ngi policy workshop discussion on the questionnaire responses

7
EGEE-II INFSO-RI- 031688 Enabling Grids for E-sciencE www.eu-egee.org EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses Fotis Karayannis GRNET EGEE'06 Conference 26 September 2006, Geneva, Switzerland

Upload: elton-vincent

Post on 31-Dec-2015

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses. Fotis Karayannis GRNET EGEE'06 Conference 26 September 2006, Geneva, Switzerland. Observations and Issues. General Has it reached the right recipient? Some remarked on the selection procedure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

www.eu-egee.org

EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks

NGI Policy WorkshopDiscussion on the Questionnaire responses

Fotis Karayannis

GRNET

EGEE'06 Conference

26 September 2006,

Geneva, Switzerland

Page 2: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 2

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues

• General– Has it reached the right recipient?

Some remarked on the selection procedure

– Many countries did answer the questionnaire!– Got answers for both the mandatory and optional parts

Page 3: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 3

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues (II)

• NGI related– Loose definition of NGI?

22 out of 26 (~ 85%) declared having an NGI

– Loose definition of Government recognition? 17 out of 22 (77%) declared Government support

• 50% of NGIs are funded national projects (obviously with Governmental support…)

• While only 1 separate legal entity..

– Small number of applications supported by each NGI– Large variety of application areas

Page 4: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 4

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues (III)

• EGI related– EGI most important functions:

Representation at international level (13+8) Coordination of infrastructure operations (12+9) M/w testing and validation (10+11)

– Then…: Representation of European Grid efforts on standards bodies

(10+8) Coordination of dissemination and training efforts (8+10)

– Less important.. Managed resource centres that can provide initial resources for new

user communities (6+9) Coordination of user and application support (6+8)

• Also 6 “Should not be done by EGI”

Page 5: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 5

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues (IV)

• Other EGI functions proposed:– Relationship with other major e-Infrastructures stakeholders

(GEANT/DANTE/NRENs and HPC centres)– Policy issues - Resource sharing mechanisms– Interoperability work including m/w

Page 6: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 6

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues (V)

• Who should be the EGI stakeholders?– NGIs only?– Others?– How about Industry?

• Who should be the funding agencies?– National funding agencies– EC– Others (e.g. NRENs)?– How about Industry?

Page 7: NGI Policy Workshop Discussion on the Questionnaire responses

EGEE-II NA5 NGI Policy Workshop – CICG, 2006-09-26 7

Enabling Grids for E-sciencE

EGEE-II INFSO-RI-031688

Observations and Issues (VI)

• All besides one NGI are prepared to join EGI

• NGI (initially) combined with other bodies– 6 NRENs (directly or indirectly)– 3 Supercomputing centres?

• No sustainable funding seems to be the case for the majority of the NGIs