nuclear manager of epri technology transfer (nmett ...€¦ · technical program value. overall...

© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Steve ChengelisExecutive Director, Nuclear

August 29th, 2016

Nuclear Manager of EPRI Technology Transfer

(NMETT) Advisory Meeting

Date: August 10, 2016

2© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

AgendaMonday, August 29, 2016

Time Topic Lead

8:00 am Welcoming/Introductions/Meeting Overview K. Clemen, COG, S. Chengelis, EPRI

8:15 am Emergent Issues/Baffle Bolt N. Wilmshurst, EPRI, S. Brown, Entergy

9:00 am Value Statements A. Summe, EPRI, R. Ebright, AEP

9:30 am Break All

9:45 am EPRI Business Update S. Chengelis, EPRI

10:30 am Delivering the Nuclear Promise N. Wilmshurst, EPRI

10:45 am PMBD Support of DNP R. Way, EPRI

11:15 am Quality Management Program C. Haas, EPRI11:45 am TMC Update K. Clemen, COG

11:50 am Roundtable Discussion/Action Items S. Chengelis, EPRI

12:00 pm Closing Comments/Adjourn K. Clemen, COG


EPRI Business Update

Steve Chengelis, EPRI


Agenda

EPRI Membership UpdateOnline Pricing Update2016 Member Satisfaction SurveyEPRI Portfolio ChangesList Management


Depth of Our CollaborationU.S. PARTICIPANTS

>220 reactors

NON U.S. PARTICIPANTS

20 countries

GLOBAL BREADTH & DEPTH

>75%of the world’s commercial

nuclear units

All U.S. nuclear owners/operators

100 reactors

Funding and Membership Growth Continues – 2 new full members in 2016


Horizon Nuclear Power

EPRI Base Member Supplemental Participation

– FRP– BWRVIP– BWRVIA– BWR TSG– MAAP UG– ANT– IRT UG

Plans to develop 2 ABWRS at Wylfa Site


Kashiwazaki-Kariwa ①②③④⑤➏➐

Tomari ➊➋➌

Higashidori ➊

Onagawa ①➋③

Fukushima Daiichi➊➋➌➍➎➏

Fukushima Daini

①②③④

Tokai Daini ●Hamaoka ➌➍⑤

Ikata ①②➌

Sendai ➊➋

Shika ①➋

Tsuruga ➊➋

Mihama ➊➋➌

Ohi ①②➌➍

Genkai

➊②➌➍

● Restarted (as of 11/6/15)

● Restart Approved

● Applied for Restart Approval

○ Preparing for Application

● Under Decommissioning

Kyushu Electric Power Company EPRI Base Member Supplemental Participation

– MRP– NDE– NMAC– GOTHIC– MAAP UG– HRA UG

Station Name System Capacity MWe netStart Year

Genkai-2 PWR 529 1981Genkai-3 PWR 1127 1994Genkai-4 PWR 1127 1997Sendai-1 PWR 846 1984Sendai-2 PWR 846 1985


U.S. versus International

66% 63% 61% 59% 57%

34% 37% 39% 41% 43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ExpectedUS INTL


Online Pricing Update



Scope and Capabilities Allow members to make R&D selections online

– Access through Member Center (epri.com)

– Quote to Contract process streamlined with electronic feed to EPRI Systems

Goals

– Improve member experience…search, SPN, export to Excel

– Dynamic offering

Focus

– Supplemental

– NSPFA Selections

– EPRI Membership


On-line Pricing Portfolio Roadmap

Roll-out for 2016 Non-Nuclear Supplemental

Pilot Group: Supplemental

2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 Mar 2016

Full Roll-out

Test Environment Production Environment

Apr 2016

METT Group

May - Jun 2016

Pilot Group: Nuclear

Nuclear Allocation Sheet

Build for Full ARP rollout,

complex

Pilot ARP

2017

Full ARP

2018ARP

Collaborative Supplemental 2017 NSPFA

2018 Membership


Accessing Online Pricing PortfolioAccess Online Pricing

Website

BETA site access will

be removed; users access

through shopping

cart

https://pricingportfolio.epri.com/


Landing PageManage access for contacts (subMETTs, Advisors,

etc.) Create a new Order Review any saved or completed Order


Assigning Access RolesFilter contact list by AdvisorsCommittee list displays for each contactUse search box to filter Advisor list by key wordUpdate role for filtered view


