nirs research on retirement security
DESCRIPTION
NIRS Research on Retirement Security. NAGDCA Industry Roundtable Meeting April 24, 2014. Diane Oakley Executive Director. What Do Americans Think About Retirement? Anxious. How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?. 2. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NIRS Research on Retirement Security
NAGDCA Industry Roundtable MeetingApril 24, 2014
Diane Oakley Executive Director
![Page 2: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What Do Americans Think About Retirement? Anxious
How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?
2Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013
![Page 3: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Disappearance of Pensions an Impediment to “American Dream”
To what extent do you agree/disagree that the disappearance of pensions has made it harder for workers to achieve the
“American Dream?”
3
![Page 4: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
It’s Only Getting Harder to Prepare for Retirement
Do you feel that – compared to today – it will be easier or harder for Americans to prepare for retirement in the future, or will there be no
difference?
4Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013
![Page 5: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ON THE RIGHT TRACK?State Pension Reforms in the
Aftermath of the Financial Crisis
5
![Page 6: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Why Private Employers Froze DB Pensions and Shifted to 401(k)s
• Onerous funding regulations on private pensions and FASB accounting rules caused funding volatility
• Changes in technology and industrial makeup of economy
• Shift from internal labor markets to flexible labor markets, insecure employment
• Corporate objective to maximize shareholder value
![Page 7: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Many Private Sector Employers Remain Committed to DB Plans
• “Many employers remain committed to providing these plans as an important part of their compensation package.” (U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Retirement Benefits in the 21st Century)
• Three-fourths of active DB pensions report “DB plan aligns with our total rewards philosophy” (AonHewitt: “Global Pension Risk Survey 2011: US Survey Findings,” )
![Page 8: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ON THE RIGHT TRACK?Public Sector Difference• Commitment to stable employment relations and
internal labor markets.
• Greater ability to smooth out the effects of business cycles on funding requirements.
• Public interest mission: DB pensions help provide high quality public services in a cost effective manner, while also providing retirement security.
• Public employers have more in common with the largest private employers, who have maintained DBs.
![Page 9: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Public Pension Reforms After 2008 Financial Crisis
• Vast majority have modified their existing pension plans. Most common:– increased Employee contributions; – reduced DB benefits for new hires, including
higher retirement age– Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA)
reductions for retirees and existing workers.
![Page 10: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Aggressive Reforms In Virtually All States to Ensure Sustainability of Public Pensions
9
16
29
39
0 10 20 30 40 50
Employer contribution increase (statutory)
Reduced COLA for current members
Employee contribution increase
Reduced benefits for new hires
Number of States
Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.
Types of Changes Enacted
10
![Page 11: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Employee and
Employer
Contributions,
1982 to 2009
Public Pensions Typically Are Shared Funding Responsibility
Source: U.S. Census Bureau11
![Page 12: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
After 2008 Financial Crisis: 48 States Make Pension Reforms
• No state has shifted to a DC-only plan since 2005.
• Four new mandatory hybrid arrangements with a DC component, most for new hires only.
• Three Cash Balance Plan for new hires • Only one state, Rhode Island, enacted a
“Hard Freeze” for current employees.
![Page 13: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Most States Stay with DB; Some Switch to Hybrid
Types of Changes to New Hire Benefits
Four states enacted optional DC-only benefits for new hires.
Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.
3
4
32
0 10 20 30 40
Mandatory CB (DB closed)
DB + DC hybrid
Adjust existing DB plan
Number of States
![Page 14: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Higher Age and Service Requirements for New Members 2009–2012
14
4
4
Total: 32 States PR
![Page 15: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Increases in Employee Contributions 2009–2012
15
Future Members Only (7 states)
At Least Some Current Members (23 states)PR
![Page 16: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
People already retired and active employees (11 states)
Future hires only (7 states)
At least some active employees (6 states)Total: 24 States
Reductions in Post-Retirement Benefit Increases 2009–2012
PR
![Page 17: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2013 Public Pension Reforms Tennessee Hybrid
• Apply: State employees, teachers and Higher Ed hired after July1, 2014
• Reduced DB: new 1% multiplier ( 1.575%) and NRA 65 or rule of 90.
• Contributions:
– Employee: 5% for DB and 2% for DC
– Employer: 4% for DB and 4% for DC.
![Page 18: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2013 Public Pension Reforms Kentucky Cash Balance Plan
• Apply: State employees and County employees hired after July1, 2013
• Contributions (vest in 5 years) :
– Employee: 7.5% for hazardous & 4% for non
– Employer: 8% for hazardous & 5% for non
• Guaranteed Interest Credit: 4% annually with additional credits equal to 75% of return in excess.
![Page 19: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Texas Teachers Retirement System Benefit Design Study
• $11.7 billion/49% increase in closed DB plan liability due to a more liquid asset allocation
• Cost comparison of multiple plan design options– DC most expensive– DB least expensive
19
![Page 20: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pension Benefit Design Study
20
.
Source: Teacher Retirement System of Texas and Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company
![Page 21: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pension Benefit Design Study
21
.
Source: Teacher Retirement System of Texas and Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company
![Page 22: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Realistic simulations of probable worker outcomes in DC plan:
• Workers would have only a 50% chance of reaching 60% of the benefit provided by the DB plan, at the same cost.
