onference organising committee · 2014. 5. 26. · martina franzen science and technology unit,...

28
1

Upload: others

Post on 11-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

1

Page 2: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

CONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE

Beverley Gibbs

Eleanor Hadley Kershaw

Brigitte Nerlich

Warren Pearce

Harinee Selvadurai

Adam Spencer

Judith Tsouvalis

All this yearʼs organisers are part of the Making Science Public programme at the University of Nottingham. Please come and say hello in person during the conference.

The committee would like to thank all the panel convenors for their efforts in shaping the intellectual agenda of SIP13, and to everyone presenting a paper and attending the conference. We have been delighted by your interest and support.

Finally, many thanks to our team of on-the-ground helpers manning the registration desk and helping you to find your way around during your visit to Nottingham:

Shih-Hsin Chen, Xiao Feng, Carlos Cuevas Garcia, Richard Helliwell, Kate Roach, Li Ruijing,  Andrews Safalaoh, Georgina Wood.

2

Page 3: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

INDEX

LIST OF PANELS, PROGRAMME GRID " " " " " " " 4

WELCOME TO NOTTINGHAM" " " " " " " " " 5

KEYNOTE ADDRESS & DISCUSSION" " " " " " " " 6

LIST OF PANELS" " " " " " " " " " 7

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS" " " " " " " 22

TRANSPORT, PHARMACY & UNION SHOP" " " " " " 23

MAKING SCIENCE PUBLIC PROGRAMME" " " " " " 24

SCIENCE IN PUBLIC HISTORY" " " " " " " 26

CAMPUS MAP"" " " " " " " " " 28

SCHEDULE OVERVIEW, DETAILED LOCATION MAP" " " " BACK COVER

"

3

Page 4: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

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

=BDC F$!F5<T5&(0Q&+9<7$'&>+?(II&<.AOCF$!F5<T5&(0Q&+9<7$'&>+?(II&<.AOCF$!F5<T5&(0Q&+9<7$'&>+?(II&<.AOCF$!F5<T5&(0Q&+9<7$'&>+?(II&<.AOC

I,*$%>0&!""# $%&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/ $2&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/ $%%&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/ $[&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/AH>A?AB>A +8+&F!5$R=$+8&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C+8+&F!5$R=$+8&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C+8+&F!5$R=$+8&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C+8+&F!5$R=$+8&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/CAB>A?=AAA !567+8!$879:;<9==55&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C!567+8!$879:;<9==55&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C!567+8!$879:;<9==55&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C!567+8!$879:;<9==55&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C=AAA?==>A =FE=&+,-/0,/&I-,?-"0B&1",-(.&,"01?@A,?-"0KKKC$<@-?-\A-0J&1,-/0,/&]"A@0(.-1#& !"#!"#$%&'(')*)&'%&))"%&' $%(+#,,($)-%#.(,/%(/*$$.(0)"/)01%*&,

==>A?==DC F!5$RF!5$RF!5$RF!5$R==DC?=>=C =FE%$+,-/0,/&I-,?-"0B&1",-(.&,"01?@A,?-"0KKK%AE=&E(Y-0J&/LM/@?-1/&MAO.-,KKK =E=&!/1M"01-O./&-00"N(?-"0 %C&+,-/0,/^MAO.-,&-0?/@(,?-"01=>=C?=D=C 'T:<U&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C'T:<U&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C'T:<U&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C'T:<U&><."-1?/@1B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C=D=C?=CDC !&XAO.-,&/0J(J/#/0?B&/#/@J/0?&M".-?-,1KKK %AE%&E(Y-0J&/LM/@?-1/&MAO.-,KKK =E%&!/1M"01-O./&-00"N(?-"0 $&(2%3)$$#,(*4()15%/,(6(")'73#1%*&

=CDC?=G=C 8U$:R+B&X!7_5&67`7:6B&U$:a9`5!&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C8U$:R+B&X!7_5&67`7:6B&U$:a9`5!&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C8U$:R+B&X!7_5&67`7:6B&U$:a9`5!&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C8U$:R+B&X!7_5&67`7:6B&U$:a9`5!&>$%B&U-JHI-/.Q1&U"A1/C=G>A FT+&8!$:+=5!&89&5$+8&E7a'$:a+&X$!RD$VFT+&8!$:+=5!&89&5$+8&E7a'$:a+&X$!RD$VFT+&8!$:+=5!&89&5$+8&E7a'$:a+&X$!RD$VFT+&8!$:+=5!&89&5$+8&E7a'$:a+&X$!RD$V

4

LIST OF PANELSLIST OF PANELSLIST OF PANELSLIST OF PANELSLIST OF PANELS

Panel name Session 1 Session 2 Room1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

11

13

14

15

17

18

20

22

23

24

Responsible Innovation Tue 11.45 Tue 14.15 Highfields, A11

Exploring mutual influences between science, politics & public in technoscientific controversies & conflicts Mon 10.15 Mon 12.00 L&SS, A2

New trends in science communication through interactive science and technology centers Mon 10.15 Mon 12.00 L&SS, A4

The stuff of engagement: The material and affective in science in public Mon 10.15 Mon 12.00 L&SS, A1

Critiquing (critical) science journalism Tue 10.00 Highfields, A2

Science v. the Greens? Mon 12.00 L&SS, A3

Improving the visibility of academic research: strategic interests and normative expectations Mon 10.15 L&SS, A3

Public engagement and the emergent politics of public mediation Tue 14.15 Highfields, A1

