observatory of automated metros -...

OBSERVATORY OF AUTOMATED METROS2013 data and activities

Observatory of Automated Metros

The Observatory is formed by the main UITP references with Automated Lines

From pioneering experiences to the most recent ones

Systems with multiple technological solutions & transport capacity

Global cultural diversity: Europe, Asia, Middle East, America…

Different profiles

Vancouver

Hong KongDubai

Barcelona

Singapore

Lille

Paris

Rennes

LyonLausanne

Copenhagen

Nuremberg

São Paulo

Rome

THE OBSERVATORY


City

M.DK The Metro Company-Metroselskabet I/S Copenhagen

RTA Roads & Transport Authority Dubai

MTR Mtr Corporation Ltd. Hong Kong

TL Transports publics de la region Lausannoise Lausanne

KEOLIS Keolis Lyon / Lille / Rennes

VAG Verkehrs Aktiengesellschaft Nürnberg Nuremberg

RATP Regie Autonome des transports parisiens Paris

ATAC SpA Agenzia del trasporto autoferrotranviario del Comune di Roma Roma

CCR Companhia de concessoes rodoviarias São Paulo

LTA Land Transport Authority Singapore

BCRTC British Columbia Rapid Transit Company Ltd. Vancouver

ALSTOM Alstom Industry Committee

TMB Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona Barcelona

Company

The Observatory represents a significant part of the UTO km in service in the world

THE OBSERVATORY


The Observatory MISSION is to disseminate and share the most current

and relevant knowledge about automated metro lines with a cross-

cutting approach to all business perspectives

Monitoring

DisseminationStudy

THE OBSERVATORY


Type of train operation

Setting train in motion

Stopping train Door closureOperation in

event of disruption

Grade of Automation

GoA 1ATP with

driver

ATP / ATO with driver

Driver

Automatic

Driver

Automatic

Driver Driver

Driver DriverGoA 2

GoA 3 Driverless Automatic AutomaticTrain

attendantTrain

attendant

Driverless, unattended

Automatic Automatic Automatic AutomaticGoA 4




event of disruption

Grade of Automation

GoA 1ATP with

driver


Driver

Automatic

Driver

Automatic

Driver Driver

Driver DriverGoA 2


attendantTrain

attendant






event of disruption

Grade of Automation

GoA 1ATP with

driver


Driver

Automatic

Driver

Automatic

Driver Driver

Driver DriverGoA 2


attendantTrain

attendant






event of disruption

Grade of Automation

GoA 1ATP with

driver


Driver

Automatic

Driver

Automatic

Driver Driver

Driver DriverGoA 2


attendantTrain

attendant



Grades of automation

According to IEC 62267

WHATAUTOMATION?

The Observatory

focuses on level 4


• Global view of the current situation

on metro automation

• Analysis of the evolution

• Identify trends and major

milestones

The annual world report of automated metros is presented in the Open Seminar

2013 Sept. “Atlas of Automated Metro Lines”

The Atlas is becoming a reference

MONITORING: AUTOMATION

ATLAS


2011 Feb. Management of Unauthorized Presence in Tracks

2011 Nov. Energy Savings in Automated Driving Modes

2013 Mar. The human side of Automated Lines:

Cooperation with the BHRM Commission

2013 Jun. Quick survey: “Attendants on board driverless metros”

2013 Oct. Final report: “Attendants on board driverless metros”

STUDY: OBSERVATORY

REPORTS


• Official launch on 23rd April 2013

• Reference point for all those interested in metro automation,

providing frequent news and up-to-date information

• Exclusive contents for UITP members.

• 2nd phase already on preparation

http://metroautomation.org

2013 Apr. Website of the Observatory of Automated Metros

DISSEMINATION: WEBSITE

The web appears in top 1st position in Google searches for Metro Automation


• Home

• Who we are

• Atlas

• Annual world report

• Automationessentials

• Publications

• Contact

• News

2013 Apr. Observatory webpage

Structure

DISSEMINATION: WEBSITE


• 4th edition

• Location: London

• General vision on automation 4 blocks:

• Strategy

• Operation

• Human

• Technology

• Oriented to Operators and focused on discussion (panels)

• The annual report of the Observatory is presented in the Seminar

• Over 180 participants

UITP Automated Metro Seminars

DISSEMINATION: SEMINARS


THE ATLAS2013


Unattended Train Operation (UTO): Only metro

lines without staff on board are considered

Public transport service: Private lines have been

discarded (airport services, people movers, …)

Minimum train capacity required: More than 100

passengers/train.

a

Selection criteria applied in the Atlas:

THE ATLAS2013


THE ATLAS2013


Asia Europe North America

Middle East South America

40%

32%

19%12%

1%

THE ATLAS2013

UTO % of km per world region


0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

19

%

12

%

12

%

THE ATLAS2013

UTO % of km per country


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Du

bai

Van

cou

ver

Sin

gap

ore

Lille

Bu

san

Pari

s

Ku

ala

Lum

pu

r

Tou

lou

se

Taip

ei

Toky

o

Co

pen

hag

en

Nu

rem

ber

g

Seo

ul

Yon

gin

Ko

be

Bre

scia

Tori

no

New

Yo

rk

Lyo

n

Uije

on

gbu

Yoko

ham

a

Bar

celo

na

São

Pau

lo

Nag

oya

(A

ich

i)

Ren

nes

Osa

ka

Las

Veg

as

Mia

mi

Lau

san

ne

Det

roit

Mila

no

Ho

ng

Ko

ng

80 Dubai

68 Vancouver

61 Singapore

THE ATLAS2013

UTO km per city


THE ATLAS2013

UTO lines length (in km)


-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

LIL

L2SI

N C

CL

PAR

L1

TOR

L1

TOU

L.B

TOU

L.A

NU

E U

2SI

N N

ELLY

N L

.DLS

N M

2LI

L L1

BR

ES M

etro

bs

RN

S L.

