oregon ms goal report 2009

8/14/2019 Oregon MS Goal Report 2009

1/22

OMS GOAL REPORT FALL 2009

Oregon School District - Middle School - Goal Report p. 1

Oregon School District - Middle School - Goal Report 2009

Page Contents

2 Enrollment

3 Reading Goal

9 Math Goal

13 Culture Goal

20 Character Goal

22 Community Goal


2/22



OMS Enrollment 2008-2009 The

mission

of Oregon Middle School is to develop conscientious citizens, foster positive attitudes, respect and

appreciate individuals, and achieve academic excellence.


3/22



OMS Readin Goal Oregon Middle School students will improve reading f luency and comprehension as demonstrated by the following:

An increased percentage of students scoring at least in the average range (above 25%ile) on the WKCE and MAPassessments. This goal is for the overall grade levels and sub-groups.

Students identified proficient in reading on MAP will show longitudinal growth from Spring to Spring MAP assessment.

An increase in the percentage of students working at or above growth index on the MAP assessment. An increase in the percentage of students scoring in the advanced/proficient ranges on WKCE. Students meet their Reading Goal as stated in their IEP, 504 or ILP goals.

Strategies and Action Steps Evaluation Criteria/Results

Continue with OMS Literacy Committee. Review the presentation with staff given at the June staff meeting giving common strategies for all staff to use as

well as common vocabulary strategies.

See staff using strategies more easily in classrooms An increase in student achievement data for comprehension in reading.

OMS Regular meetings on the other 1/2 of the day the PBIS team is meeting.Monitor student and staff data and feedback to keep the OMS literacy planmoving forward as developed Spring 09.

Plan will continue with modifications based on teams assessment of student and staff progressin using and implementing various strategies.Increase in student achievement in reading.

Continue the JRN (Jamestown Reading Navigator) Program for 7th and 8thgrade in our Literacy Skills course. This is our Level 2 Reading Intervention inreference to RtI.

Use MAP fall test to further clarify students for Level 2 intervention as identified from spring MAP data.Monitor program success throughout the year to see if we are moving students out as we wouldlike. Using built assessment program in JRN as well as MAP will demonstrate a more significantgrowth for students in our second year of JRN implementation.

Workshops for Tutors provided by our Literacy Coach and any Literacy Committee members who would wish to participate.

More tutors able to work and reinforce students in reading and comprehensions strategies. An increase in student reading achievement.

Common assessment practices of writing developed in collaboration of theOMS Literacy committee and the language arts department. This will beintroduced at Staff meetings and professional development days.

Students achievement will go up on writing activities evidenced in WKCE 2010.

Allocate at the first Wednesday of the Month Staff meeting for every monthtime for the OMS Literacy Committee to present and share information withstaff to help keep the fidelity of the OMS Literacy Plan to help studentachievement in Literacy.

Agendas for the 2009-2010 reflect time allocation for Literacy as well as leading by the OMSLiteracy CommitteeStaff feedback stating more comfortable in using literacy strategies as well as visible evidence of use in classroom instruction.

OMS Literacy developing a plan for more level 3 interventions in addition toSpecial Education.

OMS Plan will indicate strategies on interventions for Level 3 and work on implementing thosebefore the end of the school year as well as preparation for the 10-11 school year.

D E L I V E R Y

C U R R I C

A S S E S S M E N T S

E X T E R N A L

A S S M N T S

A S S M N T S

D E L I V E R Y


4/22



OMS Readin Goal Literac Action Plan Literacy Action Plan

Oregon Middle School2009-2010

Taking Action Goal Statement #1: All students will learn and routinely use reading, writing, and vocabulary strategies to enhance literacyand learning across all content areas.

AAction Step

BTimeline (target date)

CLead Person(s)

DResources Needed

ESpecifics of

Implementation

FEvidence of Success

The Literacy Team willselect a common set of

literacy support strategies.

June 3, 2009 Literacy team members with input from entire

faculty.

Team meeting to gatherstrategies (building priorknowledge, questioning, taking notes, organizing information,

vocabulary) pg. 187 Have to Kim by May 29 th along

with concerns/excitements Meeting to organize: June 1st

Resource guide for staff

Presentation of strategiesand plan for staff.

