Mechanical Power Presses
6. Forging Machines
7. Mechanical Power–Transmission Apparatus
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Handheld Tools
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-66 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Handheld Tools rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-67 - 2/18
1. Handheld Tools
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Welding, Cutting, and Brazing
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-68 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Welding, Cutting, and Brazingrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-69 - 2/18
1. General Requirements
2. Oxygen–Fuel Gas Welding and Cutting
3. Arc Welding and Cutting
4. Resistance Welding
5. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Telecommunications
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-70 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Telecommunications rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-71 - 2/18
1. Buildings Containing Telecommunications Centers
2. Battery Handling
3. Medical and First Aid
4. Hazardous Materials
5. Compressed Gas
6. Support Structures
7. Approach Distances to Exposed Energized Overhead Power Lines and Equipment Parts
8. Illumination of Field Work
9. Training
10. Employee Protection in Public Work Areas
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-72 - 2/18
11. Tools and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
12. Rubber Insulating Equipment
13. Personal Climbing Equipment
14. Ladders
15. Other Tools and PPE
16. Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work Platforms
17. Derrick Trucks and Similar Equipment
18. Materials Handling and Storage
19. Cable Fault Locating and Testing
20. Grounding for Employee Protection – Pole Lines
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-73 - 2/18
21. Overhead Lines
22. Underground Lines
23. Microwave Transmission
24. Tree Trimming – Electrical Hazards
25. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-74 - 2/18
.
Distribution
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Electric Power Generation,Transmission, and Distribution rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designedfor use with the corresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presentedhere are numbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them tothe specific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titlesin this checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-75 - 2/18
1. General
2. Medical Services and First Aid
3. Job Briefing
4. Lockout/Tagout Procedures
5. Enclosed Spaces
6. Excavations
7. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
8. Special Ladders and Platforms
9. Hand and Portable Power Tools
10. Live-line Tools
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-76 - 2/18
11. Materials Handling and Storage
12. Working on or Near Exposed Energized Lines or Equipment
13. De-energizing Lines and Equipment for Employee Protection
14. Grounding for the Protection of Employees
15. Testing and Test Facilities
16. Mechanical Equipment
17. Overhead Lines and Live-line Barehand Work
18. Line-Clearance Tree-Trimming
19. Communication Facilities
20. Underground Electric Installations
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-77 - 2/18
21. Substations
22. Power Generation
23. Special Conditions
24. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-78 - 2/18
.
Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Pulp, Paper, and PaperboardMills rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-79 - 2/18
1. Safe Practices
2. Handling and Storage of Pulpwood and Pulp Chips
3. Handling and Storage of Other Raw Materials
4. Preparing Pulpwood
5. Rag and Old Paper Preparation
6. Chemical Processes of Making Pulp
7. Bleaching
8. Mechanical Pulp Process
9. Stock Preparation
10. Machine Room
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-80 - 2/18
11. Finishing Room
12. Materials Handling
13. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-81 - 2/18
Textiles
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Textiles rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-82 - 2/18
1. General Safety Requirements
2. Safeguards for Specific Machines
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-83 - 2/18
Bakeries
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Bakeries rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-84 - 2/18
1. General Machine Guarding
2. Safeguards for Specific Machines
3. Biscuit and Cracker Equipment
4. Ovens
5. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-85 - 2/18
Sawmills
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Sawmills rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-86 - 2/18
1. Building Facilities and Isolated Equipment
2. Log Handling, Sorting, and Storage
3. Log Breakdown and Related Machinery and Facilities
4. Dry Kilns and Facilities
5. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-87 - 2/18
Laundry Machinery and Operations
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Laundry Machinery andOperations rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-88 - 2/18
1. Safe Practices for Equipment
2. Employee Training
3. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-89 - 2/18
Grain Handling Operations
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Grain Handling Operationsrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-90 - 2/18
1. Emergency Preparation and Response
2. Training Requirements
3. Hot Work Operations
4. Entrance Procedures
5. Contractor Safety
6. Housekeeping and Maintenance Equipment and Procedures
7. Grain Elevators
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Special Industries
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-91 - 2/18
Other State-Specific Special Industries
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Other State-Specific SpecialIndustries rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-92 - 2/18
1. State–Specific Special Industries
NEW MEXICO Electrical Safety
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-93 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Electrical Safety rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-94 - 2/18
1. General Requirements
2. Wiring Design and Protection
3. Wiring Methods, Components, and Equipment for General Use
4. Specific Purpose Equipment and Installations
5. Hazardous (Classified) Locations
6. Special Systems
7. Safety-Related Work Practices – Scope
8. Training
9. Selection and Use of Work Practices
10. Use of Equipment
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-95 - 2/18
11. Safeguards for Personnel Protection
12. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Diving
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-96 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Diving rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-97 - 2/18
1. Qualifications of Dive Team
2. General Operations Procedures
3. Specific Operations Procedures
4. Equipment Procedures and Requirements
5. Recordkeeping
6. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazard Communication
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-98 - 2/18
.
