npp construction activities - international atomic energy ... · pdf fileiaea international...
TRANSCRIPT
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
NPP Construction Activities
March 2013
John Moore
Nuclear Power Division
IAEA
Overview of Current Status
2
437 In operation
373 GWe total net installed capacity
67 Under construction
PRIS Data March 15, 2013
IAEA Reference: IAEA-PRIS
NPP Construction Data
IAEA Reference: IAEA-PRIS
Construction Starts
North America
IAEA Reference: IAEA-PRIS
History of NPP construction
North America
IAEA Reference: IAEA-PRIS
Full history of NPP construction
North America
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
First Nuclear Power Plant
IAEA
Budget Distribution in NPP Construction
Construction 24%
Procurement 30% Design & Licensing
6%
Interest 13%
CPI Increase 12%
Fuel 4%
Others 11%
DIRECT COSTS
(60%) INDIRECT COSTS
(40%)
TOTAL COST: Approx. 5 B$
IAEA Power Plant Engineering Page
9
Manpower and Duration
• Manpower : 4000/day, more than 80 Months
• Preparation : 40% and Implementation : 60%
IAEA
Material & Cost
• Rebar = 76,070 T
• Cable = about 4,000 km
• Instrumentation : 22500 devices
• Large bore piping = 120 km
• Cost : 5 Billion
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
Optimizing Construction Duration
IAEA
Average Duration for Past NPP Construction 1969 to
1977 in USA
Since 1972,
rapidly
increase
construction
period
Why ??
IAEA
Construction Time Span
Categories 1970-1995
[month]
1996-Now
[month]
1970-1995
[year]
1996-Now
[year]
Median 80 83 6.67 6.92
Minimum 41 47 3.42 4.08
1 Quartile 67 61 5.58 5.08
3 Quartile 105.5 176 8.79 14.67
Maximum 283 302 23.58 25.17
Resource : Power Reactor Information System in the IAEA database
IAEA
Shortest Construction Period
• Construction Schedule for 1350 MWe unit
• From F/C to C/O : 62 49 Months
• Construction Schedule at 1000 MWe unit
• From F/C to C/O : 64 47 Months
• C/O: Commercial Operation
• F/C : First concrete pouring
IAEA
Construction Schedule for Gen III+ NPPs
Site preparation : 12~18 M
Construction : 36~42 M
Start-up : 6~ 7 M
Total : 60 M
IAEA
Considerations Related to Schedule
Assumptions • Fundamental Project
Assumptions • First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) or Nth
of a Kind (NOAK)
• Labour Resource Availability
• Cash Flow
• Labour Shift Structure
• Reference Location
• Labour Agreements
•Site-Specific Assumptions • Site Conditions
• Seismic Requirements
• Accessibility/Transportation
• Engineering & Procurement Assumptions • Engineering
• Procurement Relationships and Contracts
• Long-Lead Components
• Manufacturing Durations
• Construction Assumptions • Extent of Modular Approach
• Specialized Equipment
• Shift of Work Load
• Licensing and Permitting Assumptions • Licensing Environment
• Changes in the Licensing Process
IAEA
Needed Manpower for Construction
Personnel Description
Peak Personnel Average
Single Plant
Craft Labor 1600
Craft Supervision 80
Site Indirect Labor 160
Quality Control Inspectors
40
NSSS Vendor and Subcontractor Staffs
140
EPC Contractor's Managers, Engineers, and Schedulers
100
Owner's O&M Staff 200
Start-Up Personnel 60
Licensing Inspectors 20
Total 2400
Craft Description Craft
Percent (%)
Peak Personnel Average
Single Unit
Boilermakers 4 60
Carpenters 10 160
Electricians/I&C 18 290
Iron Workers 18 290
Insulators 2 30
Labourers 10 160
Masons 2 30
Millwrights 3 50
Operating Engineers
8 130
Painters 2 30
Pipefitters 17 270
Sheet metal Workers
3 50
Teamsters 3 50
Total Construction Labor
100 % 1600 * Ref : DOE NP2010 Construction Schedule Evaluation, DE-AT01-020NE23476
IAEA
USA NPP Construction Experience
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
St.L
ucie 2
Pal
o Ver
de 1
Gra
nd Gulf
1
Wolf
Cre
ek 1
Sea
brook
1
Susq
uehhan
na
Sum
mer
1
Byro
n 1
San
Onofr
e 2
Wate
rford
3
LaSal
le
Com
anch
e Pea
k 1
Per
ry 1
McG
uire
Shore
ham 1
Mid
land 2
Cata
wba 1
Watts
Bar 1
Harr
is 1
Wash
ingto
n Nucle
ar 2
Enric
o Fer
mi 2
Limer
ick 1
IAEA
Watts Bar Unit 2 – Delayed NPP, USA
• Finished the partially completed Unit 2.(PWR,
1100 Mwe)
• Unit 2 was about 80% complete, stopped in 1988. • Decrease in demand for electricity.
