nuremberg code

21
NUREMBERG NUREMBERG CODE CODE Presented by: Presented by: Jocelyn D’souza Jocelyn D’souza Ketki Kamble Ketki Kamble Krutika Makhare Krutika Makhare Linda Mascarenhas Linda Mascarenhas

Upload: arlen

Post on 14-Jan-2016

193 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

NUREMBERG CODE. Presented by: Jocelyn D’souza Ketki Kamble Krutika Makhare Linda Mascarenhas Vindhya Shetty. What is Nuremberg Code?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NUREMBERG CODE

NUREMBERG NUREMBERG CODECODE

Presented by:Presented by: Jocelyn D’souzaJocelyn D’souza Ketki KambleKetki Kamble Krutika MakhareKrutika Makhare Linda MascarenhasLinda Mascarenhas Vindhya ShettyVindhya Shetty

Page 2: NUREMBERG CODE

What is Nuremberg What is Nuremberg Code?Code?

The The Nuremberg CodeNuremberg Code is a set of is a set of research ethics principles for research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a human experimentation set as a result of the Subsequent result of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials at the end of Nuremberg Trials at the end of the Second World War.the Second World War.

Page 3: NUREMBERG CODE
Page 4: NUREMBERG CODE

> The Holocaust was the systematic, annihilation of six million Jews by the Nazi regime during World War 2.

> "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire.

> The Nazis, believed that Germans were "racially superior" > The Nazis, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews were "inferior."and that the Jews were "inferior."

> By 1945, the Germans and their collaborators killed nearly two out of every three European Jews as part of the "Final Solution," the Nazi policy to murder the Jews of Europe.

Page 5: NUREMBERG CODE

HistoryHistory• No ethical guidelines for research existedNo ethical guidelines for research existed in the major in the major Allied countries before Nuremberg Code.Allied countries before Nuremberg Code.

• Nazi doctors performed experiments on concentration Nazi doctors performed experiments on concentration camp prisoners.camp prisoners.

• Exploited by forcing to participate in research without consent.

• Subjects experienced extreme pain or torture, and in Subjects experienced extreme pain or torture, and in most of them they suffered permanent injury, mutilation, most of them they suffered permanent injury, mutilation, or death.or death.

Page 6: NUREMBERG CODE

Experiments of Nazi Doctors Military Experiments - High Altitude - Freezing Temperature - Sea Water - Sulfanilamide Injuries and Illnesses - Malaria - Tuberculosis - Bone Grafting - Phosgene - Bone,muscle,joint transplantation - Sterilization - Artificial insemination Racial Diagnosis - Jewish Collection Twin Studies

Page 7: NUREMBERG CODE

These experimentations and research were crimes committed in the guise of scientific research.

Experiments caused unnecessary suffering and injury.Experiments caused unnecessary suffering and injury.

Camps were liberated gradually when the main victorious Allied forces of World War II advanced on the German army.

The plan for the "Trial of European War Criminals" was drafted by Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and the War Department as a method of dealing with the Nazi leadership.

On January 14, 1942, representatives from the nine occupied countries met in London to draft the Inter-Allied Resolution on German War Crimes , agreed on the format of punishment for those responsible for war crimes during World War II

Page 8: NUREMBERG CODE

Nuremberg Trial

Page 9: NUREMBERG CODE

Nuremberg trial was held in 1945-1946, by IMT in Nuremberg trial was held in 1945-1946, by IMT in which Allies prosecuted German military leaders, which Allies prosecuted German military leaders, political officials, industrialists and financiers for political officials, industrialists and financiers for crimes committed during World War II.crimes committed during World War II.

The trials were held in the city of Nuremberg, The trials were held in the city of Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany at the PALACE OF JUSTICE.Bavaria, Germany at the PALACE OF JUSTICE.

Two trials were conducted:Two trials were conducted: (a) TRIALS OF THE MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS.(a) TRIALS OF THE MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS. (b) TRIALS OF LESSER WAR CRIMINALS.(b) TRIALS OF LESSER WAR CRIMINALS. (i) The Doctors Trial(i) The Doctors Trial (ii) The Judges Trial(ii) The Judges Trial

Page 10: NUREMBERG CODE

Justice Robert Jackson, Chief Prosecutor for the United States at the Nuremberg Trials.

Great Britain's JudgesJudge was Geoffrey Lawrence. Alternate judge was Norman Birkett.

The American JudgesJudge was Francis Biddle.Alternate was John Parker.

The French Judges Judge was Henri Donnedieu de Vabres. French alternate Robert Falco.

Judges from the Soviet Union Judge was Ion Nikitchenko. His alternate was Alexander Volchkov

Page 11: NUREMBERG CODE

24 defendants were executed as a result of the Nuremberg trials, 128 were sent to prison, and 35 were acquitted.

Twenty-one of the 24 were convicted; of these, 12 were sentenced to hang and the remainder were sent to prison.