Are you sitting comfortably? The untapped potential of oral storytelling in public engagement with science. Mon 17.30 L&SS, A3

Science and the public in African states Mon 17.30 L&SS, A1

Framing and perceiving geoengineering Tue 10.00 Highfields, A11

Public science: Science communications in everyday situations Mon 15.45 L&SS, A3

Public communication of science & technology by universities, research centres, scientists or researchers Mon 15.45 Mon 17.30 L&SS, A4

Science fiction and the social construction of science and technology Tue 10.00 Tue 11.45 Highfields, A1

Making science public in the food system Mon 17.30 L&SS, A2

Making expertise public: dilemmas, conflicts and controversies Tue 11.45 Tue 14.15 Highfields, A2

Collins in context: a keynote discussion Mon 15.45 L&SS, A1

Social media, public engagement and the history of science, technology & medicine Mon 15.45 L&SS, A2

Mass media, science communication, and the shaping of perceptions Tue 10.00 Highfields, A9

Page 5: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

WELCOME TO NOTTINGHAM...

...and the 8th Science in Public (SiP) conference, proudly organised and hosted by the Making Science Public programme at the University of Nottingham.

In 2006, Alice Bell and Sarah Davies had the idea to hold an event for postgraduates called ʻScience and the Publicʼ at Imperial College, London. Since then, the conference has been held by a different UK university each year, growing into a full-scale conference with a wide participation amongst academic and practitioner communities. In 2012, the name was changed to ʻScience in Publicʼ, referencing Gregory and Millerʼs 1998 book of the same name and reflecting changes towards work on dialogue, engagement and interactive communication. This year, we are thrilled to welcome over 120 delegates from Japan, Brazil, United States, Germany, Italy, Israel, Portugal, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Ireland and the UK to SIP13, including founding organisers Alice and Sarah who both return as panel convenors.

As this yearʼs hosts, the Making Science Public team have sought to emphasise critical perspectives on ʻscience in publicʼ in the conference programme. We are optimistic that this aim has been achieved, as the SIP community responded to our call with over 80 abstracts submitted across a broad range of research topics, including science centres, storytelling, expertise, emotion, geoengineering and journalism. In addition to these presented papers, SIP13 also welcomes Professor Harry Collins, one of the foremost names in science studies, to deliver our keynote address and discuss his work with a critics roundtable.

With a rich programme of research being presented and a global community in attendance, we hope that SiP13 offers you fresh opportunities in sharing your own work, learning from others and offering new perspectives on the three interrelated questions of making, of science, and of public.

Beverley Gibbs & Warren Pearce

on behalf of the SIP13 organising committee

5

Page 6: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

KEYNOTE ADDRESS

Can scientists ʻshow their workingʼ?Harry Collins University of Cardiff

Monday, July 22nd, 14.30-15.30Law and Social Sciences B62

Abstract:It seems almost impossible to argue against the position that if scientists revealed more of their work to citizens then citizens would be able to contribute more fully to scientific and technological decision-making. This would square scientific expertise with democracy. I argue, however, that this is a dream. Not even other scientists can understand the intricacies of what goes on within the core-set of a disputed technical domain. Furthermore, the way disputes unfold within and without science are crucially different. To mix the inside of science with the outside world could realise the the slogan of certain STS scholars: 'science is a continuation of politics by other means.

KEYNOTE DISCUSSION

Collins in contextChair: Judith Tsouvalis Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Monday, July 22nd, 15.45-17.15Law and Social Sciences A1

Anne Kerr University of LeedsSujatha Raman Making Science Public, University of NottinghamJack Stilgoe University College LondonJames Wilsdon SPRU, University of Sussex

The panellists will collectively explore the question of the proper relationship between science, expertise, politics and publics, with reference to the work of Professor Harry Collins on expertise and policy-making. What should be the roles of experts and publics in technical decision-making? How ought we to think about the relationship between scientific and political considerations in this context? What can STS contribute to this debate? These are some of the questions the panellists will consider in 10-12 minute statements followed by a response from Professor Collins and an open discussion.

6

Page 7: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

7

LIST OF PANELS

Page 8: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

8

2.1 | EXPLORING MUTUAL INFLUENCES BETWEEN SCIENCE, POLITICS AND PUBLIC IN CONTROVERSIES AND CONFLICTS | Law and Social Sciences, A2

Panel Convenor: Giuseppe Tipaldo,

University of Turin, Italy

The wounded scientists: What the experts experienced through public communication after the Fukushima incident Ikuko Kase University of Tokyo, JapanNozomi Mizushima University of Tokyo, JapanKeiichi Nakagagwa, University of Tokyo, Japan Osamu Sakura University of Tokyo, Japan

Geological disposal: A 200-year full-scale experiment with public engagement?Catharina Landström University of East Anglia

When science trembles. Presenting a model of mutual relationships between science, politics, media and society in the case of the Italian scientists conviction for the earthquake in LʼAquilaGiuseppe Tipaldo University of Turin, Italy

3.1 | NEW TRENDS IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION THROUGH INTERACTIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTERS | Law and Social Sciences, A4

Panel Convenors:Erik Stengler, University of the West of England

Guillermo Fernandez, University Pumpeu Fabra, Barcelona

The role of science centres in societyMatthew Wotton University of West England

Do science centres really engage in dialogue with the public?Hannah Owen University of West England

Inclusive museums as contributors to social changeAnna Omedes Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 10.15-11.45

Page 9: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

9

4.1 | THE STUFF OF ENGAGEMENT: THE MATERIAL AND AFFECTIVE IN SCIENCE IN PUBLIC | Law and Social Sciences, A1

Panel Convenors: Sarah Davies & Adam Bencard

University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Public engagement in a systems approach: Science in a deliberative societySarah Davies University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Translating KhatSimon Parry University of Manchester

Rock and awe: materiality, affect and the use of underground research laboratories in stakeholder engagement about geological disposal of nuclear wastePeter Simmons University of East Anglia

7 | IMPROVING THE VISIBILITY OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH: STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND NORMATIVE EXPECTATIONS | Law and Social Sciences, A3

Panel Convenors: Martina Franzen, Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefeld, Germany.

