nrcs ecological site handbook webinar april 16, 2013
DESCRIPTION
NRCS Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 16, 2013. Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center and George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support Center. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NRCS Ecological SiteHandbook
WebinarApril 16, 2013
Susan Andrews, National LeaderSoil Quality and Ecosystems Branch
National Soil Survey Centerand
George Peacock, Team LeaderNational Grazing Lands Team
Central National Technology Support Center
Acceleration of Ecological Site Descriptions
(ESD’s)• Chief Dave White approved a Decision Memo in Nov
2009• Decision made that the Agency would
“Accelerate ESD Development”
• A National Bulletin - signed by Deputy Chiefs for: • Soil Science & Resource Assessment (SSRA)
and Science & Technology (S&T)• S&T to lead Implementation; Interpretations • SSRA to lead Inventory; QA-QC; Standards development
ESD Standards Purpose:PURPOSE: Provide standards, guidelines, definitions, policy, responsibilities, and procedures for conducting the collaborative process of ESD development.
Interdisciplinary Interagency Non-governmental organizations Universities Other partners
NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook
(NESH)Developed cooperatively between Soil Science and Resource Assessment (SSRA) and Science and Technology (S&T) Deputy Areas
National Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch
National Grazing Lands Team National Technology Support Centers State Staffs Soil Survey Regional Offices Other SSRA and S&T Staff
NESH Primary Benefits:
To improve:• Consistency
• Throughout the US
• On “All lands”• Quality
• QC/QA• Correlation
Major Sections of the NESH
Section I – Policy and Procedures
Section II – ES Concept and Description Development
Section III – Delineation and Mapping, Hierarchies, and Other Vegetation Classification and Stratification Schemes
Glossary
References
Webinar OverviewBrief overview of draft NESH: Released - National
Bulletin 190-13-9 Section 1 –
Policy and Procedures Comments due by
May 15th to [email protected] or [email protected]
NESH Section I Contents
Section I – Policy and Procedures Part 100 – IntroductionPart 200 - Project ManagementPart 202 – (Reserved) Committees, Work
Agreements and MeetingsPart 203 – (Reserved) Working with PartnersPart 300 – ESD Quality Control, Quality
Assurance, Correlation and CertificationPart 301 – (Reserved) Job Certification for
Ecological Site Quality Control (Tabled, pending further review)
Section I, Part 100: Introduction
Part 100 – Introduction Part 100.00 – PurposePart 100.01 – Definition
An ecological site is a conceptual division of the landscape, defined as “a distinctive kind of land based on recurring soil, landform, geological, and climate characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce distinctive kinds and amounts of vegetation and in its ability to respond similarly to management actions and natural disturbances”.
Section I, Part 100.02: References
Part 100 – Introduction Part 100.02 – Principle References and Their
MaintenanceWill replace much of the information currently contained in the following NRCS manuals and handbooks
National Biology Manual National Forestry Manual National Forestry Handbook National Range and Pasture Handbook National Soil Survey Manual National Soil Survey Handbook
Section I, Part 100.03: Roles and Responsibilities
Part 100 – Introduction Part 100.03 – Roles and Responsibilities
Defines NRCS staff general roles and responsibilities in ESD development
From field office and soil survey office to National Headquarters
Section I, Part 100.04: Progress Reporting
Part 100 – Introduction Part 100.04 – Progress Reporting
• Milestones (defined in Exhibit 100-1)
• Levels of Completion Provisional Ecological Site Approved ESD Correlated ESD
Provisional Ecological Sites
Provisional Ecological Site Established after:
Initial ES concept is developed, and Initial state-and-transition model is
drafted Following quality control and quality
assurance review of ES concept, ES name and number entered into database
Essentially a placeholder for a future ESD
Approved Ecological Site Description
Approved ESD Must contain minimum set of information (Exhibit
100-2)Meets required information in Interagency
Ecological Site Handbook for Rangelands – Section 5.0, if rangeland
Requirement for release as ‘Approved’ or interim ESD: Must have quality control review and at
least one quality assurance review Signed by Soil Survey Regional Director Certified by State Conservationists and
partners Exhibit 300-6 – Approved ESD Certification
sheet
Available for public release but NOT considered a complete ESD
Correlated Ecological Site Description
Correlated ESD Must contain minimum set of information as
identified in Exhibit 100-3.Exceeds required information identified in
Interagency Ecological Site Handbook for Rangelands – Section 5.0.
