norway relativistic hydrodynamics and freeze-out lászló csernai (bergen computational physics...
TRANSCRIPT
Norway
Relativistic Relativistic Hydrodynamics and Hydrodynamics and
Freeze-outFreeze-out
Relativistic Relativistic Hydrodynamics and Hydrodynamics and
Freeze-outFreeze-out
László Csernai (Bergen Computational Physics Lab., Univ. of Bergen)
?
Relativistic Fluid DynamicsRelativistic Fluid Dynamics
Eg.: from kinetic theory. BTE for the evolution of phase-space distribution:
Then using microscopic conservation laws in the collision integral C:
These conservation laws are valid for any, eq. or non-eq. distribution, f(x,p). These cannot be solved, more info is needed!
Boltzmann H-theorem: (i) for arbitrary f, the entropy increases, (ii) for stationary, eq. solution the entropy is maximal,
P = P (e,n) Solvable for local equilibrium!
EoSEoS
Relativistic Fluid DynamicsRelativistic Fluid DynamicsFor any EoS, P=P(e,n), and any energy-momentum tensor in LE(!):
Not only for high v!
Local Equilibration, Fluids
Fluid components, Friction
-------------- One fluid >>> E O E O SS -------------- One fluid >>> E O E O SS
Hadronization, chemical FO, kinetic FO
Freeze Out >>> Detectors
Stages of a CollisionStages of a CollisionStages of a CollisionStages of a Collision
Collective flow reveals the EoS ifwe have dominantly one fluid with local equilibrium in a substantial part of the space-time domain of the collision !!!
QGP EoS QGP EoS One fluidOne fluid
HadronizatiHadronizationon Chemical Freeze Chemical Freeze
OutOut Kinetic Freeze OutKinetic Freeze Out
Initi
al st
ate
time
Heavy Colliding SystemHeavy Colliding SystemHeavy Colliding SystemHeavy Colliding System
IdealizatioIdealizationsnsFO LayerFO Layer
FO HSFO HS
Small SystemSmall SystemSmall SystemSmall System
timeInitial state, Pre-equilibrium, cascade, Multi
Component Fluidno unique EoS Hadronization & Freeze Out
(One-Fluid)
FDFD
Multi Module ModelingMulti Module ModelingMulti Module ModelingMulti Module Modeling
• A: Initial state - Fitted to measured data (?)• B: Initial state - Pre-equilibrium: Parton
Cascade; Coherent Yang-Mills [Magas]• Local Equilibrium Hydro, EoS• Final Freeze-out: Kinetic models, measurables.
- If QGP Sudden and simultaneous hadronization and freeze out (indicated by HBT, Strangeness, Entropy puzzle)
Landau (1953), Milekhin (1958), Cooper & Frye (1974)
Fire streak picture - Only in 3 dimensions!Fire streak picture - Only in 3 dimensions!
Myers, Gosset, Kapusta, Westfall
String rope --- Flux tube --- Coherent YM field
Initial state
3rd flow component
3-dim Hydro for RHIC Energies
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=0.0 fm/c, Tmax= 420 MeV, emax= 20.0 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
EoS: p= e/3 - 4B/3, B = 397 MeV/fm3 8.7 x 4.4 fm
3-dim Hydro for RHIC EnergiesAu+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=2.3 fm/c, Tmax= 420 MeV, emax= 20.0 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
11.6 x 4.6 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=4.6 fm/c, Tmax= 419 MeV, emax= 19.9 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
14.5 x 4.9 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=6.9 fm/c, Tmax= 418 MeV, emax= 19.7 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
17.4 x 5.5 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=9.1 fm/c, Tmax= 417 MeV, emax= 19.6 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
20.3 x 5.8 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=11.4 fm/c, Tmax= 416 MeV, emax= 19.5 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
23.2 x 6.7 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=13.7 fm/c, Tmax= 417 MeV, emax= 19.4 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
26.1 x 7.3 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=16.0 fm/c, Tmax= 417 MeV, emax= 19.4 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
31.9 x 8.1 fm
Au+Au ECM=65 GeV/nucl. b=0.5 bmax Aσ=0.08 => σ~10 GeV/fm
e [ GeV / fm3 ] T [ MeV]
t=18.2 fm/c, Tmax= 417 MeV, emax= 19.4 GeV/fm3, Lx,y= 1.45 fm, Lz=0.145 fm
. .
