oss-308_2008-10

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10

1/46

OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATION

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV-OSS-308

VERIFICATION OF

LIFTING APPLIANCES FOR THEOIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

JUNE 2005

Since issued in print (June 2005), this booklet has been amended, latest in October 2008.

See the reference to Amendments and Corrections on the next page.

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10

2/46

Comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] subscription orders or information about subscription terms, please use [email protected] information about DNV services, research and publications can be found at http://www.dnv.com, or can be obtained from DNV,Veritasveien 1, NO-1322 Hvik, Norway; Tel +47 67 57 99 00, Fax +47 67 57 99 11.

Det Norske Veritas. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, includingphotocopying and recording, without the prior written consent of Det Norske Veritas.

Computer Typesetting (FM+SGML) by Det Norske Veritas.Printed in Norway.

If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of Det Norske Veritas, then Det Norske Veritas shall pay compensation to such personfor his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compen-sation shall never exceed USD 2 million.In this provision "Det Norske Veritas" shall mean the Foundation Det Norske Veritas as well as all its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of DetNorske Veritas.

FOREWORD

DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV) is an autonomous and independent foundation with the objectives of safeguarding life, prop-erty and the environment, at sea and onshore. DNV undertakes classification, certification, and other verification and consultancyservices relating to quality of ships, offshore units and installations, and onshore industries worldwide, and carries out researchin relation to these functions.

DNV Offshore Codes consist of a three level hierarchy of documents:

Offshore Service Specifications. Provide principles and procedures of DNV classification, certification, verification and con-

sultancy services. Offshore Standards. Provide technical provisions and acceptance criteria for general use by the offshore industry as well asthe technical basis for DNV offshore services.

Recommended Practices. Provide proven technology and sound engineering practice as well as guidance for the higher levelOffshore Service Specifications and Offshore Standards.

DNV Offshore Codes are offered within the following areas:

A) Qualification, Quality and Safety Methodology

B) Materials Technology

C) Structures

D) Systems

E) Special Facilities

F) Pipelines and Risers

G) Asset OperationH) Marine Operations

J) Wind Turbines

O) Subsea Systems

Amendments and Corrections

This document is valid until superseded by a new revision. Minor amendments and corrections will be published in a separatedocument normally updated twice per year (April and October).

For a complete listing of the changes, see the Amendments and Corrections document located at:http://webshop.dnv.com/global/, under category Offshore Codes.

The electronic web-versions of the DNV Offshore Codes will be regularly updated to include these amendments and corrections.

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10

3/46DET NORSKE VERITAS

Offshore Service Specification DNV-OSS-308, June 2005

Introduction Page 3

INTRODUCTION

This Service Specification was approved by the Director ofTechnology in April 2005.

The suit of inter-related DNV-OSS documents consist of a

general description of the verification systematics (DNV-OSS-300) and object specific documents - this document (DNV-OSS-308) offers the reader the application of the commonframework and overview of processes in risk verification, tocranes.

It introduces a levelled description of verification involve-

ment during all phases of an asset's life.

The document facilitates a categorisation into risk levelsHigh, Medium and Low, assisting in an evaluation of therisk level.

The document assists in planning the verification throughthe making of a Verification Plan, and describes the DNVdocumentation of the process throughout.

The document provides an international standard allowingtransparent and predictable verification scope, as well as defin-ing terminology for verification involvement.

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10


Offshore Service Specification DNV-OSS-308, June 2005

Page 4 Introduction

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10


Amended October 2008 Offshore Service Specification DNV-OSS-308, June 2005

see note on front cover Contents Page 5

CONTENTS

Sec. 1 General .................................................................. 7

A. General....................................................................................7

A 100 Introduction.......................................................................7

A 200 Objectives .........................................................................7

A 300 Scope of application for verification ................................7

A 400 Structure of this document ...............................................7

B. Risk Based Verification..........................................................8

B 100 Elements of the service.....................................................8

C. Defining a Verification Plan...................................................8

C 100 Risk based verification planning.......................................8

D. DNV Lifting Reports and Certificates....................................8

D 100 General on verification .....................................................8

D 200 General on certification ....................................................8

D 300 DNV Certificate of Lifting Appliance..............................8

E. Definitions / Abbreviations ....................................................8

E 100 General..............................................................................8

E 200 Abbreviations .................................................................... 8

E 300 Verbal Forms ....................................................................8

E 400 Definitions ........................................................................9

E 500 References.......................................................................10

Sec. 2 Service Overview ................................................ 11

A. General..................................................................................11

A 100 Objectives .......................................................................11

B. Service Process.....................................................................11

B 100 General principles...........................................................11

B 200 Simplified verification planning.....................................11

B 300 Selection of level of verification.....................................11

B 400 Codes, standards and reference documents ....................11

C. Project Initiation ...................................................................11

C 100 Verification during conceptual design...........................11

D. Project Realization................................................................ 12

D 100 General............................................................................12

D 200 Verification of overall project management...................12

D 300 Verification during design .............................................. 12

D 400 Verification during construction andfactory acceptance test....................................................13

D 500 Verification during installation and

commisioning ................................................................. 14D 600 Verification at issuance of Certificate of

Lifting Appliance............................................................14

E. Verification Documents........................................................15

E 100 General............................................................................15

App. A Selection of Verification Level........................... 16

A. General..................................................................................16

A 100 General principles...........................................................16

B. Trigger Questions .................................................................16

B 100 Overall Project Objective and Goals ..............................16

B 200 Assessment of risk ..........................................................16

B 300 Technical innovation.......................................................16B 400 Contractors experience ..................................................16

B 500 Quality management systems .........................................16

B 600 Simplified assessment and verification level..................17

App. B Detailed Example Scope of Work Tables forVerification ......................................................... 18

A. General..................................................................................18A 100 General introduction ...................................................... 18

B. Description of Terms Used in the Scope of Work Tables ....18B 100 General............................................................................18B 200 Audit...............................................................................18B 300 Surveillance ....................................................................18B 400 Review ............................................................................18

C. Overall Project Management ................................................19C 100 General............................................................................19

D. Design ...................................................................................19D 100 General............................................................................19D 200 Verification during design..............................................19D 300 Low level design verification .........................................19D 400 Medium level design verification ..................................19D 500 High level design verification.........................................19

E. Construction and Factory Acceptance Test (FAT)...............24E 100 General............................................................................ 24E 200 Construction and FAT verification.................................24E 300 Low level construction and FAT verification................. 24E 400 Medium level construction and FAT verification ..........24E 500 High level construction verification ...............................24

F. Installation and Commissioning...........................................28F 100 General............................................................................28

F 200 Verification during installation and commissioning....... 28F 300 Low level installation and commissioning verification.. 28

F 400 Medium level construction verification.......................... 29F 500 High level construction verification ...............................29

