operations strategy for industry: a case study
TRANSCRIPT
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Operations Strategy for Industry:
Case Study about
Friction Materials Company Ltd.
Done by: Ayat Saleh
January, 2016
i
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Abstract
The purpose of this document t is to present a case study about the operations
strategy in Friction Materials Company Ltd. This case study was part of
Operations Strategy for Industry Module in the University of Warwick.
The whole paper is constructed to show the application of Modified Terry Hill’s
Framework with all the tools included as shown below.
(Source: WMG: OPSI Course Note, section 01 (b), p.16)
The document is divided into three parts:
Firstly, the case study itself and the two questions related to it;
Secondly, the analysis for make or buy decision;
Thirdly: a discussion related to the offshore decision.
i
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table of Contents
Abstract ................................................................................................................ i
Case Study: Friction Materials Company Ltd ................................................... 1
1 Friction Materials Company Ltd – Make or Buy Decision ................... 15
1.1 Where is FMC Now: SWOT Analysis and Process Map .......................... 15
1.2 How Did They Get Here: Change Drivers ................................................ 15
1.3 Where Do They Want To Be: Corporate Objectives and Critical Success
Factors ..................................................................................................... 16
1.4 How Are They Going To Get There? ........................................................ 16
1.4.1 What are the marketing strategies: current and new products families .... 17
1.4.2 How does the market view Frictions Company’s products now: Puttick Grid
................................................................................................................. 18
1.4.3 How do the sales over time look like: Product Life Cycle (PLC) ............... 21
1.4.4 Which areas to focus on for improvement (as per customer point of view):
order winners and order qualifiers ............................................................ 22
1.4.5 What are the characteristics of the needed operations: 4V’s ................... 23
1.4.6 What are the company's objectives: five performance objectives ............ 24
1.4.7 What is the next step? Vertical integration or outsourcing ........................ 25
1.4.8 Make or buy decision? Abbetti Matrix and Venkatesan's Flowchart ......... 25
1.4.9 What kind of relationships they should have with suppliers? .................... 28
1.4.10 How much is enough? Capacity management ......................................... 30
1.4.11 What manufacturing processes they will need? Process type and layout
design ....................................................................................................... 35
1.4.12 What are the advantages and limitations of each selected option? Trade-
offs/ productivity ....................................................................................... 38
1.4.13 What process technology and Information Technology? .......................... 38
1.4.14 What production planning and control system is needed? ....................... 41
1.4.15 What quality management system is needed? ......................................... 41
1.4.16 What are the needed HR processes? ...................................................... 42
1.4.17 What are the needed changes to the organization? Organizational
structure ................................................................................................... 43
1.4.18 How do they perform product and process development? ....................... 46
1.4.19 How will they allocate resources and budgeting? ..................................... 48
ii
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.20 How do they measure and review their performance? Balanced Scorecard
................................................................................................................. 48
1.5 Conclusion: The Future Lies in Their Hands ............................................ 50
2 Friction Materials Company Ltd – Offshore Decision ......................... 51
2.1 Do They Need New Marketing Strategies? .............................................. 52
2.2 The Offshoring Decision ........................................................................... 53
2.2.1 Hofstede's cultural score .......................................................................... 53
2.2.2 Total Cost of Ownership ........................................................................... 55
2.3 Make or Buy the OE Product Range? ...................................................... 57
2.4 Conclusion................................................................................................ 58
3 References .............................................................................................. 59
4 Appendices ............................................................................................. 61
A. SWOT Analysis for Friction Materials Company ....................................... 62
B. Process Map for Friction Materials Company ........................................... 63
C. Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score ........................................................... 64
D. Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection ............................... 71
iii
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Change Drivers .................................................................................. 16
Figure 1.2 Objectives and CSFs ......................................................................... 16
Figure 1.3 Venn Diagram for The Three Markets................................................ 17
Figure 1.4 Puttick Matrix for FMC ....................................................................... 18
Figure 1.5 Product Life Cycle for the Three Products ......................................... 21
Figure 1.6 Four V’s for the Three Products ......................................................... 24
Figure 1.7 Polar Diagram for the Three Products ............................................... 25
Figure 1.8 Abbetti Matrix ..................................................................................... 27
Figure 1.9 Venkatesan’s Flowchart ..................................................................... 27
Figure 1.10 Kraljic’s Matrix .................................................................................. 28
Figure 1.11 Power in The Supply Chain ............................................................. 29
Figure 1.12 The Supplier Preference Matrix- Back Plates .................................. 29
Figure 1.13 Mixed Plan Capacity Adjustment ..................................................... 30
Figure 1.14 P to D Ratios .................................................................................... 31
Figure 1.15 Capacity Planning and Control ........................................................ 34
Figure 1.16 Manufacturing Processes for the Three Products ............................ 35
Figure 1.17 Manufacturing Layout for the Three Products .................................. 36
Figure 1.18 Current Process Layout for Specialized and Aftermarket Products . 37
Figure 1.19 Process Technology and Information Technology ........................... 38
Figure 1.20 Proposed Plant's Layout .................................................................. 39
Figure 1.21 Proposed Plant's Detailed Layout .................................................... 39
Figure 1.22 Trade-offs/ Productivity for the Selected Manufacturing Processes . 40
Figure 1.23 Quality Management System ........................................................... 42
Figure 1.24 Organizational Structure .................................................................. 45
Figure 1.25 Critical Success Factors and Metrics for NPD ................................. 46
Figure 1.26 NDP Process in Friction Materials Company ................................... 47
Figure 1.27 Resources Allocation and Budgeting ............................................... 48
Figure 1.28 Balanced Scorecard......................................................................... 49
Figure 1.29 Objectives and Critical Success Factors .......................................... 50
Figure 2.1 Top Ten Sub-Factors in Location Selection ....................................... 51
Figure 2.2 Polar Diagram for the New OE Long-Term Contract ......................... 52
Figure 2.3 Hofstede`s Score for the Three Countries ......................................... 55
Figure 2.4 Indices for Total Cost of Ownership ................................................... 56
iv
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 2.4 Abetti’s Matrix for OE Product Range ................................................ 58
Figure 2.5 Venkatesan’s Flowchart for OE Product Range ................................. 58
Figure B.1 Process Map for the Production Process in Friction Materials
Company ............................................................................................................ 63
Figure C.1 Hofstede`s Score for the Three Countries ......................................... 64
v
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Differences Between Three Products According to Puttick Grid ......... 20
Table 1.2 Order Winners and Order Qualifiers ................................................... 23
Table 1.3 Capacity and Production Planning Limitations and Solutions ............. 32
Table 2.1 Total Cost of Ownership Calculations ................................................. 57
Table A.1 SWOT Analysis for Friction Materials Company ................................. 62
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score ..................................................... 65
Table D.1 Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection ......................... 71
1
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Case Study: Friction Materials Company Ltd
The Company History and Product Ranges
Friction Materials was founded in 1935 by Obadiah Hunt the grandfather of its current
Chief Executive and major shareholder, John Halewood, to manufacture Disc Brake Pads
(DBP) for the growing car market. He focused on the Elite Specialist Market of high end
vehicles, such as Rolls Royce, Bentley and Lagonda. The volumes were very low,
sometimes only 1 or 2 sets a week of any particular type. However, as their success grew
and at the same time so did the market size, they gained more and more customers, and
produced a wider and wider range of products.
In the 1950’s they still specialised in high-end vehicles, and these volumes were still low.
However, the requirements and technical demands became greater as the vehicles
became larger, heavier and faster, and breaking needed to be sharper and more reliable.
Obadiah was very proud of their technical knowledge and flexibility, often boasting that
there wasn’t a vehicle in the country or even the world that they couldn’t stop. This
resulted in two things, they never threw away or deleted a design from their production
range, so that they could always supply a previous customer no matter how old the
vehicle, and also their technical knowledge of blending and mixing materials was
excellent. They were very proud that they never turned away an order. This meant that
they were capable of producing products for a wide range of vintage cars (which were no
longer in standard production). This meant manufacturing either one-off or pairs in very
small numbers e.g. sets of 4 or 8 or even fewer components designed specifically for that
vehicle and supplied direct to the customer or a specialist vintage dealer and repairer. The
order profile was very erratic, with the type required and volume of demand varying
greatly depending on when the components were required, although there was a
seasonal peak during spring and summer as this was when the enthusiasts would start to
prepare their vehicles to take them on the road during the good weather.
Obadiah felt that their market size wasn’t really great enough. The speciality, high-end
markets were good, high margin and technically challenging, but he wanted to exploit their
skills and flexibility in designing and mixing any type of brakepad. At the same time he
didn’t think that they were capable of competing in the very high volume markets of the
mass production companies, and producing these limited ranges would not be playing to
their greatest strengths.
2
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Their Own Brand ‘Stop-Rite’
At that time, almost consumable spare parts were produced and sold through the branded
car manufacturers and were extremely expensive. Obadiah’s son Oliver and his business
partner, Gareth, saw that there was a market for less expensive, yet still capable, DBP,
which would serve the ‘Atermarket’ (spare or replacement parts for models still in
production but replacing worn out components when cars was serviced by an
independent garage or the owners themselves). Thus they started their own brand called
‘Stop-Rite’. This was a move away from the very small numbers involved in supplying the
vintage, specialist market and would now involve production runs of 100-500 sets from a
medium but increasing sized range of components. The demand profile was still variable
as there was no fixed level of requirement as this purely depended on customers’ needs.
There was a higher volume and fewer variants than with the Specialist Market, and again
there was a peak existed in the winter as the weather necessitated that the motorcycles
were fully functioning. The Intended customers were the smaller independent dealers and
repair shops as well as the drivers who carried out their own servicing. These customers
would be supplied via motor vehicle aftermarket parts supply dealers and the small
number of national retail chains specialising in automotive supplies.
