offshore wind technology, possibilities and trendsorbit.dtu.dk/files/10143954/session7_3.pdf ·...

General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.

• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Aug 10, 2018

Offshore wind technology, possibilities and trends

Madsen, Peter Hauge; Rasmussen, Flemming; Jensen, Peter Hjuler

Publication date:2009

Link back to DTU Orbit

Citation (APA):Madsen, P. H., Rasmussen, F., & Hjuler Jensen, P. (2009). Offshore wind technology, possibilities and trends[Sound/Visual production (digital)]. Risø International Energy Conference 2009, Roskilde, Denmark, 14/09/2009

http://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/offshore-wind-technology-possibilities-and-trends(5202152e-e340-497e-9f27-655eee0f36fa).html

Offshore wind technology, gy,possibilities and trends

Peter Hauge MadsenFlemming RasmussenPeter Hjuler JensenPeter Hjuler Jensen

Presented at Risø International Energy Conference 2009

Population centres often at the coast

17/04/2008Presentation name2 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark

Abundant resourceAbundant resourceEU27 power from the North Sea


The wind pits of Europe – The North Sea

E ll t i d•Excellent wind resources 10‐11 m/s average

50-100mm/s average

•Manageable water depths

25 50m

p

•Large population densities around it 25-50m

•Vast in size


Available areas - Plans for future offshore wind f i D kfarms in Denmark

• Status 2008 3163 MW 423 • Status 2008 – 3163 MW, 423 MW offshore

• 2009-2012 additional 840 MW offshoreMW offshore

• Report on future Offshore sites, Update of action plan from 1997

• 23 Sites each 44 km2 for a capacity of 4600 MW Wind PowerP d ti 18 TWh j t • Production 18 TWh, or just over 8% of total energy consumption in Denmark or approximately 50% of Danish approximately 50% of Danish electricity consumption


World market for wind energy – 2008 World market for wind energy 2008

Installed Wind Power in the World- Annual and Cumulative -

30,000 150,000

GLOBAL STATUS

20,000

25,000

ar

100,000

125,000

MW

GLOBAL STATUS• 28 GW installed in 2008• 122 GW installed in total

1% ff h 2008

10,000

15,000

MW

per

ye

50,000

75,000

Cum

ulat

ive • ~1% offshore 2008

• ~3.4 % offshore 2013• ~22 % in EU 2020 (40/180

MW)

0

5,000

1983 1990 1995 2000 2008

Year

0

25,000

Source: BTM Consult ApS - March 2009

MW)• 1.3 % of global electricity• Power-consumption

growing 3 3% per yearpdat

e 2008

growing 3.3% per year• Wind power growing 25%

per year• Installed power doubles

rld M

arke

t U

p Installed power doubles every 3 years

• Factor 10 in ~10 years• Goal 2020: 12 %, 1200


Wor Goal 2020: 12 %, 1200

GW

d l i

Short term

Key development issuesDanish MEGAVIND Strategy -June 2008

ffShort term• Cost• Reliability, maintainability,

avaliability

Offshore technology, aiming to:

– develop new concepts for electricalinfrastructure in offshore wind farms

y• Design conditions and process• Validation• Grid integration

– develop design procedures for the turbine, support structure and foundations to reducedesign uncertainty

– develop and optimze concepts for foundationsGrid integration

Medium to long-term• Cost

develop and optimze concepts for foundationsand installation, focusing on depths > 15m

– develop condition monitoring and data acquisition systems to map fault accorences

• Cost• Design methods• Upscaling• Larger waterdepth

and optimize O&M

– improve access and safety

– improve knowledge of geotechnics and • Larger waterdepth• Grid integration• New concepts

geophysics

– develop knowledge on materials with focus oncorrosion


– develop optimal O&M strategies

Costs - Offshore wind farms

Wind Energy – The Facts, EWEA, 2009


Why Offshore Wind Differs fromTraditional Offshoread t o a O s o e

• Offshore Wind Turbines Characteristics– Highly dynamic responseg y y p– Strict eigen frequency requirements– Actively controlled load response– Wind and wake effectsWind and wake effects– Undamped cross-wind vibrations

• Design Considerations– 50-year return period on extreme event50 year return period on extreme event– Wind load dominated (water depth?)– Overall fatigue driven (incl. low cycle)

• Traditional Offshore Structures:• Traditional Offshore Structures:– Passive in their load response– 100-year wave load dominated

Build in structural redundancy– Build-in structural redundancy


Beatrice Offshore Wind Turbine - UK

Wind loads dominated by wake effects

CFD – Large eddysimulation


Influence of wind and wave directionality onfatigue loads at the mudlinefatigue loads at the mudline

1.5

1.2

1.3

1.4

omen

t ran

ge

0 8

0.9

1

1.1

norm

alis

ed e

quiv

alen

t mo

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

1 H

z n

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Wave misalignment [deg]

dMx dMy

Normalised equivalent bending moment t th dli (f 0 33 H )ranges at the mudline (f=0.33 Hz)


Grid integration - Power fluctuations –2 casescases

800

400

500

600

700

wer

(MW

)

