october 1, 1987

n o 0 1 9 1*

TECHNICAL PROGRESS SUMMARY FOR DPO GW7956

SPIEGELBERG AND RASMUSSEN DUMP SITES

OCTOBER 1, 1987

IMUS Suite 56920 South Cedar StreetLansing- Micht«in 4891 °517-694-1304

C-34-8-7-22M

October 1, 1987

NUS Project Numbers 8842 and 8843

Ms. Amy Carter, Project Manager

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

StevensT. Mason Building

Post Office Box 30028

Lansing, Michigan 48909

Subject: Technical Progress Summary for DPO GW7956

Spiegelberg and Rasmussen Dump Sites

Dear Ms. Carter:

This summary of technical progress was prepared in response to your letter dated January 12, 1987,

where you defined those items you needed from NUS to close DPO GW7956 and release the 20%

retention. DPO GW79S6 was discontinued on June 30, 1986, after discussions between you, your

colleagues, and I in July, 1986. At that time, we determined that a sufficient number of expansions

had occurred to the scope and schedule of the project that the original DPO GW7956 no longer was

applicable and should be terminated; and that a new DPO/CR should be initiated to complete the

project- Work Plan Modification No. 5, dated July 30, 1986, addressed the termination of the work

for DPO GW7956 and the projected requirements to complete as understood at that time. A

summary of the technical progress, documents generated, and percent of tasks completed (with

respect to entire Rl) with respect to the entire RI/FS is provided below. NUS Invoices for Service

Period July, 1987, indicated that they were the final billings for DPO GW7956. Subsequent to that

billing, your review of invoices (letter dated September 14, 1987) stated that charges eligible for

DPOGW7956 were incorrectly charged to a different DPO, and that these charges should be

1

^5 A Halliburton Company

transferred to DPO 7956. We are presently transferring these charges to DPO GW7956 and you will»

receive an additional invoice for these charges in the near future.

The approved Work Plan, dated December, 1984, contained the following thirteen technical tasksfortheRI/FS:

TASK 1.0 Initial ActivitiesTASK 1.1 Work Plan PreparationTASK 1 .2 Description of Current Situation

TASK 1 .3 Project Management

TASK 2.0 Pre-lnvestigation Support ActivitiesTASK 2.1 Topographic Mapping, Ground Surveying, and Warning Signs

TASK 2.2 Health, Safety and General Site ReconnaissanceTASK 2.3 Site Health and Safety PlanTASK 2.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

TASK 2.5 Site Operations PlanTASK 2.6 Mobilization of Field Equipment

TASK 2. 7 Subcontractor ManagementTASK 2.8 Preliminary Identification of Remedial Technologies

TASK 3.0 Site InvestigationTASK 3.1 Air Quality AnalysisTASK 3.2 Geophysical InvestigationsTASK 3.3 Hydrogeological Investigation

TASK 3.4 Environmental SamplingTASK 3.5 Field Monitoring

TASK 4.0 Site Data EvaluationTASK 4.1 Data Validation, Reduction, and Evaluation

TASK 4.2 Public Health and Environmental Risk Assessment

5.0 Remedial Investigation

TASK 6.0 Description of Current Situation and Scope Refinement

NUS CORPORATION

TASK 7.0 Development of Alternatives

TASK 8.0 Initial Screening of AlternativesTASK 9.0 Laboratory Work Plan Preparation

TASK 10.0 Remedial Alternatives Evaluation and Preliminary Feasibility Study ReportPreparation

TASK 11.0 Selection of Cost Effective Alternative

TASK 12.0 Conceptual Design Development

TASK 13.0 Final Report

The following paragraphs describe the general technical progress for each of these tasks at the timeof termination of DPO GW7956.

TASK 1.0 INITIAL ACTIVITIES

TASK 1.1 WORK PLAN PREPARATION

e Summary of Activities

The request for Work Plan was issued by the DNR Project Manager on June 18, 1984; andthe final (approved) Work Plan was issued to DNR on December 5, 1984. Preparation of

the Work Plan required several meetings with DNR at the DNR Lansing office. One

peculiarity of the project schedule was that the drilling for the R! was planned to bephased around a drum removal, Initial Remedial Measure (IRM) to be performed by U.S.

EPA on the Rasmussen Dump Site.

Expansions in the scope of work defined in the final Work Plan required preparation of

five work plan modifications for work performed under DPO GW7956. in addition, several

additions and deletions to approved staff for the project were made m writing, to DNR.Numerous minor adjustments to the scope of work were required that were not

significant enough to cost-effectively prepare formal Work Plan modifications but

collectively contributed to increased level of effort, cost, and schedule. The small

NUS COPPORATICN

modifications were always performed with the knowledge and concurrence of the DNRproject manager; and, Work Plan modifications were prepared at appropriate times to

accommodate the changes.

•• Documents Prepared

- First Draft Work Plan, July 20,1984

Revisions to Work Plan (letter), August 9 and 17, 1984

- Second Draft Work Plan, September 19,1984

- Final Work Plan, Decembers, 1984 -

Work Plan Modification No. 1, Test Pit investigation for Waste Characterization,

June, 1985

Work Plan Modification No. 2, Phase 2 Drilling - Additional Drilling for Plume

Identification in the Upper Aquifer, June 10, 1985

Work Plan Modification No. 3, Phase 3, Drilling and Monitoring Well Installations,

August 16, 1985/Rev. August 28, 1985

- Work Plan Modification No. 4, Phased Feasibility Study, October 21, 1985/Rev.

January 29, 1986

- Work Plan Modification No. 5, Revision to Scope, Schedule and Budgets for the RI/F5,

July 30,1986 (This modification established end date of DPO GW7956 work as June 30,

1986.)

• Percent Complete - 60% (additional Work Plan Modifications 6, 7, 7a, and 8 required to

completeRI/FS)

NUS CORPCRATiaiM

TASK t .2 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT SITUATION

• Summary of Activities

The primary activity involved reviewing the site data in detail after approval of the Work

Plan. The Work Plan stated that a brief report would be prepared describing the current

situation at the site; however, after the Work Plan was approved, the ONR determinedthat the description in Section 2.0 of the approved Work Plan was sufficient for the sitedescription. Subsequent to that decision, a significantly more detailed description of thecurrent site conditions was prepared and was incorporated into the second version of theQuality Assurance Project Plan, dated August 1985, (Section 3.0, Project Description). Mostof the Level of Effort for preparation of that Section was charged to task 1.2.

TASK 1.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT


Project management was an ongoing task throughout the RI/FS work for DPO GW7956.

• Documents Prepared

• Weekly Reports completed through the end of Ju^e, 1986

• Percent Complete - 60%

TASK 2.0 PRE-INVESTIGATION SUPPORT ACTIVITIES

TASK 2.1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING, GROUND SURVEYING, AND WARNING SIGNS


The Work Plan slated three separate surveying events would be conducted by DNRsurveyors, The first survey was to establish ground control for aerial photography and

property lines for site access requirements. The remaining two surveys were to locate

monitoring wells and sampling points during the Rl. DNR performed the three surveys, as

well as additional surveys for other phases of the project.

NUS

Warning signs were obtained for placement at areas designated by the DNR project

manager. The locations described in the Work Plan were not totally utilized because theland owners requested alternative locations.


Topographic map at 1" a 200' scale and 2' contour interval. The map was updated asadditional wells were installed, (prepared by DNR)

- Warning signs were obtained by the prime subcontractor

• Percent Complete - 80% (Phase 4 drilling locations remained after June, 1986)

TASK 2.2 HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL SITE RECONNAISSANCE


The Work Plan states that the initial site reconnaissance objectives were to: inspect the site

for health and safety, geologic and hydrologic conditions; locate surface sampling points;and conduct air sampling. All objectives were met with the site reconnaissance task except

the air sampling. Continuous monitoring of the air was made using organic vapor meters;however, air sampling was deferred because the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)had to be prepared and approved by U.S. ERA prior to any sampling. Preparation and

approval of the QAPP for Region 5 requirements was a long and arduous process thatwould have significantly delayed the start-up of the project. (Although the Superfundprogram was five years old and Region 5 was using a QAPP guidance developed in 1980,

Region 5 had only one approved QAPP for their entire remedial program, as of summer,

1985, according to an individual in the Region 5 Central Regional Laboratory who was

involved with the Superfund program.)

• Documents Prepared - None Required

• Percent Complete- 100%

NUS

TASK 2.3 SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN


The Site Health and Safety Plan was developed as specified in the approved Work Plan,

using the Health and Safety Plan developed by the State. The Plan was updated forvarious major field activities as those activities were identified and implemented.


e Percent Complete - 95% (Updated task plans for Phase 4 drilling and drilling fluid drumssampling/removal were required after June, 1986.)

TASK 2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PLAN


The Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan (QA/QC Plan) was prepared under a

different DPO and was not a task under DPO GW7956. The first QA/QC Plan prepared

under a different DPO was in accordance to the format successfully used by NUS forSuperfund RI/FS projects in EPA Zone 1 (NUS was the REM/FIT contractor to U.S. EPA for all

of Zone 1 from October, 1982, through October, 1986). The format was acceptable to theState, but rejected by U. S. EPA Region 5. This resulted in extensive revisions and additionsto the Plan that added considerable time and expense to the effort (the original QA/QCPlan was prepared for about $5400, and the final QAPP cost about $30,000).

