objectives: stability and the s -plane stability of an rc circuit 1 st and 2 nd order systems
DESCRIPTION
LECTURE 28: 1 st and 2 nd Order Systems. Objectives: Stability and the s -Plane Stability of an RC Circuit 1 st and 2 nd Order Systems - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ECE 8443 – Pattern RecognitionEE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete
• Objectives:Stability and the s-PlaneStability of an RC Circuit1st and 2nd Order Systems
• Resources:MIT 6.003: Lecture 18GW: Underdamped 2nd-Order SystemsCRB: System ResponseRVJ: RLC CircuitsMH: Control Theory and StabilityEC: Step ResponseWiki: Routh-Hurwitz Stability TestTBCO: Routh-Hurwitz Tutorial
LECTURE 28: 1st and 2nd Order Systems
URL:
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 2
Stability of CT Systems in the s-Plane
• Recall our stability condition for the Laplace transform of the impulse response of a CT linear time-invariant system:
• This implies the poles are in the left-half plane.This also implies:
• A system is said to be marginally stableif its impulse response is bounded:
In this case, at least one pole of the systemlies on the jω-axis.
• Recall periodic signals also have poles on the jω-axis because they are marginally stable.
• Also recall that the left-half plane maps to the inside of the unit circle in the z-plane for discrete-time (sampled) signals.
• We can show that circuits built from passive components (RLC) are always stable if there is some resistance in the circuit.
Nipssas
bsbsbsH iN
NN
MM
MM ...,,2,1for0Re
...
...)(
01
1
01
1
dtthtasth )(and0)(
tcth )(
LHP
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 3
Stability of CT Systems in the s-Plane
• Example: Series RLC Circuit
Using the quadratic formula:
LCsLRs
LCsH
/1)/(
/1)(
2
LCL
R
L
Rpp
1
22,
2
21
stablealways2
Re
poles,complextwo01
2
1
2
L
Rp
LCL
R
:2Case
stablealwaysL
R
LCL
R
L
R
stablealways
LCL
R
L
R
LCL
R
2bemusttermquadratic
01
22
LHPinpole01
22
polesrealtwo01
2
1
2
2
2
:Case
The RLC circuit is always stable.
Why?
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 4
Analysis of the Step Response For A 1st-Order System
• Recall the transfer function for a1st-order differential equation:
)(1)(
//)(
)()()()(
1)()(
)(
tuep
kty
ps
pk
s
pksY
pss
ksXsHsY
stusX
ps
ksH
pt
L
• Define a time constant as the time it takes for the response to reach 1/e (37%) of its value.
• The time constant in this case is equal to-1/p. Hence, the real part of the pole, which is the distance of the pole from the jω-axis, and is the bandwidth of the pole, is directly related to the time constant.
num = 1; den = [1 –p];
t = 0:0.05:10;
y = step(num, den, t);
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 5
Second-Order Transfer Function
• Recall our expression for a simple, 2nd-order differential equation:
• Write this in terms of two parameters, ζ and ωn, related to the poles:
• From the quadratic equation:
• There are three types of interestingbehavior of this system:
)zeta""is(2
)(22
2
nn
n
sssH
012
0001
2
)()()(asas
bsHtxbtya
dt
dya
dt
yd
1, 221 nnpp
d)(overdampe
axis) real (negative poles two:1
damped)y (criticall
at pole double:1
ed)(underdamp
polescomplex:10
ns
Impulse Response
Step Response
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 6
Step Response For Two Real Poles• When ζ > 1, both poles are
real and distinct:
0,1)(
1
))(()(
1)(
))((
2)(
2111
21
2
21
2
21
2
22
2
tekekpp
ty
spspssY
ssX
psps
sssH
tptpn
n
n
nn
n
• There are two componentsto this response:
)inputsteptodue()(
0,)(
21
2
1121
221
ppty
tekekpp
ty
nss
tptpntr
• When ζ = 1, both poles arereal (s = ωn) and repeated:
0,11)(
1
)()(
1)(
)(
2)(
21
2
21
2
22
2
ttety
spssH
ssX
ps
sssH
tn
n
n
nn
n
n
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 7
Step Response For Two Real Poles (Cont.)
• ζ is referred to as the damping ratio because it controls the time constant of the impulse response (and the time to reach steady state);
• ωn is the natural frequency and controls the frequency of oscillation (which we will see next for the case of two complex poles).
