oud vs physical dependence overview & cascade of care

28
OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care June 1, 2020 Arthur Robin Williams MD MBE FASAM NIDA K23DA044342-01 Assistant Professor, Division on Substance Use Disorders Columbia University Department of Psychiatry

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

June 1, 2020

Arthur Robin Williams MD MBE FASAMNIDA K23DA044342-01

Assistant Professor, Division on Substance Use Disorders

Columbia University Department of Psychiatry

Page 2: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

What is Addiction: DSM 5 criteria

Page 3: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

What is Addiction: DSM 5 criteria

Physical Dependence ≠ OUD

Page 4: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

What is Addiction: DSM 5 criteriaAddiction = loss of control and worsening consequences

Page 5: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Fatal Overdose

OUD,Overdose, or opioid misuse

- Ongoing non-medical opioid use- High dose/MEQ opioid use- Black market substances (fentanyl)- Injection drug use- Concomitant benzo, alcohol use, etc.- Medical conditions (OSA, CHF)- Suicidality (?other psych)- Unable to access specialty care- Medication-free treatment, detox- Treatment drop out/LTFU

- MOUD initiation- Opioid-negative utox first 2 weeks on MAT- MOUD retention >180 days- Comprehensive psychiatric care

High risk populations, modifiers of fatal overdose, other adverse outcomes

AR Williams, Columbia

NOWSHCV, HIV

Other infectionsAcute care services

HospitalizationsSocial contagion?

Injury/death DUI

Page 6: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Cascade of Care (COC) Frameworks Becoming standard approach to chronic disease management

Breaks long-term management into key, sequential stages

Success/failure at each stage can help identify needed interventions

Multiple applications Practice guidelines and standards of care accreditation standards Quality measure development Funding allocations and value based reimbursement Inform further research

HIV, Diabetes, Hepatitis C have deployed effectively

Page 7: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Socías ME, Volkow N, Wood E; Adopting the 'cascade of care' framework: an opportunity to close the implementation gap in addiction care? Addiction; 2016 Dec;111(12):2079-2081.

SUD Cascade derived from HIV Cascade

AR Williams, Columbia

Page 8: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Williams AR, Nunes EV, Bisaga A, Levin FR, Olfson M. Development of a Cascade of Care for Respondingto the Opioid Epidemic. Am J Drug Alc Abuse, in press, 2018

OUD Cascade of Care

AR Williams, Columbia

Page 9: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Kampman and Jarvis American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the Use of Medications in the Treatment of Addiction Involving Opioid Use J Addict Med Volume 9, Number 5, September/October 2015
Page 10: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Kampman and Jarvis American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the Use of Medications in the Treatment of Addiction Involving Opioid Use J Addict Med Volume 9, Number 5, September/October 2015
Page 11: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

• Quality Measures

Page 12: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

• Quality Measures• Funding allocations• Value based reimbursement

Page 13: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

• Quality Measures• Funding allocations• Value based reimbursement • Accreditation Standards

• “Measurement-based care” recent example

Page 14: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

• Quality Measures• Funding allocations• Value based reimbursement • Accreditation Standards

• “Measurement-based care” recent example

• Comparisons across populations and settings (v. individuals)• E.g. Belenko et al JSAT 2017

Page 15: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Applying the Cascade Framework• Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care

• E.g. Kampman & Jarvis ASAM 2015; ASAM 2014• SAMHSA TIP #63 re MAT for OUD

• Quality Measures• Funding allocations• Value based reimbursement • Accreditation Standards

• “Measurement-based care” recent example

• Comparisons across populations and settings (v. individuals)• E.g. Belenko et al JSAT 2017

• Inform further research

Page 16: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Williams AR, Nunes EV, Bisaga A, Levin FR, Olfson M. Development of a Cascade of Care for Respondingto the Opioid Epidemic. Am J Addict; under review, 2018

OUD Cascade of Care

AR Williams, Columbia

Page 17: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Williams AR (2017). Performance Measures and Quality Improvement for the Opioid Overdose Epidemic. In Compton M, Manseau M (eds) Opioid Addiction: An American Crisis. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. 2017 in press

OUD Cascade of Care

Page 18: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care
Page 19: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Quality Measures: Donabedian model• Structural measures refer to quality measures at the system and provider

level • Can be used for accreditation standards

Donabedian A (1988). The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA;260(12)1743-1748.

Page 20: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Quality Measures: Donabedian model• Structural measures refer to quality measures at the system and provider

level • Can be used for accreditation standards

• Process measures refer to metrics pertaining to service delivery• Easiest to track through EHR

Donabedian A (1988). The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA;260(12)1743-1748.

Page 21: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Quality Measures: Donabedian model• Structural measures refer to quality measures at the system and provider

level • Can be used for accreditation standards

• Process measures refer to metrics pertaining to service delivery• Easiest to track through EHR

• Outcome measures typically refer to patients’ clinical outcomes • Require risk adjustment

Donabedian A (1988). The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA;260(12)1743-1748.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Donabedian 1988
Page 22: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Quality Measures, specification• Numerator (i.e. percent with OUD “receiving MAT”)• Denominator (i.e. who counts as having “OUD”)• Inclusion/Exclusion criteria

• Standardization• Risk adjustment

Page 23: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Williams AR, Nunes EV, Bisaga A, Levin FR, Olfson M. Development of a Cascade of Care for Respondingto the Opioid Epidemic. Am J Addict; under review, 2018

OUD Cascade of Care

AR Williams, Columbia

Page 24: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

OUD Treatment Cascade

Page 25: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Engaged in Care

Initiate MOUD

Retention > 6 months, ?longer

Remission

S: % programs with MOUD prescriberP: % Initiated MOUD within x days of intakeO: Opioid negative toxicology in first 14 days of MAT

S: % programs that follow patients who no-showP: % patients drug tested monthly O: % who no longer meet OUD criteria

S: % programs with transportation servicesP: % patients Engaged within 44 daysO: % with OUD receiving acute care services

S: % programs with CBT or CM specialistP: % retained on MOUD for 180+ daysO: Reduction in drug use among those retained

AR Williams, Columbia

Measures for OUD

Page 26: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Engaged in Care

Initiate MOUD

Retention > 6 months, ?longer

Remission

S: % programs with MOUD prescriberP: % Initiated MOUD within x days of intakeO: Opioid negative toxicology in first 14 days of MAT

S: % programs that follow patients who no-showP: % patients drug tested monthly O: % who no longer meet OUD criteria

S: % programs with transportation servicesP: % patients Engaged within 44 daysO: % with OUD receiving acute care services

S: % programs with CBT or CM specialistP: % retained on MOUD for 180+ daysO: Reduction in drug use among those retained

AR Williams, Columbia

Measures for OUD and Pain

Page 27: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

Engaged in Care

Initiate MOUD

Retention > 6 months, ?longer

Remission

P: Co-prescribing of MOUD and opioidsO: Improvement in pain levels

O: Consistency of med administration, dose stabilizationO: Quality of life, level of functioning

S: Opioid prescribers with addiction specialist, peers

S: Care Coordinators and wrap around servicesP: MBC for pain QoL and level of functioning

AR Williams, Columbia

Measures for OUD and Pain

Page 28: OUD vs Physical Dependence Overview & Cascade of Care

• Mark Olfson MD MPH

• Edward V. Nunes MD

• Adam Bisaga MD

• Frances R. Levin MD

• Robert Remien PhD

• Steven Crystal PhD

• Hillary Samples PhD

• Christine Mauro PhD

• Kimberly Johnson MD

• Peter Friedmann MD MPH

• Ben Nordstrom MD

Arthur Robin Williams MD, Columbia University