norwegian russian business forum...q2 ‘12 q3’12 2013-2014 2016 capital required usd m (expected...
TRANSCRIPT
Norwegian Russian Business Forum
Oslo 2012-10-24
Harald Martinsen CDO/Utviklingsdirektør
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
Corporate overview
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
•3 3
• 100% owner of SVG iron ore mine, Norway
• Operated from 1910 to 1997 (200Mt of ore mined)
• Listed on the ASX in Dec 2007, mining commenced in May 2009 and first shipment in Nov 2009
• High quality magnetite concentrate
• Long term offtake contract with key European customer in place
• Long mine life expected
SVG project in Kirkenes
3
•4
Open Cut Mine – min 25 Yr mine life
8km Railway – owner and sole user
Concentrator – high quality magnetite concentrate Port – efficient and uncongested
• Market Overview
• Market cap at ASX (Australia) ca. A$ 330m • In NOK ca. 2 mrd • Accummulated investments since restart: ca. 2 mrd
• Largest Shareholders
• Tschudi Mining: ~20 % • OM Holdings Ltd: ~14 % • Eley Griffiths Pty Ltd: ~8 %
• Safety
• Company days without LTI: (2012-06-21) • Mine 96
• Record: 140 • Processing plant 5
• Record: 555
• Strategic Review • Process launched Nov 2011 - Goldman Sachs as advisor • Awaiting potential bids
Corporate Overview
5
¨ Indian company AB Birla and Russian (Swiss) company Prominvest have completed due dil
¨ Both based on unbinding bids at around AUD 1,40 per share
¨ Binding bids are expected shortly if at all ¨ NFE recently launced Entitlement offer of up to
AUD 55,5 million ¡ Underwritten by Goldman Sachs
•6
•7
Europe uses ca. 20% of the world’s mineral resources
Europe produces ca. 3 % of
the world’s mineral resources
2012: 1,8 mill t To Europe
2012: 0,7 mill t To China
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
Market & Fundamentals
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
¨ Market dominated by 3 huge, global players ¨ China dominates the demand side, specially given
the growth of the market ¨ In response to Chinese growth, we have seen the
following; ¡ Many aggressive expansion plans ¡ Old mines are being re-opened or considered ¡ «New» areas considered for development
¨ The market have responded «quick & dirty» to Chinese growth
¨ Over supply when Chinese growth was reduced ¡ Strong pressure on prices
•9
•10
Europe uses ca. 20% of the world’s mineral resources
Europe produces ca. 3 % of
the world’s mineral resources
•11
RGP4
RGP5
RGP6
Quantum 1
Hope Downs Stg 2Mesa A
Brockman 4
Pilbara 330mt Stg 1
Pilbara 330mt Stg 2
Simandou
Carajas
Carajas
Carajas Serra Sul
Apolo
Vargem Grande Itabiritos
FMG - 55
Sishen
Sishen South
Minas Rio - Phase 1
Sudeste Phase 2
Sudeste Phase 3 Namisa
Casa de Piedra
FMG - 95
FMG - 155
Hope Downs 4
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
mt
RIO Vale FMG Anglo American MMX CSN Hope Downs 4
•SVG expanded
•Sydvaranger
•Source: Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
•Sydvaranger Gruve •12
97,50 $US/tonne (13-09-12)
¨ Also EU have done some important work ¨ A mineral strategy revealed that EU consumes 20% of
worlds minerals and produce only 3% ¨ European countries encouraged to reconsider their
mineral opportunities ¨ «Look to the North» ¨ All Nordic countries now working on mineral strategies ¨ Result is a large number of «projects» in the Barents
region ¨ LKAB expansion, Northland, SVG, Rana and many
more
•13
•14
Europe uses ca. 20% of the world’s mineral resources
Europe produces ca. 3 % of
the world’s mineral resources
41
Kvannevann (Rana Gruber AS)
Kiruna (LKAB)
Malmberget (LKAB) Kaunisvaara
(Northland Resources Ltd)
Sydvaranger(Northern Iron Ltd)
Dannemora(Dannemora Minerals AB)
Port of Narvik
Port of LuleaMala
Stockholm
Norway
SwedenFinland
Oslo
Hannukainen(Northland Resources Ltd)
Tromso
Grangesberg (Grangesberg Iron)
Ludvika Mines (Nordic Iron Ore)
Boliden District (Boliden AB)
Gruvberget (LKAB)
Kallak (Beowulf Mining plc)
Kevitsa Project (International Finance
Corporation)
Kolari (Tertiary Minerals)
Leveäniemi (LKAB)Mertainen (LKAB)
Ruoutevare (Beowulf Mining plc)
Talvivaara (Talvivaara Mining
Company PLC)
Viscaria (Avalon Minerals Ltd.)