Through the 60s, 70’s and 80’s the business has grown steadily and its brand “Stop-Rite”
is now a significant and well-regarded product in the automotive aftermarket parts. It now
produced brakepads for almost every current vehicle in production, and most for those
that had been in production in the last 20 years. This meant that they not only produced
and sold in the UK but also in the major Western European markets. However, they were
still stuck to Obadiah’s original philosophy of being able to stop anything, and never
turning away an order, no matter how small.
The business has grown steadily as the sales of cars increased as many people were
now able to afford a car and wanting to be mobile. In addition sales had further increased
both at home and abroad due the greatly increased popularity of the smaller car.
Following Gareth Woolton’s retirement in 1999, and the loss his father Oliver who was
eaten by a tiger in a tragic accident at Woburn Safari Park in Bedfordshire, John
Halewood took full control of the company and his family own 90% of the shares, the
remainder being held by other senior employees. Other finance is provided by their
bankers in the form of long-term business loans. Turnover had exceeded £20 million
(approx. 2 million sets of pads) for the first time last year (2014) and the business made a
3
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
satisfactory profit, though John was becoming increasingly concerned by competition from
low cost Far Eastern suppliers.
New Markets
With the growth of automotive manufacture in the UK, through the investment of the
Japanese manufactures, the Germans with BMW, and the expansion of Jaguar Land
Rover, the company now has its first opportunity to be considered as an original
equipment (OE) supplier, supplying directly into one of the major manufactures initially in
the UK. Though, initially, this would add 250,000 pads (12.5%) to the production volume,
but there is only one product specification to be produced. Pricing for OE products is very
competitive, and unit prices would be much lower than the existing sales prices for the
Aftermarket. More importantly, success in this new venture will open up opportunities in
the much larger European OE market. John considers that are now in a position to be
able to compete in this market, with the brand name that is trusted in the market and the
industry, and the skills to be able to mix and manufacture brakepads to manufacturer
specification, and were now able to cope with the large volumes involved, even though
the largest batch size that they made at present was still only 1000 sets, and usually the
order of a few 100.
John believed that entry into the OE market will help insulate the company from the
growing Far Eastern competition, and possibly even break into that market as well,
although that would be some years away. However, OE supply will mean tighter
conformance to product specification, meeting exact product standards as specified by
the customer, and consistent performance and improved quality assurance ensuring that
performance is exactly as required, not even at a higher level, just at the standard
specified. It will also require accurate record keeping, to ensure complete traceability of
production batches: raw ingredients, components, manufacturing and delivery. It would
also be important to supply exactly as the customer required as stopping their production
line would result in severe fines.
A batch of several hundred samples will need to be produced to obtain type approval from
the manufacturer. QC procedures and process capability will be audited by the customer’s
own technical experts, before then producing runs of 5000 sets per week, a much greater
volume than the maximum of a 500-1000 that they currently supplied. Winning a contact
with such a manufacturer would be very prestigious for Friction, and would mean a huge
4
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
increase in demand although this should be relatively stable and predictable as initial
forecast volumes would be provisionally ordered up to a year in advance.
Meanwhile the Aftermarket is also doing well, but the distributors are also becoming cost
conscious, however, this is still relative, and the price charged for a spare part to a customer
repairing his car is typically 10x greater than that of the same part supplied to the OEM.
Therefore, because of the cost, rather than reducing the amount that the Distributers are
willing to pay, this has resulted in the Distributors reducing the amount of stock they hold, and
they are demanding that Friction decrease their lead-times and supply the parts rapidly, so
that they in turn can to meet the customers demand for replacement parts the same or next
day.
Organisation
The company organisation is shown overleaf. Nowadays, John mainly concerns himself
with the overall strategic direction of the company and liaison with external financial
providers. Day-to-day operations are managed by a team consisting of the other four
executive directors and Bob Cronton, the Works Manager. If he is available, John chairs
the team though normally his son Tony, the Sales Director, takes on this role. Tony
expects to take over as MD in two or three year’s time when his father semi-retires though
John intends to remain Chairman for the foreseeable future. There are now 49
employees and the company expects to make the jump from small to middle sized
company (>50 employees) during 2006.
Friction Materials Ltd. – Organisation Chart
The Product Mixtures
DBP are apparently simple products consisting of a block of friction material attached to a
mild steel backplate, which connects the DBP to the callipers of the braking system.
However, each braking systems need a different specification of backplate and the friction
material is a complex mixture of ingredients; these include solid and liquid resins, solid
4 Professional
3 Technician
3 QC/Test
Mike Childwall
Technical Director
1 Buyer
Frank Knowsley
Senior Buyer
2 Maintenance 2 Stores
9 Operators
Terry Huyton
Team Leader -Pressing
5 Operators
Leon Allerton
Team Leader - finishing
Bob Cronton
Works Manager
Rainford Singh
Planning Controller
David Whiston
Operations Director
4 Sales
2 Clerical
Tony Halewood
Sales Director
1 IT
1 Accounts
2 Clerical
Eileen Widnes
Company Secretary
John Halewood
Chairman & MD
5
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
and liquid rubbers, Kevlar, copper powder, steel wool, fillers and anti-oxidants. These
form a wide variety of ingredients, none of which naturally bond together easily. Braking
performance for any vehicle is achieved by the use of different ingredients in varying
quantities. Even a small company, such as Friction Materials, uses at least four different
base resins, and a wide variety of ingredients, most of which appear in a wide variety of
formulations. Most base formulations can be used for several different DBP, although
they may need some minor adjustments, and some are uniquely designed for a single
product. However, when the braking material and formed, each is unique to its specific
Braking performance is not simply measured by stopping power, though this is crucial, but
also in terms of squeal (the noise the brake makes when applied and slowing the car),
judder (the vibration or non-smooth stopping of the vehicle) and fade (the loss of stopping
power as the brake wares and ages). Consistency of performance is very important in the
marketplace and this is achieved primarily by consistency of mixing of the friction material
ingredients.
New Product Design and Development
The Technical Director, Mike Childwall, and his team are responsible for developing new
DBP. He explained that the volume of New Product Launches as increasing and now they
they would typically launch 25-50 new brake discs a year, depending on car launches and
manufacturer upgrades. Obviously the Vintage products were all different, and demand
and numbers were unpredictable. For the Specialist Market dimensions are taken from
records if they existed, or more often calculated from a sample of the existing disc using a
range of components and then designed as a bespoke item using their skill and
experience.
He explained that the whole Design Process was complicated, but particularly key was
the development of the resin mix, with the appropriate blend of all the essential
components required, as this gave the brakepad its key properties for stopping the
vehicle, the smoothness with which it did so, and the rate at which the brakepad wore
down. Therefore this was really essential for the success of any product. However , the
Design Team were finding it hard to cope with the increasing volume of NPD that was
being required of them.
For the After-market, the dimensions of the backplate and friction pad are taken from the
equivalent OE component specifications and then modified slightly to avoid patent
6
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
infringement, though all mounting points to fix the plate into place on the wheel, must
remain the same. A suitable friction material is formulated using an amalgam of science,
heuristics and experience, Mike described it as an art of blending based on a science of
understanding materials. However, once a mix had been formulated to meet a set
specification, it was essential that every disc produced to that formula, not just with in
batches, but also between batches was absolutely constant, no matter when it was last
produced. Brake test rigs and a small dynamometer are available for development of new
DBP. Design of new press tooling is carried out by an engineer in the technical
department though all tool manufacture is done by a local specialist firm that has worked
with Friction since the company’s early days. All new ingredients and all materials from
new suppliers are tested by the technical department. This whole process could take
many weeks, especially getting exactly the right amalgam mix to meet the required
breaking performance, and production trials could take some time.
Specialist and Aftermarket DBP do not need the automotive or brake system
manufacturers’ approval but Stop-Rite’s position in the market relies on a quality image
built up over the last 50 years. The threat of legal action in the event of product failure
also ensures that product quality, both in design and manufacture is taken very seriously
by the company. In addition to the standard production of these products over the total
volumes involved across the years, and not just single production runs, means that it is
important, and relatively simple to implement a variety of quality systems and controls on
the factory floor, samples of finished DBP are tested on the rigs and dynamometer in
technical department.
Initially the new OE products would be produced to the specifications already derived by
the motorcycle manufacturer. OE supply will mean tighter conformance to product
specification, meeting exact product standards as specified by the customer, and
consistent performance and improved quality assurance ensuring that performance is
exactly as required, not even at a higher level, just at the standard specified. Later if
Friction were fortunate enough to become a supplier of choice they would be expected to
design DBP that met the manufacturer’s requirements they could use their skills and start
to innovate and develop new lines which could be incorporated in future concepts and
designs.
7
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The Business Process
Customer orders are received by the order processing clerks in sales department and
inputted into the recently purchased AllianceMFG® small business production and control
system. This system is intended to form the backbone of the company’s organisation and
planning and has been installed with terminals in all major departments. Because of the
varying volumes and variety of the products a suitable planning and control system had to
be implemented, that was capable of managing not only the production volumes required
and when, but linking these to operational capacity and the product flow, to ensure
maximum product throughput efficiency. The planning system is updated at the end of
each day and generates new manufacturing orders where needed, based on batch size
and minimum stock level rules held by the system, to ensure that the Raw material Stock,
WIP and finished Good Stock, together with the manufacturing capacity, were all
optimised to enable the company to meet customer orders on time. These rules were
devised by Rainford Singh, the Planning Controller, based on current operating practice
and in agreement with the sales department. The system also calculates new material
requirements and purchasing department can convert these requirements into purchase
orders directly on-screen. However, the system is not web-enabled and purchase orders
are posted or faxed to suppliers, usually as confirmation of a telephone order. Frank
Knowsley, the Senior Buyer, does not consider the lack of web capability a problem:
“It is a step too far, not only for us but for most of our suppliers who are also small
companies. I would much rather deal with a person than a machine.”
