october 17 , 2016 magali...
TRANSCRIPT
SWITCH-Med Programme
is funded by the
European Union
Definition of a set of SCP Action Plan Indicators for the Mediterranean
October 17th, 2016
Magali OUTTERS – Team Leader policy Area SCP/RAC
Alessandro GALLI – Indicators expert SCP/RAC
2
Regional policy component
Starting
date:
October 2012
End date Extended until june 2017
Expected
result
Proposal for the integration of SCP in the Regional Mediterranean policy ¬
governance framework are submitted for approval to the Contracting Parties of
the Barcelona Convention. A SCP Road Map for the Mediterranean is developed.
3
Main results of the Regional Policy Component
SCP as one of the key theme of the UfM Ministerial Declaration on Environment and Climate Change (May 14)
Adoption of the SCP Action Plan for the Mediterranean and its Roadmap for implementation at the COP 19 of the Barcelona Convention (Feb 16)
4
Activity 1.2: Integration of SCP proposals into the
UNEP/MAP Barcelona Convention policy and
governance process
1 regional stakeholers consultation meeting with 40 organisations (oct 2015)
2 SCP/RAC focal points consultation meetings + online consultation
Development of 5 drafts of the documents, integrating more than 400 comments from 20countries
Preparation of a Decision to submit the SCP Action Plan to the MAP FP and CPs
Coordination with the MSSD review process
5
6
Consumption and production priority areas
7
SO1 SO2 SO3
Food,
Fisheries and
Agriculture
Goods
Manufacturing Tourism
Housing &
Construction
Structure of the SCP Action Plan
51 suggested actions and related regional activities
• 4 consumption
and production
priority areas
• 12 operative
objectives
3 Strategic
objectives
8
Evaluation of the SCP AP
“56. The evaluation will be done on the basis of the
accomplishment of the strategic and operational
objectives of the Action Plan, using appropriated
indicators measuring progress on SCP mainstreaming
and streamlining at the regional level. To this end, the
definition of a set of regional indicators will be
required and will build on existing SCP indicators
frameworks (UNEP, OECD, EEA, etc.). In this
regards, and as suggested during the
Extraordinary Meeting of the SCP/RAC Focal
Points (November 2014, Barcelona), a Technical
Working Group on SCP Indicators for the Regional
Action Plan will be put in place by the Contracting
Parties. Its specific mandate will be subject of a
proposal to be submitted for consideration and
approval by the Contracting Parties; it should include
the establishment of a baseline against which
progress will be measured.”
9
SCP Indicator Selection: aims
AIMS
o Identify a suite of SCP Indicators for
future use in monitoring national and
regional progresses against the SCP
Action Plan
o Map their current availability in the
21 contracting parties of the
Barcelona Convention as well as in
Jordan and Palestine
o The aim IS NOT to come up with
new indicators BUT rather identify
those existing indicators that will
best support SCP monitoring in the
region, while ensuring consistency
with other processes (e.g., SDGs)
10
SCP Indicator Selection: timeline
Desk Work
Consultations
Adoption
o Review preliminary list of
indicators on October 17th
o Revised list shared by end of
November for 2nd round of review
o Written consultations with National
SCP Focal Points and SCP
experts by December 23rd
o Final list of indicator and mapping
exercise completed by mid
February 2017
o Review at various meetings of the
MAP governance process in
before final consideration at the
2017 Barcelona Convention COP
11
SCP Indicator Selection:
the approach used
Overall, preference was given to compile a
comprehensive list of indicators theoretically apt for
tracking SCP
o SCP-related indicators were taken from SDG 12 and
coupled with SCP-relevant indicators from the other
SDGs
o The UN SDGs Report 2016 was reviewed to get a
better sense of data availability for the agreed SDGs
indicators
o Other non-SDGs, SCP-relevant indicators provided
and/or promoted by international organizations were
identified and added to the list
o Final indicator list compared with BE indicators and
indicators computable from the SEEA
12
SCP Indicator Selection:
the approach used
1) SECTORS vs. TRANSVERSAL
THEMATIC AREAS: Indicators
can be applied to multiple sectors
and they are defined on the basis
of their research question – that is
the parameter/theme they aim to
measure: as such they have been
grouped by transversal thematic
areas rather than the sectors to
which they are applicable.
2) A short set of thematic macro-
indicators, possibly useful in
communicating SCP progresses,
has also been included
Transversal issues
• Land use;
• Water efficiency;
• Resource efficiency;
• Energy efficiency;
• Pollution (generated by waste water, chemicals, solid waste, etc.).
• Transportation & Mobility
• Consumer Behavior.