Requirement for release as ‘Certified’: Must have quality control review and final
quality assurance review and correlation conference
Final correlation signed by SS Regional Director Certified by State Conservationists and partners Exhibit 300-8 – Correlated ESD Certification
sheet
Section 100, Part 100.05Performance Measures
Part 100.05 – Correlated ESD Performance MeasuresAcres – reported for a correlated ESD will
include all acres of soil map unit components correlated to the ecological site. New, correlated ESDs – acreage equal to the
areal extent of the site. Updated ESDs – receive partial acreage credit
dependent upon the amount of work required. Credit will be proposed by the technical team and determined by consensus of the management team.Reserved and to be piloted: A complexity measure that will serve
to modify acreage amounts; also considering potential PRS report
NESH Section I, Part 200
Part 200 – Project Management Part 200.00 – PurposePart 200.01 – Roles and Responsibilities
Board of Advisors Management Team Technical Team
Section I, Part 200.01Roles and Responsibilities
Section I, Part 200.02-200.05
Part 200 – Project Management Part 200.02 – Workload Planning
Long Range Plan Project Plan Annual Plan of Operations
Part 200.03 – Project Plan Development (Exhibit 200-1)
Part 200.04 – Prioritizing Project PlansPart 200.05 – Project Plan Approvals
Project Planning Overview
Section I, Part 200.06 Revisions and Updates
Revision – minor changesThe state technical discipline specialist obtains approval of the Management Team by working with State Resource Conservationist to coordinate edits and submit the revised ESD through the correlation process.
Update – significant changesThe state technical discipline specialist brings the information to the attention of the Technical Team. Technical Team will plan a project in accordance with guidance in Part 200 of handbook.
Since the ESD is in the FOTG, any new information should be brought to the attention of appropriate state technical discipline specialist.
NESH Section I, Part 300Part 300 – ESD Quality Control, Quality Assurance, Correlation and Certification
Part 300.00 – PurposePart 300.01 – DefinitionsPart 300.02 – Quality ControlPart 300.03 – Quality AssurancePart 300.04 – Interim Release of ESDs
(Approved ESDs)Part 300.05 – Final Correlation of ESDs Part 300.06 – Certification of ESDs
Section I, Part 300.00Confusion over definition(s) of correlation Two types of correlation in the NESH:
Relationship - establishes the relationship between soil components and ESs
Process - requires that data entered into the soil and ES database(s) meets standards to ensure each ES is distinguished from all others and that proper interpretations are assigned to each ESD
Diagram of Steps, Part 300.02-300.05
Section I, Part 300.07: Currently Approved,
Meeting Previous Standards
Part 300.07 – Currently Approved, Meeting Previous StandardsCurrently approved ESDs that meet guidance in the National Range and Pasture Handbook (December 2003) or the National Forestry Manual (September 2010) may remain as approved documents in ESIS database.
Section I, Part 300.08: De-Activation of ESDs
Part 300.08 – De-activation of ESDsMemorandum sent to all state and field offices with supporting reasons for de-activation. Must allow 45 days for filing objections.SSRO deactivates after the 45-day waiting period and all efforts for mitigation of issues are exhausted.
SummaryToday’s webinar gave an overview of Section I – Policy and ProceduresWebinar – April 18th - will review Section II – ES Concept and Description Development
Comments are due May 15th on both Sections
Send comments or suggestions to Susan Andrews and/or George Peacock at:
[email protected]@ftw.usda.gov