Creating an OrderQualified

Metrics

ARP Summary

Selection TotalsSearch any Text

Check box to Order

Hyperlink downloads SPN

Capture Technical Contact

Allocate Funds


Selection Sheet Comparison2017 Excel

Nuclear Selection Sheet

2017 Online Nuclear

Selection Sheet


General Flow for Pricing Portfolio

Enter Pricing Portfolio portal

Manage Access

Landing Page

Create New Order

Update a Saved Order

Make selections

Portfolio Page

METT Reviews and Submits

Cart

M&TS Review and Release

Nuclear negotiator approves, contracting begins

Note: for New access, an overnight system refresh is needed for the shopping cart icon to appear


Browser PreferencePricing Portfolio is most compatible with

Chrome

Internet Explorer (IE) –Requires IE browser with a version

greater than 9 If you have epri.com in your

Compatibility View Settings you will need to remove it before accessing the applicationNote: CLM online contracting

requires compatibility mode turned on


New Changes in Production – My SettingsUsers can ‘Opt out’ from Notification emails

METTs can require receipt of all Action emails

This locks/pre-selects the METT in the selection box on checkout

(Restricted) Initiator role selects METT(s) to send Action email for approval


Next Steps

NMETTs submit Nuclear selections online or via spreadsheet– Update spreadsheet

input online (error checking, integration online)


Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity

© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

2016 Nuclear Sector Member Satisfaction


Member Satisfaction - Background EPRI has captured member satisfaction

feedback in various forms for many years

Current member satisfaction survey adopted by Board in 2006

Results reviewed regularly with Board– one of Corporate Performance Indices (CPIs)

Member feedback used to drive continuous improvement across EPRI

Helps prioritize efforts – focus on areas with greatest impact on

satisfaction


Nuclear Member Satisfaction Survey Results

Overall Performance

Ease of Doing Business

Technical Program Value

Overall Satisfaction

2015 Results

2010-2015 Trend

92.3%

Overall Performance

Ease of Doing Business

Technical Program Value

86.1%

93.2%

92.4%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

• Impact of research on improving my business

• The program's strategic priorities and directions

• Quality of research results

• Relevance of research carried out by the program

• Technical staff expertise

Top ranked aspects of EPRI Experience

Who completed the Survey


Category Initiative Timeframe

Research and Development

• Research Focus Areas• Project Overview Forms• Quality Management Program Implemented 2016

Tech Transfer

• Executive Summary• Onsite EPRI updates/regional meetings• International workshops• International NPC• Digital Strategy (ongoing)

Implemented 2016

Simplification• On-line Pricing• Invoice Review• New Pricing Model

Implemented 2016

Website • New Search Engine• Member Center Improvements Implemented 2016

Improvement Initiatives

Listening and Responding to the Feedback of our Members


Digital Delivery Enhancements

Becomes


Becomes

Digital Delivery Enhancements


New Search EngineThe search engine gets smarter over

time based on use.

It tracks what people search and where they go with the results.

The more the search engine is used, the faster it learns.

As it learns, features such as relevance and search term recognition will

dramatically improve, and as a result improve your search experience.

You make the search engine better by using it!


Executive Summary Update &

2017 Portfolio Changes

Brian SchimmollerResearch Portfolio Manager, Nuclear


Executive Summary Update

Objectives Quickly get results to right people Clearly call out key findings Facilitate knowledge transfer Identify related opportunities

Key Features Prescribed, consistent format Target audience defined Tied directly to source document

Status Implemented as of 8/1/2016 Required for technical reports Optional for other product types


2017 Portfolio

New pricing model in effect January 1, 2017– Full members will have access to 21 supplementals moving into

base– Invoices for 2017 ARP will reflect new price formula– Phased testing process underway to evaluate funder access to

reports, on-line tools, subscriber websites, etc. under new model– Communications with members before end of 2016

No new supplementals being proposed

Consolidation of MAAP5 into MAAP Users Group


List Management

Beth McRimmon, EPRI


What was the issue?

