ochoa s problem enlightened
DESCRIPTION
SI PSTRANSCRIPT
-
Ochoas Problem Enlightened
By E. A. J. Garca.
Recall Daos Eyeballing a Ball problem. In this case the segments IJ, GH
are not necessarily congruent to those segments corresponding to the
Praying Eyes Theorem. So, one would ask: when segments IJ, GH are
equal to those of the Praying Eyes Theorem? Well, Ochoa has answered the
question by misunderstanding Daos problem.
Ochoas image #1
In Ochoas image at CTK-Facebook, he takes ABD as a triangle being
circle centred at C its incircle, which is different to Daos configuration.
Ochoa also stated that MN equals IJ = GH.
Now I will prove that IJ = GH = MN, but I will change the notations.
-
Consider two circles (A), (C). From A draw a tangent line to (C) in I. From
C draw a tangent line to (A) in J. Let E be the intersection of AI and CJ.
Draw a circle centred at E and tangent to AC in F. Now, from A draw a
tangent line to (E) in G and from C draw another tangent line to (E) in H.
Let K be the intersection of AG, CH.
Let CT IO. TIC = 180 90 JIA = 90 JIA
TCI = 90 (90 JIA) = JIA = JCA.
ECF = HCE and CP = CQ CE PQ.
It follows easily that triangles COI and CPQ are congruent and
therefore OI = PQ.
Now I will prove that G, H are on segment IJ.
Let ACK be a triangle. Let E be the incenter of triangle ACK. Let FGH be
the intouch triangle of ACK. Let bisector AE intersect circle (CHEF) in I.
Then it turns out that G, H, I are collinear.
-
Proof:
AKC = 180 KAC KCA
KGH = (180 AKC) / 2
KGH = KAC / 2 + KCA / 2
AGH = 180 KAC / 2 KCA / 2
AEC = 180 KAC / 2 KCA / 2
Hence, AGH = AEC
Also, EIH = ACE. So, AIG is a triangle and is similar to AEC. Which
means that H is on GI and therefore, G, H, I are collinear.
Analogously, G, H, J are collinear and, therefore, G, H are on IJ.
-
MJ = GH [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (A), (E)]
IO = GH [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (C), (E)]
MJ = IO [Praying Eyes Theorem wrt circles (A), (C)]
Summarizing:
MJ = IO = GH = PQ = RS.
So now, in order to understand Ochoas image associated to the
archimedean circles consider the case when semicircles (A), (C) are tangent
so we get an arbelos. As MJ = IO = GH = PQ = RS and
MJ = IO = 2RaRc/(Ra + Rc), then, we will have a new triplet of
archimedean circles.
Ochoas image #2