oligoarthritis in young male 17 yowm 3 mos. of b/l knee swelling and pain pain/swelling began...
TRANSCRIPT
Oligoarthritis in Young Male
17 yoWM 3 mos. of B/L knee swelling and pain
Pain/swelling began during hockey workouts. Warmth and
swelling persisted despite rest, mildly improved w/ “coxib”
Also c/o neck and low back pain and “funky nails”
PMHx: ADD, tarsal coalition, Achilles tendinitis
Meds: Adderall, Aleve OTC
Family Hx: mother with psoriasis, father with degenerative
disc disease.
ROS: denies GU, GI, ocular complaints. + hx heel pain
Oligoarthritis in Young Male
Neck: no mass or LN
Chest/CVS; normal
MS: B/L knee effusions;
LOM ankles, + heel pain
Skin: no rash, no psoriasis;
+onycholysis finger nails
LABS: nl CBC, SMA14
ESR 20; CRP: 1.75 mg/dl
HLA-B27 (+)
Diagnosis?
Spondyloarthropathies: Objectives
Understand the unifying features of Spondyloarthropathies
Recognize key presentations for AS, reactive arthritis,
Psoriatic arthritis and enteropathic arthritis
Recognize the importance of HLA-B27 genotype
Describe conventional and new therapies for SpA
Spondyloarthropathies
Seronegative Spondyloarthropathy: a misnomer !! Historically, these disorders were thought to be “variants”
of rheumatoid arthritis, hence the term “seronegative”
SpA definition: A group of inflammatory arthropathies that
share distinctive clinical, radiographic and genetic features.
These diagnoses include: Ankylosing spondylitis Reiter's syndrome (reactive arthritis) Psoriatic arthritis Enteropathic arthritis (Crohns, Ulcerative colitis, Whipples)
Patients not fulfilling criteria for these individually may be
classifed more generally as having a “spondyloarthropathy”
Family of Spondyloarthropathies
AS Undifferentiated
Spondylo-arthropathy
JuvenileSpondylitis
IBD Associated
Arthritis
PsoriaticArthritis
ReactiveArthritis
SAPHOAcute Ant.
Uveitis
Many patients do not fulfill criteria for AS, PsA, Reactive
arthritis (ReA). Criteria needed to Dx undiferentiated SpA.
Spondyloarthropathy: several criteria have been proposed
Key Features: Inflammatory axial arthritis (sacroiliitis and spondylitis) Peripheral arthritis (often asymmetric and oligoarticular) Enthesitis (inflammation at tendinous/ligamentous
insertions) HLA-B27 positivity XRay evidence of erosions + hyperostosis (reactive bone) Extra-axial, Extra-articular Features
Spondyloarthopathies (SpA)
Periarticular: Enthesitis, tendinitis, dactylitis (sausage-digit)
Ocular: Uveitis, Conjunctivitis
Gastrointestinal: Painless oral ulcerations, asymptomatic
gut inflammation,
symptomatic colitis
Genitourinary: urethritis, vaginitis, balanitis
Cardiac: Aortitis, valvular insufficiency, heart block
Cutaneous: keratoderma blennorrhagicum, psoriasis or nail
lesions (onycholysis, dystrophy, pitting).
SpA: Associated Extraarticular Features
Alternate buttock pain
Sacroiliitis
Positive family history
Psoriasis
Inflammatory bowel disease
Urethritis or cervicitis or acute diarrhea occurring within 1
month before the onset of arthritis
SpondyloarthopathiesESSG Criteria*
Inflammatory Spinal Pain
Synovitis(Asymmetrical or
Predominantly lower limbs)
OR
PLUS (One or more of the following:)
* European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group Criteria for Spondyloarthropathy, 1991
Dougados M, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;34(10):1218-1227. Sensitivity 78-88%; Specificity 92-95%
HLA-B27
Class I MHC, important in antigen presenation CD8 T cells
Associated with the spondyloarthropathies: Ankylosing spondylitis, Reiter's syndrome, Psoriatic arthritis, and enteropathic arthritis.
HLA-B27 is a normal gene found in 8% of Caucasians 3-4% of African-Americans, 1% of Orientals.
But not in American Orientals or Koreans
Actual risk of developing AS in ANY HLA-B27(+) person is only 1-2%.
Over 95% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis are B27+
there is 20-30% risk to 1st degree relatives of AS patients
SpA Prevalence by Geographic Region
SpA HLA-B27
Japan (total population) 0.0095% <1.0%
Thailand 0.12% Not available
United States (caucasians) 1-2% 8%
Germany (adults) 1.9% 9.3%
Russia and Alaska 2.0% to 3.4% Not available
Eskimo (adults) 2.5% >20.0%
Hukuda S, et al. Hukuda S, et al. J Rheumatol.J Rheumatol. 2001;28:554-559. 2001;28:554-559.Khan MA. Khan MA. Curr Opin Rheumatol.Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1995;7:263-269. 1995;7:263-269.Khan MA. Khan MA. Ann Intern Med.Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:896-907. 2002;136:896-907.
Spontaneous inflammatory disease in transgenic rats expressing HLA‑B27 and human b2m:An animal model of HLA‑B27‑associated human disorders. Hammer RE, Tauog JD, et al. Cell 63:1099, 1990.
