officialising language...1 officialising language a discourse study of language politics in the...

14
1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University August 2001

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

1

OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE

A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS

IN THE UNITED STATES

Joseph Lo Bianco

A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University

August 2001

Page 2: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

I certify that the work contained in this thesis is original and references to others’ material is cited in the bibliography. Joseph Lo Bianco

2

Page 3: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I wish to place on record my gratitude to the National Foreign Language Center, Johns Hopkins

University (now University of Maryland) Washington DC for awarding me an Andrew W. Mellow

Fellowship in 1995 that facilitated my collection of data during the 104th Congress. My time there

coincided with the presence of Bernard Spolsky (Bar-Ilan University), Elana Shohamy (Tel Aviv

University) and Thom Huebner (San Jose State University) . To these people and to Dick Brecht, the

late Ron Walton and David Maxwell I want to say thanks for many engaging conversations, inspiration

and guidance. I also would like to acknowledge Donna Christian of the Center for Applied Linguistics,

Washington DC and my many ‘CAL pals’ for their support, interest and friendship. David Edwards

and Cindy McMillan of the Joint National Committee for Languages were generous in making available

documents from the early history of the present phase of the official English movement. Thank you also

to Joan Rubin and James Crawford for many fascinating discussions and for friendship. The late

Charlene Sato, Kathy Davis, Mike Long and the Graduate Program from the University of Hawaii at

Honolulu helped me in ways they may not recall. I have greatly benefitted by attendance at

conferences of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (Atlanta, Long Beach, Orlando,

Vancouver and St Louis) and on these occasions I have gained from the input of Richard Ruiz, Terry

Wiley, Tom Ricento and Helen Moore. A visit to Stanford University as a guest of Joshua Fishman was

extremely enlightenening. Thanks to you and Gella too.

My colleagues at Language Australia: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia

deserve recognition (if only for continually asking me when it would be finished). Maurice Nevile was

extremely helpful in reading the work in progress and suggesting many improvements. Of course, my

thesis supervisor Barry Hindess, and committee members Tony Liddicoat and John Dryzek deserve

warm recognition for their interest, encouragement and many good suggestions. Barry for politics,

Tony for linguistics and John for Q. Peter Freebody provided helpful input as well.

A special thank you to Nicky, Hana and Sofia for enduring it all and to nonna, as always.

I should make a special mention of the interviewees who were keen to have me understand their role

and ideas in American language policy activism. Two particularly generous members of US English

deserve an anonymous expression of gratitude for the meals, drinks and home visits to meet the ‘fam’.

These extended times helped me to better appreciate those who describe themselves as ‘ordinary

members’ and who are committed to bringing in an English law. To those who fervently oppose official

3

Page 4: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

English I can only thank them for opening their doors and minds in equal measure of friendship and

collegiality.

To those 54 people who allowed me to take more than an hour and half of their time for the Q-analysis

sessions I am especially grateful. This is well beyond what an interviewer would normally expect of an

interviewee however Q-methodology is valuable precisely because of its greater depth of penetration

and because the ‘respondents’ represent their subjective orientation to the issue with minimal shaping

and influence from the researcher. My ‘respondents’ (with only one exception) appreciated this and I

thank them for that (even the recalcitrant).

To the interviewees, those who spoke directly with me about their views I also say thank you. I found

members of Congress and their staffers especially generous with their time given that I came from far

away and would not remain to participate in the issues. All my American colleagues were by turns

helpful, interested and collegial (even indulgent when this was required). I hope that I have done justice

to you.

