october 23, 2015 william r. emmons federal reserve bank of st. louis [email protected]...
TRANSCRIPT
October 23, 2015
William R. EmmonsFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
These comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or
the Federal Reserve System.
The Economy in 2020:Growth or Stagnation?
1
21st Annual APTC Property Tax
Seminar
2
The Economy in 2020:Growth or Stagnation?
My prediction: Both—it depends on how you define it. A global growth paradox
Living standards are rising around the world. The U.S. (and other rich countries’) share of world population is
shrinking; the poorest countries are growing fastest. The paradox: Despite growth in living standards everywhere,
the median global citizen may be poorer in 2020 than today.
U.S. economy in 2020: Growth and stagnation Overall U.S. economic output will be larger in 2020. The rewards are going increasingly to a few demographic
groups defined by age, education and race or ethnicity. The fastest-growing parts of U.S. population are benefiting less. Our home-grown growth paradox:
Living standards are likely to stagnate for the “typical” citizen even though overall GDP and wealth are increasing.
3
Vast Differences in the Standard of Living Around the World
Source: International Monetary Fund, 2009
Median per-capita income in U.S. dollars
Rich countries
Middle-income countries
Poor countries
4
Economic Growth Generally is Faster in Countries that Are Poorer
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, April 2015
Rich countries Less-developed countries
5
U.S. Share of World Population Is In Decline
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Percent
6
Population is Slow-Growing or Stagnant in Other Advanced Economies, Too
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Percent
7
Populations in Less-Developed Countries Are Growing Faster
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Percent
8
Fastest Population Growth in the Least-Developed Countries (Africa and S. Asia)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Percent
9
Split the world into three regions Advanced (rich) countries Developing (middle-income) countries Least-developed (poor) countries
Highlight two countervailing trends at work Incomes grow fast in poor countries, raising average incomes
locally and globally. Population also grows fast in poor countries, lowering mean and
median global incomes (because more poor people get counted).
Which force will win—rising quality or quantity of poor people? Income must grow very fast in poor countries to offset the relative
shrinkage of population in rich countries. From a global perspective, adding a person with $1,000 annual
income—even if it is growing fast—cannot offset the “loss” of a person making a stagnant $50,000 income.
Hypothetical Illustration of the Global Growth Paradox
10
The Global Growth Paradox: A Race Between Income and Population Growth
Source: International Monetary Fund, 2009
Median per-capita income in U.S. dollars
Rich countries: Slow
population growth
Middle-income countries: Moderate population
growth
Poor countries: Fast population
growth
11
Dollars (log
scale)
A Simulated Example With 100 People in the World
People in rich
countries (17% of global
population)
People in middle-income countries
(70% of global population)
People in poor countries (13% of global population)
People ranked by income within their country group (highest to lowest)
12
Income Rankings Are Similar Using Mean or Median
2015 2020 Percent changeAdvanced countries’ mean income $195,622 Middle countries’ mean income $60,150 Poor countries’ mean income $38,462
Advanced countries’ median income $57,648 Middle countries’ median income $560 Poor countries’ median income $26
Global mean income $80,361 Global median income $1,983
13
Dollars (log
scale)
2020 Scenario: Income Grows in Every Region; Population Shifts from Rich to Poor
People in rich
countries (13% of global
population)
People in middle-income countries
(70% of global population)
People in poor countries (17% of global population)
People ranked by income within their country group (highest to lowest)
14
Mean and Median Incomes Grow Faster in Middle and Poor Countries
2015 2020 Percent changeAdvanced countries’ mean income $195,622 $240,071 22.7 Middle countries’ mean income $60,150 $90,226 50.0 Poor countries’ mean income $38,462 $86,674 125.4
Advanced countries’ median income $57,648 $58,320 1.2 Middle countries’ median income $560 $840 50.0 Poor countries’ median income $26 $40 56.3
Global mean income $80,361 ?? ??Global median income $1,983 ?? ??
15
Global Mean Income Increases...
2015 2020 Percent changeAdvanced countries’ mean income $195,622 $240,071 22.7 Middle countries’ mean income $60,150 $90,226 50.0 Poor countries’ mean income $38,462 $86,674 125.4
Advanced countries’ median income $57,648 $58,320 1.2 Middle countries’ median income $560 $840 50.0 Poor countries’ median income $26 $40 56.3
Global mean income $80,361 $105,635 31.5Global median income $1,983 ?? ??