Arlena Jung, Social Science Research Center, Berlin, Germany

The (dys)functionality of visible science: a comparative perspective on science in the mediaMartina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, GermanyArlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin, Germany

Pride and prejudice: science communication from within a science institute Gabriele Frias

Staging Science: new approaches in science communication, popular and artistic science performance Miira Hill Technische Universitat Berlin

Secrets and Liabilities: Exploring the challenge for academic institutions of making non-human animal research more ʻvisibleʼ to publicsCarmen McLeod Making Science Public, University of NottinghamPru Hobson-West Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 10.15-11.45

Page 10: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

10

2.2 | EXPLORING MUTUAL INFLUENCES BETWEEN SCIENCE, POLITICS AND PUBLIC IN CONTROVERSIES AND CONFLICTS | Law and Social Sciences, A2

Panel Convenor: Giuseppe Tipaldo, University of Turin, Italy

Role and function of science media centres between science, politics, mass media and their publics in technoscientific controversies Simone Rödder University of Hamburg, Germany

Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? Striking the balance between responsible and impactful communication of environmental research to policy-makers Franca Davenport University of West of England

The science and politics of evidence based policy Steffan John Swansea University

From truth to patents: What kind of "knowledge" guides our societies?Aline Guevara Villegas National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

3.2 | NEW TRENDS IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION THROUGH INTERACTIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTERS | Law and Social Sciences, A4

Panel Convenors: Erik Stengler, University of the West of England,

Guillermo Fernandez, University Pumpeu Fabra, Barcelona

Motivations for volunteering in three UK science centresBonnie Buckley

The introduction of museums and science centers in social networksCecelia Cavalcanti Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Encouraging creativity: novel learning environments in science and technology centres.Melanie Davies University of West England

Is there room For museology principles in the design and day-to-day running of a science centre?Erik Stengler University of the West of EnglandGuillermo Fernandez University Pumpeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 12.00-13.30

Page 11: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

11

4.2 THE STUFF OF ENGAGEMENT: THE MATERIAL AND AFFECTIVE IN SCIENCE IN PUBLIC | Law and Social Sciences, A1

Panel Convenors: Sarah Davies & Adam Bencard

University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Not a museum with things, but a museum about thingness – possible strategies for deepening material encounters in a museum contextAdam Bencard University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Material deliberation as public engagement in the Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) network Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone Arizona State University, USA

Whatʼs happening midstream? Making the material materialBeverley Gibbs Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

6 | SCIENCE VS THE GREENS? | Law and Social Sciences, A3Panel Convenor:

Alice Bell, SPRU, University of Sussex

Why the Green movement is not anti-scienceAnne Chapman Greenhouse Thinktank

Messing with Nature? Public perceptions of geoengineering & their implications for the ʻgreens vs scienceʼ debateAdam Corner Cardiff University

The “New Environmentalists”James Murray Business Green

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 12.00-13.30

Page 12: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

12

22 | COLLINS IN CONTEXT: A KEYNOTE DISCUSSION | Law and Social Sciences, A1

Discussion chair: Judith Tsouvalis, Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

The panellists will collectively explore the question of the proper relationship between science, expertise, politics and publics, with reference to the work of Professor Harry Collins on expertise and policy-making. What should be the roles of experts and publics in technical decision-making? How ought we think about the relationship between scientific and political considerations in this context? What can STS contribute to this debate? These are some of the questions the panellists will consider in 10-12 minute statements followed by a response from Professor Collins and an open discussion.

Anne Kerr University of LeedsSujatha Raman Making Science Public, University of NottinghamJack Stilgoe University College LondonJames Wilsdon SPRU, University of Sussex

23 | SOCIAL MEDIA, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & MEDICINE | Law and Social Sciences, A2

Panel convenor: Rebekah Higgitt Royal Museums Greenwich

Alice Bell University of Sussex Gregory Hollin University of NottinghamLucy Veale University of Nottingham Rebekah Higgitt Royal Museums Greenwich (online from iCHSTM 2013)Vanessa Heggie University of Birmingham (online from iCHSTM 2013)Nathaniel C Comfort Johns Hopkins University (online)Darin Hayton Haverford College (online)

Fittingly, this session uses social media to bring together, online, a panel of individuals at two conferences and in two countries, to discuss the issues raised by engaging with different audiences through social media. The panel sits within the programmes of both SiP13 and the Manchester-based International Congress for History of Science, Technology and Medicine, and includes several short presentations before opening out to wider discussion.

The focus will be on individuals’ experiences of using social media to reach out to wider, or other, audiences on the history of science, technology and medicine. Speakers will probe the categories of academia, social media and the public, and discuss the importance of listening and two-way communication rather than simply broadcasting. Participants will reflect on the ways in which online context may change what we choose to say, and how, and what we can learn from those who have interacted with groups that have very different agendas. It is clear that social media blurs the lines between expert and lay, colleagues and public, subjects and audiences, and that this can be hugely rewarding and productive, but also provocative and troubling.