Hazard Communication Standard
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Hazard CommunicationStandard rulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with thecorresponding federal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here arenumbered both sequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to thespecific analogous question in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles inthis checklist are identical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 5-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-99 - 2/18
1. Facilities with Limited Requirements
2. Hazard Classification
3. Written Hazard Communication Program
4. Labels and Other Forms of Warning
5. Safety Data Sheets (SDSs)
# FedRef State Difference
5.9 The text at 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(9) isamended to read: “Where employees musttravel between workplaces during aworkshift, (i.e., their work is carried out atmore than one geographical location), thematerial safety data sheets may be kept at acentral location at the primary workplacefacility. In this situation, the employer shallensure that employees can immediatelyobtain the required information in anemergency. The information shall be readilyaccessible by telephone, two-waycommunication, computer or actual copiesof the material safety data sheets.” (NMAC11.5.2.9)
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 6-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-100 - 2/18
6. Employee Information and Training
# FedRef State Difference
S6 The introductory paragraph to 29 CFR1910.1200(h) is amended to read:“Employers shall provide employees witheffective information and training onhazardous chemicals in their work area atthe time of their initial assignment, andwhenever a new physical or health hazardthe employees have not been trained aboutis introduced to their work area, with theexception that a new employee shall bedeemed to have been trained provided theemployer can demonstrate the employee hasreceived training regarding the same hazardswithin the past twelve months. Informationand training may be designed to covercategories of hazards (e.g. flammability,carcinogenicity or specific chemicals).Chemical-specific information must alwaysbe available through labels and materialsafety data sheets.” (NMAC 11.5.2.9)
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
7. Trade Secrets
8. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazard Communication
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-101 - 2/18
Chemical Hygiene Standard
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Chemical Hygiene Standardrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-102 - 2/18
1. Chemical Hygiene Standard
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Hazard Communication
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-103 - 2/18
DOT Marking
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the DOT Marking rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-104 - 2/18
1. Retention of DOT Markings, Placards, and Labels
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-105 - 2/18
.
Air Contaminants
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Air Contaminants rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-106 - 2/18
1. Chemical Exposure – Air Contaminants
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-107 - 2/18
Asbestos
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Asbestos rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 2-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-108 - 2/18
1. Asbestos
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
# FedRef State Difference
S2 Notification to AQB is required for alldemolition and for renovation involving thefederally regulated quantities of RACM(http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/asbestos/index.html).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NM 2-2 S2 In Bernalillo County, a person whodemolishes or renovates any commercialbuilding, residential building containing fiveor more dwellings, or residential structurethat will be demolished to build anonresidential structure or building must filean asbestos notification with theAlbuquerque Air Quality Division. Thenotification must certify the presence or lackthereof of asbestos (NMAC 20.11.20.22).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-109 - 2/18
13 Carcinogens
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the 13 Carcinogens rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-110 - 2/18
1. 13 Carcinogens
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-111 - 2/18
Vinyl Chloride
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Vinyl Chloride rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-112 - 2/18
1. Vinyl Chloride
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-113 - 2/18
Inorganic Arsenic
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Inorganic Arsenic rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-114 - 2/18
1. Inorganic Arsenic
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-115 - 2/18
Lead
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Lead rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-116 - 2/18
1. Lead
2. Lead-Based Paint: Disclosure for Property Owners or Lessors
3. Lead-Based Paint: Notification and Certification Requirements for Renovators
4. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-117 - 2/18
Chromium (VI)
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Chromium (VI) rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-118 - 2/18
1. Chromium (VI)
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-119 - 2/18
Cadmium
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Cadmium rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-120 - 2/18
1. Cadmium
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-121 - 2/18
Benzene
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Benzene rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-122 - 2/18
1. Benzene
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-123 - 2/18
Coke Oven Emissions
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Coke Oven Emissions rulebookto its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-124 - 2/18
1. Coke Oven Emissions
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-125 - 2/18
Cotton Dust
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Cotton Dust rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-126 - 2/18
1. Cotton Dust
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-127 - 2/18
DBCP
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the DBCP rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-128 - 2/18
1. 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-129 - 2/18
Acrylonitrile
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Acrylonitrile rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-130 - 2/18
1. Acrylonitrile
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-131 - 2/18
Ethylene Oxide
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Ethylene Oxide rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-132 - 2/18
1. Ethylene Oxide
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-133 - 2/18
Formaldehyde
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Formaldehyde rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-134 - 2/18
1. Formaldehyde
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-135 - 2/18
MDA
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the MDA rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-136 - 2/18
1. Methylenedianiline (MDA)
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-137 - 2/18
1,3-Butadiene
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the 1,3-Butadiene rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-138 - 2/18
1. 1,3–Butadiene
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-139 - 2/18
Methylene Chloride
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Methylene Chloride rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-140 - 2/18
1. Methylene Chloride (MC)
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-141 - 2/18
Ionizing Radiation
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Ionizing Radiation rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
NM 2-1
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-142 - 2/18
1. Ionizing Radiation
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
# FedRef State Difference
S2 Licenses must be obtained from NMED(NMAC 20.3.3).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□NM 2-2 S2 Radiation machines must be registered with
NMED (NMAC 20.3.2).N/A
.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□NM 2-3 S2 Radiation Safety Officers (RSOs) for
industrial radiography operations may meetalternate requirements that are acceptable tothe Environment Department (NMAC20.3.5.11(C)(2)).