App. C Examples of Verification Documents ............... 35

A. Verification Documents........................................................35A 100 Validity of verification documents................................. 35A 200 Certificate of lifting appliance .......................................35A 300 Verification reports......................................................... 35

A 400 Verification comments ...................................................35A 500 Audit report.....................................................................35

A 600 Visit reports ....................................................................36

B. Use of Quality Management Systems ..................................36B 100 General............................................................................36

B 200 Quality plans................................................................... 36B 300 Inspection and test plans.................................................36B 400 Review of quality management programme...................36

C. Document Forms ..................................................................37C 100 Introduction..................................................................... 37

C 200 Certificate of lifting appliance........................................38C 300 Verification comments sheet ..........................................40

C 400 Audit report.....................................................................41C 500 Visit report......................................................................43

App. D Lifting Appliance Life Cycle ............................. 44

A. ..............................................................................................44

App. E Informative Documents ..................................... 45

A. Technical Terminology.........................................................45

B. Guide for Selection of Verification Level ............................45

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10


Offshore Service Specification DNV-OSS-308, June 2005 Amended October 2008

Page 6 Contents see note on front cover

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



see note on front cover Sec.1 Page 7

SECTION 1GENERAL

A. General

A 100 Introduction101 This DNV Offshore Service Specification (DNV-OSS-308) gives criteria for and guidance on verification of liftingappliances for the oil and gas industry within the EuropeanEconomic Area (EEA).

102 This specification falls under the top level documentDNV-OSS-300 Risk Based verification.

103 The descriptions in this specification directly support asimplified verification planning as described in Section 2 F ofDNV-OSS-300. When using the advanced or combined plan-ning, the descriptions will give good references and starting

points.

Guidance note:

The latest revision of all DNV documents may be found in thepublications list in the DNV web site www.dnv.com.

---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---

A 200 Objectives

201 The objectives of this specification are to describe thefollowing for a lifting appliance:

preparation of a Verification Plan using DNVs risk differ-entiated levels of verification activities and detailed exam-

ple scope of work tables DNVs implementation and reporting of the Verification

Plan

A 300 Scope of application for verification

301 This specification may be adopted for the verification oflifting appliances throughout the project phases conceptualdesign, detailed design, construction, installation and commis-sioning.

302 Lifting appliances for offshore applications typicallycomprise the following objects:

Cranes:

mobile cranes tower cranes slewing jib cranes bridge and gantry cranes offshore cranes

floating cranes winches and hoists loader cranes cable cranes hand powered cranes.

Lifting accessories:

chain slings fibre slings wire rope slings spreader beams lifting magnets vacuum lifters lifting forks trollies beam clamps hooks blocks shackles other loose gear.

Lifting appliances for life saving equipment:

life boat winches rescue boat davits davits for life rafts lifting appliances for rescue chutes stretchers lifting capsules medical baskets.

Lifting person devices:

lifting tables mobile elevating work platforms personnel baskets manrider winches access platforms case stabbing baskets cherry pickers climbing platforms.

Drilling hoisting equipment:

draw work ram rigs BOP cranes pipe handling cranes swivels crown block travelling block dead line anchor.

Robots:

manipulator arms manually controlled load manipulating devices production lines.

which are applied in various configurations and tailored toeach particular projects specific requirements.

303 This specification describes the principles of a levelledverification involvement. These principles may be applied

both for planning of any need or obligations for independentexternal verification (third party) as well as internal companyverification (second party).

A 400 Structure of this document

Section 1 explains the relationship between this document andDNVs overall risk based verification systematics.

Section 2 describes the activities for each project and theproject phases for lifting appliances for offshore applications.

Appendix A poses trigger questions to assist in the selectionof verification level

Appendix B gives detailed example scope of work tables forthe different phases and levels of involvement. These tablesare the basis for the development of project specific scope ofwork tables.

Appendix C gives example verification documents and

describes the documents issued during and as a result of theverification process. The use of quality management systemsis addressed here also.

Appendix D is a separate appendix for lifting applianceswhich includes figures for information.

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



Page 8 Sec.1 see note on front cover

B. Risk Based Verification

B 100 Elements of the service

101 The risk based verification concept is described inDNV-OSS-300 and shown in Figure 1.

102 The Verification Plan is the pivot element, with theAsset Specification, Risk Assessment and Definition of

Involvement Level as input and the Verification Executionbeing the implementation.

Figure 1The DNV Risk Based Verification Flow Chart

C. Defining a Verification Plan

C 100 Risk based verification planning

101 The selection of the level of verification shall depend onthe risk level of each of the elements that have an impact on themanagement of hazards and associated risk levels of the asset.The planning can be simplified or detailed. This is furtherdescribed in DNV-OSS-300.

102 This specification mainly aids in a simplified prepara-tion of the Verification Plan.

D. DNV Lifting Reports and Certificates

D 100 General on verification

101 Verification describes the individual activities under-taken by DNV at the various stages of design, construction andoperation of the facility. The scope of the verification plan isultimately determined by the Client. A statement of Compli-ance may be issued by DNV to confirm compliance accordingto the scope of work.

D 200 General on certification

201 Certification describes the totality of verification activi-ties leading up to the issue of a Certificate of Conformity. Thescope of work and verification plan, called a Certification Plan,is set by DNV. All design and construction aspects, related to

process facility safety and integrity, must be covered by theCertification Plan.

D 300 DNV Certificate of Lifting Appliance

301 In the event that DNV does not define the scope of worknecessary to achieve certification, a certificate of LiftingAppliance shall not be issued.

E. Definitions / Abbreviations

E 100 General

101 Relevant definitions in ISO also apply to this OSS.

E 200 Abbreviations

ISO International Standardisation OrganisationILO International Labour OrganisationCEN European Standardisation OrganisationDNV Det Norske VeritasFAT Factory Acceptance Test

NB Notified BodyCE Communaut EuropenneEMC Electromagnetic CompatibilityFE Finite Element AnalysisFLS Fatigue Limit StateHAZID Hazard IdentificationHAZOP Hazard and Operability ReviewOS DNV Offshore StandardOSS DNV Offshore Service SpecificationMPQT Manufacturing Procedure Qualification TestMPS Manufacturing Procedure Specification

NDE Non-destructive ExaminationQRA Quantitative Risk AnalysisRP Recommended PracticeSCF Stress Concentration FactorSHE Safety, Health, EnvironmentTCF Technical Construction FileULS Ultimate Limit StateWPS Welding Procedure SpecificationsWPQR Welding Procedure Qualification RecordEEA European Economic Area (EU and EFTA coun-

tries)

E 300 Verbal Forms

301 Shall: Indicates requirements strictly to be followedin order to conform to this OSS and from which no deviationis permitted.

302 Should: Indicates that among several possibilities,one is recommended as particularly suitable, without mention-

ing or excluding others, or that a certain course of action is pre-ferred but not necessarily required. Other possibilities may beapplied subject to agreement.

