ospi changes and priorities january 2009. ospi agency priorities and organization chart
TRANSCRIPT
OSPI CHANGESAND PRIORITIES
January 2009
OSPI agency prioritiesand organization chart
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 3
Superintendent Dorn’sfive budget and policy priorities
Fund the Basic Education Funding Task Force recommendations
Replace the Washington Assessment of Student Learning
Dramatically reduce the dropout rate and improve achievement for all students
Expand career and technical educational opportunities
Expand early learning opportunities
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 4
Superintendent of Public InstructionJanuary 2009
Randy DornSuperintendent(360) 725-6000
Ken KanikebergChief of Staff
Special Programs &
Federal AccountabilityBob Harmon
Assessment & Student
InformationJoe Willhoft
Teaching & Learning
Financial Resources
Jennifer Priddy
InformationTechnology
ServicesPeter Tamayo
District & School Improv.
& Accnt.Janell
Newman
StudentSupportMartinMueller
Alan BurkeDeputy Superintendent
K-12 Education
Robert HarkinsDeputy Superintendent
Communications and External Relations
Governmental Relations
Communications and Community
Outreach
Agency Support
Equity
Public Policy & PlanningBob Butts
ProfessionalEducation & Certification
Career & College
ReadinessKathleen Lopp
Human Resources
Claris Nnanabu
DRAFT
Assessment history and OSPI responsibilities
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 6
OSPI assessment responsibilities
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 7
OSPI assessment responsibilities
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 8
OSPI Assessment Responsibilities
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 9
OSPI Assessment Responsibilities
The future of assessment
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 11
The new “Washington Comprehensive Assessment Program”: six goals
1. Shorten the tests2. Reduce the amount of time students spend
on written responses3. Return scores more quickly4. Increase the use of technology5. Provide more diagnostic information to
teachers/parents6. Minimize costs
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 12
Washington Comprehensive Assessment ProgramMeasurements of student progress: READING
Spring 2009
Administer WASLas planned
Spring 2010
Shortened passages
Fewer constructed response items
Begin computer testing in 3-8
Single-session testing; late Spring window
Spring 2012Spring 2011
Expand computer testing; add HS
Computer testing fall tests in 3-8
Statewide computer testing
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 13
Washington Comprehensive Assessment ProgramMeasurements of student progress: MATH
Spring 2009
Administer WASLas planned
Spring 2010
Add completion items
Fewer constructed response items
Begin computer testing in 3-8
Single-session testing; late Spring window
Spring 2012Spring 2011
Expand computer testing; Add HS E-of-C
Computer testing Fall tests in 3-8
Statewide computer testing
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 14
Washington Comprehensive Assessment ProgramMeasurements of student progress: WRITING
Spring 2009
Administer WASLas planned
Explore computer scoring
Spring 2010
Possible shortened test
Possible computer scoring
Late Spring window
Spring 2012Spring 2011
Computer practice writing testsin 3-8, HS
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 15
Washington Comprehensive Assessment ProgramMeasurements of student progress: SCIENCE
Spring 2009
Administer WASLas planned
Spring 2010
Less constructed response items
Begin computer testing in 5 & 8
5 & 8 testing takes one session only
Late Spring window
Spring 2012Spring 2011
Expand computer testing; Add HS
Statewide computer testing
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 16
New math and science standards
Tests for Grades 3 through 8 will measure the new mathematics standards in 2010
Tests for Grades 5 and 8 will measure the new science standards in 2011
High school math and science tests measure the new math and science standards in 2011
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 17
Math and sciencegraduation requirements
Superintendent will request that graduation requirements be delayed
State Board needs to determine “valid and reliable” criteria
Earning additional math credits stays in place
Last year for HS Math WASL to be 2010; current law calls for 2013 (legislation pending)
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 18
High school math end-of-course exams
Four end-of-course exams will be implemented in 2011: Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated 1 and Integrated 2
Last year for current WASL would be 2010 A “core math” test measuring 1st and 2nd
year HS math will be available as graduation alternative starting in 2011
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 19
New high school mathematics “performance expectations” (PEs) arranged by course
Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Duplicates Total
Alg I 32 7 2 (-1) 40
Geom 9 23 14 (-3) 43
Alg II 1 13 26 (-4) 36
Total 42 43 42 (-8) 119
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 20
New high school mathematics “performance expectations” (PEs) arranged by course
Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Duplicates Total
Alg I 32 7 2 (-1) 40
Geom 9 23 14 (-3) 43
Alg II 1 13 26 (-4) 36
Total 42 43 42 (-8) 119
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 21
New high school mathematics “performance expectations” (PEs) arranged by course
Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Duplicates Total
Alg I 32 7 2 (-1) 40
Geom 9 23 14 (-3) 43
Alg II 1 13 26 (-4) 36
Total 42 43 42 (-8) 119
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 22
New high school mathematics “performance expectations” (PEs) arranged by course
Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Duplicates Total
Alg I 32 7 2 (-1) 40
Geom 9 23 14 (-3) 43
Alg II 1 13 26 (-4) 36
Total 42 43 42 (-8) 119
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 23
New high school mathematics “performance expectations” (PEs) arranged by course
Int 1 Int 2 Int 3 Duplicates Total
Alg I 32 7 2 (-1) 40
Geom 9 23 14 (-3) 43
Alg II 1 13 26 (-4) 36
Total 42 43 42 (-8) 119
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 24
Computerized testing
Computer delivered tests an option in 2010; evaluation of infrastructure
Computerized testing expanded in 2011, with fall and spring testing in grades 3-8
Goal: Statewide computerized testing in 2012 Paper-and-pencil remains an accommodation and an
option Capturing responses via computer supports constructed
responses; will explore computerized scoring Current contractors have proven track record Growth scores available from fall-to-spring OSPI is exploring fiscal impacts of computerized scoring
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 25
Expanded support for classrooms
Will move aggressively to provide classroom teachers with support throughout the year
Will be online tools (screening and progress monitoring)
Will be two testing opportunities Spring accountability test moved to later in
the year Districts will spend far fewer resources to
distribute, secure and collect testing materials
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 26
Other testing issues
Translations Budget required cutback to translate Math/Science
into 6 languages to 2 languages (Spanish/Russian) Will work to re-instate full six-language plan
Modified tests for students with disabilities Legislature did not fund “modified” (or 2% test)
state test (WAAS-Portfolio is 1% test)
Will seek funding for this population ELL Testing
Will work toward better alignment between MSP and English language proficiency test (WLPT-II)
Instructional materials review
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 28
Math instructional materialsreview process overview
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 29
Math instructional materialsreview process overview, cont’d
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 30
Category weights
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 31
K-8 Instructional Materials Review Committee Members – June 2008
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 32
Materials Review Week – the library
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 33
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
Elementary Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals
Elementary school composite scores with95% confidence intervals
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 34
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Middle School Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals
Middle school composite scores with95% confidence intervals
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 35
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
Algebra Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals
Algebra composite scores with95% confidence intervals
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 36
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
Geometry Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals
Geometry composite scores with95% confidence intervals
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 37
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
Core Plus Math SIMMS Math Interactive Math Program
Integrated Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals, Treated as Individual Courses
Integrated composite scores with 95% confidence intervals, treated as individual courses
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 38
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
Core Plus Math SIMMS Math Interactive Math Program
Integrated Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals, Treated as a Series
Integrated composite scores with 95% confidence intervals, treated as a series
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 39
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
Traditional ▲ and Integrated ■Publisher Bundle Composite Scores with 95% Confidence Intervals
Traditional and Integrated publisher bundle composite scores with 95% confidence intervals
Traditional
Integrated
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 40
Math curriculum materials review summary
Strength of field is impressive in Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II
Integrated high school programs will need significant supplements
All K-8 programs will need supplements OSPI is working on supplemental materials
review and “birds-of-feather” collaboration
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES | SLIDE 41
Superintendent Dorn’sfive budget and policy priorities
Fund the Basic Education Funding Task Force recommendations
Replace the Washington Assessment of Student Learning
Dramatically reduce the dropout rate and improve achievement for all students
Expand career and technical educational opportunities
Expand early learning opportunities
Thank you for your support!