I enrolled in the thesis program at The Australian National University as a part-time candidate in May

1995. Most of the research and writing was conducted in between direct involvement in language

policy work in Australia, in Scotland and in Sri Lanka. This ‘reality’ language planning underscored

the wide relevance of language issues in very different societies, and how language planning carries

national aspirations, cultural politics, socially transforming ideologies and various kinds of resistance,

nationing principles and globalising force. It is natural that ‘language people’ see the overwhelming

relevance of the language question, we trip over it everywhere and it seems that nothing could be more

important. It is ‘arresting’ when ‘non-language people’ tell us that language issues are neither important

nor interesting. Fortunately we know they are wrong. Not all of the research and writing has been hard

slog fitted in between earning the daily bread. Some of it was wonderfully idyllic: three months

mountain biking in the wooded hills of Siena Italy writing about American language policy in the

evenings, a great time in marvellous Washington DC in 1995 with return visits every 18 months; long

cool evenings writing by the banks of the Mahaweli outside Kandy Sri Lanka, while grappling with

language politics in that (very much harder) setting, and a great time coming to know the remarkable

scene in post-devolution Scotland. There are many people in all these places that I will have forgotten

to thank, and many who helped without knowing or intending to do so; so to everyone I have had a

conversation with since May 1995 I say: Mille Grazie!

4

Page 5: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

DEDICATION

Antonia Ferraro and Vincenzo Lo Bianco

5

Page 6: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

ABSTRACT

This is a study of the discourse contest concerning the officialisation of English in the United States. It consists of an analysis of the language of that discourse shaped by a belief that discourse is a rather neglected but potentially illuminating area of examination of language and literacy policy. The study seeks to understand the processes and content of language policy as it is being made, or performed, and is influenced by a critique of the theory and practice of language policy which tends to adopt technicist paradigms of examination that insufficiently elucidate the politics of the field. Accordingly a systematic gathering of the texts of language disputation in the US was collected. These texts were organised in response to the methods of elicitation. Semi-elicited texts, elicited texts and unelicited texts were gathered and tested to be sure that they constituted a fair representation of the concourse (what had been said and was being said about the issue) over a 15 year period. Those statements, or texts, that had particular currency during the 104th Congress were selected for further use. An empirical examination of the subjective dispositions of those activists involved in the making of official English, or of resisting the making of official English, was conducted. This examination utilised the Q methodology (inverted factor analysis) invented by William Stephensen. The data from this study provided a rich field of knowledge about the discursive parameters of the making of policy in synchronic and diachronic form. Direct interviews were also conducted with participants, and discourse analysis of ‘naturally occurring’ (unelicited texts) speeches and radio debates and other material of persuasion and disagreement was conducted. These data frame and produce a representation of the orders of discourse and their dynamic and shaping power. Against an analysis of language policy making and a document analysis of the politics of language in the United States the discourses are utilised to contribute to a richer understanding of the field and the broad conclusion that as far as language policy is concerned it is hardly possible to make a distinction with political action. The theoretical implications for a reinvigorated language policy theory constitute the latter part of the thesis. In the multi-epistemological context that postmodernity demands, with its skepticism about the possibility of ‘disinterest’, the thesis offers its own kinds of data triangulation, and the making central of subjective dispositions and political purposes and engagements of the principal anatagonists.

6

Page 7: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 3 DEDICATION..................................................................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................................................... 6

CHAPTER OUTLINE ..................................................................................................................................... 13

CHAPTER I.......................................................................................................................................................... 15

‘LANGUAGE’ & ‘PLANNING’........................................................................................................................... 15 IMPROBABILITY OF OFFICIAL ENGLISH ................................................................................................. 15

Why official English? ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Lpp & Its Critics............................................................................................................................................. 21

LPP IN PRACTICE ................................................................................................................................................. 25 Lpp & Language Praxis ................................................................................................................................. 27 Interested Lpp ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Officialising Language................................................................................................................................... 30

THEORISING THE SIGN................................................................................................................................. 33 Relativism & Language Ideology................................................................................................................... 38 God, Linguists & Everyone Else .................................................................................................................... 41 Modernity Critique......................................................................................................................................... 43 Discourse and Identity ................................................................................................................................... 48 Can Discourse Be Planned? ......................................................................................................................... 52 Ideology & Plans............................................................................................................................................ 53

CHAPTER SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER II ........................................................................................................................................................ 58

THE AMERICAN SCENE.................................................................................................................................. 58 ADVERSARIAL LEGALISM .......................................................................................................................... 58