Suppliers
Nearly all Friction Material’s suppliers are UK based though some specialist ingredients
are sourced overseas; safety stocks are held of any material where delivery lead time is
more than one week.
The majority of the raw materials are not difficult to acquire, being commodity products,
although some of the speciality resins used to bind the constituents of the brakepads, are
only available from the large scale chemical companies.
The main component that is bought in is the Fine-Blanked Backplate, which are sourced
from two UK suppliers that Friction Materials have used for many years. Friction’s Head of
Purchasing explained that they dual sourced for two reasons: First to mitigate risk and to
8
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
try to ensure business continuity in case of the delivery failure of one of the suppliers, and
Second was to compete one supplier against the other in order to help to try to force down
the price of the backplates. This was considered important because the backplate
represented the most expensive single component of the assembly. However, this was
not always very successful because both suppliers selected, from the broad range of
small to large suppliers available, were very large producers in the market and typically
supplied direct to OEM Automotive manufacturers. As a result, though very reliable in
terms of quality and delivery, the backplate suppliers’ minimum order quantity is 2,000,
much larger than the normal production batch size of 300-500, and even bigger than their
largest batch quantity of 1000. As a small company, Friction Materials has had little
success in persuading suppliers to reduce process or deliver Just-In-Time.
For the Specialist one-off or small quantity DBPs individual bespoke backplates were
machined in house using specialist equipment.
Raw material and finished product stock records are held by the computer system and all
stock movements into and out of the factory are recorded. WIP records are available as
in-process works orders, though the level of progress of a current works order is not
recorded. Little actual use is made, as yet, of the capacity planning features of the
planning system. All transactions are copied each evening into the Sage® accounting
package to update financial ledgers and payroll information.
The Location
The factory and offices are situated on a small industrial estate in Sherborne a small
market town in Dorset in the South-West of England. The reason that the factory is there
is simply because that is where Obadiah was born and grew up, and set up his business
in a barn next to his house. This has proved to be problematic in recent times as this is a
tradition of agricultural area with little skilled automotive labour in the nearby towns. There
is very little unemployment in the area but wages are not high as much of the population
is involved in manual agricultural work. However, wages offered by Friction Materials
need to be high to attract good employees a long way from their normal areas. The
advantage of such a rural location is that there is plenty of space for expansion is
available within the existing building.
Transport links are not good, Dorset is the only county in the country without a motorway
9
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
running through it. Travel by car is OK, but the roads are not good, and there is little public
transport. The town is situated in a rural location making the location not very convenient
for transport of raw materials and components to the factory, nor the finished products to
the customers’ factories. The factory is located about 100-150 miles away from the
nearest automotive factory, which takes 5 hours travel because of the poor roads, and
other automotive factories are at least 2-300 miles away in the Midlands, or even further
in the North of the country.
The Current Manufacturing Process
Factory operations are the responsibility of David Whiston, the Manufacturing Director,
who has recently joined the company from a large international auto-components group.
Though nominally the superior of Bob Cronton, the Works Manager, they will actually
work very much in partnership until Bob’s retirement at the end of 2016. Bob has many
years’ experience at Friction Materials and is very capable of running the current
operation effectively. David’s major task is to bring modern management techniques to
the operation.
“Bob is a good old-fashioned production supervisor and knows all the tricks
needed to make this place work. However, he is not comfortable with change
and, even without the possibility of OE manufacture, there are many things that
need doing here. I am the first qualified and experienced manufacturing engineer
that the company has employed and I am going to be kept very busy!”
The Production Process
The manufacturing process is shown schematically below:
Pressing Team Finishing Team
The production process is the same for all Brake-pads, irrespective of volume or type. The
Specialised and Aftermarket products are manufactured in the same way. The only
difference is the volume.
Mix Press Bake Machine Paint Pack & LabelMix Press Bake Machine Paint Pack & Label
10
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The Pressing Team
The first and possible the most important stage in the process was the mixing of the
binding resin and all the constituents to form the brakepad. Mixing the appropriate blend
of all the essential components required, was quite a complex processes as the
ingredients did not naturally combine easily, and yet an even and consistent mix was
essential because this gave the brakepad its key properties for stopping the vehicle, the
smoothness with which it did so, and the rate at which the brakepad wore down.
To follow the mixing process, the first step to draw the materials from the stores, weigh
out the required quantity for the mix to be made and then add the ingredients in a pre-set
order to the mixer. There may also be a specified rate for addition of some ingredients.
Though the mix formulation tries to work in whole package sizes, this is not always
possible and part packs of unused raw materials are stored in the mixing area; the mixing
operator must remember to use these materials first. There are three mixers; two
produce a batch that will make approx. 1,000 DBP in a cycle time of 1.5 hours and the
third produces a batch for 300 DBP in 1 hour. Finished mixes are stored adjacent to the
presses in drums fitted with lids. To avoid cross-contamination, drums are permanently
dedicated to only one mix formulation. One difficulty is that these mixes have a “shelf life”
of no more than one month because of chemical action between ingredients and one of
Rainford Singh’s tasks is to ensure that all mixes are used up before they become out-of-
date.
The DBP are formed on manually loaded presses with heated platens. The operator
loads the friction material into the die using a specially designed scoop to ensure that the
correct quantity of mix is used. The backplate is positioned and the press operated. The
die remains closed for 30 seconds to allow the pad to partially cure giving an overall cycle
time of 40 seconds. Press changeover time to another product is about 40 minutes.
There are 20 presses, grouped in fours. One operator can work up to three presses
simultaneously with one, and frequently two, presses undergoing set-up. SPC charts are
maintained at each press, though only pad dimension and density are checked. Pressed
DBP are loaded into trays for oven baking to complete the curing process.
The baking cycle is three hours and over 90% of all DBP are cured using one of two
temperature profiles. There are two large ovens, one permanently set at each profile; two
loads per day in each oven normally covers production needs, though an imbalance in
profile requirements or the need to run an uncommon profile may make a third load, on
11
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
overtime, necessary. The start of the curing cycle marks the end of the pressing team’s
process responsibility. All team members are capable of carrying out all the section’s
operations and regular rotation of jobs is practiced, though Terry Huyton, the Team
Leader, tends to operate the mixers; not only is this the most critical operation for
ensuring a quality product but it also allows some time for team leading duties when all
the mixers are running.
The Finishing Team
After unloading from the ovens, the DBP are machined to ensure consistency of the final
physical dimensions of the friction pad. The machining operations are carried out by
machining centres consisting of a pair of interlinked CNC machines with magazine feed;
three pairs of machines are available and they are now running at full capacity with
overtime working often required. Though the machine tools are of a simple standard
design, the magazine feed, machine linkage and tooling were designed and manufactured
by a small specialist company in Coventry. An automated 100% dimensional check is
carried out after machining. Though Friction Materials carried out all routine maintenance
and programming, specialist support is needed from the supplier for major modifications
and new tooling. A new machining centre will cost £165,000.
After machining, the pads are loaded into racks for manual spray painting of the
backplates. As with the Model T Ford, the only colour is black. The DBP air-dry overnight
and are then moved, on the racks, to be packed. Finished pads are manually packed,
four at a time, into one of two sizes of pre-printed boxes. The boxes are purchased in
large batches from a local printing company and supplied flat for assembly when needed.
A pre-printed adhesive label carrying details of the product type (Cars that the DBP will fit)
and production batch number is attached to each box. The batch number allows any
subsequent quality problem to be traced back through the process to raw material
suppliers’ batch numbers if necessary. These labels are produced on a PC and printer in
the packing area using data from the batch documentation. Finished packed goods are
then transferred to finished goods stock.
Whilst the finishing team of six operators can all work flexibly within their area, only Leon
Allerton, the Team Leader, is capable of working in the pressing area.
12
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The Manufacturing Process for Specialist DBPs
The manufacturing process for the Specialist DBPs is exactly the same as for the
Aftermarket, however, the volume is much smaller, and this involves specialist
manufacturing procedures, with the procurement of raw materials in smaller quantities at
higher prices, and either the use of smaller mixing or production equipment, or in some
cases where the cost of dedicated machinery is prohibitively expensive, the sharing of
existing machinery with the Aftermarket production. Ideally fewer more highly skilled
employees are involved in the process, although sometimes the standard workers are
assigned to carry out some part of the process if required.
Production Planning and Scheduling
Though the DBP manufacturing process is fairly simple and straightforward, actually
achieving 100% customer satisfaction without carrying unsupportable levels of stock or
working significant overtime is a more complex problem. As an aftermarket business,
most demand is for “repeaters” with an increasing number of “strangers” as more products
reach the end of their product lifecycle. The Specialist markets are all ‘Strangers’.
Finished product stock levels are calculated based on traditional statistical stock control
principles, but wanting to be able to supply all products the same day, so maintaining a
high level of finished goods stock.
For the Aftermarket Products, the standard manufacturing batch size is 300 pieces, based
on the capacity of the small mixer and is a compromise between set-up time on the
presses and stock level. However, the need to avoid material wastage by allowing mixes
to exceed their shelf life, to use oven capacity effectively and to minimise overtime
working means that Rainford Singh’s weekly production schedule actually changes daily
and, sometimes, even hourly. A scrap rate of 5% is allowed for in the re-order level but a
large problem on a particular batch may mean that a short-term replacement must be
scheduled. Rainford’s summary of the situation is:
“I thought that a more complex Production Control System would make my life
easier but all I actually seem to have is yet another boss. All I seem to be able to
do is keep fire-fighting.”
For the Specialist Products there is no special low volume production equipment
available, and so they simply have to use the smallest volume equipment that is available.