Texas Teachers Retirement SystemBenefit Design Study
22
![Page 23: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2013 Public Pension Reforms Texas Teacher Retirement System
Contributions:
• Employee: 6.4% currently increases to 7.7% by 2017.
• State: from 6.4% to 6.8%
• Non-Social Security SD: contribute 1.5% of payroll.
3% COLA – Because actuarially sound, first retiree COLA since 2001.
![Page 24: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Employees Under PEPRA, Estimated to Receive Less than CalPERS Classic
Source: The Emerging Role of Defined Contribution Plans for California Public Employees, CalPERS. April 2014
![Page 25: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Additional Monthly Contribution Needed in DC Savings Plan for PEPRA Employees to Reach Classic CalPERS
Source: The Emerging Role of Defined Contribution Plans for California Public Employees, CalPERS. April 2014
![Page 26: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What Do Americans Think About Retirement? Anxious
How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?
26Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013
![Page 27: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Social Security is Major Source of Income for 75 Percent of Retiree 65+
Source: NIRS Calculations for retirees who did not work from the March 2012 CPS extract from IPUMS
Bottom 25 Middle 50% Top 25% $-
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
Sources of Income of Retirees 65 and Older
OtherInterest, Dividends and RentRetirement IncomeSSI & DisabilitySocial Security
![Page 28: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
45% of All Working-Age Households Have No Assets in Retirement Accounts
Household retirement account ownership by age of head of household, 2010
Source: Author’s analysis of 2010 SCF.
![Page 29: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Retirement Accounts Are Concentrated Among Higher-Income Households
Retirement account ownership status by household income quartile, 2010
Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64. Households with negative earnings excluded. Household income adjusted by marital status for ranking purposes.
![Page 30: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Typical Working-Age Household Has $3,000 in Retirement Assets; Near-Retirement Household Has $12,000
Median retirement account balance, households with retirement accounts vs. all households, 2010
Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M.
![Page 31: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
4 out of 5 Households Have Less than One Times Their Income in Retirement Savings
Retirement account balance as a percentage of income among working households, 2010
Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M.
![Page 32: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Households of Color Are Less than Half as Likely As White Households to Have Retirement Savings at Least Annual Income
Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF microdata. Universe is households with total earnings > $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M. Values may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
![Page 33: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Retirement Benchmarks from Financial Firms: Accumulate 8-11 Times Income
• Fidelity: – retire @ 67– contribute over 42-year career– 15% contribution rate over most
of career, incl. employer match– 85% income replacement
• Aon Hewitt:– retire @ 65– contribute over 40-year career– 15% contribution rate , incl.
employer match– 85% income replacement
Source: Fidelity (2012) and Aon Hewitt (2012)
![Page 34: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Retirement Savings Benchmarks: Large Majority of Working Households Fall Short
Share of working households that do not meet retirement savings targets for their age, by type of measure, 2010.
Source: Author's analysis of 2010 SCF based on retirement savings targets adapted from Fidelity (2012). Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M. * "Total Retirement Assets" measure includes retirement account balances reported in SCF and DB pension assets imputed by author.
![Page 35: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Distribution of Baby Boomer Retirement Wealth, 2010
35
Top 25% Top 10% Top 5%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
83%
56%
37%
4%
96%
Bottom 50% of households by net wealth
Top 50% of households by net wealth
Percentage of Assets
Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances. Retirement wealth includes assets health in retirement accounts, e.g., 401(k)s, IRAs, and KEOGH plans.
![Page 36: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
90th Percentile Household Has Nearly 100 Times the Retirement Savings of Median Household
36Source: M.Morrisey and N. Sabadish. Retirement Inequality. Economic Policy Institute. September 2013
![Page 37: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
DB Pension Benefits Are More Equally Distributed than DC Account Balances
37Source: M.Morrisey and N. Sabadish. Retirement Inequality. Economic Policy Institute. September 2013
DC Retirement Account Balances DB Pension income
![Page 38: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
State Financial Security Scorecard• Scorecard evaluates relative
performance on aging population’s key economic dimensions – income, costs and work.
• States ranked from 1 (best) to 51 (worst) for each variable.
• Rankings converted into scores: 10 (best) to 1 (worst).
![Page 39: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Scorecard Categories/Variables
Retirement Income Retiree Costs Labor Market • Private workplace
retirement plan participation
• Average defined contribution account balance
• Marginal tax rate on pension income
• Medicare out-of-pocket costs
• Medicaid generosity• Housing cost burden
• Unemployment rate for people aged 55 years old and older.
• Median hourly earnings (real) for people aged 55 years old and older
![Page 40: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Washington: Data and Scores
![Page 41: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Retirement Income Scores 2012
![Page 42: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Retiree Cost Scores 2012
![Page 43: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Labor Market Scores 2012
![Page 44: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Overall Scores 2012
![Page 45: NIRS Research on Retirement Security](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568147e2550346895db518b3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Proposals to Expand Retirement Security In Washington & In States
• My RA – announced in STOUS by President Obama.• Automatic IRA Act of 2013 – Introduced by Rep.
Richard Neal would require employers to offer payroll deposit IRAs and offers small employers a tax credit for costs associated with establishing an auto-IRA
• California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust, SB 1234 - opt-out, Auto-IRA concept with a 3% default employee contribution and professional investment management. Mandated study under way.
• Expand the Savers Credit - HR 837 (Rep. Neal)