Constitutionalism ........................................................................................................................................... 59 The Federalist Papers .................................................................................................................................... 61

SPHERES........................................................................................................................................................... 63 Jurisdiction..................................................................................................................................................... 63 Sovereignty..................................................................................................................................................... 63 Influence......................................................................................................................................................... 64

AMERICAN CONTEXTS................................................................................................................................. 65 PERIODISING NEVER-THE-LESS................................................................................................................ 66

First Nations .................................................................................................................................................. 72 The Colonial Period....................................................................................................................................... 74 Revolution ...................................................................................................................................................... 76 Expansion....................................................................................................................................................... 77 The Huddled Masses ...................................................................................................................................... 79 Americanisation ............................................................................................................................................. 83 Emulating Old Nations................................................................................................................................... 86 Global Era...................................................................................................................................................... 89 Language Ideology......................................................................................................................................... 91 Spanish Hemisphere....................................................................................................................................... 94 216 Years Later.............................................................................................................................................. 96 Changing the Past .......................................................................................................................................... 98 Civilisation & Culture Fragments.................................................................................................................. 99 (The) Great American Tradition (-s)............................................................................................................ 101

POLICY DOMAINS........................................................................................................................................ 104 Voting ........................................................................................................................................................... 105 Educating in English Plus One .................................................................................................................... 107

7

Page 8: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Foreign & Truly Foreign Languages........................................................................................................... 117 Swearing In Citizens .................................................................................................................................... 119

THE PAST AS PROLOGUE........................................................................................................................... 122 CHAPTER III .................................................................................................................................................... 123

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 123 APPROACHING THE PROBLEM................................................................................................................. 123

Interdisciplinary Conceptual Map ............................................................................................................... 125 CORPUS & DATA SOURCES....................................................................................................................... 125

Q-Methodology Study Of Activists & Aware Elites...................................................................................... 126 Radio & Advocatory Texts ........................................................................................................................... 129 Proponents, Opponents & Observers........................................................................................................... 131 Thoughts about Arguments .......................................................................................................................... 133 Acting Language .......................................................................................................................................... 135 Description................................................................................................................................................... 137 Following rules ............................................................................................................................................ 138 Observation.................................................................................................................................................. 139 Elicitation..................................................................................................................................................... 139

THE DATA CHAPTERS ................................................................................................................................ 140 CHAPTER IV..................................................................................................................................................... 142

ACTIVIST SUBJECTIVITY............................................................................................................................ 142 ATTITUDES, BELIEFS & IDEOLOGIES ..................................................................................................... 142 TEXTS AND DISCOURSE ............................................................................................................................ 143 Q....................................................................................................................................................................... 145

Construction of Q-sample ............................................................................................................................ 146 Q-Research Process ..................................................................................................................................... 149 Q-Sorts ......................................................................................................................................................... 149

DISCOURSES ................................................................................................................................................. 155 Pluribus: Civil Rights, Multilingualism & A Diverse America .................................................................... 155 Unum: Protecting English &Uniting America............................................................................................. 158 Injury............................................................................................................................................................ 160 Always Already............................................................................................................................................. 161 E Pluribus Unum and Other Problems ........................................................................................................ 163 Narrating...................................................................................................................................................... 166

FROM SUBJECTIVITY TO POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT ......................................................................... 168 CHAPTER V ...................................................................................................................................................... 169

RADIO TEXTS & WRITING ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 169 DISCOURSE ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................... 169 TRANSCRIPT ONE: FRED FISKE SATURDAY ......................................................................................... 169

Analysis Of Text ........................................................................................................................................... 169 Framing The Issue ....................................................................................................................................... 169 The Taxpayer................................................................................................................................................ 170 Molly-coddled Spanish speakers.................................................................................................................. 170 What about the Greeks and Russians?......................................................................................................... 170 Sneak attacks................................................................................................................................................ 170 Splitting at the seams ................................................................................................................................... 170 Getting somebody a job................................................................................................................................ 170 Segregation .................................................................................................................................................. 171 Evil and Racist ............................................................................................................................................. 171 At each others’ throats ................................................................................................................................. 171 Things are separating .................................................................................................................................. 171 Ridicule ........................................................................................................................................................ 171

