open metrics for open repositories at or2012

20
Open Metrics for Open Repositories 20x20 Pecha Kucha delivered at OR2012 on Tuesday 10 th July based on the unpublished paper available from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/30226/ Brian Kelly 1 , Nick Sheppard 2 , Jenny Delasalle 3 , Mark Dewey 1 , Owen Stephens 4 , Gareth J Johnson 5 and Stephanie Taylor 1 1 UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, UK {B.Kelly, M.Dewey, S.Taylor}@ukoln.ac.uk 2 UKCoRR/Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK {[email protected] } 3 University of Warwick, Warwick, UK {[email protected] } 4 Consultant, UK {[email protected] } 5 UKCoRR/University of Leicester, Leicester, UK {[email protected] }

Upload: nick-sheppard

Post on 06-May-2015

15.973 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Slides for a paper on "Open Metrics for Open Repositories" based on the paper available from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/30226/ and presented by Nick Sheppard at the Seventh International Conference on Open Repositories (OR2012) held in Edinburgh from 9-13th July 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Open Metrics for Open Repositories20x20 Pecha Kucha delivered at OR2012 on Tuesday 10th July based on the

unpublished paper available from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/30226/

Brian Kelly1, Nick Sheppard2, Jenny Delasalle3, Mark Dewey1, Owen Stephens4, Gareth J Johnson5 and Stephanie Taylor1

1 UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, UK {B.Kelly, M.Dewey, S.Taylor}@ukoln.ac.uk2 UKCoRR/Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK {[email protected]}

3 University of Warwick, Warwick, UK {[email protected]} 4 Consultant, UK {[email protected]}

5 UKCoRR/University of Leicester, Leicester, UK {[email protected]}

Page 2: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

OA still in its infancy?

• Need for metrics• Understand how IRs are

being used• Policy decisions• Technical infrastructure• Business data• Not just research• Open Data / OER • Open landscape

Page 3: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

• New, alternative metrics• Use in evaluation and assessment• Exploit opportunities • Usage / bibliographic data • Make openly available• Adoption of altmetrics• The BOAI at 10 – Alma Swan (video)

Page 4: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

The Finch report

• Executive Summary• Gold vs Green• Estimated additional £50-60M• Green has failed!• What does failure look like?• What would success look like?• Evidence

Page 5: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Practice what you preach

• Open it up• Article level (ideal)• Software / fragmentation• Wrangle your software• Need for accurate

aggregation• Technical challenges

Julian Kleyn (2008)http://www.flickr.com/photos/juliankleyn/2604103124/

Page 6: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

The Institutional Picture

• Total number of records• Full-text / metadata only• Raw figure / Proportion of

total • Metadata records accessed• Full-text downloaded• How records are accessed– Search/browse – Search engine referral– Referral from aggregation– Social media referral

Page 7: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012
Page 8: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

EPrints

Page 9: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

• Article level metrics• Open interface• www.eprints.ac.uk/cgi/irstats.cgi• Use as advocacy tool

Page 10: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Dspace(GA plug-in)

• More reliable than existing DS plugins

• lost stats/inflated page views from robots

• Stats available at three levels: – item, – collection – repository

http://ukcorr.org/2012/03/22/using-google-analytics-statistics-within-dspace-2/https://github.com/seesmith/Dspace-googleanalytics

Page 12: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Number of Full Text• Few IRs can easily provide data• RepUK (national aggregation service)• CORE• Discrepancies• Proportion as measure?• Full text only exemplars (19)• Developing Research Management

Infrastructure• CRIS

Brunel, City University London, Cranfield, Loughborough, QMUL, RHUL, School of Advanced Study, Aberdeen, Birmingham, Cambridge, East London, Edinburgh, Exeter, Hull, St Andrews, Stirling, Surrey, Warwick, Nottingham

(Should be HTML?)

Page 14: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

• Technical challenges• OpenDoar• OAI-PMH• Data visualisation• Trends revealed

DepositsOai_dc node occurencesOai_dc node occurences over timeOai_dc percentabe node occurences over timeMetadata quality – validity of XML and DRIVER compliancedc:subject classification system occurrencedc:language occurrence across UK repositoriesMatches against IANA Mime Types

Page 15: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

(Edinburgh Research Archive)

154 IRs aggregated (28/06/12)• 397790 PDF • 20578 MS Word• 44018 jpeg • 122764 html

Page 16: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012
Page 17: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

The Researchers’ Requirements

• May have effect on deposit choice• PLoS/Arxiv display article-level metrics• Numbers aggregated (locations / versions)• PLoS show visitor numbers from PMC• May not deposit in IR to maximise numbers

at preferred location• Few publishers display article-level metrics• Opportunity for IRs to engage with authors• Measuring impact (REF, RCUK)• altmetrics

Page 18: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Third Party Services

• Mechanisms to harvest metadata/full-text • OAI-PMH• The search party didn’t turn up?• Slow growth• Google (Scholar)• CiteSeerX, CORE cache copies • Affects repository metrics• PIRUS2 / article level metrics

Page 19: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

COnnecting REpositories (CORE)

• Repository Analytics• Increase the visibility of content• Provide applications to aid

content discovery• Enrich metadata

Page 20: Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012

Conclusions

• Yes it’s complicated!• Stats don’t tell the

whole picture• Greatest value for

operational / strategic purposes

• Senior management• IR managers should be

proactive• Culture of openness