numerical study on aerofoil stall - :: welcome to ijerest :: · pdf file ·...
Post on 07-Jun-2018
223 views
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Emerging Researches in Engineering Science and Technology-
Vol-2-Issue-4-April-2015-ISSN: 2393-9184
27
AbstractThis work involves usage of Reynolds Averaged
Navier Stokes Equation (RANSE) based Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) approach for the determination of stall angle
for Wortmann FX 79-W-151 aerofoil. Geometrical modelling of
this aerofoil has been done using ANSYS ICEM CFD and
simulations have been carried out using ANSYS CFX. Pitch
motion which is a rotation about y-axis and occurring in x-z
plane has been depicted here as yaw motion i.e. rotation about z
axis in x-y plane so that the flow around the aerofoil section can
be studied during rotation.Simulation of flow has been
accomplished for various angles of attack for determining both
static and dynamic stall. The limitation of RANSE solver with the
angle of attack and the subsequent flow separation has also been
studied.
Index TermsAerodynamics,CFD,Dynamic stall,Static stall.
I. INTRODUCTION
OMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) involves
solving of fluid flow problems by numerically solving the
Navier-Stokes equations. Navier-stokes equations are of
prime importance as they help solve majority of fluid flow
problems as its simplification leads us to Eulers equation, Potential equations and Linearized potential equations. CFD
helps in easier identification of flaws in the design and
accurately predicts the fluid and thermal flows, thereby saving
considerable time and cost in the production process. Thus
CFD finds its application in various fields such as aerospace,
marine, medical, automotive and chemical industries.
In the present work, aerodynamic study of a flow around an
aerofoil has been studied. Stall is an unfavorable condition
that exists when the lift on the aerofoil decreases on increase
in the angle of attack. This situation is highly undesirable as
the aircraft will start spinning downwards losing its altitude.
On reviewing various literatures, it can be understood that a
quite a number of wind tunnel experiments have been done in
estimating static and dynamic stall. Numerical studies using
panel methods and Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes
Equation (RANSE) based CFD have been limited only to the
Manuscript submitted for review on 20 January 2015.This work was
supported by the Department of Mechanical engineering, SSET, Ernakulam,
India.
Praphul T, B.Tech, Mechanical engineering, SSET, Ernakulam, India. (e-
mail: praphulmenon@gmail.com).
Dr. Sheeja Janardhanan,Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, SSET, Ernakulam, India. (e-
mail:sheejajanardhanan@gmail.com).
estimation of static stall. Thus the idea of this work is mooted
based on [2]. This work deals with the measurements with
sinusoidal pitching and constant angular velocities and
dynamic stall characteristics. Under dynamic stall conditions,
maximum value of lift coefficient was up to 80% higher than
that for static lift. In the present work, pitch (rotation about y-
axis) motions in x-z plane have been transformed to the x-y
plane and consequent yaw (rotation about z-axis) motions
have been targeted to find out stall angles in static and
dynamic motions of the aerofoil.
II. PROBLEM FORMULATION
A. Geometrical modelling
Geometrical modelling of the aerofoil has been carried out
using ICEM CFD. Data points were imported to ICEM CFD
using a .dat file obtained from UIUC airfoil coordinates
database. The aerofoil was then modelled to the specifications
as obtained from [2]. Fig. 1shows the aerofoil geometry.
To simulate the wind tunnel experiment [2], a wind tunnel of
dimensions 9m x 2.5mx 2m has been created around the
aerofoil using ICEM CFD.
Numerical Study on Aerofoil Stall
Praphul Tand Sheeja Janardhanan
C
Fig. 1Aerofoil geometry
Fig. 2.Wireframe model of the wind tunnel
International Journal of Emerging Researches in Engineering Science and Technology-
Vol-2-Issue-4-April-2015-ISSN: 2393-9184
28
The inner domain and outer domain has been created using
ICEM CFD to perform both the static and dynamic stall
simulations on the aerofoil are as follows
B. Meshing
Structured H mesh has been chosen for the analysis. Grid
independency study has been carried out using ANSYS CFX.