• Construction resumed on October 15, 2007, with the reactor expected
to begin operation in Oct. 2012(60 M)
• The project is expected to cost $2.5 billion USD
IAEA
USA Nuclear Industry
• Delayed Construction
• Watts Bar 2 - line in December 2015, with major budget
overrun possibly to $4.5 billion)
• Site preparation (Vogtle 3 & 4 and Summer 2 & 3
units – AP1000 reactor) : First nuclear concrete pour at
Vogtle-3 delayed by three months due to rebar – yield strength.
• Following a 30-year period in which few new
reactors were built, it is expected that 4-6 new
units may come on line by 2020.
• However, lower gas (shale gas) prices since 2009
have put the economic viability of some of these
projects in doubt.
IAEA
KEDO 1&2 (North Korea)
Bataan NPP (Philippines)
Westinghouse 2 Loop 600MWe
95% completed.
Cancelled following
government change.
Started but never
completed (international
partners pulled out).
IAEA
Cernavoda NPP, Romania Right: Unit 1 /2 (in operation) Left: Unit 3, 4 and 5 (in preservation)
IAEA Atucah II NPP (Argentina)
Installation of Moderator Tank, June 2009
IAEA 4/2/2013 24
Angra 3 NPP, Brazil
IAEA
Olkiluoto 3 at the end of April 2009
Source: TVO
Core thermal power
Net power output
Net efficiency
4300 MWth
1577 MWel
37 %
May 2005 : First Concrete for Reactor Building
May 2007 : RPV installed,
May 2008 : Start Hot Functional Tests
Aug. 2008 : First Fuel Loading
Nov. 2008 : First Criticality
April 2009 : Start Demo-Run
OL3 construction site in February
2012
IAEA
December 2012, Areva
estimated full cost would be
about €8.5 billion, well over
previous estimate of €6.4
billion , with commercial
operation no earlier than 2015.
TVO and Areva are both
seeking compensation from
each other through the
International Court of
Arbitration.
IAEA
Major Concrete Dismantling and Demolishing
Project in Belene - Site Preparation
•Dismantling and Demolishing
•Reinforced Concrete 150 298 m3
•Steel Structures 8 760 t
•Excavation works 150 923 m3
•Planned Duration 18 months • Mobilization 2 months
• D&D 14 months
• Demobilization 2 months
IAEA
… and 10 months
after …
Site opening on
31.07.2008
Major Concrete Dismantling and Demolishing
Project in Belene - Site Preparation
IAEA
Watts Bar Unit 2 – Delayed NPP
• Completed
partially Unit 2.
(PWR, 1100 Mwe)
• Unit 2 was about
80% completed,
stopped in 1988.
• Resumed on
October 15, 2007,
• Operation in Oct.
2012(60 M)
• $2.5 billion USD
IAEA
Watts Bar Cost/Schedule Overruns
• Need additional $1.5 B to $2 B(2.5B $4~ 4.5 B$)
• Completion : Dec 2015 (Total : 60 M 99M)
• EPC : Bechtel
• Root causes: • Leadership - Organization and management capabilities misaligned
with unique project characteristics
• Estimate - Lack of rigorous understanding of work to be done led to
low initial estimates and impeded planning
• Execution - Management did not execute a robust execution plan or
fully utilize available capabilities
• Oversight - Inadequate oversight and project assurance
IAEA
Causes of Project Failure
• Planning • Lack of clearly defined project goal
& objectives at the beginning
• Done with insufficient data
• Change • Cost increase & Schedule
modification
• Cost of executing a project changes exponentially with time
• Many changes late in the project can kill the project
• Scope change during the project
• Scheduling • Too short a time frame • Overly optimistic deadlines
• Management Support • Lack of support and involvement
of top management
• Funding • Retracting funds during project
• Kiss of death to the project
• Cost Escalation • Project cost escalation beyond
initial estimates
• Resources
• Insufficient human resources - slows project down and burns out personnel
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
How can reduce construction
duration ?