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 15.45-17.15

Page 13: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

13

14 | PUBLIC SCIENCE: SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS IN EVERYDAY SITUATIONS | Law and Social Sciences, A3

Panel Convenor: Kimberly Arcand, Chandra X-ray Center/Smithsonian

Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Mass. USA

From churches to pavements: urban geology and paleontology in Algarve Luís Azevedo Rodrigues Centro Ciencia Viva de Lagos, Portugal Margarida Agostinho Rita Manteigas

Why do scientists engage in public science events? Motivation, experience and evaluationRhian Salmon Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

15.1 | PUBLIC COMMUNICATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY UNIVERSITIES, RESEARCH CENTRES, SCIENTISTS OR RESEARCHERS AND SOCIETY RIGHTS | Law and Social Sciences, A4

Panel Convenor: Carlos Teixeira, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Showing public value: factors supporting researchersʼ attitudes to open scienceAnn Grand University of West England

Who cares about physics today? A marketing strategy for the survival of fundamental science and the benefit of societyUmberto Cannella

Communication & engagement practices at CERNJamie Dorey Open University

What would the public want?Ash Choudry Notts Science

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 15.45-17.15

Page 14: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

14

10 | ARE YOU SITTING COMFORTABLY? THE UNTAPPED POTENTIAL OF ORAL STORYTELLING IN PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WITH SCIENCE | Law and Social Sciences, A3

Panel Convenor: Sophia Collins, Tales from the River

Tales of the wild: storytelling and landscape scale conservationLisa Schneidau Devon Wildlife Trust

The story collider: where science and storytelling combineBrian Wecht Storycollider

Edinburgh Beltaneʼs storytelling journeyHeather Rea Beltane Public Engagement Network

11 | SCIENCE AND THE PUBLIC IN AFRICAN STATES | Law and Social Sciences, A1

Panel Convenors: Nate Sawadogo & Yao-Martin Donani,

University of Nottingham

Ugandan science cafés in schoolsDuncan Dallas Café Scientifique

Obstacles to the expansion of science and technology for socioeconomic development in GhanaYao-Martin Donani University of Nottingham

Models for science capacity building in Africa – an international comparisonNate Sawadogo University of Nottingham

Civil society, innovation and development: A case study of Bt Cotton in Burkina Faso Eveline Compaore University of Nottingham

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 17.30-19.00

Page 15: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

15

15.2 | PUBLIC COMMUNICATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY UNIVERSITIES, RESEARCH CENTRES, SCIENTISTS OR RESEARCHERS AND SOCIETY RIGHTS | Law and Social Sciences, A4

Panel Convenor: Carlos Teixeira, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Universities ʻcommunicatingʼ science with primary schools: a practitionerʼs reflections on what, why and howHannah Crookes University of Nottingham

Researching the researcher: Conflicts of interest in addiction research & advocacyDavid Miller University of Bath Claire Harkins University of Bath

Practices and images of research communication by Italian scientists over the past five yearsAdriana Valente Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali (IRPPS), Italy Alba LʼAstorina Istituto di Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dellʼambiente (IREA), ItalySveva Avveduto Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali (IRPPS), ItalyLoredana Cerbara Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali ,Italy

Public communication of science and technology by universities, research centres, scientists and researchersCarlos Teixeira University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

18 | MAKING SCIENCE PUBLIC IN THE FOOD SYSTEM | Law and Social Sciences, A2

Panel Convenor: Adam Spencer, Making Science Public,

University of Nottingham

What shapes public opinion? The case of public consultations throughout the French GM debateElodie Brule-Gapihan Univeristy of Reims, France

Humans, other animals and risk framing in movements for 'One Health'Angela Cassidy Imperial College

Food security as a frame: exploring the politics and their consequencesAdam Spencer Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Monday, 22nd July 2013, 17.30-19.00

Page 16: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

16

5 | CRITIQUING (CRITICAL) SCIENCE JOURNALISM | Highfields House, A2

Panel convenors:Kristian Nielsen, Gunver Lystbaek Vestergaard,

University of Aarhus, Germany

The use and portrayal of scientific expertise in climate change coverage in Austrian newspapersAnja Bauer University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Markus Pikl University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

My research, our findings: scientistsʼ stories in television interviewsRony Armon Technion - Israel Institute of TechnologyAyelet Baram-Tsabari Technion - Israel Institute of Technology

Water and oil donʼt mix – on journalistic dissemination of researchCharlotte Wien University of Southern Denmark

Do science media centres hinder or facilitate critical science journalism?Simone Rödder KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Germany.

13 | FRAMING AND PERCEIVING GEOENGINEERING | Highfields House, A11

Panel Convenor: Adam Corner, Cardiff University

Media representations of geoengineering: constructing hopes and fears through metaphor useRusi Jaspal de Montfort University

Framing and perceiving geoengineeringKirsty Kuo University of Cambridge

Geo-engineering: framing, justice and public responsesDuncan McLaren Lancaster Environmental Centre.

The construction of geoengineering on WikipediaNills Markusson University of Oxford.

