oakley v. jay-y enterprise
TRANSCRIPT
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 1/36
COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)[email protected] K. Katzenellenbogen (SBN 223,370)[email protected] S. Razai (SBN 246,922)[email protected]
Samantha Y. Hsu (SBN 285,853)[email protected], MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Plaintiff OAKLEY, INC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLEY , INC., a Washingtoncorporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAY -Y ENTERPRISE CO., INC, aCalifornia corporation,
Defendant.
))))
)))))))
Civil Action No.
COMPLAINT FORPATENT INFRINGEMENT
DEMAND FOR J URY TRIAL
'13CV0866 JMGPC
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 1 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 2/36
-1- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) hereby complains of Defendant Jay-Y
Enterprise Co., Inc. (“Defendant” or “Jay-Y”) and alleges as follows:
I. J URISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 1338, as it arises under the patent laws of the United
States.
2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because
Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this
judicial district, including by selling and offering for sale infringing products in
this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this
judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly
to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of
commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,
which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to
Oakley’s claim.
3. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §1391 (b)
and (c), and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
II . THE PARTIES
4. Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One Icon,
Foothill Ranch, California 92610.
5. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant
Jay-Y is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of California, having its principal place of business at 632 New York Drive,
Pomona, California 91768.
6. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant
has committed the acts alleged herein within this judicial district.
/ / /
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 2 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 3/36
-2- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
II I . GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of
high quality eyewear since at least 1985. Oakley is the manufacturer and
retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are
protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.
8. On June 10, 1997, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
duly and lawfully issued United States Patent No. 5,638,145 (“the ’145 patent”),
entitled “Vented Eyeglass Lens.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all
right, title, and interest in the ’145 patent. A true and correct copy of the ’145
patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
9. On May 29, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D543,572 (“the D572
patent”), entitled “Eyeglass.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,
title, and interest in the D572 patent. A true and correct copy of the D572 patent
is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
10. On June 1, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D616,919 (“the D919
patent”), entitled “Eyeglass Front.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all
right, title, and interest in the D919 patent. A true and correct copy of the D919
patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
11. On August 26, 2003, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No. D478,929 (“the
D929 patent”), entitled “Eyeglass.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of allright, title, and interest in the D929 patent. A true and correct copy of the D929
patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
12. Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale and/or imports
into the United States eyewear that infringe Oakley’s intellectual property
rights.
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 3 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 4/36
-3- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
13. Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its
patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 287.
IV. CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Patent Infringement)(35 U.S.C. § 271)
14. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-13 of
this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
15. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
16. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in
acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the ’145
patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale
and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the ’145 patent, including
Defendant’s XLoop sunglass model “8X3579.”
17. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the ’145 patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
and/or constructive knowledge of the ’145 patent and its actions constitute
willful and intentional infringement of the ’145 patent. Defendant infringed the
’145 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew,
or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions
constituted infringement of the ’145 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of
the ’145 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its
industry.18. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in
acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D572
patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale
/ / /
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 4 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 5/36
-4- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the D572 patent, including
Defendant’s XLoop sunglass model “8X2292.”
19. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D572 patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
and/or constructive knowledge of the D572 patent and its actions constitute
willful and intentional infringement of the D572 patent. Defendant infringed
the D572 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant
knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions
constituted infringement of the D572 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement
of the D572 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its
industry.
20. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in
acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D919
patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale
and/or importing eyewear that are covered by the D919 patent, including
Defendant’s Biohazard sunglass model “8BZ66121.”
21. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D919 patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
and/or constructive knowledge of the D919 patent and its actions constitute
willful and intentional infringement of the D919 patent. Defendant infringed
the D919 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant
knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actionsconstituted infringement of the D919 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement
of the D919 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its
industry.
22. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, has, and
continues to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 5 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 6/36
-5- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D929
patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale
and/or importing eyewear that are covered by one or more claims of the D929
patent, including Defendant’s Polarized XLoop sunglass model “PZ/X2056”
and XLoop sunglass model “8X2056.”
23. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D929 patent were
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
and/or constructive knowledge of the D929 patent and its actions constitute
willful and intentional infringement of the D929 patent. Defendant infringed
the D929 patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant
knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions
constituted infringement of the D929 patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement
of the D929 patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its
industry.
24. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s patent
infringement, Defendant has derived and received gains, profits, and advantages
in an amount not presently known to Oakley.
25. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Oakley is entitled to damages for
Defendant’s infringing acts and treble damages together with interests and costs
as fixed by this Court.
26. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Oakley is entitled to Defendant’s total
profits from the sale of eyewear that infringe any one of Oakley’s design
patents.27. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Oakley is entitled to reasonable
attorneys’ fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.
28. Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, Oakley has suffered great and
irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.
/ / /
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 6 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 7/36
-6- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
29. Defendant continues to directly and/or indirectly infringe Oakley’s
patents to the great and irreparable injury of Oakley, unless enjoined by this
Court.
WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against Defendant
for the following relief:
A. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the ’145
patent, the D572 patent, the D919 patent, and the D929 patent under 35 U.S.C. §
271;
B. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its
respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and
those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or
indirectly infringing the ’145 patent, the D572 patent, the D919 patent, or the
D929 patent patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271;
C. That pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Defendant account for all gains,
profits, and advantages derived from Defendant’s infringement and that
Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by Oakley as a result of
Defendant’s infringement;
D. That pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Defendant account for its total
profit from Defendant’s infringement of any of Oakley’s design patents;
E. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages
because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case;
F. An award to Oakley of the attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costsincurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
H. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of
this action against Defendant;
I. That Oakley have and recover the costs of this civil action,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees;
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 7 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 8/36
-7- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
J. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of
this action against Defendant; and,
K. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
proper.
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Dated: April 10, 2013 By: /s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandLauren Keller KatzenellenbogenAli S. Razai
Samantha Y. HsuAttorneys for Plaintiff OAKLEY, INC
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 8 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 9/36
-8- COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
DEMAND FOR J URY TRIAL
Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so
triable.
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Dated: April 10, 2013 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. FriedlandLauren Keller KatzenellenbogenSamantha Y. HsuAli S. Razai
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC
15198452
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 9 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 10/36
-i- Table of Exhibits
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
2
2
28
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
Page #
Exhibit A ............................................................................................................... 1
Exhibit B ............................................................................................................... 7
Exhibit C ............................................................................................................. 12
