ordinary meeting of council agenda - city of ......2012/07/24 · ordinary meeting of council...

ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL

AGENDA

24 JULY 2012

ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL AGENDA 24 JULY 2012

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY .............................................................................. 2

2 DECLARATION OF OPENING ............................................................................................... 2

3 ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................... 2

4 RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE ....................... 3

5 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME ...................................................................................................... 3

6 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE ...................................................................... 7

7 PETITIONS, DEPUTATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS ......................................................... 7

8 DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ............................................................ 7

9 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETING – AS

CIRCULATED ............................................................................................................................ 7

10 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR (WITHOUT DISCUSSION) ................................... 8

11 SIGNIFICANT STRATEGIC MATTERS ............................................................................... 9

12 STRATEGIC & POLICY MATTERS .................................................................................... 10

CC072 CP042 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT POLICY ...................................................... 10

13 OPERATIONAL MATTERS .................................................................................................. 14

TF011 REQUEST BY MIDWEST AERO CLUB (INC) FOR ALTERNATE CLUB

ACCOMMODATION ................................................................................................. 14 OP0001 DELEGATIONS TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER....................................... 18 OP0002 CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON COUNCIL POLICIES....................................... 21 CC073 HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ..................................................................... 25 CC074 203 LESTER AVENUE TENANCY ............................................................................. 28

14 REPORTS TO BE RECEIVED ............................................................................................... 32

15 ELECTED MEMBERS MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN

GIVEN ........................................................................................................................................ 33

16 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN .............. 33

17 URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY PRESIDING MEMBER OR BY DECISION OF

THE MEETING ........................................................................................................................ 33

18 CLOSURE ................................................................................................................................. 33

APPENDIX 1 – ATTACHMENTS AND REPORTS TO BE RECEIVED ..................................... 34


2

CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON

ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, 24 JULY 2012 AT 5.30PM

CHAMBERS, EDWARD ROAD

A G E N D A DISCLAIMER: The Chairman advises that the purpose of this Council Meeting is to discuss and, where possible, make resolutions about items appearing on the agenda. Whilst Council has the power to resolve such items and may in fact, appear to have done so at the meeting, no person should rely on or act on the basis of such decision or on any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or on the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the meeting. Persons should be aware that the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 (Section 5.25(e)) and Council’s Standing Orders Local Laws establish procedures for revocation or recision of a Council decision. No person should rely on the decisions made by Council until formal advice of the Council decision is received by that person. The City of Greater Geraldton expressly disclaims liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on or acting on the basis of any resolution of Council, or any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the Council meeting.

1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

2 DECLARATION OF OPENING 3 ATTENDANCE

Present: Officers: Others: Members of Public: Members of Press: Apologies: Leave of Absence: Mayor I Carpenter Cr G Bylund Cr C Gabelish


3

4 RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE Nil.

5 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Questions provided in writing prior to the meeting or at the meeting will receive a formal response. Sean Hickey, PO Box 2966, GERALDTON Question The proposal acceptance of the “CARDNO Design” by council is of great concern to many residents of Geraldton and beyond. The present situation inclusive of rock walling is of concern, as is the lack of data collection and modelling. Response The City refers the community member to the report of the Office of Appeals Convenor which dealt with this matter during the appeals process (Ground 1, pages 4-8). Question Can council show how it has arrived at promoting and selecting the doubtful CARDNO Model? Response The concept design is based on the outcomes of the Coastal Processes Study, which in turn was a key project in the Coastal Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Programme. The City also refers the community member to the report of the Office of Appeals Convenor which dealt with this matter during the appeals process (Ground 1, pages 4-8). Question How does it employ the principles of ecological sustainable development? What regard has council shown to recommendations by the National Committee on Coastal and Ocean Engineering (NCCOE) of Engineers Australia (EA)? Response In line with the document to which the community member refers (Engineers Australia [2004] Coastal Engineering Guidelines for working with the Australian coast in an ecologically sustainable way) the City is guided by WA State Planning Policy SPP 2.6 which sets the policy context. In addition the Coastal engineers from CARDNO are members of Engineers Australia and are bound to their code of ethics The costal engineers at Cardno refer to the document; Coastal Engineering Guidelines for working with the Australian coast, as it is about good best practice principles, however this document is a guideline, and was written in 2004, so there are documents which override this. Of particular note, is State Coastal Planning Policy - State


4

Planning Policy 2.6 (SPP2.6), which is government legislation, and the Cardno Costal Engineering group refers to this document on all projects, including Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement. The modelling of Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement was based on SPP2.6 Schedule One for sea level rise and coastal erosion. The model met the requirements of Schedule One of SPP2.6 to the satisfaction of the coastal engineers of the Department of Transport. This measured erosion as per the requirements of Schedule One at that time – i.e. using 0.34m for sea level over 100 years. The costal engineers are all members of the Institute of Engineers, and they all have a Professional Engineering Membership. In addition, the project team who worked on Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement have a vast experience of costal planning project, both local and internationally. Barbara Pedersen, who worked extensively on the project was the Manager of WA’s Coastal Planning Branch in Department of Planning & Infrastructure when we developed and government gazetted of the first version of the State Coastal Policy Statement of Planning Policy 2.6 (SPP2.6). In addition she also had input into National Cooperative Approach to Integrated Coastal Zone Management document. Question They suggest in the guidelines (5.2 Ecologically sustainable development) coastal engineers and other practitioners need to recognize, understand and apply wherever practical the precautionary principle (Appendix 3). “This principle requires…. should act in advance of scientific certainty…” “It is also important to recognize and assess the immediate impact of continuing environmental degradation upon the viability of ecosystems, biodiversity, habitats and loss and decline in habitat quality…” Response The full description of the Precautionary Principal contained in the document to which the community member refers is provided below: “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE. States that the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing a measure to prevent degradation of the environment where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage.” Source: Engineers Australia (2004) Coastal Engineering Guidelines for working with the Australian coast in an ecologically sustainable way, Appendix 3, p64. In reference to this precautionary principal the document Engineers Australia make the following statement in Section 5.2 (Ecologically Sustainable Development):