A significant amount of the work for preparing the revised QAPP was considered actualimplementation of quality procedures, particularly since the preparation of the document

was contemporaneous with much of the work being performed for the RI/FS. Therefore,QAPP implerrenta*iop was incorporated into the task under DPO GW7956, as explained

and documented in a letter to the State entitled "Summary of the Scope and Costs for

QAPP Development and Implementation", dated December 4, 1985. In addition, several

amendments to the QAPP were performed, primarily to modify field analyt ical

procedures.

NUS COPPGPATIGN


Quality Assurance Project Plan, dated July, 1984

Quality Assurance Project Plan, dated August, 1985QAPP Amendments

• Percent Complete - 90% (Update on sampling numbers, matricies and analysis needed forPhase 4 drilling and PRP oversight activities, complete the RI/FS.)

TASK 2.5 SITE OPERATIONS PLAN


The Site Operations Plan (SOP) was defined as a reference guide in the field that wouldconsist of the Health and Saftty, Quality Assurance, and Work Plans. The documents weremaintained in the field office trailer during the field operations.


The SOP was a compended group of Ptans and maps prepared under other various tasks.

• Percent Complete - 90% (Phas« IV fieldwork remained after June, 1986.)

TASK 2.6 MOBILIZATION OF FIELD EQUIPMENT


The initial field mobilization began on November 11, 1984, and continued for severalweeks as field work was initiated. Items included in the mobilization included installation

of the field gas chromatograph in the DNR office trailer, procurement of a storage trailer,

construction of the decontamination pad and appurtenant facilities, construction of the

Spiegelberg Site access ramp and cable-gate. The initial mobilization was conducted

concurrently with the U.S. EPA drum removal IRM, and the EPA contractor (OH Materials,

Inc.) used the decontamination facility as pan of their operation.

NUS CORPCSATIGN

The Work Plan stated that a fence with gates would be installed around the control area,

and around the area designated for drum storage. NUS and the State decided that

installation of the fence enclosure during EPA IRM activities would be impractical, andthat only a fence and gate across the Rasmussen access road to the o f f i cetrailer/decontamination area was installed. After completion of the IRM, NUS and the

State reassessed the necessity for tht fence enclosure as defined in the Work Plan, and thedecision was made that the fence installed at the entrance of the access road, and thecable-gate on the access ramp bttwten the Spiegetberg and Rasmussen properties wouldbe sufficient for site security.

The site was demobilized in May 23, 1986, with the removal of the DNR office trailer. TheRl had experienced several expansions in scope that caused several more mobilizations offield equipment and drillers than anticipated in the Work Plan. For example, the soil gasand surface/shallow subsurface soil sampling tasks were initiated in December, 1984, at atime when the ground had frozen and could not be penetrated using hand operateddrilling tools. NUS and the State decided to mobilize the drilling subcontractor to drill

through the frozen ground so that the soil sampling could proceed without furtherdelaying the Rl.

• Percent Complete - 90% (Phase 4 drilling; Final Drum Removal)

TASK 2.7 SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

* Summary of Activities

Subcontractor management of prime subcontractor, EDI Science and Engineering until" • ' " / •

June 15, 1986, when they discontinued work on the project. Subcontractor management

of A 4 B Industrial Services occurred for the test pit operations.

Percent Complete-80% (Phase 4 drilling and drum removal remained after June, 1986.)

NUS CORPORATION

TASK 2.8 PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES


The purpose of this task, as defined in the Work Plan, was to maintain the focus of the Rl

on the objectives of the FS. This focus was maintained throughout the Rl, and was the

primary reason that the numerous Work Plan Modifications were required, since most ofthe modifications increased the scope of various tasks to assure sufficient information was

obtained for the Risk Assessment or the FS. For example, Work Plan Modification No. 1 fortest pits in waste areas was recommended to evaluate the exact character wastes in areas

detected by geophysics and soil gas so that excavation and disposal alternatives could bebetter addressed in the FS. Likewise, Work Plan Modification Nos. 2 and 3 were to expand

the drilling program so that groundwater contamination could be better defined for

remediation considerations.

The length of the project spanned a period of time when new guidance, and

implementation of new guidance for Feasibility Studies were occurring, changing the data

requirements for the M. Where possible, adjustments and modifications were made to

address the guidance for FS Studies.

TASK 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATIONS

TASK 3.1 AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS


The air quality analysis was scheduled to be conducted during the initial site

reconnaissance, but was delayed because the QAPP had to be approved by U.S. EPA prior

to sampling, and Region 5 normally required several months (or longer) to process these

documents. The air quality investigation was performed on July 1-2, 1985. The results

indicated that air quality is not a serious problem at these sites, under the site conditions

that existed the days of the sampling.

10NUS

• Documents Prepared»

Technical Memorandum on Air Sampling at Spiegelberg and Rasmussen Dump Sites,dated January 28, 1986


TASK 3.2 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS


The Work Plan identified use of electrical resistivity and EM conductivity, magneticgradiometer, and borehole (gamma and resistivity) geophysics. Each of these techniques

were used at the site, as well as a radar survey conducted by the State on the SpiegelbergSite. The electrical resistivity was the least used method since the EM conductivity proved

to be more valuable and is quicker and less costly to operate. The most useful techniqueswere the gradiometer and borehole geophysics.

The initial geophysical surveys were conducted during the week of November 27, 1984,

with electrical resistivity and EM conductivity. The surveys were initiated to test the

methods abilities to delineate wastes, geology, and contaminant plumes. The resultsindicated that the EM. conductivity and magnetometer should be used to delineate

wastes, and possibly assist with defining the geology.

The Work Plan stated that the geophysical surveys would be conducted in two phases, one

before and one after the EPA IRM operations. Since the IRM was conducted before any

geophysical surveys, both phases were conducted at the same time. The Work Planspecified that magnetometer surveys would only be performed on the Rasmussen Dump

Site; however, the resistivity and conductivity survey conducted on the Spiegelberg Site

indicated that buried metal may occur in the paint sludge disposal area, so the

magnetometer task was expanded to incorporate the Spiegelberg Site paint sludge area.The Work Plan also specified that only the top of the Rasmussen landfill area would be

-yj.rveyed with resistivity, conductivity, and magnetometer; however, visual site

reconnaissance indicated that buried materials may occur in the pit area df the Rasmussen

Dump Site, and the geophysical surveys were extended into this area.

11NUS

The geophysical surveys conducted on both sites indicated the presence of buried wastes,

possibly metal, in the Spiegelberg paint sludge area; selected areas of the top of the

Rasmussen landfill; small portions of the Rasmussen gravel pit; and isolated areas in theberm on the Rasmussen property that parallels the west property line adjacent to theSpiegelberg gravel pit.

The gradiometer was also used later in the investigation to check drilling locations where

the possibility of buried materials could occur that could be dangerous if encountered bythe drill.

The State conducted a radar survey on January 3^-31, 1985, on several areas on theSpiegelberg Site. The radar surveys were made near the 'pole barn' to check for buriedtrenches; at the 'wood pile' area to check for buried materials; and the 'paint sludge'

disposal area to check the depth and for buried drums. The radar survey concluded thatno buried trenches were discernable near the pole barn; several potential areas occur inthe wood pile area where trenching or natural erosion and backfilling with 'structureless'material occurred, or areas where electrolyte leached into the subsoil occur. The radarsurvey in the paint sludge area was not successful because of the high conductivity of thesurface materials, and no conclusions were made by the State geophysicist

e Documents Prepared

Technical Memorandum - Surface Geophysical Surveys, submission date,

August 23, 1985

- Memo - Radar Survey, dated February 13, 1985 (prepared by State)

• Percent Complete -100%

TASK 3.3 HYPROG^O'OGICAL INVESTIGATION


The approved Work Plan, and Quality Assurance Project Plan provided for a step-wise

approach for locating sources and pathways of groundwater contamination, with efforts

concentrated mainly in the gravel pit areas on both sites. The step-wise approach included

12NLJS CORPORATION

thirty hand-auger soil samplings, soil gas testing, subsurface soil sampling from tenhollow-stem auger borings, and installing ten to thirteen monitoring wells about ten feet

below the water table. In addition to locating source of groundwater contamination,

about six deep monitoring wells were to be drilled across both sites to characterize thesubsurface geology and hydrogeology that may effect groundwater flow beneath thesite.

The Remedial Investigation required three phases of drilling and well installations prior tothe end of June, 1986. A fourth phase of drilling and well installations was requiredsubsequent to June, 1986, but was not part of the DPO GW7956 activities.

The hydrogeological investigation was initiated in late November, 1984. The

hydrogeologic investigation was initiated at about the same time as the U.S. ERAImmediate Removal operations of waste drums on the Rasmussen Dump Site. Sitemobilization involved installation of the office, storage and decontamination trailers; and

the electrical and phone services on the Rasmussen Dump Site. A decontamination padand facility were constructed on the Rasmussen Dump Site. The facilities on theRasmussen Dump Site wert used for field operations on both sites throughout theduration of the first three phases of field work.

The first phase of field work immediately encountered problems due to the weather. An

intense rain followed by freezing temperatures caused the ground to freeze excessivelydeep, and hard. The ground was impenetrable by hand-auger or hand-held drills and thedriller had to be mobilized to provide the shallow soil samples and the soil gas holes.

Phase 1 soil gas testing occurred in January and February, 1985. Approximately 78 soil gas

testing locations were tested; with 30 on the Rasmussen Dump Site and 48 on theSpiegelberg Site during Phase 1. In addition, thirty soil gas samples were obtained in a

concentrated area around monitoring well RA-MW-22 in September, 1985.

Surface water and sediment samples were also obtained during Phase 1 field operations,

with four samples of each obtained from the Spiegelberg Site.