13
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
This naturally leads to delays in the production of the other batches of Aftermarket
Products. Also there can be delays in the production process and the Specialist products
are left waiting for other products with similar baking times etc. If waiting times are too
long the ovens etc. can be used for these products on their own, but this is not the most
efficient means of running the business.
The Way Forward?
Winning an OE contract will have many benefits for the company: it will provide a stable
long term base-load of work for the company and success with the first contract will give
confidence to the company and customers alike when further OE work is sought. On the
other hand, high quality standards will have to be maintained and on-time delivery to meet
the customer’s JIT scheduling is essential. Failure in either of these areas will mean loss
of the contract with serious, and possibly fatal, consequences to the company.
Even without an OE contract, there is need for change; Far Eastern and Eastern
European products are putting prices and margins under pressure. Though the quality
and performance of many of these DBP are poor, the market at the lower end is very
price-sensitive. Large capital investment is one possible solution; presses with automatic
loading/unloading and a 20 second cycle time are available for approx. £175,000. The
set-up time of 2 hours on these machines has made them of little interest in the past but
the may be more suitable for OE production. However, Friction’s policy to date has been
to use second-hand equipment where possible. As John Halewood remarked recently,
only partly in jest:
“One of our competitive advantages is that many of our machines, if not the
tooling, are depreciated to zero!”
14
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Question 1
Using the Modified Hill Framework combined with the Hayes and Wheelwright
Elements given in the OPSI Module formulate and compare and contrast the
manufacturing strategies for the different Specialised, Aftermarket (Spare or
Replacement Parts), and the new proposed OEM market. In doing this, it is
intended that you compare and contrast how the customer requirements and
product characteristics for the ranges vary and so how the strategic operational
decisions that need to made will also differ. Discuss what implications and
problems there might be when trying to manufacture all the ranges with the same
operational strategy or on the same facilities.
Question 2
It is 3 years after the case described above, and Friction has been operating in
the OEM Market very successfully. Sales have grown steadily in both the OEM
and after-sales market, and they are set to grow further. Friction have now been
offered a long-term contract with the OEM manufacturer to supply the same
products at an even greater volume, and with a constant demand, the market has
become highly competitive pressure on costs, and Friction need to be very price
competitive to win and keep the contract. To give them the space to expand, and
meet the new competitive criteria, Friction have decided to take the opportunity to
look for a new production facility in which to produce the OEM Range. This facility
could be located in the UK or Offshored to one of the relatively low cost countries
of Turkey or China. In addition they could decide that the production of the OEM
product could be Outsourced to a local manufacturer. Discuss the issue of
Outsourcing and Offshoring and using the appropriate models concerning
Globalisation, Offshoring and Culture, advise the company on which of the
possible countries this should be done, and then using the appropriate
Outsourcing Models, whether or not Friction should outsource this Product Range
or retain it in house, and build and run their own factory. To illustrate your answer,
you may wish to make further assumptions about the company. This is
permissible but you must state and justify your assumptions and they must be
appropriate to the type of company outlined in the question.
15
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1 Friction Materials Company Ltd – Make or Buy Decision
The purpose of this paper is to formulate new operation strategies for Friction
Materials Company (FMC) using modified Hill Framework combined with the
Hayes and Wheelwright Elements. The new strategies will be revealed
progressively through set of questions generated from the model itself. Each
question will be in a separate section until getting the final one: conclusion.
1.1 Where is FMC Now: SWOT Analysis and Process Map
FMC has a good financial performance where it achieved good turn over last year
and sustained a trusted brand name over decades. Their high technical skills
enabled them to excel in the specialized and aftermarket with wide range of
products.
On the other hand, the company has an old product profile, some bad operations
practices especially underutilizing AllianceMFG® system, limited use of SPC
charts and finally the location of the plant itself which created many logistics
problems.
The company has many opportunities in the new OE market due to the growing
market and competitive prices associated. In addition this will give them new
skills and can help them innovate new products in the future.
The threats that the company is facing are mainly coming from competitors in the
Far-East and from their aftermarket’s distributors to reduce lead time.
The detailed SWOT analysis and process map are available in appendix A and B
respectively.
1.2 How Did They Get Here: Change Drivers
The company was established in 1935 and expanded their product profile due to
different change drivers that are summarized in figure 1.1. Understanding those
drivers is critical in order to develop the right strategies (Slack, Jones and
Johnston, 2013, p.255).
.
16
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.1 Change Drivers
1.3 Where Do They Want To Be: Corporate Objectives and Critical
Success Factors
The company aims at moving from a "traditional manufacturer" into a world class
manufacturer of discs and spare parts. A balance between certain critical
success factors (CSF) and corporate objectives is shown in figure 1.2. Those
factors will be discovered through the rest of this paper.
Figure 1.2 Objectives and CSFs
1.4 How Are They Going To Get There?
The first step in outlining the balance that the company should achieve is
understanding the marketing strategies.
17
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.1 What are the marketing strategies: current and new products families
The company produces two types of products and want to start a third one. The
Venn diagram in figure 1.3 compares and contrasts the three products' families.
Figure 1.3 Venn Diagram for The Three Markets
Although the three products should follow the same manufacturing steps, the
marketing strategies are different due to variations in market uncertainty, product
complexity and product life cycle as will be explored in the next sections.
18
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.2 How does the market view Frictions Company’s products now:
Puttick Grid
Puttick Grid, which classifies the products according market uncertainty and
product complexity, is shown in figure 1.4 (Turner, 2002, p. 132).
Figure 1.4 Puttick Matrix for FMC
Source: Turner, 2002, p. 132
In FMC, market uncertainty is affected by: production volume, product range
and demand profile, while product complexity is affected by firstly, the types of
breaking systems they produce because each breaking system has different
specifications of back plate. Secondly, the high number of components in the bill
of materials (BOM). Finally, the complexity of the mixing process itself which is
done according to different number of formulations. These formulations are
adjusted from one type to another in order to give each breaking system its key
performance characteristics.
Trying to produce the three types of products using the same set of
manufacturing strategies means:
Difficulties in production planning due to the differences in market
uncertainty.
Extensive machines' change over and set ups.
More variation in raw materials.
19
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
FMC can simplify its product range by:
Reducing the types of breaking system they produce and delete the old
profiles.
Provide separate production processes with dedicated equipment for each
one.
Install an automated mixing machines to reduce the human factor in the
mixing process.
Utilize research and development to reduce the number of components in
the BOM and the number of formulations they use. The customer does not
notice the differences in the BOM.
Table 1.1 summarizes those factors and how they affect the way the customers
view the products. Accordingly, Product Life Cycle (PLC), order winners/
qualifiers, organizational skills and competencies and finally manufacturing
processes are different.
20
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table 1.1 Differences Between Three Products According to Puttick Grid
21
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.3 How do the sales over time look like: Product Life Cycle (PLC)
The PLC is used to give a general overview for the customers’ behaviours and
how it affects the operations performance (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p.
78). The different PLC are shown in figure 1.5 so each one need different
management strategies.
Figure 1.5 Product Life Cycle for the Three Products
22
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.4 Which areas to focus on for improvement (as per customer point of
view): order winners and order qualifiers
In order to find the areas that the company should focus on, order winners and
order qualifiers are summarized in table 1.2 (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p.
77). Since specialized products are serving vintage cars under limited number
of competitors, customers are interested a good quality, reliable parts, available
in the store, within the range that they need, and under "Stop Right" brand name.
These are the order qualifiers. If these products are coming with a good lead time
and a good price, that would be the order winners. Finally, volume and innovation
is not important because customers usually request one-off or small number of
sets only.
For aftermarket, the customers have plenty of options, however, they will start
considering this company because of its brand name, consistent performance,
short lead time and product availability in stores. These are the order qualifiers.
As products are more reliable, in a wide range, high volume and lower prices the
customer will buy more so these are the order winners.
Finally, for the OE market, the customer (OEM) will consider FMC if they meet
the required quality and reliability standards, have the product available in stores
at the required lead time, with the required volume and lowest price. These are
the order qualifiers. The more the brand name is important and the more they
work on new innovation, they can win more orders. These are the order winners.
In this market, the product range is less important because the manufacture will
be interested in one product only.
According to this discussion, the three products win orders in different ways in the
market place, therefore different critical competencies and skills are needed as
the following:
Specialized products: time management in order to satisfy the sudden
needs and developing a vision for this low- volume market.
Aftermarket products: time management too in order to serve the short
PLC, in addition to technical skills to cover the wide range of product.
OE products: logistics, manufacturing productivity, and cost control to
serve the OEM at the lowest cost and the shortest delivery time.
23
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table 1.2 Order Winners and Order Qualifiers
1.4.5 What are the characteristics of the needed operations: 4V’s
Different operations are needed to fulfil the requirements of the three product
ranges. The typology of operations in terms of the 4V's is shown in figure 1.6
(Slack, Jones, Johnston, and Betts, 2012, p. 22). The figure implies that:
Volume: OE market has the highest volume (5000 sets a week),
specialized market is the lowest (<10 sets a week) and aftermarket is
between them (500- 1000 sets a week). The manufacturing process for the
OE products would be repeatable, systematic and employees will have the
chance to develop specialized skills. The high volume will allow reducing
the unit cost as well. In contrast, specialized products are less repeated
and require few highly skilled- employees during production process. Unit
price is the most expensive one among the three products.
Variety: specialized products have the highest product variety since it
covers small number of cars, but with very specific needs. Aftermarket has
a higher variety too since it covers number of cars that are running now or
were in the last 20 years. In contrast, OE market will cover one
manufacture only in the first stage. The high variety in specialized and
aftermarket needs flexible product range while OE products will be more of
regular and standardized products.