5

“Coastal engineers and other professional practitioners need to recognise, understand and apply, wherever practical, the precautionary principle (see Appendix 3). This principle requires that decision-makers should act in advance of scientific certainty to prevent harm to humans and the environment.” Source: Engineers Australia (2004) Coastal Engineering Guidelines for working with the Australian coast in an ecologically sustainable way, Section 5.2, p14. This project aligns with the precautionary approach identified in the document to which the community member refers. Question Where is the collected data showing the ecological effects of this infill and rock building program? Where is the data showing the effects of the ongoing ‘piece meal’ approach to rock walling at this coastal area? How does the practice affect the sand coastal area? How does the practice affect the sand infill program and at what rates has erosion increased along the coastal shoreline? CARDNO themselves are uncertain as to how this project will play out. Response The City refers the community member to the report of the Office of Appeals Convenor which dealt with this matter during the appeals process (Ground 1, pages 4-8; Ground 2, pages 8-10). Question At the first viewing of the proposed infill and groyne building program I asked why was there a need for the second groyne and the positioning of the possible third and fourth groynes. My question was answered to the effect “the second groyne is to counter the effects of the first built, and that the third and fourth locations are precautionary incase more protection is needed”. Doesn’t council have cause for concern about this approach? Response The statement misquotes the Consultants. The information provided to participants at the community consultation events was that the two headland structures are designed to stabilise the coastline and to provide an effective management point for the sediment deficit present at the Beresford Foreshore. Question Mr Dufour for the council recently stated when asked on ABC radio talk back “that the cause of the erosion is not understood. Just how does a council propose to convince the public that it knows exactly what is going to happen and that it has factored in all the present and future problems?


6

Response The statement misquotes the officer. The City in conjunction with multiple agencies has undertaken studies and investigations into the coastal erosion processes. These are understood. Question Further guideline recommendations suggest “wherever possible coastal engineers should seek to recommend environmentally friendly solutions for their clients needs”. Where are these recommendations to council? What in fact was the brief to CARDNO from council? Will council make the brief available for public viewing? Response The complete statement to which the community member refers is: “This [The Coastal Engineering Guidelines and the Towards Sustainable Engineering Practice (Greene, 1997)] implies, among other things, that wherever possible coastal engineers should seek to recommend “environmentally friendly” solutions for their clients’ needs, consistent with satisfactory performance standards, sustainability and the available resources.” Source: Engineers Australia (2004) Coastal Engineering Guidelines for working with the Australian coast in an ecologically sustainable way, Section 5.2, p14-15. The concept design brief was based on the outcomes from the Worley Parsons Coastal Processes Study where recommendations (based on modeling and community feedback) for coastal protection along the Beresford Foreshore consistent with the statement above were made. The concept design brief for tender was made available on the tenders webpage of the City’s website between 31 March 2011 and 19 April 2011, after which the tender closed. Four opportunities to ask questions about the brief were available to the community member. Council received no questions on notice or for public question time from the community member at the Agenda Forum Meeting of Council held on 12 April 2011, the Ordinary meeting of Council held on 19 April 2011, and the Agenda Forum Meeting of Council held on 17 May 2011. The community member will be aware that he presented questions regarding coastal issues (including the Beresford Foreshore) during public question time at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 24 May 2011, but none of the questions made reference to the concept design brief. With no challenges to the content of the brief the tender for the concept design was subsequently awarded to Cardno at the Ordinary Council meeting of 24 May 2011. Question Amongst checklist items recommended to authorities (councils) are that “low impact engineering alternatives be considered” and “is physical and numerical modeling of the impact of a structure or development


7

required?” Where is this data and does it clarify what CARDNO and council seemingly don’t know themselves? Response The City refers the community member to the previous answer. The City also refers the community member to the report of the Office of Appeals Convenor which dealt with this matter during the appeals process. (Ground 1, p4-8).

6 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Existing Approved Leave

From July From To ( inclusive)

Cr G Bylund 25 April 31 July 2012

Mayor I Carpenter 10 July 22 August 2012

Cr C Gabelish 22 July 29 July 2012

Cr D Brick 29 July 4 August 2012

Cr R Ashplant 31 August 2 October 2012

Cr R Ramage request the leave of absence for the period 20 August to 30 September 2012 inclusive be approved.

7 PETITIONS, DEPUTATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS

8 DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Cr Tarleah Thomas declared a financial proximity interest in – CC073 Heritage Advisory Committee – as she is asking to be added to the committee.

9 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETING – as circulated

RECOMMENDED that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council of the City of Greater Geraldton held on 26 June 2012 as previously circulated, be adopted as a true and correct record of proceedings with an amendment to Item TF005 – Tender – Construction of Stage 1 Geraldton Airport Technology Park to record the tendered amount in the minutes being $5,323,573.88, as it was incorrectly recorded as $520,583,52.