Public attitudes to geoengineering: the danger of “going rogue” and other framingsKaren Parkhill Cardiff University

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 10.00-11.30

Page 17: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

17

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 10.00-11.30

17.1 | SCIENCE FICTION AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | Highfields House, A1

Panel Convenor: Christopher Leslie, Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Edward Bellamy and the future of the future Anthony P. Pennino Stevens Institute of Technology, USA

Detectives show how science is done Katherine Roach

The source of magic Sean Wilcock Leeds Metropolitan University

“The predicted internet isnʼt the internet at all!”: The mutual influence of science fiction and innovation Georgina Voss University of Brighton

24 | MASS MEDIA, SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, AND THE SHAPING OF PERCEPTIONS | Highfields House, A9

Panel Convenor: Judith Tsouvalis, Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

On alerters, analysts, and critics: The roles of researchers in Austrian newspapers Andrea Tony Hermann University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.Markus Pikl University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.Anja Bauer University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Producing a public image for the human genome project: Comparing the Greek to the international experience Constantinos Morfakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Tobacco in the media: an analysis of the Spanish press from the perspective of framing: E l País, E l Mundo, Abc and La RazónPilar Paricio Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Valencia, Spain.Cristina Rodríguez Luque Universidad CEU San Pablo. Madrid, Spain.Francisco Núñez-Romero Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Valencia, Spain.

The silences of science Felicity Mellor Imperial College London

Page 18: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

18

1.1 | RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION | Highfields House, A11Panel Convenor:

Jack Stilgoe, University College London

Responsible InnovationJack Stilgoe University College London

Responsible Research and Innovation: Construction of a new European value?Stevienna de Saille Making Science Public, University of Sheffield

To be confirmedRichard Jones University of Sheffield

Unstructured Care for the Future: a study of responsible innovation of medical technologiesAnne Kerr Leeds UniversityChris Till Leeds University Paul Ellwood Leeds University

17.2 | SCIENCE FICTION AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | Highfields House, A1

Panel Convenor: Christopher Leslie, Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Confusion,Control and Comfort: Premediating Identity management in Film and television Georgina Turner Loughborough University Liesbet van Zoonan Loughborough University

“The evil science”: unethical biomedical science as the bases for dystopian fiction Jimena Escudero Perez University of Oviedo, Spain

Worlds that tell stories, stories that tell worlds: diegesis and mimesis in science fiction and technoscience Paul Raven University of Sheffield

From science fiction to design fiction Jon Turney

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 11.45-13.15

Page 19: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

19

20.1 | MAKING EXPERTISE PUBLIC: DILEMMAS, CONFLICTS AND CONTROVERSIES | Highfields House, A2

Panel Convenors: Warren Pearce, Sujatha Raman,

Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Hail to the Chief: experts, publics and the future of scientific advice in Whitehall James Wilsdon SPRU, University of Sussex

Re-thinking expertise through medico-legal reports in TurkeyBasak Can University of Pennsylvania, USA

Making expertise public? The new RCT movement in UK public policyWarren Pearce Making Science Public, University of NottinghamSujatha Raman Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

25 | SCIENCE-PUBLIC INTERACTIONS | Highfields House, A9

Panel Convenor: Judith Tsouvalis, Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Working with/on renewable energy science in StocksbridgeAnna Krzywoszynska Durham University

“Nuclear energy sounded wonderful 40 years ago”: ʻEngagedʼ and ʻnon-engagedʼ citizens views on CCSSimon J Lock University College London Melanie Smallman University College London

“Youʼre never more than two degrees from a robot arm”: Hackspaces, boundary objects and the artsGeorgina Voss University of Brighton

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 11.45-13.15

Page 20: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

20

1.2 | RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION | Highfields House, A11

Panel Convenor: Jack Stilgoe, University College London

Shifts, slippages and turf-wars of ʻResponsible InnovationʼSally Randles University of Manchester

Examining responsible innovation in the biosciencesRob Smith University of Nottingham

Responsible innovation and nanotechnologies in the ECJon Turney

Blocking the silver bullet: Public ethics and the governance of a GMO pathway in Kenyan agricultureStephen Whitfield Institute of Development Studies

8 | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND THE EMERGENT POLITICS OF PUBLIC MEDIATION | Highfields House, A1

Panel Convenor: Nick Mahony, Open University

MAKE Magazine and the instruction of risk managementJosef Nguyen UC Davis, USA

Which Publics? The politics of involving different publics in dialogue around science and technology Alison Mohr Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Mediated participation and adaptation to environmental change: A theoretical framework for evaluating public engagement as citizenship in mass communication about the transition to a low carbon future Brenda McNally Dublin City University, Ireland

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 14.15-15.45

Page 21: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

21

20.2 | MAKING EXPERTISE PUBLIC: DILEMMAS, CONFLICTS AND CONTROVERSIES | Highfields House, A2

Panel Convenors: Warren Pearce, Sujatha Raman,

Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

Making scientific risk assessment public: EFSA, GM animals and public knowledgeSarah Hartley Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

BRIDGE: examining the tensions and transparency issues between scientists, policy makers and other stakeholders in the deliberative co-creation of science-policy communication tools in IrelandJoanna Rourke Trinity College Dublin, IrelandAnna Davies Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

The Science Media Centre: An empirical evaluationDavid Miller University of Bath

26 | DILEMMAS OF ETHICS AND REGULATION IN SCIENCE | Highfields House, A9

Panel Convenor: Judith Tsouvalis, Making Science Public, University of Nottingham

A case study in the regulation of nano-particles under the European Biocidal Products Directive Michael Reinsborough Arizona State University, USA.