Phase 1 surface and shallow subsurface (hand augered) soil samples were obtained forchemical testing for contamination after difficulties with frozen ground were overcome inFebruary, 1985. Surface soils and subsurface soils were obtained on the Rasmussen Dump

13NUS CORPORATION

Site and Spicgelberg Site during these field operations. In addition four samples of gravel

from two gravel stockpiles were obtained for analysis; two from a stockpile on the

Rasmussen Dump Site and two from a stockpile on the Spiegelberg Site.

As the hydrogcological investigation progressed, the complexity of the subsurfacegeology became apparent, and tht need for additional borings and wells was recognizedand accommodated through adjustments to the number, location, and depths ofmonitoring wells as the investigation progressed. These adjustments were documented inWork Plan Modifications.

Phase 1 of the drilling and wtll installations occurred from January, 1985, through March1985. A total of 21 wells wtre installed, with five wells installed using auger/cable-toolmethods; two wells installed using cable-tool methods only; and 14 wells installed withhollow-stem augers. Nine welts were installed on the Rasmussen Dump Site and twelve

wells were installed on the Spiegelberg Site. Phase I well drilling and installation data aresummarized on Table la.

Phase 1 also involved drilling sixteen borings, with no wells, to depths of approximatelyten feet, to obtain soil samples for chemical analyses in areas where contamination wasdetected or suspected by surface soil sampling, or soil gas testing, or geophysics. Nineborings were installed on the Spiegelberg Site and seven borings on the Rasmussen DumpSite for these purposes. Tablt 2 summarizes the soil boring information.

Phase 2 drilling and well installations were performed in June and July, 1985, based on theresults of Phase 1 that indicated two distinct aquifers existed beneath both sites, and that

several contaminated plumes may exist within the upper and lower aquifers. The purpose

of Phase 2 was to better define the plume or plumes in the upper aquifer, and to betterdelineate the dip on the surface of the aquitard (clay layer) separating the aquifers sincethe dtp may have controlled, in part, migration of heavy liquid contaminates along thebase of the upper aquifer. The possibility of additional drilling into the lower aquifer wasrecognized at this time, but determination of conditions in the upper aquifer was required

before further recommendations for the lower aquifer could be made. Phase 2 drillingand well installations consisted of nine wells using hollow-stem augers. Seven wells were

installed on the Rasmussen Dump Site and two wells were installed on the Spiegelberg

Site. Phase II drilling and well installation data are summarized on Table ib.

14NUS CORPORATION

Phase 3 drilling and well installations occurred from September to October, 1985.. Thepurpose of Phase 3 was to determine the groundwater flow and contamination conditions

in the lower aquifer, beneath the aquitard (clay layer). Nine wells were installed usingrotary and/or cable-tool drilling methods, into the lower aquifer. Four wells were installed

on the Rasmussen Dump Site and five wells were installed on the Spiegelberg Site. Table1c summarizes the-drilling and monitoring well data for Phase III.

In summary, a total of 39 borings, of which 34 had permanent wells, were installed for thethree phases of drilling. In addition, 16 soil borings were installed to test for soilcontamination (seven on Rasmussen Dump Site; and nine on the Spiegelberg Site.)

During the well drilling operations, subsurface soil samples were taken at 5 to 10 footintervals in the borings for classification purposes and visual evaluation of relativepermeability; and, groundwater samples were taken using temporary wells at about 10foot intervals in the borings for field screening analysis to assist in determining the depth

that the well screens should be set Borehole geophysical logs (natural gamma) weretaken in most wells to assist in classifying the soil types in vertical profile. In addition, insitu permeability tests were conducted in each well to determine the hydraulicconductivity characteristics of the aquifers. Weds which were gamma logged and testedfor permeability are indicated on Tables la, 1b, and 1c.

In addition to the Work Plan items originally scheduled for this task, a Test Pit investigation wasundertaken when the geophysical data indicated potentially buried wastes at locations on both the

Rasmussen and Spiegelberg sites. A total of 17 test pits were excavated using a large, tread-mounted backhoe. Two test pits were excavated in the paint sludge disposal area on the

Spiegelberg site. Additional test pits were planned on the site, however, the landowner forced

discontinuance of the test pit operation prior to completion. Fifteen test pits were excavated on the

Rasmussen sitt: two in the berm between the properties; one in the disposal area discovered in thebase of the gravel pit; one at the north boundary of the gravel pit; three in the buried drum area onthe northeast part of the municipal landfill; seven on the top of the municipal landfill; and, one in

the south facing slope below the municipal landfill.

Surveying locations and elevations of monitoring welts was provided by Michigan DNR surveyors.

Borings without wells, test pits, and surface/shallow subsurface soil sampling locations were notsurveyed, but were approximated on the topographic base map of the site by sampling personnel.

15NUS CORPORATION

• Documents prepared

hBoring Logs (prepared by EDI and NUS)

Gamma ray (Geophysical) logs (prepared by EDI)In situ permeability logs (prepared by EDI)

Phase 1,2, and 3 Technical Memorandum (prepared by EDI)

Test Pit Memorandum

Soil Gas Testing Around Well RA-MW-22 Memorandum, May 22,1986In situ Permeability Testing Memorandum (prepared by EDI)

Workman Mod. No. 1, Test Pit Investigation for Waste Characterization, June, 1985

Work Plan Mod. NO. 3, Phase 3 Drilling and Monitoring Well Installations, August, 1985Letter - Drilling Modifications for Boring 43, October, 1985

• Percent Complete -75% (Phase IV drilling and PRP oversight remained after June, 1985.)

TASK 3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING


The Environmental Sampling task included the sampling of soils, sediment, surface water,and groundwater. Soil samples included those collected from the surface and shallow

subsurface using hand augers; those collected from split-barrel (spoon) sampling ofsubsurface soils during drilling; and those collected as surface 'grab' samples in areas ofsuspected contamination on both sites. Sediment and surface water samples werecollected from the ponds and wet areas on both sites. Groundwater samples werecollected from existing DNR wells; temporary monitoring wells installed as drilling

proceeded; and, permanent monitoring wells installed on both sites.

Th« number of samples, and types of analysis increased as the investigation proceeded

because of the complexity of both sites. Table 3 presents the summary of the totalestimated number of samples for each media (soil gas, soil, sediment, surface water, andgroundwater) with respect to type of analysis, as estimated in the approved Work Plan

__ (jOecember, 1984), the approved QAPP (August, 1986) and the actual amounts through the

end of June, 1986. Table 3 demonstrates the required increase in number of samples and

types of analysis required to achieve the goals of the investigation. Tables 4a through 4h

(Spiegelberg Site Samples) and Tables 5a through 5h (Rasmussen Dump Site Samples)

16NUS CORPORATION

provide a detailed breakdown of the samples by media, fiefcTnumber, type of analysis, and

date sampled.


Air Sampling Technical Memorandum, January 28, 1986

QA/QC required tracking forms (traffic reports, chain-of-custody)

Field notebook documentation of sample numbers for samples analyzed by field of otherlaboratories ^

Boring logs for documentation of soils and temporary well samples obtained during

drilling but not analyzed by field or other laboratory

• Percent Compfete - 75% (Phase IV drilling and oversight of PRP test trenching remainedafter June, 1985.)

TASK 3.5 FIELD MONITORING

Field monitoring involved tht monitoring of the breathing space during filed operationsto ensure that the health and safety requirements of the project were maintained.


>!

No formal documents required.

e Percent Complete -75% (Phase IV drilling remained to be completed after June, 1985.)

TASK 4.0 SITE DATA EVALUATION (Subtasks 4.1 and 4.2)


The site data evaluation task is subdivided into two major subtasks: Subtask 4.1 - Data

Validation, Reduction and Evaluation; and, Subtask 4.2 - Public Health and RiskAssessment. Data validation was completed for laboratory analysis of samples collected

17NLJS CORPORATION

prior to June, 1986. Data validation reports have been transmitted to the DNR projectmanager.

Subtask 4.2 (Public Health and Risk Assessment) was not completed under OPO GW7956

because changes in the scope and schedule of the project necessarily delayed the initiationof the risk assessment beyond the end of June, 1986. The scope of work for the Remedial

Investigation, which requires completion prior to initiating the Risk Assessment,significantly increased to obtain the basic information necessary to perform a Risk

Assessment and Feasibility Study. (A Risk Assessment was performed of the Spiegelberg

Site Paint Sludge Area Operable Unit under a different DPO/CR number when NUS, DNRand EPA identified the area an as operable unit.)

Subtask 4.1 (Data Validation. Reduction, and Evaluation) the Work Pfan lists a number of

methods and techniques that are to be incorporated into the Remedial Investigation. Theincreases in the scope and schedule of the investigation did not allow the completion ofmost of these listed items; however, many of them were in progress. A number of field

activities were anticipated beyond the end of June, 1986, (e.g. Phase 4 Drilling) so dataevaluations and products (e.g. maps, tables, geological cross-sections) were not complete,and in preliminary draft stages. A status for each of the listed items is as follows:

Chemical data validation was partially complete for samples collected prior to the endof June, 1986.

Chemical data from the field screening, CLP laboratories and NUS laboratory were

entered into computer data bases (field screening, DNR data, NUS laboratory data are

on Lotus 1-2-3; CLP laboratory data and several groundwater samples run by NUS

laboratory are on R base 5000 data base).

The location, relative thickness, and general character of the waste areas on both sites

had been identified, and divided into preliminary operable units, under this DPO. Theoperable units were described in the November, 1986, Draft Phased Feasibility Study

which was prepared under a different DPO/CR.