8

10 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR (WITHOUT DISCUSSION)

DATE FUNCTION REPRESENTATIVE

22nd May 2012 Ordinary Meeting of Council All Councillors

24th May 2012

Meeting with Elaine Patterson and Chris Sumner from Ex-Victoria District Hospital Staff Association Inc. Mayor Ian Carpenter

24th May 2012 GHD Geraldton's 25th Anniversary Mayor Ian Carpenter

25th May 2012 Regular Meeting with Hon Brian Ellis MLC and Mr Ian Blayney MLA Mayor Ian Carpenter

25th May 2012 Tour of the St Francis Xavier Cathedral followed by Wine & Cheese in the Crypt Mayor Ian Carpenter

25th May 2012 Closing Function of the 2012 Mid West Art Prize Mayor Ian Carpenter

26th May 2012 Installation of the Right Reverend Gary Neville Nelson Mayor Ian Carpenter

26th May 2012 Business Excellence Awards Mayor Ian Carpenter

30th May 2012 Grants Commission Meeting Mayor Ian Carpenter

31st May 2012 Citizenship Ceremony Mayor Ian Carpenter

31st May 2012 WA Museum Geraldton - Advisory Committee meeting Mayor Ian Carpenter

1st June 2012 Better Beginnings Presentation Mayor Ian Carpenter

5th June 2012 City Facility and Asset Induction Tour – 2. Outer City All Councillors

5th June 2012 Concept Forum All Councillors

6th June 2012 Senator Penny Wright visit, Senator for South Australia Mayor Ian Carpenter

6th June 2012 Private Dinner by RAC with State Opposition Leader Mark McGowan MLA Mayor Ian Carpenter

8th June 2012

Midwest Independent Retirees Meeting - Mayor to give update on City/China Trip and answer questions Mayor Ian Carpenter

12th June 2012 Citizenship Ceremony Mayor Ian Carpenter

12th June 2012 Budget Workshop All Councillors

13th June 2012 Grants Commission Meeting Mayor Ian Carpenter

17th-20th June 2012

National General Assembly Conference 2012 Canberra Mayor Ian Carpenter

20th June 2012 Regional Capitals Australia Meeting Mayor Ian Carpenter

22nd June 2012 Regular Meeting with Hon Brian Ellis MLC and Mr Ian Blayney MLA Mayor Ian Carpenter

26th June 2012 Meeting with Chris Gregory - NBN Mayor Ian Carpenter

26th June 2012 Budget Meeting All Councillors

26th June 2012 Ordinary Meeting of Council All Councillors

28th June 2012 Post Event Regional Capitals Australia Teleconference Mayor Ian Carpenter

2nd July 2012 NAIDOC Mayors Morning Tea Mayor Ian Carpenter

2nd July 2012 Sareceno (Airport Hotel Project) Mayor Ian Carpenter

3rd July 2012 Concept Forum Mayor Ian Carpenter

4th July 2012 NAIDOC Week Bundiyarra Day Mayor Ian Carpenter

4th July 2012 Presentation of Ceremonial Solar Panel in Recognition of the Council's Support Mayor Ian Carpenter

6th July 2012 Better Beginnings Presentation Mayor Ian Carpenter

9th July 2012 Special Meeting of Council to Adopt the Budget All Councillors


9

11 SIGNIFICANT STRATEGIC MATTERS

Nil.


10

12 STRATEGIC & POLICY MATTERS

CC072 CP042 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT POLICY

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-11-06010 AUTHOR: A Selvey, Director of Creative

Communities EXECUTIVE: A Selvey, Director of Creative

Communities DATE OF REPORT: 8 July 2012 FILE REFERENCE: GO/6/0012 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: City of Greater Geraldton ATTACHMENTS: Yes (x2)

SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is seek Council adoption of the CP042 Community Engagement Policy as the basis to ensure community engagement is coordinated and integrated in a consistent manner across the City.

PROPONENT: The proponent is the City of Greater Geraldton. BACKGROUND: Community engagement and consultation is a regular and important part of the City’s regular activity, involving interaction of Council, stakeholders and the local community in a variety of settings and circumstances. The CP042 Community Engagement Policy aims to:

provide a consistent approach across City departments as to how City engages with the local community;

strengthen the partnership between City, government stakeholders, service providers, local organisations and the local community through ongoing community engagement; and

improve knowledge and skills of staff and to improve internal coordination.

The policy has been developed to ensure that meaningful public participation and community engagement activities are coordinated and integrated in a consistent manner across the organisation. It is important that Councillors and staff have a shared and strong understanding of the importance of community engagement and the various levels at which engagement can occur from informing, to consulting and to active participation. Inform One way communication that provides balanced and objective information to assist the community in understanding the problems, alternatives, and/or solutions. Consult A process of obtaining public feedback on predetermined analyses, alternatives or decisions.