Transversal issues
• Land use;
• Water (Efficiency)
• Energy (efficiency)
• Pollution
• Resource (Efficiency) – Terrestrial
• Resource (Efficiency) – Marine
• Behavior (Consumers & Producers)
13
SCP Indicator Selection:
scope of this workshop
o Gather feedbacks on the selected indicators and inputs on the
availability of these indicators within countries
o Per each indicator, we would like to know whether it is:
useful and measurable,
useful but not measurable
not useful
o In few instances, alternative indicators have been presented for
a single parameter; only one to be selected.
o Additionally, we would like to gather feedbacks on which
Ministry/department in each nation is responsible for reporting
on each indicator
14
SCP Indicator Selection:
overview
Thematic Area Indicators Identified
Indicators Available
Indicators Available
%
LAND USE 6 3 50%
WATER (EFFICIENCY) 5 4 80%
ENERGY (EFFICIENCY) 7 4 57%
POLLUTION 12 10 83%
RESOURCE (EFFICIENCY) - TERRESTRIAL 5 5 100%
RESOURCE (EFFICIENCY) - MARINE 5 1 20%
BEHAVIOR (PRODUCERS & CONSUMERS) 17 10 59%
SUB-TOTAL 57 37 65%
MACRO-INDICATORS 9 5 56%
TOTAL 66 42 64%
15
16
SCP Indicator Selection:
Land Use
Indicators Identified Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
1a Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture
No Yes 2.4.1 No TBC
1b Agricultural area organic, total Yes No 2.4 No TBC
2 Global food loss index No Yes 12.3.1 No No
3a Index of sustainable forest management No Yes 15.2.1 No TBC
3b Net permanent forest loss TBC No 15.1; 15.2.1
No TBC
3c Area of Certified forest TBC No 15.2 No TBC
17
SCP Indicator Selection:
Water (efficiency)
Indicators Identified Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
4 Water Productivity Yes No 6.4 No Yes
5a Freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (also known as water withdrawal intensity)
Yes Yes 6.4.2 No No
5b Agricultural water withdrawal as % of total renewable water resources
Yes No 6.4.2 No No
6 Direct use of agricultural drainage water Yes No 6.3; 6.4
No No
7 Degree of integrated water resources management (IWRM) implementation (0-100)
No - only aggregates
Yes 6.5.1 No No
18
SCP Indicator Selection:
Energy (efficiency)
Indicators Identified Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
8a Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology
No - in piloting phase
Yes 7.1.2 No No
8b Access to non-solid fuel (% of population) Yes No 7.1 No No 9 Renewable energy share in the total final energy
consumption Yes Yes 7.2.1 No Possi
bly 10 Energy Intensity of the Economy Yes Yes 7.3.1 No Yes 11 Investments in energy efficiency as a percentage of
GDP No Yes 7.b.1 No Possi
bly 12 Total Energy use Yes No - No Yes 13 Amount of fossil-fuel subsidies per unit of GDP
(production and consumption) and as a proportion of total national expenditure on fossil fuels
No Yes 12.c.1 No Possibly
19
SCP Indicator Selection:
Pollution
Indicators Identified Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
14 CO2 emission per unit of value added Yes Yes 9.4.1 No Yes 15 Demand-based CO2 emissions Yes No 9.4 No Yes 16 Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter in cities Yes Yes 11.6.2 No Possibl
y 17 Air Pollution Yes No 11.6.2 No Yes
18a Proportion of wastewater safely treated No - by 2018 Yes 6.3.1 No Yes 18b Generation and discharge of wastewater by pollutant Yes No 6.3 NO Yes 19 Generation of waste Yes No 11.6; 12.4 No Yes 20 Gross Nutrient Balance (as defined by Eurostat) or the
similar Gross Nitrogen Balance (as defined by EEA) Yes No 12.4 No No
21 Fertilizes nutrient use on arable and permanent crop area
Yes No 6.3; 12.4; 14.1
No Yes
22 Pesticide Use Yes No 6.3; 12.4 No Yes 23 Use of Chemicals products by sectors No No 6.3; 12.4 No Yes 24 Signatory of 1 to 3 international multilateral
environmental agreements (Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions) on hazardous waste, and other chemicals
Yes - to be derived
Yes 12.4.1 No No
20
SCP Indicator Selection:
Resource (efficiency) – Terrestr.
