new paper 1: warfare and british society c1250-present and london … · 2018. 1. 23. · paper 1:...

Paper 1: Warfare and British Society c1250-Present and London and the Second World

War, 1939-45Question Marks Question Type

Section A: London and the Second World War 1939-45 Answer Questions 1 and 2

1 4 marks Describe two features of…

2a 8 marks How useful are Sources _ and _ for…

2b 4 marks How could you follow up Source _ to find out more…

Section B: Warfare and British Society c1250-presentAnswer both questions 3 and 4 and then EITHER 5 or 6

3 4 marks Explain one way in which…. is different…

4 12 marks Explain why …. has changed since…

5/6 16 marks + 4 SPAG

“[insert statement]” How far do you agree? Explain your answer.

QUESTION 1 (4 MARKS)

[POINT] One key feature of… {WFTQ} is…

[EXPLAIN] This is a key feature because… {insert precise own knowledge}


[EXPLAIN] This is a key feature because… {insert precise own knowledge}

QUESTION 2A (8 MARKS)

[POINT] Source _ is more useful for (WFTQ) … because it tells me…

[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this(quote/description of source)…[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…[RELIABILITY] This source is reliablebecause (N.O.P). This means it is reliable because…[POINT] Source _ is less useful for (WFTQ) … because it tells me…

[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this(quote/description of source)…[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…[RELIABILITY] This source is not reliablebecause (N.O.P). This means that it is unreliable because…[CONCLUSION] In my opinion, Source __ is more useful than Source__ because…

QUESTION 2B (4 MARKS)

[POINT] The detail in Source _ that I would follow up to find out more about (WFTQ)… is…

[EXPLAIN] The question I would ask to do this is…

[POINT] The type of Source I could use to do this is…

[EXPLAIN] This type of Source would help me because…


[POINT] One way in which… (WFTQ) was different/similar is…

[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is…

[EXPLAIN] This shows that …


[POINT] One reason why (WFTQ) … is…


[EXPLAIN] This shows that (WFTQ) because…

[POINT] Another reason why (WFTQ) … is…



[POINT] A final reason why (WFTQ) … is…



QUESTION 5/6 (16 MARKS + 4 SPAG)

[POINT] I agree/disagree that [insert statement] because (bullet point/own knowledge)


[EXPLAIN] This supports/does not support the statement because…

[LINK] This links to… because…

X3

[CONCLUSION] In conclusion I strongly agree/disagree that [insert statement] because…

Question 1: (4 marks)Describe two features of…


[EVIDENCE] This is a key feature because… {insert precise own knowledge}


[EVIDENCE] This is a key feature because… {insert precise own knowledge}

P.Ev x 2

WARFARE Question 1: Describe two features of… (4 marks)

Mark Descriptor Result

1-2 Simple statement(s)

One simple statement = 1 mark

Two simple statements = 2 marks

3-4 Statements with evidence

One statement supported by evidence = 3 marks

Two statements supported by evidence = 4 marks

WWW:

[ ] You accurately described a key

feature using a simple statement.

[ ] You accurately described two

key features in simple

statements.

[ ] You accurately described one

key feature with precise

evidence.


key features with precise

evidence.

EBI:

[ ] You need to accurately describe a

key feature using a simple statement.

[ ] You need to accurately describe

two key features in simple

statements.


one key feature with precise

evidence.


two key features with precise

evidence.

To improve my answer I must…

WARFARE Question 1: Describe two features of… (4 marks)

Mark Descriptor Result

1-2 Simple statement(s)

One simple statement = 1 mark

Two simple statements = 2 marks

3-4 Statements with evidence

One statement supported by evidence = 3 marks

Two statements supported by evidence = 4 marks

WWW:

[ ] You accurately described a key

feature using a simple statement.


key features in simple

statements.

[ ] You accurately described one

key feature with precise

evidence.


key features with precise

evidence.

EBI:

[ ] You need to accurately describe a

key feature using a simple statement.


two key features in simple statements.


one key feature with precise evidence.


two key features with precise

evidence.