11

Participation Participation is achieved by involving the community in a participatory process designed to help identify issues and views to ensure that concerns and aspirations are understood and considered prior to solutions being considered. Participation recognises and acknowledges the importance of working collaboratively with the community and stakeholders to develop an understanding of all issues and interests to work out alternatives and identify preferred solutions. Participation is achieved through a range of deliberative techniques that can encourage or enable participants to take responsibility for their contribution to solutions. Attachment 2 provides a detailed overview of the levels of engagement within the engagement spectrum, how they can occur, examples of engagement at each level, assumptions, risks and risk management measures and resourcing required. Increasing Councillors and staff knowledge about the various levels of engagement and the associated resources and risks will allow better evaluation regarding what level of engagement is needed/possible for each situation. It will also provide clear direction and shared understanding of expectations when staff to engage with the community on a particular issues/projects. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: The community expectation and desire to be able to contribute to decision-making via a robust community engagement process has been a recurring theme in various community engagement exercises. The Community Strategic Plan and Community Charter articulate the community input regarding expectations for good community engagement. COUNCILLOR CONSULTATION: Cr Gabelish and Cr Brick as the Council nominated Community Engagement Champions have been involved in the development of the draft policy. The draft policy principles were a topic of discussion with Councillors at Concept forum on 5 June 2012. STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: There are no statutory implications. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Should Council support the Executive Recommendation, the draft CP042 community engagement policy will be enacted. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial or budget implications.


12

STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Outcomes:

Goal 3:

Opportunities for Creativity

Outcome 3.4: Recognised internationally as a leader in the integration of research, sustainability and community empowerment.

Strategy 3.4.3: Investigate and develop an innovative model for community engagement and empowerment.

Goal 5: Leading the Opportunities

Outcome 5.2: Citizen and stakeholder focused services.

Strategy 5.2.2: Maintain meaningful engagement, consultation and deliberative processes with the community.

Regional Outcomes: There are no regional outcomes. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: There are no economic impacts. Social: A strong commitment to community engagement provides a range of social benefits to the local community including:

Assisting Council in good governance by ensuring community engagement has been carried out effectively and consistently;

Keeping people informed about what is happening;

Development of mutually beneficial relationships;

Empowering people and communities for social change;

Fostering democratic dialogue among citizens;

Enhancing the dignity and well-being of people and communities; and;

Raising awareness of issues, risks, and barriers. Environmental: There are no environmental impacts. Cultural & Heritage: There are no cultural, heritage or indigenous impacts.


13

RELEVANT PRECEDENTS: There are no relevant precedents. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There is no delegated authority. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Simple majority is required. OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to section 3.18 of the Local Government Act (1995) RESOLVES to:

1. DECLINE to adopt the CP042 Community Engagement Policy; 2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by Council Option 3: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to section 3.18 of the Local Government Act (1995) RESOLVES to:

1. DEFER the adoption of the CP042 Community Engagement Policy; 2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by Council CONCLUSION: The Executive Recommendation recognises the need and value for an articulate and consistent approach to best practice community engagement. The proposed CP042 Community Engagement Policy will provide Councillors, staff and our community with a foundation for a shared understanding of community engagement principles and practice. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to section 3.18 of the Local Government Act (1995) RESOLVES to:

1. ADOPT the CP042 Community Engagement Policy.


14

13 OPERATIONAL MATTERS

TF011 REQUEST BY MIDWEST AERO CLUB (INC) FOR ALTERNATE CLUB ACCOMMODATION

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-12-34511 AUTHOR: B Urquhart , Manager Geraldton Airport EXECUTIVE: B Davis, Director Treasury and Finance DATE OF REPORT: 26 June 2012 FILE REFERENCE: PM/6/0006 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: Midwest Aero Club (Inc.) ATTACHMENTS: Yes

SUMMARY: The Midwest Aero Club (Inc) MWAC has made a request to the City to relocate its club rooms to an alternate airport site. The MWAC have requested that the new site be provided by the City. The City has negotiated with (MWAC) through their Club Futures Committee and has offered MWAC the interim use of the building known as the WWII Power House with an agreement in principle to enter into a lease agreement for 240m2 of Airport land for development of a permanent club room.

PROPONENT: The proponent is the Midwest Aero Club (Inc). BACKGROUND: As a result of the introduction of Passenger and Baggage Security screening at Geraldton Airport and growing need for expansion, a new General Aviation Apron is being constructed adjacent to the Airservices Australia (ASA) building. Light aircraft General Aviation (GA) operations are being relocated to the north of the (ASA) building. ASA are in the final process of vacating the building, after which the building will be handed over the City of Greater Geraldton. It is intended that after some renovation the ASA building will become a new GA terminal servicing the new GA apron users and RAAF. The Midwest Aero Club (Inc) currently subleases the majority of the ASA building on a weekly tenure and have requested alternate accommodation be provided by Council for their club activities. Their move will allow development of the site to accommodate safety and security operational needs. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: Council staff have met and corresponded with the MWAC Futures Committee and the Geraldton Airport User Group on this matter since November 2011 prior to the introduction of the second Regular Public Transport (RPT) airline introduction. COUNCILLOR/OFFICER CONSULTATION: Briefing sessions have been held at the Airport with the Mayor and Councillors.


15

STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) – Disposing of Property Section 3.58: (1) In this section –

“dispose” includes to sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of, whether absolutely of not; “property” includes the whole or any part of the interest of a local government in property, but does not include money

Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 gives exemption to dispositions of property to which Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) does not apply. In this regulation a disposition of land is an exempt disposition if: (b) the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not –

(i) the objects of which are charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational, sporting or other like nature; and

(ii) the members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit form the body’s transactions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS: There are no policy implications. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: There are no immediate financial or budget implications relating to the executive recommendation. STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Outcomes Goal 1: Opportunities for Lifestyle

Outcome 1.2: A healthy community through sport, recreation and leisure

Opportunities.

