notes on the solow modelpfwang.people.ust.hk/advanced macro lecture note 2-solow...notes on the...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Notes on the Solow Model
Pengfei Wang
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
2010
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 1 / 32
-
Introduction: Basic Facts about Economic Growth
Small di¤erence in growth rate can make large di¤erence in income inthe long run.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 2 / 32
-
Introduction: Basic Facts about Economic Growth(continued)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 3 / 32
-
Questions to be Addressed
How important is the rate of capital accumulation to a nationseconomic growth?
What are the economic forces that ultimately allow poor countries tocatch up with the richest countries in living standards?
How does a nations growth rate evolve over time? Is there a limit? Ifso, what determines the limit the rate of saving? the rate ofpopulation growth? or the amount of natural resources?
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 4 / 32
-
Assumption
There is only a single good, so relative prices do not play any role;
There is no money and no government spending, so government doesnot play any role;
Full employment at all time, so unemployment does not matter;
Except inputs, the production technology does not change over time;
There are only two types of inputs: capital and labor;
The rates of saving, depreciation, population growth, and technologyprogress are constant.
These features are both defects and virtues of the model.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 5 / 32
-
Assumption (continued)
More specically and mathematically, we have
Production functionY = F (Kt ,AtLt ) (1)
where K denotes capital stock, A denotes labor productivity, Ldenotes labor units.
Properties:
F01 > 0,F
02 > 0,F
0012 > 0,F
0021 > 0,F
001 < 0,F
002 < 0 (2)
F (λK ,AλL) = λF (K , L) for λ > 0
limx!0F 0(x , y) = ∞; limy!0F 0(x , y) = ∞ (3)limx!∞F 0(x , y) = 0; limy!∞F 0(x , y) = 0
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 6 / 32
-
Assumption (continued)
More specically and mathematically, we have
Resource Allocation
St = It = sYt (4)
Ct + It = Yt
Evolution of Inputs
K̇t = It � δKt (5)Ȧt = gAtL̇t = nLt
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 7 / 32
-
Model Dynamics
Per-e¤ective labor economy: Dene x = XAL then
y =F (K ,AL)AL
= F (KAL, 1) = f (k) (6)
c + i = y (7)
k̇ + (g + n)k = i � δk (8)where
k̇ =d( KAL )dt
=K̇AL� K (ȦL+ AL̇)
(AL)2=K̇AL� (g + n)k (9)
andK̇AL
= i � δk (10)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 8 / 32
-
Model Dynamics (continued)
the property of f (k) = F ( KAL , 1)
f 0(k) = F01(K ,AL) (11)
f 0(k) =∂hF (K ,AL)AL
i∂( KAL )
=∂F (K ,AL)
∂K= F1(K ,AL) > 0 (12)
f00(k) =
∂F1(K ,AL)
∂( KAL )= ALF11(K ,AL) < 0 (13)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 9 / 32
-
Steady-State
A steady state of a dynamic system is a situation where all the variables inthe system are constant, xt = x̄ . Assuming that a steady state exists inthe transformed Solow model, then
k̇ = ċ = ẏ = i̇ = 0, (14)
i.eXAL
= const for X = K ,Y ,C , I (15)
soK̇K=ẎY=ĊC=İI= g + n (16)
this is so called balanced growth path.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 10 / 32
-
Stabability of Steady-State
In S-S, (8) impliesı̄ = (δ+ g + n)k̄ (17)
andk̇t = sf (kt )� (g + n+ δ)kt = π(kt ) (18)
the steady-state k̄ is given by
sf (k̄) = (g + n+ δ)k̄ (19)
Noticeπ0(k) = sf 0(k)� (g + n+ δ);π00(k) = sf 00(k) < 0 (20)
so we havek̇t > 0 if kt < k̄ ;k̇t < 0 if kt > k̄ (21)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 11 / 32
-
Stabability of Steady-State
The phase diagram
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 12 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate
In S-S we havesf (k̄) = (g + n+ δ)k̄. (22)
totally di¤erentiating this equation gives
f (k)ds + sf 0(k)dk = (g + n+ δ)dk, (23)
which implies
dkds=
f (k)(g + n+ δ)� sf (0k) =
f (k)
s f (k )k � sf 0(k)(24)
ordk/kds/s
=f (k)
f (k)� f 0(k)k =1
1� α > 0 (25)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 13 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
Note 1: α is output elasticity of capital, we must have
0 < α < 1 (26)
Proof:
α =f 0(k)kf (k)
> 0 (27)
is easy to see.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 14 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
To see α < 1, we have
α =F 01(K ,AL)KF (K ,AL)
(28)
Notice by constant return to scale, we have
F (λK ,λAL) = λF (K ,AL) (29)
totally di¤erentiating with respect to λ, and evaluated λ = 1
F 01(K ,AL)K + F02(K ,AL)AL = Y (30)
and F02 > 0, so we have
α < 1 (31)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 15 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
E¤ect on outputdyds=dfdkdkds
(32)
we havedy/yds/s
= (dfdkky)(dkdssk) =
α
1� α > 0
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 16 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
E¤ect on consumption
c = (1� s)f (k) (33)
we have
dcds
= �f (k) + (1� s)f 0 dkds
= �f (k) + (1� s)(kff 0)fk(dkdssk)ks
= �f (k) + (1� s) α1� α
f (k)s
(34)
so we have
dc/cds/s
=
��f (k) + (1� s) α
1� αf (k)s
�s
(1� s)f (k)= � s
1� s +α
1� α (35)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 17 / 32
-
E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
