nuclear magnetic resonance in the condon domain state

4
PhysicsLettersAl60(1991)315—318 PHYSICS LETTERS A North-Holland Nuclear magnetic resonance in the Condon domain state A. Gordon’ Max-Planck Inst itUt für Festkorperforschung, W-7000 Stuttgart 80, Germany B. Grushko Inst it Ut für Festkorperforschung, Forschungszentrum, Julich GmbH, Postfach 1913, W-51 70 Jülich, Germany I.D. Vagner Department ofPhysics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA and Solid State Institute, Technion Israel Institute ofTechnology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel and P. Wyder Max-Planck-Institutflk Festkorperforschung, Hochfeld—Magnetlabor, B.P. 166X, F-38042, Grenoble Cedex, France Received 30 September 1991; accepted for publication 9 October 1991 Communicated by J. Flouquet Calculations of splittings of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) lines at diamagnetic phase transitions are carried Out for a three-dimensional electron gas. There is a good agreement between the theory and the experimental results in silver. The size of the Condon domains and the width of the domain walls are estimated. Experimental results on the de Haas—van Alphen effect in silver are analyzed with the help of the temperature—magnetic-field diagram. The results of the analysis are in agreement with the NMR data. The NMR splitting in a two-dimensional electron gas due to Condon domains is calculated. As is known, normal metals under the condition netic interaction between electrons which becomes of the strong de Haas—van Alphen (dHvA) effect important when the dHvA effect is strong enough to may undergo a diamagnetic phase transition to a make the internal field in the sample significantly Condon-domain state [1,2]. Therefore there can ex- different from the applied field [41. The difference ist for each dHvA cycle a region of applied magnetic- between these two fields becomes significant only field strength in which no portion of the field-in- when the amplitude of the magnetization oscilla- duction isotherm is thermodynamically stable [3]. tions is compared with their period. The internal field Then the sample is divided into regions with differ- responsible for determining the energy levels inside ent values of the magnetization and a domain struc- the sample is the macroscopic magnetic induction, ture results. These domains are regions in which the B. The existence of magnetic domains in silver was magnetization is uniform; in the domain walls the proved by Condon and Walstedt [2]. The appear- magnetization changes smoothly from its value in one ance of domains in silver plate was demonstrated by domain to its value in the neighbouring domain. The the simultaneous occurrence of two nuclear mag- reason of the existence of Condon domains is a mag- netic resonance (NMR) frequencies over just the appropriate part of the dHvA cycle, while only a sin- Permanent address: Department of Mathematics and Physics, gle NMR frequency was observed over the part of Oranim, Haifa University, 36910 Tivon, Israel. the cycle without domains. The very existence of two 0375-9601/91/s 03.50 © 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers BY. All rights reserved. 315

Upload: a-gordon

Post on 21-Jun-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nuclear magnetic resonance in the Condon domain state

PhysicsLettersAl60(1991)315—318 PHYSICSLETTERS ANorth-Holland

Nuclearmagneticresonancein the Condondomainstate

A. Gordon’Max-PlanckInst itUt für Festkorperforschung,W-7000Stuttgart80, Germany

B. GrushkoInstit Ut fürFestkorperforschung,Forschungszentrum,Julich GmbH,Postfach 1913, W-5170 Jülich, Germany

I.D. VagnerDepartmentofPhysicsandAstronomy,TheJohnsHopkinsUniversity,Baltimore, MD 21218,USAandSolidStateInstitute,Technion— IsraelInstituteofTechnology,TechnionCity, Haifa 32000,Israel

and

P. WyderMax-Planck-InstitutflkFestkorperforschung,Hochfeld—Magnetlabor,B.P.166X,F-38042,GrenobleCedex,France

Received30 September1991; acceptedfor publication9 October1991Communicatedby J. Flouquet

Calculationsof splittingsof nuclearmagneticresonance(NMR) lines atdiamagneticphasetransitionsarecarriedOut for athree-dimensionalelectrongas.Thereis a good agreementbetweenthetheoryandtheexperimentalresultsin silver.ThesizeoftheCondondomainsandthewidth of thedomainwalls areestimated.Experimentalresultson thedeHaas—vanAlpheneffectinsilverareanalyzedwith thehelpof thetemperature—magnetic-fielddiagram.Theresultsoftheanalysisarein agreementwith theNMR data.TheNMR splitting in atwo-dimensionalelectrongasdueto Condondomainsis calculated.