Strategy 1.2.3: Support sustainable sport, recreation and leisure facilities.

Regional Outcomes: The MWAC provides a base for Aviation enthusiasts to join together and encourage flying for recreational purposes with potential to advance into Military or Commercial Aviation. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: There are no economic impacts.


16

Social: The MWAC provides a base for aviation enthusiasts to join together and encourage flying for recreational purposes with potential to advance into military or commercial aviation. Environmental: There are no environmental impacts. Cultural & Heritage: The Executive Recommendation involves the MWAC occupying the WW11 Power House at Geraldton Airport. The building is a recognised heritage building and listed for preservation. There would be no significant modification to the building and the original power generating equipment would be maintained as a historical display. RELEVANT PRECEDENTS: There are no relevant precedents. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There is no specific delegated authority. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Absolute majority is required. OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. ACCEPT the proposal for the MWAC to be given free of fee occupancy of the WW11 Power House at Geraldton Airport for use as their club rooms.

2. REJECT the granting of a leasehold allotment of land for future club facility at a $1 per annum.

3. MAKES the determination based on the following reason: a. to be determined by Council

Option 3: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to

1. DEFER consideration of this matter for the following reasons: a. to be determined by Council.


17

CONCLUSION: Recreational clubs and organisations assist in the development of valuable social, educational, and community skills for the community. Aero Clubs form an integral part of the Airport community, they encourage young and old to pursue their interest in Aviation. Geraldton Airport has a long aviation history with the first Commercial Air Service in Australia departing Geraldton 5 December 1921 and subsequently a prominent WW11 air training base. The Midwest Aero Club carry on this aviation tradition today and forming a link with the past by becoming caretaker tenants of the WW11 Power House, pending their development of a new club rooms would be appropriate if approved by the Council. The equipment in the generator room is to remain and modifications to that room are to be limited. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. AGREE that the Mid West Aero Club (Inc) be given occupancy of the WW11 Power House at Geraldton Airport subject to a Memorandum of Understanding for use as interim club room free of fees, commencing from 24 July 2012 and ceasing on 23 July 2014. Such arrangement to be reviewed by Council with recognition of the stated intent of the Club to develop a new club room facility on Airport land.

2. DELEGATE authority to the Chief Executive to determine and control all matters associated with any works, refurbishment or alterations as may be proposed by the Club to the old powerhouse building, having regard to its heritage value;

3. AGREE in principle to grant a leasehold allotment of land of approximately 240m2 at $1 per annum lease fee, at a site to be determined by the City consistent with the Airport Master Plan, for development by the Club for the purpose of club rooms.


18

OP0001 DELEGATIONS TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-12-34598 AUTHOR: T Mbirimi, Manager Governance & Risk EXECUTIVE: C Wood, Director Organisational

Performance DATE OF REPORT: 25 June 2012 FILE REFERENCE: GO/14/0001 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: City of Greater Geraldton ATTACHMENTS: Yes

SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is to seek adoption of the 2012/2013 Delegated Authority Register as attached.

PROPONENT: The proponent is the City of Greater Geraldton. BACKGROUND: The City, as required by the Local Government Act 1995 s5.46 (2), has conducted a review of the 2011/2012 Delegated Authority Register. Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 provides for Council to delegate some of its powers to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). On 1 July 2011, the Commissioners of the City of Greater Geraldton approved the delegations to the CEO. The review of the 2012/13 delegations provides Council with an overarching document which details what activities the CEO is not able to perform but also provides a comprehensive register of what Council is delegating to him. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: There is no requirement for community consultation on this matter. COUNCILLOR CONSULTATION: There is no requirement for councillor consultation. STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: The following sections of the Local Government Act 1995 are relevant in regards to Delegations:

s5.16 Delegation of some powers and duties to certain committees,

s5.17 Limits on delegation of powers and duties to certain committees,

s5.18 Register of delegations to committees,

s5.42 Delegation of some powers and duties to other employees,

s5.43 Limits on delegations to CEO’s,


19

s5.44 CEO may delegate powers and duties to other employees,

s5.45 Other matters relevant to delegations under this Division; and

s5.46 Register of, and records relevant to, delegations to CEO’s and employees.

The Local Government Act 1995 s5.46 (2) requires that ‘at least once each financial year, delegations are to be reviewed…” In regard to specific delegations other sections of the Local Government Act 1995 and other statutes also apply; Strata Titles Act 1985, Bush Fires Act 1954, Town Planning Scheme No. 3 (Geraldton) and Local Planning Scheme No. 5 (Greenough). POLICY IMPLICATIONS: There are no policy implications. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial and budget implications. STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Outcomes:

Goal 5: Leading the Opportunities.

Outcome 5.1: Leadership and good governance.

Strategy 5.1.3: Implement business, governance, legislative and compliance frameworks.

Regional Outcomes: There are no regional outcomes. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: There are no economic outcomes. Social: There are no social issues. Environmental: There are no environmental issues. Cultural & Heritage: There are no cultural or heritage issues. RELEVANT PRECEDENTS:


20

The delegations to the CEO were endorsed by the Commissioners of the City of Greater Geraldton on 1 July 2011. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There are no delegated authority issues associated with this matter. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Absolute Majority is required. OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act RESOLVES to:

1. NOT ENDORSE the Delegated Authority Register for 2012/2013; and 2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by Council Option 3: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act RESOLVES to:

1. ENDORSE the Delegated Authority Register for 2012/2013 with the following changes;

a. To be determined by Council. 2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by Council. CONCLUSION: The review has been undertaken in line with the Department of Local Government Operational Guideline Number 17 on Delegations. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. ENDORSE the Delegated Authority Register 2012/2013.