34.8 x 8.7 fm
Global Flow patterns:Directed
Transverse flow
Elliptic flow
3rd flow component(anti - flow)
Squeeze out
3rd flow component
Hydro
[Csernai, HIPAGS’93]
[Phys.Lett.B458(99)454]Csernai & Röhrich
“Wiggle”, Pb+Pb, Elab=40 and 158GeV [NA49]
A. Wetzler
Preliminary
158 GeV/A
The “wiggle” is there!
v1 < 0
Flow is a diagnostic toolFlow is a diagnostic toolFlow is a diagnostic toolFlow is a diagnostic tool
Impact Impact par.par.
Transparency – Transparency – string tensionstring tension
EquilibrationEquilibrationtimetime
Consequence:Consequence:vv11(y), v(y), v22(y), …(y), …
• Kinetic freeze out: Strongly interacting matter becomes dilute and cold, the momentum distr. of particles in the absence of collisions freezes out and the particles propagate toward the detectors.
• Sometimes sequential FO is assumed: Chemical + Kinetic FO
• Now: Rapid, simultaneous FO and hadronization from super-cooled QGP in a thin layer (2-3 fm). The process of gradual FO is followed by kinetic description.
What is Freeze Out (FO) ???What is Freeze Out (FO) ???What is Freeze Out (FO) ???What is Freeze Out (FO) ???
(A)- identification of the Freeze Out Hyper-Surface (FOHS) [B. Schlei]
(B)- idealized FO over the FOHS
(C)- FO over a finite LAYER & described by kinetic theory, by the MBTE.
(A) – Movies:
B=0, T-fo = 139MeV
B=0, T-fo = 180MeV
B=0.4, T-fo = 139MeV
B=0.4, T-fo = 180MeV
[Bernd Schlei, Los Alamos, [Bernd Schlei, Los Alamos, LA-UR-03-3410]
• (B) - Freeze out over FOHS- post FO distribution?= 1st.: n, T, u, cons. Laws != 2nd.: non eq. f(x,p) !!! -> (C)
• (Ci) Simple kinetic model• (Cii) Covariant, kinetic F.O. description• (Ciii) Freeze out form transport equation
• Note: ABC together is too involved!B & C can be done separately -> f(x,p)
(A) Freeze out as a (A) Freeze out as a discontinuitydiscontinuity
• Theory of discontinuities in relativistic flow (only space-like), [Taub, 1948]
• Generalization for both time-like and space-like discontinuities, [1987]
• 1st problem: We must use the correct parameters of the matter in the Post FO distribution
Matching conditions:
Discontinuity = where the properties of matter change suddenly
normal vector
=> n, T, u=> n, T, u
(A) Modified Cooper-Frye (A) Modified Cooper-Frye FormulaFormula
• The number of particles crossing,
• The kinetic definition of the particle four-flow
• Cooper-Frye formula, Cooper and Frye, 1975
• 2nd : Problem of negative contributions, on the space-like part of the hyper-surface, Sinyukov, et al.
• Sharp cut-off proposed, Bugaev, 1996• Solved, kinetic model, Anderlik et al. 1999,
Magas et al. 1999
Not known form hydro !
