Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic ?· Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic perspective…

Download Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic ?· Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic perspective…

Post on 16-Sep-2018




0 download

Embed Size (px)


  • 38

    Copyright 2011, IPM, INDIA

    Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic perspective

    Deepika Satyarajan, Vishwesh Akre

    Manipal University Dubai,

    ABSTRACT : Open Source Software (OSS) is defined as a computersoftware that is freely provided and which permits users to use,change, and improve the software, and to redistribute it in a modifiedor an unmodified forms. OSS is developed in a highly social onlineenvironment where developers are dispersed in space and time, butrarely interact in a face-to-face manner. Literature in this fieldspecifies many successful OSS implementations in AcademicInstitutions globally. Educational Institutions have diverse opinionon the academic use of OSS. The concept of open access and theproliferation of academic blogs have broken down many barriersin the educational sector. With the reference of studies conductedin various countries such as Switzerland, USA, Australia, UK etc.,it can be said that there are two distinct views on the academicacceptance of OSS. One view is in favor of the use of OSS, while theother is hesitant about OSS thinking that it could suppress thecreativity of individuals. OSS represents a social dimension ofLearning through a Persistent, Unified, Massively Multi-User, andSelf-Organizing Virtual Environment extending beyond thetraditional classroom into the universities common areas wherelearners build knowledge and understanding through serendipitousand collaborative exchanges both within and across subject areaboundaries. The digitization of education is a relatively newphenomenon but has already transformed the education sector.Most Educational Institutions are operated on a non-profit basisand many of them are government funded. Open Source Softwaresare freely available on well-known OSS Project communityproviders such as and hence can beimplemented in Educational Institutions at no procurement costs.This research is an attempt to examine the differences between theimplementation of OSS and Proprietary softwares in EducationalInstitutions. Findings of this study could facilitate Universities andEducational Institutions to evaluate the options of using OSS fortheir Information Technology or Information Systems requirements.KEYWORDSOSS - Open Source Software, OSI - Open Source Initiative


    OSS is software delivered with its source code and is anoutcome of the convergence of Information andCommunication Technologies (ICTs). OSS allows users tohave access to the source code of the software, the freedomto use the software to create derived works and redistributethe derivative software for free or at a charge [19]. OpenSource Software communities such as playa vital role in providing the platform for the creation,modification, maintenance, support and distribution of OSS[20].

    OSS development process was initiated by theestablishment of - Open Source Initiative (OSI), a non-profitcorporation formed to educate about and advocate for thebenefits of open source and to build bridges among differentconstituencies in the open-source community [1]. OSIsmain activity consists of creation of OSI Approved Licensetrademark so as to create nexus of trust around whichdevelopers, users, institutions and governments canconsolidate open-source cooperation. The OSI activelypromotes OSS by educating developers, decision makers,and users about its advantages and benefits. Its boardmembers are active in the core open source developmentcommunities as well as in academic, government, andindustry circles [1].


    Academic Institutions have always used software forclassroom teaching, lab room teaching, library managementand other academic administration domains. VariousSoftware Manufacturers have designed creative softwareproducts to be used in different functional realms ofEducational Intuitions.

    As part of the OSIs mandate on education, board memberspresent about open source technologies, collaboration andcommunity at conferences and seminars across the world.OSIs Education Committee focuses on the use andteaching of OSS in the educational context, from earliestchildhood instruction up through graduate and post-graduate levels. The Education Committee is responsiblefor developing, arranging, and conducting educationalconferences, programs, courses of instruction, and onlineeducational seminars covering open source software,licensing, and communities. Many researches have beendone on OSS. It is very popular in other Western countriesand has also been implemented in various EducationalInstitutions in the West [13]. OSS has proved to be a very good option for EducationalInstitutions as they help to create new innovative ideas ofbut the faculties as well as the students which enhance thelearning ability and a new interesting and interactiveapproach to both teaching and learning [1]. The use of

    Special Issue of IJCCT, ISSN (ONLINE): 2231 0371, ISSN (PRINT): 0975 7449,Volume- 3, Issue-1, 2013