21

OP0002 CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON COUNCIL POLICIES

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-12-34525 AUTHOR: T Mbirimi, Manager Governance & Risk EXECUTIVE: C Wood, Director of Organisational

Performance DATE OF REPORT: 25 June 2012 FILE REFERENCE: GO/14/0001 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: City of Greater Geraldton ATTACHMENTS: Yes

SUMMARY: The attached policies for the City of Greater Geraldton have been reviewed in accordance with Section 3.18 of the Local Government Act and are provided to Council for adoption.

PROPONENT: The proponent is the City of Greater Geraldton. BACKGROUND: The majority of these policies were last endorsed by the Commissioners of the City of Greater Geraldton and others subsequently by the Council of the City of Greater Geraldton. The policies have now been reviewed and minor amendments made to align them with the changes in the organisational structure. CP003-Positive Lasting Legacy Principle CP004-Asset Management CP005-Integrated Strategic Planning Framework CP006-Risk Management CP007-Legal Representation on Costs Indemnification CP008-Occupational Health and Safety CP010-Procurement of Goods and Services CP011-Investment Policy CP012-Equal Employment Opportunity CP013-Record Keeping CP016-Regional Price Preference CP017-Joint Reform Policy-Local Assets and local funding CP018-Joint Reform Policy-Local identity CP019-Joint Reform Policy-Local Workforce CP020-Joint Reform Policy-Untied Road Funding CP021-Payments to Employees in addition to Contract or Award CP022-Youth Policy CP023-Heritage Policy CP024-Establishing Sister City Relationships CP026-Memorial Seating Plaques Policy CP027-Councillor Professional Development CP028-Councillor Travel and Accommodation CP033-Community Funding Policy CP045-Commemorative Plaques at the HMAS Sydney II Memorial Site at Mount Scott


22

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: Community consultation was not necessary in this instance. Council Policy 016 –Regional Price Preference was advertised for submission via public noticed in March 2011, prior to its adoption in July 2011. No submissions were received. At review, no changes were made to the policy that alters its purpose as originally adopted. COUNCILLOR/OFFICER CONSULTATION: Policies were reviewed with consultation of all policy owners. STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: Section 3.18 of the Local Government Act 1995. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The attached policies were adopted as a favoured direction for the City and will continue to be applied to assist in the governance of the City of Greater Geraldton. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial or budget implications. STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Outcomes: Goal 5: Leading the Opportunities.

Outcome 5.1: Leadership and good governance.

Strategy 5.1.3: Implement business, governance, legislative and compliance frameworks.

Regional Outcomes: There are no regional outcomes. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: There are no economic outcomes. Social: There are no social issues. Environmental: There are no environmental issues.


23

Cultural & Heritage: There are no cultural or heritage issues. RELEVANT PRECEDENTS: The majority of these Council policies were endorsed by the Commissioners of the City of Greater Geraldton on 1 July 2011 and others subsequently by the Council of the City of Greater Geraldton. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There is no delegated authority. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Simple Majority is required. OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Simple Majority, pursuant to Section 5.20 of the Local Government Act 1995, RESOLVES to:

1. ENDORSE the Council Policies with the following changes: a. To be determined by Council.

2. MAKE the determination based on the following reason: a. To be determined by Council.

Option 3: That Council by Simple Majority, pursuant to Section 5.20 of the Local Government Act 1995, RESOLVES to:

1. NOT ENDORSE the Council Policies; 2. MAKE the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by Council CONCLUSION: These policies will continue to provide direction to the elected members and staff of the City of Greater Geraldton in overseeing the affairs of the local government. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Simple Majority, pursuant to Section 5.20 of the Local Government act 1995, RESOLVES to

1. ENDORSE the following reviewed Council Policies of the City of Greater Geraldton:

a. CP003-Positive Lasting Legacy Principle b. CP004-Asset Management c. CP005-Integrated Strategic Planning Framework


24

d. CP006-Risk Management Policy; e. CP007-Legal Representation on Costs Indemnification; f. CP008-Occupational Health and Safety; g. CP010-Procurement of Goods and Services; h. CP011-Investment Policy; i. CP013-Record Keeping; j. CP016-Regional Price Preference; k. CP017-Joint Reform Policy-Local Assets and Local Funding; l. CP018-Joint Reform Policy-Local Identity; m. CP019-Joint Reform Policy-Local Workforce; n. CP020-Joint Reform Policy-Untied Road Funding

Arrangements; o. CP021-Payments to Employees in addition to Contract or

Award; p. CP022-Youth Policy; q. CP023-Heritage Policy; r. CP024-Establishing Sister City Relationships; s. CP026-Memorial Seating Plaques Policy; t. CP027-Councillor Professional Development; u. CP028-Councillor Travel and Accommodation; and v. CP045-Commemorative Plaques at the HMAS Sydney II

Memorial Site at Mount Scott.