As is known, normal metalsunderthe condition netic interactionbetweenelectronswhich becomesof the strongde Haas—vanAlphen (dHvA) effect importantwhenthedHvA effectis strongenoughtomay undergoa diamagneticphasetransition to a make the internal field in the samplesignificantlyCondon-domainstate [1,2]. Thereforetherecanex- different from the appliedfield [41.The differenceist foreachdHvA cycle aregionof appliedmagnetic- betweenthesetwo fields becomessignificant onlyfield strengthin which no portion of the field-in- when the amplitude of the magnetizationoscilla-duction isothermis thermodynamicallystable [3]. tionsis comparedwith theirperiod.TheinternalfieldThenthesampleis divided into regionswith differ- responsiblefor determiningthe energylevels insideent valuesof the magnetizationanda domainstruc- the sampleis the macroscopicmagneticinduction,tureresults.Thesedomainsare regionsin which the B. Theexistenceof magneticdomainsin silver wasmagnetizationis uniform; in the domain walls the provedby Condonand Walstedt [2]. The appear-magnetizationchangessmoothlyfromitsvalueinone anceof domainsin silverplatewasdemonstratedbydomaintoits valuein theneighbouringdomain.The the simultaneousoccurrenceof two nuclearmag-reasonof theexistenceof Condondomainsisa mag- netic resonance(NMR) frequenciesover just the

appropriatepart ofthedHvA cycle,while only asin-Permanentaddress:DepartmentofMathematicsandPhysics, gle NMR frequencywasobservedover the part ofOranim,Haifa University,36910Tivon, Israel. thecyclewithout domains.Theveryexistenceoftwo

0375-9601/91/s03.50 © 1991 ElsevierSciencePublishersBY. All rights reserved. 315

Page 2: Nuclear magnetic resonance in the Condon domain state

Volume 160, number3 PHYSICSLETTERSA 18 November1991

well-separatedNMR linesof 109Ag indicatesthat the thermodynamicpoint of view, coexisting domainsdomain-wallwidth is much smallerthanthe domain representdifferent phasesof a metal with differentthickness, magneticinductions.The mostimportantcaseis that

Accordingto the analysisof the NMR datamade in which the characteristiclinear dimensionsof ain ref. [21, thereis only a qualitativeagreementbe- samplearelargecomparedwith the cyclotronradiustweenthe experimentandtheavailabletheoryof the r~so that the domainsized is considerablygreaterdHvA effect. TheseNMR experimentsshowed:(i) thanthethicknessof thedomainwall A. Sinced>> A,an existenceof two magneticdomains;(ii) the fact the domainwall may be regardedas planarandthethat theparameterconnectedbetweentheamplitude problemas one-dimensional[141. Wechoosethe xof the magneticoscillationsandthe periodof dHvA axis as perpendicularto the domain wall. A mm-oscillationsis larger thanunity in the domainstate. imization of the thermodynamicpotential (1), (2)

In spiteof the fact that in recentyears the dia- includingthegradientterm (DteO)givesthe knownmagneticphasetransitionshave been extensively result [6,8,14,151studied in the three-dimensionaland the two-di- — 2

B=±(a/b)” tanh(x/A), (5)mensionalelectrongas [5—11],calculationsof theNMR splitting havenot beencarriedout and the where thewidth of the domain wall A is givenbyquantitativerelationbetweenthe magneticdomains 4—2 D ‘a 1/2 6and the splitting of the NMR lines has not been — 1

established, for the following boundaryconditions,In this communicationwe explain the NMR ex- — . —

Fm B—+ ‘a’b”2 lim dB’dx—O ‘7periments[2] on the basisof the theory of the dia- ~ — — / / ‘ I —

magneticphasetransitions[12,7,11].Our thermodynamicpotentialis As a result of (4), thedifferencebetweenthevalues

of the magneticinductionin two differentdomains

~=~LKs(Bo)+ ~‘-~ + J~dv, (1) EtB is equaltoB

2—B1_—Ei.B=2(a/b)”2. (8)

where— — To calculate~.Bwe usethefollowing expressionsfor

~=~aB2+~bB4+D(VB)2, (2) coefficients a and b: ~a=(4~t~—1)/4it [15] and

whereweconsiderthespatiallyvaryingmagneticin-4b= (Ef/ilQ~Bo) [12], whereE~is the Fermi en-

ductionB as ergy,Q~is the cyclotronfrequency,x= ÔM/0B is the— maximal differential susceptibility,where M is the

B(r) —B0+B(r) , IB(r) I << I Bo I (3) magnetization.Accordingto ref. [3] 4m~=A,where

Herefl is the nonuniform part of the magneticin- A is a measureofthe magneticinteraction.ForA> Iductionwhich is small in comparisonwith the uni- the transition into the domainstateoccurs.form part B0. bLKS is the thermodynamicpotential Substitutingexpressionsfor aandb into (8) wefor thecaseof auniform magneticfield B0 calculated obtainby Lifshitz andKosevich [13], taking into account ~ l\1~~2hQ~B0the Shoenbergcorrection [4] replacingH by B. The ~ = ~ 2~ ) E, ‘ (9)coefficient b andthe coefficient D of the gradientterm are positive;D = ~r~[141; r~is the cyclotron Let us comparethe valueof i~s.Bcalculatedby (9)radius. with that determinedin the experimentin ref. [2].