8

Page 9: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Framing the public...................................................................................................................................... 171 What the public said..................................................................................................................................... 172 Ellen ............................................................................................................................................................. 174 Patricia......................................................................................................................................................... 174 John.............................................................................................................................................................. 174 Gail............................................................................................................................................................... 175 Sue................................................................................................................................................................ 175 Catherine...................................................................................................................................................... 175 Charles ......................................................................................................................................................... 176 Denuda......................................................................................................................................................... 176 Camille ......................................................................................................................................................... 176 Edward ......................................................................................................................................................... 177 Joe ................................................................................................................................................................ 177 Mary ............................................................................................................................................................. 177

TRANSCRIPT TWO: THE DIANNE REHM SHOW.................................................................................... 177 Framing The Issue ....................................................................................................................................... 178 Framing The Debate .................................................................................................................................... 178 Framing The Participants ............................................................................................................................ 178 Framing The Claims .................................................................................................................................... 178 Overall Organisation ................................................................................................................................... 179 Turns 4-22 .................................................................................................................................................... 180 Turns 22-80 .................................................................................................................................................. 182 Ronald: It’s Straight out Racism.................................................................................................................. 187 Charles: America is a Sovereign Place........................................................................................................ 187 Dennis: The Canada Card ........................................................................................................................... 188 Who ‘we’ is................................................................................................................................................... 188 Who ‘you’ is ................................................................................................................................................. 189

TRANSCRIPT THREE: IT IS YOUR BUSINESS......................................................................................... 189 What costs .................................................................................................................................................... 190 In five years time .......................................................................................................................................... 190 Metonymic reference.................................................................................................................................... 190 What binds.................................................................................................................................................... 190 Kinds of Equality.......................................................................................................................................... 190

TRANSCRIPT FOUR: SAVING AMERICAN CIVILISATION................................................................... 191 NEWT GINGRICH.......................................................................................................................................... 191

The Argument............................................................................................................................................... 195 The Problem................................................................................................................................................. 196 The Solution ................................................................................................................................................. 196 Agentless Passives........................................................................................................................................ 198 Hard Work.................................................................................................................................................... 198 Dates Without Time...................................................................................................................................... 198 Hard Verbs & Metaphors............................................................................................................................. 199 Infantilisation ............................................................................................................................................... 199 Denigrated Neutrals..................................................................................................................................... 200 Trivialisation ................................................................................................................................................ 200

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM HERE? ............................................................................................................... 200 CHAPTER VI..................................................................................................................................................... 202

THE INTERVIEW EVIDENCE ...................................................................................................................... 202 What Is The Problem?.................................................................................................................................. 202 The Importance Of Being Ernesto................................................................................................................ 203 A Double Standard?..................................................................................................................................... 205 Two-Language Education ............................................................................................................................ 206 The Meanings Of Things .............................................................................................................................. 207 Quebec, Salad Bowls & Melting Pots .......................................................................................................... 207 Being Smart.................................................................................................................................................. 208

9

Page 10: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

The American Century or The Great Society ............................................................................................... 209 Scope & Limits ............................................................................................................................................. 209 Citizenship & Sacredness............................................................................................................................. 210 What The Founding Fathers (Would Have) Said........................................................................................ 211 Lingua Mundi............................................................................................................................................... 212 What’s “Behind” It? .................................................................................................................................... 212 If Language Isn’t The Glue? ........................................................................................................................ 213 If It’s Symbolic What Does It Symbolise? .................................................................................................... 213 Linguistic Civil Rights & Linguistic Welfare ............................................................................................... 214 Tractability................................................................................................................................................... 215 Snouts In Public Troughs............................................................................................................................. 215 National, Official, Convenient Or Common?............................................................................................... 216 Being & Becoming ....................................................................................................................................... 216 Milking Cash Cows ...................................................................................................................................... 217 Azatlan & All That ....................................................................................................................................... 218 Difference & The American Dream ............................................................................................................. 218 The Nature Of Things................................................................................................................................... 219 Child Abuse .................................................................................................................................................. 219 The England Legacy..................................................................................................................................... 220 Hemispheric Spanish.................................................................................................................................... 220 Protecting English........................................................................................................................................ 220 Do They Really Want To Learn English?..................................................................................................... 221 Patriotism..................................................................................................................................................... 221 La Raza ........................................................................................................................................................ 222 How To Do It................................................................................................................................................ 222 The Mandate ................................................................................................................................................ 223 There’s Always Someone Dumping On A Good Idea .................................................................................. 223

