nicaragua v. us
DESCRIPTION
DigestTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Nicaragua v. US](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072113/577c85ed1a28abe054bf15fb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NICARAGUA VS UNITED STATES
FACTS:
In July 1979 the Government of President Somoza collapsed
following an armed opposition led by the Frente Sandinista de
Liberacion Nacional (FSLN). The new government – installed by
FSLN – began to encounter armed opposition from supporters of
the former Somoza Government and ex-members of the National
Guard. The US – initially supportive of the new government –
changed its attitude when, according to the US, it found that
Nicaragua was providing logistical support and weapons to guerrillas
in El Salvador. In April 1981 it terminated US aid to Nicaragua and
in September 1981, according to Nicaragua, the US “decided to plan
and undertake activities directed against Nicaragua”.
Initial support to these groups fighting against the
Nicaraguan Government (called “contras”) was covert. Later, the US
officially acknowledged its support.
Nicaragua alleged that the US is effectively in control of
the contras who violated international humanitarian laws.
ISSUE:
WON the relationship of the contras to the United States
Government was such that it can be equated as an organ of the US,
or as acting on its behalf.
HELD: No. The Court considers that the evidence available to it is
insufficient to demonstrate the total the total dependence of the
contras on the US aid. A partial dependency, the exact extent of
which the Court cannot establish, may be inferred from the fact that
the leaders were selected by the US, and from other factors such as
the organization, training and equipping the force, planning and
operations, the choosing of the targets and the operational support
provided. There is no clear evidence that the US actually exercised
such a degree of control as to justify treating the contras acting on its
behalf.