Adak(Avalon Minerals Ltd.)
Bidjovagge
Sakatti
Iron Ore/steel facility
Zinc
Nickel
Copper/Gold
Base MetalsKola MMC
(MMC Norilsk)
Olkon(Olenogorsk GOK)
Kovdorsky(Eurochem)
Karelsky Okatysh(Severstal)
St. Petersburg
¨ High quality iron ore concentrate ¨ Relatively small operations (LKAB is exception) ¨ Mainly slig producers (- LKAB, Rana) ¨ High cost countries (less Russia) ¨ Challenging market position ¨ Maximize sales to European market ¨ The balance must be shipped to China (- LKAB) ¨ Freight disadvantage to China ¨ The Northern Sea Route
•16
Global Iron Ore Cost Curve
17
1. Source: AME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1 000 1 200 1 400
FOB
Cos
ts (U
S$/t
)
Cumulative Production (Mt)
Sydvaranger Iron
The way forward - improvements
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
19
NORTHERN IRON VALUE CREATION STRATEGY
n Double the concentrate production capacity to 5.6 Mtpa
n Change out the mining fleet with larger equipment
n Achieve a 2.8 Mtpa
production rate during CY12
n Achieve sub 5% silica from April 2012
n Achieve sub 4% silica
for blast furnace pellet feed
n Achieve sub 2% silica for direct reduced iron (DRI) pellet feed
n Upgrade the port to handle cape size vessels
Long life, cost competitive
provider of high quality iron ore
pellet feed to customers in
Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
n Currently running
at ~2.1 Mtpa n 5.8% silica content
TODAY
ACHIEVE NAMEPLATE
OPTIMISE NAMEPLATE
EXPAND PRODUCTION
VISION
Q2 ‘12 Q3’12 2013-2014 2016
Capital required USD m (expected to be satisfied from operating cash flows)
16.0 16(already
committed)
280.0 50.0 – 60.0
– 360.0
Note: capital costs in 2013-2016 are at scoping study level
of accuracy.
Expansion capital costs vary based on
tailings disposal option selected.
Expected LOM operating costs (real) USD / dmt
< 50 < 55 < 40
Expected life of mine sales price FOB (% from base case)
100% 120% 120%
20
Logistics – Port upgrade & NSR n Three main activities required to enable cape
sized vessels to be loaded at Kirkenes: — Upgrade the shiploader to fit cape size — Dredging the berth to required depth — Additional silo to take total storage capacity
to approx. 240,000 dmt
n Current Status — Basic engineering commenced — Expected Capital Cost USD 30m — Expected Commissing: 2014
n Benefits — Lower shipping costs give higher FOB price
realised, especially for Asian sales
n Northern Sea Route — 40% saving on time, cost and CO2 — Who gets the benefits..? — Follow development closely — Total infrastructure development
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
21
HIGHER CONCENTRATE QUALITY
NFE’s and Noramco Engineering have identified conceptual pathways to higher quality products. Estimates are at a scoping study level of accuracy Sub 4% Silica Concentrate
n Additional magnetic separaton capacity required n Larger tailings thickener required n Additional water sources required n No additional environmental approvals required,
though local government building approval for the thickener required, and approval for additional water usage required from the National authority
n Capital Cost: USD 7m n Expected commissing: January 2014 n Improved pricing expected, and possible increased
European sales.