• Lewis rats transfected with human HLA-B27 & B2microglobulin
• Developed diarrhea, colitis, peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, orchitis, nail dz
• B27 manifestations not seen in a sterile environment
Clinical Associations with HLA-B27
Khan MA. Ann Int Med 2002Disorder HLA-B27 (%)
Ankylosing Spondylitis > 90%
Reiter’s syndrome 80%
Juvenile Spondyloarthritis 70%
Inflammatory bowel dz 50%
Psoriatic arthritis With Spondylitis With Peripheral arthritis
50% 15%
Acute Anterior Uveitis 50%
Aortic insuff. w/ heart block 80%
SAPHO 20-30%
Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies - HLA-B27
HLA-B27 may influence disease expression
B27-positive individuals are more likely to have an earlier onset, sacroiliitis, spondylitis, acute anterior uveitis, and a more severe clinical course.
B27-negative patients are more likely to develop peripheral arthropathritis, skin and nail disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.
Thus = Increased risk of spondylitis and uveitis.
HLA-B27 Diagnostic Testing not necessary to diagnose most patients with spondyloarthropathy
(eg Reitier’s, AS). may be useful in diagnosing patients with an incomplete or
undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy. not useful as a screening test for arthritis.
Factors other than HLA-B27
Male dominance: sex hormone dependant?
Age: disease onset in young adults
Monozygotic HLA-B27 (+) twins show Dz penetrance <50%
Navajo and Eskimo Indians have high frequency of HLA-
B27(+) and also ankylosing spondylitis and Reactive arthritis
Haida and Pima Indians have high frequency of HLA-B27(+)
and ankylosing spondylitis, BUT NOT reactive arthritis
Other genes?
Ankylosing Spondylitis in USA
P C P R x1 2 5 ,0 0 0
R h eu m R x1 2 5 ,0 0 0
U n D x - U n R x1 0 0 ,0 0 0
A S3 5 0 ,0 0 0
M ild D z1 7 3 ,0 0 0
M od era te D z3 7 ,0 0 0
S evere D z2 2 ,0 0 0
F u sed1 8 ,0 0 0
Modified New York Criteria for AS
Clinical criteria
Low back pain and stiffness for >3 mo, which improves
with exercise, but is not relieved by rest
Limited lumbar spine motion: in sagittal and frontal planes
Limitations of chest expansion (age/sex standardized)
Radiographic criteria: Requires EITHER Bilateral
sacroiliitis Grade 2 or Unilateral sacroiliitis Gr 3
Definite AS = 1 clinical plus 1 radiographic criteria
Probable AS = 3 clinical criteria and no radiologic criteria or
1 radiologic criterion and no clinical criteria
van der Linden S, et al. van der Linden S, et al. Arthritis Rheum.Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:361-368. 1984;27:361-368.
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
Inflammatory arthritis affects the axial spine: starts in SI & ascends upwards to Cervical Spine
HLA-B27+ > 90% Whites. AS occurs in 1-2% of HLA-B27+ persons (20% risk to 1st degree relatives of AS patients)
More common in Caucasians than African-Americans
Male Predominant disease 5:1 to 10:1 Females:less severe or have asymptomatic Sacroliliitis
Insidious disease onset between 16-30 yrs. Rare after 45 yrs. (Juvenile spondylitis: males >9yrs old)
Triad: Inflammatory back pain, immobility, AM Stiffness
AS: Inflammatory Back Pain
Onset
Before Age 30 yrs.
Insidious onset
AM Stiffness > 60 minutes
Chronicity : Sxs > 3 mos.
Decreases with exercise/activity
Ankylosing SpondylitisDifferentiating Inflammatory vs Mechanical Back Pain
Inflammatory Back Pain Features Mechanical Back Pain
Prolonged > 60min. AM Stiffness Minor < 45 min.
Early AM Max. Pain/Stiffness Late in day
Improves Symptoms Exercise/activity Worsens Symptoms
Chronic Duration Acute or Chronic
9-40 yrs. Age at Onset 20-65 yrs.
Sacroiliitis, Vertebral
ankylosis,
syndesmophytes
Radiographs Osteophytes,
malalignment
Diagnosis is usually delayed 5-7 years.
Mean 7.5 years from onset of LBP to XRay sacroiliitis
Incidental diagnosis often made on XRAYs (pelvis, LS or
thoracic spine, CXR). Will AP radiographs suffice?
Dx made earlier with MRI
Diagnosis suggested by extraspinal manifestations:
enthesitis, uveitis (30-40%), peripheral oligoarthritis
Rarely Late diagnosis with Complications: Spinal fusion,
fracture, cauda equina syndrome, restrictive lung disease,
aortic insufficiency
DX of ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
Spectrum of ASEarlyLBPStiffnessFatigue
Spinal LimitationFunctional limitsNight Pain
SpinalImmobility
Symptoms
Extra-articular Manifestations
OcularSkin/nailEnthesitis
Chronic UveitisIBD
AortitisRestrictive lung Heart block
Severe
Morbidity Mortality
PainFunctional limitation
AS complicationsDrug toxicityComorbidities
FractureDeath
Disease Progression
SacroiliitisHip DzSpondylitisPeripheral Dz
Cervical DzBamboo Spine
ModerateOnset
Ankylosing Spondylitis: X-rays
Sacroiliitis: Scoring System
Grade 0 : Normal
Grade 1: Suspicious changes
Grade 2: Minimal Change. Localized
erosions or sclerosis not altering joint
width
Grade 3: Definite moderate to severe
change, with one or more of the
following: Erosions; Sclerosis; Joint Space
Widening; Joint Space Narrowing;
Partial ankylosis
Grade 4: Severe. Total Ankylosis
SpA Characteristic XRAY
change
Erosions
Osteitis (Sclerosis)
Bridging Syndesmophytes
Ankylosis of joints
Sacroiliitis grade 3 –4 Sacroiliitis grade 3 –4 bilaterallybilaterally
Sacroiliitis grade II Sacroiliitis grade II bilat.bilat.