CHAPTER OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 223 CHAPTER VII................................................................................................................................................. 227

THEORISING IN A POST-POSITIVIST TIME ............................................................................................ 227 Intellectual Mapping of LPP........................................................................................................................ 229

HISTORY, DEFINITIONS AND PROBLEMS.............................................................................................. 231 Language Problems ..................................................................................................................................... 233 Problems With Problems.............................................................................................................................. 236

KEY APPROACHES ...................................................................................................................................... 238 Haugen-Kloss............................................................................................................................................... 238 Neustupny..................................................................................................................................................... 239 Fishman........................................................................................................................................................ 241

PARENT DISCIPLINES ................................................................................................................................. 242 Language Science ........................................................................................................................................ 242 Grounded Semiotics ..................................................................................................................................... 243 Acts Of Identity............................................................................................................................................. 244

PRESSURES IMPACTING ON LPP THEORY............................................................................................... 246 De-Reification Of Language ........................................................................................................................ 246 De-Fenestration Of Linguistics.................................................................................................................... 247 New Signs..................................................................................................................................................... 248 Homo Economicus ....................................................................................................................................... 251

DIRECTIONS IN NEW THEORY ................................................................................................................. 253 Bellhops, Busboys & Maids-Forever ........................................................................................................... 254 Policy Performance As An Extended Speech Act......................................................................................... 256

REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................... 261

APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................................... 285 APPENDIX 1:FACTORS RESULTING FROM VARIMAX ROTATION ........................................................................ 285 APPENDIX 2: SOURCES OF Q-STATEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 287

10

Page 11: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

APPENDIX 2: CHARACTERISTICS OF Q-STUDY PARTICIPANTS ........................................................................... 289 APPENDIX 3: INTERVIEWEES AND DATES/LOCATIONS OF INTERVIEWS ............................................................. 290 APPENDIX 4: Q RESPONDENTS QUESTIONNAIRE............................................................................................... 292 APPENDIX 5: QUASI-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF Q-SORTS............................................................................... 293 APPENDIX 6: TRANSCRIPT ONE: FRED FISKE SATURDAY ................................................................ 294

Part One: Fiske & Guest.............................................................................................................................. 294 Part Two: Guest, Moderator & Callers ....................................................................................................... 300

APPENDIX 7: TRANSCRIPT TWO: THE DIANNE REHM SHOW........................................................... 306 Part One: Moderator, Proponent & Opponent............................................................................................ 306 Part Two: Moderator, Guests & Callers...................................................................................................... 309

APPENDIX 8: TRANSCRIPT THREE: IT IS YOUR BUSINESS ................................................................ 311 Moderator, Republicans, Democrats, Chamber Of Commerce ................................................................... 311

APPENDIX 9: TRANSCRIPT FOUR: ENGLISH AS THE AMERICAN LANGUAGE ............................................... 317 APPENDIX 10: THE INTERVIEW DATA ORGANISED BY THEME ......................................................................... 319 APPENDIX 11:TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS AND AUSTRALIAN ENGLISH STYLE ........................................... 361 APPENDIX 12: ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................ 363

END NOTES....................................................................................................................................................... 364

