new york metropolitan region - homepage | pace...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Dr. Cynthia RosenzweigNASA GISS/Columbia University
Pace University Law SchoolSeptember 12, 2014
Climate Impacts and Adaptation in the
New York Metropolitan Region
Climate Change and New York StateA Long History of Action
2
• New York State and New York City both have long history of action responding to climate change – Responding to Climate Change in
New York State (ClimAID) – New York City Panel on Climate
Change
• Recent extreme weather events (including Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy) illustrate climate vulnerabilities across the state and the need for adaptation planning
NOAA and NASA, 2011
Climate Change in the New York City Metro Area
Spencer Platt Getty Images
3
YEAR REPORT TITLE ORGANIZATION/PUBLIISHER
2014 Updated Climate Projections for New York State New York State Energy Research & Development Authority
2013/14 New York City Panel on Climate Change Columbia University and CUNY
2011 New York State ClimAID Adaptation Assessment New York State Energy Research & Development Authority
2010 New York City Panel on Climate Change Columbia University and CUNY
2010 Rising Waters: Helping Hudson River Communities Adapt to Climate Change
The Nature Conservancy
2008 New York City’s Vulnerability to Coastal Flooding: Storm Surge Modeling of Past Cyclones
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
2008 Climate Change Program Assessment and Action Plan New York City Department of Environmental Protection
2007 Confronting Climate Change in the U.S. Northeast: Science, Impacts and Solutions
Union of Concerned Scientists
2007 August 8, 2007 Storm Report Metropolitan Transit Authority
2001 Climate Change and a Global City: Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change
U.S. National Assessment & Columbia Earth Institute
1999 Hot Nights in the City: Global Warming, Sea‐Level Rise and the New York Metropolitan Region
Environmental Defense Fund
1996 The Baked Apple? Metropolitan New York in the Greenhouse New York Academy of Sciences
New York State Climate Regions
4ClimAID, 2011
Westchester sits at the boundary of three climate Regions (2, 4, and 5). Most climate data (observed and future) shown here are for Region 4. In general projected mean changes are similar throughout these 3 regions.
What does the local climate record tell us?
5
Source: NOAA; NASA; Columbia CCSR, 2014
New York City Metropolitan RegionClimate Hazards
July 2010 Heat Waves
August 2007 Rainfall
Hurricane SandySnowfall
6
7
TemperatureMean annual temperature in New York City has increased 4.4°F from 1900 to 2011.
PrecipitationMean annual precipitation has increased 7.7 inches from 1900 to 2011 (a change of 1.4 percent per decade). Year‐to‐year precipitation variability was greater from 1956 to 2011 than from 1900 to 1955.
Sea LevelSea level in New York City (at the Battery) has risen 1.1 feet since 1900.
* All trends significant at the 99% levelNPCC2 CRI, 2013
Extreme Events75% increase in heaviest rain events in Northeastin last 50 yrs
Increase in strength of hurricanes and in number of the most intense hurricanes in North Atlantic since early 1980s
Observed Climate Trends
Observed U.S. Trends
USGCRP 2009
Rising Temperatures
Longer Growing Season
Record highs exceed record lows
8
What is projected for the New York City metropolitan area?
9
Uncertainty and Risk Management
10NPCC, 2013; CCSR, 2013
Projections are presented in a way that facilitates risk-based decision-making
• Accomplished by:– Using ranges of model‐based
outcomes and likelihoods based on scientific literature
– Presenting outcomes based on climate model results and different future greenhouse gas emissions
• Note that model‐based outcomes do not encompass the full range of possible futures
¹ Presented relative to the 1971 - 2000 base period. Based on 35 global climate models and 2 representative concentrations pathways. The 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of the distribution are presented.
Climate Projection MethodsTemperature and Precipitation
• Variables– Mean annual changes– Changes in extreme events
• Quantitative projections based on global climate model simulations
• Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5)– 35 global climate models (GCMs) – 2 representative concentration pathways
(RCP4.5, RCP8.5)– Timeslices: 2020s, 2050s, 2080s, 2100– 1 ensemble member per GCM– Single gridbox downscaling (Horton et al.,
2011)
11NPCC; 2013 CCSR, 2013
RCP CO2 Concentrations
Mean Annual ChangesTemperature and Precipitation
12NYSERDA, 2014
Air temperatureBaseline (1971‐2000) 54.6°F
Low‐estimate(10th percentile)
Middle range(25th to 75th percentile)
High‐estimate(90th percentile)
2020s + 1.5°F + 2.0°F to 2.9°F + 3.2°F
2050s + 3.1°F + 4.1°F to 5.7°F + 6.6°F
2080s + 3.8°F + 5.3°F to 8.8°F + 10.3°F
2100 + 4.2°F + 5.8°F to 10.4°F + 12.1°F
PrecipitationBaseline (1971‐2000) 49.7 inches
Low‐estimate(10th percentile)
Middle range(25th to 75th percentile)
High‐estimate(90th percentile)
2020s ‐ 1 percent + 1 to + 8 percent + 10 percent
2050s + 1 percent + 4 to + 11 percent + 13 percent
2080s + 2 percent + 5 to + 13 percent + 19 percent
2100 ‐ 6 percent ‐ 1 to + 19 percent + 25 percent Based on 35 GCMs and two Representative Concentration Pathways. Baseline data are from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) and are for New York City (Central Park). Shown are the low‐estimate (10th percentile), middle range (25th percentile to 75th percentile), and high‐estimate (90th percentile) 30‐year mean values from model‐based outcomes.