Preliminary draft "topographic maps were prepared showing the sample locations,

sample number, sample date, and organic compounds that passed validation for

surface soils, sediments, and subsurface soils for both sites.

18NUS CORPORATION

Worksheets for geological cross-sections were prepared, but not completed, pendingthe results of Phase 4 drilling.

Worksheets for ground water flow in both the upper and lower aquifers wereprepared but not complete pending the results of Phase 4 Drilling.

Isoconcentration maps of groundwater contamination were not prepared as of theend of June, 1986, because the field investigation was not complete; however,

preliminary draft topographic maps showing well locations, and analytical results fororganic constituents, passing validation were prepared, and utilized for dataevaluation.

The quantity of groundwater recharge through the waste materials was analytically

estimated under this DPO, and provided in the November, 1985, Phased FeasibilityStudy that was prepared under a different OPO/CR.

Air quality data obtained at both sites was summarized in tables, and locationsprovided on maps in the technical memorandum for the air sapling investigation.

Potential receptors wert tentatively identified, although final identification waspending the results of additional drilling. No formal documents were preparedregarding the potential groundwater receptors; however, the areas of concern wereidentified during the investigation, and formally defined in a letter to the ONRmanager, dated September, 11,1986.

The data evaluation task, as defined in the Work Plan, was also to identify 'gaps' in thedata-for potential further investigation. Identification of data gaps upon completion of

the Remedial Investigation was a formal element of the Remedial Investigation/FeasibilityStudy process because of the way in which Superfund projects were implemented at thattime in the program. In practice, the data gaps were identified as the data was acquired

and reviewed during the investigation, and adjustments were made through Work Plan

Modifications 1 through 5.

19NUS CORPORATION


No formal documents were required for this task; however, numerous technicalworksheets, maps, tables, and other 'internal use' documents were prepared and utilizedin meetings with the ONR and EPA.

e Percent complete - 75% (Phase IV drilling and PRP oversight activities remained afterJune, 1985.)

TASK 5.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT


No Remedial Investigation report was initiated prior to June, 1986, because increases in

scope and schedule of the project left a significant amount of field work to be performedafter that date.


TASKS 6THROUGH13 (FEASIBILITY STUDY)

The Feasibility Study was initiated under this ^PO \vhan the operable units were identifiedfor both sites. DNR and EPA requested that NUS prepare a Phased Feasibility Study (PFS)for the operable units on both sites in October, 1985. The scope of the PFS was modified inJanuary, 1986, to only include an area on the Spiegelberg Site since the presence ofdioxins/dibenzofurans was discovered on the Rasmussen site, delaying the evaluation ofthe operable units pending further field sampling and analysis. Most of the workperformed for the PFS was conducted under a different DPO/CR; however, it was

recognized that certain elements of work for the PFS would be the same for the FeasibilityStudy, so a part of the I evel-of -effort approved for the Feasibility Study in DPO GW7956was used for the PFS, as explained in Work Plan Modification No. 4. A general increase inthe scope of the feasibility studies for both sites was recognized as the complexity of thesites was learned during the course of the investigation, and general requirements forfeasibility studies changed in the Superfund Program. Additional level of effort and

budget allocations for completing a feasibility study were requested and approved in

Work Plan Modifications Nos. 5 and 8.

20NUS


No formal Feasibility Study documents were submitted under DPO GW7956; however, a

portion of the work for the two PFS reports that were submitted (November, 1985; May,1986) was performed under tht level-of-effort and budget of DPO GW7956.

• Percent Complete-10%

TASK 14.0 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

(No additional requirements attributable to this task were made.)

TASK 15.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SUPPORT


DNR conducted all community relations for the project. NUS provided limited support toDNR and EPA for Community Meetings held at various times. The support was mainlyattending the meetings and being available to answer questions when directed to do soby the DNR.


No formal documents required for this task. ~

TASK 16.0 DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE II COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT APPLICATION


NUS did not assist DNR with a Phase II Cooperative Agreement; however, NUS did assist

DNR at various times in meetings with the EPA, and with providing information for DNRs

preparation of various administrative documents and requests.

21NUS CORPORATION

This concludes the summary of activities for DPO GW7956. Work for the Spiegelberg and Rasmussen

Dump Sites Rl/FS continues under DPO/CR GA-7885. If you have any questions, please contact me.

Very truly yours,

George D. GardnerProject Manager

cc: A. BombergerC. Nieland

G. SgroD. Snyder

22NUS CdRPQRATlQN

TABLE 1a

SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL DATA FOR PHASES I. II. AND III


PHASE I

WellNo

SP-5D

SP-12

SP-13

SP-14

SP-15

RA-16

RA-17

RA-18D

SP-19

SP-20D

RA-21

RA-22

Month/YearDrilling

Completed

3/85

2/85

2/85

2/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

4/85

3/85

3/85

SurfaceElevation

(feet MSL)

914

930.4

9376

9336

887.9

903.1

9223

9346

8956

917.2

920.6

9356

TotalDepth

Drilled (ft)

79

75

76.5

72

19

37

51.5

112

20

183.5

50

61.5

Final Screen Depth(ft)

57-61

72-75

73,5-765

69-72

15-18

34-37

47-50

101-105

15-18

72-76

44-47

57-60

DrillingMethod

HSA/CT

HSA

H5A

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA/CT

HSA

HSA/CT

HSA

HSA

IntervalBetween

SoilSamples

(ft)

-

10

10

10

5

5

S

-

5

5 (to 50)

5

5

Insitu (1)Permeability

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Gamma(2)Log

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(1) Insitu permeability tests also performed on existing DNR wells Nos 81-2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10(2) Gamma Logs also performed on nine existing DNR wells Nos 81-2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

PAGE 1 OF 2

TABLE la

SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL DATA FOR PHASES I, II. AND III


PHASE 1

WellNo

RA-23D

SP-24

SP-25D

SP-26

RA-27

RA-28

SP-29D

SP-30D

RA-31D

Month/YearDrilling

Completed

4/85

3/85

4/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

4/85

5/85

SurfaceElevation

(feet MSL)

9330

9229

9273

911.4

911 5

9187

9360

8989

900(2)

TotalDepth

Drilled (ft)

100

66

187

40

41.5

50

40

143

150

Final Screen Depth(ft)

No wellScreen Collasped

63-66

160-163

35-38

32.5-35.5

44-47

--

130-134

69.5-73.5

DrillingMethod

HSA/CT

HSA

HSA/CT

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

CT

CT

IntervalBetween

SoilSamples

(ft)

5 (to 60)

5

5 (to 45)

5

5

5

5

-

-

Insitu (1)Permeability

--

X

X

X

X

X

-X

X

Gamma(2)Log

X

X

X

X

X

X

--X

X

(1) Insitu permeability tests also performed on existing DNR wells Nos. 81-2,3.4,5,6,7,8,9,10(2) Gamma Logs also performed on nine existing DNR wells Nos 81-2,3,4,5,6,7.8,9.10

PAGE 2 OF 2

TABLE 1b

SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL DATA FOR PHASES I, II, AND III


PHASE II .

WellNo

RA 32

RA-33

RA-34

RA-35

RA-36

SP 37

RA-38

RA 39

SP-40

Monti i/YearDrilling

Completed

6/85

6/85

6/85

6/85

6/85

7/85

7/85

7/85

7/85

SurfaceElevation

(feet MSL)

9135

892.7

9220

9058

905.0

927.2

8866

887.1

9140

TotalDepth

Drilled (It)

101

855

102

85

75

100

77

94.4

80

FinalScreen

Depth (ft)

45-47

67-70

97-101

72-75

30-33

54-57

58-61

57-60

72-75

DrillingMethod

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

Temporary Well Sample

IntervalBetween

Well Samples(ft)

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

--

Depth (ft)

(40-90)

(20-70)

(60-100)

(30-70)

'(35-60)

(58-68)

(20-80)

(20-60)

--

InsituPermeability

X

X

X

X

--

X

X

X

GammaLog

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 1c

SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL DATA FOR PHASES I, II, AND III


PHASE III

WenNo

i

RA-41

RA-42

RA-43*

SP-44

SP-45

SP-46

RA-47

SP-48

SP-49

Month/YearDrilling

Completed

9/85

10/85

10/85

10/65

9/85

10/85

10/85

10/85

10/85

SurfaceElevation

(feet MSL)

919

934

930

918

931

952

935

912

913.1

TotalDepth

Drilled (ft)

153

190

110

169

182

199

190

24

161

FinalScreen

Depth (ft)

144-147

163-167

-

158-162

159-163

174-177

149-153

HoleCollaspe

140-144

DrillingMethod

R(to100)/CT

R(to95)/CT

R(TollO)

R (to 50)/CT

CT

CT

R(to 100)/CT

R(to24)

R(to95)/CT

Temporary Well Sample

IntervalBetween

Well Samples(ft)

--

10

-

10

10

10

10

"

10

Depth (ft)

--

(145-185)

-

(80-160)

(80-170)

(100.110,120.145.165.175.

185)

(150-170)

--

(136,147)

InsituPermeability

--

X

--

X

X

--

--

-

Gamma(1)Log

X

X

--

X

X

X

X

»X

R - Rotary Drilling CT = Cable Tool DrillingHSA = Hollow Steel Auger Drilling MSL = Mean Sea LevelY = Yes, Borehole/well was tested or logged N = No, borehole/well was not tested or logged* -- Landowner demanded abandonment of well - no well installed( 1 ) ~ Resistivity loops also performed for wells RA-MW-41,42,44 and SP-MW-44

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 2

SUMMARY OF SOIL BORING DATA(BORINGS WITH NO WELLS)


BORINGNO.

