on webwork - xavier university · 2016-11-03 · an exception was arthur sullivant hoffman, who...

87
On Webwork Harry Stephen Keeler

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

On Webwork

Harry Stephen Keeler

Page 2: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

On Webwork

Harry Stephen Keeler

With Contributions By

Willard E. Hawkins, Arthur S. Hoffman, Jack Woodford, Oscar J. Friend,

and Warren Hastings Miller

The Harry Stephen Keeler Society Cincinnati

1997

Page 3: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

On Webwork

Introduction, by Richard Polt......................................................................................... 1

Web-Work Plot Structure, by Willard E. Hawkins with Harry Stephen Keeler (The Student-Writer, June-August, 1917).......................................................................... 4

Original announcement for Web-Work Plot Structure (May 1917) ...........................22

Readers’ comments on Web-Work Plot Structure (September 1917) ........................23

From Fundamentals of Fiction Writing, by Arthur Sullivant Hoffman (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1922).................................................................................................24

Title page and dedication for The Mechanics (And Kinematics) of Web-Work Plot Construction (Chicago: Analytic Press, 1955)........................................................28

Cover of The Author and Journalist, April 1928 ...........................................................30

The Mechanics (And Kinematics) of Web-Work Plot Construction, by Harry Stephen Keeler (The Author and Journalist, April-November, 1928) .................................31

Editorials from The Author and Journalist, March 1928, April 1928, and November 1928.............................................................................................................................71

“Making the Subconscious Say ‘Uncle’,” by Jack Woodford (June 1928)..............74

Editorial comments on Jack Woodford (June 1928 and July 1929) .........................77

“How About a Compromise?”, by Oscar J. Friend (September 1928) ...................78

“Web-Work—When Stuck,” by Warren Hastings Miller (December 1928)..........80

Caricature of Harry Stephen Keeler and Willard E. Hawkins, by Perelman (10 Story Book, November, 1928) ............................................................................84

Page 4: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

1

Introduction

HARRY STEPHEN KEELER (1890-1967) is one of America’s most original novelists. In a half-century of writing he produced nearly a hundred tales, altogether idiosyncratic in their style, structure, and themes. Most of them can be called mysteries, but they violate every conventional rule of detective fiction. They really belong to a genre unto itself, which is best named by a term Keeler invented: webwork. In a webwork plot, a large cast of characters is entangled in a scheme of vast complexity, linked together by coincidences and secret identities. The surprise ending of the story allows the reader to weave the threads together into a pattern. A Keeler plot is the literary equivalent of a Rube Goldberg invention: intricately constructed, absolutely logical, yet absurd. There is an explanation for everything—but the explanations are often so strange that the overall effect is one of extreme artificiality and implausibility. Keeler’s goal was not to imitate reality, but to play with the infinite ways in which we interpret and reinterpret sequences of events. Our earliest glimpse of Keeler’s techniques comes from Web-Work Plot Structure, published in The Student-Writer of Denver in 1917. When The Student-Writer was founded, in 1916, it was little more than a pamphlet advertising Willard E. Hawkins’ “workshop,” which provided writing courses, editing, and typing services. But the little magazine soon grew into a lively forum where successful writers exchanged thoughts and news. Beginning in December, 1921, the publication adopted the more august name The Author and Journalist. (Aside from The Author and Journalist, Hawkins’ greatest success was to be Castaways of Plenty: A Parable of Our Times [1934], a denunciation of technocratic capitalism.) Web-Work Plot Structure attracted great interest, and no doubt helped to make the young magazine a success. The series was written by Hawkins, with extensive interpolations by Keeler. Presumably the entire series is some sort of collaboration, but it is impossible to know how much Keeler contributed beyond the passages which are quoted directly from him. After some preliminary remarks on simple plots, the series presents a diagram and analysis of Keeler’s serial The Crilly Court Mystery. (This serial was eventually published in hardcover, with revisions and additions, in 1933; the book was known as The Crilly Court Mystery in Britain and The Face of the Man from Saturn in the U.S.) This diagram is used as a constant point of reference in the intriguing analyses which follow, including the “Keeler law” (p. 12)—a recipe for beginning to weave a webwork plot. The diagram has been printed on page 10, which