-June 3, 2009 (overview andntro. of strategies) and-August Inservice (depth anddiscussion withindepartments/teams)

Literacy Team Folder/binder/electronicstrategies

Time

Decide on June 1 st Meetings completed

Professional developmentfor staff on the strategies.

September and October16th early release

Literacy Team

Literacy Coach

Videos of teachers using strategies

Literacy Team memberspresent a single strategy tothe staff during inservice.

Binders for August Presentation of

strategies and time toapply to class in August

September: trial runs inclasses

October: in-depthdiscussions/plans forimplementation

Anecdotal records Positive discussions Frequency of

implementation


5/22



OMS Readin Goal Literac Action Plan

Collaboration withindepartments and teams

while implementing strategies.

Department Meetings:1x/month

Team Meetings:2x/month

Literacy Team Members Structure to facilitatediscussions

Team and departmentmeeting time

Pending structure Evidence in team/dept. meeting notes

More resources andexamples for staff

Teacher modeling andscaffolding of strategies forstudents.

Quarter 1: one strategy Quarter 2: introduce others

Literacy Coach

Literacy Team

Planning time Inservices

Start easy and progressto more difficultstrategies

Teacher reflection onlesson

ObservationsFollow-through for staff withobservations and literacy-walk throughs.

Beginning Quarter 1 Literacy Coach

Literacy Team

Release time Coordinate with teamsto see strategies in action

Observation Calendar Observation Tools

Observations withinclassrooms

Evidence in allclassrooms

Analyze effectiveness of strategies through student

work analysis and teacherinstruction.

End of each quarter Literacy Team

Teachers

Release time

Student Self-Reporting

Student work samples Teacher Reflection

8th grade Bi-Quarterly growth

Plan for students to show evidence of knowledgeand strategy use.

Pilot for Literacy Team members in2009-2010

June 2010

Literacy Team

SLC Team

SLC Binders

SLC

AAction Step

BTimeline (target date)

CLead Person(s)

DResources Needed

ESpecifics of

Implementation

FEvidence of Success


6/22



Tier 1-2 Data and Tier 3 Narrative (Reading) Map and Local Outcome Assessments

52.8%(270)

39.9%(204)

6.3% (32) 1.0% (5)

MAP Reading S06-S07Growth Index

Below Above

P r o j e c t e

d P r o f i c i e n c y

B e l o w

A b o v e

Quadrant Legend Below Growth: Students growth index is less than zero

Above Growth: Students growth index is greater than orequal to zero Above Proficiency: Students performance is projected to

be above the state standard Below Proficiency: Students performance is projected to

be below the state standard

37.9(178)

54.9%(258)

5.3%(25)

1.9%(9)


Below Above

P r o j e c t e


B e l o w

A b o v e

38.3%(189)

52.9%(261)

7.7%(38)

1.0%(5)


Below Above

P r o j e c t e


B e l o w

A b o v e

Tier 3 NarrativeOur overall percentage of students went up slightly in the proficient range (92.8to 91.2). We had an increase in the Below Proficiency Below Growth quadrantof 2.4% which we will need to focus more attention on finding the sub-groupsand meeting the individual needs of these students.

Longitudinal Data (MAP/WKCE)Percent of students reading above 25%ile

MAP

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

Grade 7

Grade 8

* 80 77 83

* 85 81 79

WKCE2005-

062006-

072007-

082008-

09

Grade 7

Grade 8

79 81 75 81

86 78 79 81

Tier 3 NarrativeOverall the MAP assessment reflects an overall growth for grades 7 and 8 over thepast 3 years. The WKCE assessment demonstrates a drop in grade 7 but steady at82% the last two years. The WKCE assessment indicates for g rade 8 one 7% drop

in 06 to 06 but steady over the past three years with no real growth or decline.This reading data is broke into more subgroups for analysis in the appendix.


7/22



Reading Data WKCE

Tier 3 Narrative

Grade 7 reflects a four year average of 90.4% Advanced andProficient. Although there has been a slight decline since 2005the last two years 2007-2008 the students have demonstrated noloss.