Sub 2% Silica Concentrate n All 4% equipment listed above required n Flotation plant required n Environmental approval required for disposal of
tailings from the flotation plant – either marine or dry tailings options
n Capital Cost: USD 20m n Earliest commissioning: January 2014 n Improved pricing expected, plus increased sales to
Europe and the Middle East
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
•22
SVG requires 2 main approvals to proceed with the expansion project:
¨ Local Government land use approval ¨ Environmental permits for the increase in mineral
and other waste emissions (KLIF)
To obtain these approvals the following activities and timeline is expected: ü Technical scope has been delivered ü Dialogue conferences held and conclusions made ü Present proposed planning program to SVK ü Public hearing of the planning program Ø Approval of the Scope of Work for the Environmental
and Social Consequences Investigation – Q4 2012 Ø Completion of the Consequences Investigation and
submission of the applications and reports – Q3 2013 Ø Decision from local government and national
envirornment agency on land use and emission applications – Q4 2013
Expansion - Permitting and Approvals
Tailings Disposal Objective study Evaluation of alternatives Credible monitoring and control procedure
Resource base (life time) Upgrade resources Look outside concession boarders Present a credible case
Distribution of financial resources
Social accounting Federal vs local taxation Sponsoring & participation Document local impact
Human Resources Most critical resource Recruiting Training and competence
•23
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
The political process
Takk for oppmerksomheten..! Thanks for your attention..!
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
Appendix
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
VIKINGOZ\Presentations (Company)\20120821 - Management Presentation\201208 - Management Presentation (part 1).pptx
MAP OF SYDVARANGER MINERAL DEPOSITS
26
136.8 Mt @ 32% Fe
Bjornevatn 282.9 Mt @
31% Fe
11.8 Mt @ 33% Fe
Kjellmansasen 17.4 Mt @
32% Fe
11.2 Mt @ 31% Fe
Tverrdalen 46.8 Mt @
31% Fe
6.7Mt @ 30% Fe
Fisketind 30.3 Mt @
31% Fe
Bjornfell 13.6 Mt @
32% Fe
Sostervann 4.7 Mt @ 37% Fe
Grundtjernn 2.9 Mt @ 34% Fe
Fisketind SW 17.5 Mt @
33% Fe
Jerntoppen 17.0 Mt @
31% Fe
N
Reserve
Pit Name
Resource
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
Mineral Resource Summary as at 01 February 2012 (at 15% Fe total cut-off grade)
Deposit Indicated (Mt)
Fe (Total%)
Inferred (Mt)
Fe (Total %)
Total Tonnes
(Mt) Fe
(Total %)
Bjørnevatn 146.2 32 136.7 30 282.9 31 Kjellmannsåsen 13.2 33 4.2 30 17.4 32
Fisketind Øst 11.1 31 19.2 31 30.3 31 Tverrdalen 20.4 32 26.4 31 46.8 31
Hyttemalmen 0.4 34 1.0 32 1.4 32 Bjornfell 13.6 32 13.6 32
Söstervann 4.7 37 4.7 37 Grundtjern 2.9 34 2.9 34
Fisketind SW 17.5 33 17.5 33 Jerntoppen 17.0 31 17.0 31
Total 191.3 32 243.2 31 434.5 31
Reserve Summary as at 01 February 2012 (at 15% Fe total cut-off grade)
Deposit Probable
Reserve (Mt) Fe
(Total%)
Kjellmannsåsen 11.8 33
Hyttemalmen 0 0 Bjørnevatn 136.8 32 Tverdalen 11.2 31
Fisketind Øst 6.7 30
Total
166.5
32
n A drilling program commenced in May 2011 aimed at:
— Providing infill drilling data
— Testing a number of greenfield targets within the existing concession area
n Additional resource and reserve upgrades are expected during 2012 as infill drilling converts Inferred to Indicated Resources
RESOURCE / RESERVES
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
VIKINGOZ\Presentations (Company)\20120821 - Management Presentation\201208 - Management Presentation (part 1).pptx
OVERVIEW OF PROCESSING FACILITIES
28
Sydvaranger Gruve AS
•29
• An engineering scoping study examining doubling concentrate production has been completed by Noramco Engineering Corporation and Barr Engineering, with second opinions on cost and concept provided by major Norwegian engineering consultancy Multiconsult and SRK Consulting (UK)
• The study examined four possible plant concepts to lift total SVG production to 5.6 Mtpa: ú Duplication of existing plant within existing buildings ú Construction of a new 2.8 Mtpa standalone plant adjacent to the existing facility at
Kirkenes ú Construction of a new 2.8 Mtpa plant at the mine site at Bjørnevatn ú A “hybrid solution” with primary grinding at mine site and pumping of slurry to
separators and filtering at Kirkenes
• The study also examined three different tailings disposal options: ú Continued use of the existing marine disposal system approved for the existing plant ú Construction of tailings dams adjacent to the mine site for disposal of wet tailings ú Construction of a dry tailings disposal plant for disposal of dried tailings into the
planned mine waste dumps