Page 12: NUREMBERG CODE

The Nuremberg trials had a great influence on the development of international criminal law.

The Conclusions of the Nuremberg trials served as models for: >The Genocide Convention, 1948. >The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. >The Nuremberg Principles, 1950. >The Convention on the Abolition of the Statute of Limitations on War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, 1968. >The Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War, 1949; its supplementary protocols, 1977.

Page 13: NUREMBERG CODE

Nuremberg CodeNuremberg Code1. Voluntary informed consent1. Voluntary informed consent   

2. Fruitful result for the good of the society 2. Fruitful result for the good of the society

3. Prior experimentation on animals and prior knowledge of the 3. Prior experimentation on animals and prior knowledge of the problemproblems s

4. Avoidance of unnecessary physical or mental injury4. Avoidance of unnecessary physical or mental injury

5. Banning of known lethal or disable procedures5. Banning of known lethal or disable procedures

6. Degree of risks should exceed benifits6. Degree of risks should exceed benifits

7. Proper preparation and proper facilities to prevent injury or death7. Proper preparation and proper facilities to prevent injury or death

8. Performance of experiments only by scientifically qualified persons8. Performance of experiments only by scientifically qualified persons

9. Participants may freely end the experimentation.9. Participants may freely end the experimentation.

10. The experiments must stop if it proves too dangerous10. The experiments must stop if it proves too dangerous

Page 14: NUREMBERG CODE

Although it did not carry the force of law, the Nuremberg Code Although it did not carry the force of law, the Nuremberg Code was the first international document which advocated voluntary was the first international document which advocated voluntary participation and informed consentparticipation and informed consent

The first and the longest principle is “The voluntary consent of The first and the longest principle is “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”the human subject is absolutely essential.”

InformedInformed consent, with specific reliance on the Nuremberg consent, with specific reliance on the Nuremberg Code, is Code, is the basis of the International Ethical Guidelines for the basis of the International Ethical Guidelines for BiomedicalBiomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, the most Research Involving Human Subjects, the most recent guidelinesrecent guidelines promulgated by the WHO and the Councilpromulgated by the WHO and the Council for for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.International Organizations of Medical Sciences.

Page 15: NUREMBERG CODE

Informed ConsentInformed ConsentFirst provision of Nuremberg Code:

“voluntary consent of human subject is absolutely essential”

Subjects are made fully aware of nature and purpose of research

Persons involved have the legal capacity to give consent and Consent is voluntarily given.

Page 16: NUREMBERG CODE

Informed ConsentInformed Consent Description of any risks or

discomforts and benefits to subject. Disclosure of appropriate alternative

treatments if any exist. Describe protection of

confidentiality of personal records. If there is risk, describe precautions

and treatments available.

Page 17: NUREMBERG CODE

Criticism# # The regulations were ambiguous, vague and in many instances, The regulations were ambiguous, vague and in many instances,

impossible to fulfill.impossible to fulfill.

# Disliked the very idea of a single, concrete set of standards to guide # Disliked the very idea of a single, concrete set of standards to guide behavior in such a complex matter as human experimentationbehavior in such a complex matter as human experimentation

# Conceived in reference to Nazi atrocities and not considered # Conceived in reference to Nazi atrocities and not considered adequate for the conduct of medical research in other parts of the adequate for the conduct of medical research in other parts of the world.world.

# Consent clause was too extreme and not feasible with the realities # Consent clause was too extreme and not feasible with the realities of clinical research.of clinical research.

Page 18: NUREMBERG CODE

In view of the apparent ineffectiveness of the Nuremberg Code and the narrowness of its scope, the World Medical Association drafted the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), which was designed for professional use and distinguished between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research.

Page 19: NUREMBERG CODE

ConclusionConclusion The Nuremberg Code has served as a foundation for ethical The Nuremberg Code has served as a foundation for ethical

clinical research. clinical research.

Focused attention on the fundamental rights of research Focused attention on the fundamental rights of research participants and on the responsibilities of investigators. participants and on the responsibilities of investigators.

It has resulted in the development of other initiatives- e.g. the It has resulted in the development of other initiatives- e.g. the Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont Report—designed to Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont Report—designed to ensure the rights and safety of human beings taking part in ensure the rights and safety of human beings taking part in medical researchmedical research

It has served as an authoritative reference point for general It has served as an authoritative reference point for general debate and for critics of human experimentation. debate and for critics of human experimentation.

Page 20: NUREMBERG CODE

ReferencesReferences www.cirp.org/library/ethics/www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nurembergnuremberg// ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nurembergnuremberg.html.html www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/.../fwww.law.umkc.edu/faculty/.../ftrialstrials//

nurembergnuremberg//nurembergnuremberg.htm.htm history1900s.about.com/cs/history1900s.about.com/cs/nurembergtrialnurembergtrial// www.cirp.org/library/ethics/www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nurembergnuremberg//

Page 21: NUREMBERG CODE