on the microhardness and young’s modulus...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH
A.D.Zervaki1, G.N. Haidemenopoulos1 and A. Giannakopoulos2
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
![Page 2: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AIM OF THE WORK
•Determination of material hardness (H), and elastic properties such as Young’s modulus (E).
• Acquire knowledge of the physical properties of teeth and tissues : Important aid for understanding their mechanical behavior under clinical loading conditions
•Knoop indentation test enables the E value of human teeth to be obtained in a simple fashion and has potential to be used as a quality control tool in the development of dental implants or prosthetic teeth.
•Biomimetic aspects in mechanical engineering: design better coatings
![Page 3: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OUTLINE
•Introduction – Teeth structure
•Theoretical Background – Determination of E from H
•Experimental Procedure – Sectioning teeth and measuring hardness
•Results & Discussion – Correlation between hardness and modulus
•Conclusions
![Page 4: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Enamel
Dentine
Human Tooth, Structure
Enamel:
The hardest and most highly mineralizedsubstance of the body. It consists of 96 % ofhydroxyapatite, with water and organicmaterial composing the rest.
Dentine:
Hydrated composite of mineralized collagenfibers and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite,with ~ 45% hydroxyapatite, 35 % collagen,20% water (by volume). Dentine consists ofmicroscopic channels (dentinal tubules) whichradiate outward through the dentine andcontain fluid and cellular structures.
![Page 5: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Material Properties including hardness (H), Young’s modulus (E)and fracture toughness can be calculated from measurements taken from Knoop & Vickers indentations.
Recovery of Knoop indentation
Elastic recovery of Knoop indentation (elastic-plastic indentation). Geometry of Knoop indenter is also given at the upper part of the figure.
![Page 6: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methods of obtaining E
Marshall’s methodbased on the measurement ofelastic recovery of the in-surfacedimensions of Knoop indentations
EH
ab
ab 1α−=′′
Conway’s methodrelates Η/Ε to the residual length of a
minor diagonal (b) of Knoop indentations
( )[ ]
−−=
′
EH
bb γν tan121 2
2
ab ratio of the diagonal dimensions a and b in
the fully loaded state = 0.140646
ab′′ ratio of the altered dimensions after
unloading
1a proportionality constant
v Poisson’s ratio
γ average half angle of a Knoop indenter 75o
Marshall et al, Comm. American Cer. Soc. 65(10), (1982), p. 175-176 Conway, J. Mat. Sci., 21 (1986) p.2525-2527
![Page 7: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Experimental Procedure
Specimen Preparation•Dental extraction•Longitudinal sectioning using a low speed diamond wheel•Mounting in an epoxy resin•Grinding with SiC papers 120, 320, 500, 800 and 1000 grit•Polishing with diamond paste of 3 and 1 μm diameter
Specimen Examination, Microhardnes MeasurementsOptical Metallography Microhardness testing (Vickers and Knoop indenters)Instrument reliability was verified by using calibrated test blocks
![Page 8: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
H: Knoop hardness numberF: Force in Nt (0.98)α: length of the longer diagonal in μm.
3
2
1450 10FHa⋅ ⋅
=
′′
−=
αα
αbb
HE 1
Values of Knoop hardness for enamel and dentine were calculated as follows
Values of Young’s modulus (E) for enamel and dentine at different indentation distances were calculated by rearranging Marshal’s equation in terms of E:
where: ab ratio of the diagonal dimensions a and b in
the fully loaded state = 0.140646
ab′′ ratio of the altered dimensions after
unloading
1a constant
1.5 Marshall’s theoretical calculation using elliptical indenter
0.45 Marshall’s experimentally derived value
0.34 Meredith’s proposed value
Hardness and Modulus
![Page 9: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Results
Macroscopic appearance of a human tooth subjected to the specimenpreparation described previously
dentine
enamel
![Page 10: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
43 HV 0,1
301 HV 0,1
307 HV 0,1
Tooth surface
enamel
dentine Amelodentinal junction
Results
Typical Vickers Microhardness measurements in enamel and dentine
![Page 11: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Typical Knoop Indentations
Load: 100gr
enamel
dentine
Residual Surface impressions after Knoop microhardness measurements
in enamel and dentine
![Page 12: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results & Discussion
enamel
dentine
Microhardness profile. Measurements were taken at distances of 150 μm.
![Page 13: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
100
150
200
250
300
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Distance from enamel surface, μm
Kno
op h
ardn
es, H
K
Microhardness - Enamel
Knoop microhardness in enamel with distance from the tooth surface
Enamel
![Page 14: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Distance from amelodentinal junction, μm
Kno
op h
ardn
ess,
HK
Knoop microhardness in dentine with distance from the amelodentinal junction
Dentine
Microhardness - Dentine
![Page 15: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Young’s modulus - Enamel
Calculated Values for Young’s Modulus of Enamel with distance from tooth surface
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160Yo
ung'
s mod
ulus
, GNm
-2
Distance from tooth surface, μm
α1=0.34 α1=0.45 α1=1.5
Enamel
![Page 16: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Calculated Values for Young’s Modulus of Dentine with distance from amelodentinal junction
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
5
10
15
20
25
30
35Yo
ung'
s mod
ulus
, GNm
-2
Distance from amelodentinal junction, μm
α1=0.34 α1=0.45 α1=1.5
Young’s modulus - Dentine
Dentine
![Page 17: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Youn
g's m
odul
us, E
(GNm
-2)
Kno
op h
ardn
ess ,
HK
Distance from enamel surface, μm
H-E correlation in Enamel
Enamel
![Page 18: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
H-E correlation Dentine
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 180030
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Youn
g's m
odul
us, E
(GNm
-2)
Kno
op h
ardn
ess ,
HK
Distance from amelodentinal junction, μm
Dentine
![Page 19: ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS …materials.mie.uth.gr/attachments/article/64/Emodulusofhumanteeth.pdf · ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND YOUNG’S MODULUS OF HUMAN TEETH A.D.Zervaki](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/5a74130e7f8b9aa3688b8ded/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusions
•Knoop, as well as, Vickers microhardness were determined for enamel anddentine and are in good agreement with other results reported in the literature.
•Microhardness of both enamel and dentine varied with depth
•Young’s modulus was determined by utilizing the method described byMarsall et all. Our values are in good agreement with those of otherresearchers.
•The variation of E with distance from the tooth surface and from theamelodentinal junction correlates with the variation of microhardness.