origin, growth and development of...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter- 3
ORIGIN, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF
CERAMIC INDUSTRY
ORIGIN, GROWTH AND DEVELOPl\'lENT OF CERAMIC INDUSTRY
Pottery is said to be the oldest of industries that was bom of man's early attempts to
fulfill his basic necessities of life. Being one of the oldest crafts - more than 10,000 years old -
man has expressed his feelings and his aesthetic sense in clay i.e., in the form of primitive
deities on various vessels made for the storage of water and grain and in toys (Guruchan Singh,
1979). It is one of the most ancient arts that has grown with human civilization. The oldest
literary documents of vedic culture have several references to ceramic pots. References also
have been found in Upanishads about varied forms of terracotta such as bricks, water jars, cups
and jars for storing ghee curd, etc., flower pots, vases and other decorative vases, oil lamps of
various designs and patterns. The eminent historians archaeologists and vedantists commonly
agree that the vedic age is older than the Nile, Rhine, Elbe and Indus Valley civilizations.
However, many historians believe that Egypt is the country in which clay and glass were first
brought together and fused in the fmm of glazed earthernware, making it impervious to liquid.
India, Egypt, Greece, Persia and China are the main countries where pre-dynastic ceramics were
found. (Bist, N.S., 1978). Egyptian ceramic art traveled to south and west European countries
namely, Crete, Sicily, Italy, Spain, France, and Germany whereas Indian art made headway
towards Middle-East countries- Persia and Greece and also to China, Korea and Japan. The
Greek pottery and wares were the best known in the 5th century and the Greek craftsmanship
influenced the Roman art of pottery. The printed pottery was well known in China and they
exported porcelainous ware to Korea, Japan and Islamic countries (Gupta, K.C., 1988).
The art of pottery was very well known to the people of Indus valley civilization (2500
BC). They decorated the earthernwares with the figures of animals similar to that of metal
currency. The archaeological survey and findings indicate the concept of pottery work in India
during 2600 BC- 300 AD (Lothal ofHarappa Civilization- 2326 BC).
Dming the dynastic rule of Gupta, Kushan and Shakas (200 BC to 650 AD) decorative
potterywares were mostly used for social and economic purposes. During the Maurya Period the
idols of Lord Buddha were sent to Tibet, China and Japan. The art of Indian pottery attained
greater peak in the world of pottery works (Cox W.E., The Book of Pottery and Porcelain,
p.113). Different kinds of terracotta idols were made reflecting various forms, appearance and
expressions of Lord Buddha at Aawara and Kausambi situated on the bank of Chambal river and
also at Mansor of Madhya Pradesh and Chandrakgada of Bengal (Menzio Tradder; 1942). The
18
vmious geometrical shapes, human figures animal and bird motifs, flower and leaf, and other
religious symbols were profusely used in decorating the potterywares. However, due to the
imposition of tax on rural community pottery the decorative pottery work lost its charm and
colour dming post-Gupta period.
Again with the arrival of Moughals in India, they brought artisans also along with them
and patronized the art of pottery. They enthused new spirit in art, design shapes and colour of
potteryware as the Islamic religion, culture was alien to Indian Art, Culture and Society. Along
with Chengeezkhan arrived glazed pottery in Punjab and Sindh region. An Arab rich
entrepreneur started producing glazed Chinese pottety products in Hyderabad. An enthusiastic
Rajasthan emperor from Rajasthan invited several potters from Arabian countries to produce
glazed potterywares. Workmanship and red glaze of Chunar produced in Uttar Pradesh and
Tamil Nadu were famous. Black pottery products of Azamgarh and Nizamgadh of Uttar Pradesh
were also famous. Till date, Persian type ofpotterywares are produced in Khurja (U.P.) by using
glazed technique. The most important brickwork and art of sculpture were carried out by Kutub
Udden-Aibak while constructing Kutub-Minar. Fatehpur Sikri and the Fort of Agra represent the
ceramic and sculptural artistic excellence (1206-1227).