Grade 8 dipped in 2006 and 2007 but did show a little growth

last fall to 92%. Over the last four years the average percentageof advanced and proficient for grade 8 has been 91.3%

0

25

50

75

100

56 55 52 59

92 94 88 88

2005 2006 2007 2008

Grade 7 Reading

% Advanced% Advanced & Proficient

0

25

50

75

100

56 52 4755

95 89 89 92

2005 2006 2007 2008

Grade 8 Reading


OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL VISION

Individualizing learning for parents, studentsand staff

N avigating toward excellenceSharing responsibility for success of allstudentsP roducing positive, collaborative energy Including ALLR eflecting and collaborating for continuousimprovement

E ngaging students in rigorous learning


8/22



OMS Reading RtI Data - End of Year

Tier 3 Narrative63 students received level 2 InterventionsUsing the JRN Rit Score which is aligned with MAP and using the Spring RiT score to measure reading level only three students metreading level proficiency by the end of the 0809 school year. However, when we identify students we are looking for students that are ator below the 25%ile. The %ile aligned with our State WKCE test is a RIT of 202 17%ile for grade 7 and RIT 204 14%ile for grade 8.

When using the RIT Score aligned with WKCE 36 students met proficiency. Overall, we had an average gain using RIT of 6.2 forgrade 7 and 4.5 for grade 8. Using the aligned scores 57% of the students met proficiency.

At this time we do not have any other level 3 inter ventions other then special education. Part of our Literacy Goal/Competency is toidentify more level 3 interventions.

The 8O team did double up on language arts for a couple students with anecdotal evidence by teachers stating they felt it did helpthose few students.


9/22



OMS Math Goal Oregon Middle School students will improve mathematical skills which will be demonstrated by the following:

An increased percentage of students scoring at least in the average range (above 25%ile) on the WKCE and MAPassessments. This goal is for the overall grade levels and sub-groups.

Students identified proficient in reading on MAP will show longitudinal growth from Spring to Spring MAP assessment.

An increase in the percentage of students working at or above growth index on the MAP assessment. An increase in the percentage of students scoring in the advanced/proficient ranges on WKCE. Students meet their Reading Goal as stated in their IEP, 504 or ILP goals.


Add a course/section for math that differentiates for students who learn mathdifferently.

Add two sections of math for 7th grade to pilot double math time for students.

Pilot with 8O TeamHave At-Risk Position teach the two sections of 7th grade Math

Math Lab would re-teach and pre-teach concepts covered in CMP on whichstudents are currently working.

Teacher would work with math teachers in preparation for pre-teaching and re-teaching strategies

Continued use of the wonderful benefit of Schools of Hope tutors.Continue to provide training for Schools of Hope Tutors for CMP

Training for Tutors - coordinating with Pang Vang to arrange training

Further train OMS EAs in use and support of CMP Curriculum Coordinate with Michelle Gard for EA training Use team EA in supporting Math Lab and 8O Math Class

A few questions on each review that are multiple choice At least one question on each test is multiple choice Work on CMP benchmarks to add indicators for Tier 1 instead of using just Algebra student.

At least one question on each test is multiple choiceSuggest goal setting for MAP testing

Meet 2-3 times during the 0910 school year to check strategies and work onCMP benchmarks for Tier 1 indicatorsMath Literacy Plan for 0910 - Investigate this possibility and lay the ground

work

Evaluate CMP outcome assessmentsReview MAP and WKCE data when availableReview teacher data on 8O and Math Lab interventionsIdentify CMP Benchmarks to use for Tier 1

D E L I V E R Y


E X T E R N A L

C U R R I C U L

C U R R I C

D E L I V E R Y


10/22



Tier 1-2 Data and Tier 3 Narrative (Math) Map and Local Outcome Assessments

41.1%(216)

48.1%(253)

9.1%(48))

1.7%(9)

MAP Math S06-S07Growth Index

Below Above

P r o j e c t e


B e l o w

A b o v e

Quadrant Legend Below Growth: Students growth index is less than zero

Above Growth: Students growth index is greater than orequal to zero Above Proficiency: Students performance is projected to

be above the state standard Below Proficiency: Students performance is projected to

be below the state standard

32.7%(157)

53.8%(258)

10.2%(49)

3.3%(16)


Below Above

P r o j e c t e


B e l o w

A b o v e

40.6%(189)

49.5%(230)

6.7%(31)

3.2%(15)


Below Above

P r o j e c t e


B e l o w

A b o v e

Tier 3 NarrativeOverall our percentage of students below proficiency and below growth has

decreased. However, we have not consistently increased out percentage in theabove growth and above proficiency quadrant. Another positive data point isthat we have increased our proficient range on MAP to just over 90% which isthe highest it has been in the last three years.