To improve my answer I must…

[POINT] Source _ and Source _ are useful for (WFTQ) … because it tells me…

[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this (quote/description of sources)…[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…[RELIABILITY] Source _ is more reliable for showing this change because (N.O.P). This means it is reliable because…

[POINT] Source _ and Source _ are limited for (WFTQ) … because…

[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this (quote/description of sources)…[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…[RELIABILITY] Source _ is less reliable for showing this change because (N.O.P). This means that it is unreliable because…

Question 2a: (8 marks)How useful are Sources _ and _ for an enquiry into…Explain your answer using Source _ and _ and your own knowledge of the historical context.

P.E.O.R x 2

WARFARE Question 2a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions

Mark Description RESULT

1-2 A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance. Simple comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the sources.

3-5 Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance. Comprehension and some analysis of the sources is shown by the selection and use of material to support comments on their utility. Contextual knowledge is used directly to support comments on the usefulness of the content of the sources and/or their provenance.

6-8

Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the provenance affects the usefulness of the source content. The sources are analysed to support reasoning about their utility. Contextual knowledge is used in the process of interpreting the sources and applying criteria for judgements on their utility.

WWW:

[ ] I have used the WFTQ.

[ ] I made an accurate statement about

the usefulness of the source.

[ ] I used relevant evidence from the

source.

[ ] I used precise own knowledge

effectively to support the source.

[ ] I analysed the reliability of the source

using its provenance (N.O.P)

[ ] I have analysed both sources equally.

[ ] I have reached a strong judgement on

the usefulness of both of the sources for

the enquiry in the question.

EBI:

[ ] You used the WFTQ.

[ ] You made accurate statements about


[ ] You used relevant evidence from the

source.

[ ] You used precise own knowledge


[ ] You analysed the reliability of the

source using its provenance (N.O.P)

[ ] You analysed both sources equally.

[ ] You reached a strong judgement on



To improve I must…

WARFARE Question 2a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions

Mark Description RESULT

1-2 A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance. Simple comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the sources.

3-5 Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance. Comprehension and some analysis of the sources is shown by the selection and use of material to support comments on their utility. Contextual knowledge is used directly to support comments on the usefulness of the content of the sources and/or their provenance.

6-8

Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the provenance affects the usefulness of the source content. The sources are analysed to support reasoning about their utility. Contextual knowledge is used in the process of interpreting the sources and applying criteria for judgements on their utility.

WWW:

[ ] I have used the WFTQ.

[ ] I made an accurate statement about


[ ] I used relevant evidence from the

source.

[ ] I used precise own knowledge


[ ] I analysed the reliability of the source

using its provenance (N.O.P)

[ ] I have analysed both sources equally.

[ ] I have reached a strong judgement on



EBI:

[ ] You used the WFTQ.

[ ] You made accurate statements about


[ ] You used relevant evidence from the

source.

[ ] You used precise own knowledge


[ ] You analysed the reliability of the

source using its provenance (N.O.P)

[ ] You analysed both sources equally.

[ ] You reached a strong judgement on



To improve I must…

Question 2b: (4 marks)How could you follow up Source _ to find out about…In your answer, you must give the question you would ask and the type of source you could use.

[POINT] The detail in Source _ that I would follow up to find out more about (WFTQ)… is…

[EXPLAIN] The question I would ask to do this is…

[POINT] The type of Source I could use to do this is…

[EXPLAIN] This type of Source would help me because…

P.Ex x 2

WARFARE Question 2b: (4 marks)

How could you follow up Source _ to find out about…

Mark Description Result

1-4 • Selecting a detail in Source A that could form the basis of a follow-up enquiry = 1 mark

• Writing a question which is linked to it. (No mark for a question that is not linked to following up the Source) = 1 mark

• Identification of an appropriate source to help

your enquiry = 1 mark

• Explaining how it might help answer your

chosen follow-up question. = 1 mark

WWW:

[ ] I have stated which detail from the source I will follow up.[ ] I have written down a question I would ask to help my enquiry.[ ] I have stated what type of source I would use[ ] I have explained how my chosen source would help my enquiry

EBI:

[ ] I stated which detail from the source I will follow up.[ ] I wrote down a question I would ask to help my enquiry.[ ] I stated what type of source I would use[ ] I explained how my chosen source would help my enquiry

To improve I must….