Pottery is one of the most ancient and important village industry in India and there is
hardly a village without a potter or 'Kumbhar'. A village artisan employs the traditional
techniques in making large variety of vessels, pots required for domestic and agricultural
purposes. Any locally available plastic clay is used and is sometimes mixed with non-plastic soil
or spent wood ash or cowdung and kneaded by treading. The mixture is passed through bamboo
sieves and allowed to remain for two weeks for souring with kneadings at short intervals. Using
this plastic like clay. Potter gives shape to the article by setting the wheel in motion and his
skills. Vessel is removed from the main clay mass by cutting with a thread or wire for partially
drying in the sun. The final shape is given by beating on a round polished stone with a slab of
wood. Then articles are burnt in crude kilns using locally available fuel.
The industry in the modern sense is of comparatively recent origin. The credit of
establishing modem ceramic unit goes to D.C. Majumdar who produced commercially the fine
earthemwares in Gwalior in the year 1858. The early pottery and stoneware works to
manufacture glazed vitrified articles and salt glazed pipes was established by M/s Bum &
Company at Raniganj in 1860. In the same year the first porcelain factory was started at
Patharghatta in Bhagalpur district of Bihar and ceramic unit at Kolkatta started. The Basel
19
Mission (German) started their first ceramic industry in 1865 at Mangalore (Kamataka)
producing roofing tiles. In 1874, with the support ofHis Highness, Emperor Kasim Bazar, a new
unit- Bengal Pottery, was set up to produce fire bricks. In the early 201h century, there were
hardly half a dozen factmies in the country and the number rose to 25 in 1939 and 66 in 1957
and 125 in 1990. There are three spatial concentrations at the national level. The most important
one is in northern and eastern India covering Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Orissa and West Bengal
accounting for about 44 percent of Indian ceramic units. The second important spatial
concentration is western India covering Maharashtra and Gujarat (about 22 percent and the third
one covering the southern four states - Tamil N adu, Andhra Pradesh, Kama taka and Kerala
accounting for 18 percent of the ceramic units. Other minor pockets includes Delhi, New Delhi,
Chandigarh and states such as Punjab, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, (about 17
percent). These spatial clusters have predominantly the refractories units and other units such as
crockery H.T. Insulators, Sanitarywares, Glazed Tiles, and Ceramic Capacitors and lesser in
number.
Regions/States
Eastern-Northern Region West Bengal Otissa Jharkhand Uttar Pradesh \Vestern Region
Maharashtra Guiarat
Southern Region
Tamil Nadu Andhra Pradesh Kama taka Kerala
Other Minor Regions
Madhya Pradesh Delhi, New Delhi Chandigarh Punjab Haryana Rajasthan 1 ammu & Kashmir
Total
Table 3.1 Spatial Concentrations of Ceramic Units in India
(1990)
Refrac- Sanitary- Glazed Crockery H.T. tories wares Tiles Insula-
tors 41 1 - 6 5
19 - - 3 3 10 1 - 1 -9 - - 1 1 3 - - 1 1 9 4 6 4 1
6 1 4 2 -3
,., 2 2 1 .)
6 5 1 4 4
2 3 - 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 - - - 1 - 1 - 2 -
12 1 3 2 2
2 - - - 1 6 - 1 - -1 - - - -- - - - 1 2 1 1 1 -1 - 1 - -- - - 1 -
68 11 10 16 12
Ceramic Total Capaci-
tors 2 55
(~ - 25 1 13 - 11 1 6 3 27
(21.6) 3 16 - 11 2 22
(17.6) - 8 - 5 1 5 1 4 1 21
(16.8) - 3 - 7 1 2 - 1 - 5 - 2 - 1 8 125
20
However, the most important centres of modem and organized ceramic industries in
these regions are Kolkatta, Mumbai, Thane, Chennai, Gwalior, Khurja, Chunar Nizamabad,
Morbi, Thangadh, Dharwad, Hubli, Mangalore and Bangalore. Gujarat now occupies second
position among the Indian states as far as the ceramic units are concerned. Roofing tiles,
Sanitarywares, Glazed tiles, crockery and pottery, electric porcelain, other ceramic and artware
units together account for 671 industries in Gujarat. With regard to sanitarywares units Gujarat
accounts for 97 percent of the total small scale units and 33 percent of the large scale units of
India (Table 3.2).