Page 5: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

2

folds out for readers’ convenience (it was originally printed on two facing pages of The Student-Writer). I have attempted to restore the central part of the diagram, which is invisible on the microfilm from which the diagram is reproduced. The words in this central section are my educated guesses. Most readers seem to have been fascinated by the series on webwork. An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant passage from Hoffman’s book is included here on pages 24-27. Keeler’s rebuke to Hoffman can be found on page 60. I thank Eric Thorsen for providing the pages from Hoffman. Web-Work Plot Structure served as the model for Keeler’s most exten-sive treatise on plot theory: The Mechanics (And Kinematics) of Web-Work Plot Construction, serialized in The Author and Journalistin 1928. The “mechanics” aspect of this series deals with the forces that keep a plot moving. These include “motiving” (the traits that dispose a character to act in a certain way) and “motivating” (the circumstances that actually provoke a character to act). The “kinematics” concerns the many ways in which plot strands can affect and “deviate” each other once they have been set in motion by “mechanics.” Here, Keeler distinguishes fifteen “elemental plot combinations,” diagramming and illustrating each one. Mechanics devotes much more attention to the building blocks of plot than the 1917 series did. It may well be that this painstaking analysis made Keeler’s readers lose their patience, for this series was not as well received as the first. Along the lines of the earlier analysis of The Crilly Court Mystery, Keeler diagrams his novel The Voice of the Seven Sparrows. This diagram has been printed on page 62, which folds out. I have restored the central part of the diagram, which is obscured by the binding in the available original copies of Mechanics. Keeler’s series concludes with an important discussion of his actual process of plot composition. Unfortunately, we are told that it has been “very much condensed for serial publication.” Keeler evidently received a number of complimentary copies of these issues of The Author and Journalist, for in 1955, he had the original magazine sheets rebound into a limited-edition book, complete with a new title page and a dedication page. Some copies were sold to collectors; Keeler donated others to his alma mater, the Illinois Institute of Technology (formerly the Armour Institute of Technology), and to the Crerar science library at the University of Chicago, where he did much research for his novels. The three editorials on Mechanics (by Willard E. Hawkins) document the generally hostile reception that readers gave Keeler’s articles. Throughout the series, readers were invited to write in with questions, which Keeler would answer at the end. This question-and-answer session never appeared. Perhaps no questions were fit to print. However, three other authors published articles related to Keeler’s theory during 1928.

Page 6: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant

3

In 1928, Jack Woodford (pseudonym of Josiah Pitts Woolfolk, 1894-1971) was a prolific short-story writer and a frequent contributor to 10 Story Book—a “magazine for iconoclasts” featuring short fiction, humor, and spicy photos of girls, which was edited by Keeler from 1919 to 1940. Woodford’s “Making the Subconscious Say ‘Uncle’ ” presents a theory of writing that is—or seems to be—diametrically opposed to Keeler’s. Woodford went on to pen a popular series of sophisticated erotic novels with titles such as Tainted, Illicit, Unmoral, and Frenzy. He also published several books on the writer’s art, including Why Write A Novel and Plotting for Every Kind of Writing. His autobiography appeared in 1962. In “How About a Compromise?” Oscar J. Friend (1897-1963) tries to find a middle ground between Woodford and Keeler. Friend wrote Western fiction and (under the pen name Owen Fox Jerome) detective novels. In his later years he turned to science fiction, writing such titles as The Kid from Mars and Star Men. Warren Hastings Miller (1876-1960) was a regular contributor to The Author and Journalist, a former editor of Field and Stream, and the author of several books of fiction and nonfiction about adventure in the great outdoors. In “Web-Work—When Stuck,” Miller shows that Keeler’s plot diagramming system can be put to use in emergencies. Whether we find Keeler’s theories useful or misguided, there is no doubt that they make us think about what we look for in literature and how to go about writing. And quite aside from the intellectual stimulation they might provide to literary theorists, Keeler’s reflections on writing are thoroughly entertaining. Keeler writes throughout with the idiosyncratic sensibility and offbeat humor that make his voice one of the most distinctive in American fiction.

Richard Polt Cincinnati

October, 1997

Page 7: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 8: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 9: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 10: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 11: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 12: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 13: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 14: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 15: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 16: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 17: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 18: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 19: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 20: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 21: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 22: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 23: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 24: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 25: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 26: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 27: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 28: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 29: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 30: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 31: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 32: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 33: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 34: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 35: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 36: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 37: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 38: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 39: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 40: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 41: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 42: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 43: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 44: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 45: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 46: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 47: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 48: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 49: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 50: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 51: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 52: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 53: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 54: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 55: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 56: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 57: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 58: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 59: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 60: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 61: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 62: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 63: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 64: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 65: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 66: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 67: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 68: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 69: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 70: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 71: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 72: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 73: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 74: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 75: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 76: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 77: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 78: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 79: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 80: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 81: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 82: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 83: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 84: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 85: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 86: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant
Page 87: On Webwork - Xavier University · 2016-11-03 · An exception was Arthur Sullivant Hoffman, who disparaged the Keeler law in his 1922 Fundamentals of Fiction Writing. The relevant