online (gnam) and offline (express stream and tier0) monitoring produced results during...

6
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring histograms At low level (raw and prep-raw data), mid level (cluster) and high level (track ) Online monitoring was a useful tool for CSC integration Integrated, maintained, and validated with ATLAS software CSC reconstruction software validated (Sep 2009) CSC reconstruction and monitoring enabled at Tier0 (since Oct 2009) In mid-December all offline muon detector monitoring was off – problems and solution still unclear Developed associated configuration (DQMF / OHP for online) DQMF/ HAN for offline) for web display Algorithms to extract information from histograms for DB storage Calculation and DB storage of online and offline DQ flags tested (Nov-Dec 2009) Provided documentation on ATLAS and ATLAS Operations twiki’s CSC DQA Status 1

Upload: toby-chapman

Post on 29-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009)Shifter and expert level monitoring histogramsAt low level (raw and prep-raw data), mid level (cluster) and high

level (track )Online monitoring was a useful tool for CSC integration

Integrated, maintained, and validated with ATLAS softwareCSC reconstruction software validated (Sep 2009) CSC reconstruction and monitoring enabled at Tier0 (since Oct 2009)In mid-December all offline muon detector monitoring was off –

problems and solution still unclear Developed associated configuration (DQMF / OHP for online)

DQMF/ HAN for offline) for web displayAlgorithms to extract information from histograms for DB storage

Calculation and DB storage of online and offline DQ flags tested (Nov-Dec 2009)

Provided documentation on ATLAS and ATLAS Operations twiki’s

CSC DQA Status

1

Page 2: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

CSC Online DQA Results

Run 125032Layer maps

Run 125032Sampling time

Run 125032 Status flags

2

• Overall DQ flags extracted for two DQ regions: CSCEA and CSCEC

• SHIFTONL flags are propagated to database

• Shifter documentation at P1 up-to-date

• Check list for shifters provided

Page 3: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

CSC Offline DQA Results

3

o Overall DQ regions CSC[EA/EC]o Algorithms to identify

o dead/noisy layerso outliers

o DQ Flags are stored in offline DBo Documentation provided

o For Tier0 shifter ando Muon Offline DQ experts

Page 4: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

DCS Data Quality

4

• HV for each layer• LV for chamber• L1 (Ar) and L2 (CO2 ) Ratio • DCS calculator: overall DCS DQ flags

Page 5: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

Summary

5

All aspects of CSC Data Quality functional Tested at P1/Tier0 during cosmic /collision runs Work in progress on how to best use the DQ

info in reconstruction Need more shift experience in combined runs Modify/ improve and maintain software, shifter

histograms, documentation on regular basis (as we gain experience)

Page 6: Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring

To Do

6

There are two areas where we need improvement

Online monitoring using the calibration stream Perhaps there is a gain in statistics over the current

GNAM monitoring Software for calibration stream exists but needs to be

tested and integrated at Point 1 Monitoring / rootuple production at the calibration

centers For CSC, these are useful for reconstruction studies

rather than calibration Again, some software for monitoring and rootuple

production exists but needs to be tested and the loop closed

Manpower / priority a problem with this item