303 May: Verbal form used to indicate a course of actionpermissible within the limits of the OSS.

Asset Planned

Risk Assessment

including identification of hazards and ranking ofhazards based on risk evaluation

Verification planincluding list of verification activities

Verification Execution

including reporting of compliance or non-compliance

Asset Completed

Asset Specificationincluding overall Company Acceptance Criteria and

Verification Objectives

Definition of Verification Involvementincluding detailing of acceptance criteria

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




E 400 Definitions

401 Client: DNVs contractual partner. It may be the Manu-facturer, Purchaser, Operator (User), the Owner or the Con-tractor.

402 Construction: All activities during purchase, manufac-turing, assembly, and erection at the manufacturers site. untilthe lifting appliance is ready factory acceptance test.

403 Factory Acceptance Test (FAT): Final testing at themanufacturers site prior to shipment.

404 Design: Engineering activities related to planning andpreparation of the technical documentation of a lifting appli-ance and its components to enable its construction.

405 Installation: Activities related to the assembly and erec-tion of the lifting appliance on the working location.

406 Commissioning: Activity after installation, includingreview, survey and testing in the presence of the Client in orderto assess compliance with the requirements.

407 Decommissioning: Activity to bring a lifting applianceout of operation after it has served its purpose.

408 Removal: De-install the lifting appliance from its oper-ating location.

409 Hazard: A deviation (departure from the design andoperating intention) which could cause damage, injury or otherform of loss (Chemical Industries Association HAZOPGuide).

410 HAZOP: The application of a formal systematic criticalexamination to the process and engineering intentions of newor existing facilities to assess the hazard potential of mal-oper-ation or mal-function of individual items of equipment andtheir consequential effects on the facility as a whole (ChemicalIndustries Association HAZOP Guide).

411 Manufacture: Making of articles or materials, often inlarge volumes. In relation to process facilities, this typicallyrefers to activities for the production of various componentsunder contracts from one or more Contractor or Supplier.

412 Operations (phase): The phase when the lifting appli-ance is being used for the purpose for which it was designed.Use includes start-up, stopping, transport, operation, monitor-ing, inspection, repair, maintenance, service and cleaning.

413 Lifting appliance: Machine or deviceused for the pur-pose of vertical movement of a load with or without horizontalmovement.

414 Crane: Machine for cyclic lifting or cyclic lifting andhandling of loads suspended on hooks or other load handlingdevices, whether manufactured to an individual design, in

series or from prefabricated components.

Guidance note:

Suspended can include additional means fitted to preventswinging, rotation of load etc.


415 Machine: An assembly of linked parts or components, atleast one of which moves, with the appropriate machine actu-ators, control and power circuits, etc., joined together for aspecific application, in particular for the processing, treatment,moving or packing of a material. The term machinery also cov-ers an assembly of machines which, in order to achieve one andthe same end, are arranged and controlled so that they functionas an integral whole.

416 Certificate of conformity: A document signed by a qual-ified party affirming that, at the time of assessment, the productor service met the stated requirements (BS 4778: Part 2).

417 Lifting accessory: Component or equipment not

attached to the machine and placed between the machinery andthe load or on the load in order to attach it

418 Lifting component: Parts of a lifting accessory.

419 Certificate of lifting appliance: A document based onthe ILO convention no. 152, issued by the Competent Person,which confirm that the lifting appliance is in compliance withthe requirements and is designed, fabricated, assembled,

erected, tested, documented and maintained, and can be safelyused.

420 Risk: The qualitative or quantitative likelihood of anaccident or unplanned event occurring, considered in conjunc-tion with the potential consequences of such a failure. In quan-titative terms, risk is the quantified probability of a definedfailure mode times its quantified consequence.

421 Risk Reduction Measures: Those measures taken toreduce the risks to the operation of process facilities and to thehealth and safety of personnel associated with it or in its vicin-ity by:

reduction in the probability of failure mitigation of the consequences of failure.

Guidance note:

The usual order of preference of risk reduction measures is:

a) Inherent Safety.

b) Prevention.

c) Detection.

d) Control.

e) Mitigation.

f) Emergency Response.


422 Safety Objectives: The safety goals for the design, con-struction, installation operation and abandonment the fixedoffshore structure including acceptance criteria for the level ofrisk acceptable to the Owner.

423 Statement of Compliance: A statement or report signedby a qualified party affirming that, at the time of assessment,the defined facility, phase, or collection of activities, met therequirements stated by the Owner.

424 Verification: An examination to confirm that an activity,a product or a service is in accordance with specified require-ments.

Guidance note:

The examination shall be based on information, which can beproved true, based on facts obtained through observation, meas-urement, test or other means.

ISO 8402: 1994: Verification: Confirmation by examination andprovision of objective evidence that specified requirements hasbeen fulfilled.


425 Competent person: Person, organisation or unit who hassufficient theoretical knowledge and practical experience toexamine and judge the technical safety of lifting appliances, inorder to issue reports and certificates.

Guidance note:

The term Competent Person corresponds to the term Enterprice

of Competence (EOC) used by The Offshore Mechanical Han-dling Committee (OMHEC). In some countries the Authoritiesrequire that the Competent person shall be certified, authorisedor accredited.


8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




Assessment codes: Codes used in this document to describe thetype and extent of assessment during risk based verification

E 500 References

CEN standardsNorsok standardsISO standardsAPI codes

Table B1 Assessment codes

Code Legend

I For information only

R1 review of principles and general aspects

R2 Review of principles, general aspects & spot check ofcalculations

S1 Surveillance on a visit basis, e.g. once per week orsample review 10-20%

S2 Surveillance frequency minimum once per day orreview of 50-60%

S3 Surveillance frequency minimum once per shift orreview of 100% of items

A Audit

H Hold point

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




SECTION 2SERVICE OVERVIEW

A. General

A 100 Objectives101 The objectives of this section are to provide:

an overview all verification activities relating to liftingappliances

details of DNVs verification services for lifting appli-ances.

B. Service Process

B 100 General principles

101 The description of the process of DNVs verification oflifting appliances is based on distinct project phases and therecognition of key milestones.

102 Verification performed by DNV normally progressesthrough one or more of these project phases and may includeall or selected aspects of the project.

103 The risk based verification process is described in rela-tion to the normal project phases:

Project initiation:

conceptual design.

Project realisation:

detail design

construction and factory acceptance test installation and commissioning issue of certificates enabling for operation.

Project operation:

operation maintenance repair.

Project abandonment:

decommissioning removal.

B 200 Simplified verification planning

201 The steps in the simplified verification planning are asfollows:

Use trigger questions to assess the overall risk level of theproject (or manageable elements thereof).

Evaluate the risk against the relevant owner or projectacceptance criteria (often this can be directly tied to theowner core values or a sub-set of these) and decidewhether the general verification involvement shall beLow, Medium or High.