AB

CN

L9

/10

CP

H M

1/M

2B

US

L4N

UE

U3

VN

C C

anad

a L.

PAR

L1

4M

LN L

5D

UB

Gre

en

L.

SEO

SB

LSP

L4

KLP

Kel

ana

Jaya

DU

B R

ed L

.V

NC

Exp

o L

.V

NC

Mill

eniu

m L

.TA

I Wen

hu

L.

BU

S B

usa

n-G

imh

aeM

IA M

etro

mo

ver

TOK

New

Tra

nsi

tU

IJ U

L.

YON

Eve

rlin

eSI

N B

uki

t Pa

nja

nYK

H K

anaz

awa

L.D

ET D

PM

TOK

Nip

po

ri-T

on

eri

KOB

Po

rt L

iner

NY

Air

trai

n J

FKO

SK N

ew T

ram

NA

G L

inim

oLV

G L

as V

egas

MR

KOB

Ro

kko

Lin

erD

UB

Pal

mPA

R O

rlyv

alH

KG D

RL

THE ATLAS2013 Constructive models:

underground vs elevated (#stations)


THE ATLAS2013 Line capacity: passengers/train

(% of km)


THE ATLAS2013 Newcomers

(2012-2013 new lines)


0

50

100

150

200

250

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

+50%

+26%

+24%

Medium

SmallBig

< 300 pax/train

300-700 pax/train

> 700 pax/train

THE ATLAS:TRENDS Capacity:

Passengers/train (as a % of last decade new km)


0

50

100

150

200

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

+51%

+34%

+15%

Inductive Loop

RF free propagation

Inductive

Wave

Radio

Signaling:Current share of Inductive loops / Radio / µWave

THE ATLAS:TRENDS


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

+ 86%

+ 14%

PSD

Detectors

Platform Screen Doors

Intrusion Detectors

THE ATLAS:TRENDS Track protection systems:

PSD vs Intrusion Detection Systems (as % of last decade new stations)


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

+ 69%

+ 2%

Steel Wheel

Mag Lev

Steel Wheel

Rubber tyred

Rubber-tyred+ 29%

THE ATLAS:TRENDS Wheel systems:

Rubber vs Steel(as % of last decade new km)


0

50

100

150

200

250

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

+ 55%

+ 45%

underground

elevated

Underground

Elevated

THE ATLAS:TRENDS Constructive model:

Elevated vs Underground(as % of last decade new stations)


THE ATLAS:TRENDS Conversions:

High potential, few realities


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

20

13

20

15

20

17

20

19

20

21

20

23

20

25

Exponential growth!

1x

6x

THE ATLAS:PROJECTIONS


Exponential growth! relative to previous decade

0

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

1750

2000

1990 2000 2010 2020

x 2

x 2.5

x 3.5

THE ATLAS:PROJECTIONS


Busan

Lausanne

TorinoBrescia

674 km

A proven reality: 2000-Today

Lille

Vancouver

Osaka

Yokohama

Lyon

Paris

Tokyo

Taipei

Kuala Lumpur

Singapore

ToulouseBarcelona

Copenhagen

NurembergRennes

Nagoya

Hong Kong

Las Vegas Kobe

Dubai

São Paulo

Seoul

New York

Detroit

Miami

Milano

Uijeongbu

Yongin


674 km

Exponential Growth! 2014-2025

future 1888 km


Australia North America

South America

Middle East Asia Europe

37%

27%

21%

4%

10%2%

THE ATLAS:PROJECTIONS Growth distribution

(% of new km 2014-2025)


Australia South America

North America

Middle East Asia Europe

35%32%

17%

8%7%1%

THE ATLAS:PROJECTIONS Growth distribution

UTO km% per world region in 2025


THE ATLAS:CONCLUSION


A bright future for metro automationThank you!

LausanneBrescia

Milano

Lyon

Paris

Singapore

Taipei

Kuala Lumpur

Barcelona

Rennes

Copenhagen

Toulouse

Dubai

São Paulo

Seoul

Brussels Helsinki

Honolulu

IncheonIstanbul

Macau

Manaus

Budapest

Riyadh

Rome

Santiago de Chile

Sidney

Thessaloniki

Vancouver

New York

Miami

Detroit

Lille

Hong Kong

KobeBusan

SeoulUijeongbu

Yongin

Osaka

Yokohama

Tokyo

Nagoya

Nuremberg

Torino

www.metroautomation.org

observatory of automated metros -...

Documents