nwa 32nd annual meeting, reno, nv, 13-18 october 2007 identifying large midlevel updrafts with...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007
Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width
Matthew J. Bunkers
NOAA/NWS, Rapid City, SD
Leslie R. Lemon
OU/CIMMS & NOAA/NWS/WDTB, Norman, OK
![Page 2: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Motivation and outline
• Hypothesis: SW can be used to indirectly infer potential for “very large” hail
» Very large hail linked with broad & strong UDs» Broad & strong UDs relatively “smooth”/laminar» SW related to turbulence; used to infer smooth UDs» “Large areas” of low SW in UD region implies
potential for very large hail
• SW largely ignoredand underutilized
![Page 3: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Large UDs and large ( 2”) hail
• Stronger UDs larger hail– Hailstone VT ~25-50 m s-1 for ≥ 2” hail
• However, intense*/narrow UDs canbe detrimental (Browning 1977)– Embryos “wasted” or hailstones rise too fast
• Large/broad UDs appear most critical– Optimally long (single) hailstone trajectories
» Updraft-relative flow very important (Nelson 1983, 87)
* Maximum observed/estimated UD speeds around 50 m s-1 based on several studies.
![Page 4: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Smooth UD observations
• Aircraft penetrations of UDs: 1960s80s– Below/near cloud base & within midlevels
» U. of WY, John Marwitz and collaborators» SDSM&T, T-28 storm-penetrating aircraft
• Strong UD cores are unequivocally smooth– Weaker/smaller UDs sometimes turbulent
![Page 5: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
T-28 path
• Fig. 9 from Musil et al. (1986, JCAM)
• ~50 m s-1 UD ~23 kft; UD core spans 7-8 km
• Adiabatic UD core; 6 g m-3 liquid; minimal ice
• Minimal turbulence in UD core; no mixing
• 3.5” diameter hail
T-28
West to east
![Page 6: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
SW and turbulence
• SW: Measure of velocity dispersion in sample– (i) data quality– (ii) turbulence intensity– (iii) mean wind shear across beam
» Gust fronts, mesocyclones, and broad/intense UDs» Assumes high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); VCP dependent
• FMH #11, Part C…– Low SW values within UDs indicate unmixed UDs,
characterized by high helicity
![Page 7: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
• Three-body scatter spikes (TBSSs) may distort storm patterns, producing large SW– Lemon (1998a, 1999)– Smallcomb (2006)
• Also large SW with*:– Areas of low SNR– UDmeso coincidence
» All are fairly common,but you can look higher
SW complications
* The usual range limits for velocity also apply for SW.
![Page 8: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Procedure for examining UDs
• Start with Z/V & note the following:– BWER location, high reflectivity core aloft,
storm-top divergence, and max echo top
• Evaluate SW in conjunction with above– Heights 15-35 kft (4.6-10.7 km); higher better
» Find max breadth* of SW values <4 m s-1
» Look just prior to hail occurrence Only 1-4 min for hail to reach ground based on VT
* Updrafts can be horseshoe-shaped or oblong, typically oriented to motion (not often circular).
![Page 9: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Radar analysis procedure
• Used GR Analyst– Increasing use in media and NWS
• Smoothing turned off (mostly)– Easier to compare bins
• Looked for vertical/temporal continuity
• Some cases indeterminable
![Page 10: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Example 1: 18 Jun 1992, 2253z
• KTLX, VCP21
• 2.75” hail 2300-2303z
• Width: 3.8 nm or 7.0 km at 4.3°
• Distance: 35 nm
• Height: 18 kft agl
3.3°9.8°0.4°1.4°2.4°4.3°6.0°9.8°14.6°
xx
![Page 11: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Example 1: cross-section
![Page 12: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Example 2: 29 Jun 2000, 2300z
• KLNX, VCP11
• 4.5” hail 2307z
• Width: 8 nm or 14.8 km at 2.5°
• Distance: 93 nm(near limit)
• Height: 30 kft agl
0.6°2.5°3.5°
xx
![Page 13: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Results (37 cases 2”+ hail)
• Based on SW, UD widths 5-15 km (3-8 nm)– Agrees very well with previous obs. studies
• SW indeterminate at times– Data can be very noisy; hard to locate signature– Many BWERs have high SW (SNR, TBSS, meso)– Function of VCP and viewing angle
• Correlation only 0.35» Disregarding the two 7” hailstones, = 0.54
![Page 14: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Hail Size vs. "Updraft" Width
y = 0.34x + 1.73
R2 = 0.12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0"Updraft" Width (nm)
Hai
l D
iam
eter
(in
)
Plot with all data
![Page 15: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Hail Size vs. "Updraft" Width
y = 0.37x + 1.38
R2 = 0.29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0"Updraft" Width (nm)
Hai
l D
iam
eter
(in
)
Plot without the 7” stones
![Page 16: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Summary
• Corroborates prior studies of “smooth” UDs
• SW has only limited potential for inferring ≥ 2” hail– SW can be rather “messy”– SW cannot be used alone*
» BWER, STD, 50/65-dBZ cores, meso, TBSS*
• Can this signature be used operationally? – F.A.R. unknown, pending further study…– SW resolution in AWIPS? VCP12 sampling?– Will dual-pol radar trump this signature?