Use the example detailed scope of work tables in Appen-dix B to make a first draft of a Verification Plan

Generate the project specific Verification Plan by includ-ing a project specific engineering judgment or risk analy-sis to adjust the table to suit the project.

Perform the verification execution according to the Verifi-cation Plan, making revision to the plan if and when nec-essary.

Report the verification.

202 The trigger questions are included in Appendix A.203 Generic scopes of work for verification at the three lev-els of verification; Low (L), Medium (M) and High (H), aregiven in the tables in this section.

204 Project specific detailed scope of work descriptions,based on the generic scopes of work tables and showing all theactivities to be verified, should be made. Examples of the levelof detail are given in Appendix B.

205 Tables in this section 2 give the principle differencesbetween the levels of verification involvement. The detailedexample tables are to be treated as examples only. They shallnot be used without a project specific confirmation of theircompleteness.

206 The project specific scope of work definition, derivedfrom the tables in Appendix B (or similar), shall be part of thefinal DNV verification report.

B 300 Selection of level of verification

301 The selection of the level of verification for the simpli-fied verification planning is facilitated by the trigger questionsincluded in Appendix A.

B 400 Codes, standards and reference documents

401 The verification process described in this DNV-OSS isnot tailored to a specific technical standard, code or referencedocument.

402 It is recommended to use internationally recognisedcodes or standards. Where combinations of standards andexternal criteria are used the exact terms of reference and doc-uments to be issued shall be agreed at the beginning of the

project and formally defined in the contract.

403 It is recommended strongly not to mix standards due tothe possible differences in safety philosophies.

Guidance note:

Most standards are a coherent collection of requirements for allthe relevant aspects of a lifting appliance. These aspects, e.g. loadand resistance, are normally among themselves adjusted to givean overall acceptable safety level. To pick requirements from dif-ferent standards can then easily result in unpredictable and non-uniform levels of safety.


C. Project Initiation

C 100 Verification during conceptual design

101 Verification during the conceptual and/or feasibilitystudies of a project and in the early stages of a project canreduce the need for verification during the design, constructionand installation phases, and can reduce costs during the longterm operation, inspection and maintenance phases.

102 It is recommended to combine the design verificationduring project initiation phase with additional review of:

project schedule cost impacts business risks.

103 During this phase it may be beneficial to make an initialverification plan. Risk evaluations are carried out during this

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




phase and should be used to get an indication of the generalverification level; Low, Medium or High.

D. Project Realization

D 100 General

101 All design, construction and installation aspects, rele-vant to a lifting appliance, may be covered by the life cycleverification.

102 In this specification the split in the scope of workbetween design, construction and installation is made betweensets of requirements (specifications) developed during the var-ious phases.

Guidance note:

The split between design, construction and installation may vary,but it is useful to spend some time on the definition to reduceinterface problems later.


D 200 Verification of overall project management

201 Verification of the overall project management is theexamination of the means of controlling the entire processleading up to an operational lifting appliance.

202 This verification should confirm that the necessary con-trols are in place to ensure information flow across the variousinterfaces. It is especially important where separate contractorshave been employed for different phases of the project such asdesign, construction and installation.

203 Typically the documentation is expected to be in linewith ISO 9000 requirements.

204 Definition of scope of work for verification of overallproject management shall follow Table D1.

205 The verification of the overall project management qual-ity system and documentation is optional. The reviews andaudits should typically be performed if an extensive verifica-tion of a project is performed, while might be omitted forsmaller sub-phase verifications.

D 300 Verification during design

301 Design verification is the examination of the assump-tions, methods and results of the design process and is per-formed at the specified level of verification to ensure that thespecified performance requirements of the lifting appliancewill be achieved.

302 Design verification should consist of one, or some, ofthe following:

review of the design process

review of specifications for design (asset specifications) review of design reports and drawings review of diagrams and descriptions review of specifications for construction, installation and

operation, resulting from design.

303 The documents that shall be produced in the projectshould as a minimum satisfy the requirements of the selectedcode.

304 Definition of scope of work for verification of designshould follow Table D2.

305 Design documentation may depend on the complexity ofthe lifting appliance consist of the following:

name and address of the manufacturer, vendors, client,crane owner and intended location (if known)

specifications for design, i.e. regulations, standards,codes, and client specifications (optional)

design criteria including design temperature, environmen-tal influences, and area classifications

load ratings classification of structures, mechanisms and systems general arrangement of the lifting appliance including rig-

ging/reeving plans info regarding personnel lifting, if applicable detailed construction drawings on all elements concerning

technical safety

structural design calculations, including failure curves, ifapplicable machinery design calculations system design calculations fire and gas protection drawings and descriptions noise protection plans and drawings drawings and specifications for electrical components cable and piping specifications prime and secondary movers, such as diesel engines, el.

motors, hydraulic pumps etc. operational limitations including overload protection sys-

tem calculations if applicable specifications for construction including material specifi-

cations, welding specifications, NDE-extent

programme for functional and load tests fabrication plans and schedules drawings of marking operation and maintenance manual.

306 The documents that shall be produced in the project andhanded over to DNV shall enable for the selected level of ver-ification, ref. Table D2 and should as a minimum satisfy therequirements of the selected code.

307 Definition of scope of work for verification of designshould follow Table D2.

Table D1 Scope of work for verification of overall project

management

Level

Verification activity Low Med High

Review of the project management process by

review of project quality managementdocumentation

X X

audit of project quality managementsystem

X

review of sub-contractor control X

Table D2 Scope of work for verification of design

Level


Review of the design process by

review of design quality managementdocumentation

X

Review of specifications for design by

review of the design specifications, i.e.regulations, standards, codes and clientspecifications (optional)

review of the design basis with emphasison the design criteria and classifications

X

X

X

X

X

X

Review of design risk assessment

review of the risk assessment reports,including acceptance requirements andresults

X X

spot check of critical aspects X X

evaluation of critical aspects, includingSHE as identified in the risk assessmentreports

X

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




Guidance note:

Design verification activities may be split up between BasicDesign and Detailed Design, or other sub-phases, depending on

type of contract.---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---

D 400 Verification during construction and factoryacceptance test

401 This phase comprises prefabrication, fabrication, assem-bly, erection and Factory acceptance Test. An important ele-ment is to ensure that the contractual design requirements areincorporated in the purchase documentation, and that correctmaterials, components and proper testing procedures areapplied such that it meets the requirements as per approvedspecifications and procedures. It is recommended that relevant

preparations for this is started as early as possible, e.g. by theappointment of a vendor supply verification co-ordinator.

402 Verification during construction and factory acceptancetest is carried out by means of attendance, audits, inspection orspot checks of the work as well as witnessing of factory accept-ance test, as appropriate, in sufficient detail to ensure that thespecified requirements of the lifting appliance will beachieved.

403 Verification of these activities relates not only to themanufacturers work but also to the monitoring of this workcarried out by vendors and contractors others.