RA-B1

RA-B2

SP-B3

SP-B4

SP-B5

RA-B6

RA-B7

RA-B8

RA-B9

SP-B10

SP-B11

RA-812

5P-B13

SP-B14

SP-B15

SP-B16

MONTH/YEARDRILLED

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

3/85

APPROXIMATESURFACE

ELEVATION(FEETMSU_

920

917

915.2 '

892

923

932

933

910

913

90S

910

938

917

910

890

931

TOTALDEPTH

(FT)

10

10

45

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

9.0

10

10

2.5

to10

DRILLINGMETHOD^)

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

HSA

NUMBER OFSPLIT-BARREL

SOIL SAMPLES'"

4

4

9*

5

4

5*

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

( 1 ) HSA = Hollow stem auger, samples obtained using a split-barrel (spoon) sampler(2) Sampling interval generally 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15... feet below ground surface* Includes one duplicate sample

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLES VERSUS MEDIA(THROUGH JUNE, 1986)

SPIEGELBERG AND RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

MEDIA

SOILS RA

SP

SOIL GAS RA

SP

SEDIMENTS RA

SP

SURFACE WATER RA

SP

GROUNDWATER RA

SP

GRAVEL RA

SP

WASTES RA

SP

TOTALS

HSLVOAs

1180)

55<»

6

6

65

67

2

2

12

8

341

HSLSNA

1181')

55«t

6

6

65

67

2

2

12

8

341

HSLPCBs

145«'>

55(»

6

6

65

67

2

2

12

a368

HSLINORG.

1070

55<»

6

6

65

65

2

2

12

8

328

DIOXINS

7

7

NUS LABANALYSIS

FOR TARGETMETALS

12

4

16

FIELDSCREENING

65<»

68w

60

48

78

103

422

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

18

19

37

(1) Includes 34 soil samples collected with waste samples during test pitting operations(2) Includes 2 soil samples collected with waste samples during test pitting operations(3) Includes 31 soil samples collected from borings(4) Includes 41 soil samples collected from borings

* r 4 r\r

TABLE 4a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SG01

SP-SG-02

SP-SG-03

SP-SG-04

SP-SG-05

SPSG-06

SP-SG-07

SPSG-08

SP-SG-09

SP-SG-10

SP-SG-11

SP-SG-12

SPSG 13

SP-SG-14

SP-SG-15

SPSG- 16

DATESAMPLED

2/14/85

2/14/85

'--

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/13/85

2/14/85

2/14/85

2/12/85

2/12/85

2/12/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

OIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

NR

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

NR = Not Run* = Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 1 OF 4

TABLE 4a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SG-17

SP-SG-1B

SP-SG-19

SP-SG 20

SP-SG-21

SPSG-22

SP-SG-23A

SP-SG-23B

SPSG-24

SP-SG-25

SP-SG 26

SP-SG 27

SP-SG-28

SP-SG 29

SP-SG-30

SP-SG-31

DATESAMPLED

2/12/Bf

2/12/85

2/21/85

2/12/85

2/12/85

2/21/85

2/28/B5

2/12/85

--

2/25/85

2/27/85

2/27/85

2/27/85

2/21/85

2/21/85

2/22/85

HSLVOAs

•

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG. DIOXINS EP

TOXICITY

—— 1-

NUS LABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

NR

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

ONRGEN

CHEMISTRY

NR = Not Run* = Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 2 OF 4

TABLE 4a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMP' ENUMBFR

SP-SG i2

SPSG-33

SP-SG -34

SP-SG- 34A

SP-SG-35

SP-SG-36

SP-SG-37

SP-SG 38

SP-SG-39

SP-SG -40

SP-SG-41

SP-SG 42

SP-SG 43

SP-SG-44

SP-SG 45

SP-SG-46

DATESAMPLED

2/22/85

2/25/85

2/25/85

2/25/85

2/25/85

2/21/85

2/22/85

2/26/85

2/26/85

2/26/85

3/1/85

3/1/85

3/1/85

3/1/85

3/6/85

3/6/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

i

HSLPCBs

•


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

r

NR - Not Run* = Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 3 OF 4

TABLE 4a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SG-47

SP-SG-48

DATESAMPLED

3/6/85

3/26/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

NR - Not Run* - Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 4 OF 4

TABLE 4b

FIELD SCREENING - GROUNDWATER*(TEMPORARY WELLS)

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLEIDENTIFICATION

24 (MW30D PP)

25 (MW25D PP)

26 (MW30D PP)

27 (MW26 PP)

28 (MW19 PP)

MW5D 344 -374 '

MW5D 394-42.4'

MW5D 40-43'

MW5D 51 5-53.5'

MW5D 61 64'

MW5D 67-70'

MW5D PP

MW12 PP

MW13 PP

MW14 PP

MW15 DIS

DATEANALYZED

5/14/85

5/14/85

5/ 14/85

5/14/85

5/15/85

3/12/85

3/13/85

3/18/85

3/19/85

3/19/85

3/20/85

4/9/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

3/12/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

- Does nol include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS - Dischaiye Sample

PAGE 1 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPtEGELBERG SITE


MW.15 PP

MW19 DIS

MW19 PP

MW19 PP

MW20D 43-45 5'

MW20D 62-65'

MW20D 67-70'

MW20D 72-76'

MW20D 73 5-76'

MW20D 73 5-76'dup

MW20D 83 85 5'

MW20D 93 94 5'

MW20D 100-102 5'

MW20D 108-1105'

MW20D 119-120'

MW20D 130-131 5'

DATEANALYZED

4/3/85

3/14/85

4/9/86

5/13/85

3/19/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

4/3/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/29/85

4/1/85

4/1/85

4/2/85

4/3/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG DIOXINS

EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

= Does not include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS = Discharge Sample

PAGE 2 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPIEGELBERG SITE


MW20D 140-142'

MW20D 150-152'

MW20D 160-162.5'

MW20D 170-1725'

MW20D 171-173 5'

MW24 DIS

MW24 PP

MW24 PPdup

MW25D 47 .5-50 5'

MW25D 62-64 5'

MW25D 72-75 5'

MW25D 100 102'

MW25D 110 112'

MW25D 120-122'

MW25D 130-132'

MW25D 140-142'

DATEANALYZED

4/3/85

3/28/85

4/8/85

4/9/85

4/10/85

3/21/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

3/27/85

4/12/85

4/15/85

4/16/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/18/85

4/18/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


|TOXICITYi

NUSLABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

* = Does not include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS = Discharge Sample

PAGE 3 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPIEGELBERG SITE


MW25D 1515-154'

MW25D 162-164'

MW25D 172-174'

MW25D 176-178'

MW26 DIS

MW26 PP

MW26 PP

MW30D 30-33'

MW30D 63-66'

MW30D 108-110'

MW30D 118-120'

MW30D 128-120'

MW30D 130-134'

MW37 54-57'

MW37 58'

MW37 58' dup

DATEANALYZED

4/19/85

4/22/85

4/22/85

4/22/85

3/22/85

4/3/85

4/9/B5

4/30/85

5/2/85

5/2/85

5/3/85

5/6/85

5/7/85

7/2/85

7/1/85

7/1/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

1

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

* = Does not include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS - Discharge Sample

PAGE 4 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPIEGELBER6 SITESAMPLE

IDENTIFICATION

MW44 80-83'

MW44 88 -91'

MW44 98-10V

MW44 108- 11 1'

MW44 119-121'

MW44 129-132'

MW44 139-140'

MW44 149-150'

MW44 156-160'

MW45 90'

MW45 100'

MW45 110'

MW45 118 120'

MW45 130'

MW45 140'

MW45 148-151'

DATEANALYZED

10/9/85

10/10/85

10/10/85

10/14/85

10/14/85

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/17/85

10/22/85

9/12/85

9/12/85

9/13/85

9/19/85

9/20/85

9/20/85

9/23/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXIGTYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

= Does not include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS = Discharge Sample

PAGE 5 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPIEGELBERG SITE


MW4S 158-160'

MW45 159 163'

MW45 168-171'

MW46 102-105'

MW46 112-115'

MW46 122 5-125.5*

MW46 132 5-135 5'

MW46 142 145'

MW46 152-155'

MW46 158-160'

MW46 162-165'

MW46 162-165'dup

MW46 172-175'

MW46 177'

MW46 182-185'

MW49 125-126'

DATEANALYZED

9/24/85

9/26/85

9/24/85

10/7/85

10/8/85

10/8/65

10/8/85

10/9/85

10/9/85

10/17/85

10/10/85

10/10/85

10/10/85

10/17/85

10/11/85

10/25/85

H5LVOAs

H5LBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

* = Does not include prep runs or blanksPP = Post Production SampleDIS = Discharge Sample

PAGE 6 OF 7

TABLE 4b


SPIEGELBERG SITE


*

MW49 146 149'

MW49 PP

81-5 PP

81-6 PP

SPB3 45'

SPB3 45' dup

SPB4 DIS

DATEANALYZED

10/28/85

10/28/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/26/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

* = r ^es not include prep runs or blanksPP Production Sampler rge Sample

PAGF 7 OF 7

TABLE 4c

FIELD SCREENING - SOIL BORINGS*

SPIEGELBERG SITE


SPB3 1-2.5'

SPB3 3 5 5 '

SPB3 8.5-10'

SPB3 13.5-15'

SPB3 18.5-20'

SPB3 23.5-25'

SPB3 28.5-30'

SPB4 2.5'

SPB4 5'