WARFARE Question 2b: (4 marks)

How could you follow up Source _ to find out about…


1-4 • Selecting a detail in Source A that could form the basis of a follow-up enquiry = 1 mark

• Writing a question which is linked to it. (No mark for a question that is not linked to following up the Source) = 1 mark

• Identification of an appropriate source to help

your enquiry = 1 mark

• Explaining how it might help answer your

chosen follow-up question. = 1 mark

WWW:

[ ] I have stated which detail from the source I will follow up.[ ] I have written down a question I would ask to help my enquiry.[ ] I have stated what type of source I would use[ ] I have explained how my chosen source would help my enquiry

EBI:

[ ] I stated which detail from the source I will follow up.[ ] I wrote down a question I would ask to help my enquiry.[ ] I stated what type of source I would use[ ] I explained how my chosen source would help my enquiry


Question 3: (4 marks)Explain one way in which…

[POINT] One way in which… (WFTQ) was different/similar is…


[EXPLAIN] This shows that … has changed/is similar because…

P.Ev.Ex x 1

WARFARE Question 3: (4 marks)

Explain one way in which…


1-2 Simple or generalised comment is offered about a difference/similarityGeneralised information about the topic is included.

3-4 Features of the period are analysed to explain a difference/similarity.Specific information about the topic is added to support the comparison.

WWW:

[ ] I have used the WFTQ

[ ] I have written an accurate

statement about a

difference/similarity.


description of a


[ ] I accurately explained a

difference/similarity

[ ] I used precise historical

knowledge as evidence to support

my explanation

EBI:

[ ] You used the WFTQ

[ ] You need to write an accurate

statement about a



description of a difference/similarity.

[ ] You accurately explained a


[ ] You used precise historical


your explanation


WARFARE Question 3: (4 marks)

Explain one way in which…


1-2 Simple or generalised comment is offered about a difference/similarityGeneralised information about the topic is included.

3-4 Features of the period are analysed to explain a difference/similarity.Specific information about the topic is added to support the comparison.

WWW:



statement about a



description of a


[ ] I accurately explained a


[ ] I used precise historical


my explanation

EBI:



statement about a



description of a


[ ] You accurately explained a


[ ] You used precise historical


your explanation


Question 4: (12 marks)Explain why…You may use the following in your answer: (2 bullet points)

[POINT] One reason why (WFTQ)… is…



[POINT] Another reason why (WFTQ) … is…



[POINT] A final reason why (WFTQ) … is…



P.E.E.L x 3

WARFARE Question 4: (12 marks) Explain why…

Marks Description Result

1-3 A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development andorganisation. No accurate content receives zero marks.

4-6

Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

7-9

An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

10-12

An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied. No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

WWW:


[ ] I have written accurate statements

directed at the question.

[ ] I have used precise factual detail for my

evidence.

[ ] I have accurately explained one of the

bullet points using precise evidence.

[ ] I have accurately explained both of the


[ ] I have written a relevant third

paragraph showing my own wider

knowledge and understanding.

[ ] I have written in the past tense.

[ ] My answer is coherent and organised.

EBI:


[ ] You wrote accurate statements directed

at the question.

[ ] You used precise factual detail for your

evidence.

[ ] You accurately explained one of the


[ ] You accurately explained both of the


[ ] You need a relevant third paragraph

showing my own wider knowledge and

understanding.

[ ] You wrote in the past tense.

[ ] Your answer needs to be coherent and

organised.


WARFARE Question 4: (12 marks) Explain why…

Marks Description Result

1-3 A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development andorganisation. No accurate content receives zero marks.

4-6

Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

7-9

An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

10-12

An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied. No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

WWW:


[ ] I have written accurate statements

directed at the question.

[ ] I have used precise factual detail for my

evidence.