404 Construction and factory acceptance test verificationmay consist of one, or some, of the following:

reviewing the quality assurance system documentationadopted by the manufacturer and vendors

reviewing the construction process reviewing construction procedures reviewing qualification process reviewing manufacturer survey arrangements, if applica-

ble surveillance during construction activities witnessing during factory acceptance test reviewing final documentation.

405 The documentation that should be submitted for revieware typically:

manufacturing quality system documentation manufacturing procedures, including test requirements

and acceptance criteria, repairs, personnel qualificationrecords etc.

material certificates test and calibration records dimensional measurement reports welding documentation incl. NDE reports

noise and vibration records.

406 Particularly for the Factory Acceptance Test it is highlyrecommended to prepare a formal test procedure be verified

prior to commencement.

407 Scope of work for verification of construction shouldfollow Table D3 for manufacturing and fabrication and Table

D4 for FAT.

Guidance note:

Materials and components may be ordered with certificates ofvarying degrees of independent 3rd party verification This canthis be integrated in the overall verification activities, so not toduplicate work.


Review of drawings, diagrams anddocumentation by

review of the formal documentation toensure that the requirements have been

accounted for in design and that thechosen design philosophies are inaccordance with specified codes andstandards

X X X

evaluation of the main methods used andspot checks of the input data and thecalculation results

X X

detailed review of main design reports X

detailed review of the foundationreaction forces

X X X

detailed review of the user manual X X X

Table D2 Scope of work for verification of design (Continued)

Level


Table D3 Scope of work for verification of manufacturing and

fabrication

Level


Review of the manufacturing and fabricationprocess

Review of manufacturing and fabricationquality management systems

X X

Audit of the quality management system X

Review of manufacturing and fabricationprocedures

Review of the design verification report X X

Review manufacturing, fabrication andinspection procedures for confirmation ofcompliance with the manufacturingspecification

X

Surveillance during manufacturing andfabrication activities

Visit-based or full-time attendanceduring manufacturing and fabrication toensure, based on spot checks, that thecomponents and assemblies have beenproduced in accordance with themanufacturing specification

X X

Review of fabrication records

Review the Manufacturing Data Book, asapplicable

X X

Review of formal documentation X X

Table D4 Scope of work for verification of Factory Acceptance

Tests

Level


Review of test programme and preparations fortesting

Review the FAT programme for confirma-tion of compliance with the requirementsand specifications

X X

Surveillance during testing

Surveillance to ensure that the assembly,erection, rigging and configuration, com-plies with the test procedure requirements

X X

Survey of the main elements to verifycompliance with the constructionrequirements

X X

Survey of testing to ensure that the results

comply with the test procedure require-ments regarding safety aspects

X X

Survey of testing to ensure that the resultscomply with the test procedure require-ments regarding performance, enduranceand SHE aspects

X

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




D 500 Verification during installation andcommisioning

501 This phase comprises shipment, installation, testing andcommissioning in conjunction with hand over of the liftingappliance to the user and to bring the lifting appliance into usefor the first time.

502 An important element is to ensure that the lifting appli-

ance as installed on its final location meets the requirements inthe regulations and as per approved specifications and proce-dures. It is imperative that relevant preparations for this isstarted as early as possible, e.g. by the appointment of a instal-lation and commissioning responsible co-ordinator.

503 Verification during installation and commissioning iscarried out by means of attendance, audits, inspection or spotchecks of the work as well as witnessing of function and over-load testing, as appropriate, in sufficient detail to ensure thatthe specified requirements of the lifting appliance will beachieved.

504 Verification of these activities relates not only to themanufacturers work but also to the monitoring of the work car-ried out by vendors installation contractors and others.

505 Installation and commissioning test verification shallconsist of one, or some, of the following:

reviewing the installation and commissioning plans reviewing installation and commissioning procedures reviewing qualification process surveillance during installation activities witnessing during function and overload test reviewing final documentation.

506 The documents that should be produced in the projectand submitted for review prior to installation and commission-ing are typically:

Quality plans

Installation procedures, including test requirements andacceptance criteria, repairs, personnel qualificationrecords etc

Welding documentation including NDT reports Pressure testing procedures Pretensioning procedures Piping and cabling hook up procedures Access and maintenance plans and Manufacturers / installers quality system manual.

507 Particularly for the Commisioning Acceptance Test it ishighly recommended to prepare a formal test procedure be ver-ified prior to commencement.

508 The as-built documentation to be submitted afterinstallation include but not be limited to:

Installation records, i.e. dimensional reports, hook up testreports, personnel qualification records etc

Material certificates Welding records, oil test samples, heat treatment etc. Vibration and noise reports Commissioning report.

509 Definition of scope of work for verification of installa-tion and commissioning should follow Table D5 for testingand completion.

D 600 Verification at issuance of Certificate of LiftingAppliance

601 This phase comprises final issuance of the certificate ofLifting Appliance which is required to bring the lifting appli-ance into use for the first time.

602 The scope of this verification is to summarise all previ-ous verification activities and issue the required certificationdocuments as competent person.

603 Verification at issuance of the Certificate of LiftingAppliance shall consist of some or all of the following activi-ties:

reviewing the design verification reports

reviewing the construction and FAT reports, including

component and product certificates and former ILO certif-icates

reviewing installation and commissioning reports, includ-ing modification/repair reports, and upgrading documen-tation, if relevant.

Table D5 Scope of work for verification during installation and

commissioning

Level

Verification activity Low Med HighInitial activities

Review of quality system documentation X X

Review of previous verification reports X X X

Review of qualification records X

Surveillance during installation activities

Part time attendance during installation toverify that the foundation, interfaceconnection, access and escape routes areproperly installed

X X

Review of installation documentation

Review of foundation design report X X X

Review of installation records and reports X X X

Surveillance during test activities

Witnessing of installation andcommissioning testing regarding safetyand integrity

X X X

Witnessing of SHE aspects, performanceand endurance testing

X

Review of final documentation

Spot check of as-built documentation X X

Review of as-built documentation X

Review of formal documentation, i.e. ECDeclaration of Conformity, if applicable

X X X

Review of user instructions X X X

Review of former ILO certificates, ifapplicable

X X X

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




604 The scope of work for verification at issuance of Certif-icate of Lifting Appliance shall follow Table D6. If a certainverification level is aimed for to be stated on the certificate,this verification level as a minimum has to be followed in the

previous verification phases.

1) The design verification activity may be carried out duringinstallation and commissioning.

2) The low level verification during construction and FATdoes not involve DNV.

E. Verification Documents

E 100 General

101 The hierarchy of verification document is given inDNV-OSS-300 Appendix B. The descriptions of the content ofthese documents as well as examples of document forms aregiven in Appendix C to this specification.