More detailed data can be found in the appendix.

Longitudinal Data (MAP/WKCE)Percent of students reading above 25%ile

MAP

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

Grade 7

Grade 8

* 74 80 83

* 77 80 82

WKCE2005-

062006-

072007-

082008-

09

Grade 7

Grade 8

89 88 82 82

90 83 80 83

Tier 3 NarrativeOver the past three years on the MAPassessment both grade 7 and grade 8have shown a slight increase each yearfor students above the 25%ile level.

WIth respect to the WKCE results ourpattern is less consistent and hasdemonstrated a drop from 2005-2006.Excerpts from Math Data MeetingSpring 2009 7th grade advanced level increased

almost 20% for WKCE almostdoubled from 2007 to 2008!

Basic Decreased by 7% for WKCE at7th grade

8th grade advanced increased by 5%

7th and 8th grade P and A on WKCE were between 83% and 85% of thepopulation

Constructed responses for 7th grade most had top scores

MAP most kids are above grade levelof 224 for fall testing

21 kids in top 20-25 of Explore Test WKCE basic and minimal are

decreasing over time! 7th and 8th grade scores for

Advances and Proficient were abovethe state average and Minimal andBasic were below the state average

3,4,5 WKCE have a basic andminimal of less than 10%

4th and 5th g rade WKCE advanced was over 60%


11/22



Math Data - WKCE/Outcomes

Tier 3 Narrative

The two charts above represent grades 7 and grade 8 according to the WKCE breakdown of % Advanced and % Proficient and Advanced. The WKCE indicator is different then the 25%ile we use. However, we have been using this data to give us a different perspective and areference point provided by the state.

The outcomes in the chart to the left represent only the students whohave been taking Algebra. One of the goal of math for the next year isto better identify benchmarks by which we can measure more studentgrowth in addition to WKCE and MAP.

0

22.5

45

67.5

90

24 21 20

39

7786

7784

2005 2006 2007 2008

Grade 7 Math


0

22.5

45

67.5

90

18 19 19 24

8476 81

83

2005 2006 2007 2008

Grade 8 Math


0

25

50

75

100

69

9882

95

2007-08 2008-09

Outcomes Grades 7 & 8

Grade 7 Grade 8With the implementation of the new math series at OMS in 2007-2008 we only used outcomes with students taking algebra for grades 7 and 8


12/22



OMS Culture Goals CULTURE GOALMaintain or increase student, staff, and parent ratings in student safety, meeting academic needs,and student achievement through relationships between students and teachers

OMS Student Survey PercentageAgree

of Studentsor Strongl

espondingy Agree

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12(1) I feel safe in this school 62% 77%(16) The work at school is challenging 45% 47%(38) My teachers know me well 44% 50%

OMS Parent Survey PercentageAgree

f Parentsor Stron

Respondily Agree

g

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12(5a) I believe my child is safe while at school 77 82%

(8e) My childs school meets the academic needs of itsstudents

72 77%

OMS Staff Survey PercentageAgree

of Staff R r Strong

espondingy Agree

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12(36) I believe student achievement can increase throughclose personal relationships between students and teachers

89% 97%

(45) I believe that every student can learn 89% 100%

(47) The school provides an atmosphere where everystudent can succeed

50% 33%

District Indicators of Success


13/22



OMS Culture Goal


Continue a Culture Committee at OMS that meets every month orevery other month to monitor and plan activities to help staff deal

with stress and issues that are causing concern to a few, some ormany staff.

See an increase in positive survey results reflecting that staff care about one another and that the school isa good educational environment for students to learn.Successful execution of positive team building and staff wide building activities to help staff feel morepart of the OMS team.

This will be demonstrated in the staff climate survey.

Have a clear focus for the 2009-2010 school year on the schoolclimate, student behavior (PBIS) and competency specifically Literacy.

