overview and diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy c. kim 3.25.15

16
OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

Upload: andra-cox

Post on 23-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCYC. KIM 3.25.15

Page 2: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

Learning Objectives

To describe the epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy To list risk factors for ectopic pregnancy To describe how an ectopic pregnancy is diagnosed Prerequisites:

NONE Closely related topics:

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCYSURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY

Page 3: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

DEFINITION

An ectopic pregnancy is an EXTRAUTERINE pregnancy–one in which the BLASTOCYST implants anywhere other than the endometrial lining of the uterine cavity

95% of ectopic pregnancies implant in the fallopian tube1

Page 4: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15
Page 5: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

EPIDEMIOLOGYAccounts for 1-2% of pregnancies in U.S.Accounts for 9% of pregnancy-related

mortality (3rd most common cause)1

1/200,000 are bilateral2

Since 1970, the frequency has increased 4X3-4, however mortality has decreased 10X

Risk of mortality 3.4X higher in non-white women 2/2 issues with access to care3

Page 6: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

RISK FACTORSTubal factors1

prevalence of PID/STIs, especially chlamydia2 which may damage the tube

use of ART (artificial reproductive technologies)Prior pelvic surgery, especially surgery on fallopian

tube for previous ectopic, restorative purposes, or tubal sterilization

Page 7: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

RISK FACTORSOther risk factors:

Advanced maternal ageSmokingSTERILIZATION & IUDS

the risk of having an ectopic if a patient gets pregnant, HOWEVER, because they reduce the overall chance of even becoming pregnant to begin with… the overall risk of ectopic is decreased

Page 8: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

RISK FACTORS1-2 ODDS RATIO (95% CI)

Prior ectopic pregnancy 12.5 (7.5-20.9)

Prior tubal surgery 4.0 (2.6-6.1)

Smoking 20+ cigarettes/day 3.5 (1.4-8.6)

Confirmed PID via laparoscopy and/or positive test for C. trachomatis

3.4 (2.4-5.0)

3+ prior spontaneous miscarriages 3.0 (1.3-6.9)

40+ years of age 2.9 (1.4-6.1)

Prior medical or surgical abortion 2.8 (1.1-7.2)

12+ months of Infertility 2.6 (1.6-4.2)

5+ sexual partners over lifetime 1.6 (1.2-2.1)

Previous IUD-use 1.3 (1.0-1.8)

Page 9: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

CLINICAL PRESENTATION Approximately 50% of women diagnosed

with ectopic have no identifiable risk factors Classic symptoms include:

Abdominal pain Nausea / vomiting Missed period Vaginal bleeding

Other symptoms may include: syncope, dizziness, pregnancy symptoms, referred shoulder pain (due to blood in the abdomen irritating the diaphragm)

Page 10: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Tubal abortion Obstetric complications of an intrauterine pregnancy:

Threatened / Missed / Complete/ Incomplete abortionMolar pregnancy / Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Non-pregnant gynecologic causes:PID, follicular or corpus luteum cyst rupture,

endometriosis, ovarian torsion Common non-gynecologic causes:

Appendicitis, gastroenteritis, UTI, kidney stones,

Page 11: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

CLINICAL EVALUATION Physical exam

Can range from totally normal to hypovolemic shock and acute abdomen; abdominal/pelvic tenderness is found in 50-90% of patients

CMT (cervical motion tenderness) is also common Labs: CBC, b-HCG, Blood type and screen, +/- Progesterone

Beta HCG: The "discriminatory zone" of hCG is ~1,500–2,000 mIU/mL,

which when reached, is associated with the appearance of a normal singleton intrauterine gestation on TVUS1

Further, if the serum hCG is not rising > 53% over 48 hours, this confirms an abnormal pregnancy (99% sensitive)

Serum progesterone: > 20 normal IUP, 5-20 equivocal, <5 abnl pregnancy

MUCH less specific, rarely used

Page 12: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

DIAGNOSIS Imaging: Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)

If the hCG level is higher than the discriminatory zone, and the TVUS shows no IUP, ectopic pregnancy is likely (about 2/3)

An adnexal mass is found in ~1/3 of patients, however the absence of an adnexal mass DOES NOT rule out ectopic

Other concerning signs on TVUS include: free fluid in the pelvis or evidence of a pseudo-sac in the uterus

Other diagnostic tools Dilation & curettage - to check for products of conception (used in

cases of confirmed abnormal pregnancy or in cases where even if a threatened abortion of an early IUP was possible, that the pregnancy would NOT be desired)

Culdocentesis - using a needle to check for blood in the posterior cul-de-sac which would be present if the ectopic pregnancy ruptured

Rarely used, given modern ultrasound availability

Page 13: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

TVUS: WHAT DO YOU SEE?

#1(Wikipedia commons)

#2 #3

Page 14: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

TVUS: WHAT DO YOU SEE?

Ectopic in the adnexa

(Wikipedia commons)

Free fluid in posterior cul-de-sac

Ring of fire

Page 16: OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY C. KIM 3.25.15

OTHER SOURCES Barnhart KT. Ectopic Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009; 261:379-387

Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, et al: Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 157:185, 2003  [PubMed: 12543617]

Lipscomb, G. Obstetrics & Gynecology: 2010 - Volume 115 - Issue 3 – p 487-488

al-Awwad MM, al Daham N, Eseet JS: Spontaneous unruptured bilateral ectopic pregnancy: conservative tubal surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 54:543, 1999  [PubMed: 10481854]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Ectopic pregnancy—United States, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 44:46, 1995

Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, Bruce C, et al: Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization. Obstet Gynecol 105:1052, 2005

Ankum WM, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, et al: Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 65:1093, 1996  [PubMed: 8641479]

Rajkhowa M, Glass MR, Rutherford AJ, et al: Trends in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in England and Wales from 1966 to 1996. BJOG 107:369, 2000  [PubMed: 10740334]

Mol BW, Ankum WM, Bossuyt PM, et al: Contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Contraception 52:337, 1995  [PubMed: 8749596]

Buster JE, Pisarska MD: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 42:23, 1999  [PubMed: 10073296]

Doubilet et al. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy in the early first trimester. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1443-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1302417