IAEA
Site Construction
Management
support system
Modularization
with very large
crane
On-site
Work reduction)
Site Support
work efficiency
Open-top
&
parallel
construction
Work Leveling
(Peak Reduction)
Early and
Detailed
engineering
before on-site
work
Work
Efficiency
Strategies to Shorten Construction period
With Modularization Method
Construction Period = 38M (actual First ABWR)
Milestones S/C R/I M/C O/C P/S RPV H/T F/L C/O F/C
IAEA
40
100
’ 80 ’ 85 ’ 90 ’ 95 ’ 00 ’ 05
100
60
80
40
現地工数(出
力比
) (2
F -
1
=1
00
)
燃料装荷年度
Manhour Reduction with Early Engineering
Past
Design Start
Detailed engineering completed before construction start
Construction Start CO
Design/Engineering
Construction
Reduced Site Manpower to 40%
Man
ho
ur
‘80 ‘90 ‘00 ‘85 ‘95 ‘05
Current
Design Start Design Freeze
Design/Engineering
Construction
Early finish of Engineering
IAEA
Front-Loaded Construction Engineering
Basic Design
Detailed Design
Construction
Construction Engineering
Previous Design Process
Front-Loaded Construction Engineering
Basic Design
Detailed Design
Construction
Construction Engineering
Requirements from Construction Engineering Inputs from Plant Design
(BOQ, Composite Design, etc.)
Source : From Hitachi construction experiences
IAEA
建設工程
3D-model linked with Schedule
Construction Schedule with 6D
IAEA
Construction Schedule with 6D
3D-model by construction area
Quantities based
on 3D-model
Assign Labor
resource
Schedule loaded with Quantities and Resource
3D-model + Quantities + Resource + Time = 6D Database
• Develop detailed and precise Construction schedule by construction area based on Quantities and Labor resource
• Simulate the schedule with 3D-model
IAEA
RPV
Upper Condenser Module RCCV Lower Liner Module
Lower Condensor Unit RPV Pedestal Module Base Mat Module HPU Module
Stator Upper Drywell Module RCCV Top Slab
(420 ton)
(410 ton) (460 ton) (260 ton)
630 ton) (270 ton)
(650 ton) (900 ton) (550 ton)
(270 ton)
On-site Work Reduction - Modularization Method -
IAEA
Sep 27, 2010 Unit 1 CA01 lifting.
IAEA
Man P
ow
er
Construction Progress
(month)
Level-off
Manpower Peak
Based on previous ABWR (Conventional Method) (a
rb.)
Manpower Peak Reduction Effort
- Construction & Module Experience-
4
3
2
1
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 (month)
Manpower Distribution
Based on Latest ABWR
IAEA
Advanced Welding Techniques
• Quality welding is crucial and time consuming
• Advanced Techniques • Metal Arc Welding,
• Gas Tungsten Arc Welding
• Submerged Arc Welding
• Automatic welding equipment is very effective • Maintaining high quality
• Improving the working environment in narrow spaces.
IAEA
Automatic Welding Machine
Automatic Welding Machine for RCCV Liner
Automatic Welding for Large Bore Piping
Automatic Welding for Small Bore Piping (CRD piping)
IAEA
Four Season Construction
• Provides “Factory-like” environment for
construction during winter
• Secures environment for:
• Welding
• Concrete pouring & curing
• Protection from equipment
• Allows around the clock work
IAEA
Improvement of Work Productivity
during winter
Buildings with the All-Weather Structure (Steel and Temporary cover)
Four Season Construction
Movable Temporary Roof
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
冬期稼働率[%]
個別養生耐候工法 全天候耐候工法
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
Lessons Learned
IAEA
Lessons Learned (Project Management)
• Circumstances in Europe and the USA are quite different from 1970’s • India, Japan and Korea seem to be different due to continuous
NPP construction.
• Safety requirements clearly should be understood to avoid surprises. • Understanding of regulatory practices is essential
• Vendors and sub-contractors have lost knowledge and skill • New type of competence is needed for new technologies.