Indicators Identified Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
25 Material footprint (MF) per GDP Yes Yes 12.2.1; 8.4.1
No Yes
26 Material footprint (MF) per capita Yes Yes 12.2.1; 8.4.1
No Yes
27a Domestic material consumption (DMC) per GDP
Yes Yes 12.2.2; 8.4.2
No Yes
27b Resource Productivity Yes No 12.2.2; 8.4.2
No Yes
28 Domestic material consumption (DMC) per capita
Yes Yes 12.2.2; 8.4.2
No Yes
21
SCP Indicator Selection:
Resource (efficiency) – Marine
Indicators Identified Indicators Available SDG MSSD BE SEEA
29 Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels
No - only global result available
Yes 14.4.1 Yes No
30 Marine Trophic Index (also called Mean Trophic Level (TL) of fisheries landings)
Yes - to be extracted from Sea AroundUs database
No 14.4 No No
31 Sustainable fisheries as a percentage of GDP
No No 14.7 No TBC
32a % of fish catch with sustainable fishing methods
No No 14.2 No No
32b Percentage of certified fishery No No 14.2 No No
22
SCP Indicator Selection:
Behavior (Consumers-Producers) Indicators Identified Indicators Available SDG MSSD BE SEEA
33 Number of countries with sustainable consumption and production (SCP) national action plans or SCP mainstreamed as a priority or target into national policies
No Yes 12.1.1 No No
34a Target 12.6 Live Tracker (also called Sustainability Disclosure Database)
Yes No 12.6 No No
34b Number of companies that have joined the UN Global Compact Initiative.
Yes - derived from UNGC website
No 12.6 No No
35a Number of countries implementing sustainable public procurement policies and action plans
No Yes 12.7.1 No TBC
35b SPP/GPP as a percentage of total public procurement (in terms of monetary value)
TBC No 12.7 No TBC
36 Green Patents (also called Patents of Importance to Green Growth and Development of environment-related technologies, % all technologies)
Yes No 12.7 Yes TBC
37a Share of national budget spent on R&D for sustainable consumption and production (SCP) and environmental sound technologies
No No - 12.a No Possibly
37b R&D expenditure of importance to Green Growth (also called Environmentally related R&D expenditure, % GDP)
Yes No 12.a No Possibly
23
SCP Indicator Selection:
Behavior (Consumers-Producers) Indicators Identified
Indicators Available
SDG MSSD BE SEEA
38a Number of sustainable tourism strategies or policies and implemented action plans, with agreed monitoring and evaluation tools
No Yes 12.b.1 No Yes
38b Number of tourist beds (hotel/facilities) holding eco-label (EMAS, ISO 14000,…) as % of total beds
TBC No 12.b Yes TBC
39a EU Ecolabel licences Yes No 12.1; 12.6
No No
39b Number of EPDs Yes - from Environdec database
No 12.1; 12.6
No No
39c EMAS certifications (per million inhabitants) Yes No 12.1; 12.6
No No
40 Total amount of approved funding for developing countries to promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies
No Yes 17.7.1 No TBC
41a Prevalence of overweight and obesity Yes No 2.2 No No 41b Diet-related death rate Yes No 2.2 No No 42 Adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern Yes - several
metrics No 2 No No
24
SCP Indicator Selection:
Thematic Macro-Indicators
Indicators Identified Indicators Available SDG MSSD BE SEEA
43 Carbon Footprint Yes No 9.4 No Yes 44 Water Footprint Yes No 6.4 No Yes 45 Land Footprint TBC No 12.2 No Yes 25-26
Material Footprint Yes Yes 12.2.1; 8.4.1
No Yes
46 Nitrogen Footprint No - only a few countries
No - No Possibly
47 Chemical Footprint TBC No 12.4 No Possibly 48 Ecological Footprint Yes No 12.2;
8.4 No Yes
49 Ocean Health Index Yes No 14.2 No No 50 Environmental Democracy Index
(or Aarhus Convention Index) No - only few
countries available No 16.3;
16.10; 16.6; 16.7
No No
25
SCP Indicator Selection:
Operational objectives’ coverage Operational Objectives Coverage by
Indicators
Identified
Gaps
Operational Objective 1.1: Promoting Innovation and Knowledge in the
implementation of Best Environmental Practices and Technologies in
the growing, harvesting, processing and consumption phases, allowing
efficient management of resources, minimizing environmental impacts
of the FFA sector in all its life cycle.
Good
coverage
Operational Objective 1.2: Develop the policy and legal framework to
promote sustainable agriculture, fisheries and food production and
consumption, with special focus on the “Mediterranean Diet”, engaging
local communities and small-medium scale producers, distributors &
retailers of sustainable Food, Fisheries and Agriculture products.
Coverage with
minor gaps
Med diet
promotion
Operational Objective 1.3: Sensitize and educate food producers,
retailers and consumers, and support the development of appropriate
market tools and information, to promote sustainability throughout the
value chains of agriculture and fisheries management, as well as food
processing and food distribution.