![Page 17: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Thanks for your attention!
PowerPoint available here:
http://weather.gov/unr/?n=scm
![Page 18: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
References• Browning, K. A., 1977: The structure and mechanisms of hailstorms. Hail: A Review of Hail Science and Hail Suppression, Meteor. Monogr., No. 38, Amer.
Meteor. Soc., 1–43. • Browning, K. A., and R. J. Donaldson Jr., 1963: Airflow and structure of a tornadic storm. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 533–545. • Browning, K. A., and G. B. Foote, 1976: Airflow and hail growth in supercell storms and some implications for hail suppression. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 102, 499–533. • Crum, T. D., and R. L. Alberty, 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 1669–1687. • Donavon, R. A., and K. A. Jungbluth, 2007: Evaluation of a technique for radar identification of large hail across the upper Midwest and central plains of the
United States. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 244–254. • Foote, G. B., 1984: A study of hail growth utilizing observed storm conditions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23, 84101. • Klazura, G. E., and D. A. Imy, 1993: A description of the initial set of analysis products available from the NEXRAD WSR-88D system. Bull. Amer. Meteor.
Soc., 74, 1293–1311. • Knight, C. A., and N. C. Knight, 2001: Hailstorms. Severe Convective Storms. Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 223–254. • Krauss, T. W., and J. D. Marwitz, 1984: Precipitation processes within an Alberta supercell hailstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1025–1034. • Lemon, L. R., 1998a: The radar “three-body scatter spike”: An operational large-hail signature. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 327–340. • Lemon, L. R., 1998b: Updraft identification with radar. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 709–712. • Lemon, L. R., 1999: Operational uses of velocity spectrum width data. Preprints, 29th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteor., Montreal, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc.,
776–779.• Lemon, L. R., and D. W. Burgess, 1993: Supercell associated deep convergence zone revealed by a WSR-88D. Preprints, 26th Conf. on Radar Meteor.,
Norman, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 206–208. • Lemon, L. R., and S. Parker, 1996: The Lahoma storm deep convergence zone: Its characteristics and role in storm dynamics and severity. Preprints, 18th
Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 70–75. • Marwitz, J. D., 1972: The structure and motion of severe hailstorms. Part I: Supercell storms. J. Appl. Meteor., 11, 166–179. • Marwitz, J. D., 1973: Trajectories within the weak echo region of hailstorms. J. Appl. Meteor., 12, 1174–1182. • Musil, D. J., A. J. Heymsfield, and P. L. Smith, 1986: Microphysical characteristics of a well-developed weak echo region in a high plains supercell
thunderstorm. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 1037–1051. • Musil, D. J., S. A. Christopher, R. A. Deola, and P. L. Smith, 1991: Some interior observations of southeastern Montana hailstorms. J. Appl. Meteor., 30,
1596–1612. • Nelson, S. P., 1983: The influence of storm flow structure on hail growth. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 1965–1983.• Nelson, S. P., 1987: The hybrid multicellularsupercellular storm—an efficient hail producer. Part II: General characteristics and implications for hail growth.