Continue the positive parent student perception of OMS being a safe school and excellent educationalenvironment evidences through the climate survey.See an increase in staff perception of building climate and culture. When staff make detention, refocus oroffice referrals (not major offenses) the staff member is to call home to facilitate a positivecommunication about the incident with the parent. Administration will assist staff if requested.

Increase parent positive presence in the building through the effortsof the 5-to-8 Parent Group

Survey comments from parents will indicate that they feel the middle school is very open to theirassistance and being part of the education of the students.Staff survey will indicate a stronger comfortability with parent help and presence as a result of the 5-to-8group and the Tutoring Program

Use communication form to reinforce professional dialog tocontinue to move OMS in a positive direction.

Share the form at the Luncheon or at the first inservice with staff.Show how it can and should be used with concerns between staff and between staff and administration.

The form requires data and evidence to be used in making informed decisions.

Use of a new team minutes form. Teams use a standard minutes/meetings form to share information Teams are even more consistent in sharing information

Teams are able to communicate more clearly to pupil services, administration and encore through the new form.

Principal at Team Meetings The principal will let the teams know at the beginning of each month which two meetings he will attend. The principal will bring one of the office support staff to take notes in staff, team and BET meetings sothat all members can be fully present and focused.

OMS Administration will send out a short weekly newsletter for staff 90% Staff will report higher level of communication and being informed.Data and staff perceptions will be more in alignment.75% Staff will report the middle school being an excellent environment for students to learn.

Maintain or increase student, staff, and parent ratings in studentsafety, meeting academic needs, and student achievement throughrelationships between students and teachers

D E L I V E R Y

E X T E R N A L

C U R R I C U L U M

D E L I V E R

A S S E S S M E

D E L I V E R Y

D E L I V E R Y


14/22



OMS Character Goals

OMS Student Survey PercentageAgree

of Studenr Strongl

ts Respony Agree

ing

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

I feel like I am in charge of what I learn 32% 34.3%I am treated with respect by other students at this school 50% 58.2%

The person most responsible for what I learn is myself 62% 72.2%I am doing my best in school 63% 74.8%Students at this school respect other students who are different than they are 32% 36.5%

OMS Parent Survey PercentageAgree

of Parentsor Strong

espondinly Agree

g

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Students show respect for each other 41% 47%

Teachers show respect for students 73% 76%

I respect the schools teachers 82% 81%I respect the schools principal 77% 74%

OMS Staff Survey PercentageAgree

of Staff R or Strong

espondingly Agree

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12I feel that staff care about me 78% 51.5%

I work with people who treat me with respect 77% 64.7%

My administrator treats me with respect 78% 61.7%

CHARACTER GOALMaintain or increase student, staff, and parent ratings in students, staff and

parents reporting a respectful school environment.

District Indicators of Success


15/22



10

40

70

100

130

160

Sep08 Oct08 Nov08 Dec08 Jan09 Feb09 Mar09 Apr09 May09

R = 0.7474R = 0.6889

Refocus Room Referrals

OMS Character Goal

2007-08 2008-09


16/22



0

50

100

150

200

Sep08 Oct08 Nov08 Dec08 Jan09 Feb09 Mar09 Apr09 May09

R = 0 .1869

R = 0.0189

Detention Referrals

2008-09 0708-HW 2007-2008

OMS Character Goal


17/22



0

6

12

18

24

30

Sep08 Oct08 Nov08 Dec08 Jan09 Feb09 Mar09 Apr09 May09 June09

OMS Character Goal 2007-08 2008-09

# of ISS 196 146

0809Number of Students


18/22



OMS Character Goal

0

3

6

9

12

15

Sep08 Oct08 Nov08 Dec08 Jan09 Feb09 Mar09 Apr09 May09 June09

OMS Out-of-School Suspensions 0809

2008-09Number of Students


19/22



OMS Character Goal

0

10

20

30

40

31

21

7

2 2

1 2-3 4-5 6-710-11

ISS

0

5

10

15

2020

14

12

1 2-3 4-5 6-7

OSS Students Suspension

OSS


20/22



OMS Character Goal


A building wide focus on positive student behavior interventions led by the building PBIS (Behavior) Committee

Staff survey results indicating they feel the school is a safe and excellent place for students tolearn

Weekly CARE Reminder s (Proactive) in Homebase A decrease in behav iors since adolescents will be reminded r egularly, which research hasshown is important.