SclerosisSclerosisErosionsErosions
Enthesopathy
Periosteal
new bone
formation
Bone
McGonagle D. McGonagle D. Arthritis Rheum.Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1080-1086. 1999;42:1080-1086.
Subchondral
bone
inflammation
and
resorption
Tendon
©ACR©ACR
Inflammatory Rheumatoid arthritis Ankylosing spondylitis Reiter's syndrome Psoriatic arthritis Inflammatory bowel disease Lyme disease Late‑onset Pauciarticular JRA LeprosyMechanical/Degenerative Trauma OsteoarthritisMetabolic/Endocrine DISH Acromegaly Fluorosis Retinoid therapy Hypoparathyroidism Hyperparathyroidism POEMS syndrome X‑linked hypophosphatemia
Severe Complications of AS
Spinal stiffness/ankylosis in kyphotic position
Osteoporosis/spinal fractures
Severe uveitis (25-40%)
Neurologic complications
Other organ involvement
heart
lung
kidney
Mortality
Fractures in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Cumulative prevalence 10-20% in AS Mainly thoracic spine involved Peripheral bony fractures not increased Contributing factors:
Inflammation, low bone density, reduced mobility Reported fracture prevalence in AS patients:
mean age prevalence34 yr: 9.5% vs. 3.4% (Cooper 1994)38 yr: 16.7% vs. 2.6% (Mitra 2000)41 yr: 18% (Ralston 1990)
Relative risk for vertebral fractures 6-8 fold increased
Myocardial Involvement in AS: Diastolic Left Ventricular Function Disturbances
Brewerton, Lancet 1987 73 male AS patients without cardiopulmonary symptoms 16/30 (53%) diastolic function disturbancy (TTE) 28 autopsies: minor increase of interstitial myocardial
connective tissue no inflammation, no amyloidosis
Crowley, Crowley, Am J CardiolAm J Cardiol 1993 1993 59 AS patients, without cardiopulmonary symptoms TTE: 20% diastolic LV dysfunction
; ;
Ankylosing Spondylitis - Mortality 1.5 – 4 fold increased
amyloidosis
spinal fractures
cardiovascular disease
gastrointestinal bleeding
nephritis
pulmonary diseases
colon cancer
violence, alcohol
Myllykangas-Luosujarvi R et al. Myllykangas-Luosujarvi R et al. Br J RheumatolBr J Rheumatol 1998; 37:688 1998; 37:688 (N = 71)(N = 71)Lehtinen K. Lehtinen K. Ann Rheum DisAnn Rheum Dis 1993; 52:174 1993; 52:174 (N = 398)(N = 398)Khan MA et al. Khan MA et al. J RheumatolJ Rheumatol 1981; 8:86 1981; 8:86 (N = 56)(N = 56)Radford EP et al. Radford EP et al. NEJMNEJM 1977; 15:297 1977; 15:297 (N = 836)(N = 836)
Mortality and Causes of Death in
AS Patients Admitted to Hospital 398 patients (47 women, 351 males) with definite AS
Mean age at first admission 36.5 years
After a mean follow up of 25.7 years 152 patients (12 women, 140 males) had died
The expected mortality of the general population of the same sex and age was 103 (9 w, 94 m)
The overall mortality of AS patients: 1.5 times that expected
Risk factors: age, high ESR, peripheral joint involvement
Lehtinen K. Lehtinen K. Ann Rheum DisAnn Rheum Dis 1993 Mar; 52(3):174-6 1993 Mar; 52(3):174-6
Rheumatology: a Pain in the Butt!
17 yr. old Latin girl with a 4 month hx of Left “Hip Pain”.
Pain is L posterior gluteal, nonradiating.
Hurts to walk. Not improved by exercise. No other joint
pain or swelling
C/O fevers + chills, malaise, NO AM Stiffness
Denies sexual activity, IVDA, EtOH, and foreign travel.
She has never been to Mexico, but likes the Chalupas!
Exam: T=38oC, mild hepatomegaly, 3+ tender over the
Left SI joint - No warmth or erythema
WBC = 3.8 (L shift); Hct = 41%; ESR = 87 mm/hr
Left SI “blurred” on XRAY. Bone scan positive @ L SI
Rheumatic Pain in the Butt
Causes of Sacroiliitis (Unilateral)
SpA, Reiters, Psoriatic arthritis, AS, IBD
Septic - Staph Aureus in IVDA
Septic - Pneumococcus, Klebsiella, Proteus,
Pseudomonas, Brucella, mycobacterial, fungal
Increased SI Sclerosis
Hyperparathyroidism
DJD
Osteitis Condensans Ilii - radiographic s of ilieal
sclerosis common during/after pregnancy (No Sxs)
Diagnostic test/procedure?
Brucella Sacroiliits
Source: Goat (B. Mellitensis), Cow (B. Abortus), Hogs (B.
Suis) and Dog (B. canis)
Human infx thru skin or ingestion of animal tissue or milk.
