normal myeloid maturation

56
The Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasia by Flow Cytometry Brent L. Wood MD PhD Dept. of Laboratory Medicine University of Washington, Seattle

Upload: vuquynh

Post on 10-Feb-2017

240 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Normal Myeloid Maturation

The Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasia by Flow Cytometry

Brent L. Wood MD PhDDept. of Laboratory Medicine

University of Washington, Seattle

Page 2: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Basic Principles

Page 3: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Abnormal population identification

• Normal– Antigens expressed in consistent and

reproducible patterns with maturation• Neoplastic

– Increased or decreased normal antigens– Asynchronous maturational expression– Aberrant antigen expression– Homogeneous expression

Page 4: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal B cell Maturation

Wood and Borowitz (2006) Henry’s Laboratory Medicine

Page 5: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal B cell Maturation

Wood (2004) Methods Cell Biology 75:559-576

Page 6: Normal Myeloid Maturation

0.1% abnormal immature B cells

ALL MRD

06-01469

Page 7: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloid Stem Cell Disorders

• Similar immunophenotypic abnormalities– Myelodysplasia– Myeloproliferative disorders– Acute myeloid leukemia

• Differences in– Blast percentage– Extent of maturation– Basophilia– Degree of abnormality

Page 8: Normal Myeloid Maturation

CD45/SS

Borowitz et al (1993) AJCP 100:534-40.Steltzer et al (1993) Ann NY Acad Sci 667:265-280

Page 9: Normal Myeloid Maturation

CD45/SS

Wood (2004) Methods Cell Biology 75:559-576

Page 10: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 11: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Early Progenitors

Page 12: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Blasts• Blasts are morphologically defined

– AML is > 20% blasts in blood or bone marrow

• Morphologic “blasts” include– Stem cells– Committed progenitors (CD34+)– Promyelocytes– Promonocytes– Immature B cell precursors– Immature T cell precursors

Page 13: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Blasts

Page 14: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Blasts• Blast estimates by flow cytometry may not agree with morphology

– Specimen processing

Red blood cell lysing reagents remove variable number of erythroid precursorsVariable degree of peripheral blood dilution

• Blast estimate may be high or low depending on relative contributions– Not a problem for peripheral blood

– Blasts defined differently by morphology and flow cytometry• Include promonocytes, promyelocytes, immature B cells as appropriate

Page 15: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Blast Maturation

Wood (2004) Methods Cell Biology 75:559-576

Page 16: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Granulocyte Maturation

Page 17: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Monocyte Maturation

Page 18: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Wood and Borowitz (2006) Henry’s Laboratory Medicine

Page 19: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Abnormal Antigen Intensity

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 20: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Aberrant Lymphoid Antigens

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 21: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Aberrant Maturation

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 22: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Granulocytic Maturation

Page 23: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Granulocytic Maturation

Wood and Borowitz (2006) Henry’s Laboratory Methods

Page 24: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Granulocytic Maturation

Wood (2004) Methods Cell Biology 75:559-576

Page 25: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 26: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Monocytic Maturation

Page 27: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Monocytic Maturation

Wood and Borowitz (2006) Henry’s Laboratory Methods

Page 28: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Normal Monocytic Maturation

Wood (2004) Methods Cell Biology 75:559-576

Page 29: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Monocytic Aberrancies

Wood (2007) Clinics in Lab Medicine 27:551-575

Page 30: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Wood and Borowitz (2006) Henry’s Laboratory Medicine

Page 31: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Acute Monocytic Leukemia

Page 32: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Abnormal Myeloid Maturation

Normal

MDS

Page 33: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative Disorders

Page 34: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative disorders• CML

– Decreased CD16 expression on mature neutrophils– Decreased CD32 expression by mature neutrophils– Decreased L-selectin (CD62L) expression on the CD34-positive

cells– Aberrant expression of CD56 on the blasts and myeloid cells– Aberrant expression of lymphoid antigens such as CD2, CD5, and

CD7 on the blasts in CML blast crisis as well as CD7 expression on CD34-positive cells in chronic phase

Page 35: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

04-5708

CML in chronic phase - 2.8% blasts

Page 36: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative disorders

• Non-CML– Increased expression of Bcl-XL in polycythemia vera– Decreased platelet GPIa/IIa, decreased GP1b and

GPIIb/IIIa, and elevated platelet P-selectin, thrombospondin, GPIV, and c-Mpl in essential thrombocytosis

– Aberrant coexpression of CD14 and CD66 on the myeloid cells in a subset of myeloproliferativedisorders

Page 37: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative Disorders

• 76 cases referred for evaluation of MPD– All t(9;22) negative– Caveat: Diagnosis of all cases studied not known

• Evaluated by 4 color flow cytometry• Analyzed for abnormalities of blast, myeloid

and monocyte maturation• Compared with cytogenetics

Kussick and Wood (2002) Am J Clin Path 20:854-865

Page 38: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Essential Thrombocytosis

Kussick and Wood (2002) Am J Clin Path 20:854-865

Page 39: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative Disorders

Population n Mean Age M:FAbnormal

Cytogenetics

Positive Flow(cases) 34 69.6 16:18 12 / 29 (41%)

Negative Flow(controls) 40 55.4 18:22 0 / 36

Kussick and Wood (2002) Am J Clin Path 20:854-865

Page 40: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myeloproliferative disorders

# ofCytog.Abnls. n

Abnl.Blasts

Abnl.Myelos.

Abnl.Monos.

MeanAbnl.Myel.Ags.

MeanNon-Myel.Ags.

MeanTotalAbnl.Ags.

0 17 94% 100% 56% 3.8 0.8 4.61 8 100% 88% 50% 4.4 0.6 5.0

2 ormore 4 100% 75% 75% 5.8 0.5 6.3

TOTAL 29 97% 93% 55% 4.2 0.7 4.9

Kussick and Wood (2002) Am J Clin Path 20:854-865

Page 41: Normal Myeloid Maturation

MPD Conclusions• Many cases of non-CML myeloproliferative

disorders have immunophenotypicabnormalities

• Presence of immunophenotypicabnormalities correlates with cytogenetics– All cases with cytogenetic abnormalities had

flow cytometric abnormalities– Number of immunophenotypic abnormalities

paralleled increase in cytogenetic abnormalities• Abnormalities less frequent in PV and ET

Page 42: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myelodysplasia

Page 43: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Early Studies• Many isolated abnormalities described

– loss of erythrocyte A, B, and H antigens– decreased expression of c-Mpl, GPIIb/IIIa, and GPIb on platelets in

refractory anemia– dyssynchronous expression of CD11b and CD16 in the developing

neutrophils– aberrant coexpression of CD14 and CD66 on myeloid cells– decreased CD10 on neutrophils– changes in a variety of leukocyte activation antigens, including FcR

I, FcRII, and FcR III– greater variability in the expression of CD38, CD71, CD13, and

CD33 in refractory anemia

– aberrant coexpression of CD56 on myeloid blasts

Elghetany MT. Haematologica. (1998) 83:1104-15.

Page 44: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility

• Can distinguish MDS from normal and AA– Large panel of antibodies– Abnormalities in myeloid, erythroid and megs– Compared with morphology and cytogenetics– Abnormalities in subset of indeterminate cases

• Not advocated for screening

Stetler-Stevenson, et al. Blood (2001) 98:979-987.

Page 45: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility• Correlation with IPSS and transplant outcome

Wells, et al. Blood (2003) 102: 394-403.

Page 46: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility

Wells, et al. Blood (2003) 102: 394-403.

Page 47: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility• Correlation with IPSS and transplant outcome

– Scoring system• 0 points = Normal• 1 point = Single abnormality• 2 points = 2 or 3 abnormalities OR CD34/lymphoid on myelomonocytic• 3 points = 4 abnormalities OR 1-3 abnormalities with CD34/lymphoid• 4 points = 2 to 3 abnormalities on myeloid and monocytic• Additional abnormal blasts: <5% (1), 6-10% (2), 11-20% (3), >20% (4)

• 0-1 = Normal/mild• 2-3 = Moderate• 4-9 = Severe

– Diagnosis of MDS• Score of 3 gives specificity of 100% with sensitivity of 55%; 76% correct

– Correlates with IPSS and transplant outcome

Wells, et al. Blood (2003) 102: 394-403.

Page 48: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility

Wells, et al. Blood (2003) 102: 394-403.

Page 49: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical utility

Wells, et al. Blood (2003) 102: 394-403.

Page 50: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Blast score in LG-MDS

Ogata, et al (2006) Blood 108:1037-1044

Page 51: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Erythroid Dysplasia

• Patient populations– 104 MDS– 69 Pathologic controls– 19 Normals

• Evaluated MFI– CD71– CD105– Cytosolic H&L-ferritin (HF

or LF)– Mitochondrial ferritin (MtF)

Della Porta, et al. Leukemia (2006) 20:549-555

Page 52: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Erythroid Dysplasia

• Linear Discriminant Analysis– MDS with erythroid dysplasia -

• 52/53 positive = 98.1% sensitivity

– MDS without erythroid dysplasia• 9/15 positive = 60%

– Normal and pathologic controls• 64/65 negative = 98.5% specificity

– MtF positive in all cases with ringed sideroblasts

Della Porta, et al. Leukemia (2006) 20:549-555

Page 53: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Clinical Diagnosis

• 124 cases submitted for myelodysplasia• Assessed by 4 color flow cytometry• Analyzed for maturational aberrancies

– Negative = no abnormalities– Indeterminate = mild abnormalities (< 2)– Positive = more than mild abnormalities (>= 2)

• Compared with cytogenetics and morphology– MDS = either cytogenetics and/or morphology

Kussick, et al. AJCP (2005) 124: 170-181

Page 54: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Distribution of cases by cytogenetic, morphologic, and flow cytometric findings.

CYTOGENETICS MORPHOLOGY  FLOW

CYTOMETRY      Normal Indeterm. Abnormal     Normal 31 12 0

Normal* Indeterminate 12 3 7  Abnormal 3 3 20     Normal 0 0 0

Abnormal* Indeterminate 1 1 1  Abnormal 0 0 30

Myelodysplasia

N = 124

Kussick, et al. AJCP (2005) 124: 170-181

Page 55: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Myelodysplasia

MDS = abnormal morphology and/or cytogeneticsFlow abnormal

89% sensitivity88% specificity

Flow abnormal or indeterminate95% sensitivity67% specificity

Also true for cases with < 5% blasts84% flow abnormal were MDS

Kussick, et al. AJCP (2005) 124: 170-181

Page 56: Normal Myeloid Maturation

Conclusion• Flow cytometry can aid in diagnosis of MDS and MPD

– More confident diagnosis• Identify immunophenotypic abnormalities• Exclude other disorders

– Aid subclassification• More accurate blast identification and quantitation

– Assist in prognostication– Rapid

• Requires– Consistent flow cytometric technique – Knowing normal patterns of antigen expression – Knowing common abnormal patterns