Normalising the enhancement discourse: Genetics, social structures and moral generalisationOliver Feeney National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Social dynamics of biomedical science: An explanation for the impasse in the animal experimentation debate about primate use?Michelle Hudson-Shore University of Nottingham & FRAME

Tuesday 23rd July, 2013, 14.15-15.45

Page 22: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

This year, proceedings from Science in Public will be published as an e-book. Presenters who wish a version of their paper to appear in the e-book of proceedings should submit their paper to [email protected] by 30 August 2013 and adhere to the following style.

Word limit: 1500 words.

Title: Should be in Arial 14 point bold, and centre aligned.

Name: State author’s name, email address and institutional affiliation. If there is more than one author please nominate one as corresponding author.

Section headings: Use Arial 12 point bold capitals, left aligned.

Main text: Arial 12 point, left aligned.

References: Use Harvard system of referencing (Author 2012, p. 3) and not (Author 2012:3). List references in alphabetical order at the end of the paper.

Please note, papers submitted that deviate from this style will be returned to authors for correction.

22

Page 23: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

TRANSPORT

Further information on transport is available at any time from the registration desk - please ask any of our team for details.

Buses to University Park from Beeston Station (and return):

Buses from Beeston train station include the number 13 and 14 buses, which pick up nearby and go to the university. No. 13 goes through the campus (stopping outside building 16 (Portland Hill) and on East Drive – please see campus map) and the No. 14 goes down university boulevard. There are other buses to choose from at Beeston bus station but this is a 10 minute walk from Beeston Station. You could walk the whole way from the station to University Park in approx. 25-30 minutes.

Buses to University Park from Nottingham City Centre (and return):

Nottingham City Transportʼs 34 line between University Park and the city centre runs a permanent seven day a week service. Buses run every 15 minutes during the day (including weekends) and every 20 minutes in the evenings. Buses stop outside building 16 (Portland Hill) and on East Drive (please see campus map).

Shuttle bus from campus to East Midlands Parkway station

If you pre-booked this service when registering, the bus will leave at 16.30 on Tuesday, after conference closes.

Taxis:

Cable Cars taxi number is 0115 922 9229. There is a taxi rank at Beeston train station but it is small and it might be wise to book ahead. It is an approximately 5-10 minute taxi journey and probably the best option for those not familiar with the area. If you require a taxi for your onward journey from conference, please contact the registration desk who will be happy to book for you.

23

PHARMACY & UNION SHOPThere is a Bootsʼ pharmacy on the lower ground floor of the Portland building, two minutes walk from conference venues (building 15 on maps).

Opposite Bootsʼ is the Studentsʼ Union shop, which sells a range of food, stationery, clothing etc.

Page 24: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

MAKING SCIENCE PUBLIC: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIESLeverhulme Trust Research Programme

In the UK , over the last 20 years, a series of political crises have challenged the authority of science (MMR vaccine), the integrity of research (“Climategate”), , the governance of controversial new technologies (GM crops), and the role of expert advice and evidence in policymaking (BSE; David Nuttʼs resignation over drug policy). This has contributed to a widely held perception of a lack of public trust in science, decline in the capacity of science to underpin political legitimacy, and tensions in the relationship between government and science. In principle, a solution to these problems is to make the practice, use and assessment of science in policy-making and political participation more public, open and democratic. For example:

• UK government has sponsored initiatives on transparency in scientific advice for policy making, promoting scientific literacy, building public trust in science, and engaging the public on the implications of new research.

• Public debate has been fostered by increases both in media interest in science and pressure on scientists to engage with the media.

• Online, social media usage has created new spaces of ʻscientific citizenshipʼ in which different groups promote or contest scientific knowledge and its use, allowing other forms of authority, such as religion, to re-enter debates about science and technology.

• Patient advocacy groups are becoming involved with advances in biomedical knowledge and seeking to influence research programmes.

• Moves to promote much greater openness within the practice of science itself through open access academic publishing and open source computer code.

However, such opportunities for science to be more openly practiced and discussed, for government to promote integrity and transparency in policy making, and for various publics to influence political decision-making through science are counterbalanced by a number of challenges, including:

The rise of science/industry partnerships and the privatisation of knowledge: Science and technology are promoted by governments as the main source of innovation and a major driver of economic growth and competition. The rise of the knowledge economy, the increasing importance of intellectual property and greater commercialisation of public research are all making science more “private”. This has prompted calls for science to more explicitly serve the public good.

The proliferation of expertise and politicisation of science: With the institutionalisation of scientific advice in government, scientific evidence appears to be the currency of many political debates, leading to concerns that value judgments are marginalised. However, many leading scientists argue that policymakers pay scant attention to scientific evidence and that the use of science is politicised; different stakeholders merely cherry-pick studies that support their own political position.

The challenges of public engagement with science: Empirical studies of public participation find a tendency to ʻclose downʼ rather than ʻopen upʼ issues for debate and policy options. Difficulties that lay people have with scrutinizing expertise and engaging in discussion about different ethical assumptions around science have also been charted.

24

Page 25: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

Previous scholarship has addressed separate aspects of these issues, but there has been no systematic attempt to study the challenges of making science more public and the consequences for the relationship between science and politics on, a comparative basis across a number of key domains. This multidisciplinary programme seeks to address this important gap in knowledge.Key questions:

· What is meant by making science more public, open or transparent? Who are ʻthe publicʼ and how are they constituted?

· What might ʻpublic scienceʼ mean for the authority and independence of science and the capacity of publics to engage with science?