A minimizationof the functional (1), (2) in the Theexperimentwascarriedoutin a plate-shapedsil-caseD=0 gives two domainswith magneticinduc- ver sampleorientedperpendicularto the magnetictions B1 andB2: field H of 90 kG with the [1001directionparallelto

B —B ‘b’~2 B —B + ‘b”2 (4\ the field. For this samplegeometrythe demagneti-— o— (a, / , 2— 0 (a, / “ / zationfactorn= 1 andthusB=H. TheFermienergy

while in the statewithoutdomainsB=B0. Fromthe for silver is Ef= 5.5 eV [4], the cyclotronfrequency

316

Page 3: Nuclear magnetic resonance in the Condon domain state

Volume 160, number3 PHYSICSLETTERSA 18 November1991

calculatedfor this field Q~=l.57x 1012 Hz. The val- 3ues A or x~dependingon the appliedfield, temper-ature and sample orientation for each material,shouldbe determinedin independentexperiments. ~ 2

period:~=H~/F and M0 is the magnetizationam- 1 -In thefollowing weshallfind theparameterA whichis equal to A=8it2M

0/Aff [3,4] (All is the dHvAplitude) is 3.3 for theseconditionsat T= 1.4K. Thenthecalculationaccordingto (9) givesAB= 10 0. Theexperimentalvaluefound by CondonandWalstedt 0 ‘ ‘ I

—it —2—1 01 2 itin silver [2] is close to this magnitude: AB=11 Gat 2it FT= 1.4 K (AB is the difference between the magneticinductionsin two domainscorrespondingto the ob- hservedfrequencydifferenceoverthe domainregion(see (9)). Theaccuracyof a determinationof the Fig. 1. Temperature—magnetic-fielddiagramfor onecycleof the

dHvA oscillation in thesilver sampleorientedwith the [100]magneticinductionB in ref. [2] is to within 0.5 0. directionparallelto themagneticfield of 90kG. Thediagramis

Theaboveresultcanbe illustratedby meansof the calculatedfor TD = 0.8K. HereH0 is thestrengthof themagnetic

magnetic-field—temperaturediagrambuilt on theba- field at thecentreof thedHvA cycleandh = H—H0 is thedevia-

sisof the Lifshitz—Kosevichformula.Neglectingthe tion fromthis value.

higherharmonicsin the first approximationwe canpresentthe Lifshitz—Kosevichformula [13] for the whereH0 is the strengthof the magneticfield at theamplitudeM0 of the magnetizationoscillationsat the centreof thedHvA cycle.Thush is themeasuredex-fundamentalfrequencyasfollows [4], ternalappliedmagneticfield. Thevertexofthecurve

QFGCTB”2RD in fig. 1 is at T=2.55 K (A=l). It is very closeto

M0 = sinh(aT/B) (10) the temperatureof the domain appearancein the

NMR measurements[2]: T=2.5 K. Fromthis dia-where T is the temperature,Q= (1/it) (2e/~/cit)1/2

gramwe candirectlyestimatea possibleNMR split-RD is the Dingle reductionfactor:

ting connectedwith thedomainexistence.At T= 1.4RD=exp(—aTD/B), (11) K we obtain AB=A110=l2.5 G, whereAll0 is the

field differencein two domains(n= 1), while thewhere TD is the Dingle temperatureand a= 1.469X 10

5(m”/m) G/K, m* is the effectivemassof the measuredsplitting AB=l 1 G. The slight differenceelectron,m is the electronmass,F is the frequency maybecausedby the fact that the demagnetization

factorn for therealplate-shapedsample(sizesoftheof themagnetizationoscillations,C is thecurvaturefactor of the Fermi surface,G is the spin splitting plateare 8 mmx 8 mmx0.8 mm) isnotequalto un-factor. ity but n=0.84 [4].