The golden rule: The golden rule is the best S-S where S-Sconsumption is maximized. Since S-S consumption depends on thesaving rate, we can nd the golden rule rate of saving such that S-Sconsumption is maximized:
dcds= 0 (36)
ors = α (37)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 18 / 32
-
Growth E¤ects of Saving rate (continued)
Growth E¤ect:k̇ = sf (k)� (g + n+ δ)k (38)
dk̇ds
= f (k) + sf 0(k)dkds� (g + n+ δ)dk
ds
= f (k) + [f 0(k)k � (g + n+ δ)ks
]dkdssk
= f (k) + (f 0(k)k � f (k)) 11� α
= f (k) + f (k)α� 11� α
= 0 (39)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 19 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics
Algebraic analysis:
k̇t = sf (kt )� (g + n+ δ)kt' (sf 0(k̄)� (g + n+ δ))(kt � k̄) (40)
since sf 0(k̄) = sf 0(k̄) k̄f̄f̄k̄ = α
s f̄k̄ = α(g + n+ δ), we have
k̇t ' �(1� α)(g + n+ δ)(kt � k̄) (41)� �λ(kt � k̄)
this says that near S-S, the growth rate is approximately constant andequal to �λ. Hence λ = (1� α)(g + n+ δ) is called the speed ofconvergence.solving this equation implies
ln(kt � k̄) + const = �λt (42)notice that k0 is given so we have
ln(k0 � k̄) + const = 0 (43)hence
ln(kt � k̄) = ln(k0 � k̄)� λt (44)or
kt � k̄ = (k0 � k̄)e�λt (45)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 20 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics
solving this equation implies
ln(kt � k̄) + const = �λt (46)
notice that k0 is given so we have
ln(k0 � k̄) + const = 0 (47)
henceln(kt � k̄) = ln(k0 � k̄)� λt (48)
orkt � k̄ = (k0 � k̄)e�λt (49)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 21 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics (continued)
Now consider a small change of s on kt
dktds
=dk̄ds(1� e�λt ) � 0 (50)
which is zero at t = 0 and increases in a diminishing manner towardsd k̄ds with t.
growth e¤ect on k̇t , by k̇t = �λ(kt � k̄) we have
dk̇tds
' �λ(dktds� dk̄ds) (51)
� λe�λt dk̄ds
which is positive at t = 0 and decreases exponentially towards zerowith t.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 22 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics (continued)
The e¤ect on outputyt = f (kt )
henceyt ' f (k̄) + f 0(k̄)(kt � k̄) (52)
so we have
ẏt ' f 0(k̄)k̇t� �λf 0(k̄)(kt � k̄)' �λ(yt � ȳ) (53)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 23 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics (continued)
Since we haveẏt ' �λ(yt � ȳ) (54)
so we can solveyt � ȳ = (y0 � ȳ)e�λt . (55)
so we havedytds
= (1� e�λt )dȳds, (56)
which is similar to the analysis to capital.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 24 / 32
-
Transitional Dynamics (continued)
The e¤ect on consumption
ct = yt � (g + n+ δ)kt � k̇t (57)
so we have
dctds
=dytds� (g + n+ δ)dkt
ds� dk̇tds
= (1� e�λt )dȳds� (g + n+ δ)dk̄
ds(1� e�λt )� λe�λt dk̄
ds(58)
which is always negative at t = 0.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 25 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
rms: Suppose there is a continuum of rms measured by i 2 [0, 1].Its production function is
y(i) = ε(i)min [k(i),An(i)] (59)
the total output is
Y =Z 10y(i)di (60)
Where k(i) is the capital used by rm i and n(i) is the labor input insuch a rm, the aggregate technology level is A.
rm specic technology level ε(i) drawn from a common distributionfunction. Pr [ε(i) � ε] = ε�σ with the density function equal tof (ε) = σε�σ�1.
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 26 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
timing : Before the realization of ε(i), rm needs to install capital.After that ε(i) realizes, and rm i decides whether to produce or not.
Let r be the interest rate, and w be the real wage and the goodsprice be unit, the rms problem can be solved by backwardreduction. First consider the labor decision, its prot is
π(ε(i)) = ε(i)An(i)� wn(i) (61)
s.t An(i) � k(i) (62)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 27 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
In this case, the labor decision and output is
n(i) =
(k (i )A if ε(i) �
wA
0 otherwise
)(63)
y(i) =�
ε(i)k(i) if ε(i) � wA0 otherwise
�(64)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 28 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
The rms prot is
π(i) =
(ε(i)k(i)� k (i )A w if ε(i) �
wA
0 otherwise
)(65)
Hence its expected prot when its install capital is :
�rk(i) + k(i)∞ZwA
�ε� w
A
�f (ε)dε
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 29 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
This implies
r =
∞ZwA
�ε� w
A
�f (ε)dε
=
∞ZwA
εf (ε)dε��wA
�1�σ=
1σ� 1
�wA
�1�σ(66)
and the total production:
Y = K
∞ZwA
εf (ε)dε =σ
σ� 1�wA
�1�σK (67)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 30 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
Interest rate isrK =
1σY (68)
and the real wage is �wA
�1�σ=
σ� 1σ
YK
the total wage payment
wN = wKA
Z ∞wA
f (ε)dε = K�wA
�σ�1(69)
or we have :
wN =σ� 1
σY (70)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 31 / 32
-
A micro-foundation of aggregate production function
Finally use w = A�
σ�1σ
YK
� 11�σ to compute the aggregate ouput. we
have
A�
σ� 1σ
YK
� 11�σN =
σ� 1σ
Y (71)
or we have
ANK1
σ�1σ� 1
σ
σ1�σ= Y
σσ�1 (72)
This yields
Y =σ
σ� 1K1σ [AN ]
σ�1σ (73)
pfwang (Institute) Notes on the Solow Model 03/09 32 / 32
Solow-ModelIntroduction
The micro-foundation of Aggregate production function