States
1. Gujarat
2. Rajasthan
3. Haryana
4.Madhya Pradesh
5. Tamil Nadu
6. Andhra Pradesh
7. Orissa
8. Uttar Pradesh
9. Himachal Pradesh
10. Bihar
Table 3.2
Statewise Distribution of Sanitary units by Scale and Capacity (1999-2000)
No of Total Capa- Number of Total Capa- Total No.of Large City of Small City of SSI Units Sanitarywa Scale Large Units Scale MT/P.a. re Units Units M.T/P.q. Units
7 (3.02) 90,000 (37.50) 225 (96.98) 1,50,000 (62.50) 232 (100) (33.33) (54.54) (83.33) (96.63) (79.73)
2 (11.76) 8,000 (80.00) 15 (88.24) 2,000 (20.00) 17 (100) (9.52) (4.85) (5.55) (1.29) (5.8) 1 (100) 20,000 (1 00) - - 1 (1 00) (4.76) (12.12) (0.34) 1 (1 00) 4,000 (100) - - 1 (1 00) (4.76) (2.42) (0.34)
3 (15 .. 79) 15,000 (87.21) 16 (84.21) 2,200 (12.79) 19 (100) (14.28) (9.09) (5.93) (1.42) (6.53) 4 (100) 18,000 (100) - - 4 (100) (19.05) (10.90) (1.37) 3 (1 00) 10,000 (1 00) - - 3 (100) (14.28) (6.06) (1.03)
- - 9 (100) 225 (100) 9 (100) (3.33) (0.14) (3.09)
- - 3 (100) 150 (100) 3 (100) (1.00) (0.09) (1.03)
- - 1 (100) 300 (100) 1 (100) (0.37) (0.19) (0.34)
Total Capacity MT/P.a.
2,40,000 (1 00) (74.94) 10,000 (3.12) 20,000 (6.24) 4,000 (1.25) 17,200 (5.37) 18,000 (5.62) 10,000 (3.12) 225
(0.07) 150
(0.05) 300
(0.09)
-
---11. Assam - - 1 (100) 360 (100) 1 (100) 360
(0.37) (0.23) (1.03) (0.11) -
Total 21 1,65,000 270 (92.78) 1,55,235 291 320,235 (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)
-
Source: Status Report on Sanitaryware, SISI, Ministry of Industries, Govt. oflndia, Jan. 2000.
21
-
r·. / '-·
\ ......
l
,.
7 0
Fig. 3.1
IN Dl A
INDEX
no. of Unift
L•••• «Ole ~-Small sca!tt
0 1!50 300 450 Km.
These industries are located m 11 districts out of a total of 25 districts of Gujarat.
However, out of 11 districts, 2 districts namely Rajkot (44 percent) and Surendranagar (41
percent) account for 85 percent of the total units of Gujarat (570 units out of 651 ). Within these
two districts, only two places namely Morbi (Rajkot district) and Thangadh (Surendranagar
district) have the concentration of 40 percent and 30 prcent of ceramic units of Gujarat
respectively. Among the types of ceramic industries mentioned above , ceramic tiles and
sanitarywares dominate the industry. Morbi has 3 7 percent of total ceramic units of Gujarat and
22
99 percent of ceramic tiles units of Gujarat. Thangadh has 22 percent of the total ceramic units
of Gujarat and 88 percent of the total sanitaryware industries of Gujarat. Other important
districts having ceramic industries are Sabarkantha, Ahmedabad and Mehsana.
A special study report reveals that Gujarat ranks first in the country with about 270 small
scale sanitary manufacturing units having installed capacity of 1,55,000 million tones (2000).
With the growing population and associated industiial and residential development, the demand
for sanitaryware is on the increase.
Origin of Ceramic Units in Gujarat:
His Highness Waghji the ruler of Morbi was instrumental in establishing first ceramic
industry at Morbi in the year 1912 with the expert assistance of Galaji Mistry who had taken
training in England. In 1924, Parshuram Ganpule started a pottery works in Wankaner. Around
the same time the ruler of Lakhtar wanted to sell of his pottery works located at Thangadh as it
was running in loss. Again it was Parashuram Ganpule who purchased the unit in 1934 in order
to avoid competition. He also acquired another sick unit namely 'Indian Pottery Works'. In 1946
and 1951 the Ex-ruler of Bhavnagar and Dhrangdhara states invited him to start a factory at
Shihor and Dhrangadhra respectively. However, with the early establishment of ceramic units at
Morbi-Wankaner and Thangadh-Wadhwan the two districts namely Rajkot and Surendranagar
emerged as two strong centres of industrial inertia for ceramic units.
