oral bacteria study

12
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov. 2005, p. 57215732 Vol. 43, No. 11 0095-1137/05/$08.00 0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43. 11.5721–5732.2005 Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Dening the Normal Bacterial Flora of the Oral Cavity Jørn A. Aas, 1,2 * Bruce J. Paster, 1,3 Lauren N. Stokes, 1 Ingar Olsen, 2 and Floyd E. Dewhirst 1,3  Department of Molecular Genetics, The Forsyth Institute, 1  and Faculty of Dentistry, 2 University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,  and Department of Oral and Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 3 Received 10 June 2005/Returned for modication 2 August 2005/Accepted 12 August 2005 Mor e than 700 bacteria l species or phy lot ypes , of whi ch over 50% have not been cultivate d, have been detected in the oral cavity. Our purposes were (i) to utilize culture-independent molecular techniques to extend our knowle dge on the bre adt h of bac ter ial dive rsi ty in the healthy huma n ora l cav ity , incl udi ng not -ye t- cultiv ated bacteria species, and (ii) to deter mine the site and subje ct specicity of bacter ial colonizat ion. Nine sites from ve clinically healthy subjects were analyzed. Sites included tongue dorsum, lateral sides of tongue, buccal epithelium, hard palate, soft palate, supragingival plaque of tooth surfaces, subgingival plaque, max- illary anterior vestibule, and tonsils. 16S rRNA genes from sample DNA were amplied, cloned, and trans- formed into Escherichia coli . Sequences of 16S rRNA genes were used to determine species identity or closest relat ives. In 2,589 clones, 141 predominant species were detected, of which over 60% have not been cultiv ated. Thirteen new phylotypes were identied. Species common to all sites belonged to the genera Gemella, Granu-  licatella, Streptococcus, and Veillonella. While some species were subject specic and detected in most sites, other species were site specic. Most sites possessed 20 to 30 different predominant species, and the number of predominant species from all nine sites per individual ranged from 34 to 72. Species typically associated with periodontitis and caries were not detected. There is a distinctive predominant bacterial ora of the healthy oral cavity that is highly diverse and site and subject specic. It is important to fully dene the human microora of the healthy oral cavity before we can understand the role of bacteria in oral disease. The oral cavity is comprised of many surfaces, each coated  with a plethora of bacteria, the proverbial bacterial biolm. Some of these bacteria have been implicated in oral diseases such as caries and periodontitis, which are among the most common bacterial infections in humans. For example, it has been estimated that at least 35% of dentate U.S. adults aged 30 to 90 years have periodontitis (1). In addition, specic oral bacterial species have been implicated in several systemic dis- eases, such as bacterial endocarditis (4), aspiration pneumonia (26), osteomyelitis in children (8), preterm low birth weight (6, 20), and cardiovascular disease (2, 34). Surprisingly, little is known about the microora of the healthy oral cavity. By using culture-independent molecular methods, we previ- ously detected over 500 species or phylotypes in subgingival plaque of healthy subjects and subjects with periodontal dis- eases (21), necrotizing ulcerative periodontitis in human im- munodeciency virus-positive subjects (23), dental plaque in children with rampant caries (3), noma (22), and on the tongue dorsum of subjects with and without halitosis (15). Other in-  vestigators have used similar techniques to determine the bac- terial diversity of saliva (25), subgingival plaque of a subject  with gingivitis (16), and dentoalveolar abscesses (10, 29). Over half of the specie s detected have not yet been cultivated . Data from these studies have implicated specic species or phylo- types in a variety of diseases and oral infections, but still only limite d inf ormati on is available on spe cie s asso cia ted wit h health. Recently, Mager et al. (19) demonstrated signicant differences in the bacterial proles of 40 oral cultivable species on soft and hard tissues in healthy subjects. They also found that the proles of the soft tissues were more similar to each other than those of supragingival and subgingival plaques. Our purposes were as follows: (i) to utilize culture-indepen- dent molecular techniques to extend our knowledge on the breadth of bacterial diversity in the healthy human oral cavity, including not-yet-cultivated phylotypes, and (ii) to determine the site and subject specicity of bacte rial colonizat ion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects. Five subjects, representing both genders, ranging in age from 23 to 55 and with no clinical signs of oral mucosal disease were included in the study. Subjects did not suffer from severe halitosis. The periodontia were healthy in that all periodontal pockets were less than 3 mm deep with no redness or inamma- tion of the gums. Subjects did not have active white spot lesions or caries on the teeth. Our results were consistent with these clinical observations in that species typically found in caries subjects were not detected (3). The subjects had not used antibiotics for the last 6 months. Sample collection. Samples from the following nine sites were analyzed for each subject: dorsum of the tongue, lateral sides of the tongue, buccal fold, hard palate, soft palate, labial gingiva and tonsils of soft tissue surfaces, and supra- gingival and subgingival plaques from tooth surfaces. Microbiological samples of supragingival and subgingival plaque samples were taken with a sterile Gracey curette. Other samples were collected with sterile swab brushes. Sample lysis. Plaque samples were directly suspended in 50 l of 50 mM Tris buf fer (pH 7.6 ), 1 mM EDTA, pH 8, and 0.5% Tween 20. Pro tei nas e K (200 g/ml; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) was added to the mixture. The samples were then heated at 55°C for 2 h. Proteinase K was inactivated by heating at 95°C for 5 min. Detection of species is dependent upon obtaining DNA that can be ampl ied . Thus , a dif cul t-to -lyse bacter ium may not be detected. However, by using our lysis technique, we were able to detect many hard-to-lyse species, such as species of Actinomyces and Streptococcus.  Amplication of 16S rRNA genes by PCR and purication of PCR products. The 16S rRNA genes were amplied under standardized conditions using a universal primer set (forward primer, 5-GAG AGT TTG ATY MTG GCT CAG-3; reverse primer, 5-GAA GGA GGT GWT CCA RCC GCA-3) (21). Primers were synthesized commercially (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA). * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Postbox 1052 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone: (47) 22840343. Fax: (47) 22840305. E-mail: [email protected]. 5721   b  y  o M  a  y 2 1  , 2  0  0  8  j   c .  a  s m .  o r  g D  o w l   o  a  d  e  d f  r  o m  

Upload: deepthi-panyam

Post on 08-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 1/12

Page 2: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 2/12

Page 3: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 3/12

Page 4: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 4/12

Page 5: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 5/12

Page 6: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 6/12

Page 7: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 7/12

Page 8: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 8/12

Page 9: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 9/12

Page 10: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 10/12

Page 11: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 11/12

Page 12: Oral Bacteria Study

8/7/2019 Oral Bacteria Study

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oral-bacteria-study 12/12