HRBHRA

Horns Rev B

Horns Rev A

Djursland Anholt O

Djursland Anholt P

0

100

200

300Pow HRA

HR2HR1Horns Rev

Horns Rev 2

Time

28/1-2000 29/1-2000 30/1-2000 31/1-2000 1/2-2000

800

400

500

600

700w

er (M

W)

DAPDAO

Horns Rev B

Horns Rev A

Djursland Anholt O

Djursland Anholt P

0

100

200

300Pow HR2

HR1Horns Rev

Horns Rev 2

Horns Rev A


Time

28/1-2000 29/1-2000 30/1-2000 31/1-2000 1/2-2000

Connection of offshore wind farmsConnection of offshore wind farmsRadial or meshed

Tradewind - Integrating Wind, Developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power, February 2009


Kriegers Flak new concept for offshore Kriegers Flak – new concept for offshore wind farm connection

Both transmission of power to land grid and exchange of powerexchange of power

Advantages:

Optimal regional economy

Improvement of market

Added security of supplyAdded security of supply

Demonstration of new technology

Pil t j t f th N th Pilot project for the North sea


Developments and innovationDevelopments and innovation

• Upscaling• Soft foundations• Floating• Combined wave and wind• Vertical axis

Gravity causes steadyloads

Aerodynamic loads are~cyclic


UPWIND – EU Integrated project

Objective:Objective:Develop improved design models and verification methods for wind turbine components

• Very Large Wind Turbines

• More Cost Efficient Wind Turbines

• Offshore wind farms of • Offshore wind farms of several hundred MW


Up-ScalingThe wind turbines have 200820082008

250 m Ø

The wind turbines have increased in size – despitephysics

??????????????

Jos BeurskensJos Beurskens

Repower

Jos Beurskens

Repower

Jos Beurskens


WG 4 Foundations and support structuresstructures


UPWIND: Foundations and support structuressupport structures

Monopile Jacket Floating sparMonopile…..Jacket…..

Floating spar


Compliant structures: How do they work?

Design structure such Design structure such that:

Sw(ω)

1st

mode

2nd

mode

–1st mode ‘below’ wave spectrum

[m2s]

spectrum

–2nd mode ‘above’ wave 2 mode above wave spectrum 0

0f [Hz]

31.40

T [s]

0.03 0.06 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.22

15.7 10.5 7.9 6.3 5.2 4.5 [ ]


Concepts for compliant support structures for offshore wind turbines

??

Slender Guyed tower Buoyant towerArticulated

buoyant towerTower with mass trap

Compliant piled tower


Monopiley y y p

b S il dHYWIND concept by StatoilHydro

• 2-5MW pitch controlled windturbineturbine

• Floating spar bouy attached to three mooring lines

• Intended for water depths between120 – 700m.

• Demonstration project withSiemens 2.3MW 10km outside westcoast of Norway.


i ll iHYWIND concept - installation

• HAWC2 was used for the design loads.

• Coupled version of HAWC2 pand SIMO/RIFLEX

• Stand-alone edition of HAWC2


Focus on the HYWIND concept: Vibration Focus on the HYWIND concept: Vibration modes.New vibrations mode occurs for the floating concept1. Horizontal translation (2 modes)0.01Hz2. Rigid body rotation, tilt (2modes) 0.035Hz3 Vertical translation 0 037Hz3. Vertical translation 0.037HzThese modes are more low frequent than the dominating

wave excitation.

F i il h t bi th l tFor a similar on-shore turbine, the lowestNatural frequency is1st tower bending 0 4Hz1 tower bending 0.4Hz


SWAY concept• Downwind rotor• Wire construction to limit tower

load• Single tension leg (Stiff in Single tension leg (Stiff in

torsion)• Special joint bearing to avoid

b di i t i lbending in tension leg• Yaw bearing between tower

bottom and tension legg• Tower shape with non-circular

shapeG a it an ho s stem• Gravity anchor system


Blue H – the first floating turbineBlue H the first floating turbine

• Demonstration project 10km from coast of Italy ongoing• Very sparse information available, but turbine is small and y p ,

construction huge . . .


id C bi d d i dPoseidon – Combined wave and wind

• Wave energy platform• Dimensions are very

large. Three turbines canproduce extra power produce extra power from wind – and contribute to the total damping of motiondamping of motion.


Poseidon


Poseidon: Simulation results

Ongoing work:Ongoing work:

- HAWC2 is coupled to WAMSIM (Code for floating vessel motion, DHI)

- Full aero/hydro/structure simulation for floating platform with threeb l d


turbines are simulated.

Unlimited ressource for offshore wind energy

Conclusions

• Unlimited ressource for offshore wind energy• Rapid growth in installations• EU promotion of offshore developmentEU promotion of offshore development• Engineering challenges• Grid integration of offshore wind a challenge and an

f hopportunity for the power system• Offshore development the key driver for wind power

technology developmenttechnology development• Deep water concepts under way

• Offshore wind is just at the beginning – all options areopen


Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention


offshore wind technology, possibilities and trendsorbit.dtu.dk/files/10143954/session7_3.pdf ·...

Documents