16
...But Global Median Income Declines
2015 2020 Percent changeAdvanced countries’ mean income $195,622 $240,071 22.7 Middle countries’ mean income $60,150 $90,226 50.0 Poor countries’ mean income $38,462 $86,674 125.4
Advanced countries’ median income $57,648 $58,320 1.2 Middle countries’ median income $560 $840 50.0 Poor countries’ median income $26 $40 56.3
Global mean income $80,361 $105,635 31.5Global median income $1,983 $1,694 -14.6
17
You are a pet lover. Last year you owned one cat and two dogs. Your cat weighed 8 pounds; each dog weighed 12 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 10.7 lbs.; median weight of pets = 12 lbs.
What‘s Going On Here?My Pet Example
18
You are a pet lover. Last year you owned one cat and two dogs. Your cat weighed 8 pounds; each dog weighed 12 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 10.7 lbs.; median weight of pets = 12 lbs.
Today you own two heavier cats and one heavier dog. Your cats weigh 10 pounds each; your dog weighs 14 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 11.3 lbs.; median weight of pets = 10 lbs.
What‘s Going On Here?My Pet Example
19
You are a pet lover. Last year you owned one cat and two dogs. Your cat weighed 8 pounds; each dog weighed 12 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 10.7 lbs.; median weight of pets = 12 lbs.
Today you own two heavier cats and one heavier dog. Your cats weigh 10 pounds each; your dog weighs 14 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 11.3 lbs.; median weight of pets = 10 lbs.
Results of growing animals and changing mix The mean weight of all of your pets increased (10.7 to 11.3 lbs.). The mean weight of both your cats and your dogs increased (cats
increased from 8 to 10 lbs., dogs from 12 to 14 lbs.). But the median weight of your pets decreased.
What‘s Going On Here?My Pet Example
20
You are a pet lover. Last year you owned one cat and two dogs. Your cat weighed 8 pounds; each dog weighed 12 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 10.7 lbs.; median weight of pets = 12 lbs.
Today you own two heavier cats and one heavier dog. Your cats weigh 10 pounds each; your dog weighs 14 pounds. Mean weight of pets = 11.3 lbs.; median weight of pets = 10 lbs.
Results of growing animals and changing mix The mean weight of all of your pets increased (10.7 to 11.3 lbs.). The mean weight of both your cats and your dogs increased (cats
increased from 8 to 10 lbs., dogs from 12 to 14 lbs.). But the median weight of your pets decreased.
The key point An adverse change in the composition of the group can reverse
overall trends that occur in each of the individual groups.
What‘s Going On Here?My Pet Example
21
Back to the Hypothetical Example of the Global Growth Paradox
Dollars (log
scale)
Median
= 50th percentile
Ranking of all people in the world (highest to lowest)
2015 global income distribution
22
2020 Income Distribution Lies Above 2015 Distribution At the Top—Rich Get Richer
Dollars (log
scale)
Median
= 50th percentile
2020 global income distribution
2015 global income distribution
Ranking of all people in the world (highest to lowest)
23
But the Growing Number of Poor People Pulls Down the Median
Dollars (log
scale)
Median
= 50th percentile
Global income ranking (highest to lowest)
2015 global income distribution
24
2020 Median Global Income Is Below 2015 Median Global Income
Dollars (log
scale)
Median
= 50th percentile
Global income ranking (highest to lowest)
2020 global income distribution
2015 global income distribution
25
So Will the World Be Richer in 2020 Than It Is Today?
Yes and no. Within each country or even within groups of similar countries,
it is likely that both mean and median income and wealth will be higher in 2020 than in 2015.
But the composition of the world’s population is changing. Poor countries are growing fast both in terms of income and
population. Rich countries are growing slowly in both income and
population terms.
It is possible that global mean income (and top incomes) will increase while global median income stagnates or declines.
26
The U.S. Version of the Global Growth Paradox
Income and wealth are likely to increase in the U.S. between 2015 and 2020 as measured by Overall means = real GDP and real household wealth. Sub-group means and medians (many but not all).
But overall median income and median wealth may stagnate or decline, as they have for many years. Overall (mean) income and wealth are likely to grow slowly. Some low-income and low-wealth groups are growing in size.
How you ask the question determines how you answer it The approach I have been pursuing: The demographics of
income and wealth. Key demographics: Birth year, age, education, race or ethnicity. Prediction: Young, less-educated and non-white Americans will
continue to struggle as they become a larger share of population.
