object recognizing

55
Object Recognizing

Upload: niloufer-fayaz

Post on 03-Jan-2016

51 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Object Recognizing. Recognition -- topics. Features Classifiers Example ‘winning’ system. Object Classes. Individual Recognition. Object parts Automatic, or query-driven. Window. Mirror. Window. Door knob. Headlight. Back wheel. Bumper. Front wheel. Headlight. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Object Recognizing

Object Recognizing

Page 2: Object Recognizing

Recognition -- topics

• Features

• Classifiers

• Example ‘winning’ system

Page 3: Object Recognizing

Object Classes

Page 4: Object Recognizing

Individual Recognition

Page 5: Object Recognizing

Object partsAutomatic, or query-driven

Headlight

Window

Door knob

Back wheel

Mirror

Front wheel Headlight

Window

Bumper

Page 6: Object Recognizing

Class Non-class

Page 7: Object Recognizing

Variability of Airplanes Detected

Page 8: Object Recognizing

Class Non-class

Page 9: Object Recognizing

Features and Classifiers

Same features with different classifiersSame classifier with different features

Page 10: Object Recognizing

Generic Features:The same for all classes

Simple (wavelets) Complex (Geons)

Page 11: Object Recognizing

Class-specific Features: Common Building Blocks

Page 12: Object Recognizing

Optimal Class Components?

• Large features are too rare

• Small features are found

everywhere

Find features that carry the highest amount of information

Page 13: Object Recognizing

Entropy

Entropy:

x = 0 1 H

p = 0.5 0.5 ? 0.1 0.9 0.47 0.01 0.99 0.08

)p(x log )p(x- H i2i

Page 14: Object Recognizing

Mutual information

H(C) when F=1 H(C) when F=0

I(C;F) = H(C) – H(C/F)

F=1 F=0

H(C)

))(()()( cPLogcPcH

Page 15: Object Recognizing

Mutual Information I(C,F)

Class:11010100

Feature:10011100

I(F,C) = H(C) – H(C|F)

Page 16: Object Recognizing

Optimal classification features

• Theoretically: maximizing delivered information minimizes classification error

• In practice: informative object components can be identified in training images

Page 17: Object Recognizing

Mutual Info vs. Threshold

0.00 20.00 40.00

Detection threshold

Mu

tu

al

Info

forehead

hairline

mouth

eye

nose

nosebridge

long_hairline

chin

twoeyes

Selecting Fragments

Page 18: Object Recognizing

Horse-class features

Car-class features

Pictorial features Learned from examples

Page 19: Object Recognizing

Star model

Detected fragments ‘vote’ for the center location

Find location with maximal vote

In variations, a popular state-of-the art scheme

Page 20: Object Recognizing

Bag of words

ObjectObject Bag of ‘words’Bag of ‘words’

Page 21: Object Recognizing

Bag of visual words A large collection of image patches

1.Feature detection 1.Feature detection and representationand representation

•Regular grid– & VogelSchiele ,2003

–Fei- ,Fei & Perona2005

Page 22: Object Recognizing
Page 23: Object Recognizing

Generate a dictionary using K-means clustering

Page 24: Object Recognizing
Page 25: Object Recognizing

Recognition by Bag of Words (BoD): Each class has its words historgram

Limited or no GeometrySimple and popular, no longer state-of-the art .

Page 26: Object Recognizing

HoG Descriptor Dallal, N & Triggs, B. Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection

Page 27: Object Recognizing

Shape context

Page 28: Object Recognizing

Recognition Class II:

SVM Example Classifiers

Page 29: Object Recognizing

SVM – linear separation in feature space

Page 30: Object Recognizing

Separating line: w ∙ x + b = 0 Far line: w ∙ x + b = +1Their distance: w ∙ ∆x = +1 Separation: |∆x| = 1/|w|Margin: 2/|w|

0+1

-1 The Margin

Page 31: Object Recognizing

Max Margin Classification

)Equivalently, usually used

How to solve such constraint optimization ?

The examples are vectors xi

The labels yi are +1 for class, -1 for non-class

Page 32: Object Recognizing

Solving the SVM problem

• Duality

• Final form

• Efficient solution

• Extensions

Page 33: Object Recognizing

Using Lagrange multipliers :

Using Lagrange multipliers: Minimize LP =

With αi > 0 the Lagrange multipliers

Page 34: Object Recognizing

Minimizing the Lagrangian

Minimize Lp :

Set all derivatives to 0:

Also for the derivative w.r.t. αi

Dual formulation: Maximize the Lagrangian w.r.t. the αi and the above two conditions.