25

CC073 HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-12-33652 AUTHOR: S Smith, Arts, Manager Libraries and

Heritage EXECUTIVE: A Selvey, Director, Creative Communities DATE OF REPORT: 2 July 2012 FILE REFERENCE: GO/6/0012 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: City of Greater Geraldton ATTACHMENTS: No

SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is to seek a Council resolution to include another Councillor representative on the Heritage Advisory Committee. PROPONENT: The proponent is the Heritage Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND: The Heritage Advisory Committee, as an advisory committee of Council was established after the election of Council in 2011. The Committee is diverse in membership and includes two Councillors (Mayor, Ian Carpenter and Cr Neil Bennett), three community representatives, representatives of the three historical museums, the Geraldton Greenough Historical Society and heritage professionals including the Manager of the WA Museum, Geraldton, the National Trust, the Department of Indigenous Affairs and the Heritage Council’s Mid-West Heritage Advisor. Relevant Council staff attend the meetings as required. At the May Meeting of the Heritage Advisory Committee the Mayor reported that Cr Tarleah Thomas has expressed an interest in joining the Committee. The Committee is unanimous in supporting Cr Thomas’ inclusion on the grounds that further representation of Mullewa is important for the Committee’s considerations. (See Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting held on 21 May 2012 under Reports to be received.) Barbara Thomas is currently the only representative from Mullewa. Cr Thomas is a Heritage, Culture and Arts Champion under Council’s Champions Policy. The Committee resolved to recommend Cr Thomas’ inclusion to Council. This report brings that recommendation before Council. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: Community representatives are included in the Committee membership. COUNCILLOR CONSULTATION: Two Councillors are members of the Committee. This report recommends that this be increased to three.


26

STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: There are no Statutory Implications. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: There are no policy implications. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial or budgetary implications. STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Outcomes: Goal 3: Opportunities for Creativity

Outcome 3.1: A community that embraces and celebrates diversity.

Strategy 3.1.4: Preserve and activate the heritage of our community

Regional Outcomes: The are no regional issues. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: Cultural tourism has an important role in the local economy. Social: Provides for increased social input from the outlying eastern region of the City. Environmental: There are no environmental issues. Cultural & Heritage: Improves the cultural and heritage representation on the Committee. RELEVANT PRECEDENTS: Several Council Advisory Committees contain more than two Councillors. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There is no delegated authority. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995, an absolute majority is required.


27

OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Absolute Majority, under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995, RESOLVES to:

1. DECLINE to increase the Councillor representation on the Heritage Advisory Committee;

2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason: a. to be determined by Council.

Option 3: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. DEFER consideration to increase Councillor representation on the Heritage Advisory Committee;

2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason: a. to be determined by Council

Option 4: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. INCREASE the Councillor representation on the Heritage Advisory

Committee to three (3) Councillors; and 2. APPOINT Cr __________________ to the Heritage Advisory

Committee. CONCLUSION: The Heritage Advisory Committee is an established Committee of Council. The Committee has received, and supports, a request from Cr Thomas to be included on the Committee. Cr Thomas is a Heritage, Culture and Arts Champion of Council. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Absolute Majority under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to:

1. INCREASE the Councillor representation on the Heritage Advisory Committee to three (3) Councillors; and

2. APPOINT Cr Thomas to the Heritage Advisory Committee.


28

CC074 203 LESTER AVENUE TENANCY

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-11-26402 AUTHOR: J Gill, A/Manager Community

Empowerment and Development L MacLeod, Coordinator Land & Property Services

EXECUTIVE: A Selvey, Director Creative Communities DATE OF REPORT: 20 June 2012 FILE REFERENCE: R22257 APPLICANT / PROPONENT: City of Greater Geraldton ATTACHMENTS: No

SUMMARY: The premises at 203 Lester Avenue are vested in the City of Greater Geraldton and are currently occupied by the Midwest Multicultural Association on a short term tenancy that expired on June 30 2012. PROPONENT: The proponent is the City of Greater Geraldton. BACKGROUND: In January 2012 Council granted a six month lease of the building at 203 Lester Avenue located on Reserve 22257 which is vested in the City of Greater Geraldton by way of a Management Order for the purpose of “Community Purposes” with the power to lease for a period of up to 21 years subject to Ministerial consent. It was intended to undertake a full review to explore options for the future of the site and the building by March 2012, however the review has not yet been finalised. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: Community consultation will be undertaken as part of the full review. COUNCILLOR CONSULTATION: No Councillors consultation has been undertaken. STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:

Pursuant to section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 – Disposing of Property (1) In this section –

“dispose” includes to sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of, whether absolutely or not;

“property” includes the whole or any part of the interest of a local government in property, but does not include money.

(3) A local government can dispose of property other than under

subsection (2) if, before agreeing to dispose of the property – (a) it gives local public notice of the proposed disposition –


29

(i) describing the property concerned; and (ii) giving details of the proposed disposition; and (iii) inviting submissions to be made to the local government

before a date to be specified in the notice, being a date not less than 2 weeks after the notice is first given; and

(b) it considers any submissions made to it before the date specified in the notice and, if its decision is made by the council or a committee, the decision and the reasons for it are recorded in the minutes of the meeting at which the decision was made.