Annual Growth in Real GDPPercent
5-Year Moving Average Annual Growth in Real GDPPercent
20151005009590Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis /Haver Analytics
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3 27
The U.S. Economy Will Continue to Grow—But More Slowly
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Annual data through 2014
Percent
Last year of 3% growth: 2005
Average annualized real-GDP growth,
2006-14:1.4%
Growth Rate of Real Potential GDPPercent
Contribution of Labor Input to Real-GDP GrowthPercent
3025201510050095908580757065605550Source: Congressional Budget Office /Haver Analytics
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 28
The US Economy‘s “Speed Limit“ Has Declined to 2 Percent
Source: Congressional Budget Office Projections as of Aug. 25, 2015
Percent
Growth rate of real potential GDP
History CBO forecast
Contribution to GDP growth of
labor inputs
Growth Rate of Real Potential GDPPercent
Contribution of Labor Input to Real-GDP GrowthPercent
3025201510050095908580757065605550Source: Congressional Budget Office /Haver Analytics
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 29
Contributions of Both Productivity and Labor Input Have Declined
Source: Congressional Budget Office Projections as of Aug. 25, 2015
Percent
Contribution to GDP growth of productivity
improvements
Contribution to GDP growth of
labor inputs
Growth rate of real potential GDP
History CBO forecast
30
An Important Reason Labor Inputs are Slowing—Shrinking Share of Youth
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Percent
Contribution of Productivity Improvements to Real-GDP GrowthPercent
Contribution of Labor Input to Real-GDP GrowthPercent
3025201510050095908580757065605550Source: Haver Analytics
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 31
Productivity Growth Should Return to Normal; Population Growth is Slow
Source: Congressional Budget Office Projections as of Aug. 25, 2015
Percent
Contribution to GDP growth of productivity
improvementsContribution to GDP growth of
labor inputs
History CBO forecast
3-Month Nominal T-Bill Yield Implied 20 Years in the FuturePercent
3-Month Inflation-Adjusted T-Bill Yield Implied 20 Years in the FuturePercent
2015100500Source: Federal Reserve Board /Haver Analytics
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 32
Confirming Evidence: Investors Expect Very Low Interest Rates for Many Years
Aug. 28, 2015:3.57%
nominal short-term
yield in 2035
Percent
Aug. 28, 2015:1.45% real short-term
yield in 2025
Source: Federal Reserve Board Daily data through Aug. 28, 2015
Real Household WealthAverage level in 1995 equals 100
Real GDP With CBO Forecast through 2025Average level in 1995 equals 100
25201510050095908580757065605550Source: Haver Analytics
240200
160
120
80
40
20
10
240200
160
120
80
40
20
10 33
Real Household Wealth Likely to Grow Slowly
Sources: Congressional Budget Office, Federal Reserve Board Projections as of Aug. 25, 2015
Index values equal 100 in
1995
Real household wealth
Real GDP
34
Mean Income Grew Overall and for Most Demographic Groups, 1989-2013
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
35
Mean Wealth Grew Overall and for Most Demographic Groups, 1989-2013
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
36
Median Income Growth Was Weak During 1989-2013, Hinting At Composition Effects
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
37
Median Wealth Declined Overall and for Several Groups, 1989-2013
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
38
This Pattern Likely to Continue—Typical Family Struggles Despite Overall Growth
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
39
Clearest Illustration of the Growth Paradox in the U.S.—Race and Ethnicity
Virtually all measures of income and wealth have increased for each major racial and ethnic group, 1989-2013.
But overall measures of median income and median wealth—representing the experience of the “typical” American family—have declined.
How? The low-income and low-wealth parts of the population increased as share of the total.
This pattern is likely to continue.
40
Overall Median Income and Wealth Stagnated While Most Groups Enjoyed Growth
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Percent
41
The Non-White Population is Growing Faster than the White Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
People
42
Non-White Groups Generally Have Lower Incomes and Wealth than Whites
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Dollars
43
Non-White Groups Generally Have Lower Incomes and Wealth than Whites
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Dollars
44
Non-White Groups Generally Have Lower Incomes and Wealth than Whites
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Dollars
45
Non-White Groups Generally Have Lower Incomes and Wealth than Whites
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Dollars
46
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 1940
0.4%
1.5%
9.8%
88.3%
47
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 1970
1%
4%
11%
84%
48
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2000
6%
13%
12%
69%
49
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2010
7%
16%
13%
64%
50
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2020
6%
19%
14%
61%
51
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2030
7%
22%
14%
57%
52
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2040
8%
25%
14%
53%
53
Non-White Groups Represent Increasing Shares of the Population
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances
Share of population
Share in 2050
9%
27%
15%
49%
54
In Sum: Will the U.S. and Global Economies Be Richer in 2020?
Yes and no—total and average (mean) incomes and wealth will be greater than today.
But the typical (median) U.S. and global citizen may be no better off.
Source of the global and U.S. “growth paradoxes:” A race between economic improvement and fast growth in the number of disadvantaged citizens.
Our national and global challenges: Increase the overall growth rate. Make growth more inclusive so it benefits the least-well-
off as much as possible. Broaden the public debate to focus on median as well as
mean measures of economic progress.