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-143 - 2/18
Medical Recordkeeping
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Medical Recordkeepingrulebook to its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the correspondingfederal audit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered bothsequentially (in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogousquestion in the federal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist areidentical with the section titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-144 - 2/18
1. Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-145 - 2/18
Respirable Silica
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Respirable Silica rulebook to itsclosest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal auditguide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the“#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-146 - 2/18
1. Exposure Assessment and Control
2. Regulated Areas
3. Methods of Compliance
4. Respiratory Protection
5. Housekeeping
6. Medical Surveillance
7. Communication of Respirable Crystalline Silica Hazards to Employees
8. Recordkeeping
9. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Chemical, Biological, and Physical Exposure Control
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-147 - 2/18
Beryllium
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Beryllium rulebook to its closestfederal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federal audit guide.For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially (in the “#”column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in the federalguide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with the sectiontitles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-148 - 2/18
1. Exposure Assessment and Control
2. Work Areas and Regulated Areas
3. Methods of Compliance
4. Respiratory Protection
5. Personal Protective Clothing and Equipment
6. Hygiene Areas and Practices
7. Housekeeping
8. Medical Surveillance and Medical Removal
9. Communication of Hazards
10. Recordkeeping
NEW MEXICO Bloodborne Pathogens
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-149 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Bloodborne Pathogens rulebookto its closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-150 - 2/18
1. Bloodborne Pathogens
2. No Similar Federal Regulation
NEW MEXICO Radiation Protection
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are information-only items. The
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol are external references. Relatively little
• State differences that are annotated with the symbol indicate that this is an item related to
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-151 - 2/18
.
This checklist links each NEW MEXICO regulatory requirement in the Radiation Protection rulebook toits closest federal regulatory equivalent. It has been designed for use with the corresponding federalaudit guide. For ease of reference, the state differences presented here are numbered both sequentially(in the “#” column) and in terms of the number that links them to the specific analogous question in thefederal guide (in the “Fed-Ref” column). Note that section titles in this checklist are identical with thesection titles used in the federal guide.
Many state differences refer to a specific paragraph statement in the federal audit guide; the number ofthat federal paragraph statement appears in the Fed-Ref column. At times, however, more than one statedifference may link to the same federal paragraph; here the number of that federal paragraph statementappears in the Fed-Ref multiple times. In still other cases, the state difference does not link to a specificquestion in the federal guide, rather it relates to an entire federal rulebook section; these items have theletter S in the Link column along with the section number.
Some state differences have no similar federal requirement to which they refer; these items appear in a“No Similar Federal Requirement” category. Other state differences have no corresponding federalchecklist to which they can be linked; these items are grouped in the “No Corresponding FederalChecklist” category.
We have classified each state difference in terms of how it can best be used for ongoing compliancemanagement and support of an auditing, checking, and corrective action effort.
• State differences that can be audited are accompanied by the terminology N/A, Complies, Does NotComply. These items have been specifically structured for a response of this type during a self-assessment or audit.
information presented here may relate to the status of a state program, give some useful insights intostate approaches to regulatory performance and reporting, or describe the structure of stateregulations.
detail is provided in this state difference guide other than the existence of the state program orregulations, combined with a reference at which more details about this issue can be found. In thiscase, the auditor or compliance manager will have to do further facility-specific investigation todetermine the extent to which this topic relates to the facility in question.
applicability (including potential exemptions from a particular regulatory requirement). The userneeds to use the information provided (often supplemented with further information from other partsof OSHA Auditing Federal Compliance Guide (Facilities) or other sources) to determine whether ornot a regulatory requirement or related issue applies in that situation.
NM 1-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-152 - 2/18
1. Control of General Occupational Exposures
# FedRef State Difference
S1 Licenses must be obtained from NMED(NMAC 20.3.3).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
2. Dose Limits for Individual Members of the Public
3. Radiation Surveys and Monitoring
4. Respiratory Protection and Controls
5. Precautionary Procedures
6. Waste Disposal
7. Reporting
8. Recordkeeping
NM 9-1
NM 10-1
No NEW MEXICO Differences
SDO NEW MEXICO Checklist C-153 - 2/18
9. Radiation Safety Requirements for Industrial Radiographic Operations
# FedRef State Difference
S9 Radiation machines must be registered withNMED (NMAC 20.3.2).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□NM 9-2 9.11 Radiation Safety Officers (RSOs) for
industrial radiography operations may meetalternate requirements that are acceptable tothe Environment Department (NMAC20.3.5.11(C)(2)).
10. No Similar Federal Regulation
# FedRef State Difference
S10 Radiation machines must be registered withNMED (NMAC 20.3.2).
N/A.
□
Complies.
□
Does NotComply
.□
11. No Corresponding Federal Checklist