• New advanced safety features are not easily implemented
• New sub-contractor networks from companies with proven skills
IAEA
Lessons Learned (Project Management)
• Do not underestimate the importance of proven experience • Organization of construction site organization,
• Resource requirements and timing,
• Sub-contractor location and management
• Competence of manufacturers and sub-contractors is not easy to judge solely through auditing
• Owner management of construction activities
IAEA
• Ensure before starting implementation. • Licensee’s capabilities
and resources
• Vendor’s capabilities and resources
• Design has been done to a detailed level (i.e. design is complete!),
• Qualified subcontractors are available
Past
Design Start
Construction Start CO
Design/Engineering
Construction
Current
Design Start Design Freeze
Design/Engineering
Construction
Early finish of Engineering
Lessons Learned (Design)
• Challenges from design changes
• Design standards and Material Substitution Management
• Localization and technical transfer
IAEA
Lessons Learned (Design)
• Inadequate completion of design and engineering work prior to start of construction
• Delays start of construction activities at full speed
• Causes continuous pressures to all organizations
• Leads to attempts to reschedule manufacturing and construction steps,
• Leads to reduced quality due to time pressures
IAEA
Lessons Learned (Design)
• Inconsistency and different locations for designers • Different organisations in different places or even in
different countries
• Vendor’s standards versus international or imported country standards
• Metric system and British units
IAEA
Lessons Learned (Modularization)
• Difficulties during module
fabrication
• Procurement (Fabrication)
• Welding technology
• Challenges with modular
construction
• Assembling technology
• Lifting deformation control
• Transportation plans
• Installing, measuring and
positioning technology
Biggest module : Size: 21×14×21M
Weight: 850T
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
Exciting Times!
IAEA
Barakah-Unit 1, UAE
• The United Arab Emirates is the first country to start the construction
of its first nuclear power plant in 27 years, since construction was
started on China's first plant in 1985.
July 20 2012
Concrete
pouring
after approval
of PSAR
IAEA
Sanmen, China
Jan 29, 2013
AP-1000
Containment
vessel top head
placement;
Sanmen, China
IAEA
VC Summer Unit 2, USA
March 10/11, 2013
First concrete pour
of a new NPP in
North America in
three decades.
• Expected to be closely followed by concrete pour
at Vogtle Unit 2
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
IAEA Products and Services
IAEA
IAEA
IAEA REVIEW SERVICES
59
Milestone 1 Milestone 2
NPP site
review
mission
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
INIR
mission
Milestone 3
INIR
mission
NPP construction
review mission
Pre-
OSART
mission
SCART
mission
EPREV
mission
ISSAS
mission
IPPAS
mission
INSSERV
mission
IAEA
Construction Readiness Review Guidelines
• Performed at Two stages
• Before starting first concrete pour – check of preparations
• After hot function test, before initial fuel loading
• Areas Reviewed: • Project Management
• Engineering Readiness
• Procurement / Material / Supply Chain Readiness
• Quality Management and Records
• Human Resources and Training
• Construction Readiness
• Construction Installation Completion Assurance
• Targeted Reviews (as requested by customer)
• Guidelines to be finalized April 2013. Service available
now.
IAEA 61
NPP Owner/Operator Establishment
Decision
to go
nuclear
Contract signed
Pre-bidding Bidding and evaluation
Negotiations
Financial infra.
Promotion of national participation
Educational infrastructure
Insurance infra.
Legal infra.
OWNER ESTABLISHED
Regulatory body
COD
Site develop-ment
Construction
Erection
Start of construction
First reinforced concrete
Start of constr’n of RB interior
End of containment pressure test
End of primary loop pressure test
Start of first hot trial run
First criticality
Start of trial operation
Handover
Year -1 -3 -4 -5 -6 -2 1 3 4 5 6 2 0
Planning Project Implementation (Pre-project) Project Implementation (Execution)
Commissioning
Stage 1
Construction
Preparation.
Stage 2
Construction
Execution.
IAEA
Construction e-Learning Module
• Part of a series of modules targeted at newcomer
countries, at both senior leader and project team
member levels.
• Topics covered in the Construction Module:
• What makes nuclear construction unique
• Important considerations for projects and programmes
• How to achieve excellence
• Key site considerations
• Will be available by end of
Q2 2013.
IAEA
Thank you for your attention!