· What are the political implications of making science more public and how does this relate to issues of legitimacy and transparency in politics and policy making?

· How will such changes help address the problems outlined above?

The Making Science Public programme addresses these questions across a number of projects looking at food, agriculture & animals; energy & environment; and health & social policy, bringing together findings in these areas to explore the implications for the theory and practice of democracy. The programme runs until 2017.

Research programme team · Brigitte Nerlich, Director · Sujatha Raman, Deputy Director · Harinee Selvadurai, Programme Manager · Saul Becker · Pru Hobson-West · John Holmwood · Vivien Lowndes · Paul Martin (University of Sheffield)  · Kate Millar · Alison Mohr · Carol Morris · Susanne Seymour · Alexander Smith (University of Warwick) · Warren Pearce· Adam Spencer· Judith Tsouvalis· Sarah Hartley· Carmen McLeod· Stevienna de Saille· Eleanor Hadley Kershaw

www.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublichttp://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic @MakingSciPub

25

Page 26: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

SCIENCE IN PUBLIC HISTORY

2012 - University College London

2011 - University of Kingston

2010 - Imperial College London

2009 - University of Brighton

2008 - University of Manchester

2007 - Imperial College London

For links to previous conference programmes and more information about Science in

Public, please visit our website http://scienceinpublic.org

26

Page 27: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

24

-ho

ur

secu

rity

co

nta

ct

(0

115)

951 3

013

Lento

n L

odge

Pave

men

t Res

earc

h B

uild

ing

Pope

Build

ing

Sir C

live

Gra

nger

Build

ing

Sir P

eter

Man

sfie

ld B

uild

ing

The

Hem

sley

The

Orc

har

ds

Tow

er B

uild

ing

Vau

ghan

Par

ry W

illam

s Pa

vilio

nW

olfso

n B

uild

ing

Arc

hitec

ture

and B

uilt

Envi

ronm

ent

Chem

ical

and E

nvi

ronm

enta

l Engin

eering

Chem

istr

yCiv

il Engin

eering

Culture

s, L

anguag

es a

nd A

rea

Stu

die

sEco

nom

ics

Ele

ctrica

l an

d E

lect

ronic

Engin

eering

Englis

h S

tudie

sG

eogra

phy

Hea

lth S

cien

ces

Hum

anitie

sLa

wLi

fe S

cien

ces

Mat

hem

atic

al S

cien

ces

Mec

han

ical

, M

ater

ials

and M

anufa

cturing E

ngin

eering

Med

icin

eM

RC I

nst

itute

of H

earing R

esea

rch

Musi

c

Car

eers

and E

mplo

yabili

ty S

ervi

ceChild

care

Ser

vice

sCoat

es R

oad

Auditorium

Com

puting S

ervi

ces

Cripps

Hea

lth C

entr

e/Chem

ist/

Den

tist

Est

ates

Offic

eFa

ith/P

raye

r Room

sG

eorg

e G

reen

Lib

rary

Gra

duat

e Sch

ool

Gre

enfiel

d M

edic

al L

ibra

ryH

allw

ard L

ibra

ryKei

ghto

n A

uditorium

14/17

29/30/31/36 28

31/35/36/39/41 11 16 37 11 16

46/48

5/33/55 7

23/46 20

31/36/38/39/41/42

37/46/48 40 33

Phar

mac

yPh

ysic

s an

d A

stro

nom

yPo

litic

s an

d I

nte

rnat

ional

Rel

atio

ns

Psyc

holo

gy

Soci

olo

gy

and S

oci

al P

olic

y

26/44

18/22/25 7 29 7

15/27

1/3 51 53 19 21 15 24 10 46 9 56

2 35 27 16 18 8 6 37 47 41

Languag

e Cen

tre

Muse

um

Nott

ingham

New

Thea

tre

Rec

ital

Hal

lSec

urity

Contr

ol

Sport

sStu

den

t Ser

vice

s Cen

tre

Stu

den

ts’ U

nio

n/R

etai

l/Fo

od C

ourt

Univ

ersi

ty o

f N

ott

ingham

Sport

s an

dSoci

al C

lub

Lento

n E

aves

Lento

n F

ield

sLe

nto

n G

rove

Lento

n H

urs

t

4 3 5 52

The

Dow

ns

Mill

enniu

mG

arden

Bee

ston L

ane

Library Road

Jubi

lee

Aven

ue

To L

ong

Eat

on

Broa

dgat

e

To B

eest

on

A646

4 W

oods

ide

Road

A52

Der

by R

oad

Ring R

oad

Lake

side

Wal

k

A52

Scie

nce

Road

Triumph Road

To J

ubile

eCam

pus

and

Innov

atio

n P

ark

To K

ing’s

Mea

dow

Cam

pus

(0.5

mile

s)

To K

ing’s

Mea

dow

Cam

pus

(0.5

mile

s)

53

46

1

12 32

3

34

4

0200

met

res

G

G

Aca

dem

ic s

cho

ols

an

d d

ep

art

men

ts (

A-Z

)O

ther

serv

ices

(A-Z

)N

am

ed

bu

ild

ing

s (A

-Z)

Sw

imm

ing

Pool

Nig

hti

ng

ale

Ab

bey

Ho

use

An

cast

er

Wil

lou

gh

by

Lento

nH

ouse

Flo

ren

ceB

oo

t

Ru

tlan

d

Derb

y

Lin

coln

No

ttin

gh

am

Un

ivers

ity

Ho

spit

als

NH

S T

rust

Qu

een

’s M

ed

ical

Cen

tre (

QM

C)

Dunki

rk

Hig

hfiel

ds

Park

Bro

adgat

ePa

rk

To M

1Jc

n 2

5(5

mile

s)

To J

ubile

eCam

pus

(1 m

ile)

To c

ity

centr

e(2

.5 m

iles)

Wolla

ton P

ark

To c

ity

centr

e(3

mile

s)

To M

1Jc

n 2

4(1

1 m

iles)

Prio

ryIs

land

Pedes

tria

n/c

ycle

route

to J

ubile

eCam

pus

04/2

013 ©

Cro

wn C

opyr

ight

Lice

nce

no.

