ochoa s problem enlightened

4
Ochoa’s Problem Enlightened By E. A. J. García. Recall Dao’s Eyeballing a Ball problem. In this case the segments IJ, GH are not necessarily congruent to those segments corresponding to the Praying Eyes Theorem. So, one would ask: when segments IJ, GH are equal to those of the Praying Eyes Theorem? Well, Ochoa has answered the question by misunderstanding Dao’s problem. Ochoa’s image #1 In Ochoa’s image at CTK-Facebook, he takes ABD as a triangle being circle centred at C its incircle, which is different to Dao’s configuration. Ochoa also stated that MN equals IJ = GH. Now I will prove that IJ = GH = MN, but I will change the notations.

Upload: n-huai

Post on 07-Sep-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SI PS

TRANSCRIPT

  • Ochoas Problem Enlightened

    By E. A. J. Garca.

    Recall Daos Eyeballing a Ball problem. In this case the segments IJ, GH

    are not necessarily congruent to those segments corresponding to the

    Praying Eyes Theorem. So, one would ask: when segments IJ, GH are

    equal to those of the Praying Eyes Theorem? Well, Ochoa has answered the

    question by misunderstanding Daos problem.

    Ochoas image #1

    In Ochoas image at CTK-Facebook, he takes ABD as a triangle being

    circle centred at C its incircle, which is different to Daos configuration.

    Ochoa also stated that MN equals IJ = GH.

    Now I will prove that IJ = GH = MN, but I will change the notations.

  • Consider two circles (A), (C). From A draw a tangent line to (C) in I. From

    C draw a tangent line to (A) in J. Let E be the intersection of AI and CJ.

    Draw a circle centred at E and tangent to AC in F. Now, from A draw a

    tangent line to (E) in G and from C draw another tangent line to (E) in H.

    Let K be the intersection of AG, CH.

    Let CT IO. TIC = 180 90 JIA = 90 JIA

    TCI = 90 (90 JIA) = JIA = JCA.

    ECF = HCE and CP = CQ CE PQ.

    It follows easily that triangles COI and CPQ are congruent and

    therefore OI = PQ.

    Now I will prove that G, H are on segment IJ.

    Let ACK be a triangle. Let E be the incenter of triangle ACK. Let FGH be

    the intouch triangle of ACK. Let bisector AE intersect circle (CHEF) in I.

    Then it turns out that G, H, I are collinear.

  • Proof:

    AKC = 180 KAC KCA

    KGH = (180 AKC) / 2

    KGH = KAC / 2 + KCA / 2

    AGH = 180 KAC / 2 KCA / 2

    AEC = 180 KAC / 2 KCA / 2

    Hence, AGH = AEC

    Also, EIH = ACE. So, AIG is a triangle and is similar to AEC. Which

    means that H is on GI and therefore, G, H, I are collinear.

    Analogously, G, H, J are collinear and, therefore, G, H are on IJ.

  • MJ = GH [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (A), (E)]

    IO = GH [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (C), (E)]

    MJ = IO [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (A), (C)]

    Summarizing:

    MJ = IO = GH = PQ = RS.

    So now, in order to understand Ochoas image associated to the

    archimedean circles consider the case when semicircles (A), (C) are tangent

    so we get an arbelos. As MJ = IO = GH = PQ = RS and

    MJ = IO = 2RaRc/(Ra + Rc), then, we will have a new triplet of

    archimedean circles.

    Ochoas image #2