Inconsistent nomenclature for advisor roles Incorrect and blank rolesAdvisor changes without communication to the memberToo many “Invitation Only Committees”

Action Item from 2016 Winter NPC to find solutions to these issues


Advisor Role Titles & Usage Internal discussion & collaboration with members to

determine advisor role names & suggested usage.Role Suggested Usage Changes

Chairman, Co-Chair, Vice Chairman, or Technical Chair

Identifies the Utility Chair, Co-Chairs, Vice Chairs or Technical Chairs of the committee.

Changes are made by EPRI Staff within internal database as Chair’s rotate in and out of committees.

Primary

Identifies the key/main contact from a Company. (Replaces Funder, Member, Voting Member, Participant, Active Member or Coordinator, etc.)Only 1 Primary on a Committee/Per Company*

*In some cases the key contact is identified by Plant and not by Utility.

Changes need to be communicated between EPRI Staff and METT in advance.

Alternate

Identifies the back-up contact from a Company. (If applicable)Only 1 Alternate on a Committee/Per Company*

*In some cases the key contact is identified by Plant and not by Utility.

Changes can be made via METT Central or by EPRI Staff within internal database as needed.

Information Only

Identifies ALL other contacts that should be informed but are not a Primary or Alternate to the committee.

(Note: Information Only contacts will not display on Program Cockpits, however they can be viewed via METT Central.)

Changes can be made via METT Central or by EPRI Staff within internal database as needed.


Advisor Roles on the Cockpits

Updated Member Center Cockpit– Does not show “information only” contacts– No more blank roles


Invitation Only Committees

Reduced the number of “Invitation Only Committees”– Most are NPC or APC level

committees

VP approval is required to create a new “Invitation Only Committee”

Committee NameNUC Nuclear Power Council - Program 41NUC Nuclear Power Council - QA SubcommitteeNUC Nuclear Power Council Executive CommitteeNUC AP1 - Materials Degradation & Aging APCNUC AP1 PMMP Executive Committee Members (EC)NUC AP1 PMMP Executive Oversight Committee (EOC)NUC AP1.3 BWRVIP Executive CommitteeNUC AP1.3 BWRVIP Executive Oversight CommitteeNUC AP2 Fuel Reliability APCNUC AP3 Used Fuel & HLW Management APCNUC AP4 – NDE Coordinating CommitteeNUC AP4 - NDE Materials & Characterization APCNUC AP5 Equipment Reliability APCNUC AP7 MAAP Model Development and Testing TACNUC AP7 Risk & Safety Management APCNUC AP8 - Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) APCNUC AP9 - Chemistry & Radiation Safety APC


What’s next

Working with EPRI Staff to make all Role updates via METT Central.

Email notification for all changes.– Exception, will omit email notification for Information Only additions

or updates.

Other suggestions?


Funding Key Dates – 2017 Supplemental Allocation

Apr/May EPRI webcasts held for 2017 supplemental projects

May EPRI 2017 supplemental allocation package ready

July 1 Members complete initial supplemental selections

July/Aug EPRI uses initial selections to plan 2017 work scope

Sep 16 Members finalize selections

Oct 3 EPRI sends 2017 Nuclear Supplemental Funding Agreement (NSFA) (contract) to members for approval signatures

Nov 4 Members complete and return executed NSFA

Dec 16 Members ensure Program 41 Nuclear Power is checked on EPRI Price Sheet (base membership funding) and return to advisor (Corporate METT may perform this step)


Advisor Orientation

Tuesday, August 30th at 7:00 – 8:00 A.M.

Location: Conti Room (ML)

Contact: Chuck Olexik, [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


EPRI Web & Member Services Session

Tuesday, August 30th at 8:00 – 10:15 A.M.

Location: Conti Room (ML)

Contact: Jay Greene, [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


Delivering the Nuclear Promise

Neil Wilmshurst, EPRI


PMBD Support of DNP

Rick Way, EPRI


Agenda

Review of NMAC’s Maintenance Related ProductsCurrent State of Preventive Maintenance Basis Database

(PMBD)Future Vision of PMBD


Equipment Reliability

Collaboration Hub

for Preventive Maintenance

Equipment Reliability Working Group International

Equipment Reliability

Working Group

Maintenance Rule Users

Group

PM Working Group

Maintenance Planning

Users Group

Maintenance Managers

Users Group

Equipment Specific Users Groups


NMAC Maintenance Optimization Products

Web Based Products

Component Maintenance Guides

Component Apps


Maintenance Guide Content

Description/Tutorial • Provides information to develop a

working knowledge of the component.

