on lessing's "big ugly ditch"
TRANSCRIPT
8/14/2019 On Lessing's "Big Ugly Ditch"
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-lessings-big-ugly-ditch 1/3
James Harris #166
According to Gotthold Lessing, irrefutable and observable miracles would generate faith
in him. However, he avers that no substantiated miracles happen in his day. We have reports of
fulfilled prophecy, not observed fulfilled prophecy. These reports only offer as much reliability
as historiography can yield. In other words, history capitulates to the observable, or science. All
these propositions lead Lessing to the conclusion that if something cannot be demonstrated,
likewise, nothing can use this indemonstrable entity as a proof or legitimacy for something else.
He views this as an impassable chasm between the substantiation and content of the faith. Now
as his argument climaxes in that famous line here paraphrased, he applies a sort of proto-
pragmatism to teachings that Jesus had formerly legitimated by miracles. Lessing argues for
Jesus’ teachings holding axiomatic status, in no need of fanciful demonstrations. Much of
Christianity during and after the Protestant Reformation seems to have embodied this line of
reasoning. Are miracles real, much less necessary? While some of these propositions could seem
self-evident, others seem less than probable, thus opening the door to questioning some of the
other propositions. Eventually one may come to the conclusion that one may cross Lessing’s
ditch.
When Lessing opens his argument in the selection, he explains that seeing the miracles of
Jesus and observing him fulfill ancient prophecies in his presence would have immediately
captured his allegiance. While many contemporary to Lessing could have accepted this, and even
today, one needs only a cursory recounting of Israel’s history to realize the naiveté of such a
thought. Did not the Ancient Israelites witness YHVH’s power wrought in delivering them from
Egypt, only to complain bitterly and doubt continually throughout their desert sojourn? Even
when YHVH provided food, water, enduring clothing, deliverance from enemies, observable
guidance through the wilderness—and all of this miraculously—doubters abounded. The
1
8/14/2019 On Lessing's "Big Ugly Ditch"
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-lessings-big-ugly-ditch 2/3
James Harris #166
miracles did not deterministically alter the peoples’ views. We glean only that some believed and
some did not, and that the miracles then implemented neither generated nor cancelled faith on the
observer.
One of Lessing’s strongest points lies in his presentation of miracles not happening
contemporarily. Though they do not happen, Christian teaching remains true in his reasoning.
Many since his time have held this. But let us turn to his distinction between fulfilled prophecy
and reports of the same and afterward return to the apparent lack of miracles. Reports indeed
witness to fulfilled prophecy and warrant contrast from the event itself. And yet, we only know
the original prophecies by means of record. How does the historian know that the recorded
prophecies portray the actual prophecies uttered? According to Lessing’s reasoning, the
historical Jesus could not fulfill prophecy, as he would have had to live contemporary with the
prophets. Records of fulfilled prophecies are twice removed from reality as recorded prophecies
are removed once from the prophet’s lips. If one maintains that records lose the force of the
event recorded this extremely, then Lessing’s reasoning might prove something. Let us follow
him, though, that miracles grab the attention of observers to hear what the miracle worker
message. Miracles functioned many times in Jesus’ ministry and in that of the early church as
evidence that the gospel had made headway. However, once God establishes by a miracle that he
is rather powerful, does this preclude him from acting similarly later? What happens if a truth
once established by a miracle falls into obscurity? It would seem in Lessing’s schema that that
people might need another demonstration of God’s power.
“If no historical truth can be demonstrated, then nothing can be demonstrated by means
of historical truths” (Lessing quoted from Placher’s Readings). Many orators and journalists
employ such equative formulae to seal an argument. While this rings nicely in the ear, it also
2
8/14/2019 On Lessing's "Big Ugly Ditch"
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-lessings-big-ugly-ditch 3/3
James Harris #166
defies reality and its logic. His dictum works as a mathematical equation, something incongruent
with the unpredictability of life. In addition to reason and superstitions, people live out dynamic
existences, ebbing between pleasures, power, family, community, politics, religious orientation,
and any number of variables. While technically, one might not demonstrate principles from
history, one most certainly may establish precedent. However, even if we grant that, we have not
even touched on the mathematical inequality of historical demonstration and rational derivation.
Let us also consider Lessing’s place in history. Were he alive today, he might follow the
accidental trend of the previously described anthropology. He might consider those of the
Enlightenment an ever shrinking minority or historical hiccup. Do we not employ principles
gleaned from historical figures and events?
Lessing crossed his own ditch in a way by providing a pragmatic solution within his
worldview. People that do not share his deterministic worldview easily jump his chasm daily by
means of pragmatism. However, it does seem that one may cross this bridge with a different
worldview from him and without deferring to pragmatism. Miracles did not occur only in Jesus’
day but before him in Israel’s history and after him in the Church. This indicates that they did not
occur as accidents in history. They occurred on multiple occasions and in various places. Not
being able to speak for much history, recently Pentecostal missionaries have witnessed
substantiated miracles in recently developed missions that have given impetus to the gospel’s
spread. Only if one maintains a secular outlook of societies does one necessarily have to accept
the determinism that Lessing recorded in his truism. One must recognize worldviews as
worldviews, and not as irrefutable descriptions of reality.
3