Table D6 Scope of work for final issuance of Certificate of

Lifting Appliance

Level

Verification level applied stated on thecertificate

Low Med High

Verification of projectmanagement

M/H H

Design verification report L/M/H 1) M/H H

Construction and FAT report L/M/H 2) M/H H

Installation and commissioningreport

L/M/H M/H H

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



Page 16 App.A see note on front cover

APPENDIX ASELECTION OF VERIFICATION LEVEL

A. General

A 100 General principles101 The selection of the level of verification depends on therisk level of each of the elements that have an impact on themanagement of risks to the asset.

102 Verification shall direct greatest effort at those elementsof the asset where the risk is highest and whose failure orreduced performance will have the most significant impact onthe project objective and goals, e.g.:

safety risks, environmental risks, economic/business risks.

103 Suitable selection factors include, but are not limited to,the:

overall safety and other objectives for the asset assessment of the risks associated with the asset and the

measures taken to reduce these risks degree of technical innovation in the asset experience of the contractors in carrying out the work quality management systems of the owner and its contrac-

tors business risk associated with schedule impact and rework.

104 Due to the diversity of various lifting appliances, theircontents, their degree of innovation, the geographic location,etc., it is not possible to give precise guidelines on how todecide what level of verification is appropriate for each partic-ular structure.

105 Therefore, guidance is given in the form of a series ofquestions that should be answered when deciding the appropri-ate level of verification for a process facility. This list is notexhaustive and other questions should be added to the list ifappropriate for a particular process facility.

106 It must be emphasised that the contribution of each ele-ment should be judged qualitatively and/or quantitatively.Wherever possible quantified risk assessment data should useto provide a justifiable basis for any decisions made.

107 Depending on the stage of the project, the activities maynot have taken place yet in which case the questions can also

be posed in another form, i.e. Is . planned to be?

B. Trigger Questions

B 100 Overall Project Objective and Goals

Does the safety objective address the main safety goals? Does the safety objective establish acceptance criteria for

the level of risk acceptable to the owner? Is this risk (depending on the type of appliance and its

location) also measured in terms of environmental, eco-nomic and political consequences?

In terms of scope of work is the project schedule realistic? Does the contract place severe financial penalties if target

dates for commissioning are not met?

Guidance note:

Substitute Safety Objective with other relevant objectives for theproject, and go through all of them.


B 200 Assessment of risk

Has a systematic review been carried out to identify andevaluate the probabilities and consequences of failures inthe lifting appliance?

Has this review judged the contribution of each elementqualitatively and/or quantitatively and used, where possi-

ble, quantified risk assessment data to provide a justifiablebasis for any decisions made?

Does the extent of the review reflect the risk level of thelifting appliance, the planned operation and previous expe-rience with similar appliances?

Does this review identify the risk to the operation of thelifting appliance and to the health and safety of personnelassociated with it or in its vicinity?

Has the extent of the identified risks been reduced to alevel as low as reasonably practicable by means of one or

both of: reduction in the probability of failure? mitigation of the consequences of failure?

Has the result of the systematic review of the risks beenmeasured against the Owners safety (or other) objective?

Has the result of this review been used in the selection ofthe appropriate verification activity level?

In terms of schedule which are the items which have a sig-nificant impact?

B 300 Technical innovation

Has the degree of technical innovation in the lifting appli-ance design been considered? Has it been considered that risks to the structure are likely

to be greater with a high degree of technical innovationthan with an appliance designed, fabricated and installedto usual/typical criteria ?

Have factors been considered in the selection of the appro-priate verification level such as:

degree of difficulty in achieving technical require-ments?

knowledge of similar solutions?

B 400 Contractors experience

Has the degree of risk to the design/fabrication and instal-lation been considered with respect to the experience ofthe manufacturer/contractor?

Has the degree of risk been considered where the manu-facturers/contractors are experienced but not in similarwork?

Has the degree of risk been considered where the workschedule is tight?

B 500 Quality management systems

Have all parties involved in the project implemented an

adequate quality management system to ensure that grosserrors in the work are limited? Do these parties include the:

owner? design contractor?

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



see note on front cover App.A Page 17

construction contractors? vendors? installation contractor? operator?

Do the factors being considered when evaluating the ade-quacy of the quality management system include:

Whether or not an ISO 9000 or equivalent certifiedsystem is in place?

results from external audits? results from internal audits? experience with contractors previous work? project work force familiarity with the quality man-

agement system?

B 600 Simplified assessment and verification level

See Appendix E Table B-1.

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



Page 18 App.B see note on front cover

APPENDIX BDETAILED EXAMPLE SCOPE OF WORK TABLES FOR VERIFICATION

A. General

A 100 General introduction

101 This appendix provides the format of the detailed verifi-cation lists (tables), generated for typical systems comprisinga lifting facility:

1) Cranes

2) Lifting accessories

3) Lifting appliances for life saving equipment

4) Lifting person devices

5) Drilling hoisting equipment

6) Robots.

which shall be made for each particular project.102 The detailed project specific verification lists for thechosen level of verification shall be based on these tables.

103 For project scenarios or components not covered in thisAppendix, similar lists with the same degree of detail shall bemade.

104 If any of the activities are moved from one phase toanother, then this must be identified clearly identified on thelist where it is removed. Similarly, the detailed list for the

phase to where it is moved shall be amended.

Guidance note:

Typically, contractual boundaries may give natural splits ofactivities between phases. However, then it is then even more

important to ensure that there is a traceably as to which phaseswhat activity belong and that this is also conveyed to the contrac-tors also.


B. Description of Terms Used in the Scope ofWork Tables

B 100 General

101 The following abbreviations have been used. The defini-tions of which are given subsequently:

A is audit S is surveillance H is Hold Point R is review I is for information.

102 These abbreviations are DNVs preferred terms and nor-mally will be used in DNV-generated documents. However,other terms, for example monitoring or witnessing, will beused by DNV if these are the terms commonly used in docu-ments, such as Inspection and Test Plans, generated by others.In that case, it is expected that these other terms are defined inthese documents.

B 200 Audit201 Systematic and independent examination to determinewhether quality activities and related results comply with

planned arrangements and whether these arrangements areimplemented effectively and are suitable to achieve objectives

(ISO 8402:1994).

Guidance note:

This activity differs from the surveillance by being focused onthe adherence to and completeness and robustness of the proce-dures and not on the actual result of the procedure (although thisis not ignored). Further, the audit is normally a one-off activityas opposed to the continuity in monitoring.


B 300 Surveillance

301 Continual monitoring and verification of the status of anentity and analysis of records to ensure that specified require-ments are being fulfilled (ISO 8402:1994).

Guidance note:

Other commonly used terms for surveillance are monitoring orwitnessing.


302 The amount of work involved in surveillance is notdescribed in detail in the tables. This shall be part of the finalcontractual scope of work which shall define the frequency ofsurveillance based on the overall surveillance and the qualitycontrol performed by other parties as well as DNVs experi-ence.