Enterprising Parashuram Ganpule established pottery industry from the base. The
following is the chronological order of the establishment and growth of ceramic industries in
Gujarat.
1. Bricks and Mangalore tiles factory at Baroda (1904-05, The Tiles and Pottery Works Co.,
Ltd.). Its subsidiary factory - The Phi nix Pottery and Bricks and Tiles Works, is located at
Bilimora (South Gujarat).
2. The Parashuram Pottery \Vorks Co. Ltd, Morbi (1912)
3. The Tiles and Pottery Works Ltd, Bilimora (1918)
4. Indian Pottery Works, Wankaner ( 1924)
5. Shri Sohrab Dalal Potteries, Thangadh (1934)
6. The Kodiyar Pottery Works, Shihore (Bhavnagar district 1946)
7. The Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. (Chain oflndustries), Dhrangadhra (1952).
23
The Parashuram Pottery Works at Morbi also has other units at Wankaner, Thangadh and
Dhrangadhra. Other works include Gokulbhai Intwala Factory at Bilimora, The Tiles and
Pottery Works Ltd at Vadodara, Ambica Ceramics, Vijapur (Mehsana), Pottery Works at Sant
Road (Panchmahals), Pressed Porcelains Pvt Ltd, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Lustre Ceramics at
Alkapuri (Vadodara).
Growth of Ceramic Industry:
The last decade of 201h Century has witnessed significant growth in the number of small
scale sanitaryware units by 3 times and the production of sanitaryware items by 6 times. There
were only 3 sanitaryware units in the year 1970 and during 1971-75 15 units were established.
This upward trend continued during 1976-80 and 1981-85 with the establishment of 25 and 28
units respectively. However, during 1986 to 1990 the dismal number of only two units were
established. This is mainly because of the focus on consolidation, stabilization and improvement
of quality rather than increasing the number. Again with the new industrial policy of
liberalization and globalization (1991) as many as 152 sanitaryware units were established in
Gujarat (mainly in Thangadh) during 1991-2000.
The small scale unit per annum production of sanitarywares units has increased from 140
million tones per annum to 689 million tones (1970-2000). An increase in the per unit
production is a good response to the increasing demand for sanitarywares in the housing,
institutional or services and industrial sectors (Table 3.3).
Time Period
Up to 1970
1971 -1980
1981 -1990
1991-2000
Total (as on 2000)
Table 3.3
Growth of Small Scale Sanitarv Units in Gujarat
(1970-2000)
Increase in the Cumulative Production Per number of SSI units Growth Annum (Million of Sanitary wares Tonnes)
3 3 3120
40 43 5000
30 73 25800
152 225 155000
225
Source: Status Reeort on Sanitaryware SISI Ministry oflndustries Govt. of India Jan. 2000.