Variation in demand: OE market comes with the lowest variation in
demand since the demand is almost predicted one year ahead, while the
demand in the specialized market is unpredictable. The demand of
24
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
aftermarket is more predictable than specialized products, however, this
high variation put pressure on the company where they have to keep
changing their capacities in order to meet the customers' demand. In
contrast, OE products can be produced and stored for future demands.
Customer contact: Special market has the highest customers' contact so
higher customer service skills are needed comparing to the OE products
and aftermarket.
The 4V's for each product will be further analyzed in capacity planning and
manufacturing processes' selection.
Figure 1.6 Four V’s for the Three Products
Source: Slack, Jones, Johnston, and Betts, 2012, p. 22
1.4.6 What are the company's objectives: five performance objectives
The current performance and the desired performance for each of the three
product ranges are illustrated using a polar diagram in figure 1.7. Polar diagram
provides an overview for the relative importance of each objective for the product
or the service (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 58 and p. 60). According to
that, the current performance in specialized market and aftermarket should be
improved in terms of quality and volume flexibility. In addition, this performance
will not be enough to compete the OE market. The company should improve its
quality performance even further in terms of fitness to use and reliability, speed
performance in terms of the delivery lead time, dependability performance in
terms of product availability in stores, cost performance in terms of the unit cost
and hence the selling price and finally the volume performance in terms of the
flexibility to produce high volume.
25
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The detailed performance measures will be illustrated in a balanced scorecard in
section 1.4.20 and will be used in formulating the critical success factors needed
to achieve the balance in figure 1.2.
Figure 1.7 Polar Diagram for the Three Products
Source: adapted from Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p.60
1.4.7 What is the next step? Vertical integration or outsourcing
The first structural element of the new operations strategies is configuring the
supply network and considering the vertical integration or outsourcing (Slack,
Jones, and Johnston, 2013, p. 155).
The next sections will answer the question of make or buy for two processes
(mixing and design) and the procurement of one component (back plates).
1.4.8 Make or buy decision? Abbetti Matrix and Venkatesan's Flowchart
In this section, two tools will be used to double check the decisions. Firstly,
Abbetti matrix which plots technology importance to business and technology
competitiveness position (Probert, 1997, p. 23) and secondly, Venkatesan's
flowchart which starts the decision tree by classifying the processes as strategic
subsystems or non-strategic ones until getting to the final decision (Venkatesan,
1992).
26
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The mixing process is a “core” process and very important to the business
because it is the main factor that affect the consistency of the breaking system,
this in turn affects the brand image and trust. Bad mixing can lead to legal
consequences in case of product failures. In addition, the mixing process by itself
gives the product its competitive position because it is done according to pre-set
formulas, which are confidential and part of the companies' intellectual assets.
According to the two tools in figure 1.8 and figure 1.9, the company should keep
this process "in house".
FMC does not make the design process of breaking systems. In case of New
Product development (NPD), the technical team takes the dimensions from
records or existing disc (in the specialized products) or even takes them from the
equivalent OE and modified them to avoid the risk of breaching the patents (in
aftermarket products). The design also will not add a great competitiveness in
case of OE market, because the specs will be provided from the manufacturer.
Having said that, the design capability will allow the company to innovate more
products in the future. According to the tow tools the design capability can open
new opportunities in the future, therefore, it should be "harvested gradually".
The back plates components give “natural” competitiveness to the products,
since the core is in the mixing of friction materials and the back plates just
connects the Disc Brake Pads (DBP) to the callipers of the braking system.
According to the two tools, the company should keep "outsourcing" these
components, even for the specialized products which are currently machined
internally. By doing this, the company should look at the Total Cost of
Ownership to double check that the in house decision will be more cost effective.
27
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.8 Abbetti Matrix
Source: Probert, 1997, p. 23
Figure 1.9 Venkatesan’s Flowchart
Source: Venkatesan, 1992
28
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.9 What kind of relationships they should have with suppliers?
In order to find the current importance of the back plate components, Kraljic’s
matrix, which plots the supply risk and the profit impact, is used (Kraljic, 1983 in
Gelderman and Weele, 2005). According to figure 1.10, the back plate is a
“leverage item” because it has a low supply risk (the suppliers are already in the
UK and there are too many suppliers in the market), but it has a high impact on
their profit (since it is the most expensive component). The company can go for
negotiating a better term with the suppliers (which already did and was not
successful to reduce the minimum order quantity), so now they should seek a
strategic partnership with them.
Figure 1.10 Kraljic’s Matrix
Source: Kraljic, 1983 in Gelderman and Weele, 2005
Utilizing the power matrix that was developed by Cox (2001) in figure 1.11, the
power in this supply chain is within the "supplier dominance".
29
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.11 Power in The Supply Chain
Source: Cox, 2001
The high power for these suppliers lead to form a “nuisance relationship” as
shown in the matrix that was developed by Williams (2010) in figure 1.12. This is
because FMC purchases only small amount comparing to the high capability of
the supplier. As a result, high minimum order quantity was imposed and got large
inventory. By winning the OE market and sourcing from one supplier only, FMC
will be able to increase their purchases and then will have a “core relationship".
Figure 1.12 The Supplier Preference Matrix- Back Plates
Source: Williams, 2010
30
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.10 How much is enough? Capacity management
How much they need to produce?
For OE products, the plant's capacity should be measured as "units per period
of time" where this time period will be according to their agreement with the
OEM and according to the provided forecast. For specialized and aftermarket,
plant's capacity will be measured by "the amount of raw materials" due to the
variability in the demand (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 353).
Currently, the company produces as “make to order” while it has to produce as
“make to forecast” for the OE market. Due to the fixed capacity of the plant
(which is related to the speed of the machines and the maximum can be
produced at each one at a time), they have to use "Mixed Plan" capacity
adjustment strategy.
When do they need to adjust their capacity?
The company will produce OE products according to the provided forecast and
store in the warehouse since there is penalty when failing to meet the required
delivery time. When the demand exceeds their fixed capacity, they should adjust
it by working overtime, dealing with subcontracted employees or using part time
employees (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 338). This plan is shown in
figure 1.13.
Figure 1.13 Mixed Plan Capacity Adjustment
31
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The differences between P to D ratio (production lead time to demand lead time)
is shown in figure 1.14.
Figure 1.14 P to D Ratios
Source: adapted from Slack, Chambers and Johnston (2010, p. 203)
Table 1.3 shows the current capacity issues and problem that affect production
planning and control, and the proposed solutions, and figure 1.15 shows a
summary for the long term, medium term and short term capacity strategies.
32
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table 1.3 Capacity and Production Planning Limitations and Solutions
33
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Next for Table 1.3
34
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.15 Capacity Planning and Control
35
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.11 What manufacturing processes they will need? Process type and
layout design
According to the 4V's discussion in section 1.4.5, the manufacturing processes
for each product type are shown in figure 1.16.
Figure 1.16 Manufacturing Processes for the Three Products
Source: Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 102
The specialized products are placed under "jobbing" process. This implies that
the company should employ highly skilled operators for this type of products. For
the aftermarket, a "batch" process is selected in order to give the needed
flexibility to cover many types of cars with the required higher volume. The OE
products will need "mass" process which will reduce the cost (economies of scale
and low operator skills), provide low WIP (work in progress), and provide fixed
capacity with high throughput efficiency. Time and cost are two of the main order
qualifiers for this type of products (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, pp.103-
104).
The difference in manufacturing processes imposes different layouts as shown in
figure 1.17.
36
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.17 Manufacturing Layout for the Three Products
Source: Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 202
Currently, the company has "process" layout where similar machines are
grouped together (CNC machines are interlinked in cells of two- machines for
example) to increase their utilization. Materials move between machines
according to the flow diagram in figure 1.18 which gives the company the
flexibility to produce the two types of products.
This design will not be sufficient for the OE market, because it provides high WIP,
high lead time and even low capacity utilization (where some machines have
higher cycle time than the others). Therefore, a "product" line is required.
37
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.18 Current Process Layout for Specialized and Aftermarket Products
The company is still need to implement certain actions to get the advantages of
these selections and overcome their limitations as will be shown in the next
section.
38
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.12 What are the advantages and limitations of each selected option?
Trade-offs/ productivity
According to the selected process types, process layouts and the capacity
planning in section 1.4.10, the suggested plant's layout and the detailed one are
shown in figure 1.20 and 1.21 respectively.
Each of the selected choices has its advantages and limitations so different
actions should be taken as illustrated in figure 1.22.
1.4.13 What process technology and Information Technology?
As discussed in the capacity planning and control, figures 1.19 summarizes the
needed process technology and information technology.
Figure 1.19 Process Technology and Information Technology
39
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.20 Proposed Plant's Layout
Figure 1.21 Proposed Plant's Detailed Layout
Operations Strategy for Industry Page 40
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.22 Trade-offs/ Productivity for the Selected Manufacturing Processes
Source: adapted from Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, pp.103-104 and p. 202
41
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.14 What production planning and control system is needed?
The first infrastructural element is having an appropriate production planning and
material control system. The current one, AllianceMFG®, would be enough for
the medium term. Some upgrades are needed to make it web-enabled. Currently,
this is solved by having some manual transactions in procurement department,
however, this will be a major obstacle when dealing with 12.5% extra volume for
the OE market. Additionally, the personnel should use this system more
effectively by tracking the progress of WIP so they can have accurate records all
the time.
In the long term, an ERP II system will be requited because it can provide an
integrated capability and database so they can ensure the required accuracy and
consistency in OE products (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 442).
.
1.4.15 What quality management system is needed?
The company now has a limited use of SPC and inspection practices. The new
OE market requires different quality requirements as illustrated in figure 1.23.
The company should start using more SCP charts to ensure the process
capability in meeting customer requirements. In addition, the maintenance team
should use SMED concept to reduce set up time especially for the press dies.