  • 39

    Copyright 2011, IPM, INDIA

    OSS in Academic institutions would be beneficial to thestudents as some of these softwares are linked toprofessional certifications (e.g.: Red Hat, Linux, Sun Java)and can add value for them in the job market. OSS not onlywould provide a new dimension to learning but alsoencourages students to participate in knowledge creationand enhancement activities, and sharing the findingsthrough the public Internet. It improves interaction betweenstudents and teachers and develops individual skills on thewhole. Students can learn new OSS softwares as their codesare available. By studying the codes, the students can getknowledge about various development methodologies,complex logics and other programming techniques. Facultiescan utilize OSS by interacting with students in a moreefficient and effective way. Teachers can conduct lecturesonline, post lecture notes, assignments, tutorials, Projectsetc. by making use of OSS softwares such as Moodle[21,22] and OpenMeetings [21, 22]. Most of the EducationalIntuitions are non-profit organizations. Hence the use ofOSS would be preferred in Educational Intuitions as lessexpenditure is incurred in procuring the OSS. This shouldindicate that the adoption of OSS in Educational Intuitionswill increase in the days ahead. But the fact remains thatmost of the Educational Intuitions are still relying onTraditional or Proprietary Softwares.


    Proprietary software is a software program that is offeredfor sale and comes with a license that provides the suppliercontrol over the source code. The supplier holds ownershipor intellectual property rights over the software and restrictsmodifications and the distribution of the source code.Academic software has become increasingly important foruniversities, since it automates a growing range of individualand institutional activities. It is important that such softwarereflects both - the procedures and the business models ofacademia. Commercial or proprietary software raise at leasttwo intertwined problems as follows: Expenditure of software, costs which are hard to calculate

    and even more difficult to cover. Lack of technical transparency combined with strong

    dependency on the product in use.Private institutions often have heavily promoted proprietarydata formats to make users dependent on their products.This has proven to be a big handicap for higher EducationalIntuitions that rely on the cross-institutional exchange ofscholarly publications, course materials and the relatedmeta-data. In the meantime, several companies have reactedto the respective complaints of higher Educational Intuitionsand started to increase the interoperability of their products.

    Consumers still depend on the vendors, since theknowledge about proprietary software and formats isnormally a well-protected secret [17]. Some commonly usedproprietary softwares in academic sector are MicrosoftOffice, Blackboard etc.


    OSS can prove to be a boon to Educational Intuitions, byproviding solutions to some of the problems faced by usingthe traditional softwares. The open source idea is thusincreasingly becoming popular in higher education. Thekey characteristic of open source products lies in the factthat their source code is made public and freely accessible.

    Openness of the source code is a prerequisite for theopportunity to publicly test, vary and improve software.This procedure is very similar to the scientific method ofknowledge production, where all essential steps(hypothesis, method of observation, results) have to bemade transparent and open for critique. Open sourcesoftware is published and discussed in specializedcommunities. These documented debates are an efficienttool to safeguard and raise quality. In the long run, theyalso can lead to the development of open standards, whichin return can guide future software developments. Opensource products can become public domain withoutnecessarily being for free [17]. Some common OSS used inEducational Intuitions are Open Office, GIMP, Moodle etc.


    Literature review on OSS was carried out to study the OpenSource Methodology and the various OSS and Proprietarysoftwares used in Academic Institutions. Over 20 researcharticles from journals and conferences were studied toexplore the research done in the field of OSS, worldwide.Comparative analysis was done between features of OSSand Proprietary Software. The features were rated on threelevels Low, Moderate and High. Low rating indicates thatthe features were present in the software but at a verybasic level. Moderate rating indicated that the features werepresent and had above average functionality. High ratingwas used only for exceptional functionality of features. Onbasis of the analysis, discussions were carried out by theauthors and important conclusions were formulated.