J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2060–2073. • Smallcomb, C., 2006: Hail spike impacts on Doppler radial velocity data during several recent lower Ohio Valley convective events. Preprints, 23d Conf. on
Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, P9.2. • WDTB, 2005, Hail storms. http://www.wdtb.noaa.gov/courses/awoc/ICSvr1/lesson2/player.html• WDTB, 2005, Storm interrogation. http://www.wdtb.noaa.gov/courses/awoc/ICSvr3/lesson23/player.html• WDTB, 2005, Updraft location in a sheared convective cell. http://www.wdtb.noaa.gov/courses/awoc/ICSvr3/lesson2/player.html• Witt, A., and S. P. Nelson, 1991: The use of single-Doppler radar for estimating maximum hailstone size. J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 425–431.
![Page 19: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Large UDs and large ( 2”) hail
-25°C
* Microphysics and kinematics can be complicating and/or limiting factors to hail growth.
![Page 20: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Example 3: 17 Aug 1994, 1950z
• KTLX, VCP21
• 3” hail 1945-1955z
• Width: 7.3 nm or 13.5 km at 3.3°
• Distance: 70 nm
• Height: 28 kft agl
xx
2.4°4.3°6.0°3.3°4.3°
![Page 21: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Example 3: cross-section
![Page 22: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Example 4: 2 Sep 1995, 1255z
• KFSD, VCP11(tough case)
• 4.5” hail 1300-1316z
• Width: 4.8 nm or 8.9 km at 4.3°
• Distance: 31 nm
• Height: 15 kft agl(up to 53.5 kft)
0.4°4.3°12.0°
xx
![Page 23: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Counter-example: Aurora, NE
* Only one hail report ≥ 2” (i.e., the 7” record); likely a special combination of microphysics & kinematics.
• KUEX, VCP11(6/22/03, 2354z)
• 7” hail 0004z; noTBSS; “tall” core
• Width: 3.8 nm or 7 km at 5.3°
• Distance: 36 nm
• Height: 21 kft agl(up to 56 kft)
0.5°5.3°12.0°
xx
![Page 24: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Aurora cross-section
![Page 25: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Just in case
• Figure from Wakimoto et al. (2004)
![Page 26: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Just in case
• Knight (1984)– “…the evidence
shows that the echo vault itself was neither a sufficient nor a necessary feature for the hail production.“
![Page 27: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Just in case
• Crum & Alberty (1993); Klazura & Imy (1993); Lemon (1999)
• SW has contributions from:» Turbulence intensity» Mean wind shear across beam» Poor data quality (weak SNR)» Artifacts (e.g., TBSSs)» Beam broadening at far ranges» Particle fall speed dispersion» Antenna rotation, clutter, system noise
![Page 28: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Just in case
• Abshayev (1982)– Detect hail with SW– Differences in fall velocities of hail and rain– Values >1.4 m s-1 indicate hail; larger values
are associated with larger hail– Only works for zenith observations, thus not
practical for hail detection
![Page 29: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Just in case
• ~ 50 m s-1 UDs– Nelson (1983), dual-Doppler analysis– Musil et al. (1986), T-28 penetration– Bluestein et al. (1988), sounding ascent– Lehmiller et al. (2001), vertical radar beam– Wakimoto et al. (2003), radar from aircraft
![Page 30: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Smooth UD observations
• Smoothness: accelerating flow*, condensation processes, helical nature of supercell UDs
* Negative buoyancy below cloud base implies upward pressure gradient (e.g., Marwitz 1972, 1973).
![Page 31: NWA 32nd Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 13-18 October 2007 Identifying Large Midlevel Updrafts with Spectrum Width Matthew J. Bunkers NOAA/NWS, Rapid City,](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649cf85503460f949c97a2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
UD identification with radar
• Lemon (1998b, 1999)– BWER/vault (Z) [Browning and Donaldson 1963]
» If no BWER, use reflectivity core aloft WER not location of deep, persistent UD
– Horizontal momentum conservation (V)– Smooth and non-turbulent areas (SW)
• WDTB, Witt & Nelson (1991), Lemon & Burgess (1993)– Max storm top and storm-top divergence– Inflow side of mesocyclone/mesoanticyclone– Deep convergence zone (DCZ)