Starting a TQM journey is very important here to ensure that everyone in the
company is involved in this quality journey and working to meet the customer
requirements (Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p. 548). As a part of this
journey, the company should provide documented procedures for the quality
practices and tests to ensure product treatability.
At this stage, FMC should implement ISO 9001 only if required by the OEM as
part of the contractual agreement.
On the long term, the company can start monitoring Defects per Million
Opportunities and reduced it using Six Sigma Philosophy and hence improving its
productivity.
42
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.23 Quality Management System
1.4.16 What are the needed HR processes?
The company should hire and train the new staff to cope with the new changes
after winning the OE contract. Jobs in mass production are repeated and hence
no need for highly skilled employees. Instead, the highly skilled employees can
be assigned for the other two products. Accordingly, the company is advised to
have a reward and motivation program because the jobs can be boring and
demotivated.
In addition, job rotation that is currently implemented is important because it
increases employees' skills and advance their job enrichment and enlargement in
the future, so they have to keep it on.
A clear communication plan should be prepared to communicate the new
changes to all employees in order to reduce their resistance to change, resolve
any job insecurity concerns and have a smooth transition into the new market
and the new plant's location.
43
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
A tone from the top should be communicate regularly about the new culture
where quality, lead time and cost control are the key important objectives. This
becomes crucial after starting the TQM journey where everyone will take part of
that journey.
A performance monitoring system should be established. Employees should
be rewarded against clear criteria and based on a performance that is linked to
the strategic objectives of the company.
1.4.17 What are the needed changes to the organization? Organizational
structure
The needed changes to the organizational structure are shown in figure 1.24.
44
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Part 1 of 2
45
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Part 2 of 2
Figure 1.24 Organizational Structure
46
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.18 How do they perform product and process development?
According to Abbetti Matrix and Venkatesan's Flowchart in section 1.18, the
design process represent a future opportunity for the company especially when
they win an OE contract where they can innovate new products at later stages.
As a result, NPD is a key success factor.
Bhuiyan suggested a framework to be used in new product development
including the defined critical success factors, metrics, and tools and techniques
for each stage. These are summarized in figure 1.25 (Bhuiyan, 2011)
Figure 1.25 Critical Success Factors and Metrics for NPD
Source: Bhuiyan, 2011
With reference to this framework, figure 1.26 summarized the steps that FMC
should use in future NPD.
47
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.26 NDP Process in Friction Materials Company
48
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.4.19 How will they allocate resources and budgeting?
As discussed in capacity management section, FMC should develop tow
business cases; one for new production line and one for new CNC centre.
Business case should address the resources needed, the benefits and how it is
linked to the organization strategic goals. Figure 1.27 outline how these two
initiatives will support the strategic direction of the company. It is worthy to
mention that no need for a new pressing machine since the separation between
specialized products and aftermarket products will provide enough processing
time for both of them.
Figure 1.27 Resources Allocation and Budgeting
1.4.20 How do they measure and review their performance? Balanced
Scorecard
The company should utilize a balanced scorecrad approach to ensure having
consistetntly an overall picture for the whole performance (Slack, Jones and
Johnston, 2013, p. 648).
The detailed measures under each of the four buckets are illustrated in figure
1.28.
49
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 1.28 Balanced Scorecard
50
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
1.5 Conclusion: The Future Lies in Their Hands
As a conclusion and in response to the change drivers that highlighted in
section1.2, figure 1.29 reveals the CSFs needed to achieve the balance and
answering the question "where do they want to be?"
Figure 1.29 Objectives and Critical Success Factors
51
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
2 Friction Materials Company Ltd – Offshore Decision
Offshoring decision is influenced by multiple factors. MacCarthy & Atthirawong
(2003) outlined 13 factor that affect the selection of the international location, and
then they highlighted the top ten sub-factors that strongly affect this decision.
These 10 factors are presented in figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 Top Ten Sub-Factors in Location Selection
Source: adapted from MacCarthy & Atthirawong (2003)
These factors cannot be well-understood without considering how globalization
brings new challenges in terms of cultural differences. Hofstede, Hofstede, and
Minkov (2010, p.22) summarized the origin of those differences as "identity,
values and institutions". Accordingly, they addressed four key dimensions that
differentiate the national cultures. Later on, they expanded them to include
another two (Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov, 2010, p.31 and p.45). The
dimensions are shown in figure 2.3.
Beside the culture pillar, any purchasing process associated with this offshoring
decision should consider all the costs incorporated; not only the price presented
by the supplier; or what is known as "Total Cost of Ownership" (TCO) (Ellram and
Sifered, 1993).
The analysis in this section will be divided into fourfold: firstly, evaluate if the
company needs new marketing strategies. Secondly, evaluate the offshore
decision in the three countries based on the ten sub-factors, utilizing Hofstede`s
52
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Cultural Score and TCO analysis. Thirdly, evaluate if the new OE products should
be outsourced or not. Finally, draw up a conclusion for the selected decision.
2.1 Do They Need New Marketing Strategies?
According to Puttick grid, the product is still “consumables” and still have the
same PLC. In addition, the order winners and order qualifiers are still the same,
however being commodities means that customer expect low prices now and
even lower in the future. Therefore, the modified polar diagram is shown in figure
2.2.
Figure 2.2 Polar Diagram for the New OE Long-Term Contract
Source: adapted from Slack, Jones and Johnston, 2013, p.60
The operations typology needed for this new contract is still the same and still
have the same 4V's in figure 1.6.
As a result, the company do not need a new marketing strategies and the product
is still with the same order winners and qualifiers except the need to reduce the
costs.
53
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
2.2 The Offshoring Decision
The ten sub-factors in figure 2.1 were analyzed as shown Appendix D. According
to that, China is the most suitable country since it has the largest number of work
force and best quality that can fit in mass manufacturing process. China has the
highest number of transportation modes and telecommunication system. China
also is number one in electricity producer so they have the lowest electricity tariff
and the most reliable source. Following to that, Chinese workers have the lowest
wage rate and the highest motivation.
Government of China has the highest stability in term of lowest external debit,
and Chinese workers entitled with the best industrial relations laws in terms of
union density and collective bargaining coverage. These factors provide stable
business opportunity in China among the other countries.
These factor will allow FMC to produce at the lowest cost, transport at the
shortest time and ensure a consistent and stable business in the future long term
contract.
2.2.1 Hofstede's cultural score
According to Hofstede's' cultural score in figure 2.3, China represents the best
location due to:
1- Power distance index which reflects how individuals act towards the
differences of power between them. China got the highest score which
means that Chinese employees will accept the power from their
supervisors flawlessly thus operations smoothness could be achieved. In
mass production process, the continuity of operations is a priority since
any downtime will cost a lot. The decision maker should aim at reducing
the needles conflicts that may result due to power differences.
2- Individualism index which indicates how much people look at their self-
image as "I" versus "we". China got the lowest score which means that
Chinese nation appreciates the group concept. In mass production
process, team works is not important since employees will be assigned to
individual parts of the process, however the success of FMC depends on
54
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
how much people are working together to reduce the cost and lead time so
they can compete in the marketplace.
3- Masculinity index which indicates how much a society is passionate
about competition and success. UK and China got the same score here.
This index is important to ensure that the employees will have the self-
motivation to lead the company's success.
4- Uncertainty avoidance index which represents how much people believe
that we can control the future. China got the lowest score which means the
employees will be adaptable and will feel comfortable with any ambiguity.
This is important in FMC since the expanding to international location
carries a lot of uncertainty by itself.
5- Long term orientation index which describes the degree to which a
nation maintains a relationship with their own past when planning for
future. China got the highest score which means it is a "very pragmatic
culture" and work continuously to inspire education and science to cope
with the future. This is important for FMC in order to ensure that its
employees appreciate the value of science and will work hard to solve
current problems to achieve long term benefits.
6- Indulgence index which describes how much people can control their
needs and desires. A high score represents "restraint" community and low
score represents "indulgence" one. China got the lowest score among the
other two countries, so it is a "restraint" community which means they are
controlled by laws and usually do not put a lot of emphasis on leisure and
fun. As a result, Chinses employees are hard worker which is important in
mass production process where jobs are repeated and can be boring.
The detailed scores and analysis is shown in Appendix C.
55
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 2.3 Hofstede`s Score for the Three Countries
Source: Hofstede`s Score. Available on the WWW at http://geert-
hofstede.com/united-kingdom.html. [Last accessed 2nd of Jan, 2016]
2.2.2 Total Cost of Ownership
In order to conduct TCO analysis, the three indices in figure 2.4 are used. It is
believed that these are reliable sources of information because:
BCG is a famous consulting firm with high working standards.
OECD, ILO and WBO are international and independent organizations
with clear and published polices on how to collect and analyze such
statistics.
56
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Figure 2.4 Indices for Total Cost of Ownership
Sources
1-
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RMW# , last accessed in 2nd of
Jan, 2016] and International Labour Organization (ILO) report for 2014 [Source:
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---sro-
bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_325219.pdf , last accessed in 2nd of Jan,
2016]
2-
https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/interactive/lean_manufacturing_globali
zation_bcg_global_manufacturing_cost_competitiveness_index/ , last accessed
in 2nd of Jan, 2016].
3-
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/LP.LPI.OVRL.XQ , last accessed in 2nd of Jan,
2016].
57
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
The available data is qualitatively mapped due to the lack of information about
the exact costs in each category. As concluded from the new five performance
objectives in figure 2.2, cost represents the new challenge, so the company
should select the lowest TCO. In table 2.1 below, China has the lowest TCO so it
represents the best location for the new plant.