SPB4 10'

SPB4 15'

SPB4 20'

SPB5 0'

SPB5 2.5'

SPB5 5'

SPB5 10'

SPB10 0'

DATEANALYZED

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/26/85

3/26/85

3/26/85

3/26/85

3/26/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/28/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG DIOXINS EP

TOXICITY

i

NUSLABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

———————— \

= Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 1 OF 3

TABLE 4c


SPIEGELBERG SITE


SPB10 2 r'

SPB10 5'

SPB10 10k

SPB11 0'

SPB11 2.5'

SPB11 5'

SPBII 10'SPB13 0'

SPB13 2.5'

SPB13 5'

SPB13 10'

SPB14 0'

SPBH 2.5'

SPB14 5'

SPB14 10'

SPB15 0'

SPB15 2.5'

DATEANALYZED

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/65

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 2 OF 3

TABLE 4c


SPIEGELBERG SITE


SPB15 5'

SPB15 10'

SPB16 0'

SPB16 2 5'

SPB16 5'

SPB16 10'

SPMW20D 39.5-41'

DATEANALYZED

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/19/85

HSLVOAs

HSLSNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG. DtOXINS EP

TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

= Doesnot include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 3 OF 3

TABLE 4d

NUS LABORATORY ANALYSIS FOR INORGANIC TARGET COMPOUNDS - SOILS

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SOS-001

SP-SOS-002

SP-SOS-003

SP-SOS-004

DATESAMPLED

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 4e

HSL ANALYSIS - GRAVEL, SURFACE WATER, SEDIMENT

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GR-001

SP-GR-002

SP-SW-000

SP-SW-001

SPSW-001A

SP-SW-002

SP-SW-003

SP-SW-004

SP-SD-000

SP-SD-001

SP-SD-001A

SP-SD-002

SPSD-003

SP-SD-004

DATESAMPLED

1/16/85

1/16/85

12/4/84

12/4/84

12/4/84

12/4/84

12/4/84

12/4/84

12/6/84

12/6/84

12/6/84

12/6/84

12/6/84

12/6/84

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 4f

HSL ANALYSIS - TEST PIT SAMPLES

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-TP-001

SP-TP-002

SP-TP-003

SP-TP-004

SP-TP-005

SP-TP-006

SP-TP-007

SP-TP-008

DATESAMPLED

6/1 1/85

6/1 1/85

6/1 1/85

6/1 1/85

6/11/85

6/1 1/85

6/1 1/85

6/1 1/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITYr

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 4g

HSL AND FIELD SCREENING ANALYSIS") - SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE SOILS

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMdER

sp-so-oorSP-SOFS-GJ1

SP-SOFS-Ob2

SP-SOFS-003

SP-SOFS-004

SP-SOFS-005

SP-SOFS 006

SP-SO-006

SP-SOFS-007

SP-SO-007

SP-SO-007A

SP-SOFS-008

SP-SOFS-009

SP-SO-009

SP-SOFS-010

SPSOFS-011

DATESAMPLED

1/3/85

12/11/84

12/11/84

12/12/84

12/12/84

12/12/84

12/12/84

1/3/85

12/12/84

1/3/85

1/3/85

12/12/84

12/12/84

1/3/85

1/5/85

1/15/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

I

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re-extracted(U =

PAGE 1 OF 6

TABLE 4g

HSL AND FIELD SCREENING ANALYSISO) - SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE SOILS

SPIE6ELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SPSOFS012

SPSOFS-013

5P-SOFS-014

5P-SOFS-015

SP-SOFS-016

SP-SO-016

SP-SO-016A

SPSOFS-017

SP-SOFS-018

SP-SOFS 019

SP-SOFS020

SP-SO-020

SPSOFS-021

SP-SOFS-022

SPSO-022

SP-SOFS-023

DATESAMPLED

1/6/85

1/6/85

1/6/85

1/6/86

1/6/85

1/10/85

1/10/85

1/6/85

1/6/85

1/6/85

1/6/85

1/10/85

5/29/85

5/29/85

1/10/85

5/29/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

*

X

X

HSL8NA

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re extracted0) =

PAGE 2 OF 6

TABLE 4g


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SO023

SP-SOFS-024

SP-SO-024"'

SP-SO-025

SP-SO-026

SP-SO-026A

SP-SO-027

SP-SO-028

SP-SO-029

SP-SO 030

SP-SO-031

SP-SO-032

SP-SOQ33

SP-SO-034

SP-SO-034A

SPSO-035

DATESAMPLED

1/10/85

5/29/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/22/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re-extracted(D =

PAGE 3 OF 6

TABLE 4g


SPIEGELBERG SITE————————— V —————

SAMPLENUMBER

SPSO 036

SP-SO-037

SP-SO 038

SP-SO- 039

SP-SO040

SP-SO 041

SP-SO 042

SP-SO-043

SP-SO-044

SP-SO 04 5

SP-SO-046

SP-SO-047

SP-SO048

SP-SO-049

SP-SO-050

SP-SO-051

DATESAMPLED

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

3/20/85

3/21/85

3/21/85

3/21/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re-extracted(1) =

PAGE 4 OF 6

TABLE 4g

HSL AND FIELD SCREENING ANALYSIS*') • SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE SOILS

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-SO-052

SP-SO-053

SP-SO-054

SP-SOFS-055

SP-SO-055

SP-SOFS-056

SP-SO-056

SPSOFS-057

SP-SO-057

SPSO-058

SP-SO-058A

SP-SO-059

SP-SO-060

SP-SO-061

SP-SO-062

SP-SO-062A

DATESAMPLED

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

5/14/86

5/14/86

5/14/86

5/14/86

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X,

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DtOXINS EPTOXICITY

i

NUSLABSCREENING

>

•

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re-extracted(1) =

PAGE 5 OF 6

TABLE 4g


SPIE6ELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

AFTERJUNE, 1986

SP-SO-063 ,

SP-SO-064

SP-SO-065

DATESAMPLED

6/21/86

8/21/86

8/21/86

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

X

X

X

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

RE = Sample re-extracted(D =

PAGE 6 OF 6

TABLE 4h

HSL AND OTHER LAB ANALYSIS - GROUNDWATER(MONITORING WELLS)

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000"

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-002

SP-GW-003

SP-GW-004

SP-GW-005

SP-GW-005A

SP-GW-006

SP-GW-007

SP-GW-008

DATESAMPLED

3/27/85

4/10/85

4/23/85

5/8/85

10/16/85

10/30/85

5/14/86

1/31/85

1/31/85

1/30/85

1/30/85

1/30/85

1/30/85

1/30/85

3/27/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

*X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

OIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH

RE = Sample re-extractedN = NUS Laboratory-quick turnaround

PAGE 1 OF 8

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW009

SP-GW-010

SP-GW-010A

SP-GW-011

SP-GW-012

SP-GW-013

SP-GW-014

SP-GW-015N

SP-GW-015

SP-GW-016

SP-GW-016A

SP-GW-017

SP-GW-01B

SP-GW-019

SP-GW-020N

DATESAMPLED

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/1 1/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

4/10/85

4/1 1/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH


PAGE 2 OF 8

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-021

SP-GW-021A

SP-GW-022

SP-GW-022A

SP GW-023

SP-GW-024

SP-GW-025

SP-GW-026

SP-GW-026A

SP-GW-027

SP-GW-028

SP-GW-029

SP-GW-029A

SP-GW-030

SP-GW-031

DATESAMPLED

4/23/85

4/23/85

5/7/85

5/7/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

5/15/85

5/15/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

10/15/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

H5LBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

MDPH

RE = Sample re-extractedN = NUS Laboratory-qukk turnaround

PAGE 3 OF 8

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-032

SP-GW-032A

SP-GW-033

SP-GW-034

SP-GW-035

SP-GW-036

SP-GW-037

SP-GW-038

SP-GW-039

SP-GW-040

SP-GW-041

SP-GW 042

SP-GW-043

SP-GW-043A

SP-GW 044

DATESAMPLED

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/29/85

10/29/85

10/29/85

10/30/85

10/29/85

10/29/85

10/31/85

10/30/85

10/31/85

10/31/85

11/18/85

11/18/85

5/14/86

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

s*

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXIQTY

NUS LABSCREENING

*

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRYMDPH

1


PAGE 4 OF 8

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-045

SP-GW-046

SP-GW-047

SP-GW-048

SP-GW-049

SP-GW-050

SP-GW-051

AFTER JUNE, 1986

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-000

SP-GW-052

SP-GW-053

SP-GW-054

DATESAMPLED

5/14/86

S/ 14/86

5/14/86

5/14/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

5/14/86

3/18/87

3/20/87

3/24/87

7/24/87

3/17/87

3/18/87

3/17/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH

RE = Sample re-extractedN - NUS Laboratory-quick turnaround

PAGE 5 OF 8

TABLE 4h

HSL AND OTHER LAB ANALYSIS - GROUNOWATER(MONITORING WELLS)

SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-055

SP-GW-055A

SP-GW-056

SP-GW-057

SP-GW-058

SP-GW 059

SP-GW-060

SP-GW-061

SP-GW-062

SP-GW-063

SP-GW-064

SP-GW-065

SP-GW-065A

5P-GW-066

SPGW067

DATESAMPLED

3/18/67

3/18/67

3/18/87

3/23/87

3/18/87

3/1 B/87

3/18/87

3/18/87

3/19/87

3/19/87

3/18/87

3/19/87

3/19/87

3/19/87

3/19/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

*X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH

RE = Sample re-extractedN = NUS Laboratory - quick turnaround

PAGE 6 OF 8

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-068

SP-GW-069

5P-GW-070

SP-GW-071

SP-GW-072

SP-GW-073

SP-GW-074

SP-GW-075

SP-GW-075A

SP-GW-076

5P-GW-077

SP-GW-078

SP-GW-079

SP-GW-080

SP-GW-081

DATESAMPLED

3/19/87

3/23/87

3/18/87

3/24/87

3/24/87

3/23/87

3/19/87

3/18/87

3/18/87

3/20/87

3/23/87

3/20/87

3/23/87

3/24/87

3/24/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH


PAGE 7 OF 8jft

TABLE 4h


SPIEGELBERG SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

SP-GW-082

SP-GW-083

SP-GW-084

SP-GW-085

SP-GW-085A

SP-GW-086

SP-GW-087

SP-GW-OB8

SP-GW-089

SP-GW-090

SP-GW-091

SP-GW-091A

DATESAMPLED

3/24/87

3/24/B7

3/24/87

3/23/87

3/23/87

6/26/87

6/26/87

6/26/87

6/26/87

6/26/87

7/24/87

7/24/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X "

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXtCITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

MDPH

X

X

X

X

X

RE = Sample re-extractedN = NUS Laboratory - quick turnaround

PAGE 8 OF 6

TABLE 5a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SG-01

RA-SG-02

RA-SG-03

RA-SG-04

RA-SG-05

RA-SG-06

RA-SG-07

RA-SG-08

RA-SG-09

RA-SG-10

RA-SG-11

RA-SG-12

RA-SG-13

RA-SG-14

RA-SG-15

RASG-16

DATESAMPLED

1/:0/85

1/30/85

1/LO/85

1/30/85

2/27/85

2/14/85

2/14/85

2/1 1/85

2/1 1/85

2/1 1/85

2/1 1/85

2/11/85

2/5/85

2/1 1/85

2/14/85

2/14/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITY

1

NUS LABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

NR = Not Run* = Does not include preparation runs or blanks

PAGE 1 OF 4

TABLE 5a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SG-17

RA-SG-19

RA-SG-19

RA-5G-20

RA-SG-21

RA-SG-22

RA-SG-23

RA-SG-24

RA-SG-25

RA-SG-26

RA-SG-27

RA-SG-28

RA-SG-29

RA-SG-30

RA-SG-31

RA-SG-32

DATESAMPLED

2/27/85

2/27/85

2/27/85

2/27/85

--

3/1/85

3/6/85

3/6/85

--

--

3/19/85

3/19/85

3/19/85

3/19/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

I

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

DIOXINS EP.TOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

NR

X

X

X

NR

NR

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 2 OF 4

TABLE 5a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SG-33

RA-SG-34

RA-SG-35

RA-SG-36

RA-SG-37

RA-SG-38

RA-SG-39

RA-SG-40

RA-SG-41

RA-SG-42

RA-SG-43

RA-SG-44

RA-SG-45

RA-SG-46

RA-SG-47

RA-SG-48

DATESAMPLED

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24*25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

HSLVOAs

V

HStBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

NR a Not Run* = Does not include preparation runs or blanks

PAGE 3 OF 4

TABLE 5a

SOIL GAS ANALYSIS*

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SG-49

RA-SG-50

RA-SG-51

RA-SG-52

RA-SG-53

RA-SG-54

RA-SG-55

RA-SG-56

RA-SG-57

RA-SG-58

RA-SG-59

RA-SG-60

DATESAMPLED

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

9/24-25/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

-


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENING

"

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 4 OF 4

TABLE 5b


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


MW16 DIS

MW16 PP

MW16 PP dup

MW17 DIS

MW17 PP

MW17 PP

MW17 PP dup

MW18 100'

MW18 100' dup

MW18 56.5-59 5'

MW18 60.5-63.5'

MW18 70.5-72'

MW18 80-83'

MW18 90'

MW18 PP

MW18 PP

DATEANALYZED

3/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

3/4/85

4/9/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

3/25/85

3/25/85

3/14/65

3/15/85

3/21/85

3/22/85

3/25/85

4/9/85

5/15/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNOS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PP = Post ProductionDIS = Discharge* ~ Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 1 OF 5

TABLE 5b


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


MW21 PP

MW21 DIS

MW21 PP

MW22 PP

MW23 55.5-58.5'

MW23 59 5-62.5'

MW23 PP

MW23 PP

MW23 PP dup

MW27 DIS

MW27 PP

MW28 DIS

MW28 PP

MW28 PP dup

MW31D 26-29'

MW31D 30-32'

DATEANALYZED

9/9/85

3/19/85

4/9/85

4/10/85

3/21/85

3/21/85

4/26/85

5/14/85

5/14/85

3/26/85

4/9/85

3/29/85

4/10/85

4/10/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

-

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUSLAB

SCREENING

t

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

«

PP = Post ProductionDIS = Discharge* = Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 2 OF 5

TABLE 5b


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


MW31D 40-43'

MW31D 50-53'iMW31D 64-67'

MW31D 72-75'

MW31D PP

MW32 39-42'

MW32 52 5'

MW32 52 5' dup

MW32 58'

MW32 61.5'

MW32 69-70'

MW32 78'

MW32 88-89'

MW33 18'

MW33 28'

MW33 38'

DATEANALYZED

5/8/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

5/14/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/19/85

6/14/85

6/14/85

6/17/85

6/17/85

6/19/85

6/19/85

6/19/85

HSLVOAs

•

HSLBNA

1 —————

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PP = Post ProductionDIS = Discharge* - Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 3 OF 5

TABLE 5b


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


MW33 70'

MW33 71-73'

MW34 58-60'

MW34 66-67'

MW34 78'

MW34 89'

MW35 29'

MW3S 50'

MW3S 60'

MW35 70'

MW36 35'

MW36 55-58'

MW36 55-58' dup

MW36 PP

MW38 38'

MW3B 48'

DATEANALYZED

6/19/85

6/20/85

6/21/85

6/20785

6/24/85

6/24/85

6/25/85

6/25/85

6/25/85

6/25/85

6/26/85

6/27/86

6/27/85

6/28/85

7/8/85

7/9/85

HSLVOAs

t*.

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG OIOXINS EP

TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 4 OF 5

TABLE 5b


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


MW39 12'

MW41 141'

MW41 141' dup

MW41 PP

MW42 146'

MW42 155'

MW42 166'

MW42 166' dup

MW42 174-177'

MW42 184'

MW42 PP

MW47 147-150'

MW47 157'

MW47 167'

DATEANALYZED

7/10/85

9/18/85

9/17/85

9/19/85

9/30/85

9/30/85

10/1/85

10/1/85

10/1/85

10/2/85

10/3/85

10/22/85

10/22/85

10/22/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 5 OF 5

TABLE 5c


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE¥


RAB1 0'

RAB1 2.5'

RAB1 5'

RAB1 10'

RAB2 0'

RAB2 2 5'

RAB2 5'

RAB2 10'

RAB6 0'

RAB6 25'

RAB6 5'

RAB6 5' dup

RAB6 10'

RAB7 0'

RAB7 2.V

RAB7 5'

RAB7 10'

RAB8 0'

DATEANALYZED

3/14/B5

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/28/87

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs


TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

t

- Does not include prep runs or blanks

PAGE 1 OF 2

TABLE 5c


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE


RAB8 2.5'

RAB8 5'

RAB8 10'

RAB9 0'

RAB9 2.5'

RAB9 5'

RAB9 10'

RAB12 0'

RAB12 2.5'

RAB12 5'

RAB12 10'

MW18 41'

MW22 15-30'

DATEANALYZED

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

3/14/85

3/20/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCB$

HSLINORG DIOXINS TOX

E,PC|TY

n

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

——————— *-


PAGE 2 OF 2

TABLE 5d

NUS LABORATORY ANALYSIS FOR INORGANIC TARGET COMPOUNDS - SOILS

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUM3ER

RA-SOS-001

RA-SOS-Op2

RA-SOS-003

RA-SOS 004

RA-SOS-005

RA-SOS-006

RA-SOS-007

RA-SOS-008

RA- SOS-009

RA-SOS-010

RA-SOS-011

RA-SOS-012

DATESAMPLED

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

1/12/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

j

HSLPCBs

HSLINORG.

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN.

