optimization of a dual band slot antenna - dynardo …2 optimization dual band slot antenna ansys...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Example
optiSLang Optimization of a Dual Band Slot Antenna
2
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Problem Definition
• Minimize the return loss at desired frequencies of 2.4 and 5.8 kHz
The minima (positions) of the return loss should match the required frequencies
The amplitudes of both minima should be minimized
• 9 geometry parameters are considered for the design variation
3
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Task Description
• Width and length of the slot (ws, ls)
• Distances of the U-shaped conductors in the ground plane
to the boundary of the slot on x- and y-direction (gap1, gap2)
• Distance of the two conductors in the ground plane to each other (dd)
• Width of the conductors in the ground plane in x- and y-direction (w1, w2)
4
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
• Length and width of the microstrip feed line (lf, wf)
Task Description
5
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
ANSYS Workbench Project
• Open the ready to use Workbench project Dual_Band_Antenna.wbpz
• ANSYS HFSS (High Frequency Structural Solver) is used as solver
6
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Task Description
• Amplitudes at desired frequencies as well as positions and amplitudes of
the two minima are response values
• Input parameters and simulation responses appear in the parameter set
Return loss of initial design
7
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
• Drag a new sensitivity system to the parameter set
• Specify the lower and upper ranges of the geometry parameters
Definition of the Design Variables
8
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Definition of the Optimization Criteria
• Sum of squared differences of calculated and desired frequencies
is used as objective to monitor the deviation in the sensitivity designs
• Constraints are not necessary
9
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH © Dynardo GmbH
Results of the Sensitivity Analysis
• 100 Latin Hypercube Samples are evaluated by the HFSS solver
• Some design frequencies are far away from the desired 2.4 and 5.8 kHz
• After deactivation a positive correlation can be observed in the positions,
furthermore the prognosis quality in the MOP approximations is increased
10
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH © Dynardo GmbH
• Positions are mostly influenced by ws and have high CoP values
• Parameters ws and lf have highest influence on minimum amplitudes
• Due to the low prognosis quality of the amplitudes,
a confident quantification of the parameter influence is not possible
All parameters are considered for the following optimization
Sensitivity Analysis using MOP
11
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Sensitivity Analysis using MOP
• Positions show an almost linear behavior and have large CoP values
12
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Sensitivity Analysis using MOP
• The amplitudes show an strong nonlinear behavior and have low CoP values
Optimization on the MOP might be not successful
Optimization using direct solver calls is applied in the next step
13
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Best Design of Sensitivity Analysis
• The best design of the Latin Hypercube Sampling shows a good
agreement of the positions of the minima with the desired values
14
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Best Design of Sensitivity Analysis
• The positions match much better than the initial design
• Corresponding amplitudes are not improved
Following optimization has to consider positions and amplitudes
in the objective function
15
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
• Two terms are considered in objective function to be minimized
• Sum of squared differences of calculated and desired frequencies
• Maximum value of negative amplitudes at both minima
• Weighting is introduced by scaling the position error by 0.01 GHz
Direct Optimization
16
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Optimization using Direct Solver Calls
• The Adaptive Response Surface Method is suggested as optimizer
17
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Optimization with Adaptive Response Surfaces
• The best design matches the desired frequencies very well and has
significantly improved amplitude values
18
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
Summary of the Optimization Results
• Sensitivity analysis found a design which serves the desired frequencies
• Unimportant parameters could not identified securely due to low CoP
values in the amplitudes values
• Optimization with direct solver calls by weighting the deviation of the
frequencies and the amplitude values could achieve a significant
improvement of the initial design
19
Optimization ● Dual Band Slot Antenna ● ANSYS HFSS
Example optiSLang © Dynardo GmbH
If you have any questions on this tutorial do not hesitate to contact
phone +49 (0) 3643 9008-32