• ζ > 1: The system is considered overdamped because it does not achieve oscillation and simply directly approaches its steady-state value.
• ζ = 1: The system is considered critically damped because it is on the verge of oscillation.
Two Real PolesBoth Real and
Repeated
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 8
Step Response For Two Complex Poles• When 0 < ζ < 1, we have two complex conjugate poles:
• The transfer function can be rewritten as:
22
2
222222
2
22
2
2
2)(
dn
n
nnnn
n
nn
n
s
ss
sssH
• The step response, after some simplification, can be written as:
• Hence, the response of this system eventually settles to a steady-state value of 1. However, the response can overshoot the steady-state value and will oscillate around it, eventually settling in to its final value.
n
dd
t
n
n wherettety n
1tan0,sin1)(
dn
nd
nn
jpp
pp
21
2
221
,
1
1,
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 9
Analysis of the Step Response For Two Complex Poles
• ζ > 1: the overdamped system experiences an exponential rise and decay. Its asymptotic behavior is a decaying exponential.
• ζ = 1: the critically damped system has a fast rise time, and converges to the steady-state value in an exponetial fashion.
• 0 < ζ > 1: the underdamped system oscillates about the steady-state behavior at a frequency of ωd.
• Note that you cannot control the rise time and the oscillation behavior independently!
• What can we conclude about the frequency response of this system?
Impulse Response
Step Response
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 10
Implications in the s-Plane
Several important observations:
• The pole locations are:
• Since the frequencyresponse is computedalong the jω-axis, we can see that the pole islocated at ±ωd.
• The bandwidth of thepole is proportional to the distance from the jω-axis, and is given by ζωn.
• For a fixed ωn, the range 0 < < 1 describes a circle. We will make use of this concept in the next chapter when we discuss control systems.
• What happens if ζ is negative?
dn
nn
j
pp
1, 221
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 11
RC Circuit
• Example: Find the response to asinewave:.
• Solution:
• Again we see the solution is the superposition of a transient and steady-state response.
• The steady-state response could have been found by simply evaluating the Fourier transform at ω0 and applying the magnitude scaling and phase shift to the input signal. Why?
• The Fourier transform is given by:
20
20 )()(cos)(
s
CssXtutCtx
0,tancos)(
)(
/1
/1)(
01022
0
220
20
2
tp
tp
Cke
p
kCpty
sps
kCssY
ps
k
RCs
RCsH
pt
RCj
RCsHeH jes
j
/1
/1)()(
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 12
Summary
• Reviewed stability of CT systems in terms of the location of the poles in the s-plane.
• Demonstrated that an RLC circuit is unconditionally stable.
• Analyzed the properties of the impulse response of a first-order differential equation.
• Analyzed the behavior of stable 2nd-order systems.
• Characterized these systems in terms of three possible behaviors: overdamped, critically-damped, or overdamped.
• Discussed the implications of this in the time and frequency domains.
• Analyzed the response of an RC circuit to a sinewave.
• Next: Frequency response, Bode plots and filters.
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 13
The Routh-Hurwitz Stability Test
• The procedures for determining stability do not require finding the roots of the denominator polynomial, which can be a daunting task for a high-order system (e.g., 32 poles).
• The Routh-Hurwitz stability test is a method of determining stability using simple algebraic operations on the polynomial coefficients. It is best demonstrated through an example.
• Consider:
• Construct the Routh array:
011
1 ...)( asasasasA NN
NN
1
54
1
5414
1
32
1
3212
00
11
022
7533
6422
5311
42
columns2/)1(:odd
columns1)2/(:even
00
00
0
N
NNN
N
NNNNN
N
NNN
N
NNNNN
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
NNNN
a
aaa
a
aaaab
a
aaa
a
aaaab
NN
NN
fs
es
dds
cccs
bbbs
aaas
aaas
Number of sign changes in 1st column = number of poles in the RHPRLC circuit is always stable
EE 3512: Lecture 28, Slide 14
Routh-Hurwitz Examples
• Example: 012)( asassA
0)0)(1(
0
1
01
010
11
02
aa
aas
as
as
unstablepolesRHP2changessigntwo0and0if
unstablepoleRHP1changesignone0and0if
unstablepoleRHP1changesignone0and0if
01
01
01
aa
aa
aa
• Example: 012
23)( asasassA
0
0)1(
1
00
2
01
2
0121
022
13
asa
aa
a
aaas
aas
as
unstablepolesRHP2changessigntwo0and0if 02 aa