Page 35: Object Recognizing

Solved in ‘dual’ formulation

Maximize w.r.t αi :

With the conditions:

Page 36: Object Recognizing

Dual formulation

Mathematically equivalent formulation: Can maximize the Lagrangian with respect to the αi

After manipulations – concise matrix form :

Page 37: Object Recognizing

Summary points

• Linear separation with the largest margin, f(x) = w∙x + b

• Dual formulation

• Natural extension to non-separable classes

• Extension through kernels, f(x) = ∑αi yi K(xi x) + b

Page 38: Object Recognizing

Felzenszwalb

• Felzenszwalb, McAllester, Ramanan CVPR 2008. A Discriminatively Trained, Multiscale, Deformable Part Model

• Many implementation details, will describe the main points.

Page 39: Object Recognizing

Using patches with HoG descriptors and classification by SVM

Person model HoG orientations with w > 0

Page 40: Object Recognizing

Object model using HoG

A bicycle and its ‘root filter ’The root filter is a patch of HoG descriptor Image is partitioned into 8x8 pixel cells In each block we compute a histogram of gradient orientations

Page 41: Object Recognizing

The filter is searched on a pyramid of HoG descriptors, to deal with unknown scale

Dealing with scale: multi-scale analysis

Page 42: Object Recognizing

A part Pi = (Fi, vi, si, ai, bi) .

Fi is filter for the i-th part, vi is the center for a box of possible positions for part i relative to the root position, si the size of this box

ai and bi are two-dimensional vectors specifying coefficients of a quadratic function measuring a score for each possible placement of the i-th part. That is, ai and bi are two numbers each, and the penalty for deviation ∆x, ∆y from the expected location is a1 ∆ x + a2 ∆y + b1 ∆x2 + b2 ∆y2

Adding Parts

Page 43: Object Recognizing

Bicycle model: root, parts, spatial map

Person model

Page 44: Object Recognizing
Page 45: Object Recognizing

The full score of a potential match is:  ∑ Fi ∙ Hi + ∑ ai1 xi + ai2 yi

+ bi1xi2 + bi2yi

2  

Fi ∙ Hi is the appearance part

xi, yi, is the deviation of part pi from its expected location in the model. This is the spatial part.

Match Score

Page 46: Object Recognizing

The score of a match can be expressed as the dot-product of a vector β of coefficients, with the image:

Score = β∙ψ

Using the vectors ψ to train an SVM classifier :β∙ψ > 1 for class examples

β∙ψ < 1 for class examples

Using SVM:

Page 47: Object Recognizing

β∙ψ > 1 for class examples β∙ψ < 1 for class examples

However, ψ depends on the placement z, that is, the values of ∆xi, ∆yi

 

We need to take the best ψ over all placements. In their notation :Classification then uses β∙f > 1

We need to take the best ψ over all placements. In their notation :

Classification then uses β∙f > 1

Page 48: Object Recognizing

search with gradient descent over the placement. This includes also the levels in the hierarchy. Start with the root filter, find places of high score for it. For these high-scoring locations, each for the optimal placement of the parts at a level with twice the resolution as the root-filter, using GD.

Final decision β∙ψ > θ implies class

Recognition

Essentially maximize ∑Fi Hi + ∑ ai1 xi + ai2 y + bi1x2 + bi2y2

Over placements (xi yi)

Page 49: Object Recognizing
Page 50: Object Recognizing

• Training -- positive examples with bounding boxes around the objects, and negative examples.

• Learn root filter using SVM

• Define fixed number of parts, at locations of high energy in the root filter HoG

• Use these to start the iterative learning

Page 51: Object Recognizing

Hard Negatives

The set M of hard-negatives for a known β and data set DThese are support vector (y ∙ f =1) or misses (y ∙ f < 1)

Optimal SVM training does not need all the examples, hard examples are sufficient. For a given β, use the positive examples + C hard examples Use this data to compute β by standard SVM Iterate (with a new set of C hard examples)

Page 52: Object Recognizing
Page 53: Object Recognizing

All images contain at least 1 bike

Page 54: Object Recognizing
Page 55: Object Recognizing

Future challenges :

• Dealing with very large number of classes – Imagenet, 15,000 categories, 12 million images

• To consider: human-level performance for at least one class