Table 2.1 Total Cost of Ownership Calculations
2.3 Make or Buy the OE Product Range?
In reference to Abbetti Matrix, this product range is important to the business
because the long term contract ensures stability and profit for the company, in
addition, this product range gives high competitiveness to the company because
being commodity means there are different suppliers in the market, but the OEM
would choose FMC because of this their capabilities specifically in this product
range. Accordingly, OE product range should be manufactured internally.
Utilizing Vankastine flowchart shows that this product range is a core and should
stay at house because it is a strategic one and can open new opportunities for
the company, especially when they utilize their technical skills to develop new
innovative lines that could form a family of products in the future. According to
that, this product range is a core and should "stay at house".
58
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Abbetti Matrix and Vankastine Flowchart are shown in figures 2.4 and 2.5
respectively.
Figure 2.5 Abetti’s Matrix for OE Product Range
Source: Probert, 1997, p. 23
Figure 2.6 Venkatesan’s Flowchart for OE Product Range
Source: Venkatesan, 1992
2.4 Conclusion
In conclusion to the argument in section 2.1 and 2.2, the new internarial site
should be located in China and the ownership should "stay with Friction
Manufacturing Company" as it shouldn't be outsourced.
59
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
3 References
Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development.
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 4 (4), pp. 746 – 770.
Cox, A. (2001). Understanding Buyer and Supplier Power: A Framework for
Procurement and Supply Competence. Journal of Supply Chain
Management. 37 (2), pp. 8 - 15.
Ellram, M. and Siferd, P. (1993). Purchasing: the cornerstone of the total cost of
ownership concept. Journal of Business Logistics. 14 (1), pp. 163 - 184.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. and Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations:
software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival.
3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kraljic, P. (1993). Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. Harvard
Business Review. 61 (5), pp. 109 - 117. In: Gelderman, C. and Weele, A.
(2005). Purchasing Portfolio Models: A Critique and Update. Journal of
Supply Chain Management, 41 (3), pp. 19 - 28.
MacCarthy, L. and Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors affecting location decisions in
international operations: a Delphi study. International Journal of Operations &
Production Management. 23 (7), pp. 794 - 818.
Probert, D. (1997). Developing a make or buy strategy for manufacturing
business. 1st ed. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.
Slack, N., Jones, A. and Johnston, R. (2013). Operations management. 7ed.
Harlow, England: Pearson.
Slack, N., Jones, A., Johnston, B. and Betts, A. (2012). Operations and process
management: principles and practice for strategic impact. 3ed. Harlow:
Pearson.
Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R. (2010). Operations management. 6 ed.
Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Turner, S. (2002). Tools for success: a manager's guide. 1st ed. London:
McGraw-Hill.
Venkatesan, R. (1992). Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make. Harvard
Business Review, 70 (6), p. 98 - 107.
pp. 98-108.
Williams, A. (2010). Natural Section. Supply Management. 15 (3) pp. 20 - 22.
Website: Boston Consulting group (BCG) available on the WWW at:
https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/interactive/lean_manufacturing_glo
60
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
balization_bcg_global_manufacturing_cost_competitiveness_index/ [Last
accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016].
Website: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) available on the WWW at:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uk.html [Last
accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016].
Website: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working
Conditions available on the WWW at
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_doc
ument/ef1444en_0.pdf and
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_doc
ument/ef1409en2.pdf [Last accessed in 10th Jan, 2016].
Website: European Worker Participation Competence Canter (EWPCC) available
on the WWW at: http://www.worker-participation.eu/National-Industrial-
Relations/Countries/United-Kingdom [Last accessed in 10th Jan, 2016].
Website: Hofstede`s Score available on the WWW at http://geert-
hofstede.com/united-kingdom.html. [Last accessed 2nd of Jan, 2016].
Website: International Labour Organization (ILO) available on the WWW at:
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---sro-
bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_325219.pdf [Last Accessed in 2nd of
Jan, 2016].
Website: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
available on the WWW at:
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RMW# [Last accessed in
2nd of Jan, 2016].
Website: The Word Bank available on the WWW at
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/LP.LPI.OVRL.XQ [Last accessed in 2nd
of Jan, 2016].
61
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
4 Appendices
A. SWOT Analysis for Friction Materials Company
B. Process Map for Friction Materials Company
C. Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
D. Ten Sub Factors for International Location Selection
62
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
A. SWOT Analysis for Friction Materials Company
Table A.1 SWOT Analysis for Friction Materials Company
Strength
Marketing: trusted brand name and
capable to cover UK and major Western
European markets.
Finance: good turnover.
People and Organization: excellent
technical skills.
Operations: wide variety of products
even nonstandard ones.
Weaknesses
Marketing: un-updated complex product
profile and accept every order even the small
ones.
Finance: many machines are depreciated to
zero value.
People and Organization: lack of deep
maintenance skills.
Operations: FIFO (First In First Out) is not
followed in the mixing area, limited use for
SPC charts, bottle neck at CNC machines,
AllianceMFG® system is not web-enabled,
and the level of progress of WIP is not
recorded.
Opportunities
Marketing: growing market due to
popularity of small cars and expansion
for more cars' manufacturers in the UK,
pricing for OE products is very
competitive, and OE market represents
12.5%incresae to the current production
volume.
Finance: Pricing for OE products is very
competitive, and unit prices would be
much lower than the existing sales prices
for the Aftermarket.
People and Organization: OE
manufacture can adapt new innovative
products in the future.
Operations: develop new skills in the OE
products.
Threats
Marketing: pressure from Aftermarket
distributors to reduce lead time, technical
demand increases as cars become more
complex, competition from very high volume
markets of the mass production companies
(for the specialized product), and from low
cost far eastern suppliers (for Aftermarket
products).
Finance: high set up cost when moving to
mass production.
People and Organization: mass production
jobs might be boring especially for highly
skilled employees.
Operations: Risk of breaking intellectual
property rights in the Aftermarket product,
large minimum order quantity for the back
plate suppliers, and bad transportation links
to the plant.
63
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
B. Process Map for Friction Materials Company
Figure B.1 Process Map for the Production Process in Friction Materials Company
64
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
C. Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
This section shows the details of the cultural score as extracted from the website.
Figure C.1 Hofstede`s Score for the Three Countries
Source: Hofstede`s Score. Available on the WWW at http://geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom.html. [Last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
65
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"First Dimension: Power Distance
This dimension deals with the fact that
all individuals in societies are not
equal – it expresses the attitude of the
culture towards these inequalities
amongst us. Power Distance is
defined as the extent to which the less
powerful members of institutions and
organisations within a country expect
and accept that power is distributed
unequally."
"At 35 Britain sits in the lower rankings of PDI – i.e. a society that believes that inequalities
amongst people should be minimized. Interestingly is that research shows PD index lower
amongst the higher class in Britain than amongst the working classes. The PDI score at first
seems incongruent with the well-established and historical British class system and its
exposes one of the inherent tensions in the British culture – between the importance of birth
rank on the one hand and a deep seated belief that where you are born should not limit how
far you can travel in life. A sense of fair play drives a belief that people should be treated in
some way as equals."
"At 80 China sits in the higher rankings of PDI – i.e. a society that believes that inequalities
amongst people are acceptable. The subordinate-superior relationship tends to be polarized
and there is no defense against power abuse by superiors. Individuals are influenced by
formal authority and sanctions and are in general optimistic about people’s capacity for
leadership and initiative. People should not have aspirations beyond their rank."
"Turkey scores high on this dimension (score of 66) which means that the following
characterizes the Turkish style: Dependent, hierarchical, superiors often inaccessible and
the ideal boss is a father figure. Power is centralized and managers rely on their bosses and
on rules. Employees expect to be told what to do. Control is expected and attitude towards
managers is formal. Communication is indirect and the information flow is selective. The
same structure can be observed in the family unit, where the father is a kind of patriarch to
whom others submit."
66
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"Second Dimension: Individualism
The fundamental issue addressed by
this dimension is the degree of
interdependence a society maintains
among its members. It has to do with
whether people´s self-image is defined
in terms of “I” or “We”. In Individualist
societies people are supposed to look
after themselves and their direct family
only. In Collectivist societies people
belong to ‘in groups’ that take care of
them in exchange for loyalty"
"At a score of 89 the UK is amongst the highest of the Individualist scores, beaten only by
some of the commonwealth countries it spawned i.e. Australia and the USA. The British are
a highly Individualist and private people. Children are taught from an early age to think for
themselves and to find out what their unique purpose in life is and how they uniquely can
contribute to society. The route to happiness is through personal fulfillment. As the affluence
of Britain has increased throughout the last decade, with wealth also ‘spreading North’, a
much discussed phenomenon is the rise of what has been seen as rampant consumerism
and a strengthening of the ‘ME’ culture."
"At a score of 20 China is a highly collectivist culture where people act in the interests of the
group and not necessarily of themselves. In-group considerations affect hiring and
promotions with closer in-groups (such as family) are getting preferential treatment.
Employee commitment to the organization (but not necessarily to the people in the
organization) is low. Whereas relationships with colleagues are cooperative for in-groups
they are cold or even hostile to out-groups. Personal relationships prevail over task and
company."
"Turkey, with a score of 37 is a collectivistic society. This means that the “We” is important,
people belong to in-groups (families, clans or organisations) who look after each other in
exchange for loyalty. Communication is indirect and the harmony of the group has to be
maintained, open conflicts are avoided. The relationship has a moral base and this always
has priority over task fulfillment. "
67
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"Third Dimension: Masculinity
A high score (Masculine) on this
dimension indicates that the society
will be driven by competition,
achievement and success, with
success being defined by the
winner/best in field – a value system
that starts in school and continues
throughout organisational life.
A low score (Feminine) on the
dimension means that the dominant
values in society are caring for others
and quality of life. A Feminine society
is one where quality of life is the sign
of success and standing out from the
crowd is not admirable. The
fundamental issue here is what
motivates people, wanting to be the
best (Masculine) or liking" what you do
(Feminine).