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 5e

HSL ANALYSIS - GRAVEL

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GR-001

RA-GR-002

DATESAMPLED

1/16/85

2/1/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 1

TABLE 5f


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-TP-009

RA-TP-010

RA-TP-011

RA-TP-012

RA-TP-013

RA-TP-014

RA-TP-015

RA-TP-016

RA-TP-017

RA-TP-018

RA-TP-019

RA-TP-020

RA-TP-021

RA-TP-022

RA-TP-023

RA-TP-024

DATESAMPLED

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

t xX

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINSEP

TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 1 OF 3

TABLE 5f

HSL ANALYSIS • TEST PIT SAMPLES

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITEV

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-TP-025

RA-TP-026

RA-TP-027

RA-TP-028

RA-TP-029

RA-TP-030

RA-TP-031

RA-TP-032

RA-TP-033

RA-TP-034

RA-TP-035

RA-TP036

RA-TP-037

RA-TP-038

RA-TP-039

RA-TP-040

DATESAMPLED

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/12/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

r

PAGE 2 OF 3

TABLE 5f


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-TP-041

RA-TP-042

RA-TP-043

RA-TP-044

RA-TP-045

RA-TP-046

RA-TP-047

RA-TP-048

RA-TP-049

RA-TP-050

RA-TP-051

RA-TP-052

RA-TP-052A

RA-TP-053

DATESAMPLED

0/13/85

ft/ 13/85

W13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

6/13/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOX1CITY

1

NUSLABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 3 OF 3

TABLE 5g

HSL AND FIELD SCREENING ANALYSIS - SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE SOILS

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SOFS-01

RA-SOFS-O'M 2'

RA-SOFS-002

RA-SOFS-002 2'

RA-SOFS-003

RA-SO-003

RA-SOFS-003 2'

RA-SO-003 2'

RA-SOFS-004

RA-SO-004

RA-SOFS-005

RA-SOFS 006

RA-SOFS-007

RA-SOFS-008

RA-SOFS-009

RASOFS-010

DATESAMPLED

12/11/84

12/19/84

12/19/84

12/19/84

12/11/84

1/10/85

12/19/84

1/10/85

12/12/85

. 1/3/85

12/12/84

12/12/84

12/19/84

. 12/19/84

1/5/85

1/5/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

I

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

R = Blank for PCB samplesRE = Re-extraction

PAGE 1 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SOFS-011

RA-SQFS-012

RA-SOFS-013

RA-SO-013"'

RA SOFS-014

RA-SO-014

RA-SOFS-015

RA-SO-015

RA-SOFS-016

RA-SO-016

RA-SO-017

RASOFS-018

RA-SOFS-019

RA-SO-019

RA-SO-019A

RA-SOFS-020

DATESAMPLED

1/5/85

1/6/85

1/9/85

1/15/85

1/9/85

1/15/85

1/9/85

1/16/85

1/9/85

1/16/85

1/16/85

5/29/85

5/29/85

1/15/85

1/15/85

5/29/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

\x

"

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

• DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

R - Blank for PCB samplesRE - Re-extraction

PAGE 2 OF 10

TABLE 5g

HSL AND FIELD SCREENING ANALYSIS * SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE SOILS

RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-020

RA-SOFS-021

RA-SO-021

RA-SOFS-022

RA-SO-022

RA-SO-023

RA-SO-024

RA-SO-025

RA-SO-026

RA-SO-026A

RA-SO-027

RA-SO-028

RA-SO-029

RA-SO-030

RA-SO-031

RA-SO-032

DATESAMPLED

1/15/85

5/29/85

1/16/85

5/29/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/1/85

2/7/85

' 2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

2/7/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

, X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

N US LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 3 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE>

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-033

RA-SO-034

RA-SO-035

RA-SO-036

RA-SO037

RA SO-037A

RA SO-038

RA-SO-039

RA-SO-040

RA-SO-041

RA SO-042

RA SO 043

RA-SO-044

RA-SO-045

RA-SO-046

RA SO 046A

DATESAMPLED

2/22/85

2/22/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

2/28/85

3/13/85

3/15/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

' X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINSEP

TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

r

R - Blank for PCB samplesRE = Re-extraction

PAGE 4 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-047

RA-SO-048

RA-SO049

RA-SO-050

RA-SO-051

RA-SO-052

RA-SO-053

RA-SO-054

RA-SO-055

RA-SO-056

RA-SO-057

RA-SO-058

RA-SO059

RA-SO-060

RA-SO-061

RA-SO-061A

DATESAMPLED

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/14/85

3/20/85

3/20/85

3/20/85

3/20/85

3/20/85

3/20/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/27/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

>

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

——————— \


PAGE 5 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-062

RA-SO-063

RA-SOFS-064

RA-SO-064

RA-SO-064A

RASOFS-065

RA-SO-065

RA-SOFS-066

RA-SOFS-066D

RA-SO-066

RA-SO-067

RA-SO-068

RA-SOFS-069

RA-SO-069

RA-SOFS-070

RA-SO070

DATESAMPLED

3/28/85

3/28/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

4/3/85

3/28/85

3/28/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/ 17/85

4/17/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

1X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

X

X

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 6 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-070A

RA-SOFS-071

RA-SO-071

RASOFS-072

RASO-072

RA-SOFS-073

RA-SO-073

RA-SOFS-074

RA-SO-074

RA-SO-075

RA-SO076

RA-SO-077

RA-SO-078

RA-SO-079

RA-SO-080

RA-SO-081

DATESAMPLED

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

4/17/85

5/8/85

5/8/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

,x'• •

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINSEP

TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

X

X

X

X

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

R = Blank for PCS samplesRE = Re-extraction

PAGE 7 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-082

RA-SO-083

RA-SO-084

RA-SO-085

RA-SO-085A

RA-SO-086

RA-SO-087

RA-SO-08B

RA-SO-089

RA-SO-090

RA-SO-091

RA-SO-092

RA-SO-093

RA-SO-094

RA-SO-095

RA-SO-096

DATESAMPLED

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

HSLVOAs

HSLBNA

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

. X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG DIOXINS EP

TOXICITYNUS LAB

SCREENINGFIELD

SCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

R - Blank for PCB samplesRE = Re-extraction

PAGE 8 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITEr

SAMPLENUMBER

RASO-097

RA-SO-098

RA-SO-099

RA-SO-100

RA-SO-101

RA-SO-000"

RA SO- 102

RA-SO-103

RA-SO-104

RA-SO-105

RA-SO-106

RA-SO-106A

RA-SO-107

RA-SO-108

RA-SO-109

RA-SO-110

DATESAMPLED

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/5/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

9/18/85

10/9/85

10/9/85

10/9/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG DIOXINS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

EPTOX1CITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

*

R = Blank for PCB samplesRE = Re-e'xtraction

PAGE 9 OF 10

TABLE 5g


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-SO-111

RA-SO-112

RA-SO-113

RA-SO-114

RA-SO-115

RA-SO-116

RA-SO-117

RA-SO-117A

DATESAMPLED

10/9/85

10/9/85

10/9/85

10/10/85

10/10/85

10/10/85

. 10/10/85

10/10/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG. DIOXINS

—— f

EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY


PAGE 10 OF 10

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-OQO

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-001

RA-GW-002

RA-GW-003

RA-GW-004

RA-GW-004A

RA-GW-005

RA-GW-006

RA-GW-007

RA-GW-008

RA GW-009

RA-GW-010

DATESAMPLED

1/31/85

4/3/85

5/14/85

7/30/85

9/10/85

11/18/85

1/30/85

1/30/85

1/31/85

3/26/85

3/26/85

4/3/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

4/10/85

4/9/85

4/9/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Xj

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE 1 OF 6

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GW-011

RA-GW-016

RA-GW-017

RA-GW-018

RA-GW-019

RA-GW-020

RA-GW-021

RA-GW-022

RA-GW-023

RA-GW-024

RA-GW-025

RA-GW-026

RA-GW-027

RA-GW-028

RA-GW-029

RA-GW-029A

RA-GW-030

DATESAMPLED

4/10/85

4/1 1/85

5/14/85

5/15/85

5/13/85

5/14/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

7/30/85

9/9/85

9/9/85

10/14/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

-X

xX

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOX1CITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE 2 OF 6

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GW-031

RA-GW-032

RA-GW-033

RA-GW-034

RA-GW-035

RA-GW-036

RA-GW-037

RA-GW-038

RA-GW-039

RA-GW-039A

RA-GW-040

RA-GW-041

RA-GW-042

RA-GW 043

RA-GW-044

RA-GW-045

RA-GW-046

DATESAMPLED

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/14/85

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/15/85

10/30/85

10/30/85

10/31/85

10/31/85

10/31/85

10/31/85

10/30/85

11/18/85

11/18/85

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOX1CITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

PAGE 3 OF 6

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GW-047

RA-GW-049

RA-GW-050

RA GW 051

RA-GW-052

RA-GW-053

RA-GW-054

RA-GW-055

RA-GW-056

RA-GW-057

RA-GW-058

RA-GW-059

RA-GW-059A

RA-GW-Q60

After June, 1986

RA-GW-061

RA-GW-06)

DATESAMPLED

11/18/85

S/ 13/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

5/14/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

5/14/86

5/13/86

5/14/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

5/13/86

3/16/87

3/17/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

-X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUS LABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

PAGE 4 OF 6

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

ORA-GW-63

RA-GW-064

RA-GW-065

RA-GW-066

RA-GW-067

RA-GW-068

RA-GW-069

RA-GW-070

RA-GW-070A

RA-GW-071

RA-GW-072

RA-GW-073

RA-GW-074

RA-GW-075

RA-GW-076

RA-GW-077

RA-GW-078

DATESAMPLED

J/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/19/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/17/87

3/19/87

3/19/87

3/23/87

3/19/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

»

FIELDSCREENING

ONRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE 5 OF 6

TABLE 5h


RASMUSSEN DUMP SITE

SAMPLENUMBER

RA-GW-079

RA-GW-080

RA-GW-081

RA-GW-082

RA-GW-083

RA-GW-084

RA-GW-084A

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-000

RA-GW-085

RA-GW-086

RA-GW-087

DATESAMPLED

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/20/87

3/16/87

3/18/87

7/23/87

7/23/87

7/23/87

HSLVOAs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLBNA

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLPCBs

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

HSLINORG.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

DIOXINS EPTOXICITY

NUSLABSCREENING

FIELDSCREENING

DNRGEN

CHEMISTRY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PAGE 6 OF 6

Speed Letter, 44-902

Tor> xUiATfiA -

Speed Letteru From

Subject,

MESSAGE

new&s.

Pate ) Q J l )Q7 Signed AL

REPLY

Date Signed

"̂ sonJonesd-WINTEDINUSA

RECIPIENT-RETAIN WHITE COPY. RETURN "INK COPY