nexos desarrollo - cultivos ilícitos y tres propuestas para el siguiente siglo
TRANSCRIPT
Nexos desarrollo - cultivos ilícitos y tres propuestas para el próximo siguiente siglo
Liliana M. Dávalos
Banco de la República17 y 18 Julio 2017
!
What we do in the lab The Dávalos Lab
A double mission
Biological diversityEvolution Extinctionincrease decrease
Come to ColEvol! 17 August 2017
Biological diversityEvolution Extinctionincrease decrease
Focus on deforestation A recent headline
Biological diversityEvolution Habitat lossincrease decrease
Coca = deforestation Dávalos et al. 2011 Env. Sci. & Tech.
Fight coca, fight deforestation… Dávalos et al. 2011 Env. Sci. & Tech.
Analyzing social factorsSánchez Cuervo & Aide 2013 Ecosystems Armenteras et al. 2013 Reg. Environ. Change Dávalos et al. 2011 Env. Sci. & Tech.
The chicken or the egg Dávalos 2016 Int. J. Drug Policy
Answers require a change in perspective The egg came first!
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
Changing my own perspective Dávalos et al. 2016 Bioscience
A pattern emerges
• Sources are often dissertations
• Each focuses primarily on one area
• Most sources written by students in German universities
• At first, I had no access…
So I waited Wesche 1968 U. of Florida
Similarities
• Schuurman 1978 Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Ge.
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
More similarities
• Brücher 1977 Geogr. Z.
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
A remarkable spatial pattern Dávalos et al. 2016 Bioscience
A spatial relationship Dávalos et al. 2016 Bioscience
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
The Amazonian frontier Denevan 1966 Geogr. Rev.
Charter and declaration of Punta del Este
INCORA 1974 IICAPresidents of America 1967 Punta del Este Declaration
This is the past
Etter et al. 2006 J. Environ. Manage.
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Colombia
Ecuador
Coca cultivation
Government-sponsored
before 1979
1990/1992
Projects
Coca cultivation
High
Low
2014
Percent forestHigh
Low
Probability of coca
a b c
This is the present: Projects & roads ~ carbon emissions Global Forest Watch Climate 2017
The present No longer remote
This is the future (in part) Nepstad et al. 2008 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
This is the future (in part) Ray et al. 2015 Mongabay
What happens when the frontier closes? 1869
Frontier closes, forest vanishes Stanton 2014 Biol. Cons.
The forest has too much value!
• To the people who live there now• Not everyone wants the
roads• Some want roads but not
destruction• Aesthetic
• This should not be underestimated
• In biodiversity of today and future use
• As carbon storage
One reason why we need the forest MIDAS Project, Swansea University
First proposal: protect NOW
• We must protect the forests• NOW• The forest frontier will
close• But need for storage is
imminent• Price of carbon storage will rise
• How?• Ley 2• Protected areas• Collective titles
Ley 2 1959
• Covers virtually all forests of the country
• Subtractions include• Colonization projects • Land titling programs
(spontaneous colonization)
Armenteras et al. 2017 Ecol. Appl.
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
3035404550
ForestN
P
1500
2000
2500
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Pasture
150200250300350400
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
0.51.01.52.02.5
Coca
500
550
600
650
700 ●●
●
●●
●
●
●
3035404550
PA
(ha)
150
200
250
300
350
●●
●●
●
● ●
●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
2468101214
●
●
●
●●●
●●
0.51.01.52.02.5
90
100
110
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
3035404550PLAND
EN
N (m
)
95100105110115120
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40PLAND
300
400
500
600
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.51.01.52.02.5PLAND
Figure 2
BA
G
C
E FD
H I
253035404550
2001 2004 2007 201025
30
35
40
2001 2004 2007 2010
1
2
3
2001 2004 2007 2010
PLA
ND
K L M
An example from Guaviare Dávalos et al. 2014 Biol. Cons.
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
3035404550
Forest
NP
1500
2000
2500
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Pasture
150200250300350400
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
0.51.01.52.02.5
Coca
500
550
600
650
700 ●●
●
●●
●
●
●
3035404550
PA
(ha)
150
200
250
300
350
●●
●●
●
● ●
●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
2468101214
●
●
●
●●●
●●
0.51.01.52.02.5
90
100
110
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
3035404550PLAND
EN
N (m
)
95100105110115120
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
28 30 32 34 36 38 40PLAND
300
400
500
600
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.51.01.52.02.5PLAND
Figure 2
BA
G
C
E FD
H I
253035404550
2001 2004 2007 201025
30
35
40
2001 2004 2007 2010
1
2
3
2001 2004 2007 2010
PLA
ND
K L M
Protected areas Dávalos et al. 2011 Env. Sci. & Tech. Armenteras et al. 2006 Ecol. Indic. Sánchez-Cuervo & Aide 2013 Ecosphere
Collective titlingWRI 2016 Climate benefits, tenure costs
Key points, Protect NOW
• Ley 2 ✘• Protected areas
(parks) ✔• Collective titling ✔
Dávalos et al. 2014 Biol. Cons.
Time to pay the bills But how?
Second proposal: a market for deforestation
• Goals are to reduce deforestation• But deforestation rates
have risen instead• National commitment ≠ local
commitment• Conditions fluid
• Shifts in policy• Demobilization
A man holding a Colombian flag walks in Meta, Colombia. ‘The Farc would limit logging to two hectares a year in the municipality,’ says the mayor of a town in the province.
Brodzinsky 2017 The Guardian
Álvarez 2001 Environmentalist
Cap and trade EPA 2016 Our nation’s air
Can Colombia do it? Fontecha 2016 Mongabay
• Environmental markets already exist (water)• Policies in place but not widely known
Key points, Market for deforestation
• Development and demobilization create access• Access generates
deforestation• Market can set targets for
local actors• Municipalities• Corporaciones
Regionales• Private sector
• And trade can help meet national targets
The inequality of inequality Piketty 2013 Capital in the
Twenty-first Century
A modest inequality
• In long run• rforest > rproperty
• But right now• rforest < rproperty
• Therefore forest loss
Third proposal: Raise the return on forest
• Market in deforestation can be part of this• Conserve and get dividend
from another actor• But need other sources of
return that don’t require clearing
• Therefore• All road extensions need local forest reserves
• Develop parts of local forests for tourism
Example: Mount Rushmore Far from everything and
completely artificial
I.e., parks don’t have to be just for the intrepid E.g., Los Nevados
Key points, Raise the return on forest
• More people visiting can mean more protection
• More people employed can mean more protection
• More people benefitting means more protection
Thanks!