Pursuant to Regulation 30 (1) and (2)(b)(i) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 - a disposition of property under s 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 is an exempt disposition if the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not where the objects of which are of a charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational sporting or other like nature.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS: There are no policy implications FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: A commencement fee of $305.00 per annum plus GST for sporting and community groups reviewed annually as per the adopted City of Greater Geraldton Schedule of Fees and Charges will apply. The lessees will be responsible for all outgoings including rates, electricity, water usage and minor maintenance STRATEGIC & REGIONAL OUTCOMES: Strategic Community Plan Future Outcomes: Goal 3: Opportunity for Creativity

Outcome 3.1: A community that embraces and celebrates diversity

Strategy 3.1.1 Create vibrant and diverse neighbourhoods that meet local and regional needs

Regional Outcomes: Organisations such as the Midwest Multicultural Association support members and new arrivals across the region. These networks strengthens the community culturally, socially and economically. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL ISSUES: Economic: Although Council will not be receiving market value rental for the premises it will be providing volunteers in the community with a base to be able to be


30

more accessible and effective in their support of the wider community until the review of the use of the premises is completed. Social: The accessibility of the premises for the Midwest Multicultural Association will be invaluable as they offer assistance with language classes, support for visas and assist families from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse backgrounds as they settle in the region. Environmental: There are no environmental impacts in the proposal. Cultural & Heritage: Organisations such as the Midwest Multicultural Association and the Midwest African Association are all volunteers who offer assistance to families from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse backgrounds as they settle in the region. RELEVANT PRECEDENTS: The City leases land and/or buildings to other community organisations such as Lotteries House, the Menshed Geraldton and Girl Guides Association. The City of Greater Geraldton’s Schedule of Fees and Charges apply in all situations. DELEGATED AUTHORITY: There is no delegated authority existing related to this proposal. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Simple majority is required. OPTIONS: Option 1: As per Executive Recommendation in this report. Option 2: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) RESOLVES to:

1. DECLINE the short term tenure of 203 Lester Avenue to the Midwest Multicultural Association and leave the building vacant.

2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason: a. To be determined by council.

Option 3: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) RESOLVES to:

1. DEFER the lease of 203 Lester Avenue: 2. MAKES the determination based on the following reason:

a. To be determined by council.


31

CONCLUSION: The Executive Recommendation would ensure that the building is tenanted while the review of the future of the building is finalised. Tenancy of the building will enhance the vibrancy of the area and reduce the possibility of vandalism. Adoption of the Executive Recommendation would also provide the Midwest Multicultural Association (MWMA) short term office space and meeting rooms from which they can continue to work with people from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse backgrounds. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) RESOLVES to:

1. APPROVE short term tenure of 203 Lester Avenue to the Midwest Multicultural Association Inc;

2. SET the proposed conditions as: a. the term to be of not more than six months commencing 1 July

2012 and concluding 31 December 2012; b. a pro rata fee to be calculated based on the lease fee of

$305.00 per annum as per the adopted City of Greater Geraldton Schedule of Fees and Charges 2012/13;

c. the lessee to be responsible for separately paying all outgoings including all utilities, rates and minor maintenance; and

d. any costs associated with the preparation and execution of the lease document are to be borne by the lessee.


32

14 REPORTS TO BE RECEIVED

REPORTS TO BE RECEIVED

AGENDA REFERENCE: D-12-34837 AUTHOR: A Brun, Chief Executive

Officer DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: No FILE REFERENCE: GO/6/0002 DATE OF REPORT: 10 July 2012

BACKGROUND: Information and items for noting or receiving (i.e. periodic reports, minutes of other meetings) are to be included in an appendix attached to the Council agenda. Any reports received under this Agenda are considered received only. Any recommendations or proposals contained within the “Reports (including Minutes) to be Received” are not approved or endorsed by Council in any way. Any outcomes or recommendations requiring Council approval must be presented separately to Council as a Report for consideration at an Ordinary Meeting of Council. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENT: The following reports are attached in the Appendix to this agenda:

Reports of Sustainable Communities

SCDD065 Delegated Determinations

Reports of Creative Communities

CC075 Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes of Meeting May 2012

CC076 Seniors Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

Reports of Treasury and Finance

TF0012 Confidential List of Accounts paid under delegation

CONSULTATION: Not applicable. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT: Not applicable. VOTING REQUIREMENTS: Simple majority is required. EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: That Council by Simple Majority RESOLVES to RECEIVE the appended reports attached to this agenda.


33

PART A That Council by Simple Majority pursuant to Section 22.(2) of the Local Government Act 1995 RESOLVES to

1. RECEIVE the following appended reports: a. Reports – Creative Communities

i. CC075 Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes of Meeting May 2012; and

ii. CC076 Seniors Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes. PART B That Council by Simple Majority, pursuant to Sections 5.13 and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 RESOLVES to:

1. RECEIVE the following appended reports: a. Reports – Department of Treasury and Finance;

i. TF0012 Confidential List of Accounts paid under delegations.

a. Reports – Department of Sustainable Communities; and i. SCDD065 Delegated Determinations.

15 ELECTED MEMBERS MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN

16 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN

GIVEN 17 URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY PRESIDING MEMBER OR BY

DECISION OF THE MEETING 18 CLOSURE


34

APPENDIX 1 – ATTACHMENTS AND REPORTS TO BE RECEIVED Attachments and Reports to be Received are available on the City of Greater Geraldton website at: http://www.cgg.wa.gov.au/your-council/meetings

http://www.cgg.wa.gov.au/your-council/meetings

ordinary meeting of council agenda - city of ......2012/07/24 · ordinary meeting of council...

Documents