If aT/B is largeenoughfor sinh to bereplacedby We canestimatethe typical domainsize andthe~exp,we obtain domain-wall width. The domain size is found by

minimizing thesumof thefield andthedomain-wallM

0=(2FQCT/B”2) exp[—a(T+TD)/B] . (12) energies [16]: d=(Lr~/4it~—l)”2~37~.tm,where

If we use the following experimental data for silver L is the sample size (about8 mm in the experimentthen for belly oscillations, for B

0=H=90 kG (the [2]). This value is very close to that mentioned indemagnetizationfactorn = 1 fora plate),TD = 0.8K, ref. [2]: d~30 j.tm. Theestimateof thedomain-wallm*/m=0.936[17],F=4.77xl0SG[18],C=0.354 width gives 4=r~/(4it~—1)”

2~0.4jsm (for[19], G~1 [20], wehavethediagramfor the (100) r~=lx l0~cm [4]). Theratio d/Ashouldbeclosedirectionof theappliedmagneticfield shown in fig. to the ratio AB/r, where~ is the naturallinewidth1. The details of the diagramconstructionare de- of the resonance[2]. Since the linewidth is of thescribedin ref. [21]. In fig. 1 hisequalto h=H—H

0, orderof a tenth of a gausswe havevery close the-

317

Page 4: Nuclear magnetic resonance in the Condon domain state

Volume 160, number3 PHYSICSLETTERSA 18 November1991

oretical and experimental results:d/A 0.9 x 102 and Israel Foundationfor Scientific Researchand De-AB/a~lx102. velopment, Grant No. 0-112-279, 7/88. One of us

It was pointed out in ref. [5] that the magnetic (A.G.) is indebtedto the Minerva foundation forinteraction should be strikingly different in a two-di- the support.mensionalelectrongas. In particular,domainspinthe Fermilevel betweenLandaulevels — a conditionnecessaryfor the observationof the quantumHall Referenceseffect. Since,within eachdomain,the Landaulevelsare either empty or completelyfilled, the longitu- [1] J.H.Condon,Phys.Rev.45 (1966)526.

dinal resistancevanishes.In the two-dimensional [2] J.H.CondonandR.E.Walstedt,Phys.Rev.21(1968)612.

electron gas the magnetic-inductiondifferencebe- [3] A.B. Pippard,Proc. R. Soc. A 272 (1963) 192.tweentwo domainscorrespondingto the NMR-fre- [4] D.Shoenberg,Magneticoscillationsin metals(CambridgeUniv. Press,Cambridge,1984).quencysplitting canbe obtainedasfollows [5,8] [5] I.D. Vagner,T. ManivandE. Ehrenfreund,Phys.Rev.Lett.

till (2~T—T~I\h/2 hQCBO 51(1983)1700.(13) [6] R.S.Markiewicz, Phys.Rev.B 34(1986)4172,4177.— T U Ef [7] A. Gordon, I.D. Vagnerand P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. B 41

(1990)658.In this equationthe critical temperatureT~is equal [8] T.ManivandID. Yagner,Phys.Rev.B 41(1990)2661.

to [9] A. Gordon,I.D. VagnerandP.Wyder,Solid StateCommun.74 (1990)401.

T~= (hQC/4kB)(l —n~/n~), (14) [lOlA. Gordonandl.D.Vagner,J. Phys.C2 (1990) 3787.[111 A. Gordon,T.Salditt, I.D. VagnerandP. Wyder,Phys.Rev.

where n,, is thecriticalvalueandnf=Ef/hQC.Thelat- B 43 (1991) 3775.ter is determinedas follows, [12] S.C. Ying, B.J. McIntyre andJ.J. Quinn, Phys.Rev. B 6

(1970) 1801.n~=(m~~1/2mr

0)’’2, (15) [13]I.M. Lifshitz andA.M. Kosevich,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 29

wheremis the free-electronmass,r0=e

2/mc2 is the (1955) 730 [Soy.Phys.J~TP2(1956)636].[14] l.A. Privorotskii,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 52 (1967) 1755 [Soy.

classicalradiusof the electron,~ is the electron Phys.JETP25(l967)1167].

effectivemassreflectingthat the systemconsistsof [15] S.C.Ying andJ.J.Quinn, Phys.Rev.Lett. 22 (1969)231.

ananisotropicfree-electrongasin whichtheeasyaxes [161C. Kittel andJ.K.Gait,SolidStatePhys. 3 (1956)437.

(x, y) are perpendicularto a uniform static mag- [17]B. Lengeler, W.R. Wamper, R.R. Bourassa,K. Mika, K.WingerathandW. Uelhoff,Phys.Rev. B 15 (1977)5493.

neticfield H~,1 isthe distancebetweenneighbouring[18] A.S. Josephand A.C. Thorsen, Phys.Rev. 138 (1965)

planes. Aii59.

Eq. (13) showsthat the NMR splitting displays [19] W.M. Bibby, P.T. Coleridge,N.C. Cooper,C.M.M. Nex and

thecritical-temperaturedependenceof a square-root D. Shoenberg,J.Low Temp.Phys.34 (1979)681.type (I (T—T~)/ TI)”2 at the diamagneticphase [20] D. ShoenbergandJ. Yandercooy,J. Low Temp. Phys. 2

(1970)483.transition.

[21] B. Grushko,A. Gordon, ID. VagnerandP. Wyder,to bepublished.

This researchwas supportedby the German—

318