    Koha is the first open-source Integrated Library System(ILS). Its development is steered by a growing community

    Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic perspective

    Special Issue of IJCCT, ISSN (ONLINE): 2231 0371, ISSN (PRINT): 0975 7449,Volume- 3, Issue-1, 2013

  • 40

    Copyright 2011, IPM, INDIA

    of libraries collaborating to achieve their technologygoals. It includes modules for circulation, cataloguing,acquisitions, serials, reserves, patron management, branchrelationships and a lot more [14]. Test Case Web (TCW) isan online Test Case Management System built with PHPand a SQL backend for online examinations. It provides anefficient means for generation, organization, and executionreporting of test cases among projects and by multipletesters and versions. It provides basic reporting capabilitiesand per-project access control [18]. Kuali is a collaborativeapproach to design, an open development platform, and aweb-based operating environment having a modulararchitecture for the administration [26]. 20-plus universitieshave joined the Kuali Foundation, a nonprofit organizationdriving open source ERP forward. Bigname Kuali backersinclude Cornell University (NY), Carnegie Mellon University(PA), the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, andIndiana University [27].

    Dim Dim [23. 24] is the worlds first free web meeting servicebased on the open source platform for virtual classroomsand can be integrated with the e-learningplatforms Moodle, Claroline and Docebo. It also allowsusers to hold web meetings, customize and brand thesemeetings [23]. R.G. College Administration Software is thelatest proposed software system from R.G. Software &Systems. It enables optimum utilization and enhancementof overall functioning of a college and integrates thefunctional and procedural requirements of a modern dayuniversity system onto a common platform. Officeadministrative affairs, student processes, examinations,resource planning are some of the subcomponents of thissoftware [15]. Blackboard is a Web-based tool that isbecoming an important and popular course managementsoftware application in higher education [25]. It provides anumber of learning tools, including an online discussionboard, course content management, a course calendar,information announcement, electronic mail, reviews, auto-marked quizzes and exams, navigation tools, access control,grade maintenance and distribution, student progresstracking, etc. [25].

    Library for Universal (L4U) is a classic system for librarymanagement that uses data exported from StudentManagement Application and personnel database, after aprevious filtering and transformation by a specially designedprogram [27]. Since 1986, L4U has been working withLibrarians and Technicians from school libraries, publiclibraries, media management centers and special libraries tohelp improve access to resources, serials and textbookmanagement [28]. Exam Software is a Test ManagementSoftware to create and conduct computer based online

    examination. It is a most powerful user friendly testgenerator, exam generator educational software [29] offers complete solution for onlinetest, computer based test (CBT), quiz, eLearning onlineeducation through their powerful test engine. It is the mostpopular educational software in teachers and professorscommunity [29]. Following tables depict the comparative analysis betweenOSS and proprietary software for following academicpurposes:i) Virtual Classroomsii) Online Examinationsiii) Library Management Systemsiv) Academic Administration and Accounting

    Open source Software ADOPTION: an academic perspective

    TABLE I: Virtual Classrooms

    TABLE II: Academic Administration & Accounting

    TABLE II: Academic Administration & Accounting

    Special Issue of IJCCT, ISSN (ONLINE): 2231 0371, ISSN (PRINT): 0975 7449,Volume- 3, Issue-1, 2013

  • 41

    Copyright 2011, IPM, INDIA

    TABLE III: Online Examinations

    TABLE IV: Library Management Systems


    This research was an attempt to compare the use of OSSand Proprietary software in various domains of academicinstitutions. This research is of exploratory type whereextensive review of existing literature in the field wasconducted and analyzed with respect to objectives of theresearch. The first phase of the study is focused onidentifying proprietary softwares used in academic sectorsand also to study their characteristics. The next and themost important phase were to identify equivalent OSS andcompare their features with those of the softwares studiedin phase one. After comprehensive analysis, the findingswere portrayed in a tabular format so as to give a clearpicture of the comparison of the two types of softwares.The software features were classified into 3 categories Low,Moderate, High. After studying the tables, it can be statedthat the OSS product available for Virtual Classrooms,Academic Administration and Accounting, OnlineExaminations and Library Management System are not onlyequivalent...


View more >