nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

17
1 Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Primary Health Care 25.8.2011 Pia Hakamäki (Researcher, THL) & Timo Ståhl (Development Manager, PhD, Adjunct professor, THL)

Upload: nfhk2011

Post on 16-May-2015

151 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Primary Health Care. Pia Hakamäki (Researcher, THL) & Timo Ståhl (Development Manager, PhD, Adjunct professor, THL)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

1

Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Primary Health Care

25.8.2011

Pia Hakamäki (Researcher, THL) &

Timo Ståhl (Development Manager, PhD, Adjunct professor, THL)

Page 2: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Contents

• Issue

• Project description

– Objectives and focus

– Definition of health promotion work

– Different steps of economic assessment

• Results

– Calculating the share and costs of health promotion

• Conclusions and summary

2TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 3: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Issue

1. Health promotion (HP) belongs to the work of every administrative field

2. Lack of knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of HP activities carried out as normal procedures of the everyday work of organisations

3. Information is needed in each sector in order to support planning and decision-making in municipalities¹

3TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 4: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Project description

• Started in 2008 (–2012)

• Working group co-ordinated by THL

• Five municipalities:

– Salo (population 55 235)

– Oulu (141 671)

– Kauniainen (8 689)

– Muurame (9 256) and

– Tampere (213 217)

• In co-operation with municipal experts from various administrative sectors, the Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities

4TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 5: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

5

Project objectives 2008-2012

• To outline key health promotion functions in different municipal administrative sectors

• To calculate the resources spent on health promotion, and to determine outputs and effects (later also cost-effectiveness)

• To provide municipalities with a model for the economic assessment of health promotion

• To produce comparable data

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 6: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

6

Project focuses

• Health promotion in the municipal service system

• Services purchased are also included, but separate interventions are not

• Limited to children, young people and families with children

• ²Administrative sectors:

1. ³primary health care, social services, education and general administration

2. culture and leisure department, sports and youth administration, environmental and technical administration

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 7: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

HP activities in three sectors

7TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki

DaycarePromoting

healthy growth

and development

School welfare

services

Rehabilitation

services

Maternal and

child health

clinics

Support for the

long-term

unemployed

Integration

work

Substance

abuse prevention

and mental

health work

Home-help

services

Family

mediation

Child guidance

and family

counselling

School

health careGeneral

practice

Oral

health care

Other public

health core

functions

School

environment

Community

actions

School welfare

activity

Special

educational

supportPreventive

child

welfare

work

Health

promotion

25.08.2011

Page 8: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

25.08.2011 8

1. Determination of health promotion work and limitations

2. Calculating the proportion of health promotion work

3. Cost calculation

4. Outputs of health promotion work

5. Effects of health promotion work

6. Utilisation of comparable data to

support decision-making

Different steps of economic assessment of health promotion (HP) work

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki

Page 9: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

9

Calculating the proportion of health promotion work

25.08.2011 TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki

Page 10: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki 10

• Use of existing information systems

1. Client visits and routine classification

– Preventive/medical treatment visits, percentage

2. Number of visits

3. Procedures

4. Group activities

Extra: Appointment books

– Total hours spent on health promotion

Primary health care

25.08.2011

Page 11: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Results of the proportion of health promotion work • Maternal and child health clinics 95–98 %

• School health care

– public health nurses 62–76%

– school doctors 91–92 %

• Oral health care

– orthodontic therapists 41–45 %

– dentists and dental nurses 2–3 %

• Rehabilitation services 7–11 %

11TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 12: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Calculating costs

• Calculation model

→ takes into account personnel costs but also other costs

→ consistent with all adminstrative sectors

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki 1225.08.2011

Page 13: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Results of the costs of health promotion work, 2008/2009

According to preliminary results of two municipalities:

• 11 and 17 % of the primary health care costs

• 3 and 4 % of the total health care costs

• The cost of the health promotion work was EUR 243 and 331 per 0–16-year-old child per year.

13TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 14: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

TEVA – EconomicaAssessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki 14

Conclusions

• Defining health promotion work is a challenging but possible

• Very difficult to get comparable data on costs

→ documentation and transparency of assessment

→ calculation is focused on personal costs

• The municipal information systems already hold large amounts of data; the goal is to describe how to utilise this data

• Determining comparable outputs and effects!

25.08.2011

Page 15: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

• The big challenge …

… does the organisation provide incentives (fiscal) that encourage cross-system working?

15TEVA – EconomicaAssessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki25.08.2011

Page 16: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

Sources

• ¹Kiiskinen, Vehko, Matikainen, Natunen & Aromaa (2008). Terveyden edistämisen mahdollisuudet. Vaikuttavuus ja kustannusvaikuttavuus. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö Julkaisuja 2008:1.

• ²Perttilä, Hakamäki, Hujanen & Ståhl. (2009). Terveyden edistämisen taloudellinen arviointi kunnissa. THL. Avauksia 8/2009. Available in electronic format:

www.thl.fi/thl-client/pdfs/9c078431-6be6-4c41-ab57-16a14f74432c

• ³Hakamäki, Perttilä, Hujanen & Ståhl. 2011. Terveyden edistämisen taloudellinen arviointi kunnissa. THL. Raportti 11/2011

http://www.thl.fi/thl-client/pdfs/f920b92c-f4e3-4b60-b3e4-69763e1acb30

• Linna 2009. Ehkäisevän terveydenhuollon osuus perusterveydenhuollon avotoiminnan potilasepisodeista ja kokonaisvoimavarojen käytöstä. Terveystaloustiede. THL. Avauksia 4/2009.

TEVA – Economic Assessment of Health Promotion in Finnish Municipalities/Pia Hakamäki 1625.08.2011

Page 17: Nfhk2011 pia hakamaki_parallel201

17

Thank you!

Pia Hakamäki

e.mail: [email protected]

GSM: + 358 40 5188685

Mika Vuori

e.mail: [email protected]

Sanna Kilpeläinen