[ ] I have accurately explained one of the


[ ] I have accurately explained both of the


[ ] I have written a relevant third

paragraph showing my own wider

knowledge and understanding.



EBI:


[ ] You wrote accurate statements directed

at the question.

[ ] You used precise factual detail for your

evidence.

[ ] You accurately explained one of the


[ ] You accurately explained both of the




understanding.



organised.


Question 5/6: (16 marks + 4 SPAG)“INSERT STATEMENT” How far do you agree? Explain your

answer (2 bullet points)

[POINT] I agree/disagree that [insert statement] because (bullet point/own knowledge)


[EXPLAIN] This supports/does not support the statement because…

[LINK] This links to… because…

X3

[CONCLUSION] In conclusion I strongly agree/disagree that [insert statement] because…

WARFARE Question 4/5: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree?


1-4

A simple or generalised answer, lacking development and organisation. Limited knowledge of the topic is shown. The overall judgement is missing. No accurate content receives zero marks

5-8

A simple explanation is given showing limited analysis and with implicit links to the conceptual focus of the question. It shows some development and organisation of material but reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included, showing some knowledge and understanding of the period. Weak overall judgement is given. Maximum 7 marks for answers that do not include a third point

9-12

An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the conceptual focus of the question. It shows a line of reasoning that is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included, showing good knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied. The overall judgement is given with some justification. Maximum 10 marks for answers that do not include a third point

13-16

An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, reasoning is coherent, sustained and structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely selected to address the question directly, showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the period studied. Overall judgement is clear and justified. No access to L4 for answers that do not include a third point

SPAG 1-2 SPAG is poor

3-4 SPAG is good

WWW:

[ ] I have used the WFTQ in my point.

[ ] I have written accurate statements directed

at the question.

[ ] I have accurately explained one/both of the


[ ] I have accurately analysed one/both of the


[ ] I have written a relevant third paragraph


understanding.

[ ] My answer is directed at the conceptional

focus of the question throughout my answer.

[ ] I have written a strong overall judgement

explaining how far I agree with the statement.



EBI:

[ ] You used the WFTQ in your point.

[ ] You wrote accurate statements directed at

the question.

[ ] You accurately explained one/both of the


[ ] You accurately analysed one/both of the




understanding.

[ ] Your answer was directed at the

conceptional focus of the question throughout.

[ ] You wrote a strong overall judgement




organised.


WARFARE Question 4/5: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree?


1-4

A simple or generalised answer, lacking development and organisation. Limited knowledge of the topic is shown. The overall judgement is missing. No accurate content receives zero marks

5-8

A simple explanation is given showing limited analysis and with implicit links to the conceptual focus of the question. It shows some development and organisation of material but reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included, showing some knowledge and understanding of the period. Weak overall judgement is given. Maximum 7 marks for answers that do not include a third point

9-12

An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the conceptual focus of the question. It shows a line of reasoning that is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included, showing good knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied. The overall judgement is given with some justification. Maximum 10 marks for answers that do not include a third point

13-16

An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, reasoning is coherent, sustained and structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely selected to address the question directly, showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the period studied. Overall judgement is clear and justified. No access to L4 for answers that do not include a third point

SPAG 1-2 SPAG is poor

3-4 SPAG is good

WWW:

[ ] I have used the WFTQ in my point.

[ ] I have written accurate statements directed

at the question.

[ ] I have accurately explained one/both of the


[ ] I have accurately analysed one/both of the


[ ] I have written a relevant third paragraph


understanding.

[ ] My answer is directed at the conceptional

focus of the question throughout my answer.

[ ] I have written a strong overall judgement




EBI:

[ ] You used the WFTQ in your point.

[ ] You wrote accurate statements directed at

the question.

[ ] You accurately explained one/both of the


[ ] You accurately analysed one/both of the




understanding.

[ ] Your answer was directed at the

conceptional focus of the question throughout.

[ ] You wrote a strong overall judgement




organised.


new paper 1: warfare and british society c1250-present and london … · 2018. 1. 23. · paper 1:...

Documents