Failure Modes• Includes the possible locations of

the failures, the mechanisms that can cause the failure, and the stressors that will accentuate the progression of the failures.

Troubleshooting• Failure information is used to

establish troubleshooting advice.

Condition Based Monitoring• Parameters that can be used for

condition based monitoring.

Preventive Maintenance• Recommended intervals for the

components and subcomponents addressed in the guide.

Special Maintenance Tasks• Information is provided that

exceeds that normally available in a vendor manual.

• Tasks that are 1) complex, 2) critical, and/or 3) difficult to access or perform.


Improved Technical Content Delivery


PM Basis Database History


PMBD Usage Following 2013 Web Release

Top 5 Users:

1. Xcel

2. TVA

3. Exelon

4. Duke

5. EdF


PMBD Familiarization Video and Quick Reference Guide

Product ID#: 3002007394

Publically AvailableProduct ID#: 3002007555

Publically Available


PMBD Failure Mode Information

Failure Location

Degradation Mechanism

Degradation Influence

Time Code

Vibration Analysis

Oil Analysis and

Lubrication

Minor Inspection

and Cleaning

Major Inspection

and Rebuild

Ops Rounds

Bearings - Sleeve

Wear Normal wear

UW10_30 Medium High Low High Low

Where, What,

and How

When Identify How Well


Source of Failure Modes

Failure Location

Degradation Mechanism

Degradation Influence

Time Code

Vibration Analysis

Oil Analysis

and Lubrication

Minor Inspection

and Cleaning

Major Inspection

and Rebuild

Ops Rounds

Bearings - Sleeve

Wear Normal wear

UW10_30 Medium High Low High Low

Information That Can Only Come From Experience


PMBD Vulnerability Calculation and Outputs

Low Voltage Switchgear Template


PMBD Vulnerability Calculation and Outputs: Non Crit


15 out of 25 possible Failure Modes Impacted – Do You Care?


PMBD Vulnerability Calculation and Outputs: Non Crit


Now 5 out of 25 possible Failure Modes Impacted – Do You Care?


Future of PM Basis Database

PMBD

Data

EPRI User InterfaceVulnerability Tool

Cost Module

PM Templates

Industry DataWork Order Information

Equipment Failure Data

Online Monitoring Data

PMBD Web ServicesIntegration with:

Utility ER Tools

3rd Party Software

Additional EPRI Products

Data IntegrityRegular Template Reviews Internally and with Industry

Groups


Recent Release: Severity ClassificationsFunctional Failure Mode

Severity Classification Category

Definition

1 Critical

A failure mode which causes an immediate loss of component function (100% probability of component failure). Component function is defined as the credited contributions to power generation, preservation of pressure boundary, mitigation of accidents or transients, environmental compliance, regulatory compliance, continuation of mission or preservation of personnel health or safety as defined in plant documents such as the Maintenance Rule Scoping Document. Degradation related to this category causes an equipment functional failure.

2 Severe

A failure mode which will result in a loss of function in a very short time if not immediately addressed (i.e. repaired, fixed, or replaced) or a delay in the return to power or could result in the severe degradation of the performance of the component such that system function is in imminent jeopardy.

3 Minor

A failure mode which is not expected to cause injury or property damage or system damage but will require unscheduled maintenance or repair to resolve. This doesn’t cause the component to fail (< 20% probability of component failure) but is an unacceptable nuisance (e.g. a housekeeping issue such as a water or oil leak).

4Inconsequential A failure mode with is not expected to cause system damage or require

maintenance to resolve.


Rolling Out – PMBD Web Servicespmbdws.epri.comUsed to integrate native ER software at utilities with PMBD

https://pmbdws.epri.com/


Key Take Away Points

Improved content delivery to assist in maintenance optimization – Web Based Products– Applications– Knowledge Transfer Technologies

EPRI’s focus is on PMBD data integrity

PMBD Future: Further integration of database with other products through web services


Quality Management Program

Carey Haas, EPRI“Presentation Placeholder”


TMC Update

Kerry Clemen, COG


Roundtable Discussion/Action Items



Closing Comments/Adjourn

Kerry Clemen, COG

nuclear manager of epri technology transfer (nmett ...€¦ · technical program value. overall...

Documents