At Risk: Slaughterhouse, Veterinarians, those who ingest
unpasteurized milk or cheese (ie from Mexico)
Features: Constitutional, arthralgias, myalgias,
HepatoSplenomegaly, peripheral arthritits, sacroiliitis, and
spondylitis
Dx: culture or serologic tests
Rx: tetracycline (+ rifampin) > 4 weeks
REACTIVE ARTHRITIS Acute inflammatory arthritis occuring 1-3 weeks after
infectious event (GU, GI, idiopathic)
TRIAD: arthritis + urethritis (vaginitis) + conjunctivitis (classic triad found in < one-third of pts)
Usually asymmetric oligoarticular + extraarticular Sxs Arthritis recurrent in 15-30%, more in chlamydial arthritis pts.
HLA-B27+ in 75-80% Caucasians
Post-venereal onset: more common Sex 5:1 M:F
Post-dysenteric: less, equal M=F
Course: self limiting (< 6 mos), chronic, intermittent
Complications: Acute anterior uveitis 5%, carditis, fasciitis
Decreasing incidence in the HIV era (condom use)
COMMON PATHOGENS
Enteric Infections
Shigella flexneri, serotype 2a, 1b
Salmonella typhimurium, S. enteritidis
Yersinia enterocololitica (serotypes 0:3, 0:8, 0:9;
SCANDINAVIA)
Campylobacter jejuni
Urogenital Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis, C.Pneumoniae
Ureaplasma Urealyticum
Infectious Triggers for Reactive Arthritis
Bacterial: S. paratyphi, S heidelberg, S. abony, S. blocley, S. schwarzengrund, S. haifa, S. manila, S. newport, S. bovismorbificans Y. pseudotuberculosis (outside of Scandinavia) C. fetus Vibrio parahemolyticus C. psittaci Streptococcal (Group A,G G) Clostridium difficile Propionibacterium Corynebacterium Acne Staphylococcus aureus (Toxic shock arthritis)
Spirochetal: Borrelia burgdorferi
Mycobacterium tuberculosis and avium intracellulare (Poncet's disease)
Parasitic: Giardia lamblia, Strongyloides stercoralis , Cryptosporidium, Ascaris lumbricoides, Taenia saginata, Filaria
Immunotherapy/Immunization Related Bacillus Calmette-Guerin : intravesical injection Hepatitis A vaccine
UNCOMMON Infectious Triggers
Chlamydial Arthritis
More than 50% of Reiter’s patients have Abs to Chlamydia
Chlamydial Ags by RNA or DNA probes found in joints
May account for up to 10% of all EARLY Arthritis patients
C. Trachomatis > C. psittaci or C. Pneumoniae (erythema nodosum, pneumonia, myocarditis)
Manifestations similar to Reiters, < 50% B27+; and ~15% have no urogenital sxs.
Dx: Sxs + serology or PCR probe
Rx: doxycycline or lymecycline > 3 mos. to eradicate infx and decrease sequellae
Post-Dysenteric Outbreaks of Reiters Epidemics of known arthritogenic bacteria
< 20% of HLA-B27(+) persons develop incomplete Reiters
Fewer develop Complete Reiters syndrome
Pts w arthritis more likely to be HLA-B27 negative in some
studies
Shigellosis: 0.2-2% of patients develop reactive arthritis
often diarrhea resolves before arthritis appears
Salmonella: 1-3% develop reactive arthritis (6-12% seen?)
Like Shigella, arthritis more likely in HLA-B27 or HLA-B7 (+)
Other cross reactive Ags: Bw22, B40, B42, or B60
HIV and Reactive Arthritis
1st described 1987, after immunosuppression HIV AIDS
B27+ HIV+ patients may manifest a severe form of: Reactive arthritis; Psoriatic arthritis; Spondyloarthropathy
Common: asymmetric poly- or oligoarthritis, lower extremitiy arthritis,
dactylitis, enthesitis, fasciitis, conjunctivitis, urethritis
Anti-Viral Therapy as resulted in these being less common in
the USA and more common in sub-Saharan Africa
DOES NOT OCCUR anklylosing spondylitis OR uveitis
Epidemiologic studies DID NOT show increased incidence of
Reiters in HIV+ populations
Notes on Rx: poor NSAID response; progression of AIDS w/
immunosuppressive Rx
GU involvement• Urethritis• Prostatitis• Orchitis• Balanitis• Vaginitis• Cervicitis
Sausage Digits= periostitis + enthesitis + synovitis. Seen in SpA, JRA, MCTD
GC arthritis vs Reiter’s Syndrome
GC Arthritis Reiter’s
Sex F > M M >>>F
Race B>W>L W>B>L
Duration Days Days-Mos
Sore throat 25% 15%
Eye 1% 60%
Genital lesions <5% 33%
Jt. Distribution Mono/Oligo Oligo/Poly
Tenosynovitis 50% 20%
Syn fluid WBC >40K ~20K
+ C/S <20% 0
Psoriasis 2-3 million in USA
Psoriatic Arthritis400,000
PsA Dx320,000
PsA Rx288,000
PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PsA)
Chronic inflammatory arthropathy in setting of psoriasis
Etiology and genotype unclear
1-5% of US population has Psoriasis: 5-42% of these will
develop psoriatic arthritis (skin usually precedes joints) Frequency of PsA increases with disease severity and duration
Nail changes: pitting, dystrophy, onycholysis
Course: chronic, destructive arthritis in 30-50%
Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis
Type Key Clinical Features Incidence
Asymmetric polyarthritis
or oligoarthritis
Morning stiffness, DIP and PIP
involvement, nail disease, 4 joints
involved
40%
Symmetric polyarthritisSymmetric polyarthritis, RA-like
distribution, but RF negative25%
Ankylosing spondylitisInflammatory low back pain, sacroilitis,
axial involvement, 50% HLA-B27+20%
Distal interphalangeal
joint disease
Nail changes, often bilateral joint
involvement15%
Arthritis mutilans
Destructive form of arthritis,
telescoping digits, joint lysis, typically
in phalanges and metacarpals
<5%
SAPHO Syndrome Synovitis, Acne, Pustolosis, Hyperostosis, Osteitis
(Pustular Skin Disease + Osteitis or Arthritis
Rare form of reactive
Most reports from Japan > Scandinavia > France > USA
Arthritis of Amphiarthroses (Saddle joints): AC, SC, Manubriosternal
Imaging: erosions, osteitis, ~30% sacroiliitis, +Bone Scan
Therapy: Rx of pustular skin dz +/- response to Abx, NSAIDs, Steroids, SSZ, colchicine,
pamidronate Good response to TNF inhibitors
ENTEROPATHIC ARTHRITIS 5-20% of IBD patients (Crohns disease or Ulcerative colitis) will
develop inflammatory arthritis
Risk increases with extent of colonic dz and presence of
other extraintestinal manifestations: abscesses, E. Nodosum,
uveitis, pyoderma gangrenosum
Gut disease may be asymptomatic for years Subsets:
Asymmetric oligoarthritis (intermittent or chronic)
Seronegative RA-like polyarthritis 20% of IBD pts
Spondylitis 10-15% (may be misdiagnosed as AS)
Peripheral arthritis parallels the gut! NOT THE SPINE!