Coverage with
minor gaps
Med diet
promotion
26
SCP Indicator Selection:
Operational objectives’ coverage Operational Objectives Coverage by
Indicators
Identified
Gaps
Operational Objective 2.1: Promote sustainability-driven innovation8
and knowledge and the integration of Best Available Techniques (BATs)
and Best Environmental Practices (BEPs) through the entire value
chain of goods production, including the upstream and downstream
flows of resources and waste, paying particular attention to the life-cycle
of manufactured goods.
Coverage with
minor gaps
Jobs in
sustainable
manufacture
(more
general sust.
jobs)
Operational Objective 2.2: Develop integrated policy making and the
legal framework to promote sustainable consumption, production and
recovery in the goods manufacturing sector with the aim to move
towards a circular economy
Coverage with
minor gaps
Employment
in sustainable
jobs
Operational Objective 2.3: Educate and raise awareness of consumers
and other stakeholders and support the development of market
structures, increasing the visibility and market share of sustainably
manufactured, used and disposed-of goods and alternative services.
Coverage with
minor gaps
Education
and
promotion
27
SCP Indicator Selection:
Operational objectives’ coverage Operational Objectives Coverage by
Indicators
Identified
Gaps
Operational Objective 3.1: Develop and promote practices and solutions
to ensure efficient use of natural resources and reduce environmental
impacts of tourism, respecting spatial, ecological, and socio-cultural
carrying capacities of the destination
Partially
covered
Promotion,
And
Management
Operational Objective 3.2: Promote regulatory, legislative and financial
measures to mainstream SCP in the tourism consumption and
production area, to reduce tourism seasonality creating green and
decent jobs and to promote local community engagement and
empowerment
Not covered
Operational Objective 3.3: Raise awareness, capacities and technical
skills to support sustainable destinations and green tourism services,
and promote the development of appropriate marketing and
communication tools to ensure a competitive sustainable Mediterranean
Tourism
Partially
covered
Marketing,
communicati
on and
capacity
building
28
SCP Indicator Selection:
Operational objectives’ coverage Operational Objectives Coverage by
Indicators
Identified
Gaps
Operational Objective 4.1: Promote innovation and knowledge and the
integration of Best Available Techniques (BATs) and Best Environmental
Practices (BEPs) that enhance resource efficiency throughout the entire
planning and construction process and life cycle of a building
Not covered Most of the
actions are
not
measurable
(except green
build. code)
Operational objective 4.2: Develop and strengthen the regulatory and
legal framework to enhance the contribution of the housing and
construction sector to sustainable economic development, social
integration and cohesion, and environmental integrity
Partially
covered
Jobs and
annual m3 of
construction
(coastal)
Operational Objective 4.3: Sensitize and raise awareness of all
stakeholders involved in urban planning, housing and construction,
including consumers, professionals of the sectors and institutions and
develop capacities for mainstreaming sustainable urban development
Not covered Most of the
actions are
not
measurable
(except SCP
in education)
29
SCP Indicator Selection:
Operational objectives’ coverage Operational Objectives Coverage by
Indicators
Identified
Gaps
Actions applicable to all priority areas:
Beyond the operational objectives and specific actions of each of the
four consumption and production priority areas, several actions apply to
all priority areas
Partially
covered
Knowledge
exchange
and
promotion of
civil society
led SCP
initiatives
30
SCP Indicator Selection:
workshop scope & next steps
o Gather feedbacks on the selected indicators
Are there indicators that should be removed?
Any missing indicator?
o More specifically, we would like to know whether selected
indicators are:
useful and measurable,
useful but not measurable
not useful
o In case of alternative indicators for a single parameter:
Which indicator should be kept and which one removed?
o Additionally, which Ministry/department in each nation is
responsible for reporting on each indicator?
31
SCP Indicator Selection:
Country page template
Indicator Name Indicator
description
Reason for Indicator Inclusion
SDG Y/N
SDG #
Int. body
Available in Country
Time Coverage
Last available data year
baseline value
Unit
Reporting body in
the Country
Nationally-sourced
value
Contact Details
NOTES/ COMMENTS
LAND USE
Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture
Measures the share of a country's total agricultural area that is under productive and sustainable agriculture.
Measures progress in the extent to which sustainable agricultural production activities are being put in place in a country, over time.
Y 2.4.1 FAO Yes 1971-2012
2012 5.7 % MoAgr. 6.2 Name email
Useful not useful unavailable
Thank You! Alessandro Galli Magali Outters [email protected]