on line speech harms- melbourne

33
On-Line Speech Harms Using Legal Process Judge David Harvey @djhdcj Blog:www.theitcountreyjustice.wordpress.com

Upload: david-harvey

Post on 15-Dec-2014

81 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

This is a presentation accompanying a paper delivered to the Bullying, Young People and the Law Symposium in Melbourne 18 - 19 July 2013.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On line speech harms- melbourne

On-Line Speech HarmsUsing Legal Process

Judge David Harvey

@djhdcj

Blog:www.theitcountreyjustice.wordpress.com

Page 2: On line speech harms- melbourne

• The environment – paradigmatic change

• Dealing with on-line speech harms – strategy

• Dealing with on-line speech harms - practice

Page 3: On line speech harms- melbourne

Mark Prensky

Page 4: On line speech harms- melbourne

Digital Immigrants

Page 5: On line speech harms- melbourne

Digital Natives

Page 6: On line speech harms- melbourne
Page 7: On line speech harms- melbourne

It’s all about how we process information

Page 8: On line speech harms- melbourne
Page 9: On line speech harms- melbourne

Digital Technologies give meaning to McLuhan’s comment:

Page 10: On line speech harms- melbourne

The medium is the message

Page 11: On line speech harms- melbourne

The impact of the digital communications technologies – a convergence of everything that has gone before - lies in the way in which it redefines the use of information and the way we access it, process it, use it, respond to it and our expectations of it and its availability.

Page 12: On line speech harms- melbourne

The Properties of Digital Technologies

• Persistence• Continuing disruptive

change• Dynamic information• Delinearisation of

information• Dissociative

enablement

• Permissionless innovation

• Availability• Participation• Searchability• Retrievability

Page 13: On line speech harms- melbourne

The information expectations of Digital Natives have been shaped and moulded by these qualities.

Page 14: On line speech harms- melbourne

Their uses and expectations of what happens in the on-line world are quite different to those of their parents (digital immigrants) or those of my generation (digital aliens).

Page 15: On line speech harms- melbourne

Thus any solution must be premised upon an understanding of the technology and the way that it shapes behaviours and values underlying those behaviours

Page 16: On line speech harms- melbourne

The solution must also recognise another McLuhan aphorism

Page 17: On line speech harms- melbourne
Page 18: On line speech harms- melbourne

Any Solution Must Recognise

Page 19: On line speech harms- melbourne

The time factor – in “internet time” information moves faster than it does in the real world

Page 20: On line speech harms- melbourne

Information is dynamic and spreads “virally”

Page 21: On line speech harms- melbourne

“Dissociative enablement” means that people are going to behave differently when operating from the apparent anonymity of a private room or space and from behind a computer screen

Page 22: On line speech harms- melbourne

Any remedy is going to be partial – given that information on the internet is going to remain in some shape or form (the quality of persistence or “the document that does not die”)

Page 23: On line speech harms- melbourne

Normal civil and political rights including a robust recognition of freedom of speech and expression and that the internet is neutral. Restrictions on a free and open internet must be minimal.

Page 24: On line speech harms- melbourne

Dual Approach

The OffenceThe Communications Tribunal

Page 25: On line speech harms- melbourne

The Offence

Causing harm by means of a communciations device(a) grossly offensive; or (b) of an indecent, obscene, or menacing character; or (c) knowingly false.

Intention aspects.

Victim must have seen the communication – gossip is not enough

Relevant factors to be taken into account

Page 26: On line speech harms- melbourne

The Communications Tribunal

Addresses some of the Internet-specific issues

a) it has a limited jurisdictionb) it has limited and specific remediesc) it deals with content and not criminalityd) it operates “on the papers”e) it is a remedy of last resort after a filtering process has been carried out by the Approved Agency

Page 27: On line speech harms- melbourne

• In exercising its functions, the tribunal must have regard to the importance of freedom of expression.

• Transparency is ensured in that the Tribunal must publish its decisions and the reasons for them.

• Communications principles

Page 28: On line speech harms- melbourne

Matters to be Taken into Account

(a) the content of the communication, its offensive nature, and the level of harm caused by it:(b) the purpose of the communicator in communicating it:(c) the occasion, context, and subject-matter of the communication:(d) the extent to which the communication has spread beyond the original communicator and recipient:(e) the age and vulnerability of the complainant:(f) the truth or falsity of the statement:(g) the extent to which the communication is of public interest:(h) the conduct of the defendant, including any attempt by the defendant to minimise the harm caused:(i) the conduct of the complainant, including the extent to which that conduct has contributed to the harm suffered.

Page 29: On line speech harms- melbourne

Orders

(a) A take down order:(b) A future non-publication order(c) Prohibition against encourage others to behave similarly(d) a declaration that a communication breaches a communication principle:(e) correcting a factually incorrect statement(f) right of reply:(g) an apology:(h) author identification.

Page 30: On line speech harms- melbourne

These orders are a significant intrusion upon freedom of expression

Page 31: On line speech harms- melbourne

State of the Play

• The report has been received by the Minister.• She has indicated that the recommendation for a

Communications Tribunal will not be adopted.• The proposed jurisdiction of the Communications

Tribunal will be assumed by the District Court

• Matters to be Considered:– a) lack of specialist expertise in the field of digital

communications law– b) potential procedural delays– c) variation or possible lack of consistency in the

application of principles and the types of orders that may be made

Page 32: On line speech harms- melbourne

The Big Picture

Because politics amounts to an intergenerational contract between one generation and the next, politicians should feel entrusted with the conservation of the past for future generations.Edmund Burke

Page 33: On line speech harms- melbourne

But should digital immigrants tell digital natives how to live their lives in the digital environment?