Uveitis: Definitions
Anterior Uveitis defined as the presence of anterior chamber inflammatory flare or cells associated with keratic precipitates and/or iris lesions, such as synechiae
Intermediate uveitis defined as the presence of cells in the vitreous with/without the presence of inflammatory cell condensations (snowballs) in the anterior vitreous or the peripheral retina.
Posterior uveitis was defined as the presence of inflammatory signs involving the retina, choroid, retinal vessels, and/or posterior vitreous humor.
Panuveitis was defined as a combination of inflammation involving the 3 previously described sites.
UVEITIS: CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS
20-40% associated with systemic Dz
Anterior Uveitis:Eye pain, photphobia,
↓vision, unilateral > B/L, acute > chronic,
may be recurrent, No correlation with
articular disease Iritis, iridocyclitis, uveitis
Iriis, Ciliary Body
HLA-B27 SpA (AS, RS)
(less common in B27-)
25-40% of AS pts
JRA, Sarcoid, Behcets
Infx: herpes, Tbc Khan MA. Khan MA. AR.AR.;20: 909, 1977;20: 909, 1977Maksymowych WP. Maksymowych WP. ARD ARD 54:128, 199554:128, 1995
Nonpharmacologic measures Patient education, joint protection, maintenance of function and
posture (Ankylosing Spondylitis Association, Arthritis Foundation)
Exercise, rest, physical therapy, diet, vocational counseling
Pharmacologic therapies Analgesic agents
Use to control noninflammatory symptoms or “burnt out”
spondyloarthropathy
Maybe useful as adjunctive therapy during active inflammatory Dz
NSAIDs - Mainstays for Sx therapy; Does not change course of SpA
Corticosteroids - rarely used; rarely effective (occ intralesional use)
DMARD: SSZ, MTX only effective with peripheral arthritis – not spine
anti-TNF therapies: highly effective with inflammatory spondylitis
SpA: Therapeutic Options
May be useful in the control of: inflammatory back pain,
spinal stiffness, peripheral arthritis, enthesopathy No evidence that NSAIDs inhibit disease progression
FDA-approved NSAIDs for AS: phenylbutazone
Indomethacin, indomethacin-SR, enteric coated
acetylsalicylic acid, naproxen, sulindac, diclofenac.
Few controlled and antecdotal reports suggest that certain
NSAIDs may be more effective:
phenylbutazone: no longer available due to risk of
agranulocytosis
indomethacin: especially in long acting form. CNS Sx?
diclofenac: as effective as Indocin, less toxic? LFTs!
NSAIDs
Systemic corticosteroids are seldom used in the
Spondyloarthropathies.
No evidence to support the use of systemic low dose
OR high (“pulse”) dose therapy
Most useful as local therapy:
ophthalmic preparations: for ocular inflammation
intralesional injections: for enthesitis or tendinitis
intra-articular injection: for uncontrolled monarthritis
intra-articular injection of sacroiliac joint: uncontrolled
trials suggest efficacy
Spondyloarthropathies: Corticosteroids
Consider DMARDs when: Antiinflammatory therapy is insufficient
Progressive inflammatory axial disease
Active persisent polyarthritis
Uncontrolled extra-spinal/articular disease
But Which DMARD? None shown to be effective at Axial disease
None FDA approved for AS, SpA
MTX indicated in psoriasis – not psoriatic arthritis– Hepatotoxicity Issues
Reliance on antecdotes and experience in RA
NSAID Resistant AS/SpA
Gold - no proven benefit! Intramuscular (aurothioglucose, aurothiomalate)
Dosing similar to that used in rheumatoid arthritis
Primarily studied in psoriatic arthritis
Hydroxychloroquine Controlled and uncontrolled trials in psoriatic arthritis, suggesting
some efficacy.
Dermatology literature suggests it may exacerbate Psoriasis?