Mesh size with density of 1.5 million cellshas been thus
chosen as the adequate mesh size.For performing the analysis
of static and dynamic stall, the same mesh density as obtained
through grid independency was retained. Meshing strategy
involved for carrying out the static and dynamic stall
simulations has been based on [6]where an interface mesh
with circular cylindrical inner domain encompassing a ship
and cuboidal fluid domain were developed and used for
hydrodynamic analysis. This type of mesh reduces the
complexity of rotating the aerofoil and remeshing each time
for an orientation, facilitating the rotation of cells in the inner
domain alone, thus saving considerable time and effort.
C. Boundary conditions
Simulations carried out for wind tunnel experiment and stall
(both static and dynamic) involved the following boundary
conditions.
The boundary conditions are as follows:
Aerofoil wall no slip wall
Bottom wall no slip wall
Inlet inlet
Outlet outlet
Side 1 wall no slip wall
Side 2 wall no slip wall
Top Opening
Turbulent intensity was kept below 1%, air flow speed was
taken to be 50 m/s as in [2].
The turbulence model has been taken ask- SST as found
from [1].
Fig. 3. Wireframe model of the inner domain.
Fig. 4. Wireframe model of the outer domain.
Fig. 5. Mesh model selected after performing the grid independency
study.
Fig. 6. Mesh model of the inner domain.
Fig. 7. Mesh model of the outer domain.
Fig. 8. Boundary condition as applied to the aerofoil
International Journal of Emerging Researches in Engineering Science and Technology-
Vol-2-Issue-4-April-2015-ISSN: 2393-9184
29
D. CFD analysis
1) Static stall
Static stall is the stall condition observed for the flow over the
aerofoil at a fixed angle of attack. For static stall estimations,
the inner domain was rotated about the z axis in counter
clockwise as well as clockwise directions for various angles of attack. The various angles of attack under consideration here
are from 0 degree to 15 degree in steps of 2.5 degree
increments for each angle.
2) Dynamic stall
Dynamic stall occurs when there is sudden change in the angle
of attack by the aerofoil. A sinusoidal rotation about z-axis
was given to the inner domain in CFX pre in order to obtain
yaw movement. The sinusoidal function is as follows:
ta sin (1)
= Amplitude of oscillation.
a=Maximum amplitude of oscillation = 0.2618 rad
= Angular frequency of oscillation = 0.5 rad/sec
t = instantaneous time in s
.txt, .xlsx files were written to give inputs to the CFX solver
for interpolating the values. Animation on the dynamic stall
analysis was also performed.
III. RESULTS
A. CFD Validation
Validation of CFD was done by comparing the values of
coefficient of lift obtained for the aerofoil at zero degree of attack between the CFX simulation and the experimental value
obtained from [2]as shown
The values thus are close to each other thus validating the mesh and CFD analysis.
B. Static stall
1) Anticlockwise direction
It is observed that the stall occurs between 12.5 and 15
degrees. This is because of the flow separation that occurs
between 12.5 and 15 degrees that causes the lift force to drop
causing stall.
Fig. 9. Boundary condition as applied to the wind tunnel
Fig. 10. Graph plot comparing values of coefficient of lift vs. angle of
attack for static stall simulations performed in anticlockwise direction.
0, 0.216
2.5, 0.414
5, 0.571
7.5, 0.728
10, 0.92
12.5, 0.95
13.75, 0.896
15, 0.937
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 13.75 15
Co
effi
cien
t o
f li
ft (
Cl)
Angle of attack (degrees)
Static Stall in Yaw (Anticlockwise Direction)
TABLE I
COMPARISON OF COEFFICIENT OF LIFT
Experiment (Mohlmann, 2007)
Present CFD
lC 0.2 0.2144
Fig. 11. Velocity and pressure plots on the aerofoil at 0 degree angle of
attack.
International Journal of Emerging Researches in Engineering Science and Technology-
Vol-2-Issue-4-April-2015-ISSN: 2393-9184
30
Fig. 13. Velocity and pressure plots on the aerofoil at 5 degree angle of
attack in the anti-clockwise direction.
Fig. 14. Velocity and pressure plots on the aerofoil at 7.5 degree angle
of attack in the anti-clockwise direction.
Fig. 12. Velocity and pressure plots on the aerofoil at 2.5 degree angle
of attack in the anticlockwise direction