osteoporosis 2016 | relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study
KA Ward, MH Edwards, K Jameson, S Shaw, H Syddall, C Cooper, EM Dennison
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of SouthamptonMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge
![Page 2: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Musculoskeletal ageing
• By 2050 2 milliards of people aged >65 years, c.f. 600 million today
• Osteoporosis: 1 in 2 women, 1 in 5 men > 50 yrs.
• Sarcopenia: No defined consensus, IWGS, EWGSOP, FNIH.
• Healthcare costs:• OP - £2million/day, £5 billion/yr• Sarcopenia - >$18 billion in the US 2001
• Sarcopenia, falls and fracture prevention
Hertfordshire Cohort Study
• Lean mass indices – cortical area and thickness
• Fat mass indices – trabecular density, number independent of LMI
• Compartmental effects cortical vs trabecular bone, lean mass vs. fat
• Muscle strength – mass, anatomy (fibre composition, IMAT, pennation angle), force and power generating capacity
Edwards MH, PhD Thesis 2014Edwards 2015, Bone, 81 145-151
![Page 3: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Jumping mechanography
Mus
cle C
SA (c
m3 )
Chai
r rise
(s-1)
Age (years)
JM P
ower
(W k
g-1)
Age (years)Age (years)
Rittweger, 2004, J Am J Geriatr Soc, 52:128–131
![Page 4: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Power – functional capacity, e.g arresting a fall, walk speed Force – measure of the load to boneEfficiency – how well you utilise force to generate power
![Page 5: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methods
• 184 (144) men and 166 (104) women, mean (SD) age M 75.9 (2.4), F 75.9 (2.6)
• HRpQCT of the tibia and radius (X-Treme I™, Scanco Medical)
• 2-leg countermovement jump to assess jump force and power (Leonardo ™, Novotec Medical)
• Linear regression models, males and females separately• age, weight, height• social class, smoking status,
calcium intake, hormone replacement use and years since menopause in women.
![Page 6: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Jump power
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Males (unadj)
Tot a
rea
Cor
t are
a
Trab
are
a
Cor
t thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Jump power
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Females (103)
Tot a
rea
Cor
t are
a
Trab
are
a
Cor
t thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Power
* * ** * *
Adjusted for age, height and weight
![Page 7: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Jump power
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Males (142)
Tot a
rea
Cor
t are
a
Trab
are
a
Cor
t thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Males (127)
Jump power
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Females (103)
Tot a
rea
Cor
t are
a
Trab
are
a
Cor
t thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Females (90)
Power
* * * **
Adjusted for age, height, weight, social class, smoking status, calcium intake, hormone replacement use and years since menopause in women
![Page 8: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Force
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Males (unadj)
Tot a
rea
Cort
are
a
Trab
are
a
Cort
thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Force
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Females (103)
Tot a
rea
Cort
are
a
Trab
are
a
Cort
thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cort
por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Force
** * * * * * ***
Adjusted for age, height and weight
![Page 9: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Force
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Males (144)
Tot a
rea
Cort
are
a
Trab
are
a
Cort
thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cor
t por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Males (128)
Force
HRpQCT
SD p
er 1
SD
cha
nge
in p
ower
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0Females (103)
Tot a
rea
Cort
are
a
Trab
are
a
Cort
thk
Cor
t BM
D
Cort
por
Trab
BM
D
Trab
No
Trab
thk
Females (90)
Force
*
Adjusted for age, height, weight, social class, smoking status, calcium intake, hormone replacement use and years since menopause in women
![Page 10: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusions
• In women, greater muscle power and force had more cortical and trabecular bone
• In men, consistent negative associations with porosity were found, suggesting lower turnover with greater power
• No associations between pQCT and jump parameters (data not shown) at the distal or diaphyseal sites
• LMI and FMI are more consistent predictors of bone microarchitecture in older adults (function vs. mass).
• Findings are less strong and more inconsistent than in other cohorts who are in general younger and have a wider range of ages.
![Page 11: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
AcknowledgementsCo-authors
Mark Edwards, Cyrus Cooper, Elaine DennisonKaren Jameson, Sarah Shaw, Holly Sydall
FundingMedical Research Council
Study ParticipantsHertfordshire Cohort Study
![Page 12: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lean mass indices: men
Unadjusted Fully adjusted
N Regression coefficient 95% CI p-value N Regression
coefficient 95% CI p-value
tibia total area135 -0.035 (-0.207, 0.136) 0.684 122 -0.041 (-0.230, 0.148) 0.667
tibia cortical area 136 0.499 (0.349, 0.648) <0.001 123 0.524 (0.358, 0.691) <0.001tibia trabecular area 137 -0.125 (-0.296, 0.046) 0.152 123 -0.137 (-0.322, 0.048) 0.146tibia apparent cortical thickness 136 0.437 (0.282, 0.593) <0.001 123 0.462 (0.295, 0.628) <0.001tibia cortical BMD 136 0.148 (-0.022, 0.318) 0.087 123 0.105 (-0.077, 0.287) 0.255tibia cortical porosity 136 0.023 (-0.141, 0.187) 0.783 123 0.082 (-0.097, 0.261) 0.365tibia trabecular density 137 0.132 (-0.035, 0.299) 0.119 123 0.172 (-0.010, 0.354) 0.064tibia trabecular number 137 0.262 (0.110, 0.415) 0.001 123 0.259 (0.088, 0.430) 0.003tibia trabecular thickness 137 -0.065 (-0.235, 0.106) 0.453 123 -0.008 (-0.191, 0.174) 0.927
Results are an SD change per one SD change in predictor
Adjusted for age, height, weight, social class, smoker status, alcohol consumption, activity, dietary calcium and HRT use and years since menopause in women
![Page 13: Osteoporosis 2016 | Relationships between muscle function and bone microarchitecture in the Hertfordshire cohort study: Kate Ward #osteo2016](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081604/5871f3b31a28ab5c348b60b3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Lean mass indices: women
Unadjusted Fully adjusted
N Regression coefficient 95% CI p-value N Regression
coefficient 95% CI p-value
tibia total area100 0.134 (-0.065, 0.333) 0.184 91 0.087 (-0.143, 0.317) 0.454
tibia cortical area 100 0.489 (0.313, 0.664) <0.001 91 0.498 (0.293, 0.704) <0.001tibia trabecular area 100 0.060 (-0.140, 0.261) 0.553 91 0.012 (-0.222, 0.245) 0.921tibia apparent cortical thickness 100 0.314 (0.123, 0.505) 0.002 91 0.339 (0.115, 0.563) 0.004tibia cortical BMD 100 0.248 (0.051, 0.445) 0.014 91 0.271 (0.046, 0.496) 0.019tibia cortical porosity 100 -0.132 (-0.333, 0.070) 0.197 91 -0.143 (-0.375, 0.088) 0.221tibia trabecular density 100 0.007 (-0.194, 0.208) 0.946 91 0.051 (-0.186, 0.289) 0.668tibia trabecular number 100 0.138 (-0.063, 0.339) 0.175 91 0.155 (-0.071, 0.381) 0.177tibia trabecular thickness 100 -0.073 (-0.272, 0.126) 0.469 91 -0.025 (-0.259, 0.210) 0.835
Results are an SD change per one SD change in predictor
Adjusted for age, height, weight, social class, smoker status, alcohol consumption, activity, dietary calcium and HRT use and years since menopause in women