Dose: 200-400 mg per day
Azathioprine Uncontrolled and controlled trials in Reiters and psoriatic arthritis
Dose: 1-2.5 mg/kg/day
Ineffective DMARDs
Methotrexate
Controlled & uncontrolled trials in psoriatic arthritis and AS
Dose: 7.5 - 20 mg per week
AS: of no proven benefit
Psoriatic Arthritis: effective against skin and joint disease
High incidence of hepatotoxicity
Guidelines require regular LFTs, avoid EtOH, Liver Bx q 1500 mg
Sulfasalazine
Well studied in AS, PsA, Reiters
Effective against peripheral arthritis, NOT with axial disease
May work via Tx of asymptomatic ileitis often present
Dose: 2000-4000 mg qd
DMARDs
Rationale for TNF Therapy in Spondyloarthropathies
SpA Primary Pathology = Enthesitis McGonagle D, etal. Curr Opin Rheum 11:244, 1999
Transgenic mice overexpressing TNF develop enthesitis and arthritis resembling AS w/ axial skeletal kyphosis & ankylosis with inflammatory & fibrotic change @ end plates, entheses Crew MD, et al. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 18:219, 1998
Localization of TNF in Sacroiliac joints Stone M, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2000 [abstract]
Osteoclasts and Synoviocytes in PsA express RANKL- Ritchlin C, et al. ACR 2001
Therapeutic benefit of TNF inhibition in AS & PsA
Study Scheme Etanercept in AS, Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataPhase 3 Data
Screening Randomization284 Patients
Placebo139 Patients
Etanercept138 Patients
24 Wks
330 Patients
Primary ASAS 20 response criteria at 12 wks
Conditional
primary
ASAS 20 response criteria at 24 wks
Secondary ASAS 50, ASAS 70 response criteria at 12 and 24
wks; percent and time to reach ASAS partial
remission; safety data
Other Spinal mobility measures; peripheral joint count;
ESR; CRP
Endpoints Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
ASAS = Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study Group response criteria.ASAS = Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study Group response criteria.
Partial Remission Defined in Protocol Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataData
Value of <20 in each of the following 4 domains:
Patient global assessment by VAS
Pain score by VAS
BASFI
BASDAI (two morning stiffness-related scores)
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria Meet modified NY criteria for AS Have active disease as determined by stiffness,
global, pain scores, functional indexExclusion criteria Total spinal ankylosis Prior treatment with TNF inhibitorAllowances Stable doses of NSAIDs, prednisone 10 mg/day,
SSZ, HCQ, MTX
Placebo
(n=139)
Etanercept
(n=138)
Mean age (yrs) 41.9 42.1
Male (%) 76 76
Caucasian (%) 91 94
Mean disease
duration (yrs)
10.5 10.1
HLA-B27+ (%) 84 84
Demographics Etanercept in AS, Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataPhase 3 Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
ASAS 20 Response at Weeks 12 and 24 Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataData
27272323
6060 5858
00
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
6060
7070
Week 12Week 12 Week 24Week 24
PLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept
% of Patients% of Patients
**PP<0.0001<0.0001
** *
PLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
ASAS 20 Rapid Response Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
WeeksWeeks
00
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
6060
7070
00 44 88 1212 1616 2020 2424
PlaceboPlacebo
EtanerceptEtanercept
* ** * *
% of Patients% of Patients
**PP<0.0001<0.0001
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
ASAS 50 and ASAS 70 Responses Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
00
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
ASAS 50ASAS 50
1212 2424
PlaceboPlacebo
EtanerceptEtanercept* *
* *
**PP<0.0001<0.0001
ASAS 70ASAS 70
1212 2424
% % PatientsPatients
WeekWeek WeekWeek
1313
45454242
101077
2929 2828
55
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
00
55
1010
1515
2020
2525
00 44 88 1212 1616 2020 2424
PlaceboPlacebo
EtanerceptEtanercept
**PP<0.01; **<0.01; **PP<0.001<0.001 WeeksWeeks
% Patients
*
** ***
**
Partial RemissionEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
00
55
1010
1515
2020
2525
3030
PLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept
16.716.7
0000
55
1010
1515
2020
2525
3030
PLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept
9.79.7
0000
55
1010
1515
2020
2525
3030
PLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept
2525
00
Spinal Mobility Measures at 24 WeeksMedian Percent Improvement From Baseline
Occiput-to-WallOcciput-to-WallMeasurementMeasurement
Modified Schober’sModified Schober’sChest ExpansionChest Expansion
**PP values values by van Elteren’s test, which is a non-parametric rank test based on distribution of by van Elteren’s test, which is a non-parametric rank test based on distribution of values and not on mean or medianvalues and not on mean or median. .
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript inManuscript in preparation.preparation.
**
**
**
*P*P<0.0001<0.0001 *P*P<0.0001<0.0001*P*P=0.0014=0.0014
Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
Acute Phase ReactantsChange From Baseline
00 00
-5.4
0
60 6069 73
-20-20
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
PlaceboPlacebo
EtanerceptEtanercept** **
** **
**PP<0.0001<0.0001
Mean % ImprovementMean % Improvement
Week 12Week 12
ESR CRP
Week 24Week 24 Week 12Week 12 Week 24Week 24
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript inManuscript in preparation.preparation.
Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
Adverse Events With Frequency 5%Etanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
Placebo (%)
(n=139)
Etanercept (%)
(n=138)
ISR 9 30
Hematoma/bruising injection
site
17 21
URI 12 20
Headache 12 14
Accidental injury 4 12
Diarrhea 9 8
Rash 7 8
Rhinitis 7 6
Nausea 5 5
Abdominal pain 5 5Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
Placebo (n=5) Etanercept (n=9)
2 injury accidents 3 fractures
1 viral infection 1 fever/rash
1 chest pain 1 cellulitis
1 suicide attempt 1 ulcerative colitis
1 lymphadenopathy
1 wound infection (cat
bite)
1 intestinal obstruction
Serious Adverse EventsEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 DataEtanercept in AS, Phase 3 Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Manuscript in preparationManuscript in preparation..