11

Page 12: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE ONE: CATEGORIES OF LANGUAGE/COMMUNICATION COMMUNITIES ........................................................ 67 FIGURE TWO: DICKER’S LANGUAGE POLICY TENDENCIES ..................................................................................... 68 FIGURE THREE: WILEY’S OVERT AND COVERT POLICY PERIODS ........................................................................... 70 FIGURE FOUR: COLLINS’ PHASES OF LITERACY ECONOMY .................................................................................... 71 FIGURE FIVE: MAJOR LEGISLATIVE MILESTONES IN US IMMIGRATION.................................................................. 81 FIGURE SIX: RICENTO’S ‘DEEP VALUES’ OF AMERICAN LINGUISTIC CULTURE...................................................... 92 FIGURE SEVEN: IDEOLOGY, DISCOURSE, ATTITUDES AND POLITICS...................................................................... 93 FIGURE EIGHT: LIND’S AMERICAN CULTURAL REPUBLICS.................................................................................. 104 FIGURE NINE: MODELS OF LINGUISTIC EDUCATION FOR MINORITY LANGUAGE CHILDREN................................ 108 FIGURE TEN: DATA SOURCES, CHARACTERISTICS & LOCATIONS ......................................................................... 126 FIGURE ELEVEN: ARCHIVE OF DISCOURSE ANALYSIS MATERIAL ......................................................................... 131 FIGURE TWELVE: COMMUNICATIVE ACTION & OTHER TYPES OF ACTION........................................................... 136 FIGURE THIRTEEN: HABERMAS’ SOCIAL ACTION & PURPOSIVE ACTIVITY.......................................................... 137 FIGURE FOURTEEN: TEXT ELICITATION PATTERN ................................................................................................. 140 FIGURE FIFTEEN: FAIRCLOUGH’S TEXT>DISCURSIVE PRACTICE>SOCIAL PRACTICE MODEL............................... 143 FIGURE SIXTEEN: VERB EXPRESSIONS BY POLITICAL DISCOURSE FEATURES...................................................... 147 FIGURE SEVENTEEN: POLITICAL DISCOURSE MATRIX .......................................................................................... 148 FIGURE EIGHTEEN: QUASI-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF Q-SORT ........................................................................... 149 FIGURE NINETEEN: STATEMENT SCORES AND FACTORS....................................................................................... 151 FIGURE TWENTY: IDEAL Q-SORT FOR FACTOR ONE............................................................................................. 157 FIGURE TWENTY-ONE: RESPONDENTS WITH SIGNIFICANT LOADINGS; FACTOR ONE ........................................... 157 FIGURE TWENTY-TWO: IDEAL Q-SORT FOR FACTOR TWO ................................................................................... 159 FIGURE TWENTY-THREE: RESPONDENTS WITH SIGNIFICANT LOADING; FACTOR TWO......................................... 159 FIGURE TWENTY-FOUR: DISCOURSE FEATURES ................................................................................................... 164 FIGURE TWENTY-FIVE: UNDERLYING POLITICAL DISCOURSE FEATURES FOR FACTORS ONE AND TWO............... 165 FIGURE TWENTY-SIX: CALLER FRAMEWORK; FRED FISKE SATURDAY ................................................................ 173 FIGURE TWENTY-SEVEN: POSITION DECLARATIONS; EMERSON & LYONS ........................................................... 179 FIGURE TWENTY-EIGHT: INTERACTIVE COMMENTARY; DIANNE REHM SHOW .................................................... 179 FIGURE TWENTY-NINE: CALLER INTERACTION; RONALD, CHARLES & DENNIS .................................................. 179 FIGURE THIRTY: THEME ORGANISATION; DIANNE REHM SHOW .......................................................................... 180 FIGURE THIRTY-ONE: ARGUMENT STRUCTURE ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 190 FIGURE THIRTY-TWO: PRONOMINAL REFERENCE PATTERN ................................................................................. 197 FIGURE THIRTY-THREE: MAP OF CONCOURSE, DISCOURSES & RELATIONSHIPS .................................................. 226 FIGURE THIRTY-FOUR: RICENTO’S INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OF LPP ................................................................... 230 FIGURE THIRTY-FIVE: NEEDS AND DEFINITIONS: LANGUAGE PROBLEMS ................................................................ 234