Per Unit Produdction
140~ 116.3
353.4 --
688.89
24
Fig. 3.2 and 3.3 --------------------------
J!l ~ 't5
~
j ~ ~
§ .5 6
J
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Cumulative Growth of Small Scale Senitary Units In Gujarat
{1970 to 2000)
,....----
r---
....--
Up to 1970 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000
Time Period
Total Annual Sanitaryware Production (In 000' Million Tonnes) of Small
Scale Units in Gujarat (1970 to 2000)
180
160 -140
120
100
80
60
40
20 n ~ r----1 0 -
Up to 1970 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000
Time Period
25
Out of 730 ceramic units of Gujarat, 43 percent units are in Rajkot district and another 43
percent are located in Surendranagar district (i.e. together 86 percent of the total ceramic units of
Gujarat). However, within the districts, Morbi accounts for 37.33 percent and Thangadh 36.99
percent (together 74 percent), out of 86 percent of these districts. This shows a very high degree
of concentration not only within the state but also within the districts (Table 3.4)
Location & Artware Districts
Morbi -
Wankaner -
Rajkot -District
Table 3.4
Distribution of Ceramic Industries in Gujarat- 2000
(By Location and Districts)
Crockery Electrical Glazed Other Roofing & Pottery & Tile Ceramic Tile
Porcelain
- - 20 (7.33) - 249 (89.38) 25.97 95.40
2 (8.70) - 8 (34.78) - II (47.83) 2.94 10.39 4.2I
- - 12(75.00) 3 (18.75) -
I5.58 I0.34
Sanitary Total ware
4 (1.47) 273 1.72 37.39
2 (8.70) 23 (100) 0.86 3.I5
I (6.25) 16 0.43 2.I9
Thangadh I4 (5.I9) 8 (2.96) 17 (6.30) 7 (2.59) - - 224 (82.96) 270 (101)) (100) 11.76 34.69 9.09 96.55 36.99
Wadhwan - 5 (12.20) I0(24.40) - 26(63.4I) - - 41 (100)
7.35 20.41 89.65 5.62
Surendra- - - 2 (33.33) 3 (50.00) - I (I6.67) - 6(IOO) nagar 4.08 3.90 0.38 0.82 District
Ahmedabad - 32(68.08) 1 0(2I.28) 5 (10.64) - - - 47(IOO) District 47.06 20.41 6.49 6.44
Mehsana - 4 (22.22) 3 (16.66) I0(55.55) - - 1 (5.55) 18 (100) District 5.88 6.I2 I2.99 0.43 2.47
Himmat- - I5(78.95) 2 (10.53) 2 (10.53) - - - I9 (100 nagar 22.06 4.08 2.60 2.60
Sabarkan- - 2 (50.00) - 2 (50.00) - - - 4 (100) tha District 2.94 2.60 0.55
Kachchh - - - 2 (100) - - - 2 (100) District 2.60 0.27
-Junagadh - - - 1 (1 00) - - - 1 (1 00) District 1.30 0.14
Vadodara - - 2 (50.00) 2 (50.00) - - - 4 (100) District 4.08 2.60 0.55
Anand - - 3 (100) - - - - 3 (100) District 6.12 0.4I
Bharnch - - - 2 (100) - - - 2 (IOO) District 2.60 0.27
Surat - - - 1 (1 00) - - - 1 (1 00) District 1.30 O.I4
i Total 14 (1.92) 68 (9.32) 49 (6.71) 77(10.55) 29 (3.97) 261 (35.75) 232 (31.78) 730 (100) Source: lndext-B, Gandhinagar
26
·' I I
I
' I
..
..
;
!
0
i!
}
\
I I iO !01
~~
t,. ....... --, ........ \,.. .... - J '
.~
\
I I
' '
c / j
"--. (
Fig. 3.4
l' ' ) .)
{.1 .
/ f " ... (l t' f '-: .. :~ . ../ .. - \ ~
_, ' (.l
(
' I - r.;!"
< -' - ~ '---"'-'\.o~-.1 ....
(
\ '-.
c' ~~ I i -.'>
'
'
/': I r-
(
E
"' 0 0
.... d a: ct ..., :::> C>
~·~
-z" > > " r- .J'
'\.
(/) liJ 0:: .... (/)
:::> 0 z
u~o ::e ct~ ct LIJ -0::)-liJ uo 1.&..0 oo
N z-0 .... :::> Ill
0:: .... (/)
0 001 <D
Thangadh has the very high concentration of (97 percent) sanitaryware and Artware
( 100 percent) units of Gujarat and Morbi has 95 percent concentration of Roofing tiles units of
Gujarat. The other ceramic industries producing crockery, pottery, electrical and porcelain
products also show relatively high concentration. 47 percent of crockeries and pottery units are
localized in Ahmedabad and around and 22 percent of the total units in Himmatnagar (North
Gujarat). Similarly, 35 percent of the electrical and porcelain units in Thangadh and 20 percent
units each in Wadhwan and Ahmedabad are concentrated. The Glazed Tiles industry is the only
27
type of ceramic industry which shows greater spatial spread of dispersal. However, 52 percent of
the units are located in Rajkot district with 26 percent units in Morbi alone (Table 3.4). Despite
this locational inertia the glazed tiles units are located in all the 11 districts of Gujarat where
ceramic industry is rooted in one or the other way.