Infliximab in AS Study design:Study design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-Randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled, national multicenter studycontrolled, national multicenter studywith open follow-up phase with open follow-up phase
Number of patients:Number of patients: N=70N=70
Duration of treatment:Duration of treatment: 1 year1 year
Study protocol:Study protocol: 3 months: 35 patients placebo/ 3 months: 35 patients placebo/ 35 patients infliximab35 patients infliximab
9 months: 66 patients open infliximab9 months: 66 patients open infliximab
Medication:Medication: 5 mg/kg infliximab 5 mg/kg infliximab
at week 0, 2, 6 at week 0, 2, 6 every 6 weeks every 6 weeks
Braun J, et al. Braun J, et al. Lancet.Lancet. 2002; 2002;359:1187-1193359:1187-1193..Brandt J, et al. Brandt J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(suppl 1). Abstract SAT0138. 2002;61(suppl 1). Abstract SAT0138.
0
20
40
60
80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Weeks
Pati
ents
Resp
on
din
g (
%)
Placebo
Infliximab
Braun J, et al. Braun J, et al. Lancet.Lancet. 2002; 2002;359:1187-1193359:1187-1193..
** *
*P<0.01
Infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks
Infliximab in AS BASDAI 20
Infliximab in AS
Patients With BASDAI 50 Over 48 Weeks
Braun J, et al. Braun J, et al. Lancet.Lancet. 2002; 2002;359:1187-1193359:1187-1193..Brandt J, et al. Brandt J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(suppl 1). Abstract SAT0138. 2002;61(suppl 1). Abstract SAT0138.
Weeks
Infliximab 5 mg/kg (0, 2, 6 weeks and every 6 weeks)Placebo/Infliximab (5 mg/kg) at week 12
0
20
40
60
80
0 2 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Pat
ien
ts R
esp
on
din
g %
Open-label phase
Double-blind phase
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Weeks
Pat
ien
ts i
n P
arti
al R
emis
sio
n
(%)
Placebo
Infliximab*
*P =0.005
Infliximab in AS
Patients With Partial Remission
Braun J, et al. Braun J, et al. Lancet.Lancet. 2002; 2002;359:1187-1193359:1187-1193..
Infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks
Study ParametersStudy design • 6 mo duration
• Multicentered •
Randomized •
Double-blind, PLB-controlled
Dosage • Etanercept 25 mg, 2x/wk or PLB
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Allowances
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Active psoriatic arthritis with 3 swollen and tender joints
Psoriasis
Prednisone 10 mg/day MTX 25 mg/week
Mease PJ, et al. Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Rheum.Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(suppl):S90. Abstract 226. 2001;44(suppl):S90. Abstract 226.
Significant concurrent medical disease
Study ParametersEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataRadiographic Data
Demographics • PLB n=104, etanercept n=101 • M
> F •
Mean duration disease 6.4–7.1 yrs
• Mean prior DMARDs 1.6–1.7
Primary
Endpoints
• ACR20 at 3 mo
Secondary
Endpoints
ACR20 at 24 weeks ACR50 and 70 at 12 and 24 weeks Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at 12
and 24 weeks Percent improvement in individual parameter of
disease activity at 12 and 24 weeks
24 Weeks24 Weeks Placebo Placebo Etanercept Etanercept
n=104n=104 n=101n=101
12 Weeks*12 Weeks* Placebo Placebo Etanercept Etanercept
n=104n=104 n=101n=101
Patient Status
Completed (%) 95 99 6992
Discontinued (%)Lack of efficacy 2 0 225Other 3 1 93
*Primary endpoint*Primary endpoint
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
ACR Response at 12 Weeks
**PP0.0010.001ACR 20ACR 20 ACR 50ACR 50 ACR 70ACR 70
44 00
38 *38 *
11 *11 *15
59 *
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
% % PatientsPatients
PlaceboPlaceboEtanerceptEtanerceptPrimary
Endpoint
100100Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
ACR Response at 24 Weeks
ACR20 ACR20 ACR50ACR50 ACR70ACR70
11441313
50 50 **
37 37 **
9 9 ****
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
% % PatientsPatients
**PP0.0010.001****PP0.0090.009
100100Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
PlaceboPlaceboEtanerceptEtanercept
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
ACR 20 Response at 12 Weeks by MTX Use
EtanerceptEtanerceptPLBPLB EtanerceptEtanercept PLBPLB
With MTXWith MTX
1919
6262**
1313
5858**
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
Without MTXWithout MTX
**PP0.0010.001
100100
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
% % PatientsPatients
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Improvement in PASI Score at 6 Months
Median percent improvement in PASI
score 0 47 <0.0001
Percent of patients who improved PASI by:
50% 18 47 <0.0005
75% 3 23 0.0013
PlaceboPlacebon=62n=62
EtanerceptEtanerceptn=66n=66ParameterParameter
PP value value
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Psoriatic Arthritis: Improved Skin Lesions
12 Weeks12 WeeksBaselineBaseline
Elbow of patient 577; 50% improvement in target lesion.Elbow of patient 577; 50% improvement in target lesion.