Monthly PBIS (Behavior) Committee Meetings for 1/2 Day or site visits. Thesemeetings will involve reviewing behavior data, increasing our CARE criteria for new situations, providing staff development on positive behavior interactions to helpredirect or re-teach adolescents how to make positive choices.

A decrease in behaviors since adolescents will be reminded regularly, which research hasshown is important.20% Fewer suspensions then 080915% Fewer detentions then 080930% Fewer refocus room behavioral referrals then 0809

A more flat line for referrals throughout the year instead of a gradual increase.50% decrease in the amount of students referred more than twice to the office

NVCI (Non Violent Crisis Intervention Training) October Full Day Inservice Help foster a common language for building staff Help identify states of behavior and choose from appropriate strategies to deal with thestudent in a positive manner and not escalate their behavior.

An administrator from OMS will attend a DPI sponsored PBIS training. This will resultin OMS having access to training and tools from the state.

Get materials and information resulting in identifying schools for site visits.Get materials and information resulting in identifying individuals to come and work with ourPBIS committee and staff during meetings or professional development days.

Each Staff Meeting on the First Wednesday of the Month will have time allocated for

the PBIS team to speak to staff and give reminders, data updates, etc. so that wecontinue to have consistency and keep people informed.

Better survey results on communication and the overall feel for the building regarding

student behavior success and staff stress.

Coordinate with the DPI to bring in a training for the PBIS team in October orNovember as well as a team to the Spring PBIS State wide universal training tentatively scheduled for April 2009

Contact DPI and set g roundwork for training

Invite PBIS certified trainer to work with OMS PBIS team throughout the year during monthly meetings

Contact Rachel Saladis and send dates of meetings for 0910 school year and about the of providing the two day PBIS team training or putting me in contact with the Illinois PBIS

Technical Team to receive the training.

Maintain or increase student, staff, and parent ratings in students, staff and parents reporting a respectful school environment.


E X T E R

C U R R I C U

D E L I V

D E L I

E X T E R

E X T E R

E X T E R


21/22


22/22



OMS Community Goal


Implement common grading Symbols decided upon in 08-09 Parent Feedback through surveys and informal notes taken by teams with parents

Continue to meet regularly with the 5-to-8 Parent Group Increased number of OMS and RCI ParentsSuccessful planning and hosting of a total of 5 Parent Education Nights at OMS and RCISuccessful access to Community Education and Parent Outreach contacts at district officeIncreased positive feedback on survey related to transition and communication

Schools of Hope Tutoring Program Support Tutor Coordinator in increasing our Tutor volunteers to help meet the needs of ourstudents

To Double the Tutoring at OMS To expand the Tutoring program throughout the 8th grade population An increase in achievement reflected in student grades, Tier 1 Assessments and Districtoutcomes.

Through the use of an opt-in E-Newsletter be able to update parents in a morefrequent format using electronic communication

Post the E-Newsletter Link on our OMS websitePut the E-Newsletter Link in our Paper NewsletterSee 20-30% of parents subscribe to the E-Newsletter

Support the Teams in use of technology to communicate more with parents suchas blogs used by the 8O and 8M team.

Teams report statistics showing hits on their Blogs, Moodle Sites. Teams report students and parent anecdotal comments reflecting use of the sites.

Through the use of an OMS Twitter be able to update parents in a more realtimeformat for short pieces of information.

Post the OMS Twitter Link on our OMS websitePut the OMS Twitter LInk in our Paper NewsletterSee 20-30% of (parents and students) subscribe to the Twitter account

Continued use of Call-em-all system and E-Mail blast to remind parents of important events or situations that are about to happen or did happen.

Survey responses from parents will indicate communication is excellent from OMS and thatthey feel well informed.

Maintain or increase parent ratings in students, staff and parents reporting arespectful school environment, communication from the school and feeling part of the Oregon Middle School.

E X T E R N A L C U R R I C U

D E L I

E X T E R N

E X T E R N A L

E X T E R N A L

D E L I

oregon ms goal report 2009

Documents