Region 4 – New York City and Long Island*
Extreme EventsTemperature
13NYSERDA, 2014
Based on 35 GCMs and two Representative Concentration Pathways. Baseline data are from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) and are for New York City (Central Park). Shown are the low‐estimate (10th percentile), middle range (25th percentile to 75th percentile), and high‐estimate (90th percentile) 30‐year mean values from model‐based outcomes.
Number of days/year with minimum temperature at or below 32°F71 days/year
Low‐estimate(10th percentile)
Middle range(25th to 75th percentile)
High‐estimate(90th percentile)
2020s 50 52 to 58 60
2050s 37 42 to 48 52
2080s 25 30 to 42 49
Number of days/year with maximum temperature at or above 90°F (1971‐2000) 18 days/year
Low‐estimate(10th percentile)
Middle range(25th to 75th percentile)
High‐estimate(90th percentile)
2020s 24 26 to 31 33
2050s 32 39 to 52 57
2080s 38 44 to 76 87
Region 4 – New York City and Long Island*
Sea Level Rise Methods
14
• Developed single range – Included future changes in polar ice sheets
• Updated model‐based components with CMIP5– 24 Global Climate Models– 2 Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5)
• Revised meltwater and land‐subsidence terms
• Added additional components– Land water storage– Gravitational, isostatic, rotational (‘fingerprint’) term
NPCC; 2013 CCSR, 2013
Sea Level Rise Projections
15NYSERDA, 2014; CCSR, 2013
Sea level rise¹Baseline
(2000‐2004) 0 inches
Low‐estimate(10th percentile)
Middle range(25th to 75thpercentile)
High‐estimate(90th percentile)
2020s 1 inch 3 to 7 inches 9 inches
2050s 5 inches 9 to 19 inches 27 inches
2080s 10 inches 14 to 36 inches 54 inches
2100 11 inches 18 to 46 inches 71 inches
¹ Based on 24 GCMs and 2 Representative Concentration Pathways.
Region 5 – East Hudson and Mohawk River Valleys (Troy Dam)
How is the New York City metropolitan region responding to
climate change?
16
17
Flexible Adaptation Pathways
Climate change adaptation as a risk management issue
Flexible Adaptation Pathways as the response
Source: NPCC, 2010
18
1. Identify current and future climate hazards
2. Conduct inventory of infrastructure and assets and begin to identify vulnerabilities
3. Characterize risk
4. Develop initial list of strategies
5. Identify opportunities for coordination
6. Prioritize strategies
7. Prepare and implement Resilience Plans
8. Monitor and reassess
NPCC, 2010
Steps of Assessment and Implementation
19
New York City Adaptation Process
Source: NPCC, 2010
Stakeholder Task ForceCCATF
City‐wide Sustainability Office OLTPS
Expert PanelNPCC
CWW
P
T
E
Mayor
City Agencies
‐ Regional Authorities
‐ Private Stakeholders
Integration across
Sector‐specific Working Groups ‐ Energy (E) ‐ Transportation (T)
‐ Policy (P) ‐ Water & Waste (WW)
‐ Communications (C)
University scholars and private sector experts
‐ Social, biological, and physical scientists
‐ Legal and insurance experts
‐ Risk management professionals
Leadership
Coordination
Implementation
Climate Science
How can we advance resilience in the New York City metropolitan
region?
• Leadership– Set explicit goals by high‐level metropolitan region leaders in regard to
development of climate resilience
• Coordination – Create liaison office that organizes the interactions between the relevant
groups throughout the metropolitan region
• Climate Information– Use latest scientific data and methods available for the metropolitan region.
• Civil Society – Identify community needs and wants across the entire metropolitan region.
• Implementation – Create partnerships among municipal, state, national, and international
bodies that can provide financing for implementation of adaptation strategies.
Best Practices for Metropolitan Regions
21UCCRN, 2014
Key Players in Metropolitan Resilience
22
Key Player Roles and Responsibilities
Governments
Roles: Lead City, Metropolitan Region Municipal, State, and National Governments
Responsibilities: Establishing councils, commissions, and task forces; coordinating key groups; conducting local risk assessments; setting policies and funding large‐scale investments and projects
Citizen Groups
Roles: Grass‐roots efforts in individual metropolitan regions; local chapters of international organizations; local non‐profit groups engaged in community efforts
Responsibilities: Information gathering for metropolitan planners and decision‐makers; information dissemination to public; assessing social vulnerabilities
Infrastructure ManagersRoles: Managing critical metropolitan region infrastructure
Responsibilities: Developing and implementing resilience planning to protect against climate events
Private Sector
Roles: Insurance companies; utility providers; other businesses
Responsibilities: Designing, planning, and executing implementation of resilience measures and adaptation strategies; ensuring compliance with new regulations
Knowledge Providers
Roles: Academics from universities, government agencies, and private sector research groups
Responsibilities: Co‐generating climate risk information with decision‐makers; tailoring information to the needs of individual metropolitan regions; communicating climate risk information and uncertainties to decision‐makers and the public
UCCRN, 2014
Approaches to Resilience Action
23
Policy, social, engineering, and ecosystems interact to respond to changing climate and coastal hazards. Overlapping areas illustrate opportunities for adaptation and resilience strategies that combine components of each domain.
UCCRN, 2014
References and Links• Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast (www.ccrun.org)• NYSERDA ClimAID (www.nyserda.ny.gov/climaid) • New York City Panel on Climate Change Report (www.nyas.org) • Urban Climate Change Research Network (www.uccrn.org)
NPCC
24