"At 66, Britain is a Masculine society – highly success oriented and driven. A key point of
confusion for the foreigner lies in the apparent contradiction between the British culture of
modesty and understatement which is at odds with the underlying success driven value
system in the culture. Critical to understanding the British is being able to ‘’read between the
lines’’ What is said is not always what is meant. In comparison to Feminine cultures such as
the Scandinavian countries, people in the UK live in order to work and have a clear
performance ambition".
"At 66 China is a Masculine society –success oriented and driven. The need to ensure
success can be exemplified by the fact that many Chinese will sacrifice family and leisure
priorities to work. Service people (such as hairdressers) will provide services until very late
at night. Leisure time is not so important. The migrated farmer workers will leave their
families behind in faraway places in order to obtain better work and pay in the cities. Another
example is that Chinese students care very much about their exam scores and ranking as
this is the main criteria to achieve success or not".
"Turkey scores 45 and is on the Feminine side of the scale. This means that the softer
aspects of culture such as leveling with others, consensus, sympathy for the underdog are
valued and encouraged. Conflicts are avoided in private and work life and consensus at the
end is important. Leisure time is important for Turks, it is the time when the whole family,
clan and friends come together to enjoy life. Status is shown, but this comes more out of the
high PDI".
68
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"Fourth Dimension: Uncertainty
Avoidance
The dimension Uncertainty Avoidance
has to do with the way that a society
deals with the fact that the future can
never be known: should we try to
control the future or just let it happen?
This ambiguity brings with it anxiety
and different cultures have learnt to
deal with this anxiety in different
ways. The extent to which the
members of a culture feel threatened
by ambiguous or unknown situations
and have created beliefs and
institutions that try to avoid these is
reflected in the score on Uncertainty
Avoidance".
"At 35 the UK has a low score on Uncertainty Avoidance which means that as a nation they
are quite happy to wake up not knowing what the day brings and they are happy to ‘make it
up as they go along’ changing plans as new information comes to light. Planning horizons
will also be shorter. Most importantly the combination of a highly Individualist and curious
nation is a high level of creativity and strong need for innovation. What is different is
attractive! This emerges throughout the society in both its humour, heavy consumerism for
new and innovative products and the fast highly creative industries it thrives in – advertising,
marketing, financial engineering".
"At 30 China has a low score on Uncertainty Avoidance. Truth may be relative though in the
immediate social circles there is concern for Truth with a capital T and rules (but not
necessarily laws) abound. None the less, adherence to laws and rules may be flexible to
suit the actual situation and pragmatism is a fact of life. The Chinese are comfortable with
ambiguity; the Chinese language is full of ambiguous meanings that can be difficult for
Western people to follow. Chinese are adaptable and entrepreneurial. ".
“Turkey scores 85 on this dimension and thus there is a huge need for laws and rules. In
order to minimize anxiety, people make use of a lot of rituals. For foreigners they might
seem religious, with the many references to “Allah”, but often they are just traditional social
patterns, used in specific situations to ease tension”.
69
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"Fifth Dimension: Long Term
Orientation
This dimension describes how every
society has to maintain some links with
its own past while dealing with the
challenges of the present and future,
and societies prioritise these two
existential goals differently. Normative
societies. which score low on this
dimension, for example, prefer to
maintain time-honoured traditions and
norms while viewing societal change
with suspicion. Those with a culture
which scores high, on the other hand,
take a more pragmatic approach: they
encourage thrift and efforts in modern
education as a way to prepare for the
future".
"With an intermediate score of 51 in this dimension, a dominant preference in British culture
cannot be determined".
"China scores 87 in this dimension, which means that it is a very pragmatic culture. In
societies with a pragmatic orientation, people believe that truth depends very much on
situation, context and time. They show an ability to adapt traditions easily to changed
conditions, a strong propensity to save and invest, thriftiness, and perseverance in achieving
results".
"Turkey's intermediate score of 46 is in the middle of the scale so no dominant cultural
prefernce can be inferred".
70
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table C.1 Detailed Hofstede's Cultural Score
Dimension Result
"Sixth Dimension: Indulgence
One challenge that confronts
humanity, now and in the past, is the
degree to which small children are
socialized. Without socialization we do
not become “human”. This dimension
is defined as the extent to which
people try to control their desires and
impulses, based on the way they were
raised. Relatively weak control is
called “Indulgence” and relatively
strong control is called “Restraint”.
Cultures can, therefore, be described
as Indulgent or Restrained".
"A high score of 69 indicates that the British culture is one that is classified as Indulgent.
People in societies classified by a high score in Indulgence generally exhibit a willingness to
realise their impulses and desires with regard to enjoying life and having fun. They possess
a positive attitude and have a tendency towards optimism. In addition, they place a higher
degree of importance on leisure time, act as they please and spend money as they wish".
"China is a restrained society as can be seen in its low score of 24 in this dimension.
Societies with a low score in this dimension have a tendency to cynicism and pessimism.
Also, in contrast to Indulgent societies, Restrained societies do not put much emphasis on
leisure time and control the gratification of their desires. People with this orientation have the
perception that their actions are Restrained by social norms and feel that indulging
themselves is somewhat wrong".
"With an intermediate score of 49, a characteristic corresponding to this dimension cannot
be determined for Turkey".
Source: Hofstede`s Score. Available on the WWW at http://geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom.html. [Last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
71
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
D. Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection
Table D.1 Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection
No. Factor Source of Info and Reference UK China Turkey
1 Quality of labour
force
Hofstede`s Cultural Score is utilized to reflect the employees'
attitudes towards teamwork, power in the organization structure,
flexibility and hard work.
Please refer to see section 2.2.1 where the six
dimensions can be used to represent the quality
of labour in each country.
2 Existence of
modes of
transportation
"Country comparison to the world" index in terms of five
transportation channels according to Central Intelligent Agency is
used. This index can be used to represent the existence of
transportation modes in each country and how good these methods
are [Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/uk.html, last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
Airports: 18
Railway: 17
Roadway: 17
Waterways: 31
Merchant
marine: 22
Airports: 14
Railway: 3
Roadway: 3
Waterways: 1
Merchant
marine: 3
Airports: 58
Railway: 20
Roadway: 18
Waterways:
59
Merchant
marine: 18
3 Quality and
reliability of modes
of transportation
4 Availability of
labour force
"Available labor force" index according to Central Intelligent Agency
[Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/uk.html , last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
32.76 million
(2014 est.)
with 15.2% are
in industry
occupation
804.2 million
(2014 est.)
with are 30.3%
in industry
occupation
28.79 million
(2014 est.)
with 26.2%
are in
industry
occupation
72
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table D.1 Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection
No. Factor Source of Info and Reference UK China Turkey
5 Quality and
reliability of utilities
"Country comparison to the world" index in terms of Electricity
production according to Central Intelligent Agency
[source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/uk.html ,last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016].
Electricity consumption was considered here because it was
suggested in question one that this type of product will be produced
via fully automated production line (which will be fully operated by
electricity).
12 1
21
6 Wage rates "Minimum hourly wage rate" index according to the Organization
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
[Source: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RMW# ,
last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016] and International Labor
Organization report for 2014
[Source: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-
bangkok/---sro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_325219.pdf ,
last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
9 USD (in
2014)
2 USD (in
2014)
5.3 USD (in
2014)
7 Motivation of
workers
Hofstede`s Cultural Score is utilized to reflect the employees'
motivation to success.
Please refer to see section 2.2.1 where the six
dimensions can be used to represent the
motivation of workers in each country.
73
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table D.1 Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection
No. Factor Source of Info and Reference UK China Turkey
8 Telecommunication
systems
"Country comparison to the world" index in terms of three
communications systems according to Central Intelligent Agency is
used. This can be a representation for the quantity and quality of
communication system in each country.
[source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/uk.html , last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
Telephones -
fixed lines: 9
Telephones -
mobile cellular:
20
Internet users:
10
Telephones -
fixed lines: 1
Telephones -
mobile cellular:
1
Internet users:
1
Telephones -
fixed lines: 19
Telephones -
mobile
cellular: 21
Internet
users: 19
9 Record of
government
stability
According to MacCarthy & Atthirawong (2003), government stability
represents "government structure; consistency of government
policy; and attitude of government to inward investment", therefore,
public debt in terms of % of GDP and "comparison to the word in
terms of external debt" index according to Central Intelligent
Agency is used to give an over view for the government stability in
each country.
[Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/uk.html , last accessed in 2nd of Jan, 2016]
88.1% of GDP
(2014 est.) and
rank of 36 in
external debt
14.9% of GDP
(2014 est.) and
rank of 6 in
external debt
35% of GDP
(2014 est.)
and rank of
14 in external
debt
74
@ 2016 AYAT A. SALEH, submitted as a part of the 'Operations Strategy for Industry' course in the University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table D.1 Ten Sub-Factors for International Location Selection
No. Factor Source of Info and Reference UK China Turkey
10 Industrial relations
laws
Industrial relations laws includes multiple perspectives. In this
comparison and due to the lack of information, two factors are
considered; "trade union density which is the percentage of all
employees in dependent employment", and "collective bargaining
coverage which is the percentage of employees covered by
collective agreements". [Source: http://www.worker-
participation.eu/National-Industrial-Relations/Countries/United-
Kingdom ,
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/fiel
d_ef_document/ef1444en_0.pdf , and
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/fiel
d_ef_document/ef1409en2.pdf , last accessed in 10th Jan, 2016]
Trade union
density: 26
Collective
bargaining
coverage: 29
Trade union
density: 34
Collective
bargaining
coverage: 30
Trade union
density: 9.5
Collective
bargaining
coverage: 4.6
Source: adapted from MacCarthy & Atthirawong (2003)