The values of the location quotient show a higher concentration of 'other ceramic
products' -Laboratory equipments, toys, etc. (15.97) in Wadhwan followed by electrical and
porcelain units in Anand district (14.90). Nearly 90 percent of the total units (26 out of 41) of
other ceramics are located in Wadhwan. Therefore, LQ shows high concentration. Anand district
has only 3 units and all 3 are producing electrical and porcelain items. For crockery and pottery
units Himmatnagar (Sabarkantha district of North Gujarat) and Ahmedabad show locational
inertia but for two different reasons. First one is for the availability and access to raw material
and the second one is for large, accessible market. The only place for the production of artware
items is Thangadh having 14 units. Though in terms of number and percentage, Rajkot district
has 52 percent of the glazed tile units the location quotient is high in case of South Gujarat
(Surat district 9.48, Bharuch district 9.48) and Kathiawad (Junagadh 9.48) and Kachchh (9.48).
These districts have only 1 or 2 units of glazed tiles (Table.3.4).
Table 3.5
Location Quotient
Location Artware Crockery Electrical Glazed Other Roofing Sanitary j & Districts & & Tile Ceramic Tile ware J
Pottery Porcelain Morbi - - - 0.69 - 2.50 0.05 i Wankaner - 0.93 - 3.30 - 1.34 0.27 i
I
Rajkot District - - - 7.11 4.72 - 0.20 I Thangadh 2.70 0.32 0.94 0.25 2.61 I - - I
Wadhwan 1.31 3.64 15.97 I - - - - J
Surendranagar District - - 3.48 4.74 - 0.47 - i Ahmedabad District - 7.30 3.71 1.01 - - - I Mehsana District - 2.38 2.48 5.27 - - 0.17 :
: Himmatnagar - 8.47 1.57 0.99 - - - I
Sabarkantha District - 5.36 - 4.74 - - -Kachchh District - - - 9.48 - - -Junagadh District - - - 9.48 - - - -1 Vadodara District - - 7.45 4.74 - - -Anand District - - 14.90 - - - -Bharuch District - - - 9.48 - - -Surat District - - - 9.48 - - -
I Source: Indext-B, Gandhinar
28
L.Q. = Pij 1 Pi Where PiJ. =Number of ceramic industries inJ·-th type of location/area i
Pj!P
Pi = Total ceramic industries of all types of location I area i
Pj = Sum of industries of type j in all the locations I areas
P = Total ceramic industries of all the locations I area in each type.
Morbi shows high LQ of 2.50 for Roofing tiles and Thangadh 2.61 for sanitarywares
indicating the locational concentration of the industries.
Table 3.6 is based on the census of small scale industrial units of Gujarat carried out by
the Industries Commissionerate (2005). It includes the information about small scale ceramic
units which are registered. Although ceramic, porcelain and pottery units are predominant in
number (52 percent) and also account for 26 percent of the Gross Domestic Product, the ratio of
units to GDP works out to be 1 : 0.5. the comparable ratio for ceramic tiles and roofing tiles
units is 2.04 and 2.01 respectively. However, the per capita Gross Domestic Product is high
(Rs.1.98 lakh per annum) in case of ceramics, porcelain and pottery articles and ceramic tiles
(Rs.1.94 lakhs) compared to other units mentioned in the Table 3 .6.
Table 3.6
Number of Registered SSI Units by Ceramic Type- 2004
Ceramic Type No.ofUnits Gross Domestic Employment Product (Rs.Lakhs)
1. Ceramic/ Porcelain/ 962 (52.06) 4017.00 (25.83) 2026 (19.51) Pottery Articles
2. Sanitaryware I Porcelain 146 (7.90) 1787.91 (11.50) 1157(11.14)
3. Ceramic Tiles 179 (9.69) 3074.00 (19.77) 1584 (15.26) 4. Flooring Tiles 272 (14.72) 2935.49 (18.88) 2593 (24.98) 5. Roofing Tiles 125 (6.76) 2114.19 (13.59) 1702 (16.39) 6. Wash Basins,
FibreGlass 164 (8.87) 1623.54 (10.44) 1320 (12.71) Total 1848 (100) 15,552.13 (100) 10,382 (100)
Source: Industries Commissionerate, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, 2005 _j
The flooring tiles units provide more employment whereas roofing tiles unit is more
labour intensive (per unit employment is 13.62). The per unit GOP is also relatively high in case
of roofing tile units (Rs.16.91 lakhs) next only to ceramic tile units (Rs.17.17 lakhs.).