12

Page 13: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

CHAPTER OUTLINE

Chapter I Chapter one comprises three sections. The first section addresses the reasons for the selection of official English as the focus of the present research. The second section introduces language policy and planning as a field of both scholarship and intervention, and sets out a series of criticisms to which it has been subjected in recent years. The third section discusses the anomaly of heightened attention to language within the social sciences contrasted to the insecure status of language policy and planning within the academy. Chapter II Chapter two gives a general description of US linguistic demography, the policy framework and periods within which policy work has occurred, and analyses three domains of policy in which official English is involved: voting, bilingual education and citizenship swearing-in ceremonies. Chapter III The methodology for the research is presented in this chapter. Three kinds of data are gathered: texts

that were directly elicited by the researcher, texts that were semi-elicited, and texts that were not in any

way elicited by the researcher. Q-methodology is used to analyse the ‘subjective dispositions’ of key

actors and observers engaged in official English politics. From Q-analysis the overall discourse

formations of official English are identified and these in turn are subjected to analysis. The results are

reported in Chapter IV. Second, there is an examination of three radio debates and a book chapter on

official English. The results appear in Chapter V. The third data source and analysis comprises semi-

structured interviews undertaken with 44 participants in official English politics during the 104th

Congress, and the researcher’s participation in official Hearings at both the Senate and House of

Representatives. This is reported in Chapter VI.

Chapter IV This chapter reports the results of the Q-analysis. 54 participants rank 64 statements that were collected

as a structured sample of what has been said (the concourse) on official English-bilingual education and

multiculturalism over a representative period of 15 years. All of these statements, regardless of who

uttered or wrote them originally, were selected because they were encountered in actual discourse and

argument during the 104th concourse. The resultant discourse organisation of the statements is analysed

at content level and also in relation to its underlying ideological structuring.

Chapter V The first debate is of a single advocate for official English, George Tryfiatis, the debate moderator and

twelve callers. Analysis is undertaken of the language of the advocate, and since he provides extended

exposition of his case the transcript contains the details of long elaborated turns. The advocate

13

Page 14: OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE...1 OFFICIALISING LANGUAGE A DISCOURSE STUDY OF LANGUAGE POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES Joseph Lo Bianco A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

concerned is from the English First organisation, a more radical break-away group from the main US

English organisation. The responses of the callers are discussed in detail because these interrupt,

challenge and sustain the advocate’s arguments and introduce a dialogic component to the essentially

monologic character of the first part. The second debate is a dyad between one of the official English

Congressional sponsors Bill Emerson and a key opponent, Jim Lyons from the National Association for

Bilingual Education. Three callers’ statements are also analysed. The third radio text has a polyadic

format with the US Chamber of Commerce and three Democrat and Republican Congressmen, a

moderator, and an announcer. The final text analysed is a written one, House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s

English as the American Language from his best-selling book To Renew America. This piece located

official English within the overall program of the ‘Conservative Restoration’ that the 104th Congress

represented.

Chapter VI This chapter analyses and presents data under various themes that emerged from the semi-structured

interviews conducted with participants in the arguments/debate/talk on official English in the 104th

Congress. The excerpts refer to the transcripts which are located under corresponding (but not

identical) headings in the appendices. The interview evidence extends the discourse organisation and

arrangements contained in the previous two chapters. At the conclusion of Chapter VI a diagrammatic

representation of the overall argument (policy on the move) is included. This diagram seeks to

represent the totality of the organisation of official English talk and politics as a structure of

specifications within which the performance of the acts of officialising English occur. Thus it is a map

of the ‘officialisation territory’; two sets of claims, both of which preclude compromise and negotiation

and which form the perimeter within which is located a space where dialogue, conversation and

compromise are possible and occurring.

Chapter VII The final chapter returns to the theme of the performance of language policy and planning in discursive

politics. The chapter considers the main theorisations of lpp and how ideology and modernity have

been critiqued in scholarship that has identified dialogical encounter, discourse, as a key site of struggle

and contest in contemporary society. The chapter concludes with implications for a re-invigorated

theory of lpp that employs these insights.

14