Etanercept Phase III Adverse Events in 5% of Patients
PlaceboPlacebo EnbrelEnbreln=104n=104 n=101n=101
Event Event (%)(%) (%)(%)
Any non-infectious eventAny non-infectious event 6666 6464Any infectious eventAny infectious event 4343 4040
Injection site reactionInjection site reaction 99 36*36*Upper respiratory infectionUpper respiratory infection 2323 2121Injection site ecchymosisInjection site ecchymosis 1111 1212Accidental injuryAccidental injury 55 88HeadacheHeadache 55 88SinusitisSinusitis 88 66Urinary tract infectionUrinary tract infection 66 66RashRash 77 55
**PP<.001<.001
Study DesignR
and
om
ized
Ran
do
miz
ed
X-rayX-ray
6
Etanercept (n=101)
X-rayX-ray
Double-Blind TrialDouble-Blind Trial Open-Label ExtensionOpen-Label Extension
12
Etanercept
0
X-rayX-ray
MonthsMonths
Placebo (n=104)* Etanercept
*81 of the placebo patients entered the open-label extension prior to obtaining the 12-
month x-ray, with a mean 28-day exposure to etanercept
Ory P, et al. Ory P, et al. Arthritis RheumArthritis Rheum. 2002;46(suppl 9):S196. Oral presentation 442. 2002;46(suppl 9):S196. Oral presentation 442..
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Baseline Radiographic Features Were Different
PlaceboPlacebo(n=104)(n=104)
EtanerceptEtanercept(n=101)(n=101) P P value*value*
Total Sharp scoreTotal Sharp score 18.3 (7.5)18.3 (7.5) 25.9 (11.5)25.9 (11.5) 0.060.06
Erosion scoreErosion score 8.6 (3.3)8.6 (3.3) 12.9 (5.5)12.9 (5.5) 0.020.02
Joint space Joint space narrowing scorenarrowing score
9.7 (4.3)9.7 (4.3) 13.0 (6.0)13.0 (6.0) 0.150.15
*Wilcoxon Rank Sum*Wilcoxon Rank Sum
Mean (median)Mean (median)
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Ory P, et al. Ory P, et al. Arthritis RheumArthritis Rheum. 2002;46(suppl 9):S196. Oral presentation 442. 2002;46(suppl 9):S196. Oral presentation 442..
Placebo (n=104)Placebo (n=104)
Etanercept (n=101)Etanercept (n=101)
Annualized Rates of Progression DifferedAnnualized Rates of Progression Differed
-0.2-0.2
00
0.20.2
0.40.4
0.60.6
0.80.8
11
1.21.2
PP=0.0006=0.0006
PP=0.0002=0.0002
PP=0.2033=0.2033
PP=0.0001=0.0001
PP<0.0001<0.0001
PP=0.438=0.438
TSSTSS EROERO JSNJSN TSSTSS EROERO JSNJSN
6 months6 months 12 months12 months
Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic DataEtanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis, Phase 3 Study, Radiographic Data
Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Data on file, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
References Dougados M, van der Linden SM, Juhlin R, et al: The European Spondyloarthropathy
Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218-1227, 1991
Amor B, Dougados M, Mijiyama M, et al: Criteres de classification des spondyloarthropathies. Rev Rhum 57:85-89, 1990
Amor B, Dougados M, Khan MA. Management of refractory ankylosing spondylitis and related spondyloarthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin N Amer 21: 117-128, 1995
Wasner C, Britton MC, Kraines G, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 246:2168-2172, 1981
Cush JJ, Lipsky PE. Reiter’s syndrome and reactive arthritis. In, Arthritis and Allied Conditions - A Textbook of Rheumatology. W.J. Koopman (ed)., 13th edition, Philadelphia, Williams & Wilkins, 1996, pp 1209-1227
Cush JJ, Lipsky PE. The Spondyloarthropathies. In, Cecil Textbook of Internal Medicine. J.C. Bennett, et al (eds). 20th ed., W.B. Saunders, 1996
Taurog JD, Richardson JA, Croft JT. The germfree state prevents development of gut and joint inflammatory disease in HLA-B27 transgenic rats. J Exp Med 1994 Dec 1;180(6):2359-64
Bodaghi B, et al. Chronic Severe Uveitis: Etiology and Visual Outcome in 927 Patients from a Single Center. Medicine 80 (4): 263-70, 2001
Granfors K, et al. The cutting edge of spondylarthropathy research in the millennium. Arthritis Rheum 46(3):606-13, 2002
Gorman JD, Sack KE, Davis JC. Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of
TNF. New Engl J Med 346:1349-56, 2002
Mease P, Goffe BS, Metz J, VanderStoep A, Finck B. Etanercept in the treatment
of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 356:385-90, 2000
Van den Bosch F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, et al. Randomized double-blind
comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor (infliximab)
versus placebo in active spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 46: 755-65, 2002
Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with
infliximab: a randomized controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 359:1187-93, 2002
Wagner AD. Andresen J. Jendro MC. Hulsemann JL. Zeidler H. Sustained
response to tumor necrosis factor alpha-blocking agents in two patients with SAPHO
syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 46(7):1965-8, 2002
Winchester R. Psoriatic arthritis and the spectrum of syndroms related to the
SAPHO syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol 11:251-56, 1999
Khan MA. Update on spondyloarthropathies. Ann Int Med 136 (12): 896-907,
2002
Van der Linden SJ, van der Heijde D. Ankylosing spondyltis. Rheum Dis Clin North
Amer 24: 663-915, 1998