303 The following shall be used to describe the frequency ifnothing else is specifically defined:

S1 = Surveillance on a visit basis, e.g. once per week or

sample review 10-20%S2 = Surveillance frequency minimum once per day or

review of 50-60%

S3 = Surveillance frequency minimum once per shift orreview of 100% of items

Guidance note:

These surveillance frequencies may be modified to correspondwith production work flow.


B 400 Review

401 Systematic examination of reports and documentation

against a project defined verification basis.The depth of review will depend both on the type of documentand the level of involvement.

402 The following shall be used to describe the extent of thereview if nothing else is specifically defined:

I = for information only

R1 = review of principles and general aspectsR2 = Review of principles, general aspects & spot check of

calculations

Guidance note:

Review of production records does not guarantee their correct-ness. It is a confirmation to DNV that the manufacturer and/or

sub-contractor has preformed the required activity and issued areport.


403 Reports that are reviewed by DNV will, unless other-

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10



see note on front cover App.B Page 19

wise agreed, not be signed and stamped.

C. Overall Project Management

C 100 General

101 The project quality management documentation, if partof scope, should be available for review at the early stages ofthe project, preferably before design is underway, to ensurethat the necessary controls are in place.

D. Design

D 100 General

101 Design consists of conceptual and detailed design andtheir associated documentation.

102 The scope of work for design verification is shown intables listed in this chapter, for various types of lifting appli-

ances. The tables states a recommended scope of work for low,medium and high level verification, and may be changed uponan agreement between the Client and DNV based on themethod listed in Appendix A.

103 For manufacturers and vendors who have established aDNV approved ISO9000 quality system covering design oflifting appliances, this may reduce the scope of work accord-ingly, upon agreement with DNV. Appendix B describes theissues to be reviewed and the extent of verification included inthe three verification levels.

D 200 Verification during design

201 For verification of lifting appliances during design thefollowing activities are considered:

initial activities review activities final activities

The initial activities includes a review of basic project infor-

mation, design criteria and the design quality management sys-tem of the designer. The review activities include evaluation ofdocumentation related to the design of the lifting appliance.The final activities include issuance of a design verificationreport.

D 300 Low level design verification

301 TheLow level design verification consists of a minimumverification involvement in order for DNV to issue a DesignVerification Report. Provided that the proceeding verificationactivities are performed during construction, FAT, installationand commissioning, a DNV Certificate of Lifting Appliancemay finally be issued. The Low level verification scheme is

based that the risks associated with potential faulty design isconsidered to be low, typically for smaller, low capacity liftingappliances. The Client may find internal control measures suf-ficient and choose a low level design verification based on for-mal requirements towards the designer, such as qualityassurance requirement, internal verification or EC Declarationof Conformity issued by the manufacturer. Low level designverification will imply that the manufacturer is the sole respon-

sible for the Technical Construction File, and that a very lim-ited extent of documentation is subject for design review.

D 400 Medium level design verification

401 Medium level design verification consists of a review ofmain design documents related to safety and integrity. Criticalaspects will be spot checked with focus on strength and integ-rity. The review will be detailed for high risk aspects and inde-

pendent checks will be performed. The medium level designverification corresponds to the ILO certification schemeapplied world wide in the maritime area. Ref. DNV Standardfor Certification No. 2.22 Lifting Appliances.

D 500 High level design verification

501 High level design verification consists of a full review ofmost of the produced documents related to safety and integrity,including SHE aspects, performance and endurance of the lift-ing appliance. The main specifications are also checked. Thereview will be detailed for all high risk aspects and independ-ent checks will be performed. Less critical aspects will be spotchecked. High level design verification is recommended forlifting appliances representing high risks, such as high capacitycranes, cranes lifting over process areas, cranes lifting persons,etc.

Table B1 Assessment codes

Code Legend

I For information only

R1 Review of principles and general aspects

R2 Review of principles, general aspects and spotcheck of calculations

S1 Surveillance on a visit basis, e.g. once per week orsample review 10-20%

S2 Surveillance frequency minimum once per day orreview of 50-60%

S3 Surveillance frequency minimum once per shift orreview of 100% of items

A Audit

H Hold point

Table C1 Overall project management

Item Description Level

Low Med High

1 review of project qualitymanagement documentation

R2 R2

2 audit of project qualitymanagement system

A

3 review of sub-contractor control R24 review of interface controls R1 R2

5 review of methods of informationflow

R1

Table D1 Crane verification during design

Item Description

Level

Low Med High

Initial activities

1 Review of basic information, name ofaddress of designer, manufacturer, ven-dors, user and intended location, ifknown

I I I

2 Review of design specifications, i.e.regulations, standards, codes and clientspecifications, if applicable

I R1 R2

3 Review of design criteria, includingdesign temperature, environmentalinfluences, area classifications, designclassifications of structures, mecha-nisms and systems

R1 R1 R2

4 Review of design quality managementsystem

- R1 R2

5 Review of technical risk assessmentreport

- - R2

6 Technical design verification kick-offmeeting

- - H

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




Review activities

7 Review of general arrangement, riggingand reeving plan

R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts and lift-

ing tables, speeds and operational limi-tations

R1 R2 R2

9 Review info on personnel lifting, ifapplicable

R1 R2 R2

10 Review of detailed construction draw-ings and design calculations on allstructural elements essential forstrength and safety

- R1 R2

11 Review of diagrams and calculationsfor sequence of failure, if applicable

- R1 R2

12 Review of detailed drawings, calcula-tions and documentation on all machin-ery elements and components essentialfor strength and safety

- R1 R2

13 Review of performance capacity andendurance calculations

- - R1

14 Review of detailed drawings, diagramsand calculations on all system elementsessential for technical safety

- R1 R2

15Review of control and work positionincluding all SHE aspects

- R1 R2

16 Review of control system documenta-tion, including PLC programs if appli-cable

- R1 R2

17 Review of safety system documenta-tion including PLC programs if applica-ble

- R1 R2

8 Review of communication and utilitysystems documentation

- R1 R1

19 Review of fire and explosion protectiondrawings and descriptions - R1 R2

20 Review of noise and vibration protec-tion drawings and descriptions

- R1 R2

21 Review of electrical drawings and dia-grams including EMC

- R1 R2

22 Review of cabling and terminationspecification and arrangement draw-ings

- - R1

23 Review of piping specification andarrangement drawings

- - R1

24 Review of access and escape routesarrangement drawings

- R1 R2

25 Review of control station and workpositions arrangement drawings

- R1 R2

26 Review of FAT test programmes andcommissioning test programmes

- R1 R2

27 Review of labelling and marking docu-mentation

- R1 R1

28 Review of corrosion protection docu-mentation

- - R1

29 Review of vendor documentation,including product certificates

- R2 R2

30 Review of foundation reaction forces R2 R2 R2

31 Review of fabrication specifications,plans and schedules

- I I

32 Review of user manual including oper-ating instructions, emergency proce-dures and maintenance instructions

R2 R2 R2

Table D1 Crane verification during design (Continued)