29
Ceramic Type
1. Ceramic/ Porcelain/ Pottery Articles
2. Sanitaryware I Porcelain
3. Ceramic Tiles 4. Flooring Tiles 5. Roofing Tiles 6. Wash Basins,
FibreGlass Total
Table 3.7
Per Unit GDP Employment and Per capita GDP (2004)
Per Unit Employment Per Unit GDP (Rs.Lakhs)
2.11 4.18
7.92 12.25 8.85 17.17 9.53 10.79 13.62 16.91
8.05 9.90 5.62 8.42
Per capita GDP (Rs. Lakhs)
1.98
1.55 1.94 1.13 1.24
1.23 1.50
Source: Industries Commissionerate, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, 2005
There is greater inconsistency and paucity of comparable secondary data. Some attempt
has been made to analyse the spatial spread of some types of ceramic units based on the
available census data of small scale industrial units. Rajkot district and Morbi in particular have
the concentration of roofing tiles and flooring tiles whereas Surendranagar district and Thangadh
in particular continue to maintain the monopoly in the production of wash basins and fibre glass.
\Vith regard to the production of ceramic-porcelain and pottery articles two centres emerge as
more significant. Sabarkantha district with Himmatnagar centre account for 47 percent units and
Ahmedabad and around account for another 40 percent of the total units of Gujarat. The
remaining 13 percent of the units are located in Rajkot, Surendranagar, Mehsana district (Tables
3.8 and 3.4).
Table 3.8
Some Spatial Pattern of Selected Ceramic Types (2004)
Ceramic Type District No.of Fixed Gross Output Employment Units Investment (Rs. In Lakhs) (Rs. In Lakhs)
1. Ceramic I Sabarkantha 448 297.79 494.66 735 Porcelain I Ahmedabad 389 460.49 1808.58 792 Pottery Articles Other District 125 N.A. 1713.76 499
2. Flooring Tiles Rajkot 183 2223.37 1918.66 1749 Other District 89 N.A. 1016.83 849
3. Roofing Tiles Rajkot 116 1905.05 2013.46 1588 Other District 09 N.A. 100.73 114
-· 4. Wash Basins, Surendranagar 161 2853.73 1613.61 1291
Fibre Glass Other District 03 N.A. 9.93 29 Total 1523 10,690.22 7646
Source: Industries Commissionerate, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, 2005
30
I
Thus, the ceramic and pottery industry of Gujarat has come a long way from its early
Indus Valley Civilization to the most modem times by adopting advanced technologies,
machineries methods processes, inventions, designs and colours at various stages of production
and raw material handling including the marketing of the products. The modem high tech
ceramic industry has grown steadily over a long time from a traditional village based pottery and
earthern ware works producing mainly the household requirements such as jars of varied sizes to
store water foodgrains and also bricks and roofing tiles (adobe). Village potter with his
traditional equipments and skills supplied these basic materials to the village community.
Traditional bricks were dried (in the open) by the sun. The industry with more than 5000 years
of history has evolved from pottery into a most modem ceramic industry with its product
diversification, design, appearance, quality, appeal, utility, applicability and durability. Today,
industry produces a wide range of products such as tiles, mosaic tiles, wall tiles, ceramic tiles.
vitrified tiles, sanitarywares like wash basins, sinks, closets, urinals, bathing tubs, etc. Crockery,
electrical ceramic capacitors, transformer bushings, lightening arrestors, shells, sewer pipes and
ornamental ceramics such as beads, jewellery etc.
Thus, the modem ceramic industry which started in Gujarat and Saurashtra in the early
part of 20th century, is mainly due to the patronage of royal family of Baroda, Bhavnagar,
Rajkot, Morbi, Sihore, Dhrangadhra, Wankaner, Wadhwan, Thangadh and other places include
Vijapur, Sant Road, Vallabh Vidyanagar and Bilimora.
'l1 Jl