Exhibit D ............................................................................................................. 16
15197503
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 10 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 11/36
EXHIBIT A
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 11 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 12/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 12 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 13/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 13 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 14/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 14 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 15/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 15 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 16/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 16 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 17/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 17 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 18/36
EXHIBIT B
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 18 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 19/36Exhibit BPage 7
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 19 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 20/36Exhibit BPage 8
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 20 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 21/36Exhibit BPage 9
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 21 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 22/36Exhibit BPage 10
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 22 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 23/36Exhibit BPage 11
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 23 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 24/36
EXHIBIT C
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 24 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 25/36Exhibit CPage 12
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 25 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 26/36Exhibit CPage 13
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 26 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 27/36Exhibit CPage 14
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 27 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 28/36Exhibit CPage 15
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 28 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 29/36
EXHIBIT D
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 29 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 30/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 30 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 31/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 31 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 32/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 32 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 33/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 33 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 34/36
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 34 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 35/36
65HY CIVIL COVER SHEET7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSW
URYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b) &RX QW\R I5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII & RX QW\RI5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG'HIHQG DQW
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
127( ,1/$1'&21'(01$7,21&$6(686(7+(/2&$7,212)7+(75$&72)/$1',192/9('
(c)$WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) $WWRUQH\V(If Known)
I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION(Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant
u 86*RYHUQPHQW u )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ PTF DEF PTF D
3ODLQWLII (U.S. Government Not a Party) &LWL]HQRI7KLV6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGor 3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u
RI%XVLQHVV,Q7KLV6WDWH
u 86*RYHUQPHQW u 'LYHUVLW\ &LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGand 3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u
'HIHQGDQW (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH
&LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID u u )RUHLJQ1DWLRQ u
)RUHLJQ&RXQWU\
V. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
u ,QVXUDQFH PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH u $SSHDO86& u )DOVH&ODLPV$FW
u 0DULQH u $LUSODQH u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ RI3URSHUW\86& u :LWKGUDZDO u 6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQP
u 0LOOHU$FW u $LUSODQH3URGXFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2WKHU 86& u $QWLWUXVW
u 1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW /LDELOLW\ u +HDOWK&DUH u %DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ
u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW u $VVDXOW/LEHO 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO PROPERTY RIGHTS u &RPPHUFH
(QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW 6ODQGHU 3HUVRQDO,QM XU\ u &RS\ULJKWV u 'HSRUWDWLRQ
u 0HGLFDUH$FW u )HGHUDO(PSOR\HUV¶ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 3DWHQW u 5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFH
u 5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG /LDELOLW\ u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO u 7UDGHPDUN &RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLR
6WXGHQW/RDQV u 0DULQH ,QMXU\3URGXFW u &RQVXPHU&UHGLW
([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV u 0D ULQH 3 UR GX FW /LD ELOL W\ LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY u &DEOH6DW79
u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW /LDELOLW\ PERSONAL PROPERTY u )DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV u +,$II u 6HFXULWLHV&RPPRG
RI9HWHUDQ¶V%HQHILWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 2WKHU)UDXG $FW u %O DFN/ XQJ ([FKDQJH
u 6WRFNKROGHUV¶6XLWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ u /DERU0DQDJHPHQW u ',:&',::J u 2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FW
u 2WKHU&RQWUDFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW \ u 2WKH U3 HU VRQ DO 5HODWLR QV u 66,'7LWOH;9, u $JULFXOWXUDO$FWV
u &RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2 WK HU 3 HU VR QD O 3U RS HU W\ 'D PD JH u 5DLOZD\/DERU$FW u 56,J u (QYLURQPHQWDO0DWW
u )UDQFKLVH ,QMXU\ u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH u )DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO u )UHHGRPRI,QIRUPD
u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ /HDYH$FW $FW0HGLFDO0DOSUDFWLFH u 2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ u $UELWUDWLRQ
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS u (PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW FEDERAL TAX SUITS u $GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URF
u /DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ u 2WKHU&LYLO5LJKWV Habeas Corpus: ,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW u 7D[HV863ODLQWLII $FW5HYLHZRU$SSH
u )RUHFORVXUH u 9RWLQJ u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH RU'HIHQGDQW $JHQF\'HFLVLRQ
u 5HQW/HDVH(MHFWPHQW u (PSOR\PHQW u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH u ,56²7KLUG3DUW\ u &RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI
u 7RUWVWR/DQG u +RXVLQJ 6HQWHQFH 86& 6WDWH6WDWXWHV
u 7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ $FFRPPRGDWLRQV u *HQHUDO
u $OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\ u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 'HDWK3HQDOW\ IMMIGRATION
(PSOR\PHQW Other: u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQu $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 0DQGDPXV2WKHU u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ
2WKHU u &LYLO5LJ KWV $F WLRQV
u (GXFDWLRQ u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ
u &LYLO'HWDLQHH
&RQGLWLRQVRI
&RQILQHPHQW
V. ORIGIN(Place an “X” in One Box Only)
u 2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJ
u 5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW
u 5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW
u 5HLQVWDWHGRU 5HRSHQHG
u 7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW(specify)
u 0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
&LWHWKH86&LYLO6WDWXWHXQGHUZKLFK\RXDUHILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity )
%ULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIFDXVH
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$CLASS ACTION
81'(558/()5&Y3
DEMAND $ &+(&.<(6RQO\LIGHPDQGHGLQFRPSODLQW
JURY DEMAND: u <HV u 1R
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY(See instructions):
-8'*( '2&.(7180%(5
'$7( 6,*1$785(2)$77251(<2)5(&25'
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
5(&(,37 $02817 $33/<,1*,)3 -8'*( 0$*-8'*(
OAKLEY, INC., a Washington corporation
Michael K. Friedland, Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen, Ali S. RazaiKNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main St., 14th Fl., Irvine, CA 92614
JAY Y ENTERPRISES CO., INC., a California corporation
35 U.S.C. Sec. 271
Patent Infringement of U.S Patent Nos. 5638145, D543572, D616919, and D478929
Cathy Ann Bencivengo 12-CV-2458
04/10/2013 /s/Ali S. Razai
To be determined
'13CV0866 JMAGPC
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 35 of 36
7/28/2019 Oakley v. Jay-Y Enterprise
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oakley-v-jay-y-enterprise 36/36
-65HYHUVH5HY
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
$XWKRULW\)RU&LYLO&RYHU6KHHW
7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHVQRUVXSSOHPHQWVWKHILOLQJVDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJRURWKHUSDSHUVDV
UHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDVSURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULV
UHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHSXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW&RQVHTXHQWO\DFLYLOFRYHUVKHHWLVVXEPLWWHGWRWKH&OHUNR
&RXUWIRUHDFKFLYLOFRPSODLQWILOHG7KHDWWRUQH\ILOLQJDFDVHVKRXOGFRPSOHWHWKHIRUPDVIROORZV
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants.(QWHUQDPHVODVWILUVWPLGGOHLQLWLDORISODLQWLIIDQGGHIHQGDQW,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\XV
RQO\WKHIXOOQDPHRUVWDQGDUGDEEUHYLDWLRQV,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDQRIILFLDOZLWKLQDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\LGHQWLI\ILUVWWKHDJHQF\DQGWKHQWKHRIILFLDOJLYLQJERWKQDPHDQGWLWOH
(b) County of Residence.)RUHDFKFLYLOFDVHILOHGH[FHSW86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\ZKHUHWKHILUVWOLVWHGSODLQWLIIUHVLGHVDW
WLPHRIILOLQJ,Q86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\LQZKLFKWKHILUVWOLVWHGGHIHQGDQWUHVLGHVDWWKHWLPHRIILOLQJ127(,QODQ
FRQGHPQDWLRQFDVHVWKHFRXQW\RIUHVLGHQFHRIWKHGHIHQGDQWLVWKHORFDWLRQRIWKHWUDFWRIODQGLQYROYHG
(c) Attorneys.(QWHUWKHILUPQDPHDGGUHVVWHOHSKRQHQXPEHUDQGDWWRUQH\RIUHFRUG,IWKHUHDUHVHYHUDODWWRUQH\VOLVWWKHPRQDQDWWDFKPHQWQR
LQWKLVVHFWLRQVHHDWWDFKPHQW
II. Jurisdiction.7KHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQLVVHWIRUWKXQGHU5XOHD)5&Y3ZKLFKUHTXLUHVWKDWMXULVGLFWLRQVEHVKRZQLQSOHDGLQJV3ODFHDQ
LQRQHRIWKHER[HV,IWKHUHLVPRUHWKDQRQHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQSUHFHGHQFHLVJLYHQLQWKHRUGHUVKRZQEHORZ
8QLWHG6WDWHVSODLQWLII-XULVGLFWLRQEDVHGRQ86&DQG6XLWVE\DJHQFLHVDQGRIILFHUVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDUHLQFOXGHGKHUH
8QLWHG6WDWHVGHIHQGDQW:KHQWKHSODLQWLIILVVXLQJWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLWVRIILFHUVRUDJHQFLHVSODFHDQ;LQWKLVER[
)HGHUDOTXHVWLRQ7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHMXULVGLFWLRQDULVHVXQGHUWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDQDPHQGP
WRWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQDQDFWRI&RQJUHVVRUDWUHDW\RIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV,QFDVHVZKHUHWKH86LVDSDUW\WKH86SODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWFRGHWDN
SUHFHGHQFHDQGER[RUVKRXOGEHPDUNHG
'LYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLS7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHSDUWLHVDUHFLWL]HQVRIGLIIHUHQWVWDWHV:KHQ%R[LVFKHFNHGWKH
FLWL]HQVKLSRIWKHGLIIHUHQWSDUWLHVPXVWEHFKHFNHG. 6HH6HFWLRQ,,,EHORZ; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties.7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH-6LVWREHFRPSOHWHGLIGLYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLSZDVLQGLFDWHGDERYH0DUN
VHFWLRQIRUHDFKSULQFLSDOSDUW\
IV. Nature of Suit.3ODFHDQ;LQWKHDSSURSULDWHER[,IWKHQDWXUHRIVXLWFDQQRWEHGHWHUPLQHGEHVXUHWKHFDXVHRIDFWLRQLQ6HFWLRQ9,EHORZ
VXIILFLHQWWRHQDEOHWKHGHSXW\FOHUNRUWKHVWDWLVWLFDOFOHUNVLQWKH$GPLQLVWUDWLYH2IILFHWRGHWHUPLQHWKHQDWXUHRIVXLW,IWKHFDXVHILWVPRUHWK
RQHQDWXUHRIVXLWVHOHFWWKHPRVWGHILQLWLYH
V. Origin.3ODFHDQ;LQRQHRIWKHVL[ER[HV
2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJV&DVHVZKLFKRULJLQDWHLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVGLVWULFWFRXUWV
5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW3URFHHGLQJVLQLWLDWHGLQVWDWHFRXUWVPD\EHUHPRYHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWVXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ
:KHQWKHSHWLWLRQIRUUHPRYDOLVJUDQWHGFKHFNWKLVER[5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHPDQGHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWIRUIXUWKHUDFWLRQ8VHWKHGDWHRIUHPDQGDVWKHILOL
GDWH
5HLQVWDWHGRU5HRSHQHG&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHLQVWDWHGRUUHRSHQHGLQWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW8VHWKHUHRSHQLQJGDWHDVWKHILOLQJGDWH
7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW)RUFDVHVWUDQVIHUUHGXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQD'RQRWXVHWKLVIRUZLWKLQGLVWULFWWUDQVIHUVR
PXOWLGLVWULFWOLWLJDWLRQWUDQVIHUV
0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ&KHFNWKLVER[ZKHQDPXOWLGLVWULFWFDVHLVWUDQVIHUUHGLQWRWKHGLVWULFWXQGHUDXWKRULW\RI7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ
:KHQWKLVER[LVFKHFNHGGRQRWFKHFNDERYH
VI. Cause of Action.5HSRUWWKHFLYLOVWDWXWHGLUHFWO\UHODWHGWRWKHFDXVHRIDFWLRQDQGJLYHDEULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIWKHFDXVHDo not cite jurisdiction
statutes unless diversity. ([DPSOH86&LYLO6WDWXWH86&%ULHI'HVFULSWLRQ8QDXWKRUL]HGUHFHSWLRQRIFDEOHVHUYLFH
VII. Requested in Complaint.&ODVV$FWLRQ3ODFHDQ;LQWKLVER[LI\RXDUHILOLQJDFODVVDFWLRQXQGHU5XOH)5&Y3
'HPDQG,QWKLVVSDFHHQWHUWKHDFWXDOGROODUDPRXQWEHLQJGHPDQGHGRULQGLFDWHRWKHUGHPDQGVXFKDVDSUHOLPLQDU\LQMXQFWLRQ
-XU\'HPDQG&KHFNWKHDSSURSULDWHER[WRLQGLFDWHZKHWKHURUQRWDMXU\LVEHLQJGHPDQGHG
VIII. Related Cases.7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH-6LVXVHGWRUHIHUHQFHUHODWHGSHQGLQJFDVHVLIDQ\,IWKHUHDUHUHODWHGSHQGLQJFDVHVLQVHUWWKHGRFNHW
QXPEHUVDQGWKHFRUUHVSRQGLQJMXGJHQDPHVIRUVXFKFDVHV
Date and Attorney Signature.'DWHDQGVLJQWKHFLYLOFRYHUVKHHW
Case 3:13-cv-00866-GPC-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/10/13 Page 36 of 36