Item DescriptionLevel

Low Med High

33 Review of EC declaration of conform-ity, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

34 Review of Notified Body certificates orstatements, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

Final activities35 Issue Design Verification Report H H H

Table D2 Lifting accessories verification during design


Low Med High

Initial activities

1 Review of basic information, name ofaddress of designer, manufacturer,vendors, user and intended location, ifknown

I I I

2 Review of design specifications, i.e.

regulations, standards, codes and cli-ent specifications, if applicable

I R1 R2

3 Review of design criteria, includingdesign temperature, environmentalinfluences, area classifications, designclassifications of structures, mecha-nisms and systems, if applicable

R1 R1 R2


- R1 R2


- - R2


- - H

Review activities

7 Review of general arrangement, rig-ging and reeving plan R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts and lift-ing tables and operational limitations

R1 R2 R2


R1 R2 R2


- R1 R2

11 Review of detailed drawings, calcula-tions and documentation on allmachinery elements and componentsessential for strength and safety

- R1 R2

12 Review of performance capacity and

endurance calculations

- - R1

13 Review of detailed drawings, dia-grams and calculations on all systemelements essential for technical safety

- R1 R2

14 Review of control and work positionincluding all SHE aspects

- R1 R2


- R1 R2

16 Review of safety system documenta-tion including PLC programs if appli-cable

- R1 R2


- R1 R1

18 Review of electrical drawings and dia-grams, including EMC

- R1 R2


- - R1

Table D1 Crane verification during design (Continued)


Low Med High

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10





- - R1

21 Review of corrosion protection docu-

mentation

- - R1


- R1 R2

23 Review of labelling and marking doc-umentation

- R1 R1


- R2 R2

25 Review of suspension reaction forces R2 R2 R2


- I I

27 Review of user manual includingoperating instructions, emergencyprocedures and maintenance instruc-tions

R2 R1 R2

28 Review of EC declaration of conform-ity, if applicable R2 R1 R1

29 Review of Notified Body certificatesor statements, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

Final activities:

30 Issue Design Verification Report H H H

Table D3 Lifting appliances for life saving equipment

verification during design


Low Med High

Initial activities


I I I

2 Review of design specifications, i.e.regulations, standards, codes and cli-ent specifications, if applicable

I R1 R2

3 Review of design criteria, includingdesign temperature, environmentalinfluences, area classifications,design classifications of structures,mechanisms and systems

R1 R1 R2

4 Review of design quality manage-ment system

- R1 R2


- - R2


- - H

Review activities

7 Review of general arrangement, rig-ging and reeving plan

R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts and lift-ing tables, speeds and operational lim-itations

R1 R2 R2


R1 R2 R2

Table D2 Lifting accessories verification during design

(Continued)


Low Med High

10 Review of detailed construction draw-ings and design calculations on allstructural elements essential for

strength and safety

- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

16 Review of safety system documenta-tion, including PLC programs if appli-cable

- R1 R2


- R1 R1

18 Review of fire and explosion protec-tion drawings and descriptions

- R1 R2


- R1 R2

20 Review of electrical drawings anddiagrams including EMC

- R1 R2


- - R1

22 Review of piping specification andarrangement drawings - - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R1


- - R1


- R2 R2



- I I


R2 R2 R2


R2 R2 R2

33 Review of Notified Body certificatesor statements, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

Final activities:


Table D3 Lifting appliances for life saving equipment

verification during design (Continued)


Low Med High

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




Table D4 Lifting person devices verification during design


Low Med High

Initial activities


I I I


I R1 R2

3 Review of design criteria, includingdesign temperature, environmentalinfluences, area classifications, designclassifications of structures, mecha-nisms and systems

R1 R1 R2


- R1 R2


- - R2


- - H

Review activities


R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts and lift-ing tables, speeds and operational lim-itations

R1 R2 R2

9 Review info on personnel lifting R1 R2 R2


- R1 R2

11 Review of detailed drawings, calcula-

tions and documentation on allmachinery elements and componentsessential for strength and safety

- R1 R2


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

20 Review of electrical drawings and dia-grams including EMC

- R1 R2


- - R1


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

26 Review of labelling and marking doc-

umentation

- R1 R1


- - R1


- R2 R2



- I I


R2 R2 R2


R2 R2 R2

33 Review of Notified Body certificatesor statements, if applicable R2 R2 R2

Final activities:


Table D5 Drilling hoisting equipment verification during design


Low Med High

Initial activities


I I I


I R1 R2


R1 R1 R2

4 Review of design quality manage-ment system documentation

- R1 R2


- - R2


- - H

Review activities


R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts andlifting tables, speeds and operationallimitations

R1 R2 R2


R1 R2 R2

10 Review of detailed constructiondrawings and design calculations onall structural elements essential forstrength and safety

- R1 R2

11 Review of detailed drawings, calcula-tions and documentation on all

machinery elements and componentsessential for strength and safety

- R1 R2

12Review of performance capacity andendurance calculations

- - R1

Table D4 Lifting person devices verification during design

(Continued)


Low Med High

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10





- R1 R2


- R1 R2

15 Review of control system documenta-tion, including PLC programs ifapplicable

- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

20 Review of electrical drawings anddiagrams including EMC - R1 R2


- - R1


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R1


- - R1


- R2 R2



- I I


R2 R2 R2

32 Review of EC declaration of con-formity, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

33 Review of Notified Body certificates

or statements, if applicable

R2 R2 R2

Final activities:


Table D5 Drilling hoisting equipment verification during design

(Continued)


Low Med High

Table D6 Robots verification during design


Low Med High

Initial activities

1 Review of basic information, name ofaddress of designer, manufacturer,

vendors, user and intended location, ifknown

I I I


I R1 R2


R1 R1 R2

4 Review of design quality manage-ment system

- R1 R2


- - R2

6 Technical design verification kick-off

meeting

- - H

Review activities


R1 R2 R2

8 Review of ratings, load charts andlifting tables, speeds and operationallimitations

R1 R2 R2

9 Review of detailed constructiondrawings and design calculations onall structural elements essential forstrength and safety

- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

12 Review of control system documenta-tion, including PLC programs ifapplicable

- R1 R2


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

16 Review of noise and vibration protec-

tion drawings and descriptions

- R1 R2

17 Review of electrical drawings anddiagrams including EMC

- R1 R2


- - R1


- - R1


- R1 R2


- R1 R2


- R1 R2

23 Review of labelling and marking doc-umentation - R1 R1


- - R1

8/3/2019 oss-308_2008-10




E. Construction and Factory Acceptance Test(FAT)

E 100 General

101 Construction and FAT consists of fabrication site activ-ities and their associated documentation.

102 The scope of work for verification during constructionand FAT is shown in tables listed in this chapter, for varioustypes of lifting appliances. The tables states a recommendedscope of work for low, medium and high level verification, andmay be changed upon an agreement between the Client andDNV based on the m