100030223

G

Fitn

ess

Cen

tre

East

Drive

Coat

es R

oad

Boots

Sci

ence

Build

ing

Cen

tre

for

Bio

mole

cula

r Sci

ence

sCoat

es B

uild

ing

Engin

eering S

cien

ce L

earn

ing C

entr

eH

ighfiel

d H

ouse

Innov

ativ

e Te

chnolo

gy

Res

earc

h C

entr

eLa

kesi

de

Art

s Cen

tre

A6005

A6005

Uni

vers

ity

Bou

leva

rd

Bees

ton

Road

A6005AbbeyStreet

A6514MiddletonBoulevard

A620

0De

rby

Road

Cripps

Hill

Lent

onHal

lD

rive

Bees

ton

Lane

CutTh

roug

hLa

ne

Caven

dis

hSport

spitch

Sport

spitch Sp

ort

sC

en

tre

Med

ical

Sch

oo

l

11 50 12 33 1132/34/47 15 15 4

44 43 36 54 10 3849/50

Cri

pp

s

CP

P

P

Un

ivers

ity P

ark

Cam

pu

s

Nott

ingham

Tennis

Cen

tre

Sh

erw

oo

d

Jub

ilee

Cam

pu

s

Mai

n v

isitor

car

par

k

Caven

dis

h

Sh

erw

oo

d

24

-ho

ur

am

bu

lan

ce/

fire

/p

oli

ce(0

115)

951 8

888

To M

1jc

n.

26

(4.5

mile

s)

A52 Clifton

Boulev

ard

SO

UTH

EN

TR

AN

CE

WES

TEN

TR

AN

CE

NO

RTH

EN

TR

AN

CE

CHIN

AM

ALAY

SIA

UN

ITED

KIN

GD

OM

Tre

nt

Bu

ild

ing

Po

rtla

nd

Bu

ild

ing

N

PD

PD

PD

55

5

52

1417

48

19 18

16

25

22

20

24

2837

27

4351

4244

39

41

31353840

30 29

2623

21

33

50

49

12

7

13

11

15

9

86 47

56

The

Univ

ersi

ty o

f N

ott

ingham

Univ

ersi

ty P

ark

Nott

ingham

NG

7 2

RD

Po

stco

de f

or

sate

llit

en

avig

ati

on

: N

G7

2Q

L

10

3654

East

Mid

lan

ds

Co

nfe

ren

ceC

en

tre

i

Hig

hfiel

ds

Sport

s G

round

Sport

spitch

NET

Pha

se T

wo

tram

rou

te

Clo

iste

r Str

eet

G

CP P PD i

Publ

ic t

rans

port

info

rmat

ion

Publ

ic/H

oppe

r bu

s st

op

One

Way

Publ

ic b

us s

top

Aca

dem

ic b

uild

ings

Res

iden

ces

Oth

er s

ervi

ces

Con

fere

nce

park

ing

Blu

e-ba

dge

park

ing

Hop

per

bus

stop

Hig

hfie

lds

Park

vis

itor

park

ing

Foot

path

s

Gat

ehou

se

Pay

& D

ispl

ay v

isito

r pa

rkin

g

Bui

ldin

g un

der

cons

truc

tion

Tram

sto

p

Len

ton

&W

ort

ley

Cri

pp

s

Orc

hard

Ho

tel

Hu

gh

Ste

wart

27

Page 28: ONFERENCE ORGANISING COMMITTEE · 2014. 5. 26. · Martina Franzen Science and Technology Unit, University of Bielefield, Germany Arlena Jung Social Science Research Center, Berlin,

Highfields House: all through main entrance (Tue)

17

Law & Social Sciences: South Entrance for panels (Mon)

Law & Social Sciences: North Entrance for registration, welcome, keynote & lunch

SCHEDULE OVERVIEW

MONDAY, 22ND JULY 20139.00 Registration/coffee (Atrium, Law & Social Sciences)10.00-10.15 Welcome (B62, Law & Social Sciences)10.15-11.45 Panels11.45-12.00 Coffee break12.00-13.30 Panels13.30-14.30 Lunch (Atrium, Law & Social Sciences)14.30-15.30 Keynote by Harry Collins (B62, Law & Social Sciences)15.30-15.45 Coffee break15.45-17.15 Panels17.15-17.30 Coffee break17.30-19.00 Panels19.45 Conference barbecue at Staff Club, Hemsley Building

TUESDAY, 23RD JULY 20138.30-9.30 STS Breakfast (Highfields, A1) (pre-registered delegates only)9.30-10.00 Registration (Cloisters, Highfields)10.00-11.30 Panels11.30-11.45 Coffee break11.45-13.15 Panels13.15-14.15 Lunch Cloisters, Highfields)14.15-15.45 Panels15.45-16.15 Thanks and prizegiving (Highfields, A1)

28