Kinetic freeze out models,Kinetic freeze out models,(a) just FO(a) just FO
Assumptions:• only short range interactions• one dimensional geometry• assume stationary flow, no explicit time
dependence
• Simple kinetic model
• Kinetic model (b) with re-scattering, re-thermalization:
Reference FramesReference Frames
• Pre FO – Local Rest frame of the gas, where the matter is at rest = Rest Frame of the Gas (RFG), moving with the peak of the Pre-FO distribution
• Post FO – Rest Frame of the Front, (RFF) attached to the FO front
p’x
(a)(a) Reproduced the Reproduced the cut Juttnercut Juttner distribution as the post FO distribution as the post FO distribution, --- but: the other half of distribution, --- but: the other half of the distribution remained there, the distribution remained there, interacting for everinteracting for ever
(b)(b) Gradually all matter froze out, no Gradually all matter froze out, no negative contribution, result negative contribution, result approximated by CJ distribution --- approximated by CJ distribution --- but: it took infinite time – unrealistic. but: it took infinite time – unrealistic.
Bondorf et al. [NP A296 (‘78) 320.]: Sph. Expansion -> Bondorf et al. [NP A296 (‘78) 320.]: Sph. Expansion -> increasing divergence & adiabatic cooling -> descreasing increasing divergence & adiabatic cooling -> descreasing random thermal flux <vrandom thermal flux <vrel FO without any collision beyond some radius !!!
22ndnd problem is not finished yet !!! problem is not finished yet !!!22ndnd problem is not finished yet !!! problem is not finished yet !!!
Feasibility: a realistic hydro model + a realistic FOHS modelwith Cooper Fry type FO is theonly manageable model (B).
However, a realistic post FO distribution should be used (!), and this should be investigated (C).
The Boltzmann Transport Equation and Freeze OutThe Boltzmann Transport Equation and Freeze Out
Freeze out is :
• Strongly directed process: • Delocalized:• The m.f.p. - reaches infinity • Finite characteristic length
Modified Boltzmann Transport Equation for Freeze Out
description
The change is not negligible in the FO direction
The Boltzmann Transport EquationThe Boltzmann Transport Equation
A nonlinear equation for dilute gasses, with the following assumptions:
1. Only binary collisions2. The molecular chaos – no correlations: gives the
number of collisions at the respective point
3. A smoothly varying function compared to the m.f.p.
1
2
3
4
Gain term Loss term
The Modified Boltzmann Transport EquationThe Modified Boltzmann Transport Equation
• Introducing, and the FO probability –
which feeds the free component
FO probablity not included !!!
re-thermalization term
free component
interacting component
MBTE ->MBTE -> MBTE ->MBTE ->
The invariant “ Escape” probability in finite layer
The escape form the int to free component
• Not to collide, depends on remaining distance
•If the particle momentum is not normal to the surface, the spatial distance increases
Early models:
1
The invariant “ Escape” probabilityThe invariant “ Escape” probability
Escape probability factors for different points on FO hypersurface, in the RFG. Momentum values are in units of [mc]
A B C
D E F
t’
x’
[RFG][RFG]
Results – the cooling and retracting of the interacting matterResults – the cooling and retracting of the interacting matter
Space-Like FO Time-Like FO
cooling
retracting
Cut-off factor flow velocity No Cut-off
[RFF] [RFF]
Results – the momentum distributionResults – the momentum distribution
Space-Like FO Time-Like FO
asymmetric elongated in FO direction
curved due to the FO process
[RFF] [RFF]
Results – the contour lines of the FO distribution, f(p)Results – the contour lines of the FO distribution, f(p)
Space-Like FO Time-Like FO
jump in [RFF]
With different initial flow velocities
[RFF] [RFF]
Time-like FO
• Post FO distributions are non – thermal !• Conservation laws must be satisfied !• Post FO distributions must be calculated
from transport theory, or can be approximated with adequate ansatz (Cancelling Juttner distribution)
• Note(!) BTE is not applicable, molecular chaos, and smoothness of the phase space distribution are not applicable for the FO process. Adequate MD models or MBTE models should be applied.
Conclusions
Posters: 2/39 Bravina 2/56 Zschocke 4